Loading...
Resolution Number 91-10-1-6r27 RESOLUTION NO. 91-10-1-6 UPHOLDING APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF HILLSIDE MANAGEMENT 91-5, FOR LOTS 36 AND 37, TRACT 11753 HUNT CLUB EMERY) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF HILLSIDE MANAGEMENT 91-5, A PROPOSED GRADING PLAN FOR LOTS 36 AND 37 OF THE HUNT CLUB II SUBDIVISION, TRACT 11753 (EMERY) WHEREAS, the applicants, William and Jane Emery and Theodore and Margaret Heston, have submitted a grading permit application to the City of San Juan Capistrano and the City did determine that the project was subject to compliance with Section 9-3.505, Hillside Management of the Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, Section 9-3.505(f) of the Municipal Code grants the Planning Commission authority to take final action on Hillside Management applications; and, WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Board considered this project at their July 23 and July 26 meetings and issued a mitigated negative declaration and forwarded this project to the Planning Commission for review and action; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered this project with respect to the objectives established by Section 9-3.505 of the Land Use Code, determined that the project did not comply with the City's Hillside Management objectives, and denied this project based on findings contained in Planning Commission Resolution 91-8-13-6; and, WHEREAS, the applicants, William and Jane Emery and Ted and Margaret Heston, have filed an appeal of the Planning Commission's action to deny the project contending that the project complies with the objectives of the Hillside Management District; and, WHEREAS, Section 9-2.314 of the Land Use Code authorizes the City Council to hear and decide all appeals of Planning Commission actions including the subject application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of San Juan Capistrano does hereby make the following findings: 1. The project is consistent with the policies and objectives of the San Juan Capistrano General Plan as embodied in the purpose and intent of Section 9-3.505, Hillside Management of the Land Use Code; and, 2. The project complies with the standards and objectives established by Section 9-3.505(g) of the Land Use Code. 3. The proposed grading is substantially limited to areas of existing artificial buttress fill slope. -1- iwn28MM 4. The proposed grading will create pads which comprise a smaller proportion of pad size compared to lot size than other lots in Tract 11753. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that: 1. The City Council of the City of San Juan Capistrano does hereby uphold the appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of Hillside Management 91-5, Emery based on the findings contained herein; and, 2. The City Council of the City of San Juan Capistrano does hereby grant an exception to the Municipal Code Section 9-4.112(2) to allow an approximate 50 foot high one (1) horizontal to one vertical fill slope on Lot 37, based on the findings contained herein. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this of October , 1991. ATTEST - VIA 1st KENNETH E. FRIESS, MAYOR -2- day STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO ) 1, CHERYL JOHNSON, City Clerk of the City of San Juan Capistrano, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. 91-10-1-6 adopted by the City Council of the City of San Juan Capistrano, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 1st day of October , 1991, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen Jones, Hausdorfer, Buchheim, Vasquez and Mayor Friess NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None (SEAL) C//�(LF�t c CHERYL JUWNSON, CITY CLERK CHECK LIST ORD. NO. •Mayor has signed Clerk has signed City Seal stamped All blanks typed in "Absent" "Noes" ,&— "Abstain" —a` RES. NO.-/0-/—(� Copies sent to post 3 Ord. dist. file Z0.6 o mail certified /2E;/ Legal Publication ordered to be published (date) No. Printed copies required Remarks /4, -3- ra