1988-1101_CAPO VALLEY WARTEWATER AUTHORITY_Master Agreement•
•
I•
u
MASTER AGREEMENT FOR
TREATMENT PROJECT ENGINEERING,
DESIGN AND RELATED SERVICES
ENTERED INTO BY AND BETWEEN
THE CAPISTRANO VALLEY WASTEWATER AUTHORITY
AND
PARSONS MUNICIPAL SERVICES, INC.
0 November 1, 1988
n
u
I•
�0
10
If
If
1•
[7
1•
1•
I•
1•
No
CVW-WWF\MSTRTOC.6
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section
page
REFERENCES
TO DEFINED TERMS
iv
RECITALS
1
SECTION ONE: SCOPE OF PROJECT SERVICES
4
1.1
Phase I Services
5
1.2
Phase II Services
5
1.3
Phase III Services
5
1.4
Phase IV Services
6
1.5
Phase V Services
6
SECTION TWO: AUTHORIZATION FOR PROJECT SERVICES
7
2.1
Services Agreements
7
2.2
Contents of Services Agreements
7
2.3
Authority's Discretion Reserved
9
SECTION THREE: PROSECUTION AND PROGRESS
9
3.1
Notice to Proceed
9
3.2
Changes in Parsons' Personnel
10
3.3
Designation of Authority Representative
10
3.4
Warranty of Quality
10
3.5
Access to Authority's Property and Records
11
3.6
Independent Inspection of Services
11
3.7
Transmission and Review of Deliverables
12
3.8
Permits and Entitlements
12
3.9
Project to be Designed for Competitive Bidding
14
3.10
Timeliness of Performance
14
3.11
Liquidated Damages and Incentive Bonuses
15
3.12
Force Majeure
15
3.13
Cooperation with Adjacent Land Uses
16
3.14
Authority's Consideration of Parsons'
Recommendations
16
i
1•
SECTION EIGHT: MISCELLANEOUS 49
8.1 Notices 49
• 8.2 Warranty of Authority 50
8.3 Waiver of Breach 51
8.4 Order of Precedence 51
8.5 Integration, Construction and Amendment 52
8.6 Headings 52
8.7 Successors 53
EXHIBITS
Authority's RFP
•
Parsons' Proposal
L
•
•
•
•
•
iii
Exhibit "A"
Exhibit "B"
1•
1*
I*
1•
I0
7
REFERENCES TO DEFINED TERMS
Term
Pages
Authority
Authority Representative
1
10
Budget
8
Equipment
34
Fee Schedule
9
Master Agreement
1
Organizational Chart
8
overdue payment
29
Parsons
1
Phase I Services
5
Phase II Services
5
Phase III Services
5
Phase IV Services
6
Phase V Services
6
Project
2
Project Facilities
2
Project Permits
12
Project Services
3
Proposal
2
RFP
2
Schedule of Work
8
Scope of Work
8
Services Agreement
8
Task
8
9 iv
10
I*
10
I•
I•
L
1•
1•
1•
CVW-WWF\MSTRAGRE. 6
MASTER AGREEMENT FOR WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PROJECT ENGINEERING,
DESIGN AND RELATED SERVICES
THIS MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROJECT ENGINEERING, DESIGN AND
RELATED SERVICES (hereinafter, the "Master Agreement") is entered
into as of November 1, 1988 by and between the CAPISTRANO VALLEY
WASTEWATER AUTHORITY, a governmental entity formed pursuant to
the provisions of California Government Code Section 6500, et
sea., and operating under that certain written agreement
entitled "JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT," entered into as of
April 5, 1988 by and between the CAPISTRANO BEACH SANITARY
DISTRICT and the CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO (hereinafter
referred to as the "Authority"), and PARSONS MUNICIPAL SERVICES,
INC., a California corporation (hereinafter referred to as
"Parsons").
R E C I T A L S
A. The Authority is a joint exercise of powers authority
created for the purposes, among others, of planning for,
constructing and operating a wastewater treatment facility to
serve the wastewater treatment and disposal needs of its member
agencies and the residents and wastewater generators within their
respective boundaries.
B. Parsons is a wholly owned subsidiary of The Parsons
Corporation. Parsons provides, through itself and its
affiliates, multi -disciplinary engineering, construction and
0
I*
I•
I•
1•
I•
1•
1•
1•
■•
operations services, and has extensive experience and expertise
in the engineering, design, management of construction,
construction, operation and maintenance of, and project financing
assistance for, wastewater treatment facilities.
C. The Authority issued a Request for Proposals on July 5,
1988, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" but not
made a part hereof (hereinafter, the "RFP"), seeking proposals
from qualified entities for the engineering, design, construction
management, and possibly construction, operation and maintenance
of, and project financing assistance for, a wastewater treatment
facility on land to be acquired by the Authority in Capistrano
Beach, California, which wastewater treatment facility will
provide preliminary, primary and secondary wastewater treatment
with a rated average daily dry weather flow capacity of
approximately six million three hundred thousand (6,300,000)
gallons per day (the engineering, design, construction,
construction management, operation and maintenance of, and
project financing assistance for, the above described wastewater
treatment facility is hereinafter referred to as "the Project,"
and the above-described wastewater treatment facility is
hereinafter referred to as the "Project Facilities").
D. On or about August 9, 1988, Parsons submitted its
written proposal in response to the RFP, which written proposal
was supplemented by a Letter Addendum dated October 11, 1988
(such written proposal and addendum are hereinafter collectively
referred to as the "Proposal," and a copy of the Proposal is
2
A
1•
1•
1•
I•
I•
le
I*
1•
No
attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein by this
reference). The parties mutually understand and agree that the
Proposal contains numerous alternatives relating to the Project,
and that the preferred alternatives will be selected after review
and analysis and incorporated in specific Services Agreements.
The Proposal will be referred to by the parties in good faith to
guide in the preparation of the various Services Agreements to be
entered into between the parties.
E. After reviewing all of the proposals submitted in
response to the RFP, and conducting interviews with selected
proposers on August 30, 1988, the Board of Directors of the
Authority determined on August 30, 1988 that the Proposal
submitted by Parsons was the most responsive to the RFP, and
authorized further negotiations with Parsons for the execution of
an Agreement for the provision of engineering, design,
construction management under either a conventional or fast-track
engineer/contractor approach, and possibly construction,
operations and maintenance and project financing assistance with
respect to the Project (such services are hereinafter referred to
as "Project Services").
F. The Authority and Parsons mutually desire to enter into
this Master Agreement, setting forth the contractual framework by
which Parsons may perform engineering, design, construction
management, and possibly construction, operation and maintenance
and project financing assistance with respect to the Project.
3
1•
1•
I•
I•
1•
I*
1•
1•
I•
EXECUTORY AGREEMENTS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the facts recited above
and the covenants, conditions and promises contained herein, the
parties hereto mutually agree as follows:
SECTION ONE: SCOPE OF PROJECT SERVICES
The Project Services potentially included within the scope
of this Master Agreement include, but are not limited to,
preliminary engineering services as set forth in Paragraph 1.1
(hereinafter, the "Phase I Services"), design engineering
services as set forth in Paragraph 1.2 (hereinafter, the "Phase
II Services"), construction management and coordination services
as set forth in Paragraph 1.3 (hereinafter, the "Phase III
Services"), construction of the Project Facilities under either a
conventional or fast track engineer/contractor approach as set
forth in Paragraph 1.4 (hereinafter, the "Phase IV Services"),
Project Facilities operation and maintenance services as set
forth in Paragraph 1.5 (hereinafter, the "Phase V Services"), and
project financing assistance as may be agreed between the
parties. The parties hereto expressly understand and agree that
this Master Agreement does not itself authorize the performance
by Parsons of any of the Project Services, and that the
authorization to perform any or all of the Project Services shall
only be granted by the execution of Services Agreements in
accordance with Section Two hereinbelow.
4
D
9
I•
10
I•
I•
1•
I•
[:
1•
1•
1.1 Phase I Services: The Phase I Services shall comprise
preliminary Project engineering services culminating in an
approximately ten percent (10%) design of the Project Facilities,
based upon a treatment process which will reliably and cost
effectively provide the wastewater with the required treatment to
meet discharge requirements imposed on the Project.
1.2 Phase II Services: The Phase II Services shall
comprise design engineering culminating in the development of
final plans and specifications for the proposed Project
Facilities, or the commencement of fast track design and
construction services as described in Section 4 of Exhibit "B,"
and related permitting services.
1.3 Phase III Services: The Phase III Services shall
include responsibility for all construction management and
resident engineering of the Project Facilities to assist the
Authority in achieving completion of the construction in
compliance with the approved plans and specifications and within
the time schedule and construction budget established by the
Authority. The Authority shall have full access to the site of
the construction of the Project Facilities at all times during
its construction to observe construction and review compliance
with the approved plans and specifications. As part of the Phase
III Services, project record drawings and a complete operations
and maintenance manual for the Project Facilities shall be
prepared.
5
Ll
1.4 Phase IV Services: The Phase IV Services comprise the
I•
R
19
actual construction of the Project Facilities in compliance with
•
the approved plans and specifications therefor. In this regard,
Parsons expressly acknowledges and understands that the Authority
shall solicit competitive construction bids from Parsons and
•
other selected responsible contractors familiar with and
experienced in the construction, operation and maintenance of
wastewater facilities, and that the contract for the construction
•
of the Project Facilities shall be awarded to the lowest
responsible bidder as determined by the Board of Directors of the
Authority, or as otherwise provided in Section 4 of Exhibit "B".
•
Parsons will be awarded the construction contract if the
Authority determines that the bid submitted by Parsons is the
lowest responsible bid for the construction of the Project
•
Facilities. The Phase IV Services shall not be considered
completed until the Board of Directors of the Authority formally
accepts the construction of the Project Facilities as complete.
•
1.5 Phase V Services: The Phase V Services include the
responsibility for the operation and maintenance of the completed
Project Facilities for a period of up to five (5) years from the
•
date of the Authority's formal acceptance of the Project
Facilities as complete. The consideration to be paid by the
Authority for the Phase V Services shall be based upon the cost
•
of treatment and disposal of the wastewater delivered to the
Project Facilities, at a fixed price or prices per unit volume,
as agreed to between the parties, or as otherwise provided in the
I•
R
19
0
a
1•
1•
I•
1•
I•
1•
1•
specific Services Agreement entered into between the parties
relating to the operation and maintenance of the Project
Facilities. Parsons expressly understands and acknowledges that,
during the period of the Phase V Services, the Authority shall
have the option to negotiate with Parsons for a change order for
Parsons' assistance to the Authority in procuring the Authority's
own operations and maintenance staff, and for training of such
staff.
SECTION TWO: AUTHORIZATION FOR PROJECT SERVICES
2.1 Services Agreements: The Authority shall authorize the
performance of each Phase of the Project Services by the approval
and execution of a separate agreement for each such Phase
(hereinafter, the "Services Agreement"). Parsons shall not
commence the performance of any work or services under any Phase
of the Project Services unless or until a Services Agreement has
been executed by and between the Authority and Parsons for such
Phase, and the Authority has issued to Parsons a written notice
to proceed with work under such Phase.
2.2 Contents of Services Agreements: Each Services
Agreement to be entered into between the Authority and Parsons
for a Phase of the Project Services shall incorporate by
reference the terms, conditions and provisions of this Master
Agreement, and, unless otherwise modified by specific Services
Agreements, shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
7
D
9
Ir
I•
1•
1•
I•
I•
I•
C
10
2.2.1 A detailed "Scope of Work," subdividing the Project
Services to be performed under the Service Agreement into
discrete components (hereinafter, the "Tasks"). The Scope
of Work shall specify, for each Task, the services to be
performed, the product (if any) to be furnished to the
Authority upon completion of the Task, and the budgeted cost
of each such Task.
2.2.2 A detailed "Schedule of Work," correlated to the
Scope of Work. The Schedule of Work shall indicate both the
date of commencement and completion of all of the services
to be performed under the Services Agreement, the completion
date for the performance of each Task to be specified in the
Scope of Work, and the period of time and/or completion date
by which the Authority must complete its review of
submittals and other work product transmitted by Parsons.
