Resolution Number 68-5-6-2� e
i
RESOLUTION NO. 68-5-6-2
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF
SECTION 2156 STREET PROGRESS AND NEEDS REPORT
AND ORDERING SAME TO BE FILED WITH THE STATE
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Juan Capistrano is
in receipt of the Section 2156 Street Progress and Needs Report cover-
ing the needs of the City of San Juan Capistrano, County of Orange,
State of California as prepared by its City Engineer, Jack Y. Kubota; and
WHEREAS, the City Council further finds that the local adopted
Master Plan of Streets and Highways has been followed in preparing the
road systems for this Section 2156 study and report; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered and reviewed said report
and finds that it accurately reflects the street needs of the City; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council that said report
be filed forthwith with the State Division of. Highways.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council that it
acknowledge receipt of and accept the Section 2156 Street Progress
and Needs Report to which reference has been made.
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Engineer be and he is
hereby authorized and directed to file said report at once with the
State Division of Highways of the State of California.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by me this 7th
day of May, 1968.
ATTEST
ilt�l ; obi
City' -(Clerk of the City./o
San Juan Capistrano
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY`OF ORANGE )
CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO )
�ZP
�Ln-ia�t;
mayor or the city o
San Juan Capistrano
I, ERNEST A. THOMPSON, City Clerk of the City of San Juan
Capistrano, California, hereby certify that the foregoing is a true
and correct copy of a Resolution of the City Council of said City
numbered 68-5-6-2, adopted by the City Council on the 7th day of May,
1968 and was so passed and adopted by the following stated vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: DURNFORD, BATHGATE, OLIVARES, FORSTER
and CHERMAK
NOES: COUNCILMEN: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: NONE v ,
ityClerk