Loading...
Resolution Number 85-5-21-5269 RESOLUTION NO. CRA 85-5-21-5 APPROVING A REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL (REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 84-1) A RESOLUTION OF THE SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING A REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Juan Capistrano by Ordinance No. 488 approved a Redevelopment Plan for the Central Redevelopment Project (the "Project"), and by Ordinance No. 509 approved an amendment thereto (the "1983 Amendment"); and, WHEREAS, the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Juan Capistrano (the "Agency") is considering the adoption of a further amendment (the "Proposed Amendment") to the Redevelopment Plan, and has prepared a Preliminary Report, as provided for by statute, in connection therewith; and, WHEREAS, the Agency has requested that the City Council call a joint public hearing concerning the Proposed Amendment; and, WHEREAS, in connection with such proceedings, the Agency desires to submit to the City Council a report incorporated herein and attached hereto as Exhibit "A" (the "Report"). NOW, THEREFORE, the San Juan Capistrano Community Redevelopment Agency does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1. The Agency approves the Report (Exhibit "A") and authorizes and directs the Executive Director to transmit such Report to the City Council. May ATTEST: MENZ yr yZ PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 91-t day of 1985 -1- 270 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO ) I, MARY ANN HANOVER, Secretary of the San Juan Capistrano Community Redevelopment Agency, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. CRA 85-5-21-5 , adopted by the Board of Directors of the San Juan Capistrano Community Redevelopment Agency at a regular meeting thereof held on the 21st day of May 19g9, by the following vote: AYES: Directors Friess, Bland, Schwartze, Buchheim and Chairman Hausdorfer NOES: None ABSENT: None /f (SEAL) MARY A OV�I ER, AGENCY SECRETARY -2- 2'71 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO ) MARY ANN HANOVER, being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That she is the duly appointed and qualified Secretary of the San Juan Capistrano Community Redevelopment Agency; That in compliance with State laws of the State of California and in further compliance with Resolution No. CRA 83-12-20-1 and on the 25th day of May , 1985, she caused to be posted: RESOLUTION NO. CRA 85-5-21-5 being: APPROVING A REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL (REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 84-1) A RESOLUTION OF THE SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING A REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL in three (3) public places in the City of San Juan Capistrano, to wit: City Hall; Old Fire Station Recreation Complex; Orange County Public Library. 0RNOVER, Seycre San Juan Capistrano Community Redevelopment Agency CHECK LIST RES. NO. CRA _A _Chairman has signed _Secretary has signed _Agency Seal stamped All blanks typed in "Absent" "Noes" _Typed in Official Record Book _Posted to Classified Car Copies sent to (g .11' r. Legal Publication otdereld to be published (date) No. Affidavits i No. Printed copies required 7 7U— Remarks e, -3- 2'73 P R E L I M I N A R Y R E P O R T AMENDMENT 84-1 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 2'74 REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL ON AMENDMENT 84-1 TO THE SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO CENTRAL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT 1 t 1R Yum J ueu. a.nraa a aww ................ .......... mon gc& a mm Aft I fjONIY7Lmm MVC'11 Mm May, 1985 N EXHIBIT A TABLE OF CONTENTS 2'75 Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 REASONS FOR SELECTION OF THE ADDED AREA 4 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PHYSICAL, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL CONDITIONS IN THE ADDED AREA 6 3.1 General Characteristics of the Area to be added to the Central Redevelopment Project Area ("The Added Area"). 6 3.1.1 Land Use 6 3.1.2 Ownership 7 3.1.3 Circulation 7 = 3.1.4 Zoning 8 3.2 Blighting Factors Indicating Economic 16 Dislocation, Deterioration, or Disuse General Financing Methods Available to Agency (Section 33032) 8 3.2.1 Inadequate Public Improvements, Public Facilities, Open Space, and Utilities (Section 33032.c) 9 3.2.2 Depreciated Values, Impaired Investments, Social and Economic Maladjustment (Section 33032.d) 14 3.3 Urbanized Area 16 4.0 METHOD OF FINANCING THE PROJECT 16 4.1 General Financing Methods Available to Agency 16 4.2 Estimated Agency Costs 17 4.3 Proposed Financing Method 17 4.4 Tax Increment Limitations and Requirements 18 2 �V � TABLE OF CONTENTS Continued Page 5.0 PLAN AND METHOD OF RELOCATION 20 5.1 General 20 5.2 Administrative Organization 20 5.2.1 Responsible Agency 20 5.2.2 Functions 21 5.3 Relationships with Site Occupants 23 5.4 Assistance to Businesses 23 5.5 Temporary Moves 24 5.6 Relocation Standards 25 5.7 Grievance Procedures 25 6.0 ANALYSIS OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAN 25 7.0 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT REPORT 27 7.1 Description of the Proposed Project Area and Surrounding Areas 27 7.2 Relocation 27 7.2.1 Number of Dwelling Units Expected to be Destroyed or Removed 27 7.2.2 Number of Persons Expected to be Displaced 27 7.2.3 General Location of Housing to be Rehabilitated or Constructed 28 7.2.4 Number of Dwelling Units Planned for Construction or Rehabilitation, Other than Replacement Housing 28 7.2.5 Projected Means of Financing Proposed Dwelling Units for Construction of Rehabilitation 28 7.2.6 Projected Timetable for Meeting Plans 28 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 '717 (Continued) Page 7.3 Traffic Circulation 28 7.4 Public Services and Utilities 29 7.5 Property Assessments and Taxes 29 8.0 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON THE PROPOSED CENTRAL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT 30 9.0 A SUMMARY OF MEETINGS AND COMMUNICATIONS WITH PROJECT AREA RESIDENTS AND COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS CONCERNING THE PROPOSED CENTRAL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT 30 10.0 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 30 11.0 REPORT OF THE ORANGE COUNTY FISCAL OFFICER 30 12.0 REPORT OF FISCAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 30 13.0 ANALYSIS OF THE REPORT OF THE COUNTY FISCAL OFFICER, INCLUDING A SUMMARY OF CONSULTATIONS WITH EACH TAXING AGENCY 30 2'78 REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL ON AMENDMENT 84-1 TO THE SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO CENTRAL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report to the City Council on the Redevelopment Plan for the Central Redevelopment Project has been prepared pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law, Health and Safety Code, Sections 33352 and 33354.6, which states that every redevelopment plan submitted by the San Juan Capistrano Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency") to the legislative body (the City Council) or an amendment adding territory to an existing redevel- opment project area shall be accompanied by a report containing: A. The reasons for the selection of the project are. B. A description of the physical, social and economic conditions existing in the area. C. The proposed method of financing the redevelopment of the project area. D. A method or plan for the relocation of families, persons and business concerns to be temporarily or permanently displaced from facilities in the project area. E. The analysis of the Preliminary Plan for the San Juan Capistrano Central Redevelopment Project. F. The report and recommendations of the Planning Commission regarding the project. G. Report required by Section 65402 of the Government Code: Report of Planning Commission as to conformity of proposed project with General Plan. H. The Environmental Impact Report for the San Juan Capistrano Central Redevelopment Project. I. Report of the Orange County Fiscal Officer, if any. J. Report of the Fiscal Review Committee, if any. K. Neighborhood Impact Report. L. Analysis by the Commission of the Report of the Orange County Fiscal Officer, if any, including a summary of the consultations with each taxing agency. 