91-0402_CC_Minutes_Regular MeetingAPRIL 2, 1991
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA
The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of San Juan
Capistrano, California was called to order by Mayor Friess at 7:07
p.m. in the City Council Chamber, followed by the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag. Invocation was given by Mayor Friess.
ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Kenneth E. Friess, Mayor
Lawrence F. Buchheim, Councilman
Gary L. Hausdorfer, Councilman
Gil Jones, Councilman
Jeff Vasquez, Councilman
ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Stephen B. Julian, City Manager; Thomas Clark,
Acting City Attorney; Cheryl Johnson, City Clerk; George
Scarborough, Assistant City Manager; David Bentz, Director of
Administrative Services; William M. Huber, Director of Engineering
and Building Services; Ronald C. Sievers, Director of Public Lands
and Facilities; Thomas Tomlinson, Acting Director of Planning
Services; Al King, Director of Community Services; Nancy Bernardi,
Recording Secretary.
MINUTES
Adjourned Regular Meeting of March 12 1991:
It was moved by Councilman Hausdorfer, seconded by Councilman
Buchheim, that the Minutes of the Adjourned Regular Meeting of
March 12, 1991, be approved as submitted. The motion carried by
the following vote:
AYES: Councilmen Jones, Hausdorfer, Buchheim,
Vasquez, and Mayor Friess
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Regular Meeting of March 19 1991:
It was moved by Councilman Hausdorfer, seconded by Councilman
Buchheim, that the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 19,
1991, be approved as submitted. The motion carried by the
following vote:
-1-
4/2/91
AYES: Councilmen Jones, Hausdorfer, Buchheim,
Vasquez, and Mayor Friess
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Adiourned Regular Meeting of March 21 1991:
It was moved by Councilman Hausdorfer, seconded by Councilman
Buchheim, that the Minutes of the Adjourned Regular Meeting of
March 21, 1991, be approved as submitted. The motion carried by
the following vote:
AYES: Councilmen Jones, Vasquez, and Mayor Friess
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: Councilmen Buchheim and Hausdorfer
ABSENT: None
MOTION TO READ BY TITLE ONLY
It was moved by Councilman Buchheim, seconded by Councilman Jones,
and unanimously carried that all Ordinances be read by title only.
PRESENTATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS
1. PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING APRIL 20 AND 21, 1991, AS STATEWIDE
TRAIL DAYS (610.40)
Written Communication:
Report dated April 2, 1991, from the City Clerk, forwarding
the Proclamation.
Approval and Presentation of Proclamation:
After reading the Proclamation in full declaring April 20 and
April 21, 1991, as Statewide Trail Days, the Mayor presented
the Proclamation to Ilse Byrnes, Chairman of the Equestrian
and Recreation Trails Commission.
2. PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING SOUTH COUNTY COMMUNITY CLINIC
(610.40) -.
Written Communication:
Report dated April 2, 1991, from the City Clerk, forwarding
the Proclamation.
-2-
4/2/91
115
Approval and Presentation of Proclamation:
After reading the Proclamation in full, the Mayor presented
the Proclamation to Brian McInerney, member of the Board of
Directors for the clinic. The Mayor commended the clinic for
their contribution to the community.
3. PRESENTATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAW FIRM RELATIVE TO SAN
JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR EIR LEGAL ISSUES
(SHUTE. MIHALY AND WEINBERGER) (800.50)
Councilman Buchheim left the Council Chamber due to a
conflict of interest in this matter. Councilman Hausdorfer
noted that he had received a written ruling from the FPPC
allowing him to participate in discussions and decisions in
this matter without conflict of interest.
The Council was scheduled to receive a presentation from the
law firm of Shute, Mihaly and Weinberger regarding the City's
potential success in pursuing a legal option to have the
Corridor's EIR de -certified. However, the firm declined to
participate due to a conflict of interest.
Written Communications:
(1) Memorandum dated April 2, 1991, from the Acting Planning
Director, forwarding a summary of the adopted Mitigation
Monitoring Program (MMP) for the Corridor. Specific
measures were included in the MMP which staff felt would
substantially reduce adverse impacts to the City
regarding traffic/circulation, noise, and visual
resources.
(2) Letter dated March 28, 1991, from the Deputy Director
of Design and Construction for the Transportation
Corridor Agencies, forwarding the Agency's MMP and the
findings for a Statement of overriding Considerations.
