Loading...
Resolution Number 91-3-5-4RESOLUTION NO. 91-3-5-4 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 90-2 AND DENYING REZONE 89-5, SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN 90-1, GROWTH MANAGEMENT 89-1, AND RIDGELINE EXCEPTION 90-1 (SAN JUAN VILLAS - CONCORDE DEVELOPMENT) WHEREAS, the applicant, Concorde Development, 19752 MacArthur Boulevard, Suite 240, Irvine, California, has submitted an application for a rezone, specific development plan, growth management (residential concept plan) and a ridgeline exception to allow for the construction of eighty-three (83) single family parcels on a 99 -acre site located at the northerly terminus of Camino Las Ramblas; and, WHEREAS, the site is characterized by steep terrain with a series of canyons and ridges, two prominent knolls and a General Plan -designated ridgeline, as described in the Planning Commission Agenda Item dated September 11, 1990 and City Council Agenda Item dated October 16, 1990, and thereby falls under the jurisdiction of the Hillside Management District regulations as established in Municipal Code Section 9-3.505; and, WHEREAS, the City's Environmental Review Board has determined that the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment and accordingly has caused an Environmental Impact Report to be prepared. This Environmental Impact Report consists of Final Environmental Impact Report 90-02 dated August 1990, the City Council and Planning Commission agenda items, minutes and resolutions, and the letter from Willdan Associates dated October 10, 1990. Said Environmental Impact Report has been found to be consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, as amended, and the City of San Juan Capistrano Environmental Guidelines. Also, said Environmental Impact Report has noted that the proposed project will result in unavoidable significant adverse environmental impacts in the areas of landform alteration and aesthetics if implemented, thereby requiring the City to adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations should the proposed project be approved; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on September 11, 1990 regarding the proposed project. Upon considering the staff report, applicant's presentation and public testimony, the Commission recommended City Council certification of Environmental Impact Report 90-02 and City Council denial of Rezone 89-05, Specific Development Plan 90-01, Growth Management 89-01 and Ridgeline Exception 90-01, pursuant to Planning Commission Resolution 90-9-11-2; and, WHEREAS, public hearings on October 16, 1990, November 20, 1990 and March 5, 1991 before the City Council have been duly noticed and held to receive public testimony on the application; and, -1- WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds and determines that: 1. the proposed project is not consistent with the policies of the General Plan as required by Government State Code Section 65850 in that: a) it will not preserve the integrity of the hillside character by removing a series of ridges and canyons, including two prominent knolls (Open Space/Conservation Element, page 45) b) it does not promote the conservation of the natural environment by proposing a massive grading program which will significantly alter the existing character of the site (Community Design Element, page 153); c) it does not portray a sensitive treatment of the natural topography by attempting to design iorizontat site concept for a site that is characterized by natur vertical elements and steep slopes (Community Design Element, page 153); d) it does not preserve natural topographical features by eliminating a series of successive ridges and canyons including two prominent knolls (Community Design Element, page 155); e) it does not maximize views and open space by altering a significant portion of existing natural hillside as viewed from the adjacent residential neighborhood and eliminating a majority of the existing natural open space as currently viewed from Camino Las Ramblas (Community Design Element, page 155); f) it does not propose sensitive locations of streets to the natural topography because it includes a double loaded (residential) street which is proposed to be parallel to Camino Las Ramblas (as an horizontal element) on a site which is strongly characterized by existing natural vertical elements - successive ridges and canyons (Community Design Element, page 155); and, 2. The proposed project is not consistent with the objectives of the Municipal Code Hillside Management District (Section 9-3.505 (g) et. seq.) in that: a) the integrity of the existing hilly terrain will not be preserved and the views both of and from the hills will not be respected by the alteration of the majority of the site as it is viewed from the adjacent residential neighborhood and Camino Las Ramblas; b) natural topographic features such as the two existing prominent knolls will be eliminated; -2- 015 c) the proposed project will significantly and irreversibly alter the existing character of the site, in that it will introduce a horizontal design approach as opposed to respecting the existing topography; d) major natural skylines such as the two prominent knolls will not be retained and abrupt changes in grade will occur allowing structures and manufactured slopes to interrupt and block the view of the General Plan -designated ridgeline from portions of Camino Las Ramblas; e) major natural topographic features, such as canyons, drainage swales, steep slopes, and view corridors will not be retained because the proposed design requires elimination of the two prominent knolls as well as a series of vertical ridges and canyons; f) prominent landmark features, such as the natural prominent knolls will not be preserved and/or enhanced; g) innovative street designs and improvements which serve to minimize grading alterations and harmonize with the natural contours and character of the hillside have not been employed; and, 3. The proposed project does not provide environmental and/or community "benefits", as required by California Quality Act Guidelines (as amended) Section 15093, which will override the identified unavoidable significant impacts associated with implementation of the proposed project and, therefore, a Statement of Overriding Considerations is not justified; 4. The project does not meet the design standards of Municipal Code Section 9-3.423.5 (cXi) and (ii) due to the elimination of the two prominent knolls on the project site; 5. The ridgeline exception request cannot be approved due to the encroachment of structures into the skyline as viewed from Camino Las Ramblas, as depicted in figure 11 of the EIR; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed alternatives to the project and finds that Exhibit A of this resolution, in addition to being consistent with the applicable General Plan policies and zoning regulations, is an appropriate design approach for development of the property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council does hereby certify Final Environmental Impact Report 90-02, which consists of the Final Environmental Impact Report dated August 1990, the City Council and Planning Commission agenda items, minutes and resolutions, and the letter from Willdan Associates dated October 10, 1990. -3- 016 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that based upon the findings above, the City Council does hereby deny Rezone 89-05, Specific Development Plan 90-01, Growth Management 89-01 and Ridgeline Exception 90-01. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 5th day of March 1991. KENNETH E. FRIESS, MAYOR ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO ) 1, CHERYL JOHNSON, City Clerk of the City of San Juan Capistrano, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. 91-3-5-4 adopted by the City Council of the City of San Juan Capistrano, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the Sth day of March , 1991, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen Jones, Hausdorfer, Buchheim, Vasquez and Mayor Friess NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None (SEAL) XCy�. CHERYL J , CITY CLER ST EXHBff A CUL -OE -SAC COMMATION G Legend DEg "AlrEDADDEIYE ��� p0 Fi. inOr OEgD1U�7E IIIDDEll1E