92-0421_CC_Minutes_Regular Meeting1[p 4'7
APRIL 21, 1992
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA
The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of San Juan
Capistrano, California was called to order by Mayor Jones at 7:00
p.m. in the City Council Chamber, followed by the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag. Invocation was given by Councilman
Hausdorfer.
ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Gil Jones, Mayor
Kenneth E. Friess, Councilman
Jerry Harris, Councilman
Gary L. Hausdorfer, Councilman
Jeff Vasquez, Councilman
ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Stephen B. Julian, City Manager; Richard K.
Denhalter, City Attorney; Cheryl Johnson, City Clerk; George
Scarborough, Assistant City Manager; David Bentz, Director of
Administrative Services; William M. Huber, Director of Engineering
and Building Services; Thomas Tomlinson, Director of Planning
Services; Al King, Jr., Director of Community Services; Ronald C.
Sievers, Director of Public Lands and Facilities; Nancy Bernardi,
Recording Secretary.
MINUTES
It was moved by Councilman Harris, seconded by Councilman Vasquez,
that the Minutes of the Adjourned Regular Meeting of March 31,
1992, be approved as submitted. The motion carried by the
following vote:
AYES: Councilmen Friess, Harris,
Vasquez, and Mayor Jones
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: Councilman Hausdorfer
ABSENT: None
Regular Meeting of April 7, 1992:
It was moved by Councilman Harris, seconded by Councilman Vasquez,
that the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of April 7, 1992, be
approved as submitted. The motion carried by the following vote:
-1-
4/21/92
AYES: Councilmen Friess, Harris, Hausdorfer,
Vasquez, and Mayor Jones
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
MOTION TO READ BY TITLE ONLY
It was moved by Councilman Hausdorfer, seconded by Councilman
Friess, and unanimously carried that all Ordinances be read by
title only.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (CITY COUNCIL/COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY)
1. REQUEST FOR STREET NAME CHANGE (820.20)
Mike Yeager, 27526 Paseo Verano, Vice President of the Loma
Vista Homeowners Association, submitted a petition requesting
that the neighborhood loop street currently named Cerro
Rebal, be changed back to the original Spanish name, Via Del
Prado.
Councilman Hausdorfer noted that the street was named in
honor of Dick Rebal, an executive with Glendale Federal. Mr.
Huber indicated that the Department of Engineering and
Building is currently reviewing the petition, and a report
will be submitted to the City Council at a future meeting.
Councilman Friess suggested that staff identify alternative
ways of honoring Mr. Rebal.
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Councilman Hausdorfer, seconded by Councilman
Harris, that the staff recommendations be accepted for the
following items listed on the Consent Calendar. The motion
carried by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmen Friess, Harris, Hausdorfer,
Vasquez, and Mayor Jones
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
CITY TREASURER'S REPORT OF INVESTMENTS AS OF MARCH 31. 1992
(350.30)
The City Treasurer's Report of Investments as of March 31,
1992, in the total amount of $17,085,713.84 was received and
filed.
-2-
4/21/92
24
REPORT OF CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMISSION ACTIONS (910.6
The Report dated April 21, 1992, from the Senior Management
Assistant, regarding actions taken at the meeting of April 7,
1992, was ordered received and filed.
REPORT OF DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION ACTIONS (410.601
The Report dated April 21, 1992, from the Director of
Planning Services, regarding actions taken at the meeting of
April 1, 1992, was ordered received and filed.
4. REPORT OF PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION ACTIONS (920.20)
The Report dated April 21, 1992, from the Director of
Community Services, regarding actions taken at the meeting of
March 30, 1992, was ordered received and filed.
5. REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS (440.40)
The Report dated April 21, 1992, from the Director of
Planning Services, regarding actions taken at the meeting of
April 14, 1992, was ordered received and filed.
PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS. AND AUTHORIZATION TO RECEIVE BIDS -
SACARAMA AREA STORM DRAIN (600.301
As set forth in the Report dated April 21, 1992, from the
Director of Engineering and Building, the plans and specifi-
cations were approved for the construction of a 30 -inch
diameter storm drain from the Chou property above Sacarama
Lane through the Gregg, Vaughn, McCook, Groenendyke, and
Marquis properties to the existing 42 -inch diameter storm
drain in Via Estelita. The homeowners shall contribute 508
or $45,000 of the project costs, whichever is less. Staff
was authorized to call for bids. Easements and license
agreements will be brought to the City Council for approval
and acceptance prior to bid opening.
7. PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS. AND AUTHORIZATION TO RECEIVE BIDS -
PREVENTATIVE STREET MAINTENANCE. 1991-92 (600.30)
As set forth in the Report dated April 21, 1992, from the
Director of Engineering and Building, the plans and specifi-
cations were approved for the following three Preventative
Street Maintenance projects for 1991-92:
(1) Reconstruction of the north side of Del Obispo Street
from Alipaz Street to Trabuco Creek Bridge;
(2) Asphalt concrete overlay of Avenida Aeropuerto, includ-
ing pavement reinforcing fabric from Camino Capistrano
to the railroad tracks; and
-3-
4/21/92
(3) Asphalt concrete overlay of Dana Mesa Drive, including
pavement reinforcing fabric from Del Obispo Street to
Deadwood Drive and slurry sealing the remainder of the
Dana Mesa tract.
Staff was authorized to call for bids.
AWARD OF CONTRACT - TWO-PART PROJECT CONSISTING OF A)
REHABILITATION OF SILVER CREEK DRIVE AT HORNO CREEK: AND B)
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. MISSION STREET TO RAMOS STREET (IAS
ANGELES ENGINEERING. INC.) (600.30)
As set forth in the Report dated April 21, 1992, from the
Director of Engineering and Building, the contract for the
rehabilitation of Silver Creek Drive at Horno Creek and
drainage improvements for Mission Street to Ramos Street was
awarded to the lowest responsible bidder, Los Angeles
Engineering, Inc., in the amount of $67,610. The bid
irregularity was waived, and all other bids were rejected.
The Mayor and City Clerk were authorized to execute the
contract on behalf of the City.
9. DENIAL OF CLAIM - PROPERTY DAMAGE (SAM FRIEDMAN) (170.10)
The claim received by the City on April 3, 1992, from Sam
Friedman in the amount of $1,995.48, for damage sustained to
his RV from hitting a overhanging branch on Paseo Adelanto,
was denied, as set forth in the Report dated April 21, 1992,
from the City Attorney.
10. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING DESTRUCTION OF RECORDS (160.70)
As set forth in the Report dated April 21, 1992, from the
City Clerk, the following Resolution was adopted authorizing
the destruction of records listed in Exhibit A of the
Resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 92-4-21-1, DESTRUCTION OF RECORDS -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE
DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN RECORDS
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1.
LOCATED NORTH OF AVENIDA LOS CERRITOS AND WEST OF RANCHO
VIEJO ROAD REZONE 89-1 (SOUTH COAST CHRISTIAN ASSEMBLY)
(460.20)
Proposal•
Consideration of a request to rezone a 3.3 -acre parcel from
AG (General Agriculture) to IP (Public and Institutional),
-4-
4/21/92
251
and to cancel the Williamson Act contract for agricultural
preserve. The applicant proposes to establish a church
(South Coast Christian Assembly) on the site, which is
located north of Avenida Los Cerritos and west of Rancho
Viejo Road.
Applicant:
South Coast Christian Assembly
Mr. Dave Wyatt
P.O. Box 4647
Mission Viejo, CA 92690
Property Owner:
Mr. Jarold B. Cole
31501 Avenida Los Cerritos
San Juan Capistrano, CA 92690
Written Communications:
(1) Report dated April 21, 1992, from the Director of
Planning Services, recommending denial of the rezone and
cancellation of the Williamson Act contract. The Report
summarized the history of the project and the following
issues cited by staff and the Planning Commission:
inconsistency with the Circulation Element of the
General Plan, incompatibility with the semi -rural
neighborhood (noise and traffic impacts), lack of a safe
and adequate access to the site, and inappropriateness
of terminating the Williamson Act Agricultural Preserve
contract if the zoning remains AG. The report stated
that access to the site from Avenida Los Cerritos would
be inadvisable due to traffic concerns and impacts at
the intersection of Los Cerritos and Ortega Highway. An
interim agreement for access over the Honeyman property
to the site from Rancho Viejo Road was rejected by the
Honeymans; and staff opposed the option to have the City
acquire the Honeyman easement by eminent domain due to
lack of apparent public benefit.