Bruce Tepper, a partner in the law firm of Kane, Ballmer &
Berkman (who presented a proposal to the City Council at the
Adjourned Regular Meeting of March 21, 1991, regarding the
City's potential success in pursuing a legal option to have
the Corridor's EIR de -certified), stated that his firm was
ready to file a complaint on the City's behalf within the
remaining 11 -day period. He felt that the City's chances
would be good for filing a lawsuit on the basis of
deficiencies in the EIR and noted that the Environmental
Protection Agency also believes the EIR to be deficient.
Mr. Tepper felt that certain studies had not been performed
in the EIR that addressed traffic impacts to the City. He
felt that in the short term the lawsuit could prevent the
Corridor from being constructed in its present form but would
not halt its construction indefinitely. Mr. Tepper
-3-
4/2/91
emphasized that should the City win the lawsuit, it could not
force a judge to mandate the construction of Alternate #2 of
the Corridor but only show that Alternate #2 was more
feasible and viable.
Mayor Friess stated that at his request staff had formulated
a mitigation program for inclusion in the Final EIR that
would substantially reduce Alternate #11s adverse impacts to
the City.
Mr. Huber explained that the mitigation program included a
program for monitoring all of the intersections in the Study
Area, Agency participation in funding for public improvements
should intersections exceed traffic limits, 100% Agency
funding to mitigate aesthetic impacts to Rancho Viejo Road,
and a provision to allow the City to work with homeowner
associations to help mitigate specific impacts to those
areas. The Agency would also allow the City flexibility
regarding the appearance of sound walls. Mr. Huber felt that
most of the concerns expressed by the City with regard to
Alternate #1 were satisfactorily mitigated by the Agency
during the recent discussions with staff.
In response to concerns expressed by Councilman Vasquez
regarding the City's costs for these mitigation measures,
Mr. Huber explained that the EIR's estimates represent the
engineering costs for the total construction of the Corridor
and do not address the City's portion of costs for the
mitigation measures. The Agency would submit an annual
report to the City which would identify the City's portion
of the costs for public improvements. Councilman Vasquez
felt that the costs for mitigation measures should be
included in the EIR. Mayor Friess noted that actual costs
would not be determined until the final project goes to bid.
Although this item was not a public hearing, the Mayor opened
the discussion to public input, and the following comments
were received:
(1) Bob King, 29422 Spotted Bull Way, felt that Councilman
Hausdorfer should not participate in discussions of this
matter because of previous abstentions. Mr. King spoke
in favor of the City filing a lawsuit to protect the
City from the adverse impacts of the Corridor.
(2) Phillip Weisberg, 31196 Via San Vicente, spoke in favor
of the City expending funds to pursue the lawsuit.
(3) Patricia Spence, 29267 Country Hills Road, invited the
City Council to view her surrounding neighborhood in
person to understand its uniqueness to the City. She
-4-
4/2/91
voiced concern about loss of property values due to the
construction of the Corridor and asked that the City
Council consider filing the lawsuit.
Mayor Friess noted that the City has been involved in the
planning process for the Corridor for 15 years and advised
that the City reached an informal agreement with the Agency
over the past four years regarding the preference for
Alternate #2. However, because of strong political influen-
ces from the newly formed cities of Mission Viejo and Laguna
Niguel, Alternate #1 became the route of choice by the
Agency. Thus, the Agency Board voted 10-1 in favor of
Alternate #1. Because of overwhelming support for Alternate
#1, the Mayor felt that the most effective way to reduce the
adverse impacts to the City would be for City staff to
develop mitigation measures that could be included in the
Final EIR. In addition, he noted that other cities have
stated their willingness to work with the City to reduce the
impacts on San Juan Capistrano. Mayor Friess stated that he
did not support a lawsuit at this time because he felt the
construction of the Corridor cannot be stopped, only delayed,
and that the City would not gain any mitigations through a
lawsuit.
Councilman Jones noted that a mailer was distributed with his
phone number on it urging residents to call him to support
the lawsuit; he received only one call. He stated that he
would not support the filing a lawsuit because of the City's
insufficient resources.