2.2.3 An "Organizational Chart," identifying and
designating the individuals employed by or under contract to
Parsons who shall be responsible for the various Tasks to be
performed under the Services Agreement, including but not
limited to Parsons' Principal in Charge, Project Manager or
Project Engineer, and all subcontractors performing
principal portions of the work under the Services Agreement.
2.2.4 A "Budget" for the services to be performed under
the Services Agreement, which shall include a total cost
limitation consistent with the aggregation of costs
contained in the Scope of Work, and the compensation to be
E:?
b
D
0
1•
I•
I•
I•
U,
I•
1•
10
paid to Parsons and principal subcontractors and suppliers
for the performance of each Task in the Scope of Work.
2.2.5 A "Fee Schedule" setting forth the hourly or unit
rates or lump sum amounts to be paid by the Authority for
the performance of services by Parsons' employees, principal
subcontractors and suppliers, or other such method of
compensation established in the Services Agreements.
2.3 Authority's Discretion Reserved: Notwithstanding any
other provision of this Master Agreement or any Services
Agreement to be entered into between the Authority and Parsons,
the Board of Directors of the Authority at all times reserves to
itself the sole discretion whether to enter into any Services
Agreements with Parsons, whether to negotiate with any other
engineer or contractor for the performance of any of the Phases
of Services described in Section One hereinabove, to terminate
any Services Agreement and/or this Master Agreement in
accordance with Paragraphs 6.11 or 6.12 below, to abandon this
Project, and to make determinations with regard to the Project
and Project Services in the best interests of the Authority. The
parties recognize that warranties and binding estimates that may
be provided by Parsons may be contingent upon the award to and
performance by Parsons of subsequent Phases of the Project.
SECTION THREE: PROSECUTION AND PROGRESS
3.1 Notice to Proceed: Parsons shall not commence the
performance of any Tasks pursuant to any Services Agreement
0
•
executed by the Authority and Parsons hereunder until directed in
writing by the Authority to proceed with such Task. Parsons
I�
shall perform the Tasks set forth in each Services Agreement
hereunder in accordance with the Schedule of Work in each such
Services Agreement.
•
I•
I•
1•
1•
I•
I•
Is
10
3.2 Changes in Parsons' Personnel: Parsons shall not
change Parsons' Principal in Charge, Project Manager, Project
Engineer, or principal subcontractors designated in the
Organizational Chart included within any approved Services
Agreement, nor shall Parsons make significant changes in labor
arrangements or in any associations, partnerships or joint
ventures which are required to accomplish any portion of the
Project Services under any Services Agreement, without the prior
written consent of the Authority.
3.3 Designation of Authority Representative: The Authority
shall designate an "Authority Representative" to administer and
act as the representative of the Authority under each Services
Agreement entered into between the Authority and Parsons
hereunder, and shall provide written notice to Parsons of the
designation or change of any Authority Representative.
3.4 Warranty of Ouality: Parsons expressly declares and
warrants that all Tasks and Project Services to be rendered to
the Authority by Parsons pursuant to this Master Agreement and
all Services Agreements executed hereunder shall be performed in
accordance with the standards customarily provided by an
experienced and competent professional engineering organization
10
I•
•
I0
f•
r
I•
1•
10
1•
10
rendering the same or similar services in accordance with
industry standards in the Southern California area. Where
approval by the Authority, its Board of Directors, Authority
Representative or any other representative of the Authority is
indicated under this Master Agreement or any Services Agreement
executed hereunder, it is understood to be conceptual approval
only, and does not relieve Parsons of its responsibility for
complying with all laws, codes and industry standards or of
Parsons' liability for damages caused by errors, omissions or
non-compliance with industry standards on the part of Parsons or
any of its subcontractors performing Project Services.
3.5 Access to Authority's Pronerty and Records: The
Authority shall allow Parsons access at all reasonable times to
all Authority facilities, lands, rights of way and easements, and
to all maps, studies, and other data and documents in the
possession of the Authority which are necessary in the
performance of any Project Services by Parsons. Parsons shall be
responsible for actual research and out-of-pocket costs for
reproducing any maps, improvement drawings, reproductions, or any
other records or documents necessary for the performance of any
Project Services, and shall be reimbursed for such costs by the
Authority pursuant to Section Five hereinbelow.
3.6 Independent Inspection of Services: The Authority
reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to employ, at its own
expense, any or all consultants, engineers, estimators,
inspectors, testing laboratories or other personnel as it deems
11
•
n
•
U
�•
1•
1•
1•
10
necessary to review the Project Services performed by Parsons on
behalf of the Authority.
3.7 Transmission and Review of Deliverables: Parsons shall
transmit to the Authority for its review all submittals and
documentation required under any Services Agreements in a timely
manner as defined in each Services Agreement and in accordance
with the Schedule of Work established in any such Services
Agreement. Unless otherwise directed in writing by the Authority
Representative, no submittal shall be transmitted to the
Authority for its review and comments unless such submittal is
complete. The Authority shall timely review and comment upon
all documents and submittals transmitted to it by Parsons; and
the Authority shall provide Parsons with written comments on and
notifications of approval with respect to all submittals or
documents transmitted to the Authority by Parsons in connection
with any Project Services. Any delay in the timely review by the
Authority shall be reflected in a commensurate extension of the
period of performance by Parsons as specified in the Services
Agreement.
3.8 Permits and Entitlements: All permits, entitlement and
approvals required by any Federal, State or local governmental
agency for the construction or operation of the Project
Facilities (hereinafter, the "Project Permits") shall be in the
name of the Authority, and Parsons shall serve as the agent of
the Authority for the preparation and submittal of all
lz
I•
I•
I•
K
1C
I•
1•
1•
1•
10
applications for and all supporting documentation relating to
such Project Permits. In this regard:
3.8.1 Parsons shall submit to the Authority for its timely
review and approval all applications, submittals and
supporting documentation relating to all Project Permits
prior to their transmittal to the governmental agency or
entity having jurisdiction over the Project Permit; and
Parsons shall provide the Authority with copies of all
correspondence relating to the Project Permits in a timely
manner.
3.8.2 Parsons shall apply for and process the Project
Permits in an expeditious and timely manner.
3.8.3 The Authority shall provide assistance to Parsons in
the application for and processing of the Project Permits
when necessary or as desired by the Authority; provided,
however, that the parties mutually understand that Parsons
has the principal and primary responsibility for obtaining
issuance of all Project Permits, and that the cost of such
Project Permits shall be borne by the Authority.
3.8.4 Parsons shall provide the Authority with reasonable
advance notice of all conferences or meetings relating to
all Project Permits which are conducted with or attended by
the governmental agencies or entities having jurisdiction
over such Project Permits; and the Authority shall have the
right, but shall not be required, to attend any such
conferences or meetings unless the attendance of the
F1k3
LI
u
I•
I•
I•
1•
1•
I•
1•
1•
Authority is required by the agency issuing the permit or
approval.
3.8.5 The parties mutually acknowledge and understand that
Parsons cannot ensure the issuance of any permit or
approval, or the nature or extent of conditions to such
permits or approvals, but Parsons shall use its best efforts
to obtain those permits and approvals that may be required
for the construction and operation of the Project.
3.9 Proiect to be Designed for Competitive Bidding:
Parsons shall prepare all proposed treatment processes, plans and
specifications required or recommended under this Master
Agreement or any Services Agreement executed hereunder to allow
for competitive bidding for construction.
3.10 Timeliness of Performance: Parsons expressly
understands and acknowledges that time is of the essence in this
Master Agreement and in each and every Services Agreement to be
executed between the parties hereunder. Parsons shall proceed
with the performance of each Task under each Services Agreement
immediately after receiving written notice from the Authority to
proceed with such Task, and shall diligently proceed with the
performance of such Task and complete each Task within the time
set forth in the Schedule of Work contained in the applicable
Services Agreement. Parsons shall notify the Authority, in
writing, immediately upon discovering any potential event or
circumstance which, in Parsons, best judgment as professional
engineers, will likely result in a delayed completion of any Task
14
J
I•
15
L
to be performed by Parsons, and Parsons shall provide in such
notice both a time estimate for such delay and a full description
•
and explanation for the delay.
3.11 Liauidated Damages and Incentive Bonuses: It is
presently contemplated that neither liquidated damages nor
•
incentive bonus payments will be assessed or awarded in any of
the Phases of Project Services. However, in the event that the
Authority is required by a duly constituted court, tribunal or
•
regulatory authority to comply with specific performance dates or
be subject to fines or penalties, then the parties will negotiate
in good faith to establish appropriate liquidated damages and
•
incentive bonuses based upon the schedules that then exist, or
may be approved by the parties, in any Services Agreement(s).
3.12 Force Maieure: If delays in the performance of
•
Project Services or any Task or Tasks under a Services Agreement
are caused by unforeseen events beyond the reasonable control of
Parsons, the Authority shall grant Parsons a commensurate
•
extension of time and shall not assess damages for such delays.
For the purposes of this Paragraph 3.12, such delays shall
include, but not be limited to, war, labor disputes, strikes,
•
governmental acts, acts of the Authority, acts of God, fires,
floods, adverse weather necessitating cessation of work,
restrictions imposed by law or by rule, regulation or order of
•
governmental authority, inability to obtain material, equipment
or labor, any other cause which is beyond the reasonable control
of Parsons, or changes in the scope of services required by the
I•
15
L
I•
1•
r,
1•
I•
I•
I•
1•
I•
1•
1•
Authority and approved pursuant to Section Four. Parsons shall,
within ten (10) days from the beginning of any such delay, notify
the Authority in writing of the cause of the delay and set forth
in detail its justification for an extension and additional
compensation, if any. The Authority shall ascertain the facts
and extent of the delay and shall grant an extension of time for
the completion of the Task or the Services Agreement if the
Authority determines from Parsons' notice and other available
information that an extension is justified. The parties shall in
good faith negotiate to determine the amount of time granted as
an extension, and the additional compensation, if any.
3.13 Cooperation with Adjacent Land Uses: The parties
acknowledge and understand that the Project Facilities will be
constructed on land adjacent to lands owned by the Capistrano
Beach Sanitary District, which adjacent lands are intended to be
developed and used by the Capistrano Beach Sanitary District by
itself or its lessees for purposes which may not be related to
the Project. The parties further acknowledge and understand that
the access to the proposed site of the Project will be shared by
the Capistrano Beach Sanitary District and/or its lessees for
their development and use of the lands adjacent to the proposed
site of the Project Facilities.
3.14 Authority's Consideration of Parsons' Recommendations:
From time to time, whenever Parsons deems it appropriate in its
best judgment as professional engineers, Parsons shall submit
written recommendations to the Authority regarding aspects of the
16
1•
10
r
1•
rl
�•
I•
1•
1•
10
Project, or proposed modifications to any aspect of the Project,
which in the best judgment of Parsons must be accepted by the
Authority and implemented in order either to satisfy legal
requirements and/or the goals set by the Authority for the
performance of the Project Facilities, or to ensure the
construction and operation of the Project Facilities in
accordance with the budget or design criteria adopted by the
Authority, or the cost and/or performance guarantees provided by
Parsons. The Authority shall consider each such recommendation
in good faith and timely make a written determination with
respect to each such recommendation, which written determination
shall be transmitted to Parsons. In the event that the Authority
determines either not to accept or to modify any such
recommendation, and it is the opinion of Parsons that such
determination will have a significant adverse effect upon the
cost of design, construction or operation and maintenance, the
treatment capacity or the performance of the Project Facilities,
or the ability of the Project Facilities to perform in accordance
with legal requirements or the goals adopted by the Authority,
then Parsons shall timely transmit written notice to the
Authority, referencing this Paragraph of this Master Agreement
and setting forth in reasonable detail Parsons' opinion, based
upon its best judgment, of the consequences of the Authority's
determination with regard to the anticipated cost or performance
of the Project Facilities, and requesting that the Authority
reconsider such determination. In the event that Parsons timely
17
D
D
1•
1•
1•
I*
1•
1•
[:
10
transmits such written notice and the Authority does not
reconsider and adopt Parsons' initial recommendation, then
Parsons shall not be responsible for the consequences of the
Authority's determination; and, in the event that the Authority's
failure or refusal to reconsider and adopt Parsons'
recommendation results in increased time or cost with respect to
the design or construction of the Project Facilities, the parties
shall negotiate in good faith regarding an increase to the Budget
or Schedule of Work, as appropriate, in the applicable Services
Agreement.
