Loading...
10-0211_STUDIO ONE ELEVEN_PowerPointMaster Plan Revision Urbanism / Planning Raimi Associates David Sargent, Anthony Perez • Master planning • Urban design • Site analysis • Development standards/guidelines • Implementation strategy/ordinances • Public outreach eaesoclaR<as Team Architecture / Urbanism Studio One Eleven Michael Bohn, Principal Team lead Project vision • Base map preparation and site analysis • Public outreach Urban design, land use and architecture Market implementation viability 0001 Transportation 1 Civil Engineering Transtech Art Were, Project Manager • Project management Data collection and review • Civil coordination / public Infrastructure • Multimodal transportation planning and analysis Parking demand (ULI Shared Use Parking Model) Alternatives Analysis and modeling Implementation plan and agency coordination 0 i• Landscape to I Rabben Herman Design Office Tom Skintill, Principal • Public realm landscape concepts • Open space design • Streeiscape and open space guidelines • Landscape material palette �O-ff Lje'�? Environmental/CEQA Templeton Planning Group NieWe Carlsson, Director of Environmental S. • Lead CEQA Consultant • Environmental analysis • EIR preparation (Draft and Final) 0 r Economics Keyser Marston Associates Kevin Engstrom, Principal • Background data ! market analysis • Opportunities assessment • Identify land use mix and density • Financial feasibility analysis of build out assumptions and testing of prototype development • Static pro forma analysis of master plan y for mid term and build out conditions that Wit identify annual revenues and costs. AML-Yfl, I'l 1- ,,,.,, CEQA Review �g T«n•«o,c. .q Project Schedule CEQA Review =°ae 10 month process Scope t `a. Expanded 31 acres a. Project Budget pmjert. 0rMret Summary Bas• 9asutSvppl. Ma414r Divi Revls{on yJ3,000 $9i1,BB0 Masmr plan FIR %ml 5193,199 TOTAL 9S87.199 $590,999 Original 7.5 acres walkable District Walkable District '-r Potential Street Grid l r�1 � aa. _ i 4V� S 1' J L Downtown Healdsburg Process waao aa0 as A s p - ........ eocoacz�roa000 °oP Peoaac�a � e � ., .---' _ �I?ao oopD i ieo ....,.- LA 88 R9. Al+ Benefits of a TAD... For the Community • A vibrant, diverse, pedestrian scaled neighborhood that integrates with Old Town and the rest of the city. • More walking and transit trips means reduced dependence on cars and Improved physical health. Increased mobility cholces for low-income, students, and seniors. Ingredients of a Successful T.O.D. Great public Spaces Compact Development Mix of Live+ Work+Play Pedestrian -Friendly Streets Convenient"Park Once" Benefits of a T.O.D... For the City Compact, mixed-use development creates more jobs and tax revenue • Dncreased housing supply, including affordable housing Transit proximmy provides reduced trip counts • More efficient use of limited land resources Complements the revitalisation of Old Town by creating an eastern anchor to Vemura Blvd. MAN ftTT 0?CA1631dJ � . t .- .� Master Plan vs. Specific Plan pEl[P�' CAP[ST APME of iHF V FIFE S1'A1LON r 'PeI pppp- r IPr: 1M C ' 1 ! �� • 7 �J Master Plan Specific Plan Flexible Required Components Content • Vision • Development Program Development Program Land Use Plan • Infrastructure Plan • Financing/Funding Plan • Development Standards • Implementation Plan Force Advisory (except when Regulatory implemented through zoning) Bestused Change is limited Change is substantial where and mostly on private property and both in pubiic r.o.w. and private property Effort $S 555 Implementation Neighborhoods, Districts, "Master Plan" Specific Plan Flexible Required Components Content • Vision Development