Loading...
PC Resolution-24-07-10-03PC RESOLUTION NO. 24-07-10-03 Architectural Control (AC) 23-008, Grading Plan Modification (GPM) 23-020, Tree Removal Permit (TRP) 23-024 & Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 23-002 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL (AC) 23-008, GRADING PLAN MODIFICATION (GPM) 23-020, TREE REMOVAL PERMIT (TRP) 23-024 & TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TTM) 23-002 FOR THE CAMINO TWELVE RESIDENTIAL PROJECT LOCATED AT 25642 CAMINO DEL AVION (APN: 668-491-32) AND FIND SAID ACTION IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PER SECTION 15332 WHEREAS, 25642 CDA, LLC (the "Applicant") is proposing the Camino Twelve ("Project"), a .61-acre residential project at 25642 Camino Del Avian (APN: 668- 491-32) ("Project Site"). The Project entitlements required for the Project include, among other approvals, Architectural Control (AC) 23-008, Grading Plan Modification (GPM) 23- 020, Tree Removal Permit (TRP) 23-024, and Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 23-002 to develop a 12-unit residential community; and WHEREAS, the Project Site is designated High Density Residential and Zoned Planned Residential Development; and Whereas, The Applicant is the owner of the Project Site; and WHEREAS, Land Use Code Section 9-4.203 requires a tentative tract map for all subdivisions creating five or more lots. The proposed map entails subdividing the .61-acre site into a twelve unit condominium plan with shared common areas; and WHEREAS, before the City Council may approve a tentative tract map, it must make the findings set forth in Land Use Code Section 9-4.223; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has authority to review and make recommendations to the City Council regarding approval of tentative tract maps; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 21067 of the Public Resources Code, and, Section 15367 of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") Guidelines (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15000 et seq.), the City of San Juan Capistrano is the lead agency for the proposed Project; and WHEREAS, the City's Environmental Administrator has determined that the Project is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15332, In-Fill Development Projects (Class 32); and WHEREAS, as a procedural matter, the Planning Commission would normally be the reviewing body and take final action on the Grading Plan Modification PC Resolution 24-07-10-03 2 July 10, 2024 and Administrative Approval applications. However, since Municipal Code Section 9- 2.318 (c)(4) requires the Planning Commission to provide a recommendation for final action on the Floodplain Land Use Permit to the City Council, staff is presenting all the requested entitlements together as a single package for Planning Commission review and recommendation for approval by the City Council, in accordance with Municipal Code Section 9-2.301 U)(1 ), which authorizes referral of a request for a land use decision to the reviewing authority designated as the appeal body for that type of land use application; and WHEREAS, on June 27, 2024, the City gave notice of the Planning Commission's public hearing by advertisement in a newspaper of general circulation; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a duly-noticed public hearing on July 10, 2024, to consider the proposed Project and its environmental findings, and all evidence presented before and during the hearing and contained in the administrative record, and afforded members of the public an opportunity to comment upon the proposed Project and the CEQA; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully considered the application, all the information submitted by the Applicant, the public, and city staff in connection with the Project, including the agenda report prepared by staff for these and other Project approvals; and WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the recitals above are incorporated herein by reference as findings of the Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of San Juan Capistrano does hereby find that the entire Project is Categorically Exempt from CEQA per the Class 32 (In-Fill Development Projects) categorical exemption set forth in State CEQA Guidelines section 15332 because (1) the Project constitutes in-fill development; (2) The Project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designations and regulations; the Project is consistent with the San Juan Capistrano General Plan and Title 9 of the San Juan Capistrano Municipal Code ("Municipal Code"), Land Use; (3) The Project occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. The Project is located at 25642 Camino Del Avian in the City of San Juan Capistrano, consists of 0.61 acres, and is surrounded by developed Planned Residential Development to the east and south, Public & Institutional to the north, Residential Single-Family (RS) 7,000 to the northwest, and RSF 4 & PRO 22 (Dana Point zoning) to the west; (4) The Biological Due Diligence Investigation, which was reviewed and accepted by the City's third party CEQA review consultant Sagecrest Planning ("Sagecrest"), identifies that the project site has no value, as a habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species ; the Project site has already been developed and currently has a single-family residence on the parcel and therefore PC Resolution 24-07-10-03 3 July 10, 2024 is not a habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species; (5) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; analysis has been conducted to ensure the Project does not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, and water quality, including the following: a Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled Screening Analysis accepted by the City Traffic Engineer, a line of site exhibit accepted by the City Traffic Engineer, a Project Noise Technical Memorandum accepted by Sagecrest, a Project Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Memorandum accepted by Sagecrest, and the Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan accepted by the Public Works Department third party engineer WSP; and (6) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services; the Project site is currently serviced by all required utilities, including but not limited to electricity, garbage, water, and sewer and therefore will remain adequately serviced. The water and sewer service has been demonstrated through conditions of approval from Santa Margarita Water District and electrical and trash service has been demonstrated through will serve letters from each service provider. In addition, none of the exceptions to the categorical exemption as set forth in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 applies: there is no possibility of a cumulative impact of the same type of project in the same place over time. The Project proposes to develop twelve townhome residential units, of which one will be made affordable to a lower income household, on a 0.61-acre site. There is not foreseeable successive project at this site and there is no possibility of a cumulative impact from this same type of project in this area over time; the Project Site is not located within, or visible from, a State Scenic Highway, and the Project will thus not result in damage to scenic resources within a state scenic highway. Nor is the Project Site located on a site that is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. Finally, the Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. The site is located outside of the General Plan's Boundary of Prehistoric and Historic Archeological Resources, which identifies areas of the City which have been assessed to likely to contain historic resources. In addition, the existing residence, built in 1962, is not listed on a local, state or federal register of historic buildings. The Planning Commission hereby directs staff to prepare, execute and file with the Orange County Clerk and the State Clearinghouse a Notice of Exemption within five (5) working days of Project's approval and adoption of this Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of San Juan Capistrano does hereby make the following findings as established by Section 9-3.505, Affordable Housing Requirements, of Title 9, Land Use Code of the City of San Juan Capistrano: 1. The proposed project is entitled to an increase in density, one concession, and waivers to development standards under the state density bonus program because 10% of the units will be restricted to households earning a low income, qualifying the development for up to 20% increase in density, one concession, and waivers to any development standard which would preclude the development from being built at the density allowed under the state density bonus laws. PC Resolution 24-07-10-03 4 July 10, 2024 2. The proposed project is entitled to waivers to development standards under the state density bonus program because a site analysis with all Planned Residential Development district development standards applied, demonstrates that the development would result in a loss of four units. 3. The project applicant requests one concession to the City's Policy regarding prohibited third stories when the code has no third story standards. The Planned Residential Development zone provides setback standards for one story and two-story units, but is silent on third story units, which would otherwise be determined to be unpermitted. 4. The project applicant requests two waivers: 1) Minimum 1 O' -0" separation between buildings and project boundary where 30'-0" is required; and 2) 16'-6" setback from a public street (Del Obispo Street) where 20'-0' is required. 5. The one concession and two waivers would a direct cost reduction to proposed the development, will not have an adverse impact on public health and safety, and will not be contrary to state or federal law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of San Juan Capistrano does hereby make the following findings as established by Section 9-3.505(e), Affordable Housing Requirements, of Title 9, Land Use Code of the City of San Juan Capistrano: 1. The project is consistent with the Land Use Element, including Land Use Goal 2 of the General Plan, which directs the City to "control and direct future growth within the City to preserve the rural village like character of the community". Policy 2.2 of Land Use Plan Goal 2 further states that the City will "assure that new development is consistent and compatible with the existing character of the City". As the City of San Juan Capistrano is almost entirely built out, the proposed 12-unit residential community development uses a site identified in the General Plan for High Density residential with two townhome structures which are generally compatible with the neighboring developments and uses. Neighboring residential developments include the Parkside Place neighborhood, a neighborhood with a High Density land use developed with 39 single family residences at a density of 9.1 dwelling units per acre, located to the east and south of the property. Redeveloping the single family residential lot ensures a development consistent with the High Density Land Use and ensures other more appropriate open space lands remain undisturbed and preserve the predominantly rural village-like character of the City while adding housing stock for the City. 2. Detached and attached single-family residences, manufactured residences, duplexes, and multi-family apartments or townhomes are permitted within the Planned Residential Development (PRO) zoning district. The proposed project would establish a 12-unit residential community and has been designed to meet all applicable development standards and provisions of Title 9 of the San Juan Capistrano Municipal code including lot coverages, setbacks, height requirements, use regulations, and affordable housing requirements which allow for concessions and waivers to standards such as setbacks, height, and parking requirements. Furthermore, the PC Resolution 24-07-10-03 5 July 10, 2024 project requires approval of a Grading Plan Modification, Tree Removal Permit, and Tentative Tract Map concurrently with the architectural control application, and the applicant has concurrently applied for these entitlements. These permits are subject to separate findings which are discussed separately under each permit application. The findings for the other permits can be met and substantial evidence supports those findings. 3. The project has been analyzed for environmental impacts and found to be exempt from California Environmental Quality Act, as the project is a redevelopment of an existing site, infilling an underdeveloped property. Studies and analysists have been completed to confirm that the project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species, and the project will not create adverse impacts to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. 4. The project includes a condition of approval that Affordability Covenants restricting one unit to be made available to a low income household for a period of thirty years, which will be recorded against the property prior to finalizing the Final Tract Map. