76-0602_CC_Minutes_Regular Meeting174
JUNE L, 1976
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL 01' THE CITY
OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA
The Regular Meeting of the City Council was called to order by
Mayor Nash at 7:06 P.M. in the City Council Chamber, followed by
the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. Invocation was given by
Reverend Julian King, Capistrano Valley Baptist Church.
ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Douglas B. Nash, Mayor
Yvon O. Heckscher, Mayor pro tem
Kenneth E. Friess, Councilman
Richard D. McDowell, Councilman
John B. Sweeney, Councilman
ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: James S. Mocalis, City Manager; William B. Murphy,
Director of Public Works/City Engineer; Thomas B. Merrell,
Director of Planning; James S. Okazaki, City Attorney; Mary Ann
Hanover, City Clerk.
MINUTES:
Regular Meeting, May 19, 1976:
It was moved by Councilman Sweeney, seconded by Councilman
McDowell and unanimously carried that the Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of May 19, 1976, be approved with the following amend-
ments: (1) Page 4, "Capistrano Airport Report and Discussion,"
the last line of the fourth paragraph is to read, ". . .should not be
shut down and that requiring payment of a nominal landing fee
would not deter landings by transient aircraft, but would provide
an opportunity for their pilots to become more conscious of the
constraints on airport use." (2) Page 8, "Approval of Tentative
Tract 9299 - Aguacate Road," add to the last line of the seventh
paragraph, . . that he was not convinced that the removal of
the earthen dam was necessary from a safety viewpoint, and that
the removal of the dam could have considerable adverse impact on
the existing fauna."
MOTION TO READ BY TITLE ONLY
It was moved by Cor-icilman Heckscher, seconded by Councilman
Sweeney and unanimously carried that all ordinances be read by
title only.
BIDS, CONTRACTS, AGREEMENTS
1. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONSULTING A
(74) Council received copies of a report dated June 2, 1976, from
the Director of Public Works forwarding copies of a proposed
agreement for the provision of consulting structural
engineering services when detailed and complex structural
designs or field investigations are required.
It was moved by Councilman Sweeney, seconded by Councilman
Heckscher and unanimously carried to approve the Agreement
for Structural Engineering Consulting Services between the
City and Boyle Engineer_ng Corporation, to authorize the
Mayor to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City and
the City Clerk to attest thereto.
-1- 6/2/76
1'75
2. AGREEMENT FOR POSTPONEMENT OF TIME FOR
With the concurrence of the Council, Mayor Nash directed
that this Agreement be considered with the proposed General
Plan Amendment for Mission Hills Ranch, Inc., which appears
later on the Agenda.
3. PROPOSAL FOR RISK MANAGEMENT & INSURANCE ANALYSIS
(41) Council received copies of a report dated June 2, 1976,
from the Director of Administrative Services forwarding
copies of a proposal for a Risk Managementarnd Insurance
Audit, as requested by Council on May 19, 1976.
It was moved by Councilman Sweeney, seconded by Councilman
Heckscher and unanimously carried that the audit proposal
and costs therefor be included in the 1976-77 fiscal budget
for review at the time of budget considerations.
4. AGREEMENT FOR USE OF SCHOOL FACILITIES -
RECREATION PROGRAM
(62) Council received copies of a report dated June 2, 1976,
from Tom Baker, Recreation Coordinator, forwarding copies
of a proposed Agreement with the Capistrano Unified School
District for use of school facilities for the City's
recreation program. The District will maintain the facili-
ties, pay utilities, and provide $4800 from the Community
Service Tax for use during the 1976 Summer Recreation
Program. The City will provide the program, employees, and
any recreational equipment not available at the school sites.
Mayor Nash inquired if the facilities could also be used
for evening meetings and activities.
It was moved by Councilman Sweeney, seconded by Councilman
Heckscher and unanimously carried to approve the Agreement
between the City and the Capistrano Unified School District
for use of school facilities for the City's recreation
program. The Agreement is for a one-year period of time
with provisions for renewal.