(2) Letter dated April 17, 1992, from Robert A. Marshall,
31531 Avenida Los Cerritos, stating that he had no
objection to the rezone to accommodate a church use.
Exhibits were on display, and Mechelle Lawrence, Assistant
Planner, made an oral presentation.
Public Hearing:
Notice having been given as
opened the Public Hearing, and
ded in favor of the requests:
required by law, Mayor Jones
the following persons respon-
(1) David A. Lurker of Voss, Cook, Casselberry & Thel, legal
counsel for the applicant, discussed the proposed land
use and access issue. He stated that the majority of
-5-
4/21/92
252 ,
the immediate and surrounding residents support the
rezone and proposed church use and noted letters of
support received from the community in general. He felt
that the site's location in an already noise -impacted
area next to the freeway and the nearby commercial uses
made this an appropriate location for the church use.
He stated that the traffic studies submitted by the
applicant concluded that there would be no significant
impact from traffic from this project, with the excep-
tion of peak travel times on Wednesday evenings and
Sunday mornings. Mr. Lurker requested the City's
assistance in resolving the issue of access.
(2) Darrell W. Ward, Senior Pastor of the South Coast
Christian Assembly, 31451 Avenida Los Cerritos, spoke
regarding the difficulty the church has had in trying to
locate an affordable and suitable site for the church in
South Orange County. He felt that the church use would
enhance the overall quality of life in the neighborhood,
in that the church would provide activities and social
services as well as serve the spiritual needs of the
community. He felt that the access issues could be
resolved.
(3) Steven Walker, 31181 Harmony Hall Court, spoke of the
benefits that would be derived from the church, such as
improvement in the quality of life, development of local
social relations, and increased business for local
merchants.
(4) Margot Andrews, 31281 Via Cuartel, spoke regarding the
benefits that would be derived from the church use, such
as social services and the emphasis on families and
youth activities.
(5) J. Paul Spitz, on behalf of United Community Outreach,
33051 Calle Aviador, Suite D, stated that the proposed
church is the type of community -oriented church that is
needed by a community.
The following persons spoke in opposition of the proposed
requests for rezone and cancellation of the Williamson Act
Agreement:
(1) Lenore Hammond, 31441 Avenida Los Cerritos, stated that
the proposed church use would result in the destruction
of the semi -rural character of the neighborhood, a loss
of property value to homes adjacent to the project, and
a substantial increase in traffic congestion. She noted
that there are already six churches with a k -mile radius
of their neighborhood. She recommended that approval
for this project be delayed until a master plan for the
cm
4/21/92
253
Honeyman property is completed and the access issue is
resolved.
(2) Mack Waddell, 31601 Avenida Los Cerritos, requested that
the semi -rural character of the area be preserved. He
stated that the physical layout of the parcel is more
appropriate for a residential use rather than a church
use.
(3) Stewart Honeyman, Vice President of Romarco Realty
Corporation and owner of property abutting three sides
of the Cole property, noted that the applicant was
informed early on in the process by City staff that
access would be the major problem for the church
project. He stated that he was committed to planning
the development of his property in a timely fashion to
produce a project that would be suitable and satisfac-
tory to the community. He felt that approval of the
church use at this time would be premature. He stated
that he is currently working with City staff regarding
the master plan for his property and the issues that
would need to be addressed. He cited concerns that
allowing the project access to Rancho Viejo Road would
trigger the existing Road Reimbursement Agreement for
$150,000 with the City for Rancho Viejo Road.
There being no further input, the hearing was declared closed
with the right to reopen at any time.
Council Comments:
Councilman Hausdorfer supported the staff recommendations to
deny the proposed rezone, stating the issue was introduction
of a different and perhaps incompatible use in the area and
the unresolved issue of access. However, he felt that the
use might be deemed to be appropriate sometime in the future.