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that, after careful consideration of the agenda report and all the evidence that was presented in connection with this Project, the Planning Commission of the City of San Juan Capistrano does hereby make the following findings as required by Subsection (c) of Section 9-2.313 Architectural Control Review of Title 9, Land Use Code of the City of San Juan Capistrano: 1. Detached and attached single-family residences, manufactured residences, duplexes, and multi-family apartments or townhomes are permitted within the Planned Residential Development (PRO) zoning district. The proposed Project would establish a 12-unit residential community and has been designed to meet all applicable development standards and provisions of Title 9 of the San Juan Capistrano Municipal code including lot coverages, setbacks, height requirements, use regulations, and affordable housing requirements which allow for concessions and waivers to standards such as setbacks, height, and parking requirements. Furthermore, the Project requires approval of a Grading Plan Modification, Tree Removal Permit, and Tentative Tract Map concurrently with the architectural control application, and the applicant has concurrently applied for these entitlements. These permits are subject to separate findings which are discussed separately under each permit application. The findings for the other permits can be met and substantial evidence supports those findings. 2. The Project is consistent with the Land Use Element, including Land Use Goal 2 of the General Plan, which directs the City to "control and direct future growth within the City to preserve the rural village like character of the community". Policy 2.2 of Land Use Plan Goal 2 further states that the City will "assure that new development is consistent and compatible with the existing character of the City". As the City of San Juan Capistrano is almost entirely built out, the proposed 12-unit residential community development uses a site identified in the General Plan for High Density residential with two townhome structures which are generally compatible with the PC Resolution 24-07-10-03 6 July 10, 2024 neighboring developments and uses. Neighboring residential developments include the Parkside Place neighborhood, a neighborhood with a High Density land use developed with 39 single family residences at a density of 9.1 dwelling units per acre, located to the east and south of the property. Redeveloping the single family residential lot ensures a development consistent with the High Density Land Use and ensures other more appropriate open space lands remain undisturbed and preserve the predominantly rural village-like character of the City while adding housing stock for the City. In addition, the proposed residential buildings are consistent with the Goals and Policies of the Community Design Element. The project is consistent with Policy 1.2 because the residential buildings have been designed with high-quality materials and at a human scale, with resident-oriented recreational space and entryways. The buildings are consistent with Policy 2.1 because the proposed buildings incorporate Coastal Farmhouse architecture, and California native landscape features which complements the City's traditional historic character. Furthermore, the Project is consistent with Policy 2.9 and Program 14 of the Housing Element, because the project would provide one unit for lower income households abiding by the City's lnclusionary Requirement opposed to paying an in-lieu fee, and the project is pursuing a state Density Bonus of up to 20% in addition to the allowed concessions and two waivers to development standards as an incentive to development of affordable housing. 3. The Project site is adequate to provide common and private yards and open spaces, and the required building separation and maximum unit count per building allowed under the Planned Residential Development zoning, the development density, setbacks, three story structures, and parking are compliant with the allowances permitted under the State density bonus laws when providing 10% of the development as affordable housing. The setbacks from the western, southern, and eastern boundaries, as well as the setback from Del Obispo street are proposed to be reduced, which is a part of the Applicant's waiver request. The Applicant has provided 27 parking stalls, three more than what is required by the state Density Bonus Laws. The proposed development is entitled to concessions from the City's prohibition of third stories as the code is silent on the standards for the third floor, allowing the development to consist of two three-story buildings. The development incorporates appropriate vehicular access, including 24'-wide drive aisles from Camino Del Avian and a 26'-wide central driveway. 4. The Project's character, scale and quality of the architecture, site design and landscaping are consistent with the adopted Design Guidelines of the City because the Project incorporates materials and colors consistent with the approved architecture on properties surrounding the site along Del Obispo and Camino Del Avian and similar residential uses located within the City of San Juan Capistrano. Furthermore, the City's Design Review Committee has reviewed the design of the proposed building, site design, and landscaping and recommended approval. PC Resolution 24-07-10-03 7 July 10, 2024 5. The Project's site plan provides functional and safe vehicular and pedestrian access and circulation because the project is accessible from the public right-of-way into the site and provides safe vehicular access. These proposed means of access have been reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineer who determined that the new use, existing access, and proposed central would not have a negative impact to vehicular traffic on Camino Del Avian. 6. The proposed use and design of the Project are compatible with surrounding existing and proposed land uses and community character, including scale, intensity, massing, architectural design, landscape design, and other development characteristics because the proposed building will use colors and materials that are found throughout San Juan Capistrano, and are similar to the architecture and materials of the buildings on adjacent parcels, and is developed under allowances provided under the established High Density land use designation. Finally, the architectural design, landscape, and proposed development features were reviewed by the Design Review Committee, which recommended approval of the designs. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that, after careful consideration of the agenda report and all the evidence that was presented in connection with this Project, the Planning Commission of the City of San Juan Capistrano does hereby make the following findings as required by Subsection (f) of Section 9-2.323 Grading Plan Review and Modification of Title 9, Land Use Code of the City of San Juan Capistrano: 1. The proposed grading modifications are consistent with the General Plan, Land Use Code and Design Guidelines, because the project allows for the development of a use which is permitted by the General Plan and Land Use Code on the property and the grading is proposed in locations which ensure a structure can be built which meets all required development standards established by the Planned Residential Development or qualifies for concessions and waivers to the standards due to provision of affordable housing. While the existing topography needs to be modified in order to facilitate development, the proposed final grade maintain as much of the existing topography as possible, including no changes to the southern or eastern boundary walls. Additionally, the exposed walls due to retaining will be no taller than 5' and be screened by proposed wall landscaping. 2. The proposed grading modifications are generally consistent with the approved site plan, preliminary grading plan, grading standards, and design concepts of the original industrial single family residence previously approved for the site in 1962. The proposed design is consistent because the development is primarily maintaining the existing site topography. The only changes being to expand the developable area toward Del Obispo Street and the northwest corner of the property through new retaining walls and leveling central areas of the site so that the proposed building have a more gradual change in grade. 3. The proposed grading will remain consistent and compatible with immediately adjacent lots. Grading which takes place adjacent to property lines is proposed to tie in directly to the adjacent properties, by creating retaining walls inside the property PC Resolution 24-07-1 0-03 8 July 10, 2024 boundaries and gradually changing the grades immediately adjacent to the north and west property lines so that minimal visual grade changes would occur, and maintaining in place existing retaining walls on the south and east boundaries so that the new development does not impact the adjacent properties. 4. The proposed grading plan shows the location of all proposed building footprints which meet the required minimum setbacks for structures within the Planned Residential Development zone, or qualify for a waiver to the standard. 5. The proposed modified grading will not cause adverse impacts to other properties, including but not limited to potential impacts on hydrology, water quality, views, trail easements, or other aspects of development because the proposed grading is subject to Plan Check review by the City's Engineering Division to ensure that grading will not result in any negative impacts to hydrology, water quality as required by local and state laws. Prior to issuance of grading or building permit, the applicant must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director that the proposed grading will not result in any negative impacts to hydrology, and water quality as required by local and state laws. Additionally, the grading modifications do not impact views or trail easements because the changes include a cut to the existing grades reducing the building pad heights and the grade's potential to impact views. The only area which is proposed to include fill is immediately adjacent to Del Obispo Street and would support the residential entryways. The fill is proposed to gradually increase as it gets further from Del Obispo Street making an approximate 6' grade increase 1 O' from the property line. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that, after careful consideration of the agenda report and all the evidence that was presented in connection with this Project, the Planning Commission of the City of San Juan Capistrano does hereby make the following findings as required by Subsection (e) of Section 9-2.349 Tree Removal Permit of Title 9, Land Use Code of the City of San Juan Capistrano: 1. The removal of the trees will not have an adverse impact on the adjacent properties or the general welfare since the project proposes to replace the trees at a 1 :1 ratio, ensuring the established tree canopy within the city remains intact. Further, all replaced trees are proposed to be 36" box trees which will take less time to mature. Such replacements will not adversely impact views, public streetscapes, and aesthetics of the site. 2. Although the development proposal and grading of the site for new buildings requires the removal of 18 trees on the site, the Applicant has proposed to install 22 new trees throughout the site as replacements. The five jacaranda trees and one Camphor tree which are proposed to be removed from the Del Obispo frontage will be replaced with four Yucca Aloifolia trees, three Arbutus 'Marina' trees, one pepper tree, and one California sycamore tree. The three Liquid Amber trees and one Valley Oak tree which are proposed to be removed from the Camino Del Avion frontage are proposed to be replaced with three Desert Willow trees. Finally, the eight Strawberry trees proposed to be removed from the internal site are proposed to be replaced with one Pepper tree, one California sycamore tree, four Brisbane Box trees, and four Kanooka trees. In time, the replacement trees will replace the current urban forest canopy. PC Resolution 24-07-10-03 9 July 10, 2024 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that, after careful consideration of the agenda report, including its detailed discussion of these findings, and all the other evidence that was presented in connection with this Project, the Planning Commission of the City of San Juan Capistrano does hereby make the following findings as required by Section 9-4.223, Findings for approval of tentative maps, of Title 9, Land Use Code of the City of San Juan Capistrano: 1. The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan and the applicable specific plan and comprehensive development plan because the land uses proposed are allowed within the Planned Residential Development (PRD) zoning, and under the current General Plan land use designation of High Density residential, and the Project is consistent with the PRD and General Plan goals, policies, and standards as discussed above in connection with the Planning Commission's approvals for the Project. Additionally, the project is not located within a specific plan area; and, 2. The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan and the applicable comprehensive development plan because the proposed subdivision has been designed to accommodate the Project, and the Project design itself is consistent with those policy and regulatory documents, The proposed Project would establish a 12-unit residential community and has been designed to meet all applicable development standards and provisions of Title 9 of the San Juan Capistrano Municipal Code including setbacks, use regulations, and affordable housing requirements which allow for concessions and waivers to standards such as setbacks and parking requirements. Furthermore, the Project's character, scale and quality of the architecture, site design and landscaping are consistent with the adopted Design Guidelines of the City because the Project incorporates materials and colors consistent with the approved structures on properties surrounding the site along Del Obispo Street and Camino Del Avian and similar residential uses located within the City of San Juan Capistrano; and, 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development because State Density Bonus Laws and the General Plan land use designation would allow for the residential development with a density of up to 21.6 dwelling units/acre and the applicant is proposing to develop the parcel with a density of 19.67 dwelling units/acre. The Project is an infill, previously graded site, with established access to Camino Del Avian and buildings have been situation to provide distance and a landscape buffer between the proposed residential development and the adjacent properties. 