Resolution Number 77-1-5-231
RESOLUTION NO. 77-1-5-2
RESIDENTIAL PROJECT RATING SCALE
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING
A PROJECT RATING SCALE FOR EVALUATION OF
RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS SUBJECT TO THE CITY'S
GROWTH MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
WHEREAS, the City Council, on December 15, 1976,
adopted Ordinance No. 314, instituting a residential growth
management system in the City; and,
WHEREAS, Section 5 of Ordinance No. 314 requires
that the City Council passa Resolution adopting a Project
Rating Scale (PRS) for evaluation of residential projects
affected by the Ordinance; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the criteria
and point distribution in the draft PRS, set forth herein as
Exhibit 1; and,
WHEREAS, the Council finds that the proposed criteria
and point distribution are consistent with the purpose and
intent of Ordinance No. 314 and the goals and policies of the
General Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council
hereby adopts Exhibit 1 as the Project Rating Scale required
by Subsection 5B of Ordinance No. 314.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of
January , 1977, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Councilmen Sweeney, McDowell, Friess,
Heckscher, and Mayor Nash
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
DOUGLAS B. GASH, MAYOR
CITY CLE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO )
I, MARY ANN HANOVER, City Clerk of the City of San Juan
Capistrano, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a
true and correct copy of Resolution No. 77-1-5-2 adopted by the
City Council of the City of San Juan Capistrano, California, at a
regular meeting thereof held on the 5th day of January , 1977.
(SEAL)
MARY ANNHANOVER,'C' Y CLERK
-1-
z
w
F
H
L,.
U
6
cz
w
z
LU
33
EXHIBIT I - PROJECT RATING SCALE
RATTNG CRITERIA POINTS
Greater than 1-1.5 .5-1 Less than
i
1.5 mi. mi. mi. .5 mi.
1. Proximity of nearest developed public
park or other public recreation facility
(e.g., jr. high or high school)* 0 1 3 S
Z. Proximity of nearest elementary school* 0 I 1 3 5
3. Project site located in attendance area IAll 3 levels 2of s" 1 of 3 No levels
served by school designated as over- overcrowded levels levels overcrowded
crowded (elementary, jr. high, or high over- over -
school) crowded crowded
0 1 3 5
4. Project requires extension of commuter
or arterial road for access
S. Project provides dual access to
development
6. Variances requested to accommodate
project
7. General Plan Amendment required to
accommodate project
S. Consumption of land designated for
Resource Conservation $ Production
in the General Plan (% of site area)
9. Landform alteration - sensitivity of
grading concepts; ridgeline preser-
vation
10. Provision for open area - public
and private
11. Provision of private recreation
facilities
12. Reduction of SOo or more below
maximum General Plan density
13. Overall quality of design
(innovation, architectural quality,.
amenity, energy saving measures,
etc.)
14. Unusual public benefit from project**
TOTAL
Yes No
0 S
No Yes
0 5
Yes No
0 S
Yes No
-5 +5
1000 —) 0%
0 � 10
Relatively heavy --j Min. grading -
grading - unnecessary preservation
landform alteration of major
landforms
0 1, 10
Min. provision of Maximum provision
open area of open area
consistent with
G.P. designation
0 10
No Yes
0 -> 10
No Yes
0 10
0 15
0 10
Provision of low or moderate income
o housing 0-15
m
100
* Measured from nearest boundary of most distant lot (or dwelling unit if there are
no individual lots) in the project to the nearest boundary of the park or school
site..
** Examples include: correction of unsafe condition, mitigation of existing adverse
environmental or aesthetic condition, preservation of historic structures or site,
etc.
-2-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO )
and says:
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
MARY ANN HANOVER, being first duly sworn, deposes
That she is the duly appointed and qualified City
Clerk of the City of San Juan Capistrano;
That in compliance with State laws of the State of
California and in further compliance with City Resolution
No.76-12-15-10 and on the 7th day of January ,
197 7 , she caused to be posted:
being:
RESOLUTION NO. 77-1-5-2
RESIDENTIAL PROJECT RATING SCALE
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA,
ADOPTING.A PROJECT RATING SCALE FOR
EVALUATION OF RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS SUB-
JECT TO THE CITY'S GROWTH MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM
35
in three (3) public places in the City of San Juan Capistrano,
to wit:
The Administration Building;
The Post Office;
The Orange County Public Library.
J
MARY ANNF OVER, City Clerk
San Juan pistrano, California