Program Development Program •�Ji ae,� • Lend Use Pfan land Use Plan • Development Standards Infrastructure Plan • Midtown wP • Financing/Funding Plan • Development Standards wm Salinas River • Implementation Plan Downtown Regulatory Force umplementedthroughintegrated Regulatory zoning and standards) Bestused Change is limited Change is substantial where and mostly on private property and both in public r.o.w. and private property Effort SS SSS Implementation Neighborhoods, Districts, and Corridors a _ c +' , Uptown •�Ji ae,� Riverside Corridor :+.. rid i '' k' • Midtown wP r] L�l2L fix' wm Salinas River Downtown 011' 'd ei South of Downtow ; ;" a Urban Analysis Uptown {` y..• a _ :+.. rid i '' k' • Uptown 1. Imraduce r naighbolhoodxrvirg ralall pbu. abig Spdng SI 1 between 32M aM 341h $heels. 1. Eapandl ha eeluirg agwtit co plez at 2&h and Vim 5lreen. 2.Dk lopan Early Childhood Learning CenlrronIM hock bm d dby Oak Slrrel, 36th Street, Sprig Shrtrf. aMlha 161 ereaway I Inptmc GeogiaB n EleMeMary5ahmamlVjM S-1. Jmkrdirg tenatirg the 11114We leaccan> maw ie ­,Ilelda aM pm,klc bleachers fnrmeilmking the fkel bOb 4.Inhoduce new ureel xg—nu t-., a belle, cr¢cted sheet and block..,k1. conrtertoak pack a the wnoun111ng urban Iabik,aml UNLo Mklt . S. Create a deOwlonoppon,myai ih,$lm Spfbgs slle that 1.1.lef a boaldwak mar 'ha weibeW amt inle'p We Wq 6. fnheduce a w hlchbr and/or pedaslwnal grade crrnsings mer the rust.-rg 'I dhacka a1261h Street. 7. tnhoduee pedeurbn Empo slhiaughan Upiewn[curhaaHixb, nd naEb, new ndewalk; rrplacrmen[ otrrdssieg ss rel trees, rew street lyhls a�w sheet fuinnuEr}, I _I Urban Pattern Analysis r. amoy Downtown qt`.-, i+ fro r��T��4•i{ . ► ria � L.: _,J + Identkfy required additional parking capacity to accommodate anticipated future downtown parking demand based on Shared Use Model • Location of proposed parking facilities provides adequate coverage based on walking distance • Managed use of off street and on -street parking to support "park -once' and reduce demand of individual uroiects Downtown Park -Once Downtown 40W+ I. FxPandthc exitpng rtta8dlsliict nonhwmd le - i 141hkreelaM taNhward akxtg Cine StrrettollM - �, nainstarbn.. Rtqulrt rttailondil grourd lbws. ' 7. Prererwe rht lMustrial character of theama eanW - Pim Snett alongirr rallraed-A, 4 ' i iry, 3. Trdfr,,,Im13ih Sre z. p 7 +. tnrlR ensuing parkiaa bar waha�ed.ure + , �„ildirg•. � � 5. Inlladuce selective lnr+l on Prapeeles mt � reMly—PW 1/y Wildi pofleistee'o[aI �_-- :gmr �e . a. Im�oduce palNaree parking garages. _ - 7. P—figuetarost reel psiNbg fram parallelrn � _ - _` dngkd.Pt kuWtyan Sprhgand 13th Sween B. ImPknte sek[ris^t SSret11[dpe lmlxovemeMt Irk+wstrret llghdng, trretl lreeS.arid sklewalNs). i., __;i 40W+ •�,. ,yam ::.f ., I 4 ' i iry, Itt l•e.r� -�- p 7 -. .. Downtown Infill �"'& 2 F'O" o © City Park Plan New Qty Hall Implementation Priorities 1. Transform downtown intoa restaurant, entertainment, and 6vic center for the City and theregion. Short term projects include: ImYII L • Reconfigure on -street parking from para lei to angled an selected streets. • Traffic -calm 13th Street. • Tailor Pais* Robles City Park to better accommodate performances and events. Longer term projects include: • nloducepark-once garages at strategic t locations • Transform Railroad Street into a pedestrian paseo. Trails and Bike Paths q, - Street Network and Parking Plan 0lr+y lbxr •kml2.d H. /Hbq NtM1 S JIpL1 S a� IuL i f Streetscape Improvements 3. Tree Wells 4. On Street (Curbside) Parking S. Street Lights 6. Street Furniture 7. Bike Parking Public Realm Stormwater Facilities 7. Swacs 2. Infiltration Trenches [a..ay.J IM efs{Fwr— wrt Old Pasadena Parking and Valet Map Parking Policies that Support Downtown I. Increase the In -Lieu Fee. 2. Change the In -lieu Boundary, 3. Stripe Additional On -Street Spaces. 