4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed intensity of development permitted by the State Density Bonus Laws because the existing topography and infrastructure provides suitable conditions sufficient to accommodate the proposed improvements. Located generally along the same grade as the adjacent residential properties, the site is relatively flat and large enough to accommodate the uses and development proposed. Additionally, the site will be served by existing utilities which service the current single-family residence; and, 5. The design of the subdivision for the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife PC Resolution 24-07-10-03 10 July 10, 2024 or their habitat because the project includes an assessment of the Project's potentially impacts to traffic, water quality, noise, air quality and greenhouse gas, and biological resources, and through these reports and confirmation from City consulted expert peer reviews of these assessments, concludes that there are no environmental impacts from the proposed project. Additionally, project will not have an environmental impact on historical or cultural resources because the site is located outside of the General Plan's Boundary of Prehistoric and Historic Archeological Resources, which identifies areas of the City which have been assessed to likely to contain historic resources and the existing residence, built in 1962, is not listed on a local, state or federal register of historic buildings; and, 6. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision because the Project proposes to honor or extend all public easements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of San Juan Capistrano hereby recommends City Council approval of Architectural Control (AC) 23-008, Grading Plan Modification (GPM) 23-020, Tree Removal Permit (TRP) 23-024, and Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 23-002, subject to those conditions of approval that are applicable to these entitlements as established by Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS: The documents and materials associated with this Resolution that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings are based are located at San Juan Capistrano City Hall, 32400 Paseo Adelanto, San Juan Capistrano, California 92675. The Development Services Director is the custodian of records for the record of proceedings. EFFECTIVE DATE & FINAL APPROVAL: This Project approval shall become effective following expiration of the fifteen (15) day appeal period without filing of an appeal application. The appeal period shall expire at 5:30 pm, July 25, 2024. These Project approvals shall be valid for a period of two (2) years from the effective date of this the City Council's Approval, unless a time extension request is granted by the Zoning Administrator or building and grading permits related to this discretionary approval have been issued with commencement of construction prior to that date. PROTEST OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS: Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020, the applicant may protest the imposition of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions imposed on this development project by taking the necessary steps and following the procedures established by Sections 66020 through 66022 of the California Government Code. [Signatures on Following Page] PC Resolution 24-07-10-03 11 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPT Joel Roj Secreta July 10, 2024 EXHIBIT "A" P.C. RESOLUTION 24-07-10-03 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PROJECT LOG#: AC 23-008, GPM 23-020, TRP 23-024, and Vesting TTM 23-002 PROJECT NAME: Camino Twelve Residential Project Architectural Control (AC) 23-008, Grading Plan Modification (GPM) 23-020, Tree Removal Permit (TRP) 23-024, and Vesting Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 23-002 are recommended for approval subject to compliance, to the reasonable satisfaction of the Development Services Department, with all applicable sections of the San Juan Capistrano Municipal Code, the California Administrative Code, the California Building Standards Code and all other applicable regulations. The applicant must comply in full with each and every condition listed below prior to exercising the rights conferred by the above referenced approved applications. These conditions of approval apply to the above-referenced project application described in more detail below. For the purpose of these conditions, the term "applicant" shall also mean the developer, the owner or any successor(s) in interest to the terms of this approval. Approval of these applications is contingent upon the City Council final approval. General Conditions: 1 . The applicant proposes to develop twelve townhome residential units, of which one will be made affordable to a lower income household, on a 0.61-acre site at 25642 Camino Del Avian. This project approval is based on and subject to the application materials prepared by RRM Design Architects, LLP, dated July 2, 2024, including building elevation(s), floor plan(s), grading, sign plans, landscaping, site plan and materials board plan. These plans and the proposed use of the project site are hereby incorporated by reference into this approval as submitted and conditioned herein and shall not be further altered unless reviewed and approved by the affected city departments. Minor modifications to this project approval may be approved by the Development Services Director pursuant to Section 9-2.303, Administrative approvals of Title 9, Land Use Code. 2. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of San Juan Capistrano and its officers, employees, and agents from and against any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of San Juan Capistrano, its officers, employees, or agents to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval or condition of approval of the City of San Juan Capistrano concerning this project, including but not limited to any approval or condition of approval of the City Council, Planning Commission, or Development Services Director. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding concerning Resolution 24-07-10-03 Camino Twelve Residential Proiect Conditions of Approval Page 2 of 13 the project and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. The City reserves the right, at its own option, to choose its own attorney to represent the City, its officers, employees, and agents in the defense of the matter. 3. Pursuant to Section 8-2.04 of the Building Code, the applicant shall ensure that all construction activities, which includes the delivery and/or recovery of materials, supplies or construction equipment, shall be conducted in accordance with the prescribed hours of operation as follows: Monday through Friday Saturday 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m . 4. Construction activity is prohibited on Sundays and on any federal holiday unless waived by the Building Official for extenuating reasons. 5. The applicant shall comply with all requirements from the Building & Safety Division and all other City departments. 6. The applicant shall schedule a final inspection with the Development Services Department, the Public Works Division, and the Engineering and Environmental Services Department to inspect the final construction of improvements related to their department's discipline to ensure consistency with the approved plans and conditions of approval. 7. Compliance with Outside Requirements. Approval of this application does not relieve the applicant from complying with other applicable Federal, State, County, Orange County Fire Authority, Santa Margarita Water District or City regulations or requirements. To the extent not precluded by Government Code Section 65961, the applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Municipal Code, all requirements of City ordinances, resolutions, and all applicable standards and policies that are in effect at the time that building permits are issued for the development. 8. Signed Plans. All plans, specifications, studies, reports, calculations, maps, notes, legal documents, and designs shall be prepared, stamped and signed, if required, only by those individuals legally authorized to do so. 9. Applicant Responsibilities. The applicant shall be responsible for informing all subcontractors, consultants, engineers, or other business entities providing services related to the project of their responsibilities to comply with these conditions of approval and all pertinent requirements in the San Juan Capistrano Municipal Code, including the requirement that a business license be obtained by all entities doing business in the City. 10. Discrepancy Clause. In the event that exhibits, and written conditions are inconsistent, the written conditions shall prevail. If there are any disparities Resolution 24-07-10-03 Camino Twelve Residential Proiect Conditions of Approval Page 3 of 13 between these conditions and the plans or final revised plans that are approved for any subsequent phase, the conditions and/or plans as stipulated in the later approval shall prevail. 11 . Fees. The applicant shall pay all fees at the time fees are determined payable and comply with all requirements of the applicable federal, state, and local agencies. The duty of inquiry as to such requirements shall be upon the applicant. 12. Compliance with SCAQMD Rule 1403 regarding the surveying, notification, and removal of asbestos shall be required during demolition. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF ANY FINAL MAP: 13. Final Tract Map. Final Tract Map shall be in substantial compliance with the Vesting Tentative Tract Map (TTM), Subdivision Map Act and submitted for review and approval to the City Engineer's satisfaction prior to issuance of any permits including but not limited to; grading, building, utility, and/or encroachments unless otherwise allowed by the City Engineer. At a minimum, Final Tract Map shall include information related to all existing and proposed easements, dedications, property lines, flood zones, utilities, ownership, lot sizes, legal descriptions, and site data as required by Public Works, Planning, and Engineering. 14. Compliance with Map Act and Municipal Code. Prior to approval of the final map, the tract map shall be prepared and submitted in full compliance with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and the City of San Juan Capistrano Municipal Code, except as authorized by the City Council and/or Planning Commission. (PW) 15. Payment of Fees. Prior to approval of the final map the applicant/sub-divider shall fulfill all applicable fee requirements in accordance with the City Municipal Code, as last revised and the City Schedules of Rates and Charges, as last revised. 