SECTION FOUR: CHANGES IN SERVICES
4.1 Changed and Additional Services: The parties mutually
acknowledge and agree that additional professional services may
be required of Parsons which, due to the lack of firm definition
of the scope and limits of the Project as of the date of this
Master Agreement or any Services Agreement to be entered into
hereunder, cannot be identified with precision. Because the need
for these additional services cannot be established as of the
date of this Master Agreement or any Services Agreement
hereunder, such services shall not be undertaken without specific
definition and written authorization by the Authority, in the
form of a change order, an amendment to a Services Agreement, or
a separate Services Agreement. Parsons shall be paid for such
additional services as agreed by Parsons and the Authority, and
such payment shall be either for a lump sum or on a time and
I•
1•
I•
1•
I•
1•
I•
1•
10
material basis with a cost limitation. Services performed on a
time and materials basis shall be based on the Fee Schedule
included in the applicable Services Agreement.
4.2 Changes Initiated by the Authority: The Authority may
order changes to any Task specified in the Scope of Services
under any Services Agreement by altering, adding to or deducting
from the Task to be performed. If any such change results in an
increase or decrease in Parsons' cost of, or the time required
for, the performance of any such Task, the Services Agreement
shall be amended after negotiation to reflect such adjustment,
based upon the Schedule of work and/or the Fee Schedule included
in such Services Agreement.
4.3 Changes Initiated by Parsons: Parsons shall provide
written notice to the Authority Representative regarding any
pending change to the Scope of Services in any Services Agreement
immediately upon Parsons' discovery of any facts, events or
circumstances necessitating such change. The Authority shall
thereupon review such pending changes and, if the pending changes
are determined to be appropriate under the circumstances, the
Authority shall approve an amendment to the Services Agreement
reflecting such change and making any adjustment in the Budget
or completion date therefor as may be agreed upon by the parties.
4.4 Notification of Increases in Estimated Construction
Costs: If, at any time prior to the approval by the Board of
Directors of the Authority of the final plans and specifications
for the construction of the Project Facilities, Parsons
19
0
a
I•
1•
1•
I•
1•
1•
10
determines that the total construction cost will exceed the
Project Facilities construction estimate to be prepared by
Parsons and accepted by the Authority as part of the Phase I or
Phase II Services, it shall so notify the Authority in writing,
and include in such notification an itemized cost estimate and a
list of possible revisions and modifications to the Project that
Parsons recommends for bringing the cost of constructing the
Project Facilities within the above-described construction cost
estimate. Upon receipt of such notification, the Board of
Directors of the Authority shall have the discretion either to
modify its authorized budget for the Project and/or to modify
the design of the Project in accordance with Parsons'
recommendations so as to bring the construction costs within the
accepted construction cost estimate, to otherwise modify the
Project or the design or capacity of the Project Facilities, or
to abandon the Project. Any modification to the Project or the
design or capacity of the Project Facilities shall be approved by
the Board of Directors of the Authority as an amendment to a
Services Agreement issued hereunder; and, in the event that such
modifications alter the amount of time or cost to Parsons in
preparing such modifications, such amendment shall also include
appropriate adjustments to the Schedule of Work and the Budget of
the applicable Services Agreement. Such amendments and
adjustments in compensation and schedule shall be subject to good
faith negotiations by the parties.
P4.]
•
0
�0
I•
1•
1•
r
1•
1•
1•
4.5 Chancres Resulting from Negligent Services: Parsons
shall perform but shall not be paid for any additional or changed
Tasks or Project Services to the extent such Tasks or Services
result from negligent acts or omissions of Parsons in the
performance of any Project Services under this Master Agreement
or any Tasks under any Services Agreement hereunder.
SECTION FIVE: COMPENSATION TO PARSONS
5.1 Methods of Compensation: The Authority shall
compensate Parsons on a progress payment basis for all labor,
direct costs and expenses, supplies, equipment and subcontract
services incurred by Parsons in performing Project Services
under each Services Agreement, subject to the cost limitation in
such Services Agreement, which may be provided on either a lump
sum or time and expense basis, as follows:
5.1.1 Lump Sum: The Authority shall pay Parsons a lump sum
for the work performed. Monthly payments shall be made
based on the percentage of the work completed during the
month, as certified by Parsons in monthly invoices, and such
payments shall be made within forty-five (45) days of the
date of the submission of such invoices by Parsons to the
Authority.
5.1.2 Time and Expense:
5.1.2.1 The Authority shall pay Parsons for all labor
incurred in the performance of Project Services under
each Services Agreement according to the total number
21
A
•
1•
I*
1•
IL
1•
1•
10
of hours billed by Parsons for services rendered for
each Task specified in the Scope of Work in such
Services Agreement, multiplied by the applicable
compensation rates as set forth in the Fee Schedule in
such Services Agreement. All payments for labor
incurred in performing a Task shall be subject to the
cost limitation for each such Task as set forth in the
Budget in the Services Agreement; provided, however,
that the Authority may authorize reallocation of
savings realized with respect to a particular Task
specified in the Scope of Work under a Services
Agreement for cost overruns in another Task or Tasks
under the same Scope of Work.
5.1.2.2 The Authority shall pay Parsons for all direct
costs and expenses actually incurred in connection with
the performance of a Task specified in the Scope of
Work in accordance with its Fee Schedule in such
Services Agreement.
5.1.2.3 The Authority shall reimburse the Parsons for
the cost of all supplies and equipment actually
acquired and used in connection with a Task specified
in the Scope of Work under a Services Agreement and
included in the Budget in such Services Agreement, in
accordance with the costs actually incurred by Parsons,
subject to the cost limitation for such material or
22
U
1•
1•
1•
I•
1•
1•
1•
1•
10
piece of equipment as set forth in the Budget of the
Services Agreement.
5.1.2.4 The Authority shall reimburse Parsons for all
subcontract service costs incurred in connection with
the performance of a Task specified in the Scope of
Work under a Services Agreement, in accordance with
invoices for services rendered for such Task specified
in the Scope of Work in such Services Agreement, plus
any administrative charges that may be negotiated
between the Authority and Parsons, and set forth in
such Services Agreement.
5.2 Contents of Invoices: As a precondition to payment
under this Master Agreement and any Services Agreement executed
hereunder, Parsons shall submit to the Authority, on a monthly
basis during the term of a Services Agreement, both separate
invoices reflecting the services performed in connection with
each Task set forth in the Scope of Work under the Services
Agreement, and a summary sheet aggregating the charges billed in
each of the separate invoices submitted that month.
5.2.1 A separate invoice shall be submitted for each Task
set forth in the Scope of Work in such Services Agreement on
which Parsons has performed services during the preceding
month. Each such invoice shall set forth for the previous
month:
(a) a detailed itemization of the total number of
Parsons' labor hours incurred in performing work in
23
D
a
�•
I•
1•
1•
1•
1•
1•
connection with the Task, and correlating the total
hours worked by each Parsons employee with the Fee
Schedule and a summary of progress in completing such
Task;
(b) a detailed itemization of the direct costs and
expenses incurred by Parsons in performing services in
connection with the Task;
(c) a detailed itemization of the cost of all supplies
and equipment used by Parsons in connection with the
Task;
(d) a statement of the costs paid by Parsons for
subcontract services in connection with the Task during
the preceding month, together with a copy of the
invoice from each such subcontractor;
(e) a description of any reallocations approved by the
Authority as set forth in Paragraph 5.1.2.1; and
(f) a statement of the percentage of the Task completed
as of the date of the invoice and the amount payable,
the total charges billed by Parsons to the Authority in
connection with the Task, and the total charges paid to
date by the Authority to Parsons in connection with the
Task.
Parsons shall include with each invoice for lump sum payment
appropriate documentation to enable the Authority to verify
the stated percentage of the Task completed by Parsons as of
the date of the invoice.
24
CJ
•
L:
L
•
5.2.2 Parsons shall include with the monthly Task invoices
as set forth in Paragraph 5.2.1 a summary sheet listing, for
each invoice transmitted therewith:
(a) the Task number designation as set forth in the
Scope of Work;
(b) the total amount of the charges included in the
invoice;
(c) the percentage of the Task completed by Parsons as
of the date of the invoice;
(d) the amounts billed by Parsons in connection with
such Task as of the date of the invoice; and
(e) the amounts paid by the Authority in connection
with such Task as of the date of the invoice.
The summary sheet shall also include the total amount of
• charges billed by Parsons to the Authority for all Tasks
under the Services Agreement as of the date of the summary
sheet, and the total amount of money paid by the Authority
• to Parsons for all Tasks under the Services Agreement as of
the date of the summary sheet.
5.3 Review and Payment of Invoices: The Authority
• Representative shall review the monthly invoices and summary
sheet submitted by Parsons, verify both that the percentages of
each Task have been completed as represented by Parsons and that
• Parsons has performed the Project Services in a satisfactory and
•
timely manner, deduct from the invoices any amounts necessary to
cover any stop notices or liens filed in connection with Parsons'
25
•
0
•
r
I•
1•
10
I•
1•
1*
I•
performance of any Project Services, and recommend to the Board
of Directors of the Authority whether to pay the invoices, or any
appropriate amount thereof. The Board of Directors of the
Authority shall consider the payment of the monthly invoices
within thirty (30) calendar days of their transmittal to the
Authority's Project Manager, and payment in accordance with the
determination of the Board of Directors shall be made within
fifteen (15) days of the date of such determination.
5.4 Notification of Potential Cost Overruns: If, at any
time during the term of a Services Agreement, Parsons has reason
to believe that the charges or costs which it expects to incur in
the performance of any Task specified in the Scope of Work under
the Services Agreement during the immediately succeeding sixty
(60) days, when added to all costs previously incurred in
connection with the performance of that Task, will exceed
seventy-five percent (75%) of the cost limitation for such Task,
then Parsons shall immediately provide written notice to the
Authority of such circumstances, provide a justification and an
estimate, if any, for the remaining services necessary to
complete the Task or the Services Agreement and request an
amendment to the Services Agreement, if appropriate. The
Authority shall not be obligated to reimburse Parsons for charges
or costs incurred in excess of the cost limitation in a Services
Agreement unless and until the Authority has notified Parsons in
writing that such additional charges or costs are authorized, and
26
I•
1•
1•
I•
Is
1•
1•
1•
such authorization shall be within the sole discretion of the
Authority.
5.5 Maintenance and Inspection of Parsons' Records: For
and during the term of this Master Agreement, and for a period of
three (3) years thereafter, Parsons shall maintain full, true and
accurate books, records, accountings, documents and other
evidence sufficient to document all significant Project Services
performed, all charges and costs billed, and all actions taken in
connection with the Project. At all times during the term of
this Master Agreement, the Authority shall have the right, upon
two (2) business days notice to Parsons, to review and inspect
during normal business hours any and all such books, records,
accountings, documents and other evidence relating to any
Services Agreement executed by the parties hereunder.
5.6 Audit of Parsons' Records: During the term of this
Master Agreement, and for a period of one (1) year thereafter,
the Authority shall have the right, at its own expense and upon
twenty (20) days written notice to Parsons, to conduct, or cause
to be conducted, a full and complete audit of all of the books,
records, accountings, documents and other evidence pertaining to
Parsons' services under this Master Agreement and any and all
Services Agreements executed hereunder, excluding any services
performed on a fixed rate or lump sum basis. In connection with
any such audit, Parsons shall fully cooperate with the Authority
and/or its representatives, and shall within reason make
available at no cost to the Authority or its representatives all
27
I•
I•
�a
I•
I•
I•
I•
1•
1•
10
employees and independent accountants and auditors who prepared
and maintained such books, records, accountings, documents and
other evidence for or on behalf of Parsons. To the extent
permitted by law, the Authority shall treat all books, records,
accountings, documents and other evidence obtained or made
available during the course of any such audit as confidential
information not subject to disclosure under the California Public
Records Act, Government Code Section 6250, et sea, provided,
however, that the Authority shall comply with any and all lawful
orders, directives, subpoenas or requests for disclosure of such
information.
