94-0104_CC_Minutes_Regular Meeting177
JANUARY 4, 1994
' REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA
The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of San Juan Capistrano, California was called to order by
Mayor Campbell at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
Invocation was given by Whitney White of the Baha'i Faith/Local Spiritual Assembly of San Juan Capistrano.
ROLL CALL PRESENT: Collene Campbell, Mayor
Gary L. Hausdorfer, Council Member
Gil Jones, Council Member
Carolyn Nash, Council Member
Jeff Vasquez, Council Member
ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: George Scarborough, City Manager; Richard K Denhalter, City Attorney; Cheryl Johnson,
City Clerk; Cynthia L. Pendleton, Director of Administrative Services; William M. Huber, Director of
Engineering and Building Services; Thomas Tomlinson, Director of Planning Services; Nancy Bernardi,
Recording Secretary.
It was moved by Council Member Hausdorfer, seconded by Council Member Nash, and unanimously carried that
' all Ordinances be read by title only.
PRESENTATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS
1. PRESENTATION OF COMMUNITY SERVICE AWARDS - (610.40)
Written Communication:
Report dated January 4, 1994, from Carole Jacklin, Council Services Manager, noting that the following
individuals had been selected by the Mayor to receive Community Service Awards in recognition of their
volunteer efforts toward the success of the Senior Nutrition Program: Sigismund and Elisabeth Han,
Ms. Artelle Payne, and Dr. Arthur Hurd.
Elisabeth Hau, Artelle Payne and Dr. Hurd were present to receive the Awards from Mayor Campbell.
2. RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION FOR CAROLE JACKLIN FOR 20 YEARS OF SERVICE
(730,90)
Written Communication:
Report dated January 4,1994, from Julia Kimminau, Management Assistant, noting that Carole Jacklin,
Council Services Manager, had reached 20 years of service with the City.
Council Member Hausdorfer read the Resolution of Commendation in full and presented it to
Mrs. Jacklin in recognition of her 20 years of service with the City. Mrs. Jacklin's husband, Rick Jacklin,
was presented with a Proclamation in recognition of his efforts in protecting the citizens of San Juan
Capistrano through his position as an Orange County Sheriffs Investigator with the City from January
' 1984 through August 1993.
City Council Minutes 1- 1/4/94
178
• a _ •_• t t J.1 _: • .�� r e• Ki e•1 J • EA • �• i •�
1. ADULT DAY HEALTH CARE (130.10)
Marge Madigan, 33831, Space 54, Camino Capistrano, member of the advisory council for the Adult
Day/Health Care Center, read a news release explaining that the $2,000 funded by the City would be
used to perform no -cost physical assessments for seniors at the San Juan Capistrano Nutrition site on
January 20, 1994. The funding also make possible approximately 30 home assessment visitations. She
expressed appreciation to the City for the funding.
2. SOLAG RELOCATION (810.10)
Edward Valdez, 28891 Via Leona, spoke on behalf of the Rancho San Juan, Hunters Creek,
Warmington Homes, San Juan Creek, Hidden Mountain, and Hidden Mountain Estates Homeowners
Associations regarding their opposition to the proposal being explored by the City to relocate Solag
Disposal to a site off La Pata. He questioned the use of open space land for industrial use, costs to the
City and gain to Solag, and environmental impacts to the surrounding residential area. He requested
that residents meet with City Council members individually to discuss their concerns. Council Member
Jones noted that the flyers circulated among the homeowners associations were misleading about his
involvement in the Solag relocation. He stated that as a Council Member living in the Los Rios District,
where Solag Disposal is now located, he has not been involved in this process to date and would
continue to abstain on the advice of the City Attorney since he would personally benefit from Solag's
relocation. Council Member Vasquez stated that he has not yet decided whether he would participate
in this matter because of a potential conflict of interest and noted that attorney from the FPPC advised
that he would not have a conflict of interest in this matter. Mr. Scarborough stated that many of the
residents' concerns are still being studied by City staff and have not yet been resolved. He emphasized
that the City would not proceed with this proposal unless it was in the City's financial interest and that
it was too early in the process to speculate. He indicated that the City would circulate a flyer to the
various homeowners associations advising of the status of the proposal to date.