Councilman Hausdorfer concurred with Councilman Jones'
statement. He felt that the mitigation measures could be
made favorable to the City and that the City should pursue
solutions to its concerns through negotiation with the Agency
instead of filing a lawsuit.
Councilman Vasquez read a comment from the Environmental
Protection Agency stating that the Corridor's EIR is one of
the worst documents the EPA has seen in that it did not
address the cumulative impacts of all three proposed corri-
dors upon air quality. He felt that in addition to the
Corridor having a large impact upon the City, it would be a
transportation and environmental failure and would not solve
the South County's circulation problems. He felt that the
City should file the lawsuit immediately as an obligation to
protect the property rights of residents and quality of life.
He believed that the construction of the Corridor might be
stopped and that the City could gain mitigation funds through
the lawsuit.
-5-
4/2/91
Decision to Not Enter into Lawsuit:
It was moved by Councilman Jones and sec ided by Councilman
Hausdorfer that the City not instigate a ; wsuit at this time
with regard to the Corridor. The r ,tion passed with
Councilman Vasquez voting in oppositiin and Councilman
Buchheim absent.
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Councilman Hausdorfer, se_onded by Councilman
Buchheim, that the staff recommendations be accepted for the
following items listed on the Consent Calendar. The motion
carried by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmen Jones, Hausdorfer, Buchheim,
Vasquez, and Mayor Friess
NOES: None
41"30 Do Z0�Z=.,
1. APPROVAL OF WARRANTS (300.30)
The List of Demands dated March 21, 1991, in the total amount
of $16,022,025.62, was approved as submitted. Councilman
Hausdorfer abstained on Warrants Nos. 29630, 30080, and 30081
due to a possible conflict of interest.
REPORT OF DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION ACTIONS (410.60)
The Report dated April 2, 1991, from the Acting Director of
Planning, regarding actions taken at the meeting of March 20,
1991, was ordered received and filed.
REPORT OF EQUESTRIAN AND RECREATION TRAILS COMMISSION ACTIONS
(930.40)
The Report dated April 2, 1991, from the Director of Commun-
ity Services, regarding actions taken at the meeting of
March 11, 1991, was ordered received anc filed.
4. REPORT OF PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSIO- ACTIONS (920.20)
The Report dated April 2, 1991, from the D -ector of Commun-
ity Services, regarding actions taken a the meeting of
March 18, 1991, was ordered received and Led.
-6-
4/2/91
119
5. REPORT OF PLANNING COMKISSION ACTIONS (440.40)
The Report dated April 2, 1991, from the Acting Director of
Planning, regarding actions taken at the meeting of March 26,
1991, was ordered received and filed.
6. PROPOSED VACATATION OF HIKING/EQUESTRIAN TRAIL LOTS 1 AND
2 TRACT 10090 (26031 VIA ARBOLEDA AND 26101 VIA PASTORAL)
AND PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP 108/18 (31769 AGUACATE ROAD)
(LUPINACCI/COONTZ/MACKENZIE) (670.50)
As set forth in the Report dated April 2, 1991, from the
Director of Engineering and Building, the Resolution
regarding a proposal to vacate the hiking/ equestrian easement
within Lots 1 and 2 of Tract 10090 and Parcel 3 of Parcel Map
108/18, was not adopted in order to retain the ability to
provide trail access for future residents of Via Pastoral.
LICENSE AGREEMENT ALLOWING PORTION OF SOUTH COAST WATER
DISTRICT WATER LINE EASEMENT TO CROSS OVER CITY EASEMENT -
PARCELS 5 AND 6. PARCEL MAP 87-253 (PRICE COMPANY) (600.301
As set forth in the Report dated April 2, 1991, from the
Director of Engineering and Building, the Agreement and Grant
of License was approved, allowing the South Coast Water
District to construct and maintain water lines in a portion
of the City easement located in the Price Club area. The
Mayor was authorized to execute the document on behalf of the
City for forwarding to the Orange County Recorder.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. AMENDMENT TO SECTION 9-3.611 OF TITLE 9 OF THE MUNICIPAL
CODE - HOME OCCUPATIONS (CONTINUED) (420.30)
Proposal:
Consideration of revisions to present regulations pertaining
to Home Occupation Permits. This hearing was continued from
the meeting of March 5, 1991, to ensure that all necessary
legal requirements were properly met with regarding to
notification.
