Loading...
Resolution Number 93-6-1-3341 ' RESOLUTION NO. 93-6-1-3 DENYING APPEAL OF DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION - DELETION OF CERTAIN ON-SITE SIGNS, ARCHITECCURAL CONTROL 97 - MM PRICE COMPANY/WFSELOH CAR DEALERSHIP) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN APPEAL OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION OF FEBRUARY 3, 1993, REQUIRING THE DELETION OF THE PROPOSED SIGNS FOR THE WEST SIDE OF THE PROPOSED WESELOH FORD DEALERSHIP AT 33949 DOHENY PARK ROAD/ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL 87-1 (THE PRICE COMPANY/WESELOH CAR DEALERSHIP) WHEREAS, the applicant, The Price Company, P. O. Box 85466, San Diego, California 92186-5466, has requested approval of a modification to Architectural Control 87-1 to permit minor exterior building modifications, landscaping signs and an exception to the lighting standards of Title 9 of the Municipal Code for the project located at the Price Club Center, 33949 Doheny Park Road; and, WHEREAS, this project has been processed and reviewed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (1970); the City's Environmental Review Board reviewed this project and determined that it qualified for issuance of a mitigated negative declaration; and, WHEREAS, on February 3, 1993, the Design Review Commission held a duly -noticed public hearing to receive public comment on Architectural Control 87-1 (modification) and adopted Resolution No. ' DRC 93-2-3-1, conditionally approving said modification; and, WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted an appeal of the condition requiring the deletion of the signs on the west elevation of Building Six of the Price Club Center; and, WHEREAS, on April 6, 1993, the City Council held a duly -noticed public hearing to receive public comment on the appeal of the Design Review Commission's action of February 3, 1993. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of San Juan Capistrano does hereby deny the appeal based on the following findings: 1. The proposed signs are not consistent with the General Plan in that the Community Design Element states that the hilly topography of the City requires special consideration of development, including placement of signs, to protect views both to and from surrounding areas. The proposed location of the signs will not provide any useful business identification of the business to motorists on adjacent roadways or patrons of the Price Club Center. The signs would primarily be visible only to residents in the hills across the valley, negatively impacting their views. 2. The proposed signs are inconsistent with the intent of the Architectural Guidelines and Section 9-3.603 of the Municipal Code, specifically the prevention of sign proliferation which may result in visual blight, in that the signs on the west side of Building Six of the Price Club Center will not be legible from adjacent roadways, and therefore do not serve as useful business 1- 34244 identification, but do contribute to sign proliferation which may result in visual blight and detract from an individual;s perception of the City. Furthermore, the approval of signs which do not provide useful business identification may set a precedent for other businesses along the railroad tracks. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 1st day of June 1993. 4—GILJ S, MAYOR ATTEST: /L%911014- STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO ) 1, CHERYL JOHNSON, City Clerk of the City of San Juan Capistrano, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. 93-6-1-3 adopted by the City Council of the City of San Juan Capistrano, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 4t1i day of June , 1993, by the following vote: AYES: Council Members Hausdorfer, Campbell, Vasquez and Mayor Jones NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Council Member Nash (SEAL) CHERYL JOHN N, MY CLERK V -2-