16. Construction Cost Estimates. Prior to approval of the final . map, the applicant/subdivider shall submit an estimate of quantities and construction costs of all proposed Works of Improvements (e.g. Street/Sewer/Water/Drainage/Landscaping Irrigation etc.) associated with this development prepared by a California State Registered Civil Engineer pursuant to the City requirements to the City Engineer and Assistant Utilities Director for review and approval. Said estimates shall include, but not be limited to , the costs for construction of all on-site and off-site improvements for street, signing and striping, traffic signals, street lights, storm drains, water, sewer, landscape, Resolution 24-07-10-03 Camino Twelve Residential Proiect Conditions of Approval Page 4 of 13 irrigation systems, recreational trails, and the setting of survey monuments and centerline ties. Labor cost of all cost estimates of facilities that will be dedicated to the City for operation and maintenance shall comply with the California Labor Code Section 1720-17 43 with respect to the prevailing wages. Any exception to or deviation from this condition shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 17. Bonding and Securities. Prior to approval of the final map, the applicant/subdivider shall execute a Subdivision Improvement Agreement with the City and shall provide performance bonds/securities for 100 percent of each estimated Works of Improvement costs, inclusive of soft costs (e.g. Materials Testing, Inspection, Construction Management, Surveying, etc.), as prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer, Assistant Utilities Director and City Attorney for all onsite and offsite improvements including, but not limited to, street improvements, signing, signalization, striping and street lights, storm drains, sewer, water, recreational trails, landscaping and irrigation in rights-of-way, private slopes, and open space. In addition, the applicant/subdivider shall provide labor and materials bonds/securities for 100 percent of the above estimated improvement costs, inclusive of the associated soft costs, as determined by the City Engineer. Labor cost of all improvements to be dedicated to City as public facilities to operate and maintain shall be per prevailing wages rate per California Labor Code Section 1720-17 43. An additional bond, as determined by the City Engineer, shall be required for street maintenance purposes to ensure the conditions of all local driveways/streets within the subdivision, including the offsite emergency access road, are acceptable to the City Engineer. 18. Tentative Map Compliance and Closure Calculations. Prior to approval of the final map, the applicant/subdivider shall submit to the City Engineer for review, and shall obtain approval/recordation of, a final map in substantial compliance with the approved tentative map. Said map shall be accompanied with traverse closure calculations and an updated Title Search Report. Any exception or deviation to the above requirements shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 19. Homeowners Association-Maintained Improvements. Prior to approval of the final map, the applicant/subdivider shall indicate on the final map that all improvements, including but not limited to, streets, drainage, lights, street signage, striping improvements, the water quality best management practices identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), parks, graded slopes, landscaping, and irrigation facilities within the interior of the subdivision are owned by the Association, and shall be maintained by the master association and/or sub-association or shall make other provisions for maintenance to be approved by the City. Resolution 24-07-10-03 Camino Twelve Residential Project Conditions of Approval Page 5 of 13 20. Prior to approval of the final map, the applicant/subdivider shall submit a precise grading plan(s) prepared by a California State Registered Civil Engineer to the Development Services Director for City review and approval by the City Engineer and Building Official. The precise grading plan(s) shall be consistent with the approved rough grading plan and the approved Tentative Tract Map. 21. Dedications and Maintenance Responsibi lity. Prior to approval of the final map, the applicant/subdivider shall indicate on the final map, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, all appropriate dedication and access rights, stating their purposes and their maintenance responsibilities. 22. CC&Rs. Prior to approval of the final map, the applicant/subdivider shall submit for review, and shall obtain the approval of, the Development Services Director, City Engineer, Public Works, and City Attorney, a set of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs). Said CC&Rs shall be recorded with the final map and shall include, but not be limited to, the following: a. Creation of a Homeowners Association and/or a Sub-Association for the purpose of providing for control over the uniformity of boundary fencing, and the perpetual maintenance responsibility of areas including, but not limited to, all common areas, open space, project entries, slopes, fuel modification zones, private medians and greenbelts, private parks, irrigation systems, landscaped areas, walls, driveways, parking areas, structures, private streets, street lights, drainage facilities, and all other areas to be owned and maintained by the Homeowners Association and/or Sub-association. All improvements, including but not limited to, streets, restoration of enhanced pavement over the public water and sewer facilities after repairing of said facilities by the City, drainage, street lights, street signage, striping improvements, parks, graded slopes, landscaping, and irrigation facilities within the interior of the subdivision designated as private shall remain private and shall be maintained by the Homeowners Association and/or Sub-association, or shall make other provision for maintenance, as approved by the City Council. b. The establishment of setback and height requirements for additions and accessory structures that conform to the development standards of the San Juan Capistrano Land Use Code. c. A statement indicating that proposed amendments to any of the CC&Rs which impact, change or modify any Conditions of Approval, or other City regulations or requirements, shall be submitted for review to the Development Services Director and that, if the Director determines that the amendment adversely affects any project conditions of approval or other City regulations or requirements, the amendment will then require City Council approval prior to the amendment becoming valid. d. OCFA prevention and defense provisions including: 1) an OCFA lane map, if required by the OCFA Chief; 2) provisions which prohibit parking in OCFA lanes and a method of enforcement; 3) a method for keeping OCFA Resolution 24-07-10-03 Camino Twelve Residential Proiect Conditions of Approval Page 6 of 13 protection access easements unobstructed; and 4) a requirement for approval of the OCFA Chief for modifications such as installation of speed humps or bumps, control gate changes, or parking changes. e. Provisions for maintenance by the homeowners association of the water quality best management practices identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), of all private drainage facilities, including retention/detention basins, that are made a part of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit issued by the City, and for inspection of basins annually. The HOA shall have a line item in the annual budget for the implementation of the required operations and maintenance identified in the approved Water Quality Management Plan. f. A provision that gives the City the right to assume inspection and maintenance of any NPDES facilities, if the City determines that the homeowners association has not maintained said facilities in accordance with the permit requirements, and that, in such event, the homeowners association shall be financially responsible to pay City for the costs the City incurs in such maintenance role. g. A provision that requires City approval of any amendment to the CC&Rs that will, in any manner, affect the maintenance, function, or integrity of NPDES facilities. h. A statement indicating that by July first of every year, annual fiscal year reports will be furnished to the City in compliance with the reporting requirements of codes and ordinances adopted by the City with respect to the NPDES program. i. A provision requiring that all landscape contractors properly train their field crews so as to prevent improper pruning/trimming or ornamental maintenance of the California native plants, and providing an enforceable penalty which the HOA may impose on the landscape contractor for violation of this provision including but not limited to replacement of plant material with comparably sized new plant material. j. A provision that each owner shall at all times ensure that their garage accommodates at least the number of vehicles for which it was originally constructed. The garages shall be used for parking of vehicles and storage of personal property only. Use of portions of the garage for storage shall be permitted only if the garage can still accommodate the parking of two (2) vehicles. No garage may be used for any dwelling, commercial or other purpose, regardless of how many vehicles are owned by the residents. Owners are permitted to park their vehicles in the garage only. k. A provision that the homeowners association has the right and power to enforce all parking and vehicle use regulations, applicable to the development, including the removal of violating vehicles from parking areas. I. A provision that the HOA has the power to: (a) establish additional rules and regulations concerning parking in the development, (b) prohibit any vehicle parking, operation, repair, maintenance or restoration activity in the development if it determines in its sole discretion that the activity is a nuisance, and (c) promulgate rules and regulations concerning vehicles and Resolution 24-07-10-03 Camino Twelve Residential Proiect Conditions of Approval Page 7 of 13 parking in the Development as it deems necessary, including reserving the right to inspect garages. m. A provision that the homeowners association (HOA) would be responsible for the cost of replacement and restoration of any enhanced paving or stamped-concrete removed by the City for the purpose of maintaining, replacing, repairing, or otherwise conducting work on underground utilities including but not limited to waterlines, sanitary sewer lines, and storm drainage lines within the proposed private streets. n. A provision that the homeowners association (HOA) will require that prior to completing any landscape improvements on the property, the applicant/owner shall submit a preliminary landscape plan to the homeowners association's Architectural Review Board for review and approval and shall meet the following standards: i. The HOA Architectural Review Board shall encourage front yard and side yards visible from the street to be landscaped with a drought tolerant and California-friendly plant palette as approved by the City. ii. Failure of any lot owner to comply with these landscape provisions shall be deemed a violation of the Conditions, Covenants & Restrictions (CC&Rs) and shall be punishable accordingly under the violations & penalties section of the CC&Rs 23. Submission of Digital Map. Prior to recordation of the final map, the applicant/subdivider shall submit for review, and shall obtain approval from the Orange County surveyor, of a digitized map pursuant to Orange County Ordinance 3809 of January 28, 1991. The applicant/subdivider shall pay for all cost of said digital submittal, including supplying digital copies to the City, of the final County Surveyor approved digital map in DXF format. In addition, the applicant/subdivider shall provide the City with digitized copies of all improvement (as-built) plans. 24. If applicable, applicant shall obtain off-site easements from the affected property owner(s) for all proposed off-site improvements (i.e. slopes, street improvements, walls, drainage, etc.). The applicant shall bear all costs for obtaining said easements. If said easements cannot be obtained, the project shall be redesigned to incorporate these improvements entirely within the project boundary as approved by the City. The City Engineer shall have the right to withhold approval of the affected improvement plans for failure to satisfy this condition. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY GRADING PERMIT(S): 25. A preliminary Drainage Plan and Study has been provided. Remaining technical comments from the City's 3rd party consultant, Gong Enterprises, Inc. letter dated May 6, 2024, shall be addressed. Provided as Appendix 1. Resolution 24-07-10-03 Camino Twelve Residential Proiect Conditions of Approval Page 8 of 13 26. An updated Site Plan(s) has been provided. Remaining technical comments from the City's 3rd party consultant, Gong Enterprises, Inc. letter dated May 6, 2024, shall be addressed. Provided as Appendix 1. 27. An updated Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been provided. Remaining technical comments from the City's 3rd party consultant, provided as WQMP Comments-Responses Matrix provided to the applicant on May 15, 2024, shall be addressed. Provided as Appendix 2. 