5.
(80) Council received copies of a report dated June 2, 1976,
from the Director of Public Works forwarding copies of an
Agreement between the City and the Orange County Flood
Control District extending the termination date of the
contract for the construction of the Alipaz Storm Drain to
January 30, 1977, due to unavoidable time conflicts.
It was moved by Councilman McDowell, seconded by Councilman
Sweeney and unanimously carried to approve the Agreement,
and authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement on behalf
of the City and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
6. ADMINISTRATIVE AGREEMENT FOR ALIPAZ STREET. ARTERIAL
(44) Council received copies of a report dated June 2, 1976, from
the Director of Public Works forwarding copies of an Agree-
ment between the City and the County of Orange for adminis-
tration of the Alipaz Street Improvement Project, AHFP #674.
The Agreement establishes contractural guidlines for funding
and construction; the project extends on Alipaz Street from
Camino del Avion to 1800 feet northerly.
-2- 6/2/76
176 It was moved by Councilman Sweeney, seconded by Councilman
IIeckscher and unanimously carried to approve the County of
Orange Arterial Highway Financing Program #674 Administra-
tive Agreement for Alipaz Street noting that the total cost
estimates in Conditions 7(a) and 7(b) of said Agreement are
in error and should be $533,000 instead of $533,100, and to
authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement on behalf of
the City and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
BICENTENNIAL COMMITTEE
(23) PRESENTATION OF CERTIFICATES AND OFFICIAL AMERICAN
REVOLUTION BICENTENNIAL FLAG
Minnie Surles, Chairman of the City's Bicentennial Committee,
presented the City with a Certificate of Appreciation from ^'
the American Freedom Train Foundation in recognition of the
City's contribution to the Train's Bicentennial journey.
Mrs. Surles also presented A Bicentennial Message from the
President of the United States commending the community for
its achievements in providing lasting reminders of the
nation's Bicentennial.
Jasper Hostler, Chairman of the Capistrano Indian Council,
presented the City with a replacement for the Official
American Revolution Bicentennial Flag. The City's Flag had
been pilfered during the celebration of the American
Freedom Train visit on January 20, 1976, and the Indian
Council undertook its replacement as a Bicentennial Project.
Mayor Nash expressed his appreciation to Mrs. Surles and
Mr. Hostler on behalf of the City.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. GENERAL
76-1(A
(46) Mayor Nash requested that consideration of the access study
for Mission Hills Ranch Phase II, which appears later on
the Agenda, be combined with discussion of the petition for
a General Plan Amendment as presented uy Mission Hills
Ranch, Inc.
Council received copies of a report dated June 2, 1976, from
the Director of Planning forwarding the recommendations of
the Planning Commission that the petition be denied and the
present land use designations, as shown in General Plan
Amendment 75-1, retained. The present land use designations
would result in approximately 180 units on the property;
the applicant's petition would provide for approximately
274 units. Proposed methods for implementation of the
General Plan ridgeline protection designation were also
forwarded to Council.
Council also received copies of a report dated June 2, 1976,
from George Alvarez, Secretary to the Traffic and Trans-
portation Commission, forwarding the Commission recommenda-
tion with regard to access for the Phase II development of
Mission hills Ranch. That recommendation is that Mission
Hills Drive initially serve as access to an undetermined
number of units and thereafter a primary access route is
to be developed in conjunction with the closure of Mission
Hills Drive; the precise alignment -and the closure of
Mission Hills Drive are to be determined at the tentative
map stage.
-3- 6/2/76
117
The Director of Planning made an oral presentation using
the Composite Land Use Map and density charts as exhibits.
The densities requested by the applicant would require
review of the General Plan for the entire 157 acre parcel.