1 27g The amendment under consideration follows the adoption of the redevelopment plan adopted on July, 1983, by Ordinance No. 488. The plan was subsequently amended on May 15, 1984, by Ordinance No. 509. Consideration of amendment 94-1 is governed by the Cali- fornia Health and Safety Code, including Sections 33030, 33031 and 33020.1 which provide as follows: ' 33030. It,. is found and declared that there exist in many communities !t blighted areas which constitute either physical, social, or economic liabilities, requiring re- development in the interest of the health, safety, and general welfare of the people of such communities and of the state. A blighted area is one which is characterized by one or more of those conditions set forth in Sections 33031 or 33032, causing a reduction of, or lack of, proper utilization of the area to such an extent that it constitutes a.serious physical, social, or economic burden on the community which cannot reasonably be expected to be reversed or alleviated by private enterprise acting alone. 33031. A blighted area is 'characterized by the existence of buildings and structures, used or intended to be used for living, commercial, industrial, or other purposes, or any combination of such uses, which are unfit or unsafe to occupy for such purposes and are conducive to ill health, trans- mission of disease, infant mortality, juvenile delinquency, and crime because of any one or a combination of the following factors: (a) Defective design and character of physical construc- tion. (b) Faulty interior arangement and exterior spacing. (c) High density of populaton and overcrowding. (d) Inadequate provision for ventilation, light, sanita- tion, open spaces, and recreation facilities. (e) Age, obsolescence, deterioration, dilapidation, mixed character, or shifting of uses. 33032. A blighted area is characterized by properties which suffer from economic dislocation, deterioration, or disuse. because of one or more of the following factors which cause a reduction of, or lack of, proper utilization of the area to such.,: an extent that it constitutes a serious physical, social, or,_,- economic burden on the community which cannot reasonably be ex-, petted to he reversed or alleviated by private enterprise acting alone: (a) The subdividing and sale of lots of irregular form and shape and inadequate size for proper usefulness and development. (b) The laying out of lots in disregard of the contours and other topography or physical characteristics of the ground and surrounding conditions. (c) The existence of inadequate public improvements, public facilities, open spaces, and utilities which cannot be remedied by private or governmental action without redevelop- ment. (d) A prevalence of depreciated values, impaired invest- ments, and social and economic maladjustment. 33320.1. "Project area" means, except as provided in Section 33320.2 or 33320.3, a predominantly urbanized area of a community which is a blighted area, the redevelopment of which is necessary to effectuate the public purposes declared in this part, and which is selected by the planning commission pursuant to Section 33322. . 3 281 As used in this section,, "predominantly urbanized" means that not less than 80 percent of the privately owned property, in the project area has been or is developed for urban uses, is characterized by the conditions described in subdivisions (a) or (b) of Section 33.032, or is an integral part of an area developed for urban uses. For the purposes of this section, a parcel of property as shown on the official maps of the county assessor is developed if that parcel is developed in a manner which is either consistent with zoning or is otherwise permitted under law. For the purposes of this section, if property is acquired by the community less than 180 days prior to the date of adoption of the survey area resolution and is not dedicated or devoted to a public use on the date the survey area resolu- tion is adopted, that property shall be deemed privately owned property. The requirement that a project be predominantly urbanized shall apply only to a project area for which a final redevelop- ment plan is adopted on or after January 1, 1984, or to an area which is added to a project area by an amendment to a redevelop- ment plan, which amendment is adopted on or after January 1, 1984. 2.0 REASONS FOR SELECTION OF THE ADDED AREA The primary reasons for selection of the Added Area (Ex- hibit A) are to overcome a number of obstacles to appropriate development of the urban core of San Juan Capistrano, and to remove or alleviate a number of existing burdens to the communi ty. The core, including.the_Added Area, is subject to extensive regional vehicular impacts that require mitigation through new roed- way construction, bridge improvements and related public improvements. These improvements are beyond the implementation abiTity'bf'-fff iV1- dual,adjacent property owners and in most instances beyond the -- capability of City or County improvem.,it programs. Witnout these improvements the existing c =iriereial and residential problems within the core area will not he r--soi,,�, Additional reasons for selection of the Added Area include but are not limited to: A. Correction of the defective design and character of physical construction, particularly in the areas of: 1) access improvements; 2) undergrounding of power and communication lines; 3) correction of street improvement deficiencies such as broken pavements, sidewalks, curbs and storm water drainage; 4) implementation of appropriate buffers between commerical and residential land uses. B. Resolution of the economic dislocation, deterioration and disuse which has resulted from faulty planning 0 282 Plan. G. Provision, within the core area, of the proper mix within the core area and the Added Area. The historic commercial services for the residents of San development of the core area and the Added Area needs some "fine tuning" in order to convert existing patterns of development to the needs of today and the Implementation of the plan with a minimum of future. This cannot be accomplished without the of a coordinated efforts of a redevelopment program. development. 1. Im rove Inadequate Local and Regional Circulation C. Correction of existing lot subdivision patterns which are irregularly shaped and contain undersized parcels for appropriate development. D. Provision of adequate public improvements, public facilities, open spaces and utilities. E. Improvement of the existing situation of depreciated values, impaired investment and economic maladjustment which has resulted from the declining commercial environment in San Juan Capistrano or by the lack of necessary public improvements and by flooding. F. Creation and expansion, wherever feasible, of employ- ment opportunities including employment in reconstruction and execution of the Redevelopment San Juan Capistrano's Central Business District is currently burdened with severe traffic congestion resulting from inadequate access to the I-5 Freeway from the surrounding region. Currently, the only access to the freeway for the region is through the Central Business District, resulting in unacceptably high levels of traffic congestion. In order to alleviate this condition, the Agency proposes participation in the construction and improvement of additional roads and freeway interchanges to the north 5 Plan. G. Provision, within the core area, of the proper mix of commercial services for the residents of San Juan Capistrano. H. Achievement of an environment reflecting concern for architectural and urban design principles. I. Implementation of the plan with a minimum of resi- dential dislocation while insuring the provision of a well designed and economically viable area for development. 1. Im rove Inadequate Local and Regional Circulation atterns San Juan Capistrano's Central Business District is currently burdened with severe traffic congestion resulting from inadequate access to the I-5 Freeway from the surrounding region. Currently, the only access to the freeway for the region is through the Central Business District, resulting in unacceptably high levels of traffic congestion. In order to alleviate this condition, the Agency proposes participation in the construction and improvement of additional roads and freeway interchanges to the north 5 283 and south which will provide alternative access to and from the freeway. These improvements will benefit the Central Business District and the Added Area and will be a valuable contribution to the regional circulation system. Portions of the Added Area have also had access impaired or cut off entirely by construction of the I-5 Freeway. Public improvements are proposed to the Added Area in order to restore proper access (Exhibit B). 