4. Manage Customer Spaces. 5. implement Pay Parking in the Downtown Core. 6. Appoint a parking Manager. S. Establish a Downtown Parking Committee. 9. Produce an Annual Parking Report. Regulating Pian and Zones with Proposed Rights -of -Way IYNP a� i .'I :.r. s A_ e e �r bm Live -Work Court Before New Code 3 FYIA � 561 SRR. lI I! Live -Work Court After New Code Mixed -Use Building Before New Cade tuth ;L:I'1� A j- l i .. — - 4ox5e•eyy keee eur t ek Lancaster Boulevard - Street Paving Lancaster Boulevard - Traffic & Parking Lancaster Boulevard - Landscape mii I d i 6fA i Lancaster Boulevard - Landscape mii I Lancaster Boulevard - Street Furnishings Lancaster Ramblas Transformation Competitive Advantages Al w Creative Housing Michael Dieden El Mission Meridian Ih Pas.d JoledellvreAoteis Chip Can ey All OU5JDV ifornia— bib -L' A� COSIR Whole Foods Patrick Gilh—ly oil f Lincotn and Rose kI n r i a� Oxbow Publ c Market f' Steve Carlin Oxbow M ricetH �l Ferry Building � '71 San ('farm 4C4 f n �. -i I 1' d »y ❑„rerNhtr;Sii iufl r fWill!lf fqp� 1 47 .1 M Yom` µ` rE• .I wT JAI, 3 .74 +- I VA �1 •a"�a -Law IL Irl WIIl afro urrnnllarnu nl �� iv t c �_: 4` �" , �' 2 f � i Y �t �� � �� 1 • tl L �. T� :r Y --��-•'� - �� -'• -1 I • J. Ilfll 1G�1111111141�j •�` y y �I f'r,: FIELD PAO L I _ ° T ' � 1 !►' �- • � � 'I I I �''�*Ci .i�''e-��; 'tel 1'e �� ., 'M ~. ti. .1.26 WIN WAM law NA TA pit WON& 74W .77 Ilk �' • � �M �� .• � �� �umbuk +� 1r;srl s �. ills ,- � • �.: ;fit i • FICI_D A 11' PAOLI CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO FIELD PAOLI ARCHITECTS ARCHITECTURAL & 'URBAN DESIGN Frank Fuller Principal -in -Charge I)ennis l)ornont Car -Project Manager VILLAGE PARTNERS, INC. MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT & PROJECT MANAGEMENT ADVISORS Edward A. DC Avila Principal -in -Charge J. I)onald Ilenry Co -Project Manager ARCHITECTS ORANGE ROULAC GLOBAL HOU5ING CONSULTANT & DAVID TAUSSIG + ASSOCIATES I)a vid G i l in o it r, A I C lr ECONOMIC ANALYSIS Senior Planner -Site Planning Steve liuuiac Jack Selman Ann ILonlae Princip:ll in Charge ll'a .m Dc'iju. Senior Analyst RC Alley, Architectural I)cslgll Principal Mavtd 'I':I II}tily, Shayne M"I'gill] Mathew C oslello PROJECT ORGANIZATIONAL CHART RGF CONSULTING INFRAS'IRUCTURE.CEOA + ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Collette L. Mom, Planning; and Environmental Services Project Manager Starla ISarker, Assistant Project Manager l iddie'lurres, Air/G[IG/Noise Specialist Rebecca Kinney, Ilydrolog;y, Drainage, and Water Quality Charles A. Marr, PM, Water &Wastewater UDS POSSIBLE FUTURE SPECIFIC/GENERAL PLAN Susan J. Ilarden David B arquist FEHR & PEERS TRAFFIC. CIRCULATION +PARKING Jeff Ileald Project Manager Chris Tzrltg Project Planner SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO HISTORIC TOWN CENTER MASTER PLAN lmll 18 NOVEMBER 2009 PARTNERS PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC STREETSCAPE PARKING STRATEGY INFRASTRUCTURE ECONOMICS FINANCE PROCIESS DIAGRAM PLANNING & IMPLEMENTATION SPECIFIC-KAN REDEVELOPMENT:PLAN. ZONING CHANGES OVERLAY ZONES NEW ZONES BUSINESS IMP. DISTRICTR?!