Mr. Merrell noted ridgelines are presently designated as
open space and that staff had recommended that specific
criteria be included in the Land Use Code to interpret,
define and protect major ridgelines in the City. Matters
of access should be considered at the time a specific tract
map is presented. If the Planning Commission recommendation
is accepted, access would be unchanged, density would allow
180 units, and ridgeline protection would be implemented by
Land Use management Code amendments.
Notice having been given as provided by law, Mayor Nash
declared the Public Hearing open on the request of mission
Hills Ranch, Inc., for a General Plan Amendment to provide
for a change in land use designations and inquired if anyone
in the audience wished to address the Council. The follow-
ing persons addressed the Council:
1. Justus Gilfillen, 4300 Campus Drive, Newport Beach,
representing the applicant, requested that all
previous testimony and reports submitted with
regard to General Plan Amendment 76-1 be included
in this discussion by reference. He stated that
the developer should be able to use the ridgeline
property or as an alternative suggested acquisition
by the City or incentives to landowners. He
suggested a density bonus of 5 units per acre
would be more appropriate than transfer density of
1 unit per acre on general open space. He stated
that they have provided detailed maps for 10
alternative access routes and should not be denied
use of Mission Hills Drive for access.
2. Carl Neuhausen of Haworth, Anderson and Lafer,
consultants to Mission Hills Ranch, Inc. stated
that there are discrepancies in General Plan Amend-
ment 75-1 and questioned the validity of existing
maps. He cited the.degree of slopes in various
areas, existing cut and fill, and location of
equestrian facilities.
Justus Gilfillen addressed tbt Council regarding
the recommendation of the Traffic and Transportation
Commission and requested that the matter be returned
to the Commission for further review and specific
recommendations. He cited several reports and
studies on the use of Mission Hills Drive for access.
Mr. Gilfillen also stated that on behalf of Mission
Hills Ranch, Inc., a proposal had been submitted to
the members of the Mission Hills Ranch Homeowners
Association for their consideration. Councilman
Heckscher inquired if the proposal is an alternate
to the petition for a General Plan Amendment
currently under consideration. Mr. Gilfillen
stated that the proposal would be an acceptable
package to the developer and includes the following:
density and land use are as in Exhibit II, limited
to 221 units; land use would.be as proposed by
staff; density in specific areas as shown in the
Exhibit; Chart "A" ridgeline and use restriction
would remain as is; Chart "B" open space restriction
on height limitation would be placed so that Mission
Hills Drive is closed and_a•cul-de-sac of the
street would not be opposed; Route I would be
alternate access; construction of an access route
on adjacent property would be acceptable to that
-4- 6/2/76
1 �•A yy land owner with the land being conveyed to the
City and the road constructed by another party.
Mayor Nash inquired if this proposal is what the
developer wishes to have adopted by the City
Council, and Mr. Gilfillen stated that it would
be acceptable.
3. Michael Berns, 26921 Canyon Crest Road, as repre-
sentative of the Mission Hills Community Relations
Committee, stated that he was not aware of any new
proposal. He recommended that the primary access
should be Route 5 or a road entering front the east
and that secondary emergency access could be
Mission Hills Drive; that Mission Hills Drive
should be closed now rather than at a later date
and that it should not be used for construction
traffic; he requested that the City re -affirm its
intention of implementing the Master Plan of
Equestrian Trails. Copies of a memorandum were
provided to Council.
4. Bruce Church, 26851 Canyon Crest Road, requested
that the area at the top of Mission Hills Drive
be a greenbelt area with a link up to the equestrian
trail system.
5. Bob Olson, 27065 Mission Hills Drive, stated that
current traffic is a hazard for children and
animals and that additional traffic volumes would
worsen the problem.
6. Melinda Broder, Lariat Circle, noted the problems
of street safety and traffic and stated that autos
run over the curbs and damage property.
7. Frank Bell, 30112 Silver Spur Road, President of
the Homeowners Association, stated that the Board
of Directors is not aware of any new proposal from
the developers; the Association had voted not to
approve a previous proposal due to densities.
