Resolution Number 10-10-05-01RESOLUTION NO.10-10--05-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN
CAPISTRANO, , CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING ITS ARTICLE XIIIB
APPROPRIATION LIMITATION (GANN LIMIT) FOR THE 2010/20/1
FISCAL YEAR
WHEREAS, the voters of California on November 6, 1979, added Article
XIIIB to the State Constitution placing various limitations on the appropriation of the
State and local governments; and,
WHEREAS, Article XIIIB provides that the appropriation limit for the fiscal
year 2010/2011 is calculated by adjusting the base year appropriations of fiscal year
1978/1979, if desired, with changes in California per capita personal income or non-
residential assessed valuation and changes in City or County populations, and the
recalculations of appropriation limits from the 198611987 fiscal year stipulated by
Proposition 111; and,
WHEREAS, the City reserves the right to adjust its 2010111 limit as
information regarding the change in non --residential assessed valuation due to new
construction is made available by the County; and,
WHEREAS, the information necessary for making these adjustments is
attached as Exhibit A; and,
WHEREAS, the City of San Juan Capistrano has complied with all the
provisions of Article XIIIB and amendments thereto per Proposition 111 in determining
the appropriation limits for fiscal year 2010/2011.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
San Juan Capistrano does hereby establish that the appropriation limit for 2010/2011
shall be $55,546,227.
The City of San Juan Capistrano Budget Appropriation subject to the limit
for fiscal year 2010/2011 shall be $16,442,1...°`
PASSED, APPROVED, AND AD
day of October, 2010.
c
STATE.OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) sse
CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO }
I, MARIA MORRIS, appointed City Clerk of the City of San Juan Capistrano, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No. 10-10-05-01 was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of
San Juan Capistrano at a Regular meeting thereof, held the 5" day of October 2010, by the
following vote:
AYE : COUNCIL MEMBERS: Allevato, Nribar, Nielsen, Freese and Mayor Uso
NO '?�. COUNCIL MEMBER: None
AB IV` _ COUNCIL MEMBER: None
, Citj)QIerk
ARTICLE XIIIB APPROPRIATION LIMIT
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010/2011
Total 1978-79 Appropriation $10,675,720
Less: Non -Proceeds of Taxes for 1978-79 2,623,658
Debt Service 1,127,836
Total 3,751,494 ( 3,751,494)
1978-79 Base Year Appropriation Limit $6,924,226
1979-80 Calculation
Add: CPI or California Per Capita Income
for 1979-80 (whichever is lower) and
change in City's population:
CPI - 10.71%
Population Change for 1979 - 3.30%
Appropriation Limit for 1979-80 $7,880,158
1980-81 Calculation
Add: CPI or California Per Capita Income
for 1980-81 (whichever is lower) and
change in City's population:
CPl - 12.11%
Population Change for 1980 - 4.01%
Appropriation Limit for 1980-81 $9,188,706
1981-82 Calculation
Add: CPI or California Per Capita Income
for 1981-82 (whichever is lower) and
change in City's population:
CPI - 9.12%
Population Change for 1981 - 4.14%
Appropriation Limit for 1981-82 $10,441,822
1
EXHIBIT A
ARTICLE X1IIB APPROPRIATION LIMIT
FOR FISCAL YEAR 201012011
1982-83 Calculation
Add: CPI or California Per Capita Income
for 1982-83 (whichever is lower) and
change in City's population:
CPI - 6.79%
Population Change for 1982 - 2.84%
Appropriation Limit for 1982-83 $11,4671505
1983-84 Calculation
Add: CPI or California Per Capita Income
for 1983-84 (whichever is lower) and
change in City's population:
CPI - 2.35%
Population Change for 1983 - 3.75%
Appropriation Limit for 1983-84 $12,177,128
1984-85 Calculation
Add: CPI or California Per Capita Income
for 1984-85 (whichever is lower) and
change in City's population:
CPI - 4.74%
Population Change for 1984 - 2.42%
Appropriation Limit for 1984-85 $13,062,978
1985-86 Calculation
Add: CPI or California Per'Capita Income
for 1985-86 (whichever is lower) and
change in City's population.