28. Mitigation of Drainage and Grading Problems. Prior to issuance of grading or right-of-way improvement permits, the applicant/subdivider shall adhere to the following conditions during the entire grading and construction operation: a. If any drainage problem is anticipated or occurs during construction, the applicant/subdivider shall provide and implement a solution acceptable to the City Engineer, at no cost to the City, and shall submit a recorded instrument to insure the durability of the solution. b. Any grading work beyond the limits of grading shown on the approved grading plans shall require a written approval from the City Engineer and shall be subject to a supplemental Geotechnical Soils Report and additional fees. 29. Submit electronic and hard copies of all applicable documents listed on the "Plan Check Submittal Requirements" form located at the Building and Planning Counter. This includes and is not limited to: Grading plans that include cross sections to show all existing structures on and/or abutting properties within twenty-five (25) feet of property lines or limit of work, applicable utility plans, Final WQMP (Or WQMP Checklist), Geotechnical report with wet ink signatures (report or addendum letter cannot be over one (1) year old), Hydrology and Hydraulic analyses/report (Incorporate hydraulic analysis for any natural drainage courses and/or stream embankments where applicable. Applicant shall match peak runoff rates for the 25-year and 100-year storm events.), retaining wall calculations, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to mitigate erosion and sediment form leaving the site during construction activities, Erosion and Sediment Control Plans (ESCP) including backup calculations and data, and an engineer's cost estimate for grading activities (including retaining walls), erosion/sediment control BMPs, and any off-site improvements. 30. Incorporate hydraulic analysis for any natural drainage courses and/or stream embankments where applicable. Applicant shall match peak runoff rates for the 25-year and 100-year storm events. Accommodate run-on from adjacent areas when applicable. 31. Utilize City Standard sheet layout (including size) and Standard Notes, as applicable. Resolution 24-07-10-03 Camino Twelve Re~idential Proiect Conditions of Approval Page 9 of13 32. Dry Utilities (Electric, Telephone, Cable TV, Gas). Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for review, and shall obtain approval of, Electrical, Gas, Telephone and Cable Television installation plans to ensure compatibility with existing and proposed improvements. All utility facilities shall be underground. Vaults, transformers, juncture boxes, or any similar devices shall not be permitted above ground. Any deviation from these requirements shall be subject to prior City Engineer review and approval. 33. Recycling/Reduce Debris Act of 1989 (CIWMA). Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant/subdivider shall submit to the City Engineer for review, and shall obtain approval of, a program complying with the requirements of the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 to reduce construction and demolition debris through recycling. 34. Provide engineer cost estimate for grading, drainage, and erosion/sediment control BMPs. 35. Submit grading surety agreement and security. 36. Submit digitally signed Mylars of plan set for City Engineer's signature. 37. Capistrano Circulation Fee Program (CCFP). Except as otherwise set out in accordance with a schedule in the Subdivision Improvement Agreement to be executed in conjunction with City approval of the first final map, the applicant/subdivider shall pay fees, in the amount prescribed by the City Council at the time of issuance, as required by the CCFP, at issuance of each building permit. 38. An Encroachment Permit is required for work and construction-related activities in the public right-of-way. These include, but may not be limited to, utility connections, truck hauling, traffic control, site ingress and egress, hours of operation in the right-of-way, street cleaning, etc. 39. Prior to the removal of any approved tree, the applicant must comply with all applicable Federal, State, County or City regulations or requirements, including the San Juan Capistrano's Municipal Code Section 5-5.01 through 5-5.05 Bird Sanctuary or the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act, which establishes prohibitions on the disturbance and/or removal of certain native bird nests. Any tree which has not been approved as a part of this project may require a Tree Removal Permit to be reviewed and approved in accordance with Municipal Code Section 9-2.349. 40. Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Fish and Game Code (Pre-Construction Nesting Bird Clearance Surve). Nesting birds are protected pursuant to the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and California Fish and Game Code (Sections 3503, 3503.5, 3511, and 3513 prohibit the take, possession, or destruction of birds, Resolution 24-07-10-03 Camino Twelve Residential Proiect Conditions of Approval Page 10 of 13 their nests or eggs). In order to protect migratory bird species, a nesting bird clearance survey will be conducted prior to any vegetation removal activities that may disrupt the birds during the nesting season and submitted to the City prior to grading permit issuance. Consistent with these regulations, if construction occurs between February 1st and August 31st, a preconstruction clearance survey for nesting birds should be conducted within three (3) days of the start of any vegetation removal to ensure that no nesting birds will be disturbed during construction. The biologist conducting the clearance survey should document a negative survey with a brief letter report indicating that no impacts to active avian nests will occur. If an active avian nest is discovered during the pre-construction clearance survey, construction activities should stay outside of a no-disturbance buffer. The size of the no-disturbance buffer will be determined by the wildlife biologist and will depend on the level of noise and/or surrounding anthropogenic disturbances, line of sight between the nest and the construction activity, type and duration of construction activity, ambient noise, species habituation, and topographical barriers. These factors will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when developing buffer distances. Limits of construction to avoid an active nest will be established in the field with flagging, fencing, or other appropriate barriers; and construction personnel will be instructed on the sensitivity of nest areas. A biological monitor should be present to delineate the boundaries of the buffer area and to monitor the active nest to ensure that nesting behavior is not adversely affected by the construction activity. Once the young have fledged and left the nest, or the nest otherwise becomes inactive under natural conditions, construction activities within the buffer area can occur. 41. Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA). All items from OCFA comment letter, dated May 6, 2024, shall be addressed. Provided as Appendix 3. 42. Santa Margarita Water District (SMWD). Prepare and submit all improvements development project construction plans involving DW and sewer facilities on 22" x 34" paper size. Also provide in pdf format for SMWD review. 43. SMWD. Submit previous red line and other SMWD review comments with revised plan submissions, otherwise resubmittal items will not be accepted for review and/or returned. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMIT(S): 44. Development Plans. Prior to issuance of the first building permit for each development phase, the applicant/subdivider shall submit development plans to the Development Services Director for City review and approval. Plans to be reviewed shall be as applicable to the particular development phase under review and, in general, shall include grading plans (unless previously approved Resolution 24-07-10-03 Camino Twelve Residential Project Conditions of Approval Page 11 of 13 by the City), final site and landscape plans, park plans (if applicable to the development phase), architectural elevations, wall/fence plans, project entry and gate plans, sample material boards, and other plans as specified by the Development Services Director. Final plans shall be in substantial compliance with preliminary plans approved as part of the development review process. 45. Density Bonus Affordable Housing Requirement. The applicant/subdivider shall meet the General Plan Housing Element's affordable housing requirement by prior to the issuance of the 1st building permit providing for the development of a minimum of 10% of the total number of units as affordable to lower income households or an in-lieu fee. Further, the development has received certain bonuses, concessions, and standards under the Density Bonus Law. Units which are designated as affordable housing units will be subject to a City- approved and recorded Density Bonus Affordability Agreement restricting the rental and/or sale of such units to qualifying "low income" households for a period of not less than thirty (30) years. The applicant/subdivider shall be responsible for securing the required Density Bonus Affordable Agreement with the City of San Juan Capistrano for the development of such affordable housing prior to the issuance of the 1st building permit for any housing unit. Should the full 10% inclusionary requirement not be satisfied by units, the Housing In-Lieu Fee as determined by SJCMC Section 9-5.103 shall be due prior to Certificate of Occupancy. 46. Tract Maps for condominium purposes are subject to the following conditions of approval: a. Each dwelling unit shall conform to current noise and energy insulation standards required by the latest adopted California Building Code or other applicable law or regulation. b. Each unit shall have installed smoke detectors as required by the latest adopted edition of the California Building Code. c. A single designated area having a minimum of 200 cubic feet of enclosed, weatherproof, lockable, private and secure storage space shall be provided for each unit. Said storage area may be located within a garage, provided it does not interfere with garage use for automobile parking and is located within a reasonable proximity to the unit. d. Separate laundry facilities of sufficient size to allow for the installation of a clothes washer and dryer shall be provided for each condominium unit. If provided within a garage, said laundry area shall not encroach into required parking spaces. e. Each dwelling unit shall be separately metered for gas and electricity. f. A separate shut-off valve for natural gas, water, and electricity shall be provided within each dwelling unit, unless utilities are provided by a homeowners' association. g. All permanent mechanical equipment, including domestic appliances, which is determined by the Building Official to be a source or potential source of vibration or noise, shall be shock-mounted, isolated from the floor and Resolution 24-07-10-03 Camino Twelve Residential Proiect Conditions of Approval Page 12 of 13 ceiling, or otherwise installed in a manner approved by the Building Official to lessen the transmission of vibration and noise. h. The water system shall comply with current fire flow requirements. i. All structures and buildings included as part of a condominium project shall conform to the building and zoning requirements applicable to the zone in which the project is proposed to be located. Designation of individual condominium units shall not be deemed to reduce or eliminate any of the building and zoning requirements applicable to any such buildings or structures. j. A two hour fire rated separation sound attenuated wall shall be provided between dwelling units. 47. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a photometric plan shall be provided demonstrating that SJCMC Section 9-3.529 Lighting Standards are being satisfied with all proposed site lighting. 48. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the project applicant shall require the construction contractor to follow notes in the plans which include the standard requirements from South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 403 with regards to fugitive dust control, which includes, but are not limited to the following: a. All active construction areas shall be watered two (2) times daily. b. Speed on unpaved roads shall be reduced to less than 15 mph. c. Any visible dirt deposition on any public roadway shall be swept or washed at the site access points within 30 minutes. d. Any on site stockpiles of debris, dirt or other dusty material shall be covered or watered twice daily. e. All operations on any unpaved surface shall be suspended if winds exceed 15 mph. f. Access points shall be washed or swept daily. g. Construction sites shall be sandbagged for erosion control. h. Apply nontoxic chemical soil stabilizers according to manufacturers' specifications to all inactive construction areas (previously graded areas inactive for 10 days or more). i. Cover all trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials, and maintain at least 2 feet of freeboard space in accordance with the requirements of California Vehicle Code (CVC) section 23114. j. Pave or gravel construction access roads at least 100 feet onto the site from the main road and use gravel aprons at truck exits. k. Replace the ground cover of disturbed areas as quickly possible. 49. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the project applicant shall require the construction contractor to follow notes in the plans which include the SCAQMD Rule 1403 requirements for proper removal of asbestos that includes but are not limited to the following: Resolution 24-07-10-03 Camino Twelve Residential Proiect Conditions of Approval Page 13 of 13 a. Prior to the start of demolition activities, the structure shall be thoroughly surveyed for the presence of asbestos by a person that is certified by Cal/OSHA for asbestos surveys. b. If asbestos is found, the SCAQMD shall be notified a minimum of 10 days before any demolition activities begin with specific details of all asbestos to be removed, start and completion dates of demolition, work practices and engineering controls to be used to contain the asbestos emissions, estimates on the amount of asbestos to be removed, the name of the waste disposal site where the asbestos will be taken, and names and addresses of all contractors and transporters that will be involved in the asbestos removal process. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: 50. Monumentation. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the 1st building within the project, the applicant/subdivider's surveyor shall set monuments related to the subject property(ies) and re-establish any damaged or destroyed monumentation during construction. Monumentation, street centerline ties and appropriate corner records shall be submitted to the City Engineer and filed with the County Surveyor in compliance with AB 1414 and Sec. 8771 of the Business and Professions Code. 51. Installation of Landscaping and Irrigation System. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first building within each development phase (other than model units), the applicant/subdivider shall submit a letter to the Development Services Director, signed by a Registered Landscape Architect, stating that all materials for all landscaped areas have been installed in accordance with the approved plans for each development phase, and shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director that all landscaped areas have been landscaped per the approved landscape and irrigation plans. The applicant shall provide as-built landscape and irrigation plans that identify all deltas (changes) to Development Services. 52. Water Quality Management Plan Operations and Maintenance Recordation. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first building, the applicant/subdivider shall provide proof of recordation of the WQMP Operations and Maintenance section of the Water Quality Management Plan. Appendix 1: May 6, 2024 Preliminary Drainage Plan & Study, and Site Plan Technical Comments, Gong Enterprises, Inc. Appendix 2: May 15, 2024 Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Technical Comments from WPS Engineering Appendix 3: May 6, 2024 OCFA Comment Letter GoNG ENTERPRJSES, INc. CIVIL ENGTNEERING/CONSUL T ANTS TO GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES May 6, 2024 Mr. Craig Bradshaw, PE City of San Juan Capistrano 30448 Rancho Viejo Road San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Send to: City of San Juan Capistrano Re: 25642 Camino Del Avion (Vesting TTM 19310), San Juan Capistrano 3rd Plan Check -AC23-008) Dear Craig: In accordance with our contract with the City of San Juan Capistrano (CITY), we have provided a review of subject Vesting TTM 19310. / have no further comments. Pis be aware of the following that will assist the reviewer when post entitlement plans are reviewed : (Shts C1 and C2): • Existing easements have been plotted. Existing easements 4 and 5 need to be quitclaimed (to be deferred to Post-entitlement phase). • Configuration of the drive aisle and parking stalls do allow for a vehicle to turn around within the condominium site. • Proposed drainage features are shown (30" pipe -serves as detention basin, catch basins, and MWS unit. • Proposed onsite sewer lines/laterals are shown and serve each unit. The sewer mainline connects to the existing sewer main in Park Avenue. • Plans show proposed public water meters. Onsite water lines are not shown (this is ok). • A new driveway approach with new sidewalk behind the approach is proposed, along with new sidewalk along Camino Del Avion. Drainage: • Cales show that post-developed condition have been mitigated to equal or to be less than the existing condition 0100 +/-. • Due to a true sump situation for the site, A sump pump with an inlet serves as the 2ndary drainage pathway. If the onsite catch basins clog or a larger than 025 storm occurs, the excess flows will be drain into the sump pump, then flows will be pumped into Del Obispo Street via pipe force main and parkway culvert. • Onsite detention (30" RCP) will be required. 7755 Center Avenue, Suite I 100 / Huntington Beach, CA 92647/ Ph: (714) 372-4959/ Fax (714) 372-4968 Email : GONGENTERPRISES@YAHOO.COM Plan Check / Consulting EXHIBIT A- APPENDIX 1 • Referenced Plans reviewed : Sheets C1 and C2 Hydrology Report and Maps Should you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. Very truly yours, Ken Gong, PE SJC-25642Camino□e1Avion(AC23-00B).3F Email: (w/o enclosures): PW Dev, CITY Justin lnducil, CITY Chris Shyy, CITY Subject plans and ca/cs were reviewed for substantial compliance with design concepts, and City of San Juan Capistrano standards, codes, and criteria. GEi is not responsible for design, errors and omissions, or design accuracy. 2 WQMP Comments-Responses Matrix City Project Number: A_C23-008 Plan Checker Name/Contact: Keegan Holst, PE; Keri Gannon. PE Project Name: Jentative_Tract No. 19310 Responder Name/Contact: Siew Huat Ng, Unit~~ Civil Inc. Project Address: 25642 Camino Del Avion. San Juan Capistrano. Calif_o_rnia, 92675 City Contact Person: Jeremy Hohnbaum. /11 order to expedite the review process ofyour project, please providetl your respouses explaining changes that have been applied in your project's document in the "Response" column of this RTC Matrix and include in the next submittal package. Spec. Section/ Item Reviewer's comment Response Dwg. Sheet# # First Review Title Page 1 F1:1h1i:e s1:1emittals te iael1:1ae i:e·risiea aate€s➔. Included. Owner's 1 Application numbers to be updated upon issue in future Certification submittals. INCLUDED UNDER SECOND REVIEW Numbers will be included when available. COMMENTS Owner's 2 Signature and Date are required in final Conceptual WQMP Certification prior to final approval. INCLUDED UNDER SECOND Signature will be included for final approval. REVIEW COMMENTS 1.0 -Discretionary 1 Update Permit/Application number upon issue and include in Permit(s) and Water future submittals. INCLUDED UNDER SECOND REVIEW Numbers will be included when available. Quality Conditions COMMENTS 1.0 -Discretionary IAel1:1ae statemeAts FegaFEliag tl:ie fellewiAg: Permit(s) and Water I. PFieF te iss1:1aAee et afl}' gFaEliAg eF euilEliAg f!eFmit, tl:ie Quality Conditions 2 Bflf!lieaet sl~all s1:1emit te the Gil:y a w:ateF Q1:10:lit,y MaAageFAeet PlaA P.VQMP~ fei: Fe•1iew aAEI Bf!J'lF8'>'al tl=lat Describe in Section I. fl:llf:ill5 FeEjl:liFeffieAts ehhe (;ity's Stl'SMP, aEIElfesses site design BM:Ps. iAeerJ:'leFates the 0:f!f!lisaele Re1:1t:ine Sauree ,., __ ,. __ ., ..... ,.,_ .1 n-.Kn-~ II. _, ., .. -· . -· . ···-· --·-·-· EXHIBIT A -APPENDIX 2 Spec. Section/ Item Reviewer's comment Response Dwg. Sheet# # tke laAg teFm apeFatiaA aRd maiAteRaRee Feei1:1iFemeRts fer tke stF1:1ct1:1Fal BMPs, iEleRti:f:ies the Fespemsible emit,' feF laAg teFm apeFatiaR a0d mai0te0aRee, a0d deseFibes tke meehaf!is1f! feF fl:IAE1i0g feF the laRg teFm epeFatiaA aAd maiAteRaAee ef stmetl:IFal BMPs. 1.0 -Discretionary Please include Final Resolution of Approval or Conditional Permit(s) and Water 3 use Permit as an Attachment to the WQMP for final Will include when available. Quality Conditions submittal. INCLUDED UNDER SECOND REVIEW COMMENTS 2.1 -General I Please iRolude legal descri13tieF1 efthe prnject lacatian (e.g., APN and tract number included. Conditions APN, let; tFaot, eto.). 2 .1 -General 2 Please idef!tif)· the 13laRning aFealeamm1:1Rity Rame ia the Planning area included in the description. Conditions NaFFati•,ie PFeject 9eseFi13tiaF1. 2.1 -General 3 Qise1:1ss 13at=IEiRg feF FesideRts af!d aey 13a1,eEi eeff!maA ai:eas, Residential parking and paved common areas Conditions ets, included. 2 .1 -General 4 Please deseFibe all laf!dseaped aFeas iR the NaFroti•,•e PFeject Landscape areas described. Conditions QeseFi13tieR. 2.1 -General 5 Please iAel1:1de whether eF Rat the 1:1re1:1eseEi J:Jfejest will No off-site improvements discussed. Conditions iRelHele any e-f+ site im13re¥emeF1ts. 2. I -General 6 Please iF1el1:1ele the tatal im1:1eF¥ie1:1s area aelEled eF re1:1laeeel as Info added. Conditions p&Ft e~tl:te 1:1rejeet iA the ~JarFati¥e cPFejeet 9essFif:ltiaA. 2.1 -General 7 Please iAeh:1ee i1:1stiAeatieA feF pFieFit,c pFejeot eeteFminatieA Justification included. Conditions iA tl~e ll-Janative PFejeet 9eseFi13ti0A. 2.2 -Post The west and East storm drain connect to the 30" Development l.J.lheFe dees the ,.,.,est a0d east staFffi dFain een0eet+ WheFe main line on the drive isle . A IO" outlet pipe Drainage 1 daes the maiAli0e eeRReet+ Hew eees the rnReff lea•,ie the from this main line conveys the flow to the Characteri sties site? The 1:1repaseEI elraiAage S)'Stem aiiel flaw patJi Reeds to existing basin at the Southeast corner of the site, be olaFified. where flow leaves the site via existing drain line onto Park Ave. Spec. Section/ Item Reviewer's comment Response Dwg. Sheet# # 3.1 -Site Conditions 1 Please include a-a eiEhibit snowing tke elEistin.g con.aitioA of Existing hydrology map added . the site. 3.1 -Site Conditions 2 Distance to San Juan Creek included. 3.1 -Site Conditions 3 Please iAch1de the fFactioA of the site is Cl:lffeAti)' de•,,eloped Description included. iA the SectioA ;; pFoject AaFFati• .. e. 3.1 -Site Conditions 4 Please descFiee Hie slo13es, the Faage of ele•,cati,oAs, asd Description included. teFFaiA ~•pe in. the SeeHoA ;; 13Fojeet naFffiti¥e. 3.1 -Site Conditions 5 Qisctiss ..,,,hetheF OF aot theFe is offsite flow the Ft!AS oAto the !3FOJ3e~•. Discussion included. 3.1 -Site Conditions 6 Please inelude if any 8*isting infrastF1:1cl:t!Fe is to remain iA Description included. 13Fo13osed de¥elepmeAt. 3 .1 -Site Conditions Please provide Geocon West Inc. geotechnical report as an 7 attachment to the WQMP as justification for infiltration Soil report attached . infeasibility of the project. INCLUDED UNDER SECOND REVIEW COMMENTS 3.1 -Site Conditions 8 Add thecpage F11:1,meeF feF the inJiltration eliseussioA in the Page number (Section 8.18, Page 35) added. Geoteehnieal re130Ft aAel iAeluele aft attachmeAt refeFeeee. 3.3 -Receiving I J:Rcluele map s!:iowing the 13FelEimity to reeei•;ing wateF boel)•. Map included in Attachm ent C. Waterbodies 3.3 -Receiving 2 Y13elate U1e ~QJ{el~ listings fer San Juafl GFeele to the most Listing updated. W aterbodies u13dated :a,n0,t2Q22 ;;Q~Ee~ listings. 3.3 -Receiving PeF the SGG +GQ SectioA ;Lu, this sectieA Reeds to Aaffie W aterbodies 3 the eliFect reeeii.,iAg wateF eoay feF the J3Fojeot site anel eael:i Text specifies the path of storm drain -San Juan subsequent wateF hody LtRtil Feaehing the oeean. Please Fe•;ise Creek -Pacific Ocean sectioA ;; .J telEt acc0Fdi0gl)'. 3.4 -Stormwater 1 Per the SOC TGD Section 2.3.4.5, primary pollutants of Pollutants of concern are any pollutants anticipated to be generated by the Table 3.4 revised. Concern project that have also been identified as causing impairment Spec. Section/ Item Reviewer's comment Response Dwg. Sheet# # of project receiving waters between the point of discharge from the project and the ocean. Please revise Table 3.4 accordingly. INCLUDED UNDER SECOND REVIEW COMMENTS 3.4 -Stormwater Per SOC TGD Section 4.4.4, where trash is identified as a Pollutants of primary pollutant of concern, BMPs must be designed to Concern 2 remove trash. Please include documentation that details how Each unit has trash bin and recycle bin. There is. the proposed structural BMP meets the trash requirements of a composite/food trash bin near the entrance. the Trash Provisions. INCLUDED UNDER SECOND REVIEW COMMENTS 3.5 -Hydrologic Please include a map or maps showing: Conditions of 1. Discharge location(s) from the site and all receiving storm Concern drains and waterbodies from the site to the ocean Hydrology Map included in Attachment C, I 2. Label each reach of all downstream waterbodies showing flow path/reach from discharge location to the Ocean. Exempted area from the hydro 3. Label areas identified in the WMAA as exempt from the modification requirements shown on the map. hydromodification requirements. INCLUDED UNDER SECOND REVIEW COMMENTS 3.5 -Hydrologic Please iReh:1ae tl=ie af)f1F0f!Fiat:e ma13(s~ iAel1:1aeel iA tl=ie l=G:9 2 Conditions of a1313eAeliioe N.+ if!eiieat:iAg the 13Fejeet leeatieA as jHstaieatieA Map included in Attachment C. Concern feF MyelfeFAeelifieat:ieA eM:eFA13tieA. 3 .6 -Critical Coarse Please iAel1:1el:e tl=ie a1313F8f1Fiate FAa19Es) iAelmieEI iA tl=ie +GB The critical course sediment provision does not 1 Sediment Yield a1313eaEihE l>t8 iAEiieatiag tl=ie 13Fejeet leeatieA as j~1stil=ieatieA apply to redevelopment of an existing Areas feF eFitieal eeHFSe seEiimeRt yielEi at=ea e1Eem13ti0R. development. 