Loading...
17-0606_ECO-NOMICS, INC_Professional Services AgrCITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT SUSTAINABLE WASTE DIVERSION PROGRAMS This Agreement is made and entered into as of June LQ , 2017 by and between the City of San Juan Capistrano, a municipal corporation organized and operating under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 32400 Paseo Adelanto, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 ("City"), and Eco/Nomics, Inc., a Colorado Corporation its principal place of business at 24682 Del Prado, Suite 230, Dana Point, CA 92629 (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to as "Party" and collectively as "Parties" in this Agreement. RECITALS A. City is a public agency of the State of California and is in need of professional services for the following project: Sustainable Waste Diversion Programs — AB 1826 Assistance (hereinafter referred to as "the Project"). B. Consultant is duly licensed and has the necessary qualifications to provide such services. C. The Parties desire by this Agreement to establish the terms for City to retain Consultant to provide the services described herein. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Services. Consultant shall provide the City with the services described in the Scope of Services attached hereto as Exhibit "A." 2. Compensation. a. Subject -to paragraph 2(b) below, the City shall pay for such services in accordance with the Schedule of Charges set forth in Exhibit "B." b. In no event shall the total amount paid for services rendered by Consultant under this Agreement exceed the sum of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000). This amount is to cover all printing and related costs, and the City will not pay any additional fees for printing expenses. Periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of receipt of an invoice which includes a detailed description of the work performed. Payments to Consultant for work performed will be made on a monthly billing basis. 3. Additional Work. If changes in the work seem merited by Consultant or the City, and informal consultations with the other party indicate that a change is warranted, it shall be processed in 1 Eco/Nomics Inc. Agreement the following manner: a letter outlining the changes shall be forwarded to the City by Consultant with a statement of estimated changes in fee or time schedule. An amendment to this Agreement shall be prepared by the City and executed by both Parties before performance of such services, or the City will not be required to pay for the changes in the scope of work. Such amendment shall not render ineffective or invalidate unaffected portions of this Agreement. 4. Maintenance of Records. Books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to costs incurred shall be maintained by Consultant and made available at all reasonable times during the contract period and for four (4) years from the date of final payment under the contract for inspection by City. 5. Time of Performance. Consultant shall perform its services in a prompt and timely manner and shall commence performance upon receipt of written notice from the City to proceed ("Notice to Proceed"). Consultant shall complete the services required hereunder on or before June 30, 2019. The Notice to Proceed shall set forth the date of commencement of work. 6. Delays in Performance. a. Neither City nor Consultant shall be considered in default of this Agreement for delays in performance caused by circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the non- performing party. For purposes of this Agreement, such circumstances include but are not limited to, abnormal weather conditions; floods; earthquakes; fire; epidemics; war; riots and other civil disturbances; strikes, lockouts, work slowdowns, and other labor disturbances; sabotage or judicial restraint. b. Should such circumstances occur, the non-performing party shall, within a reasonable time of being prevented from performing, give written notice to the other party describing the circumstances preventing continued performance and the efforts being made to resume performance of this Agreement. 7. Compliance with Law. a. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, codes and regulations of the federal, state and local government, including Cal/OSHA requirements. b. If required, Consultant shall assist the City, as requested, in obtaining and maintaining all permits required of Consultant by federal, state and local regulatory agencies. C. If applicable, Consultant is responsible for all costs of clean up and/ or removal of hazardous and toxic substances spilled as a result of his or her services or operations performed under this Agreement. 8. Standard of Care 2 Eco/Nomics Inc. Agreement Consultant's services will be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices and principles and in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions. 9. Assignment and Subconsultant Consultant shall not assign, sublet, or transfer this Agreement or any rights under or interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the City, which may be withheld for any reason. Any attempt to so assign or so transfer without such consent shall be void and without legal effect and shall constitute grounds for termination. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall prevent Consultant from employing independent associates and subconsultants as Consultant may deem appropriate to assist in the performance of services hereunder. 10. Indgl2endent Consultant Consultant is retained as an independent contractor and is not an employee of City. No employee or agent of Consultant shall become an employee of City. The work to be performed shall be in accordance with the work described in this Agreement, subject to such directions and amendments from City as herein provided. 11. Insurance. Consultant shall not commence work for the City until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City it has secured all insurance required under this section. In addition, Consultant shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until it has secured all insurance required under this section. a. Commercial General Liability (i) The Consultant shall take out and maintain, during the performance of all work under this Agreement, in amounts not less than specified herein, Commercial General Liability Insurance, in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the City. (ii) Coverage for Commercial General Liability insurance shall be at least as broad as the following: (1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (Occurrence Form CG 00 01) or exact equivalent. (iii) Commercial General Liability Insurance must include coverage for the following: (1) Bodily Injury and Property Damage (2) Personal Injury/Advertising Injury (3) Premises/Operations Liability (4) Products/Completed Operations Liability (5) Aggregate Limits that Apply per Project (6) Explosion, Collapse and Underground (UCX) exclusion deleted (7) Contractual Liability with respect to this Contract (8) Broad Form Property Damage (9) Independent Consultants Coverage 3 Eco/Nomics Inc. Agreement (iv) The policy shall contain no endorsements or provisions limiting coverage for (1) contractual liability; (2) cross liability exclusion for claims or suits by one insured against another; (3) products/completed operations liability; or (4) contain any other exclusion contrary to the Agreement. (v) The policy shall give City, its officials, officers, employees, agents and City designated volunteers additional insured status using ISO endorsement forms CG 20 10 10 01 and 20 37 10 01, or endorsements providing the exact same coverage. NO The general liability program may utilize either deductibles or provide coverage excess of a