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PHYSICAL, ECONOMIC, AND SOCIAL CONDITIONS San Juan Capistrano is unique among Orange County communi- ties, primarily because of its rich history. The community began with the establishment of the Mission San Juan Capistrano in 1776. In 1961, San Juan Capistrano became an incorporated City with a population of 1,278. Today the City covers 12 square miles and has a population of 21,000. The San Diego Freeway, built in the late 1950's, transects the City from north to south, and has served to increase pressures for growth in San Juan Capistrano and in Orange County as a whole. The rapid suburban settlement of the County has caused vast areas to be built up over a brief period of time. This rapid regional growth has created a severe strain on the public improvements and infrastructure within San Juan's Central Redevelopment Project Area and within the Added Area proposed for inclusion. Public improvements in these areas are in- adequate to accommodate present and anticipated increases in traffic and parking, as well as flood control and erosion problems and other associated dificulties which have resulted from the rapid development of the surrounding region. The inadequacy thus operates as a deterrent to further development. Proper growth and development of the Added Area will continue to be inhibited until these problems can be dealt with effectively through redevelopment. 3.1 General Characteristics of the Added Area 3.1.1 Land Use The Added Area consists of a variety of land uses, as indicated in the General Plan, including low to high density residential, commercial, industrial, public and institutional, and open space. The E area is composed of eight project sites (SAS, Williams, Endevco, TrammelCrow, Honeyman, Ortega, Arosa, and Lyon) divided into three sub -areas which total approximately 170 acres (Exhibit A). Of this, 23 acres have been developed, 42+ acres are vacant but totally undevelopable due to steep slopes, floodplains, etc., the remainder of the area is presently undeveloped. 3.1.2 Ownership The Added Area contains approximately 35 parcels. The major landowner for each project site is: Fred Ash and Sons; Rachelam T. Daniel; Aminta NV; Crow -San Juan Ranch; Romarco Realty Corporation; Ortega Properties; Melford Developments; and 8rinderson Development Corporation.) 3.1.3 Circulation The areas proposed to be amended to the Central Redevelopment Project Area are situated along the east side of Interstate 5 (San Diego Freeway). State Route 74 (Ortega Highway) intersects the proposed Added Area approximately midway, just east of the City's commercial core (Exhibit A). One of the major issues for the Added Area is the need to improve circulation and access within the area by upgrading existing roads and constructing new roads. A second major need is to improve access between the Added Area and the City to the west of the freeway, especially between the Ortega project site and City's downtown commercial core. The Circulation Element of the General Plan addresses many of the roadway improvments needed to alleviate the traffic congestion and poor access blighting the Added Area. )Orange County Assessor's Office, Property Owner Listing, FY84-85. NOTE: Unless otherwise noted, reference documents are on file in the City's Department of CP R D. 7 3.1.4 Zoning 2 V' QoN The zoning for the Added Area is consistent with the land uses designated in the City's General Plan.2 3.2 Blighting Factors Indicatin Economic Dislocation Deterioration, or Disuse ISection 33032 Blighted areas in San Juan Capistrano constitute social and economic liabilities, or both, and require redevelopment in the interest of the health, safety, and general welfare of the people in the community. In the areas proposed to be amended to the Central Redevelopment Project area, blight is characterized by one or more of the following conditions: (1) lots of irregular form and shape and inadequate size for proper usefulness and development; (2) inadequate public improvements, public facilities, open spaces, and utilities; and (3) prevalence of depreciated values, impaired investments, and social and economic maladjustment. The presence of lots of deficient size and arrangement to accommodate appropriate development have negatively impacted the Added Area, in particular subarea 2. The Redevelopment Agency could substantially enhance the development viability of the subarea by consolidating and redesigning parcels in order to (1) accommodate a secondary vehicular access and (2) provide suitable locations for large scale development. Improving the overall circulation system is key to attracting desirable development to the site. At present, the heavily traveled Ortega Highway is the project area's only point of access. The proposed secondary access would cross the freeway below Ortega Highway and connect the southern portion of the Ortega project site with the downtown. The Agency could further enhance the site's internal circulation by connecting the existing cul -de -sated streets to the new secondary access. Another important key to facilitating desirable development in the project area is the creation of appropriate sites for larger scale business and industrial uses. This would require the Agency to reassemble various parcels and modify the existing infrastructure which was intended to serve smaller lots. 2San Juan Capistrano Municipal Code, Volume 2, 1980. 3Health and Safety Code, Section 33032. a - d. 96 3.2.1 Existence of Inade uate Public m rovements, u is aci sties, Open UP , an utilities is annot e - eme ie rivate or Governmentalc ion t 7out a eve opment ection c All parcels proposed for inclusion within the Central Redevelopment Project area are impacted by this form of blight. Examples of constraints on development which are essentially beyond the control of private developers and may require redevelopment assistance are insufficient sewage capacity at the South East Regional Reclamation Authority (SERRA) sewage treatment plant, and the need to provide major street improvements of county -wide benefit which may be beyond the means of individual developers.) The Redevelopment Agency could assist in overcoming these difficulties in the following ways: The Agency could facilitate expansion of the capacity of the existing sewage treatment plant or assist in the construction of a new treatment plant to serve the Redevelopment area. With the expansion of sewage facilities, the Redevelopment Agency could further mitigate development costs by agreeing to extend sewer service to project areas in need. 1See Draft Environmental Impact Reports for the City of San Juan Capistrano: Ortega Highway Properties, January, 1978 Brinderson William Lyon Company Apartment Complex, April, 1984 Forster Canyon Planned Community, November, 19.80 Swanner and Williams Properties, 1976 Honeyman Ranch, November, 1978 San Juan Capistrano Convention Hotel Complex, October, 1982 4 L The Redevelopment Plan Added Area encompasses a total of 170 acres and is composed of eight project sites situated on the east side of the I5 Freeway. For descriptive purposes, the Added Area has been divided into three subareas (Exhibit A). The need for street and highway improvements is documented in the following paragraphs for each subarea: Area 1 SAS/Williams/Endevco/Trammel- row oneyman - This area consists of five project sites totaling 75 acres. Approximately 13+ acres are currently developed. All of the project sites are adjacent to Rancho Viejo Road. At present, improvements are needed for RanchoViejo Road from the northern City ts to approximately 150 feet south of Malaspina Road (Exhibit B). This portion of the road is two lane and in poor condition in many areas. Nearly half the needed improvements to Rancho Viejo Road cannot be incurred by the private sector. As a result, these improvements are proposed to be undertaken with assistance from the Redevelopment Agency. Both the City's Master Plan of .Streets and Highways (MPSH) and the County of Orange Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) r designate Rancho Viejo Road as a secondary arterial. Upgrading Rancho Viejo Road to 10 287 ° Coupled with Agency support of Senate Bill 201 and City Council Ordinance No. 424, requiring mandatory dedication of land and/or money for schools, the Redevelopment Agency could, on the behalf of a developer, -- contribute a portion of the required =---; fees to the