There being no one else wishing to address the Council,
Mayor Nash declared the Public Hearing closed with the right
to re -open at any time.
General Plan Amendment 76-1(A) - (Mission Hills Ranch Phase II):
(46) Following discussion between Council and representatives of
the developer, it was moved by Councilman McDowell and \
seconded by Councilman Sweeney that consideration of land
use designations and density be referred back to the
Planning Commission for consideration of the Planning staff
submittal and for consideration of the proposal submitted
by Mission Hills Ranch, Inc. The motion carried by the
following vote:
AYES: Councilmen Sweeney, McDowell and Heckscher
NOES: Councilman Friess and Mayor Nash
ABSENT: None
Access Study, Mission I;ills Ranch Phase II:
(87) It was moved by Councilman Heckscher and seconded by Mayor
Nash that staff be instructed to design a cul-de-sac at the
end of Mission Hills Drive that would allow, if necessary,
access to emergency vehicles through the cul-de-sac in
emergency situations and would allow access to the existing
-5- 6/2/76
179
horse stables; staff is to investigate implications of that
cul-de-sac, including costs involved and timing. The motion
carried by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmen Friess, Heckscher and Mayor Nash
NOES: Councilmen Sweeney and McDowell
ABSENT: None
at for Postoonement of Time for
(35) With the concurrence of the Council, Mayor Nash directed
that consideration of the proposed Agreement be continued
to the Council meeting of June 16, 1976.
RECESS AND RECONVENE
Council recessed at 9:30 P.M. and reconvened at 9:55 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARINGS (CONTINUED)
2.
9E
(46) Council received copies of a report dated June 2, 1976,
from the Director of Planning forwarding the recommendation
of the Planning Commission that General Plan Amendment 76-1 (B)
be approved for a. change from 2.0 General Open Space to 4.1
Quasi -Industrial for Assessor's Parcel No. 668-112-04. The
property is located on the west side of Camino Capistrano
opposite the San Juan Creek Road Freeway off -ramp and is
presently zoned CM (Commercial Manufacturing).
Notice having been given as required by law, Mayor Nash
declared the Public Hearing open on proposed General Plan
Amendment 76-1 (B) and inquired if anyone in the audience
wished to address the Council. There being no response,
the Mayor declared the Public Hearing closed.
76-6-2-1: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 76-1 (B
� IX, .IXLIIl Hll VVAil El.11 V1V 1V l ViVlYVDI IE Lti1VL UDE ffi.'11') - 11 6EDVLU-
TION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 76-1 (B)
It was moved by Councilman Sweeney and seconded by Mayor Nash
that Resolution No. 76-6-2-1 be adopted. The motion carried
by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmen Sweeney, McDowell, Friess, Heckscher
and Mayor Nash
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ORDINANCES
1. PROPOSED ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR THE
(48) Council received copies of a report dated June 2, 1976, from
the City Manager forwarding copies of the revised airport
ordinance for Council consideration. Council also received
copies of a letter from Bruce Winton, partner in the Airport
operation, requesting certain changes in the proposed
ordinance.
-6- 6/2/76
SO Council discussed further modifications with staff, and the
following persons addressed the Council:
1. Winston Pearl, Via Bronca, regarding flight
patterns.
2. Rose Corrigan, Los Cerritos Ranch, regarding
proposed hours of operation.
3. Bruce Winton, partner, Capistrano Airport, regard-
ing landing fees, records required, and hours of
operation.
4. Joe St. Jean, 33152 Via Mayor.
5. Clyde Pierce, 31206 Cloud Drive, Laguna Niguel,
regarding landing fees.
ORDINANCE NO. 304: REGULATING AIRPORT USE - AN ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA, DEFINING
AND REGULATING THE USE AND HOURS OF OPERATION OF THE
CAPISTRANO AIRPORT RUNWAY AND TAXIWAY was read by title
by the City Attorney. Further reading of all ordinances
had been waived earlier in the meeting.