3 .6 -Critical Coarse l:f:".Uie FAap iA +GB a1313eAEliM N.8 iAEi:ieat:es 130teRtial eFitieal 2 Sediment Yield eeafS e seEi:imeAt yielel aFeas, thefl J:lF8't1iEie aee1:1FReAtati0R ef Same as above. Areas wl'letl=ieF these aFe aerual eFitieal eearse seeimest yield ai:eas. 4.1 -Drainage Please include drainage map exhibit(s) which include: Drainage/site map and landscape map included in Management Area Attachment C. There are two drainage areas, but Delineation 1 1. Areas of potential pollutant generation one OMA (onsite area only). The offsite (B) does 2. Impervious and pervious areas not drain onsite. Runoff of Subarea A all drains to the modular wetland. Runoff goes through Spec. Section/ Item Reviewer's comment Response Dwg. Sheet# # In addition, please show the drainage boundary for the area curb gutter or ditches, inlets and storm drain. draining to the Modular Wetland. The ditches do not go to Water in the storm drain is routed to the the Modular Wetland. The project site needs to be broken up diversion structure, where low flow goes to the into each area that drains to a different location. It cannot all modular wetland, high flow bypasses. be one OMA if does not all drain to the modular wetland. INCLUDED UNDER SECOND REVIEW COMMENTS 4.1 -Drainage Runoff near public street does not drain onsite. Management Area Describe how the site was di1t·ided iAto DMAs aRd how 'BMP All onsite runoff drains via storm drain to the Delineation 2 plaeeFHeAt was selected. low point at the rear of the site, where BMP is placed. 4.1 -Drainage 3 Please include any relevant support (e.g., site investigations, Grading plan included showing the site drains Management Area etc.) which influenced the siting of the structural BMPs. Delineation INCLUDED UNDER SECOND REVIEW COMMENTS towards the rear of the site. 4.1 -Drainage Include site investigation report/studies relevant to feasibility Soil report shows the site has limited infiltration Management Area 4 rate, thus infiltration is not feasible. Landscape Delineation determinations (geotechnical report). INCLUDED UNDER plan shows the site does not have much water SECOND REVIEW COMMENTS demand for recycle and reuse. 4.2 -Overall Site Please iAoh:lde FHsre details as to how site desigA 'BMPs were Design BMPs I iffiplemeHted tlue1::1gho1::1t the desigR of: the prejeet. +he felle•,viflg site desigR meas1::1res ele Aet h0¥e s13eeifie icm13lemeAtatieA iAfermat=ieA: DiseeAAeet lm13er1t1is1::15 Area5, :r:irese013i:eg, Water effieieAt baAdseapiHg. 4.3 -Drainage Please elaF:i~• that all the ntAoff EFOB'I tl:1:e site gees to the The onsite runoff drains along gutters and Management Area I ditches, and is picked up by inlets and area drains Characteristics and sterm elraiA systeFB leael.iAg to u~e 1fl0Eil::l:lar 1weUa-F1Ei. Jf: Aet, and conveyed to storm drain system. The storm Site Design BMPs theA Hiere aeees ts be sel"arate DMAs. drain leads the flow to the modular wetland. 4.3 -Drainage 2 Please include how site design concepts were considered and Details of the design concepts are included in the Management Area incorporated into the project plans in the project narrative in narrative. Spec. Section/ Item Reviewer's comment Response Dwg. Sheet# # Characteristics and Section 4.3.1. INCLUDED UNDER SECOND REVIEW Site Design BMPs COMMENTS 4.3 -Drainage Management Area 2 Please iAchuie whether there is a aemaAa fer haP1estea Rain harvest feasibility included in the narrative. Characteristics and stormwater, aria if so, ealm:llate afla iAcluae the aemafla. Site Design BMPs 4.4 -Source Control Re•,•ie•,y aAa eAsl:lre all the eorreet sol:lrce eoAtrol BMPs are BMPs selecteEI iA U1e taele iA SeetioA 4 .4. For ei'Eam13le, is seems as 1 Narrative included fo r applicable and non-if loaai-Rg aoelEs ,,,,,01:1la ROt ee a1313lieaale. AEla a erief applicable source control BMPs. Aarrati'le cleserieiAg how eaeh iAcluclecl souree eoAtrol BMPs wi+I ee iffl13leffieHtea. 4.4 -Source Control 2 Eas1:1re the Source Controls seleeteEI in the re13ort are listed Source control listed on the WQMP site map. BMPs SR-tile site ma13, aRa ,,,ice \'ersa. 5.0 -Low Impact The modular wetland needs to be designed to meet the The design of the modular wetland follows these Development BMPs following requirements in the TGD: 1) Section 4.6 requirements. 2) Fact Sheet BI0-7 Per the OSC TGD (12-21-2018) Section 2.5.1, 3) Appendix Section 111 .3 .3 page 2-42, Third Priority Biotreatment with Negligible Retention, 1) maximize HSC 2) size 1 4) Appendix Section 111.7 BMPs to treat 1.5 times the DCV. 5) SOC-I Worksheet 6) Appendix Xl I The calculation and description that the The modular wetland can only be considered an LID BMP if proposed Modular Wetland provides capacity it is designed to retain more than 75% of the DCV in the greater than 1.5 times the DCV (See Attachment ponding and pore space. It also needs to be shown to treat the D). project's pollutants of concern. INCLUDED UNDER SECOND REVIEW COMMENTS 5.0 -Low Impact 2 I~ the QM As ellaAge 13er SeetioR 4 J) COfflBJeRts, then eaell The offsite drainage area does not drain to the Development BMPs site but to the public right of way, so is not adclitioAal 9MA ,..,.m Reed to be aiseussecl iR this seetieR. treated. Spec. Section/ Item Reviewer's comment Response Dwg. Sheet# # 5.0 -Low Impact 3 Please include justification for why no HSCs were HSC is not included to the design. Proposed Development BMPs implemented into the design of the project. INCLUDED BMP has enough capacity to treat DCQ and UNDER SECOND REVIEW COMMENTS l.5xDCV. 5.0 -Low Impact WoFIEsl=ieet 9, as pFeseAteEI ice AppenEliM 9 , has FefeFeAees to Development BMPs WoFIEsheet A Enet iRelt1Eleel ie sHemittal) aeEI AeeEls to ee Worksheet D is included in Attachment D. 4 iAelt1eleel. Both seetioes efthe St1ppefl:iAg Ga!eulatiees 0:Fe left elaAk ie l,lJeFIEsheet Q as well aed eeeEI to ee eoffipleted Worksheet A is not as HSC is not included. to 0:Elequately justify the preseAted ealeulatieAs. Update if HSGs aFe ieelHded. 5.0 -Low Impact No justification given for the exclusion ofHSCs. Please HSC is not included in the design. Proposed Development BMPs 5 adequately justify why HSCs were excluded from the project BMP has enough capacity to treat DCQ and design. INCLUDED UNDER SECOND REVIEW l .5xDCV description included. DMA is not self- COMMENTS retaining. HSC is not included. 5.0 -Low Impact Please iAeh1de whetheF the QMA is self Fetaieieg oaee 6 Development BMPs ereelits ft:oFA the HSGs at=e pl'e•;ided and iAelHded iA the More description included. st1eFAi~I. Ypdate iH-ISGs aFe iAelHdeEI. 5.0 -Low Impact Please pre¥iele adeqHate j~1st::ifieatie0 fer kew the modul.aF Development BMPs 7 wetlaAd system was determieea to be the eest stoFAH¥ater The site consists of high density multi-family maeageFAeAt approaeh fer U1is pFejeet. Be as Eletailed as units. pessiele as reteetien aAd inl'iltJ:atioA are the preferred methods fer eoffipliaeee. 5.0 -Low Impact Space constraints are referenced to justify using the MWS in Development BMPs 8 lieu of infiltration/retention. Please describe why space Calculation sheets and backup info provided in constraints could not be mitigated in the site design. Attachment D. INCLUDED UNDER SECOND REVIEW COMMENTS 5.0 -Low Impact +he-taele ia SeetioA 5.'.2 pFeseAts 't'alHes with Re ealet1latioes Development BMPs or refeFeeee to werlEsheet.lealst:ilatieA jt:tstifieatioA. Please 9 prnvide adequatejHstifieatioA a:nd refereAees so Feviewer eaA Sheet updated. BMP capacity is confirmed for eheek aeet:trney of ealeulatioas. treatment flow rate and volume in the narrative. 121ease pro11ide all eaelECHp ealeHlatioAs, eeiuatioAs aBd preseet '.-1--:--1 -'"--L•----.: ,------.1 .1. -L --1 J:--.. ..... ... ---,._ .. ._ ---·-- Spec. Section/ Item Reviewer's comment Response Dwg. Sheet# # accH-!'acy anel cempleteness. If eale1:1lat:iens 0:Fe i:,resented elsewheFe iA lke s1:1emittal, please pfe:Yiele FefefeRee. See ilie geAefal cemment fer SeetieA !i.G te eleteFffliHe what type ef ca:lel:dat:ieas aAd eaelHtp aeeds te ee pFe•rieled iA effieF feF the re0vie•.¥er te determine if the LID BMP meets the Feei1::1iremeAts ef: the +GD. 5.0 -Low Impact Please 1::1pelate the elesigA eFiteria en the Eietai I sheet :te nete Development BMPs 10 the FeEj1:1ireel treatment f:10\11 rate aaEi ,,,ell:lme reteatiea Sheet updated. BMP capacity is confirmed for FeEJ1::1ireel. GentiFm in the re130Ft Aa:rFati•,•e t:bat ttiis BMP ean treatment flow rate and voL11ne in the narrative. aceemmeaate the reEjHired treatment f:1ew rate and the reteatiea 'relHme. 6.0 -Exemptions from hydromodification standards are pending Hydromodification 1 the applicant provide justification for such exemptions as Map from TGD Appendix N included in BMPs outlined in comments for Section 3. See TGD Appendix N for appropriate maps to be provided in next submittal. Attachment C. INCLUDED UNDER SECOND REVIEW COMMENTS 7.0 -Educational It appears that there are more educational materials that Materials Index 1 should be provided for homeowners. Please review the list Additional educational material included. again and check all that are potentially applicable. INCLUDED UNDER SECOND REVIEW COMMENTS Attachments l All required attachments and information to be included in the Final WQMP. INCLUDED UNDER SECOND Will provide upon final submittal. REVIEW COMMENTS Second Review Owner's 1 Application numbers to be updated upon issue in future Certification submittals. Owner's 2 Signature and Date are required in final Conceptual WQMP Certification prior to final approval. Spec. Section/ Item Reviewer's comment Response Dwg. Sheet# # 1.0 -Discretionary 1 Update Permit/Application number upon issue and include in Permit(s) and Water Quality Conditions future submittals. 1.0 -Discretionary 1 Once available, please include Final Resolution of Approval Permit(s) and Water or Conditional use Permit as an Attachment to he WQMP for Quality Conditions final submittal. 3.1 -Site Conditions 1 Please include a reference within the text to the existing hydrology map that you've included. 3 .1 -Site Conditions Please include description if any existing infrastructure 2 (utilities, drainage infrastructure, etc.), aside from the house, that are to remain in the proposed development. If none, please state this specifically. 3.1 -Site Conditions 3 Please include the letter of the attachment ("E") when referencing the attachment containing the Geocon West geotechnical report in the text. 3.1 -Site Conditions Please attach the Geocon West geotechnical report pdfto 4 Attachment E of the WQMP document for the final submittal. The City will want a complete report for their records. 3.1 -Site Conditions Identify any known Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) 5 and Areas of Special Biological Significance (ASBSs) within the vicinity and their proximity to the project or state that none exist. 3.3 -Receiving 1 Please include a reference in the text to the proximity to W aterbodies receiving water body map in Attachment C. 3 .3 -Receiving The list of receiving waterbodies should include all 303(d) W aterbodies 2 listed impaired waterbodies downstream of the project site and their associated pollutants, which includes San Juan Creek (mouth). Spec. Section/ Item Reviewer's comment Response Dwg. Sheet# # 3.4-Stormwater The pollutants in Table 3 .4 should reflect the categorizations Pollutants of in SOC TGD Section 2.3.4.5, copied below. Please update Concern this table accordingly. Primary Pollutants of Concern are any pollutants anticipated to be generated by the project using Table 2-4 that have also I been identified as causing impairment of project receiving waters (Table 2-6) or for which a TMDLs is in place (Table 2-7) Other pollutants of concern are those pollutants anticipated to be generated by the project using Table 2-4 that have not been identified as causing impairment in the project's receiving waters. 3.4-Stormwater Comment contingent upon trash being a primary Pollutants of pollutant of concern: Per SOC TGD Section 4.4.4, where Concern 2 trash is identified as a primary pollutant of concern, BMPs must be designed to remove trash that is 5 millimeters and greater. The source control measures (ie. trash bins, etc.) are not sufficient. Please include documentation that details how the proposed structural BMP meets these requirements. 3.5 -Hydrologic Please include a reference and description to the Hydrology Conditions of I Map located in Attachment C in the text of this section. Concern Please add Titles to the different maps, legends, and callouts as necessary to let the reader know what the map is showing. 4.1 -Drainage Please reference the drainage/site map included in Appendix Management Area C in the text. Please also discuss the parkway drain #2 shown Delineation I on the map and the runoff this pipe collects. Why is it not being treated? From the information provided, the reviewer interprets it as a wet well that is collecting ground water and pumping it up and draining it into the street. Spec. Section/ Item Reviewer's comment Response Dwg. Sheet# # 4.1 -Drainage Please include reference to relevant support (e.g. Geotech Management Area 2 Report.) which influenced the feasibility of and the siting of Delineation the structural BMP within the text, as well as a description in the narrative. 4.3 -Drainage Please include how site design concepts were considered and Management Area 1 Characteristics and incorporated into the project plans in the project narrative in Site Design BMPs Section 3.4.1. 