self-insured retention, subject to written approval by the City, and provided that such deductibles shall not apply to the City as an additional insured. b. Automobile Liability (i) At all times during the performance of the work under this Agreement, the Consultant shall maintain Automobile Liability Insurance for bodily injury and property damage including coverage for owned, non -owned and hired vehicles, in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the City. (ii) Coverage for automobile liability insurance shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 00 01 covering automobile liability (Coverage Symbol 1, any auto). (iii) The policy shall give City, its officials, officers, employees, agents and City designated volunteers additional insured status. (iv) Subject to written approval by the City, the automobile liability program may utilize deductibles, provided that such deductibles shall not apply to the City as an additional insured, but not a self-insured retention. C. Workers' Compensation/Employer's Liability (i) Consultant certifies that he/she is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the, provisions of that code, and he/she will comply with such provisions before commencing work under this Agreement. (ii) To the extent Consultant has employees at any time during the term of this Agreement, at all times during the performance of the work under this Agreement, the Consultant shall maintain full compensation insurance for all persons employed directly by him/her to carry out the work contemplated under this Agreement, all in accordance with the 'Workers' Compensation and Insurance Act," Division IV of the Labor Code of the State of California and any acts amendatory thereof, and Employer's Liability Coverage in amounts indicated herein. Consultant shall require all subconsultants to obtain and maintain, for the period required by this Agreement, workers' compensation coverage of the same type and limits as specified in this section. d. Professional Liability Errors and Omissions At all times during the performance of the work under this Agreement the Consultant 4 Eco/Nomics Inc. Agreement shall maintain professional liability or Errors and Omissions insurance appropriate to its profession, in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the City and in an amount indicated herein. This insurance shall be endorsed to include contractual liability applicable to this Agreement and shall be written on a policy form coverage specifically designed to protect against acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant. "Covered Professional Services" as designated in the policy must specifically include work performed under this Agreement. The policy must "pay on behalf of" the insured and must include a provision establishing the insurer's duty to defend. e. Minimum Policy Limits Required (i) The following insurance limits are required for the Agreement: Combined Single Limit Commercial General Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence/ $2,000,000 aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage Automobile Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage Employer's Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence Professional Liability $1,000,000 per claim and aggregate (errors and omissions) Defense costs shall be payable in addition to the limits. (iii) Requirements of specific coverage or limits contained in this section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits, or other requirement, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Any available coverage shall be provided to the parties required to be named as Additional Insured pursuant to this Agreement. Evidence Required Prior to execution of the Agreement, the Consultant shall file with the City evidence of insurance from an insurer or insurers certifying to the coverage of all insurance required herein. Such evidence shall include original copies of the ISO CG 00 01 (or insurer's equivalent) signed by the insurer's representative and Certificate of Insurance (Acord Form 25- S or equivalent), together with required endorsements. All evidence of insurance shall be signed by a properly authorized officer, agent, or qualified representative of the insurer and shall certify the names of the insured, any additional insureds, where appropriate, the type and amount of the insurance, the location and operations to which the insurance applies, and the expiration date of such insurance. g. Policy Provisions Required (i) Consultant shall provide the City at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation of any policy required by this Agreement, except that the Consultant shall provide at least ten (10) days prior written notice of cancellation of any such policy due to non-payment of premium. If any of the required coverage is cancelled or expires 5 Eco/Nomics Inc. Agreement during the term of this Agreement, the Consultant shall deliver renewal certificate(s) including the General Liability Additional Insured Endorsement to the City at least ten (10) days prior to the effective date of cancellation or expiration. (ii) The Commercial General Liability Policy and Automobile Policy shall each contain a provision stating that Consultant's policy is primary insurance and that any insurance, self-insurance or other coverage maintained by the City or any named insureds shall not be called upon to contribute to any loss. (iii) The retroactive date (if any) of each policy is to be no later than the effective date of this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain such coverage continuously for a period of at least three years after the completion of the work under this Agreement. Consultant shall purchase a one (1) year extended reporting period A) if the retroactive date is advanced past the effective date of this Agreement; B) if the policy is cancelled or not renewed; or C) if the policy is replaced by another claims -made policy with a retroactive date subsequent to the effective date of this Agreement. (iv) All required insurance coverages, except for the professional liability coverage, shall contain or be endorsed to waiver of subrogation in favor of the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers or shall specifically allow Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery against City, and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its subconsultants. (v) The limits set forth herein shall apply separately to each insured against whom claims are made or suits are brought, except with respect to the limits of liability. Further the limits set forth herein shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from liability in excess of such coverage, nor shall it limit the Consultant's indemnification obligations to the City and shall not preclude the City from taking such other actions available to the City under other provisions of the Agreement or law. h. Qualifying Insurers (i) All policies required shall be issued by acceptable insurance companies, as determined by the City, which satisfy the following minimum requirements: (1) Each such policy shall be from a company or companies with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII and admitted to transact in the business of insurance in the State of California, or otherwise allowed to place insurance through surplus line brokers under applicable provisions of the California Insurance Code or any federal law. Additional Insurance Provisions (i) The foregoing requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant, and any approval of said insurance by the City, is not intended to and shall not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, including but not limited to, the provisions concerning indemnification. 