5.7 Correction of Overpayments: In the event that any
inspection, review or audit performed by or on behalf of the
Authority discloses that the Authority overpaid for any Project
Services, Parsons shall, within thirty (30) days of the date of
written notice of such disclosure, reimburse to the Authority the
amount of such overpayment(s).
5.8 Authority's Responsibility for Payment for Parsons'
Services: Parsons expressly acknowledges and understands that
this Agreement is with the Authority alone, and that none of the
members of or parties to the Authority shall be liable for any of
the sums which may be payable hereunder or for any of the debts
of the Authority unless otherwise provided for in any financing
documents relating to the Project. It is understood and agreed
by both of the parties hereto, however, that the Authority
intends to pay Parsons for its services in accordance with the
FM
II
I•
I•
L
•
I•
1•
1*
1•
terms and conditions of this Agreement from funds to be derived
from any or all of the following sources: State of California
grant or loan funds, Federal grant or other loan funds, transfer
of revenue from local sources of the Authority and its members,
including but not limited to their enterprise funds and the
issuance of debt.
5.9 Parsons' Rights Upon Nonpayment by the Authority: In
the event any payment due to Parsons is not made by the Authority
within the time period specified in Paragraph 5.3 (hereinafter
referred to as "overdue payment"), then Parsons shall have the
following rights:
(a) To add an amount to such overdue payment equal to
0.00033 times the amount of any overdue payment for
each day such payment remains overdue, until paid, or
an amount equal to the maximum amount of daily interest
allowed by law for each day such payment remains
overdue, until paid, whichever is less, or
(b) To stop work during any period of overdue payment upon
fifteen (15) days written notice to the Authority, or
(c) Upon fifteen (15) days additional written notice to the
Authority, to terminate this Master Agreement and any
Services Agreement related thereto, and recover from
the Authority payment for all services rendered by
Parsons, pursuant to this Master Agreement and any
Services Agreement related thereto, together with any
additional costs resulting from Parsons stopping work
F.k]
I•
A
I•
I•
r
I•
•
C
I•
1•
1•
and terminating such Agreements, including reasonable
overhead and profit, as reasonably proven by Parsons,
or
(d) To exercise any other remedy Parsons may have against
the Authority, or
(e) To exercise any combination, or all, of the rights
specified in subparagraphs (a), (b), (c) and (d),
hereinabove.
SECTION SIX: LEGAL RELATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES
6.1 Parsons as Independent Contractor: In its conduct of
any and all Project Services under this Master Agreement and any
Services Agreement executed hereunder, Parsons is engaged solely
in the capacity of an independent contractor, and it is expressly
understood and agreed that no relationship between the Authority
and Parsons other than that of client and independent contractor
has been or is intended to be created by this Master Agreement or
by any Services Agreement entered into hereunder. This Master
Agreement does not constitute, and the parties hereto do not
intend it to create, a partnership between the parties hereto,
nor a joint venture, nor the relationship of employer and
employee or master and servant. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
Parsons shall serve as the agent for the Authority for the
purpose of facilitating the issuance of Project Permits as set
forth in Paragraph 3.8 above.
6.2 Prohibition Against Assignment: Parsons shall not
30
Ll
I•
�•
1•
C
10
[]
1•
1•
1•
assign, transfer, convey, sublet or otherwise dispose of this
Master Agreement, any Services Agreement executed hereunder, or
of any of its rights, title or interest in or to the same or any
part thereof, without the prior written consent of the Authority;
and Parsons shall not assign, by power of attorney or otherwise,
any of the monies to become due and payable to Parsons from the
Authority by reason of Parsons' performance of any Project
Services under this Master Agreement or any Services Agreement
executed hereunder without the prior written consent of the
Authority. If Parsons shall attempt to assign, transfer, convey,
sublet, or otherwise dispose of this Master Agreement, any
Services Agreement executed hereunder, or Parsons' right, title
or interest therein, or of any of the monies to become due to
Parsons from the performance of any Project Services, without
the prior written consent of the Authority, this Master Agreement
and any executory Services Agreements hereunder shall immediately
become null, void and of no legal effect whatsoever, and Parsons'
rights under such Agreements shall be automatically terminated,
revoked and annulled. In the event of any such attempted or
purported assignment, transfer, conveyance, subletting, or other
disposition of this Master Agreement, any Services Agreement
hereunder, or of any of Parsons' rights, title or interest
therein or of any monies to become due thereunder, the Authority
shall have no obligation to pay any such monies due under the
Master Agreement or any Services Agreement to any attempted or
purported assignee or transferee. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
31
1•
1•
1•
1•
I•
1•
L
1•
1•
10
10
the parties mutually understand and agree that the Services and
Tasks may be performed by various subsidiaries or affiliates of
Parsons, including but not limited to Engineering Science, Inc.,
and Parsons Constructors, Inc.
6.3 Authority's Approval of Subcontractors: Parsons shall
not employ any major subcontractors in the performance of its
Project Services without the prior written consent of the
Authority; provided, however, that the Authority shall be deemed
to have consented to any subcontractor listed and identified in
any Services Agreement executed by the parties hereunder.
Parsons shall be responsible to the Authority for the actions,
errors and omissions of all persons and entities performing
subcontract services for or on behalf of Parsons. Nothing in
this Master Agreement or in any Services Agreement executed
hereunder shall create any contractual, employment or agency
relationship between the Authority and any subcontractor employed
by Parsons, or relieve Parsons of any liability or obligation
under this Master Agreement or any Services Agreement hereunder.
6.4 Compliance with Laws: Parsons shall keep itself fully
informed of all existing and future Federal and State laws and
all county and local ordinances and regulations which in any
manner affect its performance of any Tasks or Project Services
under this Master Agreement or under any Services Agreement
executed hereunder, and of all such orders and decrees of bodies
or tribunals having any jurisdiction or authority over the same.
If any discrepancy or inconsistency is discovered in this Master
32
•
Agreement or in any Services Agreement entered into hereunder in
• relation to any such law, ordinance, regulation, order or decree,
Parsons shall immediately report the same to the Authority in
writing. Parsons shall at all times observe and comply with all
• such existing and future laws, ordinances, regulations, orders
and decrees. The hereinabove provisions of this Paragraph 6.4
shall be included in all contracts and agreements entered into
• between Parsons and any of its subcontractors. The Authority
shall reimburse Parsons for any additional costs or expenses
incurred as a result of compliance with any future changes in
laws or regulations affecting the Project.
•
6.5 Compliance with IRCA: Parsons shall at all times
during the performance of Project services be in full compliance
with the provisions of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of
•
1986 in the hiring of its employees.
6.6 Discrimination Prohibited: At all times during the
performance of Project Services, Parsons shall not discriminate
•
against any employee or applicant for employment because of race,
color, religion, sex, marital status, age or national origin.
6.7 Conflicts of Interest Prohibited: No official of the
•
Authority who is authorized in such capacity and on behalf of the
Authority to negotiate, make, accept or approve, or to take part
in negotiating, making, accepting or approving this Master
•
Agreement, any Services Agreements executed hereunder, or any
consulting, engineering, inspecting, construction, operation and
maintenance, or material supply contract or any subcontract in
•
33
10
1•
1•
1•
1w
1•
1•
Irl
I!
1•
1•
10
connection with the conduct or performance of the Project, shall
become directly or indirectly personally interested in this
Master Agreement, any Services Agreement hereunder, or in any
part thereof. No officer, employee, consultant, attorney or
representative of the Authority who is in any legislative,
executive, supervisory, or other similar function in connection
with this Master Agreement, any Services Agreement hereunder, or
the performance or conduct of the Project, shall become directly
or indirectly personally interested in this Master Agreement, any
Services Agreement hereunder, or in any part thereof, or in any
material supply contract, subcontract, insurance contract, or any
other contract pertaining to the Project or the Project
Facilities.
6.8 Patent Indemnity
6.8.1 Parsons shall indemnify and hold harmless the
Authority from any claim, real or alleged, of any third
party that any equipment, materials, devices or processes
(hereinafter referred to as the "Equipment") designed by
Parsons and furnished or used under this Master Agreement
infringes any patent or copyright of the United States. If
the Authority notifies Parsons promptly of the receipt of
any claim and reasonably provides Parsons information,
assistance and exclusive authority to settle and defend the
claim, Parsons shall at its own option and expense either:
(i) settle or defend the claim or any suit or
proceeding and pay all damages, costs and expenses
34
•
•
35
I•
awarded against the Authority in such suit or
proceeding, together with any and all attorneys' fees
•
incurred by Parsons in the defense of such claim, suit
or proceeding, or
(ii) procure for the Authority the right to continue
•
using the Equipment, or
(iii) modify the Equipment so as to render the
Equipment non -infringing without adversely affecting
•
the performance or cost of operation and maintenance of
the Project, or
(iv) replace the Equipment with non -infringing
•
Equipment without adversely affecting the performance
or cost of operation and maintenance of the Project.
If, in any suit or proceeding arising from such a claim, the
•
continued use of the Equipment for the purpose intended is
forbidden by any court of competent jurisdiction, Parsons
shall at its option take one or more of the actions under
•
subparagraphs ii
i
('), ("), (iii) or (iv). The foregoing
provisions of this Paragraph 6.8.1 sets forth the entire
liability of Parsons for patent and copyright infringement
•
of any Equipment.
i ment.
6.8.2 Paragraph 6.8.1 shall not apply to the use of any
Equipment furnished under this Master Agreement in
•
conjunction with any other apparatus or material installed
by the Authority or any third party without the consent of
Parsons.
•
35
I•
C
L
I•
I•
I*
1•
C
I•
I•
1•
1•
6.8.3 With respect to any Equipment furnished under this
Master Agreement which is not designed, formulated or
created by Parsons, only the patent and copyright indemnity
of the manufacturer or creator, if any, shall apply.
6.9 Authority's Ownership of Work Product: All data,
studies, drawings, calculations, plans, specifications, reports,
plats, and other documents prepared by Parsons pursuant to any
Task under any Services Agreement executed hereunder shall, upon
payment in full for the services in connection with such Task, be
furnished to and become the property of the Authority, and the
Authority shall have free and unrestricted use thereof; provided,
however, that Parsons may keep one (1) record copy of all such
documents for its own purposes; and provided, further, that
Parsons shall not be responsible for any use by the Authority or
its members of such data, studies, drawings, calculations, plans
specifications, reports, plats and other documents for uses or
purposes other than those for which they were prepared by
Parsons.
6.10 Suspension of Services
6.10.1 Suspension by the Authority: The Authority may,
at its sole option and discretion, and by written notice to
Parsons, suspend all or any portion of Parsons' performance
of any or all Tasks specified in the Scope of Work under any
and all Services Agreements executed hereunder for a period
not to exceed one hundred twenty (120) days, within which
time the Authority may require compliance by Parsons with
36
•
•
•
I•
I•
1•
10
1•
10
all terms and conditions of this Master Agreement and all
service Agreements hereunder, or after which time Parsons
may deem the Services Agreement terminated. Notice of
suspension shall be delivered to Parsons by registered or
certified mail, return receipt requested, and shall set
forth with particularity which Tasks or other portions of
the Project Services are suspended, and the anticipated
duration of the suspension. The suspension notice shall be
effective upon its receipt by Parsons. In the event of such
suspension, the Authority shall pay to Parsons the
reasonable value of the services performed up to the date of
the suspension in accordance with the provisions of Sections
Four and Five above, together with any additional costs or
expenses not previously included in the Master Agreement or
Services Agreements that are incurred as a result of such
suspension, and Parsons shall be entitled to an extension of
time equal to the length of the suspension, unless the
parties mutually agree otherwise in writing. After the
Authority lifts the suspension, Parsons shall continue the
performance of its services in compliance with the
provisions of this Master Agreement and the pending Services
Agreements entered into hereunder.
