Resolution Number 84-7-17-550 -RE450 -
RESOLUTION
SOLUTION NO. 84-7-17-5
RESIDENTIAL CONCEPT PLANS - GROWTH MANAGEMENT
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING RESIDENTIAL
CONCEPT PLANS FOR BRINDERSON/WILLIAM LYON COMPANY
WHEREAS, the applicant, Brinderson/William Lyon
Company, has submitted Residential Concept Plans for a 274 -unit
multi -family complex in accordance with Chapter 9-7 of the
Municipal Code (Residential Growth Management); and,
WHEREAS, the City's Environmental Review Board has
determined that the proposed project will have a significant
effect on the environment, has required the preparation of an
Environmental Impact Report, which report has been certified as
final by the City Council, and has otherwise carried out all
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the
concept plan, has recommended adoption of draft growth management
point rating for the concept plan, and has forwarded said plan
and point rating to the City Council recommending approval
subject to conditions; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council, after holding a duly noticed
public hearing, hereby finds and determines as follows:
1. The growth management point rating of 62 points is
accurate and appropriate.
2. The proposed concept plan, as conditioned, is
consistent with the 1.6 (High Density Residential)
General Plan land use designation and is otherwise
consistent with all other Elements of the General
Plan as amended by General Plan Amendment 84-1,
Item B.
The proposed concept plan, as conditioned, is
consistent with the zoning on the property and
with all requirements of Title 9 of the Municipal
Code (Land Use).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a growth
management point rating of 62 points is hereby adopted for the
subject residential concept plan per Chapter 9-7 of the Municipal
Code, said point rating being detailed on attached Exhibit I.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council does
hereby approve Residential Concept Plan Growth Management 84-1,
subject to the following conditions:
-1-
45'r
July
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
1. Pursuant to Section 9-7.109 of the Municipal Code,
Residential Concept Plan approval does not
constitute final approval of a project. All
further requirements of Title 9 of the Municipal
Code must be satisfied for the project to proceed.
2. Proof of geological and soils stability of all
proposed grading and development within the
subject parcels shall be submitted to the
satisfaction of the City prior to any tentative
tract map approval.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of
1984 1 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Councilmen Friess, Bland, Buchheim,
and Mayor Hausdorfer
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilman Schw
t/
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO )
I, MARY ANN HANOVER, City Clerk of the City of San Juan
Capistrano, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a
true and correct copy of Resolution No. 84-7-17-5 , adopted by
the City Council of the City of San Juan Capistrano, California,
at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th day of
July 1 1984 .
(SEAL) -
MARY ANN HA R, CITY CLERK
L'
-2-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO )
and says:
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
MARY ANN HANOVER, being first duly sworn, deposes
452
That she is the duly appointed and qualified City Clerk
of the City of San Juan Capistrano;
That in compliance with State laws of the State of
California and in further compliance with City Resolution
No. 83-12-20-3 and on the 20th day of July 1984 ,
she caused to be posted:
RESOLUTION NO. 84-7-17-5
being: RESIDENTIAL
- GROWTH MANAGEMENT
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING RESIDENTIAL
CONCEPT PLANS FOR BRINDERSON/WILLIAM LYON COMPANY
in three (3) public places in the City of San Juan Capistrano,
to wit: City Hall; Old Fire Station Recreation Complex; Orange
County Public Library.
CHECK LIST
ORD. 1y0._......- RES. NO- _...... ._
�/ Mayor has signed
......If. Clerk has signed
..__1l City Seal stamped
_...Y-.. All blanks typed i��¢x
"Absent" ............................._.....--........._.
"Noes" .. ----------- --- ---..................---
......._.... Typed in Official Record Book
...... Posted to Classified Ca d
............. Copies sent to�Qiee'5 7 �-d�X
rlt---------------- ------------
Legal Publication ordered to be published
(date) ------------- ._--------- ----- --- ------------.....
No. Affidavits .....-------_--------------.-.. ......
No. Printed copies required ------------ /_......_--
Remarks __--
..._----........`.........................................................---- -
...................................................................I...--
-3-
MARY ANN OVER, CITY -CLERK
San Jua Capistrano, California
V
1. Proximity of nearest developed public I
ylo
I c.
• park or other public recreation facility
No
?
(e.g., jr. high or high school)' 0
1
Yes
S
S
2. Prozirity of nearest elementary school* OO
1
3
5
C
S. Project site located in attendance area iAll 3 Ievels � 2of S
1 of 3
\0 levels
) 10
served by schoul desicnated as over- overcrowded levels
levels
overcrowded
crowded (elementary, jr. high, or high over-
aver -
landform alteration
school) - crowded
crowded
landforrs
0 1
3
5
4. Project requires extension of co -.cuter
or arterial road for access
s. Project provides dual access to
development
6. variancos requested to accommodate
project
7. General Plan Amendment required to
accommodate project
S. Consumption of land designated for
Resource Conservation E Production
in the General Plan C. of site area)
9. Landform alteration - sensitivity of
grading concepts; ridgeline preser-
vation
1o. Provision for open area - public
and private
w 11. Provision of private recreation
F facilities
C -
U '
3' 12. Reduction of SO% or rare below
maximum General Plan density
z
13. Overall quality of design
(innovation, architectural quality,.
amenity, energy saving measures,
etc-)
14, jlnusual public benefit from projee
TOTAL
Provision of low or moderate income
housing
Yrs
0
ylo
I c.
No
O
dye\s
Yes
o
S
0
s
Yes 8
No
.s
8
100% OR
+I 0
) 10
/a
Relatively heavy
Min. grading-
rading-grading
grading- unnecessary
preservation
landform alteration
of major
landforrs
r�
0
10
! Min. provision of Maximum provision
open area of open area
consistent with .
G.P. designation
0 S 10
No .j Yes
0 y 10
Yes
10 1 ==
o s —
0 T 10
0 100
• measured from nearest boundary of most distant lot (or duelling unit if there are c
no individual lots) in the project to the nearest boundary of the park or school
site-
•• Czamples include: correction of unsafe condition, mitigation of -existing adverse
envitu=untal or aesthetic condition, preservation of historic structures or site,