5.0 -Low Impact I Please include a textual reference to the Attachment that Development BMPs includes all supporting calculations and worksheets for the proprietary BMP. 5.0 -Low Impact This section references Appendix D to size the Modular Development BMPs Wetland System BMP using Worksheet D, which is from an 2 outdated version of the TGD from 12-20-2013. Ensure that the submittal is referencing and using worksheets from latest version of the TGD from 12/21 /2018 located here. Worksheet 9 should be used to size the compact biofiltration BMP. 5.0 -Low Impact According to SOC TGD-12/21/2018 (Pg. 4-24), Development BMPs in order to use proprietary treatment BMPs with no volume reduction in lieu of non-proprietary BMP with partial infiltration, the developer must prove: a) the site has been designed per criteria in Section 4.2.4.1, and demonstrate that the non-proprietary device would 3 require more size than is available. Consideration must be given to the reduction of size required given the use of HSCs. b) If the result is that the space is less than can support a non- proprietary BMP within acceptable design assumptions, proprietary BMPs would be preferable, and subject to acceptance criteria of Appendix J. Spec. Section/ Item Reviewer's comment Response Dwg. Sheet# # Please address these requirements in the narrative, and be sure to include the relevant justifications/calculations in the referenced Appendix to address the points above. 5.0 -Low Impact Please describe the credit taken towards DCV retention for Development BMPs the HSCs and include calculations and worksheets, as 4 needed. State whether the DMA is self-retaining after credit from the hydro logic source controls. If no credit is being taken for HSCs, then please provide a statement in Section 5 .1 .1 discussing why HS Cs could not feasibly be implemented. 5.0 -Low Impact Please be sure to include rationale within the narrative, Development BMPs 6 corresponding to the requirements outlined in Section 5.0 Item 3 above, as to why space constraints could not be mitigated in the site design. 5.0 -Low Impact Please provide a reference in the text of Section 5.2, directing Development BMPs 7 the reviewer to the attachment containing the background calculations for the results displayed in the Table. In this attachment be sure to provide the relevant equations and methodology so the reviewer can easily follow along. 6.0-In Appendix C, include the San Juan Capistrano Exemption Hydromodification 1 Map from TGD Appendix N that shows where the site is and BMPs whether it is exempt from hydromodification requirements. 7.0 -Educational Ensure that only applicable educational materials that should Materials Index 1 be provided for homeowners are included in the Section 7 table, and that the educational materials in the Section 7 table and those included in Attachment A align. Attachments 1 All required attachments and information to be included in the Final WQMP as commented on above. ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY Fire Prevention Department P. 0. Box 57115, Irvine, CA 916/9-7115 • l Fire Authority Road, Irvine, CA 92602 Planning and Development Services• www.ocfa.org • (714) 573-6100 I Fax (714) 368-8843 Date: May 6, 2024 Laura Stokes Page 1 of 1 To: City of San Juan Capistrano From: Rich Swanson, Fire Prevention Analyst City Reference #AC 23-008 Subject: OCFA Service Request SR #181111 Camino Twelve 25642 Camino Del Avian San Juan Capistrano, CA Service Code: PR105 Site Development Review The OCFA has reviewed the proposed project concept and based on this initial assessment the project appears to be capable of complying with current code requirements. Contingent upon approval of the CUP by the Planning DepartmenUPlanning Commission, the conditions listed below are applicable to this project; please provide them in the resolution issued to the applicant. If you need additional information or clarification, please contact me by phone or email: (714) 573-6123, richswanson@ocfa.org. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Plan Submittal: The applicant or responsible party shall submit the plan(s) listed below to the Orange County Fire Authority for review. Approval shall be obtained on each plan prior to the event specified. Prior to OCFA clearance of a final map or issuance of a precise grading permit or a building permit, if a grading permit is not required: • fire master plan (service code PR145) • The fire master plan shall indicate that both buildings will be built as townhouses per the California Residential Code (CRC), and each unit will be separated with double-wall construction, per the CRC. • All plans shall match the retaining wall and fire lane configuration shown on Sheet F2 of the development review plan set (OCFA SR#181111 ). Retaining wall and fire lane configurations shown on other sheets are not acceptable. Prior to issuance of a building permit: • fire sprinkler system (service codes PR405) Temporary/Final Occupancy Inspections: Prior to issuance of temporary or final certificate of occupancy, all OCFA inspections shall be completed to the satisfaction of the OCFA inspector and be in substantial compliance with codes and standards applicable to the project and commensurate with the type of occupancy (temporary or final) requested. Inspections shall be scheduled at least five days in advance by calling OCFA Inspection Scheduling at 714-573-6150. Lumber-drop Inspection: After installation of required fire access roadways and hydrants, the applicant shall receive clearance from the OCFA prior to bringing combustible building materials on-site. Call OCFA Inspection Scheduling at 714-573-6150 with the Service Request number of the approved fire master plan at least five days in advance to schedule the lumber drop inspection. Serving the Cities of: Aliso Viejo • Buena Park • Cypress • Dana Point • Garden Grove • Irvine • Laguna Hills • Laguna Niguel • Laguna Woods Lake Forest• La Palma• Los Alamitos • Mission Viejo • Rancho Santa Margarita •San Clemente • San Juan Capistrano • Santa Ana Seal Beach• Stanton• Tustin• Villa Park• Westminster• Yorba Linda• and Unincorporated Areas of Orange County EXHIBIT A -APPENDIX 3 > I--0::: 0 :c I-::::, <( w 0::: -LL > I-z ::::, 0 0 w (!) z ~ 0 z <( ..J a.. n:: w I-en <( :E w 0::: -LL c.. ~ ~ (/) <( LL u 0 c.. <( ~ >-1-z u > en UJ I-0 z z <( ....J c.. 0:: UJ I-en <( ~ UJ er:'. u::: a 0:: <( a z <( I-en <( LL u 0 mm 5'5535 . . . :-.. <::f;.~ !.L9Z6 'f~a~"fml~Jtl'I~;~.~~~ 3J\73Ml ONIL'\l\t:::> :c <J) -LL / ' / / I -=~ ';"\✓ /1 ••• ,,11·' . ''\\ u / \ . . . \;-, I ,·•· l=_t ., .: \• •• ! ' • • I / /I /, 'i /// I ~I ,,, ; ! 0 / •/. :--l ' I '_ .. __ ..,. I I ' -A?N:658-491-01 ----------- .._PN: 668-491-02 I. -~!!!~--------,- ~fU-•Jt .. (IJ 'TRACT 15J01 ;------------ ' 1 .4.PN: 666-01-04 I l- '-. ---~----PROP[IITYLrNEy-J ____ _ o::\-~~-:----------- ' I ... ', """· Holr4.,-,,.,, I ' I 6&!H91-oe '-'--TRACT 15301 I I APN: 668-~91-05 I I I ','-......_ I ,, I '·', I -_ _;_c-:.--=------- \ ---_I ) / ...... ' FIRE ACCESS SITE PLAN SCALE 1",20 ~ _.,_ I -:--- <----- ---------- I SCALE: l" ~20• ~ 0 20 ◄Cl PARK AVENUE 25642 CDA, LLC ae11◄2 ~MU,10 J:111.:L AVION !IAN JUAN C.U"l,ifP,ANO, CA 11211711 60 '"'-- ""--.... __ !>'l~oil• LEGEND: ------PIIDPDllY LINE / BCUNOAIIY ------150' HOSE PULL F"IIOU PUBLIC SlREET (CAI.IINO DEL AVION) ,u .... wo•-···••H••·---250' HOSE PULL fROM PUBLIC STREET (DEL OBISPO) REDCURB-"NOPARKINC" V ~ nu. ~,-o"",,i11 KEY NOTES: 0) P£0ESTRIAN SCCURITY Aca:SS CAT£ Y-0" 11110£ WITH KNOK 801( TIIA.~SfORMER @ @ CONCRETE WAUCWAY, ◄'-0" W,D[ I.IINIUUl.l,UHL[SSNOTEO G) NOPARKINCSICN @ PUBLICSTREETTO SrnVE ASFlll[l.4.NE BUILDING DATA TABLE_: BlJILDlt.'GAR[,.: auI1.011,u:; ,, 8UII.DUIC2' J~,970 SF H,3JO SF TYPC of cossmucnOH: v-a SPRiNKLEA SYSTEMS: M~'•f III-Joc:a.-.~.,.,lrdlt'11.1.JO~tl!t.P"t\"tWIIS ATTACHMENT 2 Rr• lrib11u Pl1q SYtim~t,1 Clled.lbt f-'r'o""'I ~~:-!:;~ .. .:-,_.-w:;;-c.-.wi.... .... , ............. _~ (;~•-N'-'11\CUP,. .. ..,....,_"'M'~' f....,.-~fl.-U..,...,_..__~ lt,Y•• s .. ""'"'1ocrArn.,,i:,,1,i,~-••~ 11(\111,,,.,__. .. .,. •• .,., .. .-_..~ ~.,..,....,....,,,._lOl~..c,,p......,,1..,.,..,.......,plM,lilY•• l.'lallatro,..,oUl'e.l\oll>On~on~.,,, 0Y9" !l"IQ1•"\a,;o,1..,,i,..,_ • ~{.(.oO ... 'IP"'") Sl'>r,i...,.,e.,.,~n1111ruc,"n,...,.i:t,;,r,r""""'"11~"'"P<J"••!1 >GV1•• ~ .. tirJa•~iJ~'IJf'L>tl1>""'U .. .n OV ... lidk,11,r,,,.....,.,1,,,_,..,..,,,"',-.,,.,.,.,.,.,., ~~E~~~VOAANtS ___________________ _ WalOlr;<>l""l4¥'°""''""~'"l<>Clo<IOp-o>1Cloo? □Vu ll"<i,.,l)'l,Jloo11□~100U'l.l<,l,.,__,,, /Ul,~11,..iJ,lo::6'J<lit...,...,,ro,~..,..,pi_., )IVu, "'"n,..,,on1,....,.-.·11•:o:•Gr,..,CFC:ol,pr,ar,:luC1 >GVn :,((IU@'f9::"°"'!A.n E>loN<il.._ __ ............. .., .. _ty_,,,.,.1 .... ,, lllV•• 1...,.""'l,aiu--trdrooa...s_J.,_.,cn...,fU"> :iiiv .. u, .. .,,,.,. ... ~.....,.,-1so,,...N1-~• av., a...,_,,..........,.. XHoio~~-"•• ~'''""""""""'-"°°""...,'"~""? ~"" ow,.,,.....,..,.."" W..o.-._......,.p..,.,_I0,_...,_7 )11101 -•,wJula1«..,(ll->1ll\,,!l'-... """""'""°""'""pla,t7 :Hl'WU a ... ,.,i;.,_ .... ,. ., .... ,.. .... , llo,du,,<>10,0-,..~,..,.,,...,...,_,l,gld d-"''""""''' "'"•• tJN'l,(> .. ,--,..r ... "'11•.....,,,___,, Locall:W1olH<hF•tL""o-'IOP.,.."Q1jgrl.,,_,,7 (!'to,:l;iNll,1""'""""'""'.>nll r ............... "'"...,.,""O•oci...J•l•""'"'"'""'"'~·••oo' (!V ... H'11A""', ... ,.,,, ... .,,..,.., __ , D<o""'IJ•ol•od,uM~NoPJ•••'l ol'\l/1,aco """'P'-1 :i,i:v,,. tJN'"1._.,..,..,.,.o,Lll,•oai~"'"' "10 ... gu,., ,__,, ,...,~,.,._~ ko _.,,dog-OW>IJ.-;I .. "'°""" o, •loor<:7 c"'"""'"''""''""colh:r_.,,.Ol'l><'ra<l'Cf"""'~-.-...-""""' Mlll""'•"""•g,....1 .... "NOr~ • .,.,.,,,od"I !Vla.bo.o-.U.,-i.n,,.,r,c,-,.,.,p:.u-o,7 OCF,.y-.......,_..u•.-~,..........._..,.,p1,_.7 KVu ov ... lil'-''"''"'~··"'-•<J· tJYN. .l!IN'"'"'""''°'«;o,.,....,,__,, □Vo, lilN'Alf;o....,.,fl)l",._I 11:Vt, 0N'"'"'~~I av ... ,:,., ... ....,~"'--"' NJ.l\l<o:-,r>11tll<.I..._O_o,o7 QVn .... ,.,...,_ ... =..:~=:=~==~· 8!~ ~~,.,~l>...,_,,.,J ~= T--~~~"4<,Jbl:.O"'"""~•o>"Wr,:.o,? QYf-,.111 12RCSUHCl5 BU01<Mg1•1s·1a~,--r.,.,,<.>l\odQ111 •O n N"'•--~ PA,l,.,,..on!otumeniltOo,-7 )()ofQII .. ,...,.,,,"""..,.. p,~~...,lt<l••~~~aa:.,.-:,,•;;;;,-:!:,".!'~, Q'1-1 N~ HO,. f1',.,.....,,,..,.-,,~t,,,..:-low..,._.,.,,.,,.,......,4'f • ATTACHMENT 3 :::"'.;:;:•:,:;;,;:m=:,~":~!°"""." UNITED CIVIL, INC. ~:)1◄1 AGOUffA ROAD surrE :115 AGOURA HILLS. CA 91301 PH fll1!)707-1!548 FAX 1a1e) 101..s~-49 FIRE ACCESS PLAN TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 19310 25642 CAM/NO DEL AVION SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CA 92675 S11Itt ., 2 ~ !~Ji ,r~ ~ OCFA WATER AVAILABILITY FORM SECTION A: To bt com~•t•d by c:u,tomer Proiti:I NMlfl ~~~_i".!9 __ T_l'!E\'!°!= __ _ P,u1eclA.<ldreH 25542 cA1,m,10 OCL AVION ---C~y. s.-.N JUA~ A1,oheor11Priona11r_a1a_um~~lliO ____ Fa~• L_ __ / ____ _ l\nl~d1:>ioe•!bt;WoJ1no s.~10 rr': c011111ruc11:in1ype?1""--1ffiB~~ ~ .... .....,... •• ,...,._Wf,,1,-.,ri-•-A ~ SECTION B To bo c:ompl,t1i, by local woJter dap.tmo1111dl111kt t.ltt.fltll'Nf~ptO-.fN,....,.OC,: .. W~le• Oer~r11nen1/C1~1rct r,~,,____.,., __ ,,,,,.__ i,t .... ~,woeimd~•--------------- ~ ......... ft~ -----fiJ:11----11-.u "=·~-!.:'..... .. fl-.... -....... _..-~~~ ..... -, ...... -~:.,..,!;LB 11.0WnilTRUULts NU~.._.,.,.....,..,__,.,_IUI'·~· I 11:r.,,11•-··-·· ,-_l•~ .. ·-· .. 1 011..,., .. now: .. J Flow cl It'd al 20 pal: ·a .. ---·--··-----···-··-··"-···-·" -1 1 ..... Qll~-•llllt1«$1■"NllllilWI.,_.....,.....,.,..~~--~ ~~pnUlll"II .. ·V-ll;ITK:P"ln.n ~ .._--..Jai,n-"' ........ ~.... ,.. I have ...,_,,~UICI 11tul/~1 n,V\6\1,~ 1r,,,, w.o1.,-flew ontornalion and t.y ptrsonal ~~ fl'lcllot M-1111 Qb)eN•llme..-rt,ry ll\;ll lhoolbow inlom,,11,o,1 ,1 CU'l'od Comp.inylAgtllC'f ---------, .. 0• L------ N)AtOotlllUOOH (~A.tc.:.l' ..... ..,., C(11,,.,..,;'NIH0 n ;),.._,_,,i<G<.o ---~, ..... ,, .. :,..,. 5onta. Mqugauiro Water, Dlstulct 11.1: ►11cllowle>1for!lo(,.11(.o::nooL'tl,\"l'tl:.JnJ...,,("~•..,.J"" P~''"'" '"•""'' 1h.-SJo'"J.l"''-'"'-'Wn,~ ll,lfn<l1'--.1orn..-J~fin: n,, .. i,,,,1,~,,,.., l11 ~H ,~-v !,'<,71 ,..,..,...,. r,-Jco~•• •• S...n i. .. ~ C-•ro"'•"" .,,.,ic,.,e ~n•,.: l',e,,un: II .,JwlfTc-,urc U•••••••tL•ll'rc.,un· l',h~ l'r,.,,ur, Fh.w : \ ;~ ~.~~~l••"•lhdo•Tu."'1 1•1 l'~I 11., I'~! ~: P~I 1/l'lll G,\I l'k•'-1 t,.., ..J,,-cJ •h..l •I.-!OfO~omi; .-.J..:, ~.r: lul (.uloh.i,,. ol ,b,.· d.lc -".J "'-"''°" ....,,"\I ..i\J u. •l>~J•-~ ·~ ,1 ... ~'""""' h...t<I "" •)l""l<>;i ... I'-'\ ............. ~ ...... 1111~1 rrrn, l~IOII l!\Tl/lt.\l,\llt1-.;~1 N:RIV\FSo,L\ Ai.OSI.IT lt-"TtNOI 011111 1.~~1/\'< I ,11 111:ILOISC;l•I kMITS 1• )'"'" ... 1;,JJ,,,.,..J ,..r,.,,..., • .,.rk,...e<-..,11,(I n1t • ,~...,•• r,-:o~,, m'ld~••m ~ • .:, .... ➔, s1,JA\l-\ll6,\IHl1\\\,\UKUISIMlll --, .... ~...:U•- "c,\l,~~••\I ,,,.1,,.,. 1•."1l•t '" •~•-,,I• •Iv<-•'-'"' :,,, ,.,, •, ,;._.._. ... ...... . -·--· 25642 CDA, LLC SCALE: 1" = 50' a lltl.U CAW111to on. A.'4/t.O,,. ..e-t M.o,l .¥'1J,.,._ GUl'lfl!ll,rJ,10. CA•i.•'• 0 SO 100 LSD ... , __ om __ oti.n; __ Gt&ib I\Nl/rl~t, • FIRE HYDRANT SITE PLAN SCALE 1",50 UNITED CIVIL, INC. J0141 AGOURA ROAD, SUITE 215 AGOURA HILLS CA 91]01 PH [818)707-8648 FAX!818)707-66'19 J I FIRE MASTER PLAN TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 19310 1~ 25642 CAMINO DEL AVION ~ SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CA 92675 F3 ~ SHEET J OF J SHEET ~