school district. vY+^fir". The Agency could assist in ' implementing major street improvementsT to facilitate adequate circulation within the various areas to be amended as well as between the existing Central Re e3 veoppment Project area and the amendment areas. The Redevelopment Plan Added Area encompasses a total of 170 acres and is composed of eight project sites situated on the east side of the I5 Freeway. For descriptive purposes, the Added Area has been divided into three subareas (Exhibit A). The need for street and highway improvements is documented in the following paragraphs for each subarea: Area 1 SAS/Williams/Endevco/Trammel- row oneyman - This area consists of five project sites totaling 75 acres. Approximately 13+ acres are currently developed. All of the project sites are adjacent to Rancho Viejo Road. At present, improvements are needed for RanchoViejo Road from the northern City ts to approximately 150 feet south of Malaspina Road (Exhibit B). This portion of the road is two lane and in poor condition in many areas. Nearly half the needed improvements to Rancho Viejo Road cannot be incurred by the private sector. As a result, these improvements are proposed to be undertaken with assistance from the Redevelopment Agency. Both the City's Master Plan of .Streets and Highways (MPSH) and the County of Orange Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) r designate Rancho Viejo Road as a secondary arterial. Upgrading Rancho Viejo Road to 10 this level of service will require: a) wi_dgning" the road from two lanes to four r:q ageS� .1ngludi,ng a landscaped central `median; ::.b} in5ta11ing curb, gutter, and .street,,,lights,; : c) providing sidewalks and cdni;indi,rj' a+, ggional bikewayl along the east side .of a road; and d) landscaping along botKi'sides of the road. The latter is particularly important at the northern end of Rancho Viejo Road across from the SAS pr,Qject site. Here a landscape buffer As 'e���.d to mitigate freeway noise .and vi,sua1� 0ppoacts. Another important key to substantially improving traffic conditions along Rancho Viejo Road is to widen the narrow 24 -foot roadway at the Trabuco Creek Bride to accommodate four anes -of traffictrafficr an off road regional bikeway.3 Traffic volumes at the bridge warrant this ex- pansion which will eliminate the current bottleneck situation.4 Traffic volumes are also expected to warrant provision of a signal at the intersection of Rancho Viejo Road and Juni ero Serra Road.5 Junipero Serra Road at this ocation is shown as a primary arterial on both the City MPSH and the Conty MPAH and is also designated for a county -wide bikeway in the City's General Plan. lGeneral Plan Parks and Recreation Element, City of San Juan Capistrano, December, 1974. 2Traffic Impact Analysis of E1 Dorado Square Community Medical Center of San Juan Capistrano, City of San Juan Capistrano, October, 1981, 3General Plan Parks & Recreation Element, City of San Juan Capistrano, December, 1974. 4Dana Kasdan, Traffic Engineer, City of San Juan Capistrano, March, 1985. 50.rtega Highway ,Properties, Draft Environmental Impact Repprt, City of San Juan Capistrano, January, 1978. 11 L 289 In addition',,street improvements- are required. along the`(f�tegao,Hi hwa -. between 1-,5 .a�r�d -.R'a'ncho •;Vfgyo ais main hi;g�ii ay 13r, ide�itii`fie,d as a primary arterial l � by tw City: and County and serves both the Honeyman ;,,Ranch and the Ortega project sites. ..'Necessary improvements include widening .the road, and providing curb, gutter, sidewalks,, and landscaping along the north side. Area 2 - Orieo'. 7 This project site en- compasses approximately 48 acres. The area is presently undeveloped with the exception of an 8 -acre equestrian facility. The. development project proposed for the site includes a corporate headquarters for a research and development industrial park. Currently, the I-5 Freeway segregates the Ortega properties from Area "A" (Exhibit B). Area "A" is an 18 -acre parcel on the west side of the freeway and is the lo- cation for several commercial establish- ments. The City has identified Area "A" as a key site for commercial use in the City, with opportunities to accommodate a com- munity level shopping center. An essential component of the shopping center would be several large "anchor" uses that would unify the various parcels and realize the economic potential of the total area.1 In order to join Area "A" with the Ortega site and encourage a proper mix of uses, a circulation system is needed. The Rede- velopment Agency could aid in accomplishing this by constructing a new road connecting the two parcels. This link would also provide greater access to the southern por- tion of the Ortega parcel. Future modifi- cations and/or upgrading of the existing streets within the Ortega project site (such as Calle Arroyo, Paseo Tirador and Paseo Espada), may he necessary in order to adequately accommodate additional traffic generated by joining the two areas (Exhibit B). 1Paseo Capistrano Design for Development, Land Use and Circula- tion Plan for Area "A", San Juan Capistrano, March, 1982. 12 290 Area 3. - Lon%Arosa - This area consists of Tqo - un3ev o�pe, parcels, 19 acres (Lyon) r , � ,..�..(.LArosa). Each area is "propbsed - for'p,rimarily residential deve- Topment. The 'two' parcels are neighboring yet they lack a circulation system which would unify them and improve their access. tic, To To ramedy this, public assistance is needed n a to improve Road which parallels the _Valle I-5 Freeway south of San Juan Creek Road ,a and borders the Arosa project area (Exhibit B). As it presently exists, Valle Road, y from San Juan Creek Road to Forester Ranch Road, is one lane and in poor condition e lacking curb, gutter, street lights and landscaping on the east side of the street, and on portions of the west side. This road is designated as a commuter level street in the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways. However, this level of service is considered to be inadequate near the intersection of Valle Road and San Juan Creek Road.1 This is primarily due to the anticipated increase in traffic with the build out of several local projects, particularly the development of a large hotel complex at this location.2 Necessary improvements to Valle Road include: 1) widening the road to a minimum of forty feet and adding curb, gutter, street lights, sidewalks, and landscaping; 2) widening the freeway underpass at the intersection of Valle Road and San Juan Creek Road and installing a traffic signal. These improvements are needed to accommo- date increased traffic on San Juan Creek Road, a City and County designated primary arterial (84 feet in width), and Valle Road.3 At best, the present underpass can be widened from 48 feet to 58 feet. Sidewalks and bicycle paths will be placed 19ana Kasdan, Traffic Engineer, City .of San Juan Capistrano, March, 1985. 2,3San Juan Capistrano Convention Hotel Complex, Draft Environ- mental Impact Report, City of San Juan Capistrano, October, 1982. 13 291 3.2.2 The Prevalence of Dereciated Values, Impaired Investments, an Socialan Economic maladjustment(Section One major indication of economic malad- justment suggesting the need for public intervention by the Revelopment Agency is the slow pace of construction on parcels approved for development by the City. This has occurred on the majority of the parcels proposed for addition to the Redevelopment area. Of the eight individual parcels in question, Trammel -Crow was granted develop- ment approval in 1979, Ortega and Arosa were given approval in 1981, while one project was approved in each of the following years: SAS, 1982; Endevco, 1983; and Lyon, 1984. Neither the Williams nor the Honeyman projects have received final development approval. 10,ana Kasdan, Traffic Engineer, City of San Juan Capistrano, March, 1985. 2General Plan Map, City of San Juan Capistrano. 3Sah Juan Capistrano Convention Hotel Complex, Draft Environ- mental Impact, Report, City of San Juan Capistrano, October, 1982. 