6 Eco/Nomics Inc. Agreement (ii) If at any time during the life of the Agreement, any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, City has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or City will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments. In the alternative, City may cancel this Agreement. (iii) The City may require the Consultant to provide complete copies of all insurance policies in effect for the duration of the Project. (iv) Neither the City nor any of its officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers shall be personally responsible for any liability arising under or by virtue of this Agreement. j. Subconsultant Insurance Requirements. Consultant shall not allow any subcontractors or subconsultants to commence work on any subcontract until they have provided evidence satisfactory to the City that they have secured all insurance required under this section. Policies of commercial general liability insurance provided by such subcontractors or subconsultants shall be endorsed to name the City as an additional insured using ISO form CG 20 38 04 13 or an endorsement providing the exact same coverage. If requested by Consultant, City may approve different scopes or minimum limits of insurance for particular subcontractors or subconsultants. 12. Indemnification. a. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend (with counsel reasonably approved by the City), indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, suits, actions, proceedings, costs, expenses, liability, judgments, awards, decrees, settlements, loss, damage or injury of any kind, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, (collectively, "Claims') in any manner arising out of, pertaining to, or incident to any alleged acts, errors or omissions, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants or agents in connection with the performance of the Consultant's services, the Project or this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of all consequential damages, expert witness fees and attorneys' fees and other related costs and expenses. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Consultant's services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to Claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant. Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers . b. Additional Indemnity Obligations. Consultant shall defend, with counsel of City's choosing and at Consultant's own cost, expense and risk, any and all Claims covered by this section that may be brought or instituted against the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers. Consultant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers as part of any such claim, suit, action or other proceeding. Consultant shall also reimburse City for the cost of any settlement paid by the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers as part of any such claim, suit, action or other proceeding. Such reimbursement shall include payment for the City's attorney's fees and costs, including expert 7 Eco/Nomics Inc. Agreement witness fees. Consultant shall reimburse the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers. 13. California Labor Code Requirements. a. Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq. and 1770 et seq., which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on certain "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws, if applicable. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claims, liabilities, costs, penalties or interest arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. It shall be mandatory upon the Consultant and all subconsultants to comply with all California Labor Code provisions, which include but are not limited to prevailing wages, employment of apprentices, hours of labor and debarment of contractors and subcontractors. b. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, then pursuant to Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, the Consultant and all subconsultants performing such Services must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations. Consultant shall maintain registration for the duration of the Project and require the same of any subconsultants, as applicable. This Project may also be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. It shall be Consultant's sole responsibility to comply with all applicable registration and labor compliance requirements. 14. Verification of Employment Ellgibility. By executing this Agreement, Consultant verifies that it fully complies with all requirements and restrictions of state and federal law respecting the employment of undocumented aliens, including, but not limited to, the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, as may be amended from time to time, and shall require all subconsultants and sub- subconsultants to comply with the same. 15. Laws and Venue. This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. If any action is brought to interpret or enforce any term of this Agreement, the action shall be brought in a state or federal court situated in the County of Orange, State of California. 16. Termination or Abandonment a. City has the right to terminate or abandon any portion or all of the work under this Agreement by giving ten (10) calendar days written notice to Consultant. In such event, City shall be immediately given title and possession to all original field notes, drawings and specifications, written reports and other documents produced or developed for that portion of the work completed and/or being abandoned. City shall pay Consultant the reasonable value Eco/Nomics Inc. Agreement of services rendered for any portion of the work completed prior to termination. If said termination occurs prior to completion of any task for the Project for which a payment request has not been received, the charge for services performed during such task shall be the reasonable value of such services, based on an amount mutually agreed to by City and Consultant of the portion of such task completed but not paid prior to said termination. City shall not be liable for any costs other than the charges or portions thereof which are specified herein. Consultant shall not be entitled to payment for unperformed services, and shall not be entitled to damages or compensation for termination of work. b. Consultant may terminate its obligation to provide further services under this Agreement upon thirty (30) calendar days' written notice to City only in the event of substantial failure by City to perform in accordance with the terms of this Agreement through no fault of Consultant. 17. Documents. Except as otherwise provided in "Termination or Abandonment," above, all original field notes, written reports, Drawings and Specifications and other documents, produced or developed for the Project shall, upon payment in full for the services described in this Agreement, be furnished to and become the property of the City. 18. Organization Consultant shall assign Trevor Blythe as Project Manager. The Project Manager shall not be removed from the Project or reassigned without the prior written consent of the City. above. 19. Limitation of A-greement. This Agreement is limited to and includes only the work included in the Project described 20. Notice Any notice or instrument required to be given or delivered by this Agreement may be given or delivered by depositing the same in any United States Post Office, certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed to: CITY: City of San Juan Capistrano 32400 Paseo Adelanto San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Attn: Noreen Swiontek and shall be effective upon receipt thereof. 21. Third Party Rights CONSULTANT: Eco/Nomics, Inc. 24682 Del Prado, Suite 230 Dana Point, CA 92629 Attn: Trevor Blythe Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights or benefits to anyone other than the City and the Consultant. 