Loading...
Resolution Number 86-9-16-3RESOLUTION NO. 86-9-16-3 DENYING ZONE VARIANCE 86-9 (BRAITHWAITE A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA, DENYING ZONE VARIANCE 86-9, A REQUEST TO ALLOW A PREVIOUSLY CONSTRUCTED PATIO COVER TO ENCROACH 10 FEET INTO THE 10 -FOOT MINIMUM SIDE -YARD SETBACK LOCATED AT 33801 VALLE ROAD, SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CA 92675 (BRAITHWAITE) 383 WHEREAS, the applicants, Dr. and Mrs. George Braithwaite, 33801 Valle Road, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675, have submitted an application for a zone variance to allow encroachment of the side - yard setback for a previously constructed open patio cover that was built without a building permit located in the ES (Small Estate) District; and, WHEREAS, the City's Environmental Review Board has determined that the variance application is categorically exempt from environmental review requirements; and, WHEREAS, a public hearing has been duly advertised in the Capistrano Valley News and held to receive and consider public testimony on the application; and, WHEREAS, after conducting the public hearing, the Zoning Administrator denied the applicant's request; and, WHEREAS, the applicant has appealed the decision of the Zoning Administrator to the City Council; and, WHEREAS, a public hearing has been duly advertised in the Capistrano Valley News and held to receive and consider public T estimony on the application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby finds and determines as follows: a. There are no special circumstances applicable to the property which do not apply generally to other properties in the neighborhood in that the terrain is hilly in nature and the lot maintains a rectangular shape which is not unique to this area. b. The variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification in that no unusual characteristics justify this variance. no 3 �� C. The granting of the variance will contribute to a property development which will be materially 1 detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property improvements in the vicinity in that visual impact, though minimal, is borne by the neighbor directly adjacent to the subject property. d. The granting of the variance is not consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan. The construction of this patio cover is not consistent with the desire to maintain a minimal side -yard setback from the property line to principal structure. e. The granting of the variance, as proposed, would be in conflict with provisions of the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 5, Section 504A, Table 5A, which states that structures are not permitted less than 3 feet from the property line unless protected with one-hour construction, thus requiring a solid wall with no openings to be installed. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that based upon the preceding findings, the City Council does hereby deny Zone Variance 86-9. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 16th day of September 1986 KENNETH E. FRIESS, YOR ATTEST: CITY CLE -2- STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO ) I, MARY ANN HANOVER, City Clerk of the City of San Juan Capistrano, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. 86-9-16-3 adopted by the City Council of the City of San Juan Capistrano, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 16th day of September , 1986, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen Schwartze, Bland, Buchheim, Hausdorfer, and Mayor Friess NOES: None ABSENT: None ( SEAL) �� CL MAR OVER, CIT -,-t- CLERK -3-