14 4g;hind the _ existing abutementsl; and 3) n nstall `,trdic at the juncture of „ plle ad an4 h*r_ Novia.2 This is needed 9r, to-.,�ttt a e,7_o__u a 1ve traffic impacts of several proposed projects in the area (Arosa, Glendale Federal, and the Convention Hotel Complex).3 An important additional improvement would 3e� be to extend Valle Road from its present sc terminus at Forster Ta ch Road south to connect with Camino Las Ramblas. This new road would greatly improve access to the "' Arosa and Lyon project sites and would create an important linkage between the two parcels. The proposed extension of Valle Road is noted on the City's General Plan map and on the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways. 3.2.2 The Prevalence of Dereciated Values, Impaired Investments, an Socialan Economic maladjustment(Section One major indication of economic malad- justment suggesting the need for public intervention by the Revelopment Agency is the slow pace of construction on parcels approved for development by the City. This has occurred on the majority of the parcels proposed for addition to the Redevelopment area. Of the eight individual parcels in question, Trammel -Crow was granted develop- ment approval in 1979, Ortega and Arosa were given approval in 1981, while one project was approved in each of the following years: SAS, 1982; Endevco, 1983; and Lyon, 1984. Neither the Williams nor the Honeyman projects have received final development approval. 10,ana Kasdan, Traffic Engineer, City of San Juan Capistrano, March, 1985. 2General Plan Map, City of San Juan Capistrano. 3Sah Juan Capistrano Convention Hotel Complex, Draft Environ- mental Impact, Report, City of San Juan Capistrano, October, 1982. 14 292 7h�. lack of .constr"uction activity can be ,as rrF" a d t infer of factors including pp n r @m t � fo5lowing: .. a) '` Feasibility of 'financing the develop- ment; z* b) Lack of existing infrastructure facilities; c) Cost of City requirements regarding public improvements' and affordable housing requirments.'` Of the above noted developments, the Lyon project has received specific financial assistance by the Redevelopment Agency.l As noted above, the Lyon project obtained City approval last'year to construct a 274 unit multifamily apartment complex. The developer intends to reserve 20 percent of the units (55) for low income families.2 The developer has indicated that development would be infeasible without Agency financial participation. Inclusion of this site within the Redevelop- ment Project area would help ensure that the necessary financial assistance is available to build this project. With respect to the Lyon project site, the Redevelopment Agency could lend assistance in upgrading Camino Las Ramblas, the main street serving the site, to a secondary arterial (as designated on the City and County Master Plans). This would include landscaping along the freeway side of the project. In addition, traffic volumes will soon warrant a signal at the intersection of Camino Las Ramblas and Via California.3 1TT 12276 (Brinderson Lyon ) Cooperation Agreement - CRA Reso- lution, 85-3-5-1 2Staff Report to the City Council for Tentative Tract 12276, December 4, 1984. 3The Brinderson-William Lyon Company Apartment Complex, Draft Focus Environmental Impact Report, City of San Juan Capistrano, April, 1984. 15 2V The, developer, is responsible for implementing striping and channelization phati . or, thest_relet " and for providing a 0 gn I at the entrance to the site from Camino Las Ramhlas.1 As part of the Redevelopment area, the Agency could, in accordance with redevelop- ment law, designate up to 20 percent of its tax "facrement towards the provision of affordable housing. In exchange for financial assistance to the developer, the Agency would require that: 1) a set percentage of the units are designated for low and very low income persons; 2) the units remain as apartments and not convert to condominiums for a minimum of 12 years; and 3) the property owner give preference to tenants referred to them by the Redev- elopment Agency. In this way the new housing may be used to shelter persons dis- placed by redevelopment activities from elsewhere in the project area. Realization of the Lyon project, besides meeting the goals of redevelopment, would help the City achieve one of th.e main objectives of the Housing Element of the General Plan which is to promote to the greatest extent possible the development of affordable housing within the City.2 3.3 Urbanized Area The Added Area is an integral part of an area developed for urban uses. It is linked by common circulation systems to urbanized areas and forms the central core of the community. The Added Area is predominantly urbanized and satisfies Section 33320.1 of the California Redevelopment Law. 4.0 METHOD OF FINANCING THE PROJECT 4.1 General Financing Methods Available to Agency The proposed amendment to the Redevelopment Plan authorizes the Agency to finance the Project .with. 1Resolution No. 84-7-17-6, Architectural Control 84-2 (Brin- derson/William Lyon Company) 2Housing Element of the General Plan, City of San Juan Capis- trano, November, 1984. 16 The fiscal impact of the amendment has been discussed as part of the Environmental documentation identified in Section 3.0 --essentially no adverse fiscal impacts are anticipated. Agency staff will continue to hold meetings with taxing agencies involved to insure that 19" no adverse fiscal impacts are created. It may be concluded generally that the Agency will have to look to sources in addition to tax increment revenues in order to finance the level of public improvements and other redevelopment activities contemplated. 4.3 Proposed Financing Method Preliminary review of the Agency's assumed program indicates that projected tax increment revenues and land disposition proceeds would be insufficient to meet estimated costs. Agency staff have identified additional funding sources which include surtax, CDBG and other sources. As available, gas tax funds from the State of California and the County of Orange will he used for the street system. Also, all or a portion of the parking may be installed through a parking authority or otherwise. Advances and loans for survey and planning and for the operating capital and for administration of this Project have been and are to be provided by the City until adequate funds are available or sufficiently assured to repay the loans and to permit borrowing adequate working capital from sources other than the City. The City as it is able will also supply additional assistance through City loans and grants for various public facilities. IT r- ,i,j,-pan-i.al ;;assistance from :,th@ .(,City; State of w Ca1i,_girnia,>Jeder4,,L government property tax incre- �, memtsr,T inp.est bome-,garncYbogds, F, -9r any other r avcai labl•e, sources,. - t, •, 4,2 •Estimated Agency Costs One of the primary purposes of the proposed Project is - to revitalize and upgrade a significant area of the City by eliminating the conditions of blight in the Project Area, such conditions evidenced by, among other things, incompatible land uses, deteriorated building types, and substandard public improvements. The Agency proposes to eliminate such conditions through rehabilitation, land acquisition, site occupant relocation, land disposition for private . yl development, and through installation of public improvements within and serving the Project Area. The fiscal impact of the amendment has been discussed as part of the Environmental documentation identified in Section 3.0 --essentially no adverse fiscal impacts are anticipated. Agency staff will continue to hold meetings with taxing agencies involved to insure that 19" no adverse fiscal impacts are created. It may be concluded generally that the Agency will have to look to sources in addition to tax increment revenues in order to finance the level of public improvements and other redevelopment activities contemplated. 4.3 Proposed Financing Method Preliminary review of the Agency's assumed program indicates that projected tax increment revenues and land disposition proceeds would be insufficient to meet estimated costs. Agency staff have identified additional funding sources which include surtax, CDBG and other sources. As available, gas tax funds from the State of California and the County of Orange will he used for the street system. Also, all or a portion of the parking may be installed through a parking authority or otherwise. Advances and loans for survey and planning and for the operating capital and for administration of this Project have been and are to be provided by the City until adequate funds are available or sufficiently assured to repay the loans and to permit borrowing adequate working capital from sources other than the City. The City as it is able will also supply additional assistance through City loans and grants for various public facilities. IT r- 2.9.E The 'prop'dsed 'Redevelopment Plan amehfteht- 84-1 does not 'Affect`til"e existing limits of* t_ "'i4icrement'which .rr> ,.may,'be= allid€Aed UICVTe' A§eh`CyT' The"Plan limfts the amount of tax increment dollars which may be allocated -to the Agency to a cumulative total of $432,noo,0oo. It also limits the principal amount of Agency bonded indebtedness which is to be repaid in whole or in part from tax increment funds to a total of $100,000,000 outstanding at any one time. 4.4 Tax Increment Limitations and Requirements In addition to the tax increment and bond limits "0 discussed above, there are several other statutory requirments relating to the Agency's use of tax increment funds. The Agency is cognizant of such requirements and intends to fully adhere to them to the extent they are applicable to the Agency and to the proposed Project (with the Added Area). A summary of these requirements is presented below. 