9 Eco/Nomics Inc. Agreement 22. Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and that it shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, age or other interests protected by the State or Federal Constitutions. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. 23. Entire Agreement This Agreement, with its exhibits, represents the entire understanding of City and Consultant as to those matters contained herein, and supersedes and cancels any prior or contemporaneous oral or written understanding, promises or representations with respect to those matters covered hereunder. Each party acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements have been made by any person which are not incorporated herein, and that any other agreements shall be void. This Agreement may not be modified or altered except in writing signed by both Parties hereto. This is an integrated Agreement. 24. Severability The unenforceability, invalidity or illegality of any provision(s) of this Agreement shall not render the provisions unenforceable, invalid or illegal. 25. Successors and Assigns This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the successors in interest, executors, administrators and assigns of each party to this Agreement. However, Consultant shall not assign or transfer by operation of law or otherwise any or all of its rights, burdens, duties or obligations without the prior written consent of City. Any attempted assignment without such consent shall be invalid and void. 26. Non -Waiver None of the provisions of this Agreement shall be considered waived by either party, unless such waiver is specifically specified in writing. 27. Time of Essence Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement. 28. Cfty's Right to Employ Other Consultants City reserves its right to employ other consultants, including engineers, in connection with this Project or other projects. 29. Prohibited Interests 10 Ec©,'Nop;ics Inc. € gg ecfneM Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no director, official, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom. 30. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed by the Parties in counterparts, which counterparts shall be construed together and have the same effect as if all the Parties had executed the same instrument. Counterpart signatures may be transmitted by facsimile, email, or other electronic means and have the same force and effect as if they were original signatures. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] 11 Eco/Nomics Inc. Agreement SIGNATURE PAGE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO AND ECONOMICS, INC. FOR SUSTAINABLE WASTE DIVERSION PROGRAMS IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO ECO/NOMICS, INC. By: Benjamin Siegel By: Title: City Manager Signature: Attest: By: Maria Morris Title: 7C'1 rk tn+ P j) Signature: APPROVED AS TO FORM: BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP By: Signature. �-� 12 &o/Nomics Inc Agreement Title: �r,�,�► Signature: EXHIBIT A Scope of Services AB 1826 IMPLEMENTATION ASSISTANCE 3. Scope of Work Deliverables Task L• Generator Identification Deliverables: Refined list of non-compliant Tier 1 and 2 generators based on OC Health Care Agency listing and analysis of CR&R commercial listing. Task 2: Generator Notification and Technical Assistance Deliverables: Develop a mail -merge to direct mail non-compliant generators; track interactions with generators using red/green list; follow-up in- person with non-compliant generators to implement 10— 25 cost-effective and AB 1826 compliant organics diversion programs; deliver employee training. Task 3: Program Monitoring Deliverables; Compile recurring reports to the City/CalRecycle on the AB 1826 compliance level for the City; monitor program status and retrain employees at participating restaurants as needed; etc. Task 4: Food donationlrescue Deliverables: Facilitate food rescue programs at food service locations; development of a local network of food pantries; coordinate with Waste Not OC and Food Finders to expand service offerings within the City; and development of food rescue outreach materials. 13 Eco/Nomics Inc. Agreement EXHIBIT B Schedule of Charges/Payments Consultant will invoice City on a monthly cycle. Consultant will include with each invoice a detailed progress report that indicates the amount of budget spent on each task. Consultant will inform City regarding any out -of -scope work being performed by Consultant. This is a time -and - materials contract. 7&8. Schedule of Estimates Hours, Rates, and Cost by Task The table below shows the estimated budget to identify and notify all non-compliant AB 1826 generators and implement new organics diversion programs at between 10 to 25 food service establishments. The meetings with the City, conference calls, and progress reporting are included In the hours shown in the table. Program Program Program Vice Implementation Implementation Implementation Total President President Manager Coordinator Assistant O'Toole Blythe Gouiart Bovan Lau $205.00 $13S.00 ` $90.00 $80.00 $40.00 Hours Budget Task 1: Generator 2.00 6.00 12.00 6 00 12 00 38.00 $3,260.00 Identlficatlon Task 2: 9 Generator Notificition and 6.00 20.00 4000 4000 1500 121.00 $11,330.00 Technical Assistance Task 3: Program 2.00 8.110 1000 1000 80.00 110.00 $6,390.00 Monitoring Tusk 4: food donation/rescuo 2 00 8.00 12 DQ 1200 1200 46.00 $4,010.00 deliverables q {} TOTAL PROTECT 12.00 42.00 74.00 68.00 I 119.00 _1._ 269 HOURS TOTAL NOT TO EXCEED (Cost $2,460,00 $5,670.00 $6,660.00 $5,440.00 $4,760.00 $24,990.00 per Person & Grand Total) NOTE. The rates shown in the table above are all-inclusive and include computer time, printing, travel time and expenses to and from client meetings, field expenses, telephone, postage, and all other Internal overhead costs. EcoNomlcs does not charge its clients differential rates for overtime or non-standard work shifts. 14 Eco/Nomics Inc. Agreement Sustainable Waste Diversion Proposal Project Concept 2: A8 1826 Implementation Assistance YS iMORPORR11D �� iSiRS11SRE0 � v Submitted by EcoNomics, Inc. April 21, 2017 24682 Del Prado, Suite 230 Dana Point, California 92629 CI Table of Contents 1. Project Overview............................................................................................................................. 3 2. Methods and Approach................................................................................................................... 3 KeyMilestones...............................................................................................................................................4 Interactionswith the City................................................................................................................................4 ExpectedProject Tasks...................................................................................................................................5 Task 1: Generator Identification......................................................... _........... ........ ......... ., .—....., ..5 Task 2: Generator Notification and Technical Assistance ............ ....... —... ,......... ,............................................ ..,7 Task3: Program Monitoring .................................... _._....... .......... ................................................................... 8 Task4: Food donation/rescue............................................................................................................................8 3. Scope of Work Deliverables............................................................................................................. 