Loading...
07-0228_CC_Minutes_Adjourned Regular Meeting2-28-2007 1 MINUTES FEBRUARY 28, 2007 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO CITY COUNCIL AND A JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND WATER ADVISORY COMMISSION ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING Mayor Allevato called the Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of San Juan Capistrano to order at 5:30 p.m. in the City Council Chamber. ROLL CALL COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Tom Hribar, Dr. Londres Uso, Mark Nielsen Mayor pro tem Joe Soto, and Mayor Sam Allevato COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Dave Adams, City Manager; John Shaw, City Attorney; William M. Huber, Assistant City Manager; and Maria Morris, Deputy City Clerk CLOSED SESSION (610.85) A Closed Session was held for the following purposes, as authorized by statute: a. Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9, the City Council conferred with its legal counsel regarding the status of City of San Juan Capistrano v. Brose, et al. b. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9, the City Council conferred with its legal counsel regarding the status of Scalzo Trust v. City of San Juan Capistrano. (Mayor pro tem Soto abstained) PUBLIC COMMENT – CLOSED SESSION ITEM b: Don Vanderland, City resident, opposed construction of a wall on the development property line as it would disrupt drainage and cause damage to neighboring properties. He supported the drainage plan prepared by the City’s consultant. Karen Gardner, opposed construction of a wall and supported maintaining the integrity of the canyon area with regard to wildlife, water runoff, and slope stability. 2-28-2007 2 Greg Sykes, City resident, supported preserving rural character of area; efficiently managing natural spring runoff; and Condition 17 of the planning review and hydrology study matrix. He recommended an additional easement in the lower part of the development, adjusting the location and size and design of new retaining walls away from the middle of the canyon; and providing a soft bottom channel with open sides to naturally filter water into the City aquifer. The City Council moved to Closed Session Chambers and continued the meeting. JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL & WATER ADVISORY COMMISSION Mayor Allevato called the Joint Meeting of the City Council of the City of San Juan Capistrano and Water Advisory Commission to order at 7:04 p.m. in the City Council Chamber. Council Member Hribar led the Pledge of Allegiance and Mayor pro tem Soto gave the invocation. ROLL CALL COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Tom Hribar, Dr. Londres Uso, Mark Nielsen, Mayor pro tem Joe Soto, and Mayor Sam Allevato COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: None WATER ADVISORY COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: Alan Freisleben (7:30 arrival), Dan Merkle, Jack Zepp, Vice Chairman Tom Lytle and Chairman Lee Goode. WATER ADVISORY COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Dave Adams, City Manager; Maria Morris, Deputy City Clerk; Cynthia L. Russell, Administrative Services Director; John Elwell, Interim Public Works Director; Michelle Perea, Secretary to the Water Advisory Commission; Peter Salgado, Senior Civil Engineer; and Eileen White, Recording Secretary ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ACTIONS - None DISCUSSION ITEMS 1. CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO WATER SYSTEM OVERVIEW REPORT RECEIVED AND FILED. (1050.40) Description: The City provides Domestic Water and Non Domestic Water service to its citizens and a small portion of Dana Point. The Domestic Water System is comprised of the Ground Water Recovery Plant (GWRP), water wells, reservoirs and associated pipe and stations. The update to the City’s Domestic 2-28-2007 3 Water Master Plan, adopted in March 2004, provides for capital improvements to address current and projected demands. The Non-Domestic Water System is comprised of 3 non-potable water wells (2 inactive), a storage reservoir, and pipe system. The Non-Domestic Water Master Plan (NDWMP), adopted in 2000, contemplated ways to meeting the growing demand for irrigation water and included the expansion of the existing system infrastructure as well as construction of an Advanced Water Treatment Plant (AWTP) at the existing J.B. Latham Wastewater Plant in Dana Point. Changes in user demand, the opportunity to obtain increased capacity from the proposed AWTP, and project revisions affecting the timing and availability of domestic facilities have resulted in a need to update the 2000 NDWMP. Staff and engineering consultants have prepared the updated Conceptual Non-Domestic/Recycled Water Master Plan for Water Advisory Commission and City Council review. In addition to the update, staff evaluated 2 alternatives to the use of Recycled Water for Council and Commission discussion. Staff recommended Council/Commission receive and file the staff report. Written Communications: Report dated February 28, 2007, by Peter Salgado, Senior Civil Engineer. Presentations: Paul Jones II, General Manager of the Irvine Ranch Water District, narrated a slide presentation concerning the Irvine Ranch Water District’s recycled water program. Larry Honeybourne, County of Orange Healthcare Agency, discussed public health and public safety concerns with respect to recycled water production and use. Peter Salgado, Senior Civil Engineer, summarized the staff report. Public Comment: Arlene Sayre, City resident, was concerned with the groundwater recovery plant producing dark colored water at her home, which has resulted in high costs for regular water filter changes and the need to bathe at work. John Elwell, Interim Public Works Director, confirmed that water can be discolored, but is safe for drinking. Mary Eidsvold, City resident, was concerned with costs and impact of long term construction to build a wastewater recycling plant and low need for non-domestic water resources. She was concerned with the production of colored water, chronic water production problems, and reliance on rate payers to fund the master plan. 2-28-2007 4 MaryAnn Tucker, City resident, felt the proposed wastewater recycling plant would be too disruptive with limited benefit. She encouraged the planting of drought resistant vegetation, hardscape installation, and water conservation lifestyles. Dan Glasgow, City resident, was ambivalent toward the project, but cautioned that imported water may not always be available and suggested further consideration was warranted. Richard Garner, Capistrano Beach resident, supported the City’s involvement in recycled water; reduced dependence on outside sources for water; and the potential to partner with other interested parties in order to realize the same benefits with less capital outlay. Council & Commission