6.10. 2 Suspension by Parsons: Parsons may, upon
discovery of hazardous wastes or toxic substances (as
determined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act,
the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and
37
J
n
:-i
r]
n
r]
I•
L
I•
I•
10
Liability Act, or any other federal, state or local
environmental statute, or any amendment thereto, extension
thereof, or regulation thereunder) upon the Project site,
and by written notice to the Authority, suspend all or any
portion of its performance of any or all Tasks specified in
the Scope of Work under any and all Services Agreements
executed hereunder for a period not to exceed one hundred
twenty (120) days, within which time the Authority and
Parsons shall meet in a good faith attempt to resolve all of
the parties' concerns relating to such discovery of
hazardous wastes or toxic substances. Notice of suspension
shall be delivered to the Authority by registered or
certified mail, return receipt requested, and shall set
forth with particularity both the Tasks or other portions of
the Project Services which are suspended, and the reasons
therefor. The suspension notice shall be effective upon its
receipt by the Authority. In the event of such suspension,
the Authority shall pay to Parsons the reasonable value of
the services performed up to the date of the suspension in
accordance with the provisions of Sections Four and Five
above, together with any additional costs or expenses not
previously included in this Master Agreement or Services
Agreements that are incurred as a result of such suspension,
and Parsons shall be entitled to an extension of time equal
to the length of suspension, unless the parties mutually
agree otherwise in writing. If the concerns set forth in
T3
•
the suspension notice cannot be mutually resolved within the
herein provided one hundred twenty (120) day suspension
•
period, this Master Agreement and all applicable Services
Agreements hereunder shall be deemed to be terminated, and
the relevant provisions of Paragraph 6.11 shall apply.
•
6.11 Termination of Services Without Cause: The Authority
may, at its sole option and discretion, and by written notice to
•
J
Parsons, terminate this Master Agreement, all or any portion of
any Services Agreements entered into hereunder, and/or all or any
portion of any and all Tasks specified in the Scope of Work in
any Services Agreements hereunder. Notice of termination shall
be delivered to Parsons by registered or certified mail, return
receipt requested, and shall specify what portions or components
of the Project Services are terminated. The termination notice
•
shall be effective upon receipt thereof by Parsons, except for
•
1•
1•
1•
I•
additional work necessary for the orderly filing of documents and
the closing of work by Parsons. Payment for filing and closing
shall be made by the Authority in accordance with the provisions
of Section Five above; provided, however, that the cost of filing
and closing shall not exceed ten percent (10%) of the Budget for
the Task for which Parsons performs such filing and closing work,
plus any and all costs previously incurred by Parsons in the
performance of such Tasks or services prior to the termination
notice. Acceptance of such payments by Parsons shall discharge
all of the Authority's obligations and liabilities under the
terms of this Master Agreement and all Service Agreements
M
•
hereunder that are subject to the termination notice. After
• filing and closing, Parsons shall deliver to the Authority all
data, studies, drawings, calculations, plans, specifications,
reports, plats, and other documents prepared by or for Parsons in
• connection with the performance of Project Services under this
Master Agreement and all Service Agreements executed hereunder
that are subject to the termination notice; provided, however,
• that Parsons may keep one (1) record copy of all such documents
for its own purposes. Parsons shall be liable only for the
services completed prior to the date of the termination notice.
6.12 Termination of Services for Cause: Notwithstanding
the provisions of Paragraph 6.11, in the event that Parsons
either:
•
•
I•
I•
1•
I•
(a) shall default in the performance or fulfillment of any
material covenant or condition in this Master Agreement or
in any Services Agreement hereunder on its part to be
performed or fulfilled, and shall fail to commence in good
faith to cure such default within ten (10) days following
service upon it of a written notice from the Authority
specifying the default or defaults; or
(b) shall file a voluntary petition in bankruptcy; or
(c) shall be adjudicated a bankrupt; or
(d) shall make a general assignment for the benefit of its
creditors,
then, in any such event, the Authority may, at its sole option
and discretion, without further notice or demand upon Parsons,
«.]
•
:7
:l
n
0
n
[7
I•
1•
I•
10
immediately cancel and terminate this Master Agreement and any
pending Services Agreements hereunder, and terminate each, every
and all of the rights of Parsons and of any and all persons and
entities claiming by or through Parsons under this Master
Agreement or any Services Agreements hereunder, without
responsibility for any further payments to Parsons, except for
the responsibility to pay Parsons all sums due it for
satisfactory work or services performed under this Master
Agreement, including work and services performed by Parsons,
subcontractors, and actually furnished to the Authority within a
reasonable time after termination. The rights of the parties as
set forth herein are cumulative only, and shall in no way be
deemed to limit any of the other provisions of this Master
Agreement or any Services Agreements entered into hereunder, or
otherwise to deny or restrict to either party any right or remedy
at law or in equity which the party may have or assert against
the other party under any law in effect at the date of such
termination. The parties hereto mutually acknowledge and
understand that it is the intent of this Paragraph 6.12 that the
rights of the parties, as set forth herein, shall supplement and
be in addition to or in aid of the other provisions of this
Master Agreement and the Services Agreements entered into
hereunder, and of any right or remedy at law or in equity which a
party hereto may have against the other party.
6.13 Enforcement of Rights Under Agreement: In the event
that an action is commenced by a party hereto against the other
41
11
to enforce its rights or obligations arising from this Master
• Agreement or any Services Agreement executed hereunder, such
action shall be governed by the laws of the State of California,
venue with respect to any such action shall be in the County of
• Orange, State of California, and the prevailing party in such
action, in addition to any other relief and recovery ordered by
the court, shall be entitled to recover all statutory costs plus
• a reasonable amount for attorneys' fees.
I•
I•
I•
work on its subcontract until all insurance required of it in
this Master Agreement and in any Services Agreement hereunder has
been obtained.
7.2 Tvpes of Insurance Required: Parsons shall take out
and maintain at all times during the term of any Service
Agreements executed hereunder the following policies of
insurance:
SECTION SEVEN: INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION
7.1 Requirement
of Insurance: Parsons
shall not commence
•
performance of
any Project Services under any
Services Agreement
hereunder until
Parsons has obtained all insurance required in
Paragraph 7.2 hereinbelow
in a company or companies qualified to
•
do business in
the State of California and
acceptable to the
Authority, and
with a Best's rating of no
less than "A:VII"
unless written
approval to the contrary is
obtained from the
•
Authority, nor
shall Parsons allow any subcontractor
to commence
I•
I•
I•
work on its subcontract until all insurance required of it in
this Master Agreement and in any Services Agreement hereunder has
been obtained.
7.2 Tvpes of Insurance Required: Parsons shall take out
and maintain at all times during the term of any Service
Agreements executed hereunder the following policies of
insurance:
•
•
•
•
•
n
�0
r
1•
10
7.2.1 Worker's Compensation Insurance: Worker's
compensation insurance to cover its employees as required by
law; and Parsons shall require all subcontractors similarly
to provide such compensation insurance for all of its
employees. The policy shall contain the following
endorsements:
a. "The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against
the Capistrano Valley Wastewater Authority, its
officers, directors, employees and representatives."
b. "The Capistrano Valley Wastewater Authority shall be
provided thirty (30) days written notice of any
cancellation or material reduction in coverage under
this insurance policy."
7.2.2 Comprehensive General Liability Insurance:
Comprehensive general liability insurance, including
professional liability, including contractual, broad form
property damage, completed operations, and independent
contractor's liability, all applicable to personal injury,
bodily injury and property damage, with a combined single
limit of $5,000,000.00 per occurrence, subject to an annual
per -project aggregate of $5,000,000.00. The policy shall
contain the following endorsements:
a. "The Capistrano Valley Wastewater Authority, its
officers, directors, employees and representatives are
hereby added as additional insureds under the terms of
this policy, but only as respects the passive or active
43
•
•
7
•
.]
I•
I0
1•
I•
10
negligence of Parsons arising out of the operations of
Parsons at or from the premises of the Capistrano
Valley Wastewater Authority described above."
b. "As regards any active or passive negligence of
Parsons, the insured's insurance coverage shall be
primary insurance as respects the Capistrano Valley
Wastewater Authority, its officers, directors,
employees and representatives. As regards any active
or passive negligence of Parsons, any insurance or
self-insurance maintained by Capistrano Valley
Wastewater Authority, its officers, officials,
employees or representatives, shall be excess of the
insured's insurance and shall not contribute with it."
C. "The Capistrano Valley Wastewater Authority shall be
provided thirty (30) days written notice of any
cancellation or material reduction in coverage under
this insurance policy, as evidenced by receipt of a
registered letter."
7.2.3 Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance:
Comprehensive automobile liability insurance, including
owned, hired and non -owned automobiles, covering bodily
injury, property damage and death, with a combined single
limit of $1,000,000 per occurrence. The policy shall
contain the following endorsements:
a. "The Capistrano Valley Wastewater Authority, its
officers, directors, employees and representatives are
44
•
7
n
u
•
•
E
r
�•
I•
I•
I•
hereby added as additional insureds under the terms of
this policy, but only as respects the active or passive
negligence of Parsons arising out of the operations of
Parsons at or from the premises of the Capistrano
Valley Wastewater Authority described above."
b. "As regards any active or passive negligence of
Parsons, the insured's insurance coverage shall be
primary insurance as respects the Capistrano Valley
Wastewater Authority, its officers, directors,
employees and representatives. As regards any active
or passive negligence of Parsons, any insurance or
self-insurance maintained by Capistrano Valley
Wastewater Authority, its officers, officials,
employees or representatives, shall be excess of the
insured's insurance and shall not contribute with it."
C. "The Capistrano Valley Wastewater Authority shall be
provided thirty (30) days written notice of any
cancellation or material reduction in coverage under
this insurance policy, as evidenced by receipt of a
registered letter."
Simultaneously with the execution of this Master Agreement,
Parsons shall make available for review at Parsons' office in the
City of Pasadena, California, the original policies of insurance
required under Paragraphs 7.2.1, 7.2.2 and 7.2.3, and present a
certificate of insurance evidencing the issuance of such
insurance and the additional insureds and other provisions and
45
r]
I•
I•
10
1•
10
Parsons, its employees, subcontractors or representatives of any
Task or any Project Services under this Master Agreement and any
Services Agreements executed by the parties hereunder; provided,
however, that the Authority, its officers, directors, employees,
representatives and agents shall not be indemnified or held
harmless for that portion of such actions, claims, damages to
persons or property, penalties, obligations or liabilities that
result from the passive or active negligence on the part of the
Authority, its officers, directors, employees, representatives or
agents; and provided, further, that such indemnification shall
46
endorsements required herein. At least thirty (30) days prior to
the expiration of any such policy, a signed complete certificate
of insurance, with all endorsements required herein, showing that
such insurance coverage has been renewed or extended, shall be
+
filed with the Authority. The insurance required by Paragraph
7.2.2 shall be maintained and evidenced by certificates of
insurance for a period of time ending two (2) years after
completion of services performed by Parsons.
7.3 Indemnification by Parsons: Parsons shall indemnify
the Authority, its officers, directors, employees,
representatives and agents against and hold and save them and
each of them harmless from any and all actions, claims, damages
to persons or property, penalties, obligations or liabilities
that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm, entity,
corporation, political subdivision or other organization arising
out of or in connection with the negligent performance by
I•
I•
10
1•
10
Parsons, its employees, subcontractors or representatives of any
Task or any Project Services under this Master Agreement and any
Services Agreements executed by the parties hereunder; provided,
however, that the Authority, its officers, directors, employees,
representatives and agents shall not be indemnified or held
harmless for that portion of such actions, claims, damages to
persons or property, penalties, obligations or liabilities that
result from the passive or active negligence on the part of the
Authority, its officers, directors, employees, representatives or
agents; and provided, further, that such indemnification shall
46
I•
•
n
J
•
•
I•
10
exclude such actions, claims, damages to persons or property,
penalties, obligations or liabilities arising from the willful
misconduct of the Authority, its officers, directors, employees,
representatives, agents or those independent contractors who are
directly responsible to the Authority. In connection therewith:
7.3.1 Parsons shall defend any action or actions filed in
connection with any of such claims, damages, penalties,
obligations or liabilities, and shall pay all costs and
expenses, including attorneys' fees, incurred in connection
therewith.