9 4. Qualifications and Experience.......................................................................................................... 9 4.1. Number of years in business..........,.......................................................................................................... 9 4.2. Names, location, and reference information for three similar projects .................................................... 9 4.2.1. Example 1 of Similar Project — Anaheim ............................................ .......... ..... _.............................. ,..,...9 4.2.2. Example 2 of Similar Project — Mission Viejo............................................................................__.,_......10 4.2.3. Example 3 of Similar Project —Tustin ........................................................... .10 5. Samples of work products for similar projects............................................................................... 11 5.1. Anaheim Work Product Example...........................................................................................................11 5.2. Mission Viejo Work Product Example..................,................................,................,....................,..........11 5.3. Tustin Work Product Example...............................................................................................................,.11 6. List of Project Personnel................................................................................................................ 11 6.1. Primary Contact...................................................................................................................................... 11 6.2. Supervisory Personnel........................................................................................................................... 11 6.3. Resumes and References for Project Team............................................................................................ 11 7&8. Schedule of Estimates Hours, Rates, and Cost by Task............................................................... 12 9. Supplemental Materials................................................................................................................. 13 1. Project Overview It is our goal to assist the City in implementing AB 1826 organics diversion programs at a portion of the non-compliant food service establishments in the City. The overarching goals of this project will be to ensure that 1) the City is in compliance with AB 1826; 2) that the City is cost-effectively moving closer to its Zero Waste goal by increasing participation in existing organics diversion programs; and 3) that the programs are implemented in a cost-effective manner for the generators (restaurants). Upon engagement, it is our intent to conduct an analysis of the City's legislative compliance status vis-a- vis AB 1826. To this end, EcoNomics will review the current franchise agreement scope of work, account listings, CalRecycle Electronic Annual Reports, and monthly diversion tonnage reports to analyze existing diversion program implementation levels. The objective of this process is twofold: 1) to compare current diversion program implementation levels to state -mandated diversion requirements, and 2) to make recommendations for additional programs or program expansions needed to comply with AB 1826. The review process would also include an initial kick-off meeting with City staff to discuss the City's organics programs and to review of compliance status with CalRecycle. We our confident that our proposed project will significantly increase both recycling and waste reduction and will also benefit the community and environment. For example, by implementing organics diversion programs at 100% of the approximately 42 non-compliant Tier 1 and Tier 2 generators (i.e. food service establishments that generate four or more cubic yards of organics per week), we expect the City would realize an annual organics diversion tonnage of over 1,300 tons. It is our understanding that the food scrap materials would be hauled to Waste Management's CORe facility by CR&R, where they would be converted into energy and soil amendment at a waste water treatment facility through the process of anaerobic digestion. Using CalRecycle's emission reduction factors for organic waste diversion, diverting 1,300 tons of organic materials from the landfill will eliminate the equivalent of over 800 metric tons of carbon dioxide, or about the same air quality impact of taking 134 cars off of the road for a year. Further, a critical component of implementing organics diversion programs is identifying and diverting edible food from the landfill and into the local food pantry system. If selected, we will work to expand food rescue programs that will benefit the community. 2. Methods and Approach Recommended Approach: With the passage of new legislation containing aggressive diversion mandates and the increase in statewide disposal tonnages since 2012, CalRecycle has recently enhanced its enforcement of diversion mandates. To this end, CalRecycle's director, Scott Smithline, indicated in a January 10, 2017 letter to all jurisdictions in California that compliance action will no longer be limited to the 4 -year review cycles and that going forward the department will enact an 'any -time compliance review' policy. (The entire January 10, 2017 letter from CalRecycle is included as Exhibit 1 in Section 9 of this proposal): "CalRecycle will initiate a review and may refer a jurisdiction to enforcement at any time that CalRecycle receives information that a jurisdiction has not implemented, or is not making a good faith effort to implement, its required programs." With CalRecycle's focus on the programmatic elements of AB 1826, the City will need to ensure that it is implementing the requirements of both laws in good faith in order to avoid compliance action during the 2017 review cycle. Immediate notification by the City to all AB 1826 non-compliant generators will be a critical first step to demonstrate to CalReycle that the City is making a good faith effort. Providing direct technical assistance to these accounts will also demonstrate forward progress to CalRecycle. Additional information regarding our recommended approach to implementing AB 1826 diversion programs can be found in the task descriptions included in this section. These recent developments in state compliance enforcement policies, coupled with the recent inclusion of Tier 2 generators in January 2017, have made AB 1826 notification and implementation tasks a high priority. Key Milestones Key milestones associated with the project include the following metrics. 1. 100% AB 1826 compliance rate: EcoNomics will review current food scrap recycling program implementation levels to determine the current rate of AB 1826 compliance. We will work with the City and CR&R to develop a pathway to, and a timeline for, 100% AB 1826 compliance. 2. 50% Organics Diversion Rate by 2020 and 75% by 2025: SB 1383 set a statewide goal of diverting 50% of organics from the landfill by 2020 and 75% by 2025. EcoNomics will coordinate with the City to develop to identify baseline organics disposal tonnages and develop a pathway to divert these materials as the state continues to promulgate regulations as they pertain to SB 1383. 3. 