4.4.1. Prior to paying all or part of the value of land for the cost of installation and con- struction of any publicly owned building, facility, structure or other improvement within or without the Project Area (with the Added Area), the Agency will request the City Council consent to such payment and to determine: a. That such building, facility, structure or improvement is of benefit to the Project Area (with the Added Area) or the immediate neighborhood; and b. That no other reasonable means of financing the building, facility, structure or improvement is available to the Agency. 4.4.2 Prior to committing to use tax increment funds to pay for all or part of the value of the land for, and the cost of instal- lation and construction of, a publicly owned building (other than parking facili- ties) the Agency will request the City Council to hold a public hearing and to make the above determinations. In con- nection with such public hearing a summary will be prepared to: a. Show the estimated amount of tax increment funds'• proposed to be used M 96- ;;-.. .M;a•� �; r:.,_ to pay for,,such lan64aand construction n"rr.ro y.;! ^.":,,. ,(including; interest payments); b Set forth' the facts supporting the City Council's determinations; and C. Set forth the redevelopment purposes for which such expenditure is being Tc,.. made. 4.4.3 The Agency will not, without the _prior consent of the City Council, develop a site for industrial or commmercial use so-, as to provide streets, sidewalks, utilities or other improvements which the owner or operator of the site would otherwise be obligated to provide. ! 4.4.4 Prior to entering into any agreement to sell or lease any property acquired in whole or in part with tax increment funds, the Agency will request the City Council to :.. approve such sale or lease after holding a public hearing. In connection with such public hearing the Agency shall make available a summary describing and specifying: a. The cost of the agreement to the Agency; b. The estimated value of the interest to be conveyed or leased determined at the highest uses permitted under the Redevelopment Plan; and C. The purchase price or the sum of the lease payments, and, if the sale 'rice or total rental amount is less than the fair market value of the interest to be conveyed or leased determined at the highest and best use consistent with the Redevelopment Plan, an explanation of the reasons •, for such difference. 4.4.5 Unless certain specified findings are made,, not less than 20 percent of each year's tax increment funds allocated to the Agency will be set aside in a special fund for the purposes of increasing and improving the City's supply of housing for persons of low and moderate income and very low income households. " 19 297 n°4.44.6: -,., Although. not statutorily mandated, the A9ency i wi:9l, upon the request of any taxing agency with territory within 'the Project Area which -can demonstrate it has suffered r:G a financial burden or deteriment caused by the Project, consider making a payment to such agency to alleviate such burden or detriment. Any such payment., however, would be subject to the availability of funds to make such payment, after meeting required obligations. b'5.0 29 PLAN AND METHOD OF RELOCATION 5.1 General Although the Agency does not anticipate that dislo- cation will be caused by the proposed amendment, relocation assistance will be provided consistent with the California Relocation Assistance Law (Government Code, Section 7260 et seq.), the State Guidelines adopted and promulgated pursuant thereto, Relocation Rules and Regulations adopted by the Agency, and the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan for the proposed project. The Agency will pay all relocation payments required by law. No persons or families of low and moderate income shall be displaced by the Revelopment Project unless and until there is a suitable housing unit available and ready for occupancy by such displaced person or family at rents comparable to those at the time of their displacement. Such housing units shall be suitable to the needs of such displaced persons or families and must be decent, safe, sanitary and otherwise standard dwelling. 5.2 Administrative Organization 5.2.1 Responsible Agency The Agency is responsible for providing relocation payments and assistance to individuals, families, businesses and in- stitutions to be displaced by the Agency from the project area. The Agency will meet its rehousing responsibilities through the use of its staff and consultants, supplemented by assistance from local realtors, social agencies and civic organizations. 20 298 Functl,'Ons's, , t 1. wg�i hng (` Ids :d. .�t 1 ���i.' a,�s,; * t;^a 7y Wo Thiol fi rFCy :,staff or consultants' c• ofc' "'? .ry- perform 'thefollowing functions with to relocation and displacement: will regard 21 -s� a) ?nterpret. the Agency's program to all site occupants to enlist their under- standing and support, and to answer' questions about the project and its I qC _,.. effect upon site occupants. T "M b) Determine the relocation needs and desires of all site occupants through i, personal interviews; keep them informed of their rights and responsi- bilities under the program and of the rehousing resources, special services L ,: and aids available to them; and C encourage visits to the relocation office for information and assistance. r c) Enlist the cooperation of real estate agents, home builders, property management firms, social agencies, civic groups and others in locating suitable relocation accommodations for displacees and to provide other Cr services essential for the successful ,. relocation of site occupants. �'. d) Assist each eligible displaced person to obtain and move to a comparable replacement dwelling. Locate, in- spect and evaluate, or stimulate the development of, housing facilities to meet the needs of all project resi- dents; and refer and otherwise assist site residents to e) Secure priority consideration for dis- placed persons eligible for and desiring publicly assisted housing, and any other housing to which displacees are first entitled, and otherwise expedite their placement. Assist prospective home buyers in obtaining appropriate mortgage financing and advise them of special FHA, VA and other aids available. 21 299 f),-._ ,Advise �opd,* assist bu;jgggs owners and - - t-enants in "understanding and taking P_ ` LL',.,,-advantage of � the owner. and tenant ^_"• participation opportunities provided within the project area. Assist each displaced business in obtaining and becoming established in a suitable re- placement location. r>r'i g) Make indicated referrals to com— munity, social welfare and other appropriate agencies, and work with ~nF these agencies on an individual basis n7 to help in the solution of specific problems affecting the relocation of individuals or groups of relocatees. h) Maintain liason services between businesses, site occupants and commercial property brokers, realty boards, Chamber of Commerce, the Small Business Administration, lending institutions and other appropriate resources for advice and assistance in affecting their satisfactory relocation. i) Assist site occupants in preparing claims for relocation payments and administer the program providing costs of moving, storage and/or direct loss of property; and, for _ those eligible therefor, provide payments in lieu of moving expenses and direct property loss, replacement housing payments and reimbursement of other related charges. j) Coordinate relocation activities with all other Agency operations. k) Maintain relocation records and prepare reports as required by the State of California. 