Mike Mathison, 28862 Via Leona, inquired when this matter would be agendized and expressed concern
regarding the use of City funds to facilitate the relocation. Mr. Scarborough indicated that the proposal
was still being evaluated by staff and might not be considered by the Council if it was determined to
have no merit. If agendized, property owners within 300 feet of the project and area homeowner
associations would be notified. Council Member Hausdorfer noted that community meetings would be
held on this proposal long before any consideration by the City Council. Mr. Scarborough indicated that
he would schedule a meeting with representatives of the homeowners associations to discuss the
appropriate process for public input.
3. TRASH IMPORTATION/SOLAG RELOCATION (810.10)
Dolores Otting of Five Star Rubbish, 2130 Canyon Drive, Costa Mesa, stated opposition to the City
assisting financially in relocating Solag Disposal Company. She advised that the issue of trash
importation has not yet been settled in the County.
It was moved by Council Member Jones, seconded by Council Member Hausdorfer, that the staff
recommendations be accepted for the following items listed on the Consent Calendar. The motion carried by
the following vote:
City Council Minutes -2- 1/4/94
179
AYES: Council Members Hausdorfer, Jones, Nash, Vasquez, and Mayor Campbell
' NOES: None
ABSENT: None
1. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
a. Regular Meeting of November 16. 1993 - Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of
November 16, 1993, was continued to the meeting of January 18, 1994 at the request of Council
Member Vasquez.
b. Regular Meeting of December 7. 1993 - The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 7,
1993, were approved as submitted with Council Members Hausdorfer and Vasquez abstaining.
2. APPROVAL OF COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
a. Regular Meeting of November 16. 1993 - The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of November 16,
1993, were approved as submitted.
b. Regular Meeting of December 7. 1993 - The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 7,
1993, were approved as submitted with Council Members Hausdorfer and Vasquez abstaining.
3. RECEIVE AND FILE WARRANTS OF DECEMBER 1993 (300.30)
The List of Demands dated November 30, 1993, in the total amount of $794.14, and the List of
' Demands dated December 22, 1993, in the total amount of $1,288,397.27, were received and filed.
4. RECEIVE AND FILE CITY TREASURER'S REPORT OF INVESTMENTS AS OF
JUNE 3. 1994 (350.30)
The City Treasurer's Report of Investments as of November 30, 1993, in the total amount of
$16,442,136.63 was received and filed.
As set forth in the Report dated January 4, 1994, from the Planning Director, the following Resolution
was adopted rescinding Resolution No. 93-9-7-10 and approving a revised resolution which included
language clarifying that demolition of the Hankey/Rowse Cottage was at the option of the property
owner, as requested by the applicants' attorney:
RESOLUTION NO. 941-4-1. APPROVING DEMOLITION PERMIT OR
RELOCATION REQUEST FOR HANKEY COTTAGE LOCATED AT 28232
ORTEGA HIGHWAY AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 93-9-7-10 - A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN
CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REQUEST FOR DEMOLITION
OR RELOCATION OF THE HANKEY/ROWSE COTTAGE LOCATED AT 28232
ORTEGA HIGHWAY, AT THE OPTION OF THE PROPERTY OWNER, AND
RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 93-9-7-10
City Council Minutes -3- 1/4/94
180
6. DENIAL OF CLAIM - PROPERTY DAMAGE AND LOSS OF INCOME (NORTHEAST
SAVINGS) (170.10) —
The claim received by the City on December 1, 1993, from Northeast Savings for property damage and
loss of income, was denied, as set forth in the Report dated January 4, 1994, from the City Attorney.
7. DENIAL OF CLAIM - PROPERTY DAMAGE (OSO RANCH COMPANY) (170.10)
The claim received by the City on December 6, 1993, from Oso Ranch Company for property damage,
was denied, as set forth in the Report dated January 4, 1994, from the City Attorney.
8. SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO RAILROAD PASSENGER LOADING AND WAITING
PLATFORM. SOUTH - CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 LRA ENGINEERING
As set forth in the Report dated January 4, 1994, from the Director of Engineering and Building,
Contract Change Order No. 1 was approved in the amount of $9,600 for electrical work associated with
the installation of Metrolink ticket vending machines on the platform. The Director of Engineering and
Building was authorized to execute the document on behalf of the City.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A .98 -ACRE PARCEL INTO FOUR PARCELS LOCATED
AT 28232 ORTEGA HIGHWAY. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 92-107 (HANKEYQ(420,70)
(CONTINUED FROM DECEMBER 7. 1993)
Pr
Consideration of a request to subdivide a .98 -acre parcel into four parcels of 10,000 square feet each
for potential custom home development at the southeast corner of Ortega Highway and Via Cristal.
The hearing was continued from the meeting of December 7, 1993, to clarify proposed conditions for
demolition/relocation and noise mitigation issues.
Propgrly Owner/ADDlicants:
Lorna Ross and John Hankey
9152 Loma Street
Villa Park, CA 92667
Written Communications:
(1) Report dated January 4, 1994, from the Planning Director, recommending that the
Environmental Impact Report be certified, the processing of a Certificate of Compliance be
confirmed, and Tentative Parcel Map 92-107 be conditionally approved. The Report noted that
a meeting had been held between staff and the applicant to address issues raised at the
December 7 meeting, and a consensus was reached on the following conditions proposed by
staff:
1) to mitigate noise impacts, a 3 -foot masonry wall shall be added to the existing
wall adjacent to Ortega Highway;
2) to reduce costs to the applicant, a modified Historic American Buildings
Survey shall be required of the applicant prior to issuance of a demolition
permit or relocation of the structure; and,
3) approval of a Certificate of Compliance, as requested by the applicant.
City Council Minutes -4- 1/4/94
r
181
(2) Statement to City Council dated January 4, 1994, from Marjorie LeGaye, attorney for the
applicants, regarding the proposal by Michael and Lisa Palmer to relocate the house on site and
requesting modifications to proposed the conditions of approval.
Mechelle Lawrence, Assistant Planner/Project Manager, made an oral presentation. Mr. Tomlinson
noted that staff concurred with the language clarification to the draft Resolution suggested by the
applicant's attorney this date.
Public Hearing:
Notice having been given as required by law, Mayor Campbell opened the Public Hearing, and the
following persons responded:
(1) Marjorie Mize LeGaye, attorney for the applicants, 550 North Golden Circle Drive, Santa Ana,
spoke regarding the proposal to sell Parcel 4 to Michael and Lisa Palmer for relocation and
preservation of the Hankey House. She presented three amendments to the Resolution, which
had been discussed by telephone with City staff and concurrence reached.
There being no further input, the hearing was declared closed with the right to reopen at any time.
Adoption of Resolution Certifying the Environmental Impact Report. Confirming the
Processing of a Certificate of Compliance As an Administrative Procedure. and Conditionally
ADprovin¢ Tentative Parcel Mao 92-107:
It was moved by Council Member Hausdorfer, seconded by Council Member Nash, that the following
Resolution be adopted, with the following modifications requested by the applicant:
(1) Item 9, findings: "Subject to conditions" shall be deleted and replaced with, "Subject to the
following condition: (a) Final Map Recorded - The Final Map shall be recorded as a condition
of the Certificate of Compliance."
(2) Items 7 and 12: "East end" shall be changed to "west end."
(3) Item 13: The following shall be added: "In accordance with the requirements set forth in the
letter from Thomas Tomlinson to Marjorie LeGaye dated December 16, 1993, and the
accompanying Diann Marsh report. To ensure that the resultant cost does not exceed a total
of $3,000 ($1,600 historical consultant and $1,400 photographic documentation), staff will take
the necessary pictures (Attachment 3)."
RESOLUTION NO, 941-42. CERTIFYING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT AND APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 92-107 (HANKEY) -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN
CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT 92-1, CONFIRMING THE PROCESSING OF A CERTIFICATE OF
COMPLIANCE, AND APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 92-107, A
FOUR -LOT SUBDIVISION OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 124-28-23, A.98 -ACRE
SITE LOCATED AT 28232 ORTEGA HIGHWAY (HANKEY)
The motion carried by the following vote:
Council Members Hausdorfer, Jones, Nash, Vasquez, and Mayor Campbell
None
None
-5-
1/4/94
AYES:
NOES:
'
ABSENT:
City Council Minutes
Council Members Hausdorfer, Jones, Nash, Vasquez, and Mayor Campbell
None
None
-5-
1/4/94
182
99 . IW61=910`1Iv I`•f• <Ki]�ilu I FY.YL•I`►!<ThJI [i]`►!I•].�`►fiYLelu I:l:I:sliLtlt
• • • u• • u� t! u •
I 41tl • 1 • F t.i,. • s • s • : •
Propoid
Consideration of an appeal by the City Council of the Planning Commission action of November 9, 1993,
approving a 1,050 -square -foot playground addition for the existing McDonald's restaurant located at
31822 Del Obispo Street, subject to conditions limiting the equipment to 87 in height, and denying a
tree removal permit.