20% of Edible Food Landfilled Recovered by 2025: SB 1383 also set forth a requirement that 20% of the edible food being disposed in 2014 be recovered for food rescue. EcoNomics will work with the City to quantify the edible food being disposed as the state continues to define this provision of SB 1383. Interactions with the City We anticipate recurring meetings with the City will be the primary means of receiving project direction. The meetings will also be used to communicate project results, milestones, and note any barriers encountered. Initially, a series of meetings will be held to kick-off the project, present the results of our baseline compliance and implementation analysis, and to confirm task prioritization. As the project goes forward, the team will access the need for either bimonthly or quarterly meetings. Commercial and food establishment diversion program implementation tracking will also be coordinated with the City. EcoNomics has developed a reporting tool for implementation and tracking overall project attainment. We have included a link to this tool as Exhibit 2 in Section 9: Supplemental Information. Contained within Exhibit 2 is an example of a 'Red/green' list for the City of Rancho Mirage. A similar format would be created for San Juan Capistrano that shows: a list of non-compliant food service accounts in the city, the specific service levels for these accounts, and a narrative summary of recent interactions that the hauler, the City, or the consultant has had with the account vis-a-vis implementing waste diversion programs. This document serves as the basis for the preparation of recurring updates that the hauler submits to City staff. This database is housed in a cloud -based server, which allows different parties (City, hauler, consultant, or other third parties as needed) to update it in real-time with any work done with new accounts to implement diversion programs. On the exhibit, the red -colored accounts have refused organics recycling service and the ereen-colored accounts have recvcline oroerams in place. EcoNomics will emolov this 40 10 tool to clearly communicate implementation progress to the City, account by account. This report data can be aggregated, queried, and manipulated, as needed, to generate specific activity reports on a periodic basis (i.e. annually, quarterly, monthly). EcoNomics can also use its account tracking database to report data to CalRecycle vis-a-vis the annual AB 341 and AB 1826 outreach and monitoring requirements. Expected Project Tasks Task 1: Generator Identification As noted earlier, if selected, EcoNomics will conduct a baseline compliance analysis to determine the degree to which the City's businesses have implemented AB 1826 compliant programs. The first step in this process is to identify the generators that are required to implement organics programs. EcoNomics has developed a system that uses the Orange County Health Care Agency's food service permit database. In 2015, CalRecycle published EcoNomics' methodology on its website as an approved system to identify organic volume generation levels in Orange County. A link to EcoNomics' CalRecycle- approved generator identification methodology is included as Exhibit 3 in Section 9: Supplemental Information. EcoNomics has jump-started this task by using its CalRecycle-approved generator identification methodology to identify Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3 accounts in the City that have a high probability of generating over four yards or more of organics per week (Tiers 1 and 2) and four yards or more of MSW per week (Tier 3). These accounts would be targeted for the first round of AB 1826 outreach and implementation. The table shows the food service establishments that are expected to generate eight cubic yards of organics per week as highlighted in green (8 establishments), establishments that generate 4 or more cubic yards of organics per week as highlighted in orange (41 establishments), and the 92 Tier 3 restaurants that have 4 or more yards of MSW on service per week and generate some food waste materials (blue). Based on our analysis, 3 of the 8 Tier 1 generators that are not in compliance and 39 of the 41 Tier 2 generators that are not in compliance. Our preliminary compliance analysis uses data from the Food Recycling Hall of Fame section of CR&R's Winter 2016 Environmental News bill insert that indicates the following restaurants have organics collection service: EI Adobe (Tier 1), EI Campeon (Tier 2), Ruby's Diner (Tier 1), Sundried Tomato (Tier 2), St Margaret's School (Tier 2). Based on work in other cities, we are confident that the following Tier 1 supermarkets have internal organics diversion programs that meet the requirements of AB 1826: Vons, Ralph's, and Costco. Upon engagement, we will analyze CR&R's commercial account listing to confirm our AB 1826 compliance assumptions. Table 5.1. Preliminary AB 1826 Analysis for City of Son Juan Capistrano Using EcoNomics' CalRecycle-approved Generator Identification Methodology Tier 1 Food Service Establishments that Generate 8+ CY/WK of Organics In Newport Beach RESTAURANT 201+ PERSONS - COMPLEX 6 SUPERMARKET/BAKERY 30000+ SQ FT 1 SUPERMARKET/BAKERY 30000+ SQ FT - COMPLEX 1 TOTAL FOOD SERVICE ESTABLISHMENTS WITH 8+CY/WK ORGANICS 8 Tier 2 Food Service Establishments that Generate 4+ CY/WK of Organics In Newport Beach HOSPITAL OR PATIENT CARE KITCHEN 61-100 BEDS _ _ 1 PRIVATE SCHOOL - UNPACKAGED 1 PRIVATE SCHOOL - UNPACKAGED - COMPLEX 2 RESTAURANT 101-150 PERSONS 1 RESTAURANT 101-150 PERSONS - COMPLEX 10 RESTAURANT 151-200 PERSONS 2 RESTAURANT 151-200 PERSONS - COMPLEX 6 RESTAURANT 61-100 PERSONS 3 RESTAURANT 61-100 PERSONS - COMPLEX 14 SENIOR FEEDING NUTRITION SITE 1 TOTAL FOOD SERVICE ESTABLISHMENTS WITH 4+CY/WK ORGANICS 1 41 Tier 3 Food Service Establishments that Generate 4+ CY/WK of Organics In Newport Beach DEPENDENT FOOD OPERATION WHOLESALE 1 MEAT MARKET UNDER 2000 SQ FT 3 PACKAGED WAREHOUSE UNDER 2000 SQ FT 2 PRIVATE SCHOOL - PREPACKAGED _ - -- PROCESSING PLANT (UNPKG) 2000-5999 SQ FT 1 PROCESSING PLANT (UNPKG) UNDER 2000 SQ FT 1 RESTAURANT 31-60 PERSONS RESTAURANT 31-60 PERSONS - COMPLEX 266 RESTAURANT UNDER 31 PERSONS 23 RESTAURANT UNDER 31 PERSONS - COMPLEX 7 RETAIL BAKERY 2000+ SQ FT - COMPLEX 1 SUPERMARKET 2000-5999 SQ FT 6 SUPERMARKET 2000-5999 SQ FT - COMPLEX 1 SUPERMARKET UNDER 2000 SQ FT _ _ 2 SUPERMARKET/BAKERY 6000-29999 SQ FT 1 SUPERMARKET/BAKERY 6000-29999 SQ FT - COMPLEX 1 SUPERMARKET/BAKERY UNDER 6000 SQ FT _ _ 1 TAVERN UNDER 60 PERSONS 4 WHOLESALE BAKERY UNDER 2000 SQ FT 1 TOTAL FOOD SERVICE ESTABLISHMENTS WITH 4+CY/WK MSW 92 10 00 09 Task 2: Generator Notification and Technical Assistance 00 Providing technical assistance to generators is critical to implementing AB 1826 programs. Traditionally, of haulers lack the in-house expertise to effectively provide technical assistance and oftentimes fall short of of compliance requirements. Further, the cost of providing organics recycling service to generators at „t, discounted rates creates 'disincentives' for haulers to provide diversion service lines. We recommend SIR that the City direct its implementation/outreach efforts through staff or its consultant. EcoNomics recommends sending a notification letter directly to the service and billing addresses of ALL of the restaurants identified to be Tier 1 and Tier 2. The letter should inform the business of the law, its compliance options, and that the City can provide technical assistance to make the implementation process seamless. A link to an AB 1826 letter used in another client city is included as Exhibit 4 in Section 9. Included in this letters is a self -reporting form that allows generators to provide information about internal organics diversion programs. After the City provides businesses with written notifications of their compliance obligations, the top priority generators will be contacted. The first contact is by phone, which is then followed by an in person visit by EcoNomics staff to begin the program's implementation Technical assistance will be prioritized to 1) generators that request this service as a result of receiving the notification letter from the City and 2) generators that have been identified as 'high priority' due to size and/or amount of food scraps generated. Some of the restaurants listed in the table above, as well as some of the AB 341 non-compliant businesses, will be easier to implement than others. There are several factors that make waste diversion program implementation less labor-intensive at some generators including: 1) the business has made a public corporate commitment to sustainability; 2) there is an established working relationship with the businesses and EcoNomics (we have identified some restaurants on the Tiers 1-3 lists that we have worked with in other cities to implement an organics program). Since there are limited consultant resources to work with all 42 non-compliant accounts, it is necessary to prioritize consulting efforts to focus on generators with a high likelihood of implementing a waste diversion program. EcoNomics will closely coordinate with the City as part of its initial work plan development to determine the optimal number of generators that would benefit most from direct technical assistance. 