He stated it would be wrong to approve the church use and
expect the Honeymans to resolve the access problem.
Councilman Friess stated that other churches in the City were
successfully introduced into older neighborhoods and became
assets to the community. However, he felt that this church
and its related activities would be so successful, access and
traffic circulation would prove to be a major problem. He
noted that existing circulation problems along Ortega Highway
have yet to be resolved. With regard to the eminent domain
alternative by the City, he stated that the City has never
condemned a person's property without their involvement in
the process. He stated he would support the church use only
if the applicant obtained access over the Honeyman property
to Rancho Viejo Road.
Councilman Vasquez voiced his support for the church use on
this property but felt that the main issue to be resolved
-7-
4/21/92
4
with the project was access. He suggested that City staff
work with the applicant and the Honeymans to resolve the
access issue from Rancho Viejo Road. He requested that the
existing trees on the property be allowed to remain to retain
the agricultural character of the neighborhood.
Councilman Harris voiced his support for the church use but
stated the problem was one of timing. He felt that to make
the applicant wait until the Honeyman master plan is
completed would be unfair since the issue of access could be
resolved in the interim. He cited opposition to the use of
eminent domain by the City and suggested that access could be
granted to Rancho Viejo Road on a voluntary basis until the
Honeyman master plan is developed. He discussed access
concerns from Avenida Los Cerritos and suggested that the
item be continued in order to resolve the matter.
Mr. Huber noted that the traffic studies submitted by the
applicant concluded that service levels at Los Cerritos
during peak travel times would be at a Level E or F, with
traffic from the church use increasing the congestion by
approximately 400 additional trips per day. He advised that
the two main drawbacks to access off Los Cerritos included a
lack of stacking space for the left -turn movements eastbound
from Ortega Highway onto the church property during peak
hours; and the difficulty in maintaining a progression on
Ortega Highway if a traffic signal were installed at Ortega
Highway and Los Cerritos, further noting that Caltrans was
opposed to installing a traffic signal at Avenida Los
Cerritos and Ortega Highway.
Mayor Jones noted that he has always supported church uses in
the City; however, when this project was first submitted to
the Planning Commission the main issue was always access. He
opposed access off Los Cerritos because of the existing
traffic congestion on Ortega Highway but would support the
request for rezone after access is obtained off Rancho Viejo
Road. He suggested that a buffer zone also be provided to
mitigate some of the church's impacts on the surrounding
community.
It was moved by Councilman Hausdorfer and seconded by
Councilman Friess that the proposed Resolution be adopted
denying the proposed rezone and request to cancel the
Agriculture Preserve Contract under the Williamson Act.
After further discussion regarding the access issue, the
motion was withdrawn.
-8-
4/21/92
Agriculture Preserve Contract Under the Williamson Act:
It was moved by Councilman Friess, seconded by Councilman
Vasquez, and unanimously carried that the request for rezone
and cancellation of the Agriculture Preserve Contract under
the Williamson Act be approved, subject to the following
conditions:
(1) Staff shall work with the applicant and the Honeymans to
gain permanent access to the property off Rancho Viejo
Road. The exercise of eminent domain by the City shall
not be used.
(2) The existing terminus of Avenida Los Cerritos shall be
terminated by a cul-de-sac.
(3) Staff was directed to prepare a Resolution for the
May 5th Council meeting, setting forth findings and a
report identifying subsequent actions that would be
necessary to change the circulation.
The motion carried with Councilmen Harris and Hausdorfer
voting in opposition.
The City Attorney noted that should Condition No. 1 not be
resolved, the present zoning of the property would remain in
place. In addition, the findings with regard to consistency
and compatibility would need to be satisfied.
RECESS AND RECONVENE
Council recessed at 8:45 p.m. to convene the San Juan Capistrano
Community Redevelopment Agency, and reconvened at 9:30 p.m.
ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS
CITY MANAGER
1. ANNUAL CITYWIDE CLEAN-UP WEEK - MAY 4 THROUGH 8. 1992
(530.60)
Written Communication:
Report dated April 21, 1992, from the Management Assistant I,
advising that the City's annual Clean -Up Week would be held
May 4 through 8, 1992.
It was moved by Councilman Hausdorfer, seconded by Councilman
Harris, and unanimously carried that the Report be received
and filed.
-9-
4/21/92
2.
AMENDMENT TO TITLE 5 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD CHAPTER 22
REGULATING THE DISPLAY OF MATERIAL WHICH IS HARMFUL TO MINORS
(585.30)
Written Communication:
Report dated April 21, 1992, from the Assistant City Manager, _
forwarding a draft Ordinance restricting and regulating the
display of pornographic magazines and other materials harmful
to minors.
The City Manager read the title of the Ordinance next in
order. Further reading of all Ordinances had been waived
earlier in the meeting. It was moved by Councilman Friess,
seconded by Councilman Harris, that the following Ordinance
be introduced:
PLACEMENT OF ADULT MATERIALS HARMFUL TO MINORS -
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO,
CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 22 TO TITLE 5 OF THE
SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE
PLACEMENT OF MATTER HARMFUL TO MINORS
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmen Friess, Harris, Hausdorfer,
Vasquez, and Mayor Jones
ABSENT: None
Later in the meeting after this item was concluded, Bob and
Rita Skora, 31942 Paseo de Elena, requested that in addition
to the provisions in the draft Ordinance, provisions be
included to restrict minors' access to areas containing such
material and enforcement of the restriction.
Mr. Scarborough stated that he and the City Attorney would
meet with Mr. and Mrs. Skora regarding their concerns.
Written Communication:
Report dated April 21, 1992, from the Assistant City Manager,
recommending that the Third Amendment to the Joint Powers
Agreement for the Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor
Agency be approved to allow the Fourth District Supervisor to
participate on the Agency Board of Directors.
-10-
4/21/92
61
457
Councilman Friess stated that there had not been a lot of
support shown by other member cities and suggested the matter
be tabled until more information is received.
Motion to Table Item:
It was moved by Councilman Hausdorfer, seconded by Councilman
Harris, and unanimously carried that this item be tabled.
DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SERVICES
1. STATUS REPORT ON NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS (440.10)
Written Communication:
Report dated April 21, 1992, from the Director of Planning
Services, advising that six new development applications were
received by the City since the last report of March 17, 1992.
It was moved by Councilman Friess, seconded by Councilman
Vasquez, that the Report be received and filed. The motion
was carried with Councilman Hausdorfer abstaining due to the
proximity of the applications to his residence.
2. INITIATION OF AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT
TO REDESIGNATE A 2.37 -ACRE PARCEL ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
ORTEGA HIGHWAY AND RANCHO VIEJO ROAD FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL
TO A SPECIAL STUDY AREA, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92-2 (PLAZA
DE LAS GOLONDRINAS/BENNINGHOFF) (440.25)
Written Communication:
Report dated April 21, 1992, from the Director of Planning
Services, recommending that consideration of a General Plan
Amendment to the Land Use Element be initiated to redesignate
a 2.37 -acre parcel located on the northeast corner of Ortega
Highway and Rancho Viejo Road from Medium Density Residential
to a Special Study (SS) area. The applicant proposes to
construct a 28,000 -square -foot commercial and office center
with a 4,500 -square -foot restaurant onto four separate
parcels.
Mary Raskin, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report.
Public Comment:
(1) Thomas Merrell, 31726 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 223,
project consultant for the applicant, stated that the
proposed project would consist of mixed uses, 65% of
which would be retail and the balance to consist of
office -type uses. He noted the importance of including
certain uses in order to obtain sufficient financing for
the project. The applicant opposed restrictions on the
retail uses.
(2) The applicant/property owner, Charles F. Benninghoff
III, stated that the proposed buildings would be small
-11-
4/21/92
258
and in scale with an Old Monterey style of architecture
and would hide the existing retaining wall. He
discussed types of businesses and the environment he
envisioned for the area. He stated that the processes
the City would require, especially for an Environmental
Impact Report, would be difficult for him economically
and requested that: 1) the Council state support for
the concept plan and that no percentage of allocations
for the permitted uses be required, 2) the process for
the zoning approvals be completed by August 1992, 3)
Council give their support for the village market, and
4) the proposed General Plan Amendment not be required.