A llan :
San Juan Capistrano City Council
Procerty Owner/Applicant:
Ross Pollard
32222 Camino Capistrano
San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
Written Communication:
Report dated January 4, 1994, from the Planning Director, recommending that the Planning
Commission's approval of Architectural Control 73-1006 (Modification) and denial of the Tree Removal
Permit be upheld. The recommendation included a condition requiring that the height of the play
equipment should not exceed 87 with colors in beige and brown tones.
Exhibits were on display, and Mechelle Lawrence, Assistant Planner/Project Manager, made an oral
presentation.
Public Hearing:
Notice having been given as required by law, Mayor Campbell opened the Public Hearing, and the
following persons responded:
(1) The applicant, Ross Pollard, noted his letter to the City Council delivered December 20, 1993,
outlining areas of concern. With regard to the appearance of the project, he felt that the
proposed wall, wrought 'iron, and landscaping would screen any attention -getting factors of the
equipment. He noted that properties to the north and south of the restaurant would effectively
screen the project as well. He emphasized that he desired to maintain the aesthetic standards
of the City. With regard to the tree removal request, he stated that the trees had been planted
20 years ago without regard to site configuration, and that the tree proposed for removal, which
was closest to the flagpole, did not enhance the site. His major concern was with the Planning
Commission's condition to limit the height of the play equipment to 87". He felt that limiting
the equipment to 8 feet in height would not be worth the investment. He advised he would like
to compromise on the height of the play equipment in the 10 -foot range. He noted that the
play area could be made subterranean, but there caused concerns with drainage and safety for
children. He indicated that he did not know why the project had been appealed by the City
Council but that he would have appealed the Planning Commission's conditions to deny the tree
removal request and the height limitation. He stated he did not wish to extend the existing
building and enclose the playland and felt the minimum height should be no less than 10 feet.
(2) Tracy Reynolds, 12630 Newport Avenue, Tustin, stated she was an employee at the San Juan
Capistrano McDonald's and spoke in favor of the project as proposed by the applicant. She
indicated that 8 -foot equipment did not have sufficient play value for children. She felt that the
proposed playland would serve the needs of tourists and local families.
There being no further input, the hearing was declared closed with the right to reopen at any time.
City Council Minutes -6- 1/4/94
183
Comments by Aocellant:
' Council Member Nash stated the following reasons for her appeal of this project: 1) The playland is
primarily an attention -getting device, which would not be mitigated by the conditions imposed by the
Planning Commission; 2) the project is inappropriate for and does not meet the goals of the Design
Overlay District because it would not maintain the historic character of the City; 3) the project would
be too visible from Del Obispo Street; and 4) there was insufficient screening required to completely
reduce the attention -getting aspects of the equipment. She circulated photographs taken of play
equipment at other locations in the area. She emphasized the importance of preserving the unique
character of the City and maintaining consistency with the City's aesthetic goals. She stated these
characteristics attracted the City's current residents, who have complained that the City's former high
standards are being eroded. She felt that this exception to the City's standards should not be allowed
for the short-term benefit of one business and a few families.
The hearing was reopened to allow public input on the photographs distributed by Council Member
Nash.
The applicant, Mr. Pollard, stated his proposal was a business decision and that his restaurant was the
only McDonald's in the County with no play equipment. He noted that none of the photographs
distributed by Council Member Nash had any of the walls, wrought iron, or landscaping proposed for
his project for screening purposes and that many McDonald's restaurants successfully conceal most of
their play equipment.
The hearing was closed with the right to re -open at any time.