It was moved by Councilman Heckscher and seconded by Council-
man Friess that Ordinance No. 304 be introduced, as amended.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmen Sweeney, McDowell, Friess,
Heckscher and Mayor Nash
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Councilman Sweeney suggested that the County be urged to
instigate a search in the South County area for another
location for the airport operation within approximately
three years so that action by the County and/or the airport
operators is accelerated.
Mayor Nash stated that the General Plan does not designate
the airport as a long-term use, but if the present opera-
tion can be mri_ntained in a compatible manner its shut
down should not be forced. The Mayor requested that the
City Manager draft a letter to the appropriate County
agencies advising that the airport is not defined as a
permanent land -use and urging a decision that another site
is needed.
Councilman Heckscher stated he does not subscribe to a
deadline and that he would discourage providing an impetus
to a close down of the airport at this time; possible future
sites for an airport location should be investigated.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
1. ANNEXATION OF COUNTY TERRITORY
(21) Jim Vanderhoof, 25692 Via del Rey, addressed the Council
regarding annexation by the City of the area known as the
Marlborough Tract.
2. AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION
(68) Marilyn Williams addressed the Council on behalf of the "No
on A Committee" which was organized to oppose the Proposition
providng for preservation of agricultural lands which appeared
on the March, 1976, municipal ballot. Mrs. Williams read a
statement dated May 31, 1976, regarding a memorandum written
by Mayor Nash concerning the failure of Proposition A and
-7- 6/2/76
1�x
requested that a. public apology be made to the members of
the Committee. Mayor Nash advised that the comments made
were his personal opinion and that the memorandum was
intended as a general overview; his comments were not
directed to any one person or organization, and lie apologized
if anyone had been offended.
3, AIRPORT REGULATIONS
(48) Chuck Morrissey, Dana Point, addressed the Council and
stated that proposed decals for identification of airplanes
would not be feasible,
4. FINAL MAP, TRACT 9181 (GLENDALE FEDERAL)
(85) Larry Schlesser of Wilshire Diversified, addressed the Council
on behalf of Glendale Federal to request that Council consider
this matter at the proposed meeting of June 9th, It was the
consensus of the Council that the matter be continued to the
Regular Council Meeting of June 16, 1976, as requested
previously by the applicant.
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Councilman McDowell, seconded by Councilman
Sweeney and unanimously carried that the staff recommendations be
accepted with regard to the following Consent Calendar items:
1. APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
(41) The List of Demands dated June 2, 1976, Warrants Nos. 7239
through 7304, inclusive, in the total amount of $83,033.46,
is approved as submitted.
2. THIRD ANNUAL BIKE RIDE FOR DIABETES
(76) The request of the American Diabetes Association for permis-
sion to conduct its third annual Bike Ride Against Diabetes
on October 3, 1976, between 9:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. is
approved with the condition that an additional check point
be established at the intersection of Del Obispo and Camino
del Avion, as recommended by the Traffic and Transportation
Commission. The ride will be coordinated with the Orange
County Sheriff's Department.
REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 25 1976
(68) Council received copies of a report dated June 2, 1976,
from the Director of Planning summarizing actions taken by
the Planning Commission at its regular meeting of May 25,
1976, for information.
Council requested that Item No. 7 on the report, a request
by the County of Orange for a determination of General Plan
consistency for two fire station sites, be held over for
discussion at the meeting of June 16, 1976.
(83) Council received copies of a report dated June 2, 1976,
from the Director of Public {Yorks forwarding background
information on negotiations between the City and Charles
and Irene Vermeulen for the acquisition of the final right-
of-way required for the construction of the Alipaz Street
improvements and the Alipaz storm drain.