CPI - 3.74%
Population Change for 1985 - 4.19%
Appropriation Limit for 1985-86 $14,119,343
2
ARTICLE XIIIB APPROPRIATION LIMIT
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010/2011
1986-87 Calculation
Add: CPI or California Per Capita Income
for 1986-87 (whichever is lower) and
change in City's population:
CPI - 2.30%
Population Change for 1986 - 2.89%
Appropriation Limit for 198687 $14,861,522
1987-88 Calculation
Add: Either growth in California Per Capita Income
for 1987-88 (3.47%) or the growth in non-residential
assessed valuation (N/A) and either population growth
within the City (5.24%) or the County (1.99%)
Per Capita Income Growth - 3.47%
City's Population Growth for 1987 - 5.24%
Appropriation Limit for 1987-88 $16,182,983
1988-89 Calculation
Add: Either growth in California Per Capita Income
for 1988-89 (4.66%) or the growth in non-residential
assessed valuation (N/A) and either population growth
within the City (2.70%) or the County (1.98%)
Per Capita Income Growth 4.66%
City's Population Growth for 1988 - 2.70%
Appropriation Limit for 1988-89 $17,394,412
ARTICLE XIIIB APPROPRIATION LIMIT
FOR FISCAL YEAR 20101.2011
1989-90 Calculation
Add: Either growth in California Per Capita Income
for 1989-90 (5.19%) or the growth in non-residential
assessed valuation (0:0028%) and either population growth
within the City (0.43%) or the. County (1.85%)
Per Capita Income Growth - 5.19%
County's Population Growth for 1989 - 1.85%
Appropriation Limit for 1989-90 $18,635,679
1990-91 Calculation
Add: Either growth in California Per Capita Income
for 1990-91 (4.21%) car the growth in non-residential
assessed valuation (0.2846°/x) and either population growth
within the City (3.15%) or the County (2.00%)
Per Capita Income Growth - 4.21 %
City's Population Growth for 1990 - 3.15%
Appropriation Limit for 1990-91 $201031,979
1991-92 Calculation
Add. Either growth in California Per Capita Income
for 1991-92 (4.14%) or the growth in non-residential
assessed valuation (0.2846%) and either population growth
within the City (3.16%) or the County (2.30%)
Per Capita Income Growth - 4.14%
City's Population Growth for 1991 - 3.16%
Appropriation Limit for 1991-92 $21,520,520
4
ARTICLE XIIIB APPROPRIATION LIMIT
FOR FISCAL YEAR 201012011
1992-93 Calculation
Add: Either growth in California Per Capita Income
for 1992-93 (-.0.64%) or the growth in non-residential
assessed valuation (0.5485%) and either population growth
within the City (2.56°/x) or the County (2.47%)
Non-residential assessed valuation Growth - 0.54%
City's Population Growth for 1992 - 2.56%
Appropriation Limit for 1992-93
1993-94 Calculation
Add: Either growth in California Per Capita Income
for 1993-94 (2.72%) or the growth in non-residential
assessed valuation (.012%) and either population growth
within the City (1.77%) or the County (2.15%)
Per Capita Income Growth - 2.72%
County's Population Growth for 1993 - 2.15%
$22,190,631
Appropriation Limit for 1993-94 $23,284,292
1994-95 Calculation
Add: Either growth in California Per Capita Income
for 199495 (0.71 %) or the growth in non-residential
assessed valuation (0.09%) and either population growth
within the City (1.44%) or the County (1.64%)
Per Capita Income Growth - 0.71%
County's Population Growth for 1994 - 1.64%
Appropriation Limit for 1994-95
5
$23,834,184
ARTICLE XI11B APPROPRIATION LIMIT
FOR FISCAL YEAR 201012011
1995-96 Calculation
Add: Either growth in California Per Capita Income
for 1995-96 (4:72°/x) or the growth in non-residential