Comment: Council Member Uso suggested spending more resources on water conservation and challenged staff to resolve the water quality problems from the groundwater recovery plant. He felt that long term planning of water resources was vital to reducing future costs, but suggested looking into funding improvements through a bond, as the improvements would not benefit current rate-payers as much as future rate-payers. He felt moving toward water independence was important as outside water resources may not be as dependable and they are impacted by forces outside of the control of the City. Council Member Nielsen questioned the accuracy of the projected future water needs analysis as well as the extensive piping installation required. He felt there were fundamental problems with the analysis of future water needs which need to be resolved before moving forward with additional projects. Mayor Allevato reported a recent meeting with Congressman Calvert, who is assisting the City obtain Federal grants for our water facilities, and relayed concerns with the impact of rapid increases in development and competition from western states which decrease dependability of past water resources. These issues, in addition to the questionable quality of water being produced by the Ground Water Recovery Plant, point to a greater need for recycled water plant. Council & Commission Action: Moved by Mayor pro tem Soto, seconded by Council Member Nielsen and carried unanimously, 10-0, to receive and file the staff report. 2. WATER SYSTEM FINANCIAL STRATEGY APPROVED IN CONCEPT. (1050.20/330.40) Description: The City’s water system costs include two components, operational costs and the costs of new infrastructure, improvements, and replacement. 2-28-2007 5 Increased rates over the past ten years have resulted in a number of programs designed to replace existing facilities as well as provided for improved overall system reliability and security. During this same time period the operational costs have continued to increase along with the cost of imported water by a rate larger than our annual operational rate increases, resulting in operational revenues being lower than anticipated costs and deficit operational reserves. Additionally, the anticipated Non-Domestic/Recycled Water Master Plan, at an approximate cost of $74 million, will be funded by developer charges, grants, and user rates. The master plan financing and operational rate needs have been combined to provide an overall water system financial picture. The projected operational increase for Fiscal Year (FY) 2007/08 and consistent annual operational increases are necessary for the next five to seven years to rebuild the water system’s financial strength. In addition, an increase is necessary to support the Non-Domestic/Recycled Water Master Plan. The increases combined with the increase to support the Domestic Water Master Plan result in an increase of 10% in FY 2007/08 and 8.5% thereafter for the next six years. Staff recommended Council and Commission review the overall water system financial strategy and approve in concept the Water System Financial Strategy to support the Non- Domestic/Recycled Water Master Plan as well as operational costs; and direct staff to develop a final proposed rate structure for consideration by the Water Advisory Commission and City Council prior to appropriate notifications and required public hearings for developer charges and user rates. Written Communications: Report dated February 28, 2007, by Cindy Russell, Administrative Services Director. Presentation: Cindy Russell, Administrative Services Director, summarized the staff report. Public Comment: John Perry, City resident, expressed concern with the proposed water rate increases. He suggested purchasing water, as this would be less costly and felt that any proposed water facilities should be financed by a bond rather than on the rate-payers. Jack Chestek, City resident, expressed concern with increased water rates and the cost of the proposed wastewater recycling plant. He felt more funding sources should be investigated as an alternative to charging rate-payers for costs. Richard Gardner, Capistrano Beach resident, felt the City is in a good position and competitively priced. He suggested financing through property taxes or other means. 2-28-2007 6 Council & Commission Comment: Commissioner Merkle suggested the City Council should not rely on past outside water resources and needed to be creative in developing a mix of solutions to address water needs, including solving problems with the groundwater recovery plant, implementing water conservation programs, and matching water resources with our needs, including providing a non-domestic water system. Council Member Uso felt it was important for the City to proceed with unpopular decisions related to water resources and supported looking at consolidation alternatives while moving forward with studying new improvements. Council Member Hribar supported investigating consolidating services with other water districts as the City has resources to bring to the table. Council Member Nielsen felt there was a need to move forward, but the City should also study why our rates are higher than other districts and investigate benefits of consolidating with other districts for economies of scale and to provide more diversity at a better cost. Mayor Allevato supported exploring consolidation but felt there were benefits of having a stand-alone system. Dave Adams, City Manager, indicated staff could begin the process of exploring benefits of consolidating water districts, but would need support from a consultant to handle this study now. John Elwell, Interim Public Works Director, reported a need to proceed with the recycled plant environmental process as this is a condition for the Title 50 funding. Council & Commission Action: Moved by Council Member Nielsen, seconded by Council Member Uso and carried unanimously, 10-0, to direct staff to proceed with operational rate increase of 5% on July 1, 2007 with future annual increases of 3.5% for 4 years; proceed with the environmental impact report process for improvements to the water system; delay rate increases related to improvements pending further study of alternatives; and pursue options to consolidate operations with other water districts and return to Council for consideration. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Allevato adjourned the meeting at 10:50 p.m. to Tuesday, March 6, 2007, at 5:30 p.m. for Closed Session, and 7:00 p.m. for the Public Business Session, in the City Council Chamber. 2-28-2007 7 Chairman Goode adjourned the Water Advisory Commission to Tuesday, March 27, 2007, at 8:00 a.m. in the City Council Chamber. Respectfully submitted, __________________________________ MARGARET R. MONAHAN, CITY CLERK Approved: April 3, 2007 ATTEST: ______________________________ SAM ALLEVATO, MAYOR