-8- 6/2/76
It was moved by Councilman Heckscher, seconded by Councilman
Sweeney and unanimously carried to approve the Agreement
between the City and Charles and Irene Vermeulen for the
acquisition of the right-of-way for Alipaz Street and to
accept the necessary Easement Deeds, one for street and
highway purposes and one for drainage purposes. The Mayor
and City Clerk are authorized to execute the documents oil
behalf of the City; the Finance Department is authorized to
draw a warrant in the amount of $2,000 in favor of Charles I.
and Irene E. Vermeulen in total payment of the aforesaid
right-of-way to be paid at the time of recording of the
Easement Deeds.
SUBDIVISIONS AND ANNEXATIONS
1. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP.FOR DIVISION OF LAND 76-4 (ENGLISH)
(85) Council received copies of a report dated June 2, 1976, from
the Director of Planning regarding the request of Lawrence
English that a subdivision of 3.46 acres of land into four
parcels be allowed in the EL (Large Estate) District. The
property is located on the west side of Aguacate Road and
is known as Assessor's Parcel Nos. 649-101-18 and -19.
It was moved by Councilman Sweeney, seconded by Councilman
Heckscher and unanimously carried to approve Division of
Land 76-4, subject to the findings and conditions specified
in Planning Commission Resolution of approval No. PC 76-5-25-4.
2. DIVISIONS OF LAND 76-1, 76-2. 76-3, and 76-6 (McCRACKEN HILL)
(85) Councilman Sweeney stepped down from the dais at this point
since he has an interest in property under consideration.
Council received copies of a report dated June 2, 1976, from
the Director of Planning forwarding background information on
the requests for approval of Divisions of Land for McCracken
Hill. Action on these requests had been deferred by the
Council on April 7, 1976, pending receipt of further informa-
tion on sewage disposal and access. Subdivision maps were
displayed for Council review.
The Director of Planning advised that additional information
has been considered by the Planning Commission and Environmental
Review Board and that approval of the subdivisions is recom-
mended with the conditions that a sanitary sewer system�nd
a 40' roadway be installed prior to recording of the final
maps. He further advised that the information indicates that
if the entire McCracken Hill area were developed at maximum
densities allowed under the present zoning, private sewer
systems would not create a public health or safety problem
provided they are properly installed to soils engineering
standards; and, a road system 40' in width would be required
at the time there are 20 dwelling units. The area under
consideration consists of 35 acres with a zoning capacity of
2 units per acre.
Councilman Friess stated his concerns with the cumulative
effects of development with private spetic tank systems. Mayor
Nash stated his concerts with allowing private sewerage systems
and resultant water seepage in an area underlain by a large
landslide -prone bedrock; he further questioned allowing the
private systems due to the amount of grading that would be
required.
Leon Chaulet of Westland Associates, engineering geologists,
addressed the Council and cited their report on the geological
history of the area. He suggested that property owners
should enter into an agreement to join a sewer assessment
-9- 6/2/76
district; certain lots will not be allowed private sewer
systems due to ground instability.
Councilman Heckscher stated that he is concerned with the
factor of inducing growth by requiring a 40' roadway and
a public sewer system. Councilman Friess requested clarifica-
tion of the roadway and was advised that there would be
some improvements made to the existing roadway but it would
not accommodate more than 20 units.
It was moved by Councilman McDowell and seconded by Councilman
Heckscher to determine that the information submitted is
adequate and to approve the divisions of land subject to
the conditions of approval contained in Planning Commission
Resolution PC 76-3-16-1, but deleting the first sentence of
Condition 11 which requires a public sewer prior to approval
of a final parcel map. Discussion ensued between Council
members and Steve McMillan, representative of three of the
apllicants. With the concurrence of the second, the motion
was amended so that Condition 6 reads as follows:
"6. Access to the property is presently a private
street. The property owner shall enter into an
agreement to form an assessment district and
shall participate in the construction of public
or private improvements prior to commencement of
construction on the first unit. The property
owners shall participate in the construction of
the road from the junction with Valle Road to the
property boundary. The width of road section and
thickness of the pavement structure shall be
determined by the City Engineer."