(3) Roy Nunn, 31411 Camino Capistrano, architect for the
project, assured the Council that this would be a first-
class project.
(4) Dave Stolte, commercial real estate broker with Charles
Dunn Properties, stated that there is a need for this
type of project in this area of the City. He discussed
the economic requirements to finance the center._
Councilman Friess cited support of Mr. BenninghoffIs requests
with the exception of the village market. He expressed
concerns about the project's economic viability. He stated
support for getting the project into the process.
In response to Councilman Hausdorfer, Mr. Tomlinson stated
that the current zoning is 1.4 Medium Residential, and the
Land Use Element of the General Plan allows some professional
office to be consistent with the designation, subject to
approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning
Commission. However, since more than 50% of the proposed
square footage is proposed to be office/retail uses, it is no
longer considered a professional office designation and
therefore requires a General Plan Amendment. No additional
time would be required for this process, as it would be
processed concurrently with the zone change and the develop-
ment application. Mr. Tomlinson felt that this process could
be concluded with a recommendation to the City Council by
August 1992.
Councilman Hausdorfer voiced his support for the concept plan
but cited concerns regarding the proposed village market, the
tenant mix and the wide range of uses which might be
encouraged. Councilman Vasquez expressed concern about
circulation along Ortega Highway and questioned whether the
proposed uses would impact too heavily on Ortega Highway.
Initiation of Consideration of General Plan Amendment:
It was moved by Councilman Friess, seconded by Councilman
Hausdorfer, that the following Resolution be adopted with the
provision that staff create a time schedule for evaluating
-12-
4/21/92
and processing this General Plan Amendment, to be expedited
for completion by August 1992:
RESOLUTION NO. 92-4-21-2. INITIATING AMENDMENT TO
THE LAND USE ELEMENT - PLAZA DE LAS GOLONDRINAS/
BENNINGHOFF - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA,
INITIATING AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN LAND
USE ELEMENT TO DESIGNATE A 2.37 -ACRE SITE AT THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF RANCHO VIEJO ROAD AND ORTEGA
HIGHWAY TO SPECIAL STUDY AREA (PLAZA DE LAS
GOLONDRINAS/BENNINGHOFF)
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmen Friess, Harris, Hausdorfer,
Vasquez, and Mayor Jones
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
INITIATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 9-3.415 OF THE MUNICI-
PAL CODE TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL USES IN THE COMMERCIAL
MANUFACTURING DISTRICT (SPAULDING) (420.30)
Written Communication:
Report dated April 21, 1992, from the Director of Planning
Services, recommending that an Amendment to the Land Use
Element of the Municipal Code be initiated to determine
whether additional manufacturing and processing uses should
be allowed within Section 9-3.415 (Commercial Manufacturing --
CM).
Initiation of Consideration of General Plan Amendment:
It was moved by Councilman Hausdorfer, seconded by Councilman
Friess, that the following Resolution be adopted:
RESOLUTION NO. 92-4-21-3. INITIATING AMENDMENT TO
SECTION 9-3.415 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW
ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL USES IN THE COMMERCIAL MANU-
FACTURING DISTRICT (SYCAMORE BUSINESS
PARK/SPAULDING) - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA,
INITIATING AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 9-3.415 OF THE
MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL USES
IN THE COMMERCIAL MANUFACTURING DISTRICT (SYCAMORE
BUSINESS PARK/SPAULDING)
-13-
4/21/92
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmen Friess, Harris, Hausdorfer,
Vasquez, and Mayor Jones
NOES: None -
ABSENT: None
ORDINANCES
AMENDMENT TO TITLE 5. CHAPTER 6 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO INSPECTIONS FOR FARM LABOR CAMPS (ORANGE COUNTY
HEALTH SERVICES) (560.80) (ADOPTION)
Written Communication:
Report dated April 21, 1992, from the City Clerk, advising
that the Ordinance was introduced at the meeting of April 7,
1992, and was scheduled for adoption.