7.3.2 Parsons shall promptly pay any judgment rendered
against Parsons or the Authority covering such claims,
damages, penalties, obligations or liabilities, and Parsons
shall save and hold the Authority harmless therefrom.
7.3.3 In the event the Authority is made a party to any
action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against Parsons for
such damages or other claims arising out of or in connection
with the performance by Parsons or any of its subcontractors
of any Tasks or Project Services under this Master Agreement
or any Services Agreement hereunder, Parsons shall defend
the Authority and pay any and all costs and expenses
incurred by Parsons, including attorneys' fees, in such
action or proceeding.
7.3.4 So much of the money due to Parsons for the
performance of any Task or Project Services under and by
virtue of this Master Agreement or any Services Agreement
47
0
0
•
7
•
:7
.7
I•
1•
I•
C
16
hereunder as shall be considered reasonably necessary by the
Authority may be retained by the Authority until disposition
has been made of any pending actions, claims, liens or
penalties; provided, however, that no moneys shall be
retained by the Authority in the event that Parsons obtains
appropriate and sufficient bonds or other security to cover
any such actions, claims, liens or penalties.
Parsons' duties to indemnify, defend and hold harmless under this
Section Seven and all other provisions of this Master Agreement
and any and all Services Agreements, and its liability to the
Authority for all aforesaid matters, is limited to the proceeds
recovered from insurance carried by Parsons as required in
Paragraph 7.2 above and in any and all Service Agreements
executed hereunder, and within the coverage limits specified
herein and in such Service Agreements, after settling third party
claims.
7.4 Indemnification by Authority: To the full extent
permitted by applicable law, the Authority hereby agrees to
defend, indemnify and hold harmless Parsons from and against any
and all loss, liability or damage, real or alleged, in connection
with any and all claims or proceedings (whether brought by
private third parties or governmental agencies) for bodily
injury, death, property damage, environmental damage or
impairment or any other injury or damage arising out of or
relating to any hazardous wastes or toxic substances present
within the boundaries of the proposed site of the Project without
48
J
:]
n
u
•
:7
I9
I•
I•
I•
the prior knowledge, involvement or participation of Parsons, or
involving any violation or alleged violation of, or any liability
under, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability
Act, or any other federal, state or local environmental statute,
or any amendment thereto, extension thereof, or regulation
thereunder, provided that such indemnification by the Authority
shall not apply to any knowing or intentional actual or alleged
violation by Parsons of any such statute, amendment, extension or
regulation, or any liability resulting from any such knowing or
intentional actual or alleged violation by Parsons.
7.5 Conseauential Damages: Except as otherwise expressly
provided for herein or in any Services Agreement executed
hereunder, in no event shall either party or its respective
members, parent entities, affiliates or subsidiaries be liable to
the other party in contract, tort, strict liability, warranty, or
otherwise, for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential
damages, such as, but not limited to, loss of product, loss of
anticipated profits or revenue, loss of use of the equipment or
system, non -operation or increased expense of operation of other
equipment or systems, cost of capital, or cost of purchased or
replacement equipment or systems.
SECTION EIGHT: MISCELLANEOUS
8.1 Notices: Except as otherwise set forth hereinabove or
in any Services Agreement hereunder, all notices, payments,
49
•
transmittals, documents or other writings required or permitted
0 to be delivered or transmitted to any of the parties under this
Master Agreement shall be personally delivered or deposited in a
United States mail depository, first class postage prepaid, and
0 addressed as follows:
If to Authority: Capistrano Valley Wastewater
Authority
• 25752 Victoria Boulevard
P.O. Box 2008
Capistrano Beach, CA. 92624
Attn: Dennis Erdman, Manager
If to Parsons: Parsons Municipal Services, Inc.
• 100 West Walnut
Pasadena, California 91124
Attn: Kline P. Barney, Jr.
or such other address any party may direct in writing; provided,
u
however, that such new or different address shall not become
effective until acknowledged in writing by the party to whom
directed. Except where service is by personal delivery or by
registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, service
0
of any instrument or writing shall be deemed completed forty-
eight (48) hours after deposit in a United States mail
depository.
l0
8.2 Warranty of Authority: Each officer of the Authority
and Parsons affixing his or her signature to this Master
Agreement or any Services Agreement executed hereunder warrants
1•
and represents by such signature that he or she has the full
legal authority to bind his or her respective party to all of the
terms, conditions and provisions therein, that his or her
[7
!,'S1]
C.
•
:l
n
•
•
•
:]
I•
1•
1•
10
respective party has the full legal right, power, capacity and
authority ,to enter into the Master Agreement or such Services
Agreement and perform all of its provisions and obligations, and
that no other approvals or consents are necessary in connection
therewith.
8.3 Waiver of Breach: No failure on the part of either
party hereto to insist upon or demand the strict performance by
the other of any covenant, term, condition, or promise of this
Master Agreement or of any Services Agreement hereunder, or to
exercise any right or remedy as a result of any breach thereof,
shall constitute a continuing waiver of any such breach or of
such covenant, term, condition or promise. No waiver of any
breach shall in any way affect, alter or modify either this
Master Agreement or any Services Agreement executed hereunder,
but each and every covenant, term, condition and promise of this
Master Agreement and all Services Agreements hereunder shall
continue in full force and effect.
8.4 Order of Precedence: In the event of any conflict or
inconsistency between the contractual documents relating to this
Project, the order of precedence shall be as follows:
6.4.1 A change order or amendment to an executed Services
Agreement shall take precedence over such Services
Agreement, any amendment to this Master Agreement, this
Master Agreement, and the Proposal attached as Exhibit "B"
hereto;
624
•
u
7
J
•
1•
I•
1•
I•
8.4.2 A Services Agreement executed hereunder shall take
precedence over any prior dated Services Agreement, any
prior dated amendment to this Master Agreement, this Master
Agreement and the Proposal attached as Exhibit "B" hereto;
8.4.3 An amendment to this Master Agreement shall take
precedence over this Master Agreement and the Proposal
attached as Exhibit "B" hereto;
8.4.4 This Master Agreement shall take precedence over the
Proposal attached as Exhibit "B" hereto.
8.5 Integration. Construction and Amendment: This Master
Agreement and any Services Agreements executed hereunder
represent the entire understanding of the Authority and Parsons
as to those matters contained therein, and no prior oral or
written understanding shall be of any force or effect with
respect to those matters covered thereby. This Master Agreement,
and each Services Agreement entered into hereunder, shall be
governed by the laws of the State of California and construed as
if drafted by both the Authority and Parsons. This Master
Agreement, and any and all Services Agreements executed
hereunder, may not be modified, altered or amended except in
writing signed by both the Authority and Parsons.
8.6 Headings: The titles and headings of Sections and
Paragraphs of this Master Agreement, as herein set forth, have
been inserted for the sake of convenience only, and are not to be
taken, deemed or construed to be any part of the terms, covenants
52
•
or conditions of this Master Agreement, or to control, limit or
• modify any of the terms, covenants or conditions hereof.
8.7 Successors: Subject to the provisions of Paragraph 6.2
above, this Master Agreement, any Services Agreement entered into
• hereunder, and all of the terms, conditions and provisions herein
and in such Services Agreements, shall inure to the benefit of,
and be binding upon, the Authority, Parsons, and their respective
• successors and assigns.
•
•
I•
I•
1•
1•
10
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Master
Agreement as of the date first written above.
APP VED AS.TO FORM:
R N &T C rR//�J
Gen u sel, CIE
Valley wastewater Au
CAPISTRANO VALLEY, WASTEWATER
AUTHOAITY
Pres dent//
ano
ity Secretary
53
PARSONS MUNICIPAL SERVICES,
INC. S //A
President
I•
I•
I•
I•
1•
I•
1•
tj
CAPISTRANO VALLEY WASTEWATER AUTHORITY
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS CONCERNING THE DESIGN,
-ONSTRUCTION, OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE OF A
NEW 6.3 MGD WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
The Capistrano Valley Wastewater Authority (CVWA) is requesting
proposals for the design, construction, operations and
maintenance of a new 6.3 million gallon per day (mgd) wastewater
facility. You are invited to submit your written
proposal for performing the engineering services, construction
coordination, construction of facilities, and operation and
maintenance services as set forth in the enclosed Request for
Proposals (RFP).
Proposals made in response to this request shall be submitted to
the Authority by the close of business on August 9, 1988.
Proposals should be addressed to Mr. Dennis Erdman, General
Manager, CVWA, 25752 Victoria Blvd, P. O. Box 2008, Capistrano
Beach, Ca. 92624. The proposer shall submit 10 copies of its
proposal to the Authority. Questions regarding this Request for
Proposal may be directed to the Authority's Engineer, HYA
Consulting Engineers, 1010 S. Baldwin Avenue, Suite B, Arcadia,
Ca. 91006 (Attention: Mr. Michael Hoover). A pre -proposal
meeting will be held at the CVWA's office on July 27, 1988 at
1:30 p.m. All proposers are urged to attend this meeting.
Proposals received by the Authority will be reviewed and
evaluated in accordance with a point system as follows:
Maximum Points
1. Project team qualifications 20
2. Proposer's related experience 20
3. Approach to project 20
4. Understanding of project concept 15
5. Proposed contractual terms and conditions 10
6. Estimated project costs/schedule 15
Total 100
i
EXHIBIT P
It is anticipated that the three proposers scoring the
highest total points will be short-listed. During the review of
proposals, the Authority may contact the proposers for
clarification of their proposals and may contact the references
provided by the proposers. The proposers will be notified of
the results of the proposal review by August 15, 1988, and the
short-listed proposers will be requested to attend an interview
with the Authority, tentatively scheduled for the week of August
29, 1988. The exact time, place, and format of interview will be
announced at a later date. Based on the results of the
interview, the proposer who appears to be able to best meet the
project needs will be selected for negotiation of an agreement.
Submission of a proposal in response to this Request for
Proposals shall constitute the proposer's acceptance of the
general terms and conditions set forth herein. The CVWA reserves
the right to reject any and all Proposals, to waive any
informality in any Proposal, and to make awards in the interests
of the Authority. The Authority reserves the right to use any
and all ideas, concepts and processes presented in any Proposal
submitted in response to this Request for Proposals, regardless
of whether the Proposal is selected or rejected. By the
submission of its Proposal, the Proposer waives any right to
object to the use of any such information by CVWA irrespective
of whether the Proposal is selected or rejected. Any portion of
the Proposal that includes trade secrets or is proprietary in
nature shall be clearly marked as proprietary, or submitted under
separate cover marked proprietary.
DATED: July 5, 1988
CAPISTRANO VALLEY WASTEWATER AUTHORITY
By:
Dennis Erdman, Manager
:se
ii
I•
1•
1•
El
1•
r
I•
I•
I•
1•
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
CAPISTRANO VALLEY WASTEWATER AUTHORITY
INTRODUCTION
The Capistrano Valley Wastewater Authority (CVWA or
"Authority") is a recently formed joint powers agency between the
Capistrano Beach Sanitary District and the City of San Juan
Capistrano. The Authority was formed for the primary purpose of
constructing a new 6.3 -MGD wastewater treatment facility to meet
the wastewater treatment and disposal needs of both agencies.
Prior to the formation of the Authority, the District and City
cooperated in the preparation of a Facilities Plan. An EIR as
required by the California Environmental Act has been prepared.
This request solicits proposals to enter into a wastewater
service contract with the CVWA under terms and conditions in
which the Engineer/Contractor shall provide necessary
engineering, design and construction coordination, and possibly
the construction and operation of a new proposed 6.3 MGD
wastewater facility.