�0 PARKING DISTRICT --Apt DESIGN GUIDELINES PROPOSALS Olt— & a Willi UNSOLICITED PROPOSALS ssi I I as,�� mom, g -t SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO HISTORIC TOWN CENTER MASTER PLAN VILLAGE 18 NOVEMBER 2009 PARTNERS Y N Q (v Y H u'a y 0 HQ- P*ECT STARTUP - 2 WEEKS ' I I EXISTING CONDITIONS & DATA 6OLLECTION r 4 WEEKS - BASE MAPPING 14 WEEKS ' DEVELOPMENT OFPROJECT 4LTERNATIVpS-8WEEK� e I DEVELOPMENT OR PREFERED ALTERNATIVE - 6 WEEKS ADMI N DRAFT / AMEND�D MASTERPkAN — 8 WEEP I I PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT/ AMENDEO MASiERPLAN-4 WEEKS FINAL / AMENDED MASTERPLAN- 4 WEEKS , CEQAINITIATION&SCOPING-4WEEKS NOTICE OF PREPARATION —8 WEEKS ° a ADMIN DRAFT EIR —14 WEEKS SCREEN' CHECK DRAT EIR — 5 WErKS PUBLIC �RAFT EIR - WEEKS RESPONSES TO COMMENTS - 7 WEEKS MITIGATION. MONITORING & REPORTINf - 3 WEEKS FINAL EIR -3 WEEKS _ PROJECT SCHEDULE SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO HISTORIC TOWN CENTER MASTFR PLAN VILLAGE 18 NOVEMBER 2009 PARTNERS •-� ` � ,�� , ."►�I 1� �' -+ Vii' ' ', � ��' �f' -- - .�� � 4 �r I m4b''' � � •moi► �-.....r_ — ,f 4 I' ray r; f« •� - 'tiw: �� --� � �� ►rte w j � y �4a044 .. II _�� � � � �� �. f t I t yam' ,�• � •� ... a F C -- -• � -. Q � � •LIE-. z�„=_� . � �al�`'• i I F � P r.: ren. .. , �. �".��!y. = �:.�� .. � 4 ice► • l.�._' ♦' - � �" f1�1�Fs • � y ` r 1 Ili � PAOLI 2J U Cg o L - - 1 P2 F.- :Yvy. „�, „� a+M � w,y LJ . •yrJ, � . , `.Y9i Wl � [ ry.i.p ,.� „� � w J �'7YJ AF PASEO NUEVO, SANTA BARBARA, CA • HISTORIC DOWNTOWN • STRONG PEDESTRIAN EMPHASIS • STRINGENT DESIGN GUIDELINES • MISSION STYLE • COMMUNITY FACILITIES SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO HISTORIC TOWN CENTER MASTER PLAN VILLACL 18 NOVEMBER 2009 " PARTNERS �? ' ate, � ....., + � ��i�b• �+ wk� , .+_ „. � � 4 a 4 _ vt RV •.,s•�F�<+tsrk�� y• r ''(�`,+4� ., � " to hi A TV loge c' y • s MOO . FIELD fAOLI 41.7 Fri 7z BEFORE BEFORE � . w. • .'Ni # A ; .q.I„ . AFTER h AFTER PIELO PAOLI A r dft 1114 �� �� ,+: r �' � �• ' F''t ' � I :' � � Hifi i ', � . ' , t �,� . -j % . �-�w� � . � ISI f * •. i rIL Mr lit • -!�'�� ,� ��N �� � ^+�' a`1 -_ crAjll .moi •. ',7 !� ,yAt'r � .t���`�l� � Y' W1•�r .SP's"1Q �r�c. �.�•� !* i,; 'c,", �'. L y� o � 9 1 << < 4. • Fiero "' PAn u da 'tel a 'I iia l Aw f '® Nil re � � 'y •1` v 117T- f � ���-�Q'�r�:'.IAr I �w _- :��=•I err _ ��, �' .' �':.. FIELD PAOLI w- M w � :T rire 11 • REBUILT DOWNTOWN • STREETSCAPE & LANDSCAPE • HISTORICAL & NEW DEVELOPMENTS • MIX OF USES • STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT ANAHEIM DOWNTOWN PLAN, CALIFORNIA SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO HISTORIC TOWN CENTER MASTER PLAN � PVILLAGE ARTNERS 18 NOVEMBER 2009 tog At 1 t `S t 44 I FIELD PAOLI I FIELD PAOLI THE TEAM FOR SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 1. DEVELOPER EXPERIENCE WITH ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING TRACK RECORD 2. LOCAL KNOWLEDGE & NATIONAL EXPERIENCE 3. CONSENSUS BY STAKEHOLDERS FOR A MASTER PLAN THAT CAN BE IMPLEMENTED 4. CAPABILITY TO CREATE EFFECTIVE PLANNING DOCUMENTS FOR IMPLEMENTATION 5. SUCCESSFULLY BUILT PROJECTS RELEVANT TO SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO'S HISTORIC TOWN CENTER 6. ARCHITECTURE TO REINFORCE THE IDENTITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO'S AGRARIAN & HISTORICAL CHARACTER 7. ECONOMIC & FINANCIAL ANALYSIS FOR PRIVATE & PUBLIC DEVELOPMENT 8. BEST PRACTICES FOR SUSTAINABILITY IN PLANNING & ARCHITECTURE 9. THE AGREEMENT IS IN PLACE - OUR TEAM IS READY TO START THE FIELD PAOLI I VILLAGE PARTNERS TEAM SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO HISTORIC TOWN CENTER MASTER PLAN M vn.IGE 18 NOVEMBER 2009 PARTNERS VILLAGE PARTNERS R r Y \ t �r i 150 CALIFORNIA j 7TH FLOOR I SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111 850 EAST CHAPMAN AVENUE I SUITED I ORANGE CA 92866 T. 415 788 6606 F. 415 788 6650 WWW.FIELDPAOLI.COM T 71 4 288 4020 1 F 714 288 1266 1 WWW.VILLAGEPARTNERS.COM