Written Communication:
Report dated April 2, 1991, from the Acting Director of
Planning, forwarding the proposed regulations and summarizing
the goals set by staff in revising the present standards.
Mr. Tomlinson made an oral presentation.
-7-
4/2/91
Public Hearing:
Notice having been given as required by law, Mayor Friess
opened the Public Hearing, and the following persons
responded:
(1) Robert Eppers, 27832 Via Soncha, an electrical contrac-
tor, cited concerns relative to restricting commercial
vehicle length to 20 feet. Mr. Tomlinson stated that
the Ordinance's Exception Clause could allow for the
vehicle's minor length violation if all of the criteria
is met under this clause. Mr. Tomlinson explained that
a commercial vehicle is identified by its signage and
not by its commercial license plates.
(2) David Swerdlin, 26172 Via de Toledo, inquired about
Section B(5) restricting customers coming to the home.
Mr. Tomlinson explained that if there are no noise
and/or traffic impacts as determined by the neighbors,
there would be no violation. He noted, however, that
the Code Enforcement Officer would make the final
determination and explained the enforcement procedure.
(3) Jill Yamada of Capistrano Lock and Safe, 31952 Del
Obispo Street, received confirmation that radio
dispatching from her home would still be allowed under
the new regulations. She felt that the new regulations
would encourage people to pursue their home occupations
without a permit in part due to restrictions regarding
commercial vehicles.
(4) Patricia Spence, 29267 Country Hills Road, felt that the
new regulations are ambiguous and suggested that some
of the residents' concerns be addressed specifically.
(5) Jim Klinger, 26431 Calle Lucana, owner of Modern Tree
Service, commended City staff on the revised regulations
but suggested that Section B(5) of the proposed ordin-
ance be re-examined. He questioned a) whether the new
regulations would allow him to talk with his employees
at his house after work, or if these meetings would be
considered "frequent;" 2) how the Code Enforcement
Officer would be able to determine if meetings were
personal or business related; and 3) if his son and
brother-in-law would be considered employees who were
"meeting" with him. He further stated that due to the
proposed regulations he would remove the sign from one
of his trucks at night, both of which are too large to
be parked in his garage. He noted that someone who
worked for another company would be allowed to park a
commercial vehicle without restriction.
WE
4/2/91
121
(6) William Eggert, 28086 Via del Cerro, felt that the
proposed Ordinance was "un-American" and that the City
did not have the right to tell him how to use his
property.
(7) Louis Want, 26432 Calle Lucana, spoke in favor of the
proposed Ordinance.
(8) Ed Chermak, 32231 Avenida los Amigos, spoke in favor of
the proposed Ordinance so that the residential character
of neighborhoods would be protected.
There being no further input, the hearing was declared closed
with the right to reopen at any time.
Mr. Julian suggested that Section B(10) of the proposed
Ordinance be revised to clarify how vehicles are to be
measured.
Council Discussion:
In response to Councilman Hausdorfer Mr. Tomlinson explained
that because of the number of complaints received by the City
regarding home occupations, the regulations needed to be more
clearly defined and made more specific. He noted that 9-10%
of complaints received by the City are home occupation
related. Councilman Hausdorfer felt that it would be
difficult to enforce some of the violations and that home
businesses should cooperate with neighbors. He emphasized
that the new regulations should not be used as a tool for
harassment.
Councilman Vasquez voiced opposition to the proposed Ordin-
ance, stating there are some ambiguities that need to be
addressed, e.g. vehicle and home interior measurements. He
felt the regulations as presently written would force some
home occupation permit holders to "go underground" and not
apply for a business license or pay sales taxes.
Certification of Negative Declaration:
It was moved by Councilman Hausdorfer and seconded by
Councilman Jones and carried with Councilman Vasquez voting
in the negative that the issuance of a Negative Declaration
be certified on the proposed amendment.
Approval of Home Occupation Revisions:
The City Manager read the title of the Ordinance next in
order. Further reading of all Ordinances had been waived
earlier in the meeting. It was moved by Councilman
Hausdorfer, seconded by Councilman Jones, that the following
Ordinance be introduced, with the following amendments:
-9-
4/2/91
2.
(1) Section B(5) shall be revised to determine what
constitutes "frequent" business-related meetings
or gatherings.
(2) Section B(10) shall be revised to clarify how
vehicles are to be measured.