11D The technical assistance and implementation process is very labor-intensive. The number of hours to fully establish a working organics program at one generator is significant (between 10 and 25 hours). Based on the annual budget of $25,000 set forth by the City, it is anticipated that we can implement between 10 to 25 new organics programs per year. At this pace of implementation, the City's overall AB e 1826 compliance rate will increase from 14% to 35-65% within the first year of the project. In the following year, if the program pace were sustained, the City's Tier 1 and Tier 2 compliance rate would approach 100%. For each account that receives technical assistance, EcoNomics typically conducts a site audit to gather key field data that will be used to implement a diversion program. For reference, an example of the site assessment form used is included as Exhibit 5 in Section 9. The audits are done by either visual estimate and/or by using statistically validated bin sorts at sites if program outcomes are not corresponding to expected projections. Exhibit 6 is submitted as a sample document that will be prepared for each business that is being targeted for implementation. Often these plans are phased in so that a business can "try out" a pilot before committing to the fully expanded diversion program. rf Task 3: Program Monitoring The importance, and need, for program maintenance cannot be overstressed, especially for restaurants and multi -family properties. The restaurant industry has a high labor turnover, language challenges, a hectic work pace, usually thin profit margins, and its management style tends to be very pragmatic. Signage disappears, training continuity may have lapsed, and chefs and immediate floor management can also have a change in personnel. Any outreach efforts, no matter how diligent or thorough, generally have a half-life of six -months. A monthly site visit keeps programs functioning. There are two required components to monitor a new food scrap program: 1) to keep food scrap contamination levels low (which is the restaurant's responsibility) and 2) to track the tonnage collected (which is the hauler's responsibility). The most common cause of program cancellation is contamination of the food scraps is too high. The most serious contaminant is glass. Neither compost nor anaerobic digestions facilities can tolerate even the smallest amount of glass in the food scraps. Given the usual bar compliment to restaurants and resorts, this is the most challenging aspect of food scrap programs. Another monitoring component is necessary to make sure that the service levels and numbers of containers are matched to the rate of food scrap generation. The hauler may be losing revenue due to reduced amounts of MSW collection. The hauler trying to maintain a higher revenue stream to offset program revenue losses will be inclined to over -service the account. However, the restaurant needs the incentive of the lower waste bill to enroll in the program. This dynamic results in a need for "bridging" of differing side's objectives. Task 4: Food donation/rescue Food rescue is not only an important component of compliance with both AB 1826 and SB 1383, but it also has tremendous community benefits. A surprising amount of families in South Orange County are food insecure. By coordinating with local food pantries to recover wasted food and to feed hungry families, the City can demonstrate compliance with state diversion mandates and serve the less fortunate within the community. We make a point of incorporating food rescue into our AB 1826 compliance conversations with food service establishments. Indeed, there is a compelling business case for recovering edible food for restaurant owners: businesses can reduce disposal costs and receive tax deductions on the value of donated food. We have worked with local food pantries in Mission Viejo, Tustin, Anaheim, and Laguna Hills to arrange for collection of edible food waste as a compliment to AB 1826 diversion programs. Food Finders is a local agency that has partnered with Waste Not OC to coordinate the logistical component of food rescue primarily in north and central Orange County. However, based on conversations with the management at Food Finders, the agency is trying to expand its operations to South County. There may be an opportunity to harmonize the City's AB 1826 outreach efforts with Food Finders south county expansion push. In other cities, we have included a one-page information sheet about food rescue in AB 1826 notification letters to restaurants. Exhibit 7 contains an example of an food rescue information sheet that was distributed in Laguna Hills. SB 1383 will require a 20% recovery rate for edible food that was disposed of in 2014. Currently, CalRecycle is in the process of defining and quantifying edible food waste and developing the regulations that will be used to implement the law. The final regulations are expected to be released in early 2018. 1b pe 3. Scope of Work Deliverables Task 1: Generator Identification Deliverables: Refined list of non-compliant Tier 1 and 2 generators based on OC Health Care Agency listing and analysis of CR&R commercial listing. Task 2: Generator_ Notification and Technical Assistance Deliverables: Develop a mail -merge to direct mail non-compliant generators; track interactions with generators using red/green list; follow-up in- person with non-compliant generators to implement 10 — 25 cost-effective and AB 1826 compliant organics diversion programs; deliver employee training. Task 3: Program Monitoring Deliverables: Compile recurring reports to the City/CalRecycle on the AB 1826 compliance level for the City; monitor program status and retrain employees at participating restaurants as needed; etc. Task 4: Food donation/rescue Deliverables: Facilitate food rescue programs at food service locations; development of a local network of food pantries; coordinate with Waste Not OC and Food Finders to expand service offerings within the City; and development of food rescue outreach materials. 4. Qualifications and Experience 4.1. Number of years in business. Since 1977, EcoNomics, Inc. has assisted municipal clients to create solid waste and recycling systems that are efficient, cost effective and in compliance with all federal and state laws and regulations. EcoNomics has also assisted public and private sector businesses with strategic planning and implementation services for recycling, source reduction, organic waste management, buy -recycled, manufacture -for recyclability and the development of sustainability profiles. 4.2. Names, location, and reference information for three similar projects. 