Adoption of Ordinance:
The City Manager read the title of the Ordinance next in
order. Further reading of all Ordinances had been waived
earlier in the meeting. It was moved by Councilman Friess,
seconded by Councilman Hausdorfer, that the following
Ordinance be adopted:
ORDINANCE NO. 701, REGULATING FEES FOR OPERATION
OF FARM LABOR CAMPS - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA, PERTAINING TO
LABOR CAMPS AND ESTABLISHING FEES
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmen Friess, Harris, Hausdorfer,
Vasquez, and Mayor Jones
lhN7��`.[7Ta
ABSENT: None
2. _AMENDMENT TO TITLE 6 CHAPTER 2 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO INSPECTIONS FOR FOOD SERVICES (ORANGE COUNTY
HEALTH SERVICES) (560.80) (ADOPTION)
Written Communication:
Report dated April 21, 1992, from the City Clerk, advising
that the Ordinance was introduced at the meeting of April 7,
1992, and was scheduled for adoption.
Adoption of Ordinance:
The City Manager read the title of the Ordinance next in
order. Further reading of all Ordinances had been waived
-14-
4/21/92
earlier in the meeting. It was moved by Councilman Friess,
seconded by Councilman Hausdorfer, that the following
Ordinance be adopted:
ORDINANCE NO. 702, REVISING REGULATIONS PERTAINING
TO FOOD HANDLING BUSINESSES AND HEALTH SERVICE
FEES - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN
CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA, REVISING REGULATIONS
PERTAINING TO FOOD HANDLING BUSINESSES AND HEALTH
SERVICES FEES
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmen Friess, Harris, Hausdorfer,
Vasquez, and Mayor Jones
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
COUNCILMANIC ITEMS
1. REVIEW OF COUNCIL POLICY NO. 212 - EXPANSION OF DEFINITION OF
EXCUSED ABSENCES (610.30)
Written Communication:
Report dated April 21, 1992, from the Council Services
Manager, recommending that the Council revise Council Policy
No. 212 to expand the definition of "excused" absences for
commission/board members.
Adoption of Revised Policy No. 212:
It was moved by Councilman Friess, seconded by Councilman
Hausdorfer, and unanimously carried that revised Council
Policy No. 212 be adopted expanding the definition of
"excused" absences for commission/board members to include
all absences for which the secretary to the advisory body was
notified in advance of the meeting.
_ORAL REPORTS OF OUTSIDE AGENCIES
None.
COUNCIL COMMENTS
CONSTRUCTION ON VALLE ROAD (610.25
Councilman Friess requested that the Council be advised of
the status of the response to a letter from Colleen Campbell
expressing concerns regarding grading and construction of
property on Valle Road.
-15-
4/21/92
262
2. SOLAG RELOCATION (400.20)
Councilman Friess noted the report from Douglas Dumhart
regarding the status of the Solag relocation. He urged that
staff continue to keep pressure on to resolve the issue and
to find creative mechanisms from which to fund its -
relocation.
3. SLOPE FAILURES (410.80)
Councilman Friess requested an update from staff regarding
the two slides which occurred recently in the City.
4. FAIR POLITICAL PRACTICES COMMISSION/CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
(640.40)
At the request of Councilman Hausdorfer, it was a consensus
of the Council that the City Attorney review and provide a
report on all FPPC rules and regulations for the benefit of
staff and the City Council, particularly with regard to the
completion of complicated forms for the FPPC.
5. CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REGULATIONS (630.50)
At the request of Councilman Hausdorfer, it was a consensus
of the Council that the City Attorney review the City's
campaign contribution limits to comply with Proposition 73
and Federal Court of Appeals rulings before the November 1992
City election.
CLOSED SESSION
None.
There being no further business before the Council, the meeting
was adjourned at 10:20 p.m. to the next regular meeting date of
Tuesday, May 5, 1992, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber.
ATTEST:
`I.G1-L---JONES, MAYOR
Respectfully submitted,
CHERYL JOHN90N,VCITY CLERK
-16-
4/21/92