REVISING HOME OCCUPATION REGULATIONS - AN ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA,
REVISING SECTION 9-3.611 ENTITLED "HOME OCCUPATION"
TO TITLE 9 "LAND USE" OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmen Jones, Hausdorfer, Buchheim,
and Mayor Friess
NOES: Councilman Vasquez
ABSENT: None
Proposal:
Consideration of a amendment to the Developer Fee and Deposit
Resolution to provide the City with clear authority to ensure
the collection of environmental review fees on behalf of the
California Department of Fish and Game. The fees include a
$1,300 fee for the review of a Negative Declaration and a
$900 fee for review of an Environmental Impact Report, as
part of the development application review process.
Written Communication:
Report dated April 2, 1991, from the Acting Director of
Planning, reviewing concerns of staff and other options
considered.
Mr. Tomlinson made an oral presentation.
Public Hearing:
Notice having been given as required by law, Mayor Friess
opened the Public Hearing, and there being no response,
closed the hearing with the -fight to reopen at any time.
-10-
4/2/91
3.
123
Approval of Fee Schedule Revisions:
It was moved by Councilman Buchheim, seconded by Councilman
Hausdorfer, that the following Resolution be adopted revising
the fee schedule to provide the City with statutory authority
to collect state -mandated environmental review fees on behalf
of the California Department of Fish and Game:
RESOLUTION NO. 91-4-2-1. AMENDING DEVELOPMENT FEES
FOR PROCESSING DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS TO INCLUDE
GAME DEPARTMENT - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING DEVELOPMENT FEES FOR THE PROCESSING OF
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS TO ADD FEES FOR COMPLIANCE
WITH REQUIREMENT FOR REVIEW BY STATE FISH AND GAME
DEPARTMENT
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmen Jones, Hausdorfer, Buchheim,
Vasquez, and Mayor Friess
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
C AND D (THE LUSK COMPANY) (430.30)
Proposal:
Consideration of a request for a waiver regarding conditions
of approval under Comprehensive Development Plan 81-2,
Housing Opportunities Program.
Applicant
The Lusk Company
17550 Gilette Avenue
P.O. Box C-19560
Irvine, CA 92713
Written Communication:
Report dated April 2, 1991, from the City Manager, recommend-
ing that the hearing be continued to the meeting of April 16,
1991, to allow additional time for discussion of legal
interpretations with the interim City Attorney, staff, and
the applicant regarding the requirements of the conditions
of approval.
-11-
4/2/91
Public Hearing:
Notice having been given as required by law, Mayor Friess
opened the Public Hearing, and there was no response.
Continuation of Public Hearing:
It was moved by Councilman Buchheim, seconded by Councilman
Hausdorfer, and unanimously carried that the hearing be
continued to the meeting of April 16, 1991.
RECESS AND RECONVENE
Council recessed at 9:10 p.m. to convene the San Juan Capistrano
Community Redevelopment Agency, and reconvened at 9:12 p.m.
ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS
CITY MANAGER
1. CITY ATTORNEY CONTRACT (ROURKE & WOODRUFF/SHAW) (600.30)
Written Communication:
Report dated April 2, 1991, from the City Manager, forwarding
a proposed contract between the City and Rourke & Woodruff
for provision of legal services by the former City Attorney
John Shaw on several pending legal matters.
Mr. Julian made an oral presentation.
Councilman Vasquez suggested that the City monitor the
anticipated costs for handling pending litigation so that
costs can be controlled. Mr. Julian indicated that he would
submit estimates of attorneys fees.
Approval of Contract:
It was moved by Councilman Hausdorfer, seconded by Councilman
Buchheim, and unanimously carried that the Agreement for
Legal Services with Rourke & Woodruff for interim legal
services be approved for specified matters, at the rates of
$135 per hour for advisory work and $150 per hour for
litigation.
2. COMMISSION STANDARDS (110.10
Written Communication:
Report dated April 2, 1991, from the Council Services
Manager, noting that this item was continued from the meeting
of March 19, 1991.
Mayor Friess submitted a proposal recommending that a City
policy be established addressing commission and board
attendance at their respective meetings, noting that some
-12-
4/2/91
3.
125
members have had extended periods of absence. The policy
would restrict absences for all meetings for health reasons
only and require that the secretary of the board/commission
be notified in advance. All other absences would be deemed
unexcused.