1) Provide information on the availa- bility, prices and rentals of comparable sales and rental housing, and as to security deposits, closing costs, typical down payments, interest rates and terms for residential property in the area to those that may be displaced. 22 300 m} form al'1, persons whq,are �� expected .:„21 Mcx to, -be d 1 aced ,'=abbu� "the eviction '! ti palicties4 `fie 'lfi}rsuAd in carrying pro3ect �, , n) Provide services required to insure that the relocationprocess does not _ , result in different ” or separate treatment on account of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital status or other arbitrary circumstances. 5.3 Relationship with Site Occupants a° The Agency will inform site occupants about the Agency's plans and program. This will be done by personal interview and contracts, general mailings and distribution of information material, group and public meetings to provide information and answer questions. All of these efforts will be continued throughout the ;sa :.,. project operations to insure that each site occupant is fully informed as to the time schedules, the relocation program, opportunities for relocation housing, the relocation services and aids available to him. The unique needs of any non-profit local community institution displaced by the project will be carefully evaluated, and redevelopment assistance appropriate to these needs will be provided. 5.4 Assistance to Businesses Business site occupants will be personally interviewed to determine their relocation needs and preferences, provided general and special informational material, assisted in preparing relocation claims, helped in finding other suitable locations within or outside the project area, and referred to other groups or agencies for assistance in expediting their satisfactory relocation. As the situation dictates, the relocation staff will refer these site occupants to, and maintain liaison between the Small Business Administration, trade associations, Chamber of Commerce, lending institu- tions, real estate agencies, brokers and mutiple listing realty boards in order that they may be assisted on a non-discriminatory basis in obtaining suitable relocation premises, financial help and guidance in reestablishing their operations. 2p, 301 Ad -V �9€y erFvices of ' isistarice will, be. provided to all, hu�inesonCeCnS;,gScupying properties within.: the pro7.ect area,: iminedaa". y adjacent to the project area, an¢ any real property acquired when it becomes :e`xidppt that the business concern has suffered qy4 ._'Suq�tantial losses as a direct result of Agency qT" {activities. Services and assistance provided shall. .. include, but is not limited to: X sB i) Consultations concerning space needs and traffic patterns, taking into consideration the total number of employees; 2) Information explaining availability of space in desired areas, costs and square footage of comparable sites; 3) Information relative to property values, zoning ordinances and any other information that may assist the businessmen in making an informed decision relative to the relocation site. Businessmen will also be provided complete information concerning relocation benefits and procedures necessary to obtain payments pursuant to California State Law and the Redevelopment Plan. The local offices of the Small Business Adminis- tration will be informed on redevelopment project activities, as necessary, and requested to work with the Agency and commercial site occupants in soliciting their assistance. 5.5 Temporary Moves It may become necessary on occasion, as project activities proceed, to make temporary moves of residents, non-profit local community institutions or business concerns to permit timely and scheduled project activities. Moves of this nature shall be minimized to the extent possible and performed only when adequate resources for permanent relocation sites are not available. Staff and/or consultants shall make every effort to assist the site occupant in p,F,- obtaining permanent relocation resources prior to initiation of a temporary move and then only after it is determined that project activities will be seriously impeded if such move is not performed. No temporary move shall be made by the Agency unless such move is in conformance with State of California and Agency requirements. 24t 302 It is the Agency's objective that' 3i'i'''site 'residents be rehoused with a minimum of hard,Ship in ,acgom- modations which are decent, safe;;; sanitary ' anif suitable to their individual needs; ,located in areas'' not less, desirable than the project area in regard to " public utilities and public and commercial facilities; reasonably accessible to their places of employment; and priced within their financial means. To achieve these objectives, the Agency will establish relocation r' housing standards, including minimum physical, occupancy and environmental standards necessary to qualify a dwelling unit as an acceptable relocation resource. 5.7 Grievance Procedures Displacees will be informed by Agency staff of their right to appeal regarding relocation payment claims or other decisions made affecting their relocation. Such appeals will be made and determined in accord with the policies established by the Agency. 6.0 ANALYSIS OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAN The Preliminary Plan for the proposed San Juan Capistrano Central Redevelopment Project describes the boundaries of the proposed project area, contains general statements regarding land uses, layout of principal streets, population densities, building intensities and building standards proposed as the basis for the redevelopment of the area, indicates the proposed redevelopment conforms to the General Plan of the City, and describes generally the impact of the proposed project upon residents thereof and upon the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed Redevelopment Plan for the project area conforms with the standards and provisions of the Preliminary Plan. The project area boundaries remain the same. The Redevelopment Plan proposes the same land uses. The Redevelopment Plan includes all principal streets .indicated in the Preliminary Plan. Population densities and building intensities are in compliance with limits established' in the Preliminary Plan. Proposed building standards remain the same. - C 03 As set? fdrthR_in= fid-Preltipi-nary Plan,? �hq � ropoo��ed Rede- velop Plan -Mill 'ai<tairr the -purp,i a "Kedevel op- : ,ymgnt. Law` through:,F A. "'The elimination' of environmental deficiencies in - "'A ' cTuding among others, small and irregular lots, in- compatible land uses, obsolete, deteriorated and/or t.e. dilapidated building types, substandard and deteri- orated public improvements, faulty lot layout in qmy relation to size, shape, accessibility and circulation s�,• and usefulness to permit the return of the project are "o'tsa; land to uses related in a functional and economically 'soft•' feasible arrangement with maximum participation by owners and business tenants in the revitalization of their properties. B. The achievement of changes in under -productive land uses through planned and coordinated development and the protection and buffering or screening of commercial/industrial uses from residential uses 'or in- compatible uses wherever feasible. .C. The provision of land for public uses and facilities including, among others, civic, cultural and social uses, utilities and open space types of use such as streets, parking areas and other public grounds and space around public or private buildings and structures and improvements. D. The creation and expansion wherever feasible of employment opportunities for area residents, including employment of area residents in reconstruction and com- munity programs during plan implementation. E. Removal of impediments to land disposition and develop- ment through assembly of land into reasonably sized and shaped parcels served by improved public ' facilities. F. The achievement of an environment reflecting a high level of concern for architectural and urban design principles. The City of San Juan Capistrano has adopted a General Plan which includes all elements mandated by State Law. The Pre- liminary Plan and the proposed Redevelopment Plan conform to the General Plan and mandatory elements thereof. Impact of the proposed project -upon the residents and the surrounding neighborhood will be as set forth in the Preliminary Plan and as more fully described in Section 7.0 of this report. 304 7-0 NE1G1i60RH90D.