Loading...
PC Resolution-23-05-24-02PC RESOLUTION NO. 23-05-24-02 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP (TPM) 22-001 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP (TPM) 22-001, TO ALLOW THE SUBDIVISION OF PARCEL 16 OF PARCEL MAP 79-856, A 6.27-ACRE PARCEL, ADDRESSED AS 31654 RANCHO VIEJO ROAD (APN 666-261-14), INTO THREE PARCELS: 3.72- ACRE PARCEL 1; 2.19-ACRE PARCEL 2; AND .36-ACRE PARCEL 3, AND FINDING THAT SAID ACTION IS EXEMPT FROM CEQA REVIEW PURSUANT TO STATE CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15315. (APPLICANT: RYAN WAUFLE, PASCO LARET SUITER & ASSOCIATES) WHEREAS, Ryan Waufle, Pasco Laret Suiter & Associates, 27127 Calle Arroyo, #1904, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 (the "Applicant"), has requested approval of Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) 22-001, a request to allow the subdivision of Parcel 16 of Parcel Map 79-856, a 6.27-acre parcel, addressed as 31654 Rancho Viejo Road (APN 666-261-14 ), into three parcels: 3. 72-acre Parcel 1; 2.19-acre Parcel 2; and .36-acre Parcel 3 (the "Project"). The subdivision is being pursued for financial purposes and there are no physical improvements proposed on the newly created parcels; and WHEREAS, the Property, generally located on the south side of Ortega Highway between Rancho Viejo Road and La Novia Avenue, within an existing commercial center known as the Ortega Village Center, has a General Plan Land Use Designation of Neighborhood Commercial and a Zoning Designation of Planned Community, governed by Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP) 78-01; and WHEREAS, Ortega Village Retail, LLC, 31654 Rancho Viejo Road, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675, are the owners of the real property located at 31654 Rancho Viejo Road (APN 666-261-14) (the "Property"); and WHEREAS , the proposed Project at the Property has been processed pursuant to Section 9-2.301, Development Review of the Land Use Code; and WHEREAS, the City's Environmental Administrator has reviewed the Project and recommends that the Planning Commission find that the Project is categorically exempt from further review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines 14 California Code of Regulations Section 15315, Minor Land Divisions (Class 15). Here, the entire Project is exempt per Section 15315 because the Project is a division of commercially zoned property into four or fewer parcels, the subdivision is in conformance with the City of San Juan Capistrano General Plan and zoning code, no variances or exceptions are required, all required services and access to the parcel are available, the parcel was not involved in a division of a larger parcel within the previous 2 years, and the parcel does not have an average slope greater than 20 percent. Lastly, none of the exceptions to the use of categorical exemptions identified in State CEQA Guidelines section 15300.2 apply. The project site is not located in a particularly sensitive PC Resolution 23-05-24-02 2 May 24, 2023 environment, there is no potential for cumulative impacts from successive projects in the same location, there are no unusual circumstances, the project is not located within an officially designated scenic highway, there is no record of hazardous waste on the property, and the project has no potential to impact historic resources. If the Project receives final approval, a Notice of Exemption would be filed with the County Recorder's Office within 5 days of such approval; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered the Environmental Administrator's determination pursuant to Section 15051 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has considered all Project environmental documentation; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a duly-noticed public hearing on May 24, 2023, pursuant to San Juan Capistrano Municipal Code Section 9- 2.302. The Planning Commission has considered all public testimony on the proposed Project and all relevant public comments and all documents and evidence submitted, including but not limited to the staff report, attachments, and materials submitted by the Applicant; and WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of San Juan Capistrano does hereby recommend that the City Council find the Project exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15315, Class 15 (Minor Land Division). The Project involves the division of commercial property into four or fewer parcels and is in conformance with the City of San Juan Capistrano General Plan and Land Use Code. No variances or exceptions are required, all required services and access to the parcel are available, the parcel was not involved in a division of a larger parcel within the previous 2 years, and the parcel does not have an average slope greater than 20 percent. Further, none of the exceptions to the use of categorical exemptions identified in State CEQA Guidelines section 15300.2 apply. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of San Juan Capistrano does hereby recommend City Council approval based upon the following findings pursuant to Municipal Code Section 9-4.223 (a) of Title 9, Land Use Code of the City of San Juan Capistrano with respect to Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) 22-001, subject to the conditions of approval identified in Exhibit A attached to this Resolution and incorporated herein by reference: 1. The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan and the Ortega Planned Community Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP 78-01 ). The proposed Tentative Parcel Map would not change the existing General Plan Land Use Designation for the newly created parcels; furthermore, the newly created parcels would comply with the minimum lot size requirement stipulated within CDP 78-01. 2. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan and the Ortega Planned Community Comprehensive Development PC Resolution 23-05-24-02 3 May 24, 2023 Plan (CDP 78-01) because the proposed Tentative Parcel Map is for financing purposes and does not have a related project or proposed improvements; furthermore, the newly created parcels would comply with the minimum lot size requirement stipulated with CDP 78-01. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development because the proposed Tentative Parcel Map is for financing purposes and does not have a related project or proposed improvements. Furthermore, the site was previously developed, and the physical suitability of the site was determined to be achieved. 4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development because the proposed Tentative Parcel Map is for financing purposes and does not have a related project or proposed improvements, nor an increase to the existing density. Furthermore, the site was previously developed and the physical suitability of the existing density for the site was determined to be achieved. 5. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because the proposed Tentative Parcel Map is not located within or adjacent to an area that contains wildlife or habitat. Further, the proposed Tentative Parcel Map is for financing purposes and does not have a related project or proposed improvements; therefore, compliance with this finding is achieved due to the fact that the Tentative Parcel Map does not have an associated project or any additional proposed improvements to the property resulting in substantial environmental damage or substantially that would avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. 6. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements would not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision because the proposed Tentative Parcel Map is for financing purposes and does not have a related project or proposed improvements; therefore, compliance with this finding is achieved due to the fact that the Tentative Parcel Map does not have a related project, thus the proposed action will not cause conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of San Juan Capistrano hereby recommends City Council approval of Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) 22-001, subject to those conditions of approval as established by Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS: The documents and materials associated with this Resolution that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings are based are located at San Juan Capistrano City Hall, 32400 Paseo Adelanto, San Juan Capistrano, California 92675. The Development Services Director is the custodian of records for the record of proceedings. PC Resolution 23-05-24-02 4 May 24, 2023 PROTEST OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS: Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020, the applicant may protest the imposition of fees, dedications, reservations or other exactions imposed on this development project by taking the necessary steps and following the procedures established by Sections 66020 through 66022 of the California Government Code. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of May, 2023. ~~tr .. Joel ent Services Direct