Loading...
Resolution Number 97-7-15-6os1 RESOLUTION NO. 97-7-15-6 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA, OPPOSING PLAN OF CERTAIN JUANENO BAND INDIANS TO CONSTRUCT A CASINO WITHIN OR IN PROXIMITY TO THE CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO WHEREAS, the Los Angeles Times, on July 5, 1997, reported that certain members of the Juaneno Indian Tribe had secretly entered into an agreement with casino -type gaming interests calling for the construction of a casino on twenty (20) acres of land to be acquired by the Tribe on land located within or about the City of San Juan Capistrano; and, WHEREAS, the Juaneno Indian Tribe has not been formally recognized by the United States Department of Interior; and, WHEREAS, the Los Angeles Times further reported that Directing Attorney for the California Indian Legal Services has opined in March 1997 that these subject agreements are unlawful as they are in violation of Federal law (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, 25 USC 2701 et seq.); and, WHEREAS, the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act requires that any proposal by a recognized Indian Tribe to acquire land for the purpose of constructing a gaming facility must receive approval from the Secretary of the Department of Interior and consent by the Governor of the State of California; and, WHEREAS, the Secretary of Interior may not approve of Indian acquisitions of land for gaming facilities without making a finding that the proposal will not be detrimental to the surrounding community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE TT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of San Juan Capistrano does hereby strongly oppose any proposed acquisition of land for gaming facilities by one or more members of the Juaneno Indian Tribe, or the Tribe itself, for the following reasons: SECTION 1. Adverse Crime Impacts. Gaming casinos have been found to generate a pattern of crimes, as documented by an April 1993 study by the Orange County Sheriffs Department and the Orange County District Attorney's Office, consisting of. follow -home robberies, loan sharking, money laundering, money skimming, bookmaking extortion, gang influences, alcohol and narcotic abuse, prostitution and crimes involving compulsive gamblers. This prevalent crime pattern would clearly pose a public health and safety threat to San Juan Capistrano citizens in that any available vacant 20 -acre plus parcel within the City would border adjoining residential neighborhoods. -1- 052 SECTION 2. Adverse Planning and Zoning Impacts. The following Planing and Zoning adverse impacts would be occasioned by a twenty (20) plus acre casino project: A casino project directly conflicts with the City's General Plan which calls for a "Village -like, Semi -Rural Community": -- A twenty -acre project within the City or immediately adjoining the City would be incompatible with residential subdivisions. This incompatibility arises from the fact that remaining vacant 20 -acre pieces either adjoin or are in close proximity to existing residential subdivisions. This incompatibility would cause zoning conflicts and nuisances, such as: 1. Noise impacts. 2. Traffic congestion. 3. Lighting and glare impacts. 4, Aforementioned crime impacts. SECTION 3. Adverse Aesthetic Impacts. The following adverse aesthetic impacts would arise from a casino project: The project's need for commercial signage and lighting would create a harsh commercial aesthetic blight upon the community. 2. Such a project would result in the construction of monolithic structures. Would result in ugly, large blacktop park areas. SECTION 4. Adverse Traffic Impacts. The following adverse traffic impacts would arise from the project: Traffic congestion on significant City streets, some of which are already overburdened by street traffic. 2. An increase in traffic noise. SECTION 5. Adverse Impact on Public Services. Such a project would substantially deplete existing police, fire, and public facilities services of the City without fiscal contribution from the Proposer. -2- SECTION 6.. Adverse Historic/Archaeological Impacts. Such a project would have possible adverse effects on existing Indian burial grounds and generally conflict with the City's commitment to historic preservation of Indian culture and the heritage of the Mission San Juan Capistrano. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15th day of July , 1997. ATTEST: CITY CLE DAVID M. SWERDLIN, MAYOR -3- 053 054 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO ) I, CHERYL JOHNSON, City Clerk of the City of San Juan Capistrano, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. 97-7-15-6 adopted by the City Council of the City of San Juan Capistrano, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 15th day of July 1997, by the following vote: AYES: Council Members Jones, Greiner, Hart, Campbell and Mayor Swerdlin NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None (SEAL) CHERYL JOHNIOON,tITY CLERK -4-