Condition.11 will read as follows:
1111. The property owner shall enter into an agreement
to form an assessment district and participate in
the construction of a sanitary sewer system.
Additionally, the'property owner shall agree to
join said sanitary sewer system in accordance
with Section 4.1.11E of the Land Use Management
Code."
Councilman McDowell then re -stated the motion with the
concurrence of the second, as follows:
Division of Land 76-1 (Sweeney):
It was move younce man c owell and seconded by Councilman
Heckscher to determine that the information submitted is
adequate and to approve Division of Land 76-1 subject to the
conditions set forth in Planning Commission Resolution
PC 76-3-16-1 including the modifications of Conditions 6
and 11 as set forth hereinabove. The motion carried by the
following vote:
AYES: Councilmen McDowell, Friess and Heckscher
NOES: Mayor Nash
ABSENT: Councilman Sweeney
Division of Land 76-2 (McCabe -Sweeney):
It was moved by Councilman McDowell and seconded by Councilman
Heckscher to determine that the information submitted is
adequate and to approve Division of Land 76-2 subject to the
conditions set forth in Planning Commission Resolution
PC 76-3-16-2 including the modifications of Conditions 6 and
11 as set forth hereinabove. The motion carried by the following
vote:
-10- 6/2/76
AYES: Councilmen McDowell, Friess and Heckscher
NOES: Mayor Nash
ABSENT: Councilman Sweeney
Division of Laud 76-3 (Coastal Developers):
It was move y ounci man I owe an seconded by Councilman
Heckscher to determine that the information submitted is
adequate and to approve Division of Land 76-3 subject to the
conditions set forth in Planning Commission Resolution
PC 76-3-16-3 including the modifications of Conditions 6 and
11 as set forth hereinabove. The motion carried by the
following vote:
AYES: Councilmen McDowell, Friess and Heckscher
NOES: Mayor Nash
ABSENT: Councilman Sweeney
Division of Land 76-6 (King):
It was moved by Councilman McDowell and seconded by Councilman
Heckscher to determine that the information submitted is
adequate and to approve Division of Land 76-6 subject to the
conditions set forth in Planning Commission Resolution
pC 76-3-16-4 including the modifications of Conditions 6 and
11 as set forth hereinabove. The motion carried by the
following vote:
AYES: Councilmen McDowell, Friess and Heckscher
NOES: ,Myyor Nash
ABSENT: Councilman Sweeney
Councilman Sweeney returned to the dais.
TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
1. INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL -
INTERSECTION GF DEL OBISPO STREET AND BLUE FIN DRIVE
(82) Council received copies of a report dated June 2, 1976, from
George Alvarez, Traffic Engineer, forwarding the recommendation
of the Traffic and Transportation Commission regarding t1te
feasibility of installing a traffic signal at the intersection
of Del Obispo Street and Blue Fin Drive and providing informa-
tion on a study of traffic approach conditions. The Director
of Public Works advised that a letter had been received from
Orange County stating that funding of the signal has been
included in the traffic signal installation program for
fiscal year 1976-77. The estimated cost of the signal installa-
tion of $35,000 will be shared equally by the County and the
City.
It was moved by Councilman Heckscher, seconded by Mayor Nash
and unanimously carried to approve the installation of a
traffic signal at the intersection of Del Obispo Street and
Blue Fin Drive, that funds be allocated for the installation
in the 1976-77 Traffic Safety Fund, and that staff be directed
to immediately prepare plans and specifications upon adoption
of the 1976-77 fiscal budget.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 12:10 A.M., June 3, 1976, to the
-11- 6/2/76
185
next meeting; date of Wednesday, June 9, 1976, at 7;00 P.M. in
the City Council Chamber for the purpose of further consideration
of the June 2, 1976, Agenda and for commencement of 1976-77
fiscal budget discussions.
APPROVED:
••GLAS i N#`' MAYOR
Respectfully submitted,
11 - =-11 OVER- CITY CLER
-12- 6/2/76