BASIC INFORMATION REGARDING THE PROPOSED FACILITY
The Facilities Plan for the proposed joint 6.3 -MGD wastewater
treatment facility was prepared by Ray E. Lewis Consulting
Engineers, Inc., and sets forth the design concepts for the
Facility to meet the regulatory requirements, as well as the
self-imposed environmental concerns of the two agencies. The
Facility shall be designed to meet the secondary treatment levels
for ocean discharge of 30 mg/1 for BOD and total suspended solids
as well as the California Ocean Plan limitations. The self-
imposed environmental requirements of the Authority are:
o Facility must be designed as odor- and nuisance -free as
possible;
IW
A
1•
1•
I•
C
I•
1•
I•
1•
[:
o Incorporate state-of-the-art technologies wherever
possible to minimize the operation and maintenance
requirements and to maximize reliability of the
facility;
o Provide simplistic and cost-effective operation;
o Consider disposal of residuals to meet present and
future disposal requirements and regulations.
Copies of the Facility Plan Report are available from the
Authority for a non-refundable fee of $25.00. As set forth in
the preceding paragraphs, the Engineer/Contractor is not
required to utilize the alternate design concepts as set forth
in the Facilities Plan. However, all design concepts, treatment
processes, or facilities proposed by the Engineer/Contractor
shall be approved by the Authority, and the Facility must meet
the Authority's requirements.
T1.� T�:ility will be constructed on vacant property currently
owned by the Capistrano Beach Sanitary District, which will be
acquired by the Authority. All rights, title and interest in and
to the site, as well as the new treatment facility, will at all
times remain in the ownership of the Authority, and the
Engineer/Contractor shall not acquire any possessory or
ownership interest in the site or Facility.
The new wastewater treatment and
disposal
facility
will be
designed with a capacity
of 6.3 MGD. Projected
flow
to the
facility is as follows:
1990
1995
2000
2015
Average daily flow, MGD
4.05
4.77
5.40
6.30
Peak flow, MGD
10.13
11.93
13.50
15.75
The facility will be a secondary treatment facility which will
use the following treatment processes:
Raw Sewage Influent
Conveyance of District's
Facility's headworks.
Preliminary Treatment
Influent Screening
Grit Removal
PA
and City's sewage to new
11
1•
1•
1•
1•
1•
I•
1•
10
1•
Primary Treatment
Primary Sedimentation*
Secondary Treatment
Biological Treatment
Secondary Sedimentation
Disinfection
Chlorination
Effluent Disposal
Effluent outfall to S.E.R.R.A. outfall surge tower
Effluent pumping
Solids Handling
Sludge Digesters (aerobic or anaerobic)
Sludge Dewatering
Off-site disposal or recycling
* May not be required depending on process selected.
PROTECT SCHEDULE
The Authority has established a Facility time schedule to
complete this project by 1991. The key milestones are as
follows:
Selection of
Engineer/Contractor
September
6, 1988
Commencement
of Engineering
October 4,
1988
3
•
U
I•
1•
I•
1•
1•
1•
10
Completion of Preliminary
Engineering
Completion of Final
Engineering
Commencement of Construction
Completion of Construction
Completion of Facility Startup
December 15, 1988
June 16, 1989
September 1989
September 1991
November 1991
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The scope of services to be provided by the
Engineer/Contractor shall include preliminary engineering, design
engineering, and construction coordination. The construction of
facilities, and operation and maintenance services may be
provided by the Engineer/Contractor or others. Each of these
services is more specifically described in the following
paragraphs.
1. Preliminary Engineering. This phase constitutes
approximately a ten -percent design of the proposed Facility.
Using the data available in the Facilities Plan, the
Engineer/Contractor shall develop a treatment process which will
most reliably and cost effectively provide the wastewater with
the required treatment to meet discharge requirements. The
Engineer/Contractor shall evaluate various feasible alternatives
including, but not limited to, those considered in the Facilities
Plan, and propose the best alternative. The Engineer/Contractor
is not required to follow the recommendations of the Facilities
Plan, but if it should elect to do so, it shall ascertain that
such recommendations will indeed be capable of meeting the
requirements of this project. Design criteria, process diagrams,
facilities layouts, preliminary equipment selection, and cost
estimates shall be prepared for the proposed treatment process.
Also included under preliminary engineering shall be all
necessary field surveys, geotechnical investigations, report of
waste discharge to be submitted to the San Diego Regional Water
Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and identification of all permits
required, including, but not limited to, those required by the
South Coast Air Quality Management District, and the procedures
to obtain such permits.
The work performed under preliminary engineering shall be
presented in a preliminary engineering report to be submitted to
the Authority for review. The report shall present a discussion
• of the alternatives considered; a description of the recommended
project; a project schedule for design, construction and startup;
and a listing of the permits required as well as the waste
discharge report to be submitted to RWQCB. The description of
the recommended project shall, as a minimum, include the design
criteria, process diagrams, plant and unit layouts, equipment
• selection, paving and architectural treatments, cost estimate and
a discussion of the construction and operation requirements. The
Engineer/Contractor shall make a presentation of the preliminary
engineering report to the Authority and shall meet with the
Authority to discuss review comments. The Authority's review
comments shall be incorporated into the preliminary engineering
• report.
2. Design Engineering. After the approval of the
preliminary engineering report by CVWA, the Engineer/ Contractor
siiall develop final plans and specifications for the facility.
Final plans and specifications as defined herein are plans and
• specifications completed to a degree that the Engineer/Contractor
or any other responsible contractor familiar with wastewater
treatment construction, can meaningfully submit a firm and
guaranteed fixed -cost bid for constructing the Facility. As
part of this phase of the work, the Engineer/Contractor shall
submit, with the final plans and specifications, detailed
• construction cost estimates. Construction costs shall be
inclusive of all labor, materials, and equipment, plus a
reasonable start-up operational program. A detailed operation
and maintenance cost for the initial five years after start-up
shall also be submitted.
r1
Throughout the course of design engineering, the
Engineer/ Contractor shall work closely with the Authority. Two
submittals shall be prepared for the Authority's review, at the
50 -percent and 90 -percent completion levels, respectively. The
50 -percent submittal shall include reasonably well developed
• plant layout, paving and grading plans, architectural elevations,
mechanical drawings, and specifications for general provisions
and process equipment. The 90 -percent submittal shall include
nearly completed plans and specifications, a cost estimate as set
forth in the preceding paragraph, and an updated project
schedule. The Engineer/Contractor shall meet with the Authority
• to discuss review comments after each submittal and shall
incorporate the Authority's review comments into the plans and
specifications.
•
40
As part of design engineering, the Engineer/Contractor shall
obtain in the name of the CVWA all permits required as
identified in the preliminary engineering report. The work shall
include performance of all necessary analyses, preparation of all
necessary documents, submission of documents to and coordination
with the permitting agencies, as well as coordination with the
Authority. All permit submittals and supporting documentation
shall be reviewed and approved by CVWA prior to submission to
the permitting agencies, and all permit fees will be paid for by
r the Authority.
I0
li
1•
1•
I*
3. Construction Coordination. The Engineer/Contractor
shall be responsible for all construction coordination,
construction management, and inspection of the Facility to
insure completion within the agreed time schedule and contract
budget established by the Authority. The Authority shall have
full access to the site during construction to observe
construction and review contract compliance. Included in this
phase is the preparation of "As -Constructed" plans and the
preparation of an operations and maintenance manual for the
Facility.
4. Construction of Facilities. The CVWA shall solicit
competitive construction bids from Engineer/Contractor and other
selected responsible contractors familiar and experienced in the
construction, operation and maintenance of wastewater facilities.
The construction contract shall be awarded to the lowest
responsible bidder as determined by CVWA. The
Engineer/ Contractor will be awarded the construction contract if
the CVWA determines the Engineer/ Contractor to be the lowest
responsible bidder for the construction of the Facility.
5. Operation and Maintenance. When the construction is
near completion, the Engineer/Contractor may provide for
operation and maintenance of the Facility for a period of 5 years
from the Authority's Acceptance of the Facility at the option of
the Authority. The cost of treating and disposal of the
wastewater delivered to the Facility during the agreed upon
operating period shall be the fixed price or prices per unit
volume specified in the contract agreement. During the contract
period, the Authority shall have the option to negotiate with the
Engineer/Contractor a change order for assistance to the
Authority to procure its own operating and maintenance staff and
to train the staff.
i♦
I•
•
1•
•
I•
I•
1•
1•
1•
1•
SPECIFIC INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED IN THE PROPOSAL
The Project Team
Describe the firm
the Proposer. Discuss
and organizational
key/projects, if any
multiple agency wastew
(or firms) comprising or associated with
the experience of the firm(s), their role
experience with turn -
in projects involving
structure, their
, and experience
ater projects.
Identify the key individuals to be assigned to the project
and describe their relevant experience and respective roles in
the project organization. Key individuals should include, at a
minimum, the project principal, the design engineer, the
construction manager, and the operations manager. Furnish
resumes, and if key individuals are from unaffiliated firms,
letters should be furnished describing the nature of the
association with the proposer.
If the Proposer intends to submit a proposal as a partnership
or joint venture, but has not yet finalized such relationship,
state the nature of its proposed organization and details
regarding how it is to be created, by whom, when, and any other
information that may assist the Authority in evaluating the
proposal.
2. Related Experience
List all wastewater facilities related to the CVWA project
and proposed team for which the Proposer has provided planning,
design, construction, and/or operations services within the past
five years. For design experience, indicate the project name and
location; the plant size in MGD; when the design work was
initiated; the completion date; the constructed value; the
percentage variance between the final constructed value and the
amount of the accepted construction bid; and the name, address
and telephone number of a reference contact. For construction
experience, identify the client, the constructed value of the
facility, and the name, address and telephone number of a
reference contact. For operations experience, identify the
facility and/or owner; the type of treatment; the capacity of
the facility in MGD; and the name, address and telephone number
of a reference contact.
3. Engineer/Contractor Approach
• Describe "the Proposer's understanding of the issues
associated with the Turn -Key approach for the project. Discuss
concepts and approach to accomplish the services specified in
this request for proposal. Provide a detailed scope of work
tasks for the services required and make recommendations, if any,
for modification of the scope of services described above, such
• that the project may be better implemented. The
Engineer/Contractor shall not be responsible for financing of the
project; however, if the proposer can assist in securing low cost
financing for the Authority, state how such assistance can be
provided.
4. The Desian Concept
In three pages or less, describe the Proposer's understanding
of the technical design issues related to the project and the
processes that the proposer considers to be capable of meeting
• the project's anticipated effluent discharge standards in a
reliable and cost effective manner. In addition, you should
include flow diagrams, schematics and other data as necessary.
I•
I•
I•
1•
1•
16
Contractual Terms and Conditions
In three pages or less, describe the nature of the
contractual relationship contemplated with the Authority.
Discuss any contractual terms or conditions that the Proposer
believes to be non-negotiable. In an appendix, furnish either a
specimen contract or the table of contents for, or the outline
of, the envisioned contract.
6. Project Costs and Schedule
Provide estimated costs for each of the phases of work as
previously outlined and typical costs for construction and
operation of typical 6.3 -MGD plants which incorporates the
processes and facilities that may be proposed.
A. Preliminary Engineering
B. Design Engineering
C. Construction Coordination
D. Construction of Facilities (typical for specified
processes proposed)
•
E. Operations and Maintenance of Facilities (typical for
specified processes proposed)
• Review the Authority's proposed time schedule, make comments
and include a detailed schedule of implementation from notice to
proceed from the Authority to completion of the start-
up/commissioning phase (acceptance of the Facility), and
commencement of the annual operations and maintenance activities.
• Describe the Proposer's strategy for implementing the
project, including a generalized project implementation schedule
with key project milestones. If the Proposer envisions any
special permits or governmental approvals, these should be noted.
Identify deliverables and the proposed schedule for completing
the deliverables and furnishing them to the Authority.