Council Comments/Motion to Uphold Planning Commission recommendation with Modifications
(withdrawn):
' Council Member Jones noted that he had taken his own informal poll over the last three weeks and had
received no negative comments on the project. He felt that the proposed screening would be
aesthetically pleasing. He stated he would support the applicant's original proposal for 13 -foot
equipment because the playland would benefit the children and families in the community. Council
Member Hausdorfer felt that McDonald's restaurants have no need for attention -getting devices to
attract business. He stated he supported the playland as conditioned by the Planning Commission. He
suggested that consideration be given to lowering the floor of the playland and addressing the potential
drainage issues. He felt that taller equipment could be accommodated through lowering the floor and
adequate screening.
It was moved by Council Member Hausdorfer, seconded by Council Member Jones to uphold the
Planning Commission approval of the playland equipment with the concession that additional height
would be allowed as long as the equipment did not exceed 8' 2" as measured from the exterior of the
playground boundary and staff and the applicant would have the flexibility to work together to achieve
the additional height. The motion was seconded by Council Member Jones and subsequently amended,
with the approval of the second to approve the tree removal permit. The motion was subsequently
withdrawn.
Council Member Jones cited concerns that safety issues be completely addressed if the equipment was
to be lowered. Council Member Vasquez supported the applicant's request for tree removal and 13 -
foot -high equipment because of the need in the community for play areas and to make the project
economically feasible for the applicant. Mayor Campbell stated that as long as the other trees were
preserved, particularly the larger Eucalyptus tree, she would support the request for removal of the tree
closest to the flagpole. She suggested that additional landscaping be considered to more adequately
screen the project, including trees other than Ficus because of their slow growth and root system.
' Council Member Jones suggested that Boston Ivy be considered for screening. Mayor Campbell
suggested that the hearing be continued to allow staff and the applicant to submit a mutually acceptable
proposal; Mr. Pollard concurred. Council Member Hausdorfer suggested that the project be referred
City Council Minutes -7- 1/4/94
iso
back to the Planning Commission; Council Members Vasquez and Jones felt that the Council should
handle the matter to avoid additional delay. Mr. Pollard agreed to consider Council Member Jones'
suggestion for use of Boston Ivy to cover the wall.
Continuation of Hearing:
It was moved by Council Member Jones, seconded by Council Member Vasquez, and unanimously
carried that the hearing be continued to the meeting of February 1, 1994, for review of alternative
designs and landscaping that may accommodate additional play equipment height without the equipment
being visible in the Historic District.
Council recessed at 8:48 p.m. to convene the San Juan Capistrano Community Redevelopment Agency, and
reconvened at 8:49 p.m.
1. AWARD OF BID FOR PURCHASE OF NEW TELEPHONE SYSTEM FOR CITY HALL
FACILITIES (AT&T) (370.30)
Written Communication:
Report dated January 4, 1994, from the Director of Administrative Services, recommending that the bid
to replace the existing telephone system for City Hall and the Community Services facilities be awarded
to AT&T and its Definity Communication System.
Ms. Pendleton made an oral presentation. She noted that the AT&T system would be able to hook up
with Centrex systems of outside agencies.
Award of Bid:
It was moved by Council Member Hausdorfer, seconded by Council Member Vasquez, and unanimously
carried that the bid for the purchase of a new telephone system for City Hall and Community Services
facilities be awarded to AT&T, Definity Communication System, for approximately $162,000 over a five-
year lease term. All other bids were rejected, and the City Manager, as Purchasing Officer, was
authorized to make the purchase.
i• _ • •h1M.a 4. • • • • • ' •
Written Communication:
Report dated January 4, 1994, from the Director of Engineering and Building, requesting that the item
be continued to the meeting of January 18, 1994, to allow staff to prepare several realistic alternatives
incorporating the Sports Park and the proposed expansion of the school facility, including implementa-
tion schedules.
Continuation of Item:
It was moved by Council Member Hausdorfer, seconded by Council Member Nash, and unanimously
carried that consideration of revised Sports Park Conceptual Plans, to incorporate a combined Master
City Council Minutes -8- 1/4/94
11
185
Plan for the Sports Park and the Marco Forster Middle School/Del Obispo Elementary School facility,
be continued to the meeting of January 18, 1994.