assessed valuation (0.16%) and. either population growth
within the City (2.81%) or the County (1.72%)
Per Capita Income Growth - 4.72%
City's Population Growth for 1995 - 2.81 %
Appropriation Limit for 1995-96
1996-97 Calculation
Acid: Either growth in California Per Capita Income
for 1996-97 (4.67%) or the growth in cion -residential
assessed valuation (0.28%) and either population growth
within the City (1.11 %) or the County (1.05%)
Per Capita Income Growth - 4.67%
City's Population Growth for 1996 - 1.11 %
$25,660,510
Appropriation Limit for 1996-97 $27,156,989
1997-98 Calculation
Add: Either growth in California Per Capita Income
for 1997-98 (4.67%) or the growth in non-residential
assessed valuation (0.32%) and either population growth
within the City (2.11%) or the County (1.07°/x)
Per Capita Income Growth - 4.67%
City's Population Growth for 1997 - 2.11 %
Appropriation Limit for 1997-98
10
$29,024,992
ARTICLE XIIIB APPROPRIATION LIMIT
FOR FISCAL YEAR 201012011
1998-99 Calculation
Add.-- Either growth in California Per Capita income
for 1998-99 (4.15%) or the growth in non-residential
assessed valuation (0.30%) and either population growth
within the.City (4.13°/x) or the County (1.69%}
Per Capita Income Growth - 4.15%
City's Population Growth for 1998 - 4.13%
Appropriation Limit for 1998-99 $31,477,603
1999-2000 Calculation
Add: Either growth in California Per Capita Income
for 1999-00 (4.53%) or the growth in non-residential
assessed valuation ( 0.53%) and either population growth
within the City (2.84%) or the County (1.77%)
Per Capita Income Growth - 4.53%
City's Population Growth for 1999 - 2.84%
Appropriation Limit for 1999-2000 $33,835,275
2000-2401 Calculation
Add: Either growth in California Per Capita Income
for 2000-01 (4.91 %) or the growth in non-residential
assessed valuation (0.87%) and either population growth
within the City (0.75%) or the County (1.56%)
Per Capita Income Growth - 4.91%
County's Population Growth for 2000 - 1.56%
Appropriation Limit for 2000-2001 $36,050,335
7
ARTICLE XIIIB APPROPRIATION LIMIT
FOR FISCAL YEAR 201012011
2001-2002 Calculation
Add: Either growth in California Per Capita Income
for 2001-02 (7.82°/x) or the growth in non-residential
assessed valuation (0.73%) and either population growth
within the City (1 Al %) or the County (2.02%)
Per Capita Income Growth - 7.82%
County's Population Growth for 2001 - 2.02%
Appropriation Limit for 2001-2002 $39,654,635
2002-2003 Calculation
Add; Either growth in California Per Capita Income
for 2002-03 (-1.27%) Or the growth in non-residential
assessed valuation (0.61 %) and either population growth
within the City (1.82°/x) or the County (2.06°/x)
Non -Residential Assessed Valuation Growth — 0.61 %
County's Population Growth for 2002 - 2.06%
Appropriation Limit for 2002-2003
2003-2004 Calculation
Add: Either growth in California Per Capita Income
for 2003-04 (2.31 %) or the growth in non-residential
assessed valuation (0.12%) and either population growth
within the City (1.73°/x) or the County (1.65%)
Per Capita Income Growth - 2.31 %
City's Population Growth for 2003 - 1.73%
$407720,232
Appropriation Limit for 2003-2004 $42,381,602
ARTICLE XIIIB APPROPRIATION LIMIT
FOR FISCAL YEAR. 201012011
2004-2005 Calculation
Add: Either growth in California Per Capita Income
for 2004-05 (3.28%) or the growth in non-residential
assessed valuation for 2004-05 (0.29%) and either population growth
within the City (1.82°/x) or the County (1.42%)