4.2.1. Example 1 of Similar Project — Anaheim Client Organization: City of Anaheim Project Type: AB 1826 Compliance — Organics Program Design and Implementation, Data -based Rate Negotiation and Development Date of Service: January 2016 — present Contact Name and Title: Ayumi Takayasu, Streets and Sanitation Manager Telephone: 714.765.6801 Email: ATakayasu@anaheim.net Description of Service Provided: EcoNomics assisted the City of Anaheim in identifying Tier 1 generators per AB 1826 and notifying them of the requirement to divert organics. Concurrently, at the City's direction, EcoNomics worked with the City's franchise hauler in collecting and analyzing data from a pilot program to evaluate a rate for a full-scale commercial food scrap recycling program. EcoNomics directly implemented over forty (40) Anaheim Tier 1 restaurants, including Angel's Stadium, the Garden Walk, and the Packing House. These food scrap programs were implemented in June 1, 2016. As a critical part of implementing the program, EcoNomics emphasized staff training of all restaurant employees. To this end, EcoNomics worked closely with program participants to provide interactive and bilingual training sessions for multiple shifts of kitchen staff and servers before food scrap collection service initiated. The emphasis on training was effective, and the pilot program continues to divert over 60 tons of food scrap materials per month from 44 restaurants with minimal contamination during its current nine-month operational track record. The pilot phase of the program concluded on November 30, 2016. During the 6 month duration of the pilot, EcoNomics used productivity data collected from the pilot program to: 1) develop a food scrap rate that provides program participants with an incentive to enroll in the program and; (2) to ensure that the hauler is adequately compensated for services rendered. 4.2.2. Example 2 of Similar Project — Mission Viejo Client Organization: City of Mission Viejo Project Type: AB 1826 Compliance — Organics Program Design and Implementation, Commercial and Multi -family Recycling Outreach and Implementation Date of Service: 2006 — present Contact Name and Title: Denise Matson, Environmental Program Manager Telephone: 949.470.3010 Email: DMatson@cityofmissionviejo.org Mission Viejo has been a client of EcoNomics since 2006. During this time, EcoNomics has assisted the City demonstrate compliance with AB 939, AB 341, and AB 1826 by implementing cost-effective waste diversion programs within the business community. EcoNomics also assisted Mission Viejo in the implementation of a pilot -scale organics program. The program currently diverts over 80 tons per month of food scraps. EcoNomics worked directly with over 60 restaurants within the City to implement and expand its cost-effective food scrap recycling programs since 2014. As with Anaheim, EcoNomics used the data it has gathered from implementing these programs at food service sites to develop a rate that provides a cost -incentive to restaurants to enroll in the program but also compensates the hauler for the services it provides. 4.2.3. Example 3 of Similar Project — Tustin Client Organization: City of Tustin Project Type: AB 1826 Compliance — Organics Program Design and Implementation, Commercial and Multi -family Recycling Outreach and Implementation Date of Service: 2015 — present Contact Name and Title: Stacey Cuevas, Public Works Manager Telephone: 714.573.3037 Email: scuevas@tustinca.org EcoNomics has assisted the City of Tustin with AB 1826 generator identification, notification, and implementation for both Tier 1 and Tier 2 generators. EcoNomics oversaw the development and delivery of notification letters to over 100 food service establishments. After the letters were distributed, EcoNomics divided the City into 4 different zones to coordinate in-person follow-up visits between 3 EcoNomics staff and the contract hauler, CR&R's, Sustainability Coordinator. As a result of these efforts, over 40 new accounts have subscribed to the City's organics diversion program, which has resulted in a five -fold increase in monthly organics diversion tonnage to over 100 tons per month. C e 5. Samples of work products for similar projects 5.1. Anaheim Work Product Example As an example of the work product for the City of Anaheim, we have included a PowerPoint presentation that EcoNomics' Vice President delivered at the Southern California Waste Management Forum in November 2016. The PowerPoint provides an overview of the project and the compliance approach taken. Please follow the link below to view the PowerPoint: http://bit.ly/AnaheimSCWM FPrezo 5.2. Mission Viejo Work Product Example Please following the link below for an example of a cost-saving organics recycling proposal that EcoNomics developed for a large generator in the City of Mission Viejo: http://bit.ly/Proposal_Example 5.3. Tustin Work Product Example Please following the link below to view a chart showing the organics diversion tonnage and programmatic trends for the City of Tustin that resulted from EcoNomics' field efforts: http://bit.ly/TustinOrganicsTons 6. List of Project Personnel 6.1. Primary Contact Trevor Blythe will be the primary contact for this project. 6.2. Supervisory Personnel William O'Toole and Trevor Blythe will be the supervisory team for this project. 6.3. Resumes and References for Project Team In an effort to reduce paper usage, please see our Project Concept 1 submittal for resumes of key project team members. 7&8. Schedule of Estimates Hours, Rates, and Cost by Task The table below shows the estimated budget to identify and notify all non-compliant AB 1826 generators and implement new organics diversion programs at between 10 to 25 food service establishments. The meetings with the City, conference calls, and progress reporting are included in the hours shown in the table. NOTE: The rates shown in the table above are all-inclusive and include computer time, printing, travel time and expenses to and from client meetings, field expenses, telephone, postage, and all other internal overhead costs. EcoNomics does not charge its clients differential rates for overtime or non-standard work shifts. Program Program Program Vice implementation Implementation Implementation Total President President Manager Coordinator Assistant c Blythe O'Toole Goulart Bevan Lau Hours Budget $205.00 $135.00 $90.00 $80.00 $40.00 Task 1: Generator 2.00 6.00 12.00 6.00 12.00 38.00 $3,260.00 Identification Task 2: Generator Notification and 6.00 20.00 40.00 40.00 15.00 121.00 $11,330.00 Technical Assistance Task 3: Program 2.00 8.00 10.00 10.00 80.00 110.00 $6,390.00 Monitoring Task 4: Food donation/rescue 2.00 8.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 46.00 $4,010.00 Dellverables TOTAL PROJECT 12.00 42.00 74.00 68.00 119.00 269 HOURS TOTAL NOT TO EXCEED (Cost $2,460.00 $5,670.00 $6,660.00 $5,440.00 $4,760.00 $24,990.00 per Person & Grand Total) NOTE: The rates shown in the table above are all-inclusive and include computer time, printing, travel time and expenses to and from client meetings, field expenses, telephone, postage, and all other internal overhead costs. EcoNomics does not charge its clients differential rates for overtime or non-standard work shifts. 9. Supplemental Materials The following exhibits were mentioned throughout the body of the proposal and are examples of supplemental materials. 1. Exhibit 1: CalRecycle any time review letter a. http://bit.ly/CalRecycle_Letter 2. Exhibit 2: Red/Green list a. http://bit.ly/RedGreenList 3. Exhibit 3: CalRecycle approved methodology a. http://bit.ly/EcoCaIRecycleMethodology 4. Exhibit 4: AB 1826 Letter and Self Reporting Form a. http://bit.ly/AB1826_Letter_Example 5. Exhibit 5: Site assessment form a. http://bit.ly/Site_Assessment_Form 6. Exhibit 6: Report Of A Solid Waste Characterization And Cost Saving Proposal a. http://bit.ly/Proposal_Example 7. Exhibit 7: Food Rescue Info a. http://bit.ly/LHFoodRescue