To improve the selection process of board/commission members,
Councilman Jones suggested that _kU applicants for a board
or commission vacancy be interviewed by a subcommittee
comprised of two Council members. The importance of atten-
dance would be emphasized at these interviews. Councilman
Hausdorfer recommended that a person applying for a number
of commissions be interviewed only once.
It was the consensus of the Council that the matter be
continued to the meeting of April 16, 1991.
Written Communication:
Report dated April 2, 1991, from the Community Development
Assistant, recommending that the block grant application be
amended to allow for the rehabilitation of both houses and
mobile homes throughout the City since allocated funds for
improvements to Los Rios Street could not be used within the
specified timeframe.
Jeffrey Parker, Assistant to the City Manager, made an oral
presentation.
Approval to Amend Contracts:
It was moved by Councilman Hausdorfer,
Buchheim, and unanimously carried
No. 26270 be amended for $37,000 for
housing and mobile homes Citywide, an,
No. C40189 be approved to reprogram
mobile home rehabilitation.
COUNCILMANIC ITEMS
seconded by Councilman
that Year 5 Contract
the rehabilitation of
i that Year 11 Contract
funds for housing and
1. APPOINTMENT OF ONE MEMBER TO THE LOS RIOS REVIEW COMMITTEE
(110.20)
Written Communication:
Report dated April 2, 1991, from the Council Services
Manager, noting that the vacancy had been advertised and two
applications were received.
-13-
4/2/91
Councilman Vasquez nominated Michael Palmer, and Councilman
Hausdorfer nominated Francie Perguson.
It was the consensus of the Council that a subcommittee ^
comprised of Councilman Buchheim and Mayor Friess interview
both nominees, with a recommendation for appointment sched-
uled for the meeting of April 16, 1991.
2. DESIGNATING THE CAPISTRANO VALLEY ARTS COUNCIL AS AN OFFICIAL
COORDINATING BODY FOR THE ARTS (130.80)
Written Communication:
Report dated April 2, 1991, from the Director of Community
Services, summarizing the mission statement and goals for the
Capistrano Valley Arts Council and listing its active
participants.
Designation of Arts Council:
It was moved by Councilman Buchheim, seconded by Councilman
Jones, and unanimously carried that the Capistrano Valley
Arts Council be designated as an official coordinating body
for local arts programs.
3. ORAL REPORTS OF OUTSIDE AGENCIES
a. San Juan Basin Authority (1050.60)
Councilman Buchheim noted the meeting held April 2,
1991, and reported that a savings of $4,000-$5,000 was
lost as a result of rainwater wasted during recent
storms. He stated that the agency was moving forward
with the dam project.
b. League of California Cities (140.20)
Councilman Hausdorfer stated that he would not be able
to attend the meeting next week. Councilman Vasquez and
Mayor Friess volunteered to attend in his place.
Mayor Friess noted a letter received from the League
requesting support for Senate Bill 169, which would roll
back the fees imposed on the City by the County for jail
bookings. It was the consensus of the Council that the
City write a letter to Marian Bergeson in support of the
bill.
-14-
4/2/91
127
COUNCIL COMMENTS
1. STAFF COMMENDATION (730.90)
Council commended staff for their efforts and excellent
response during the March Heritage Festival events and the
Dana Mesa landslide. Councilman Jones expressed appreciation
for the installation of the new Dance Hall floor.
2. SIGN CONTROL ENFORCEMENT (410.40)
Mayor Friess requested code enforcement for the display of
flags at the leasing office at the Spaulding development,
McDonald's advertising, and the Korean sign on the hillside
at Via Escolar and Rancho Viejo Road.
CLOSED SESSION
Council recessed to a Closed Session at 9:35 p.m. for discussion
of legal matters pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a)
(Romer v. City and Committee to Restore Integrity v. individuals),
the City Clerk being excused therefrom, and reconvened at 10:20
p.m.
There being no further business before the Council, the meeting
was adjourned at 10:20 p.m. to Tuesday, April 9, 1991, at 7:00
p.m. in the San Juan Hot Springs Dance Hall.
ATTEST:
KENNETH E. FRIES9, MAXOR
Respectfully submitted,
CHERYL JOHNSCH, CITY CLERK
-15-
4/2/91