Per Capita Income Growth — 3.28%
City's Population Growth for 2004 —1.82%
Appropriation Limit for 2004-2005 $44,568,364
2005-2006 Calculation
Add: Either growth in. California Per Capita Income
for 2005-06 (5.26%) or the growth in non-residential
assessed valuation for 2005-06 (0.09%) and either population growth
within the City (0.59%) or the County (1.13%)
Per Capita Income Growth -- 5.26%
County's Population Growth for 2005 — 1.13%
Appropriation Limit for 2005-2006 $47,442,773
2006-2007 Calculation
Add: Either growth in California Per Capita Income
for 2006-07 (3.96%) or the growth in non-residential
assessed valuation for 2006-07 (4.11 %) and either population growth
within the City (0.34%) or the County (0.83%)
Per Capita Income Growth — 4.11 %
County's Population Growth for 2006 — 0.83%
Appropriation Limit for 2006-2007 $49,801,732
9
ARTICLE XIIIB APPROPRIATION LIMIT
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010/2011
2007-2008 Calculation
Add: Either growth in California Per Capita Income
for 2007-08 (4.42%) or the growth in non-residential
assessed valuation for 2007-08 (0.99%) and either population growth
within the City (0.88%) or the County (0.84%)
Per Capita Income Growth — 4.42%
County`s, Population Growth for 2007 — 0.88%
Appropriation Limit for 2007-2008 $521460,595
2008-2009 Calculation
Add: Either growth in California Per Capita Income
for 2008-09 (4.29%) or the growth in non-residential
assessed valuation for 2008-09 and either population growth
within the City (1.37%) or the County (1.02%)
Per Capita Income Growth -- 4.29%
County's Population Growth for 2008 —1.37%
Appropriation Limit for 2008-2009 $55,460,697
2009-2010 Calculation
Add: Either growth in California Per Capita Income
for 2009-10 (0.62%) or the growth in non-residential
assessed valuation for 2009-10 (0.28%) and either population growth
within the City (0.67%) or the County (1.02%)
Per Capita Income Growth — 0.62%
County's Population Growth for 2009 — 1.02%
Appropriation Limit for 2009-2010 $56,373,760
Calculation of Appropriations Subject to Limit.
10
ARTICLE X11113 APPROPRIATION LIMIT
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010/2011
Appropriation Limit for 2009110
Budgeted Appropriations:
Less Nan -Proceeds of Taxes
DEBT SERVICE
EXEMPT REVENUE
Current Year's Appropriation from
proceeds of taxes
Change in Fund Balance
Total Appropriations Subject to the Limit
Difference between the limit and
appropriations subject to the limit
11
$56,373,760
$32,735,028
(9,780,277)
(1,738,596)
0
$21,216,165
_6,352,310)
$14,863,845
$41,509,914
ARTICLE XIIII3 APPROPRIATION LIMIT
FOR FISCAL YEAR 201012011
Appropriation Limit for 2009-2010 $56,373,760
20102011 Calculation
Add: Either growth in California Per Capita Income
for 2010-11 (-2.54%) or the growth in non-residential
assessed valuation for 2010-11 (pending) and either population growth
within the City (1.10%) or the County (1.01 %)
Per Capita Income Growth: -2.54%
County's Population Growth: 1.10%
Appropriation Limit for 2010-2011
Calculation of Appropriations Subject to Limit:
Appropriation Limit for 2010111 "
Budgeted Appropriations:
Less: Non -Proceeds of Taxes
DEBT SERVICE
EXEMPT REVENUE
Current Year's Appropriation from
proceeds of taxes
Change in Fund Balance
Total Appropriations Subject to the Limit
Difference between the limit and
appropriations subject to the limit
12
$55,546,227
$55,546,227
$30,435,730
(9,497,633)
(3,184,564)
0
$17,753,533
(1,311,354)
$16,442,188
$39,104,039