<iM,9CI�j3 PORI._ RR 9 i�"1, 5t3' f -w The--4mpact of the San :Juan Capiastrano Central Redevelopment r*ojett U1 oro ' res`idenis of the 'Project Area and surrounding "nelOb'orhoods wi11, in general, be in the areas of relocation, ),straffic circulation, public facilities, environmental quality, property assessments and taxes, commercial retail/service activities, employment opportunities, economic development, and -r'residential development, and the physical and social quality of t'the neighborhood. Provision of circulation improvements may receive some traffic congestion presently in existence on city' streets. 7.1 Description of the Proposed Project Area and Surrounding Areas src;; c' A description of the proposed Project Area is included '=•i in Section 3.0. The areas surrounding the proposed Project Area are, for the most part, undeveloped. 7.2 Relocation In any redevelopment project, Project Area occupants may be relocated during project implementation. 7.2.1 Number of Dwemo1lin Units Expected to be estroyed or eved It is anticipated that there will be no existing units destroyed or removed within the Added Area. 7.2.2 Number of Persons Expected to be Displaced The Agency does not anticipate to displace any persons in the Added Area. In the event of displacement, no person will be displaced until there is a standard housing unit available within his financial means in a reasonably convenient location. The Redevelopment Project will include pro- vision for the relocation of businesses and institutional uses in the case it is contemplated. The same relocation benefits will be provided for these uses; preference will be given to property owners and business tenants to reenter the Project Area. •err 27 7.2.5 Projected Means of Financin Proposed 15we11'in—units for onstruction or Rehabilitation Financing may be provided from one or more of the following: Community Development Block . Grant funds, tax increment funds, S.B. 99 -Mortgage Revenue financing, in clusionary zoning, and other available sources and techniques. 7.2.6 Projected Timetable for Meeting Plans r. Regardless of the relocation evolving, it is apparent that the limitations described above will dictate a phased acquisition program involving no large scale residen- tial or commercial displacement in any single year. 7.3 Traffic Circulation Existing and proposed traffic volumes in the project area and the surrounding areas have been based upon the Circulation Element of the General Plan, the County's Master Plan for Highways, and various de- tailed Environmental Impact Reports. These studies indicate that the project can potentially have good access but that a number of roadway improvements are required in order for appropriate redevelop- ment/revitalization to occur. a 7.2.3 Gerfel4ai LocaEinn of Moos"_ get,%!A.e. :lReha¢i 1 i - ed or Wstrittgd " �, •: �_.7 is -L� ("ti L, �.. ^, If units a -re eliminate *10jn l;bvoAdded Area, replacement of residential units:: -may Y; be located inside or outside the—Praject Area. c 7.2.4 Number of Dwelling Units Planned for Gon- r,:`" struction or ehabi stat on,Uther than ep acemen ousing c Residents will be relocated into standard housing units in the event of residential displacement. It is anticipated that at least 274 new dwelling units will be con- „ strutted, of which at least 55 units may be reserved for families of low or moderate income by a variety of methods. 7.2.5 Projected Means of Financin Proposed 15we11'in—units for onstruction or Rehabilitation Financing may be provided from one or more of the following: Community Development Block . Grant funds, tax increment funds, S.B. 99 -Mortgage Revenue financing, in clusionary zoning, and other available sources and techniques. 7.2.6 Projected Timetable for Meeting Plans r. Regardless of the relocation evolving, it is apparent that the limitations described above will dictate a phased acquisition program involving no large scale residen- tial or commercial displacement in any single year. 7.3 Traffic Circulation Existing and proposed traffic volumes in the project area and the surrounding areas have been based upon the Circulation Element of the General Plan, the County's Master Plan for Highways, and various de- tailed Environmental Impact Reports. These studies indicate that the project can potentially have good access but that a number of roadway improvements are required in order for appropriate redevelop- ment/revitalization to occur. a 306 The 'primary objective of the planned roadway improve- ments is -to relieve'',cQngestion within the commercial care:--by�r' ehi.cles 'attempting, to,„make connection with bol. interchange between Ortega- Highway and I-5. All planned roadway improvements identified in :the Pre- liminary Redevelopment Plan are based upon this basic objective. Traffic and Circulation impacts are described in 'the various EIR's identified in Section 3.0. 7.4 Public Services and Utilities; Quality of Education 1 The impact of the proposed project on public facilities was also considered in the above required EIR's. The following areas are addressed in the EIR: Police Telephone Fire Schools Water Health Care Sewage Energy Conservation Electricity Fiscal Impacts Gas Social Issues Solid Waste 7.5 Property Assessments and Taxes In general, the taxable valuations of property within the Project Area and adjoining the Project Area should increase as construction or reconstruction of public and other development improvements occurs. The Assessor may increase property valuations at the maximum rate of two percent per year allowed under Proposition 13, regardless of Project -related actions. In cases where property changes hands, the Assessor will likely assess the property at the newly recorded market value. Additionally, the Assessor will reassess the added value to property and improvements due to any new development or rehabilitation which occurs. The only other matters potentially affecting property taxes in the Project Area and surrounding areas would be the possibility of additional levies due to special assessment districts. There are no proposals for such districts at this time although options for such may be considered at a later date. A parcel evaluation would be undertaken at a later date should it be desired to create one or more special assessment district(s) within the Project Area. It should also be noted that special assessment districts for various legally permitted purposesmay be established by the City irrespective of whether a redevelopment project is adopted. 29 r 11.0 REPORT OF THE ORANGE COUNTY FISCAL OFFICER (Refer to Exhibit 4) (To be added if and when received) 12.0 REPORT OF FISCAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (Refer to Exhibit 5) (To be added if and when received) 13.0 ANALYSIS OF THE REPORT OF THE COUNTY FISCAL OFFICER, INCLUDING A SUMMARY OF CONSULTATIONS WITH EACH TATM (Refer to Exhibit 6) (To be added prior to the public hearing on the proposed Redevelopment Plan) 307 8.%, -REPORT AND "'RECOMMENDATIONS 'OF .JHE PLANNING COMMISSION ON (Refer to Exhibit 1) (To be added prior to the public hearing of the proposed Redevelopment Plan) ;9.0 A SUMMARY OF MEETINGS AND COMMUNICATIONS WITH PROJECT AREA RESIDENTS PRUPOSED AND COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS CENTRAL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CONCERNING 7Rr n� ;n (Refer to Exhibit 2) -r (To be added prior to the public hearing of the proposed Redevelopment Plan) n '10.0 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT • fec� (Refer to Exhibit 3) (To be added prior to the public hearing of the proposed Redevelopment Plan) 11.0 REPORT OF THE ORANGE COUNTY FISCAL OFFICER (Refer to Exhibit 4) (To be added if and when received) 12.0 REPORT OF FISCAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (Refer to Exhibit 5) (To be added if and when received) 13.0 ANALYSIS OF THE REPORT OF THE COUNTY FISCAL OFFICER, INCLUDING A SUMMARY OF CONSULTATIONS WITH EACH TATM (Refer to Exhibit 6) (To be added prior to the public hearing on the proposed Redevelopment Plan) CENTRAL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT ADDED AREA. AREA 1: SAS/WlLLlAMS/ENDEVC0)% ' Z4�"MEL CROW/ kAH E 6.5 ARtA 3: AROSAILYON 9-: CRY-54CLU.NDARY 47 ADDED AREA CENTRAL REVELOPMENT PROJWT AMA L -7 7 COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO �vv A REQUIRED PUBLIC _Celt CAPITAL IMFqQVEMENTS -09 i c\ AREA 1: 1. RANCHO VIEJO ROAD 2. TRABUCO CREEK BRIDGE 49' �`c` wy:`::. '` 1 .. .. • ��. J PERO SEARA ROAD » !�' AY •\ EA aA'/ORTEGA�ONNECTION SAN JUAN CREEK ROAD ••\ LA NOVIA 6. VALLE ROAD A. jcj . 9. VALLE ROAD EXTENSION COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO EXHIBIT B