2. SAN JUAN CREEK RAILROAD BRIDGE RECONSTRUCTION - ARCHITECTURAL
TREATMENT (820.45) (CONTINUED FROM DECEMBER 7. 1993)
Written Communication:
Report dated January 4, 1994, from the Director of Engineering and Building, providing alternative
designs for the reconstruction of the San Juan Creek Bridge, as directed by the City Council on
December 7, 1993, with regard to Designs #2 (steel truss), #4 (60 -foot traditional arch), and #5 (91/2
to 10 -foot square arch), to include colored drawings or computerized renderings.
Exhibits were on display and Mr. Tomlinson reviewed the three alternatives identified as #2, trestle
design, #4, traditional arch design, and #5 roman arch design. He advised that staff preferred design
#4 because of its bridge -like appearance.
Council Comments:
Council Member Jones felt that the trestle design would appear more realistic if all of the diagonal lines
were connected and not left open in some places. Mayor Campbell expressed concern that design #2
would look like "gingerbread" painted on and would not look like traditional trestles. Mr. Tomlinson
concurred and stated that design #4 would also minimize the visual mass of the structure more
effectively.
Mr. Huber noted that total costs for the project are estimated between $15 million and $18 million, with
no costs to be incurred by the City as design and construction costs will be paid through grant funding.
He stated that the costs could increase if additional bridge support became necessary to accommodate
an architectural treatment that required more concrete.
Council Member Nash stated a preference for design #4 because of the traditional arches, compatibility
with the character of the City, and lesser visual mass. Council Member Vasquez concurred but noted
he had a problem with the vertical element and felt that the ribbed texture would add interest. Council
Member Jones noted that the original bridge was constructed about 1911 and should be considered a
significant landmark in the City. He stated that the City is usually very strict with replications of old
structures and felt that design #2 was more realistic but should be modified so that it did not appear
like a "miniaturized" trestle, perhaps with the name "Santa Fe" on it. He felt that design #4 was too far
a deviation from the original bridge. Council Member Hausdorfer stated a preference for design #4
and concurred with Council Member Vasquez' suggestion to retain the ribbed texture within the arch
elements. Mr. Tomlinson suggested that the area within the arch elements be sandblasted for texture;
Council Member Vasquez suggested the use of brick.
Mr. Scarborough indicated he would provide refinement details to the Council in their slots as they
become available, including alternatives for the texture treatment within the arches.
Approval of Design for Railroad Bridge:
It was moved by Council Member Hausdorfer, seconded by Council Member Vasquez, that Design #4,
identified as the traditional arch design, be approved as the architectural treatment for the proposed San
Juan Creek Railroad Bridge Reconstruction. The motion carried, with Council Member Jones voting
in opposition.
City Council Minutes
SO
1/4/94
186
1. ORAL REPORTS OF OUTSIDE AGENCIES
a. Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor (800.50)
Council Member Nash noted that a meeting was scheduled for this month.
b. San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor (800.50)
Mayor Campbell requested that Council Member Nash attend the meeting on Thursday,
January 6, in her place.
C. League of California Cities (140.70)
Council Member Hausdorfer noted that the first meeting of the year would be Thursday,
January 13.
1. DONATIONS TO CITY (150.10)
Mayor Campbell noted that Letters of Appreciation will be sent to the following people/businesses
acknowledging their donations to the City: David Hansch and Endevco, for their donation to the
Christmas Tree Lighting ceremony; Aardvark Towing for their donation to the Youth At -Risk Program;
Travel Guard, Inc. for their donation to the Youth At -Risk Program, Teen Program, and After -School
Recreation programs; and, the San Juan Capistrano Senior Citizen Program for their fundraiser for the
community center.
ED SESSION
Council recessed to a Closed Session at 9:17 p.m. for discussion of litigation per Government Code Section
54956.9 (Negrete v. City and related litigation), the City Clerk being excused therefrom, and reconvened at 10:15
p.m.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the Council, the meeting was adjourned at 10:15 p.m. to the Wednesday,
January 12, 1994, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber, for consideration of the San Joaquin Hills
Transportation Corridor Alignment 3 Alternatives.
Respectfully submitted,
City Council Minutes -10- 1/4/94