Resolution Number 80-1-23-115'7
RESOLUTION NO. 80-1-23-1
GROWTH MANAGEMENT 79-4 (CADILLAC/FAIRVIEW)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA, ASSIGNING
A GROWTH MANAGEMENT POINT RATING TO GROWTH
MANAGEMENT 79-4
WHEREAS, the applicant, Cadillac Fairview Homes West,
500 Newport Center Drive, Suite 815, Newport Beach, California,
has submitted a residential concept plan for the future development
of 77 units on 12.7+ acres and is identified as Assessor's Parcel
No. 668-021-01; and,
WHEREAS, the City's Environmental Review Board has
determined that the project will have a significant impact on the
environment and has caused an Environmental Impact Report to be
prepared.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council, after holding a duly
noticed public hearing, hereby finds and determines that a growth
management point rating of 57 as distributed in Attachment "A" be
assigned to Growth Management 79-4 (Cadillac/Fairview).
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 23rd day of
January , 1980 , by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Councilmen Hausdorfer, Schwartze, Thorpe,
Buchheim and Mayor Friess
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
NN TH E. FRIESS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLER,I
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO )
I, MARY ANN HANOVER, City Clerk of the City of San Juan
Capistrano, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a
true and correct copy of Resolution No. 80-1-23-1 , adopted by
the City Council of the City of San Juan Capistrano, California,
at a regular meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of
January , 1980 .
(SEAL)
MARY ANN 7 OVER, CITY CLERK
-1-
158
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss
CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO )
and says:
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
MARY ANN HANOVER, being first duly sworn, deposes
That she is the duly appointed and qualified City
Clerk of the City of San Juan Capistrano;
That in compliance with State laws of the State of
California and in further compliance with City Resolution
No. 79-2-21-7 and on the 29th day of January , 1980 ,
she caused to be posted:
RESOLUTION NO. 80-1-23-1
being: GROWTH MANAGEMENT 79-4 (CADILLAC/FAIRVIEW)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA, ASSIGNING A GROWTH
MANAGEMENT POINT RATING TO GROWTH MANAGEMENT 79-4
in three (3) public places in the City of San Juan Capistrano,
to wit:
The Administration Building;
The San Juan Hot Springs Dance Hall;
The Orange County Public Library.
MARY AND OVER, City C rk G
San Jua Capistrano, California
-2-
L\III61T 1 - PROJLCT RATING SCALE
159
KI
• 6leasumd from nearest boundary of most distant lot (or dwelling unit it there are
no individual lots) in the project to the nearest boundary of the park or school
site -
Examples include: correction of unsafe condition, mitigation of existing adverse
environmental or aesthetic condition, preservation pfhistri cls rctures or site,
etc. 2 H^-7I-'1rY/'k1/���f l ,
RATING CRITGIiIA
POINTS
.
iGreater than
1-1.5
.5-1
Less Than
1.5 mi.
mi.
mi.
.5 mi.
1.
Proximity of nearest developed public
park or other public recreation facility)
�+
(e.g., jr. high or high school)*
0
1
3
S.
2.
Proximity of nearest elementary school*
0
1
3
S
3.
Project site located in attendance area
All 3 levels 2of 3
1 of 3
No levels
served by school designated as over-
!overcrowded levels
levels
overcrowded
crowded (elementary, jr. high, or high
over-
over -
school)
crowded
crowded
0 1
3
5
b
w
4.
Project requires extension of commuter
Yes
,
No
or arterial road for access
0
S
z
S.
Project provides dual access to
No
Yes
c
V
development
0
5
a
6.
Variances requested to accommodate
Yes
- No
f=
project
0
5
7.
General Plan Amendment required to
Yes
No
accommodate project
-5
+5
S.
Consumption of land designated for
1000
03
Resource Conservation $ Production
in the General Plan (% of site area)
0
> 10
9.
Landform alteration - sensitivity of
Relatively heavy
? Min. grading -
grading concepts; ridgeline preser-
grading - unnecessary
preservation
vation
landformalteration
of major
landforms
0
? 10
10.
Provision for open area - public
i
!titin. provision of Maximum provision
and private
open area
of open area
I
consistent with
-
G.P. designation
0
10
a
at
11.
Provision of private recreation
No
Yes
facilities
0
j 10 '
U
U
_
12.
Reduction of SO"a or more below
No
Yes
10
h
V
maximum General Plan density
0
m
13.
overall quality of design
(innovation, architectural quality,.
i
amenity, energy saving measures,
�l
etc-)
0
5
14.
Unusual public benefit from project**-
0
10
TOTAL I
0
100
W
Provision of low or moderate income
=
housing
m
.I
�
• 6leasumd from nearest boundary of most distant lot (or dwelling unit it there are
no individual lots) in the project to the nearest boundary of the park or school
site -
Examples include: correction of unsafe condition, mitigation of existing adverse
environmental or aesthetic condition, preservation pfhistri cls rctures or site,
etc. 2 H^-7I-'1rY/'k1/���f l ,