•
n
•
I•
I•
I•
1•
W
1•
i•
•
L
i•
Proposal for Design, Construction
Operation and Maintenance
of a
NEW 6.3 MGD WASTEWATER
TREATMENT FACILITY
Presented to
THE CAPISTRANO VALLEY
WASTEWATER AUTHORITY
PARSONS MUNICIPAL SERVICES, INC.
EXHIBIT 6
71
•!
i
Proposal for Design, Construction
Operation and Maintenance
of a
NEW 6.3 MGD WASTEWATER
TREATMENT FACILITY
Presented to
THE CAPISTRANO VALLEY
WASTEWATER AUTHORITY
i
Proposal No. 606-1682
August 9, 1988
i
1
I ; PARSONS MUNICIPAL SERVICES, INC.
100 WEST WALNUT STREET
PASADENA CALIFORNIA 91124
18187 440.2000
Telex WH 875-336
Mr. Dennis A. Erdman
General Manager
Capistrano Valley Wastewater Authority
25752 Victoria Blvd., P.O. Box 2008
Capistrano Beach, California 92624
Dear Mr. Erdman:
August 9, 1988
We are pleased to transmit Parsons proposal for the design, construction,
operations, and maintenance of a new 6.3 mgd wastewater treatment facility.
We have made every effort to be responsive to your Request for Proposals
and in our design recommendations to be sensitive to your stated environ-
mental requirements. In addition to your request for basic services, we
have suggested improvements to the process which can save significant
amounts of schedule time and project cost.
For your convenience, we have capsulated our proposal in an Executive
Summary. Continuing in our proposal, we have furnished requested infor-
mation on our corporate experience and proposed project team (Section 2);
discussed a conventional and fast-track engineer/contractor approach and
permitting plan; furnished our concept for financing assistance (Section 3);
examined at some length four process design alternatives, including capital
and operating cost considerations as well as land use requirements (Section
4); described our thoughts on general contract terms and conditions (Section
5); and presented estimates for professional services, capital and operating
costs and suggested project schedules (Section 6).
In the Appendices we have furnished additional information including resumes
of our proposed project team, an initial wastewater characterization, our
design selection criteria, process flow diagrams, planning level process
specifications, planning level capital and operating cost estimates, and
speciman engineering and operations contracts.
We gave considerable thought to providing preliminary layouts for each pro-
cess system. However, because of the project's sensitivities to environ-
mental and neighborhood impacts and the relationship of the physical
improvements to the ultimate use of surplus district property, we concluded
that the development of conceptual layouts should be included in the prelim-
inary engineering phase as part of our recommendation of process options,
where we can combine efforts to address this important process -specific
issue.
A SUBSIDIARY OF THE PARSONS CORPORATION
PARSONS MUNICIPAL SERVICES, INC.
Mr. Dennis A. Erdman -2- August 9, 1988
It is not often that professional service firms are given the opportunity
to design, build, and operate a major wastewater treatment facility. With
Parsons unique combination of skills, corporate interest, and experience,
we sincerely welcome this opportunity. We can point with pride to a number
of projects where this approach has resulted in highly satisfied clients.
We feel that we are especially well prepared to offer our services to your
Authority by virtue of our past experience with similar, multiple agencies
and turnkey projects. Our team experience and capabilities in the permitting
area will be very helpful in obtaining required approvals. We are comfor-
table in providing a flexible set of options because we know that through
this process you will be best served in the end. We are confident that a
simple and reliable facility can be placed in service quickly and that the
Authority and its customers will benefit from our operations and management
skills.
wn lnn4 forward to the opportunity of meeting with you and the Authority
to further discuss this important project. If you have any questions or
require any additional information, please call me or Dennis Parker at
818-440-3141.
Very truly yours,
PARSONS MUNICIPAL SERVICES, INC.
Kline P. Barney, Or.
President
KPB/jc
7
n
•
I•
1•
CONTENTS
PARSONS -
Page
SECTION 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................... 1-1
1.1
Project Team and Related Experience ...................
1-1
1.2
Engineer/Contractor Approach ..........................
1-2
1.3
Design Concept ........................................
1-3
1.4
Contractual Terms and Conditions ......................
1-4
1.5
Project Costs and Schedule ............................
1-4
1.6
Conclusion ............................................
1-7
=713N 2 PROJECT TEAM AND RELATED EXPERIENCE .........................
2-1
2.1
Summary ...............................................
2-1
2.2
Parsons Corporate Team ................................
2-1
2.2.1 Wastewater Design, Permitting, and
Environmental Management .....................
2-3
2.2.2 Wastewater Facilities
Construction Services ........................
2-8
2.2.3 Wastewater Operations ........................
2-12
2.2.4 Subcontractors ...............................
2-15
2.3
Key Personnel .........................................
2-15
2.4
Detailed Resumes ......................................
2-17
SECTION 3 ENGINEER/CONTRACTOR APPROACH ................................ 3-1
3.1 Summary ............................................... 3-1
3.2 Conventional Approach ................................. 3-2
3.3 Fast-Track/Turnkey Approach ........................... 3-6
3.4 Permitting and Environmental Assessment ............... 3-10
3.5 Project Financing ..................................... 3-12
3.5.1 Assumptions .................................. 3-12
3.5.2 Financing Structure .......................... 3-13
3.5.3 Financing Assistance ......................... 3-15
SECTION 4 DESIGN CONCEPT .............................................. 4-1
SECTION 5 CONTRACTUAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS ............................ 5-1
5.1 Summary ............................................... 5-1
5.2 Conventional Engineering Services ..................... 5-1
5.3 Fast -Track Engineering/Construction Services.......... 5-2
5.4 Operations ............................................ 5-2
ISYD/1682 iii
•
•
•
•
C
1•
CONTENTS (Contd)
PARSONS—
Page
SECTION 6 PROJECT COST AND SCHEDULE ................................... 6-1
6.1
Summary ...............................................
6-1
6.2
Preliminary Engineering ...............................
6-1
6.3
Design Engineering ....................................
6-1
6.4
Construction Coordination .............................
6-2
6.5
Construction Cost .....................................
6-2
6.6
Operating and Maintenance Costs .......................
6-2
6.7
Fast Track ............................................
6-2
6.8
Project Finance .......................................
6-2
6.9
Schedule ..............................................
6-4
APPENDICES
A Parsons Qualifications ...................................... A-1
B Selection Criteria .......................................... B-1
C Wastewater Characterization ................................. C-1
D Alternative Process Descriptions ............................ D-1
E Computer Models and Mass Balance Diagrams ................... E-1
F Cost Estimate Summaries ..................................... F-1
G Life Cycle Cost Summaries ................................... G-1
H Specimen Contracts .......................................... H-1
FIGURES
1-1
Summary of Estimated Capital and Operating Costs............
1-5
1-2
Proposed Schedule ...........................................
1-6
2-1
The Parsons Organization ....................................
2-2
2-2
Proposed Project Team .......................................
2-16
3-1
Conventional Procurement Model ...... ..... .................
3-3
3-2
Engineer/Contractor Approach: Option 1 - Conventional
Procurement .................................................
3-4
3-3
Fast -Track Procurement Model ........ ..... ................
3-8
3-4
Engineer/Contractor Approach: Option 2 - Fast -Track
Procurement ... .............. ...... ..... ...............
3-9
3-5
Tax -Exempt Municipal Lease - Letter of Credit ...............
3-14
4-1
Summary of Estimated Capital and Operating Costs for
Alternative Treatment Processes .............................
4-3
6-1
Summary of Estimated Costs.. .............................
6-3
6-2
Conventional Procurement Schedule ...........................
6-5
6-3
Fast -Track Procurement Schedule .............................
6-6
ISYD/1682 iv 080888
•
•
TABLES
CONTENTS (Contd)
PARSONS-
Page
2-1 Selected Parsons
Experience in
Design of Wastewater and
Water Treatment
Plants ......................................
2-5
2-2 Selected Parsons
Experience in
Construction Sources for
Wastewater and Water Treatment
Plants .......................
2-9
2-3 Selected Parsons
Experience in
Operation of Wastewater
Treatment Plants
............................................
2-13
LI
•
•
�1
[7
SYD/1682
1•
v
0
I•
I•
I•
1•
PARSONS -
SECTION 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.1 PROJECT TEAM AND RELATED EXPERIENCE
Parsons has assembled a highly qualified team of professionals to implement
the Authority's new wastewater treatment facility. All principal team members
are employees of Parsons and have extensive experience working together on
similar projects. The team is Southern California-based, affording quick and
easy access to the Authority, its member agencies, regulatory agencies, and
the public. Our team is fully experienced in both conventional and fast-track
engineer/contractor approaches. Our principals have actively followed the
development of this project over the past 18 months and we are well aware of
the technical, environmental, neighborhood, and institutional issues that must
be addressed.
In recognition of the importance Parsons places on this assignment, Mr. Kline
P. Barney, President of Parsons Municipal Services Inc., will serve as our
senior management representative and will provide liaison between the
Authority and The Parsons Corporation.
Our project principal is Nicholas L. Presecan, Senior Vice President of
Engineering -Science, who will be responsible for the project's engineering
direction, technical process evaluation, and quality assurance. Permitting
responsibilities will be carried out by Dr. Paul E. Smokler, who has extensive
experience with all regulatory and review agencies involved with the project
for permitting and environmental approvals. Dr. Smokler will be assisted by
T.J. Meadows, who has extensive first-hand knowledge of the area and its water
quality needs. Preliminary design will be directed by David L. Sullivan, who
is also President of Parsons wastewater facility operations group. Mr.
Sullivan is intimately familiar with the Victoria and SERRA facilities, both
from design and operations standpoints.
Final design will be performed by Joseph C. Reichenberger, who is a Vice
President and Manager of Engineering -Science's Western Region Operations. Mr.
Reichenberger can assure priority for the completion of final design. Kenneth
J. Deagon will bear responsibility for construction services. Mr. Deagon is
now implementing a fast-track wastewater facility for Casa Grande, Arizona.
If the Authority desires Parsons' assistance in the area of Project Finance,
these services will be provided by Dennis D. Parker, who has participated in
over $200 million in water and wastewater infrastructure financings. Mr.
Parker will work directly with the Fuji Bank and Marubeni -America Corporation
to develop a unique credit enhancement tool.
Parsons overall wastewater experience during the past 5 years includes design
of 28 facilities with a constructed value of $810 million; construction
services for 32 wastewater facilities with a constructed value of over
SYD/1682 1-1 080888
PARSONS -
$1.3 billion; and operating responsibilities at 29 facilities with a combined
treatment capacity in excess of 290 mgd. Many of these projects involve
turnkey approaches and/or multiple agency authorities as client.
1.2 ENGINEER/CONTRACTOR APPROACH
Parsons is committed to furnishing the Authority with the most reliable, cost-
effective, and operator -friendly facility possible. The facility will be laid
out and designed to be a "good neighbor". Allowing for future changes in
regulatory requirements, volume increases, and interactions with SERRA are
important goals. We also recognize the desire of the District to retain land
for future productive economic uses, and will incorporate ideas for achieving
this goal in our preliminary design.
We are experienced in both conventional and turnkey fast-track
engineer/contractor approaches and have recently implemented projects using
both methods. In a conventional approach, we will perform preliminary design,
including further evaluation of process options, obtain requisite permits, and
prepare final design and plans/specifications. We will coordinate general
• contractor bidding, recommend awards, and perform resident
engineering/construction administration services. We will perform startup and
operate the facility according to the Authority's desires. We will guarantee
the design performance of the facility for as long as we provide operating
services. We are confident that, subject to events within our reasonable
control, the conventional approach can be implemented within 32 months of
Notice to Proceed. This schedule is 7 months faster than the schedule
• indicated in the RFP.
We have also suggested a fast-track engineer/contractor approach that we
believe can be implemented within the framework of the Authority's RFP and
procurement regulations. In this approach, we would substitute final design
for the development of a series of specific performance bids for individual
• "hard money" items, and perform construction management services directly.
Subject to conditions within our reasonable control, we believe the fast-track
option can result in a 25 -month performance schedule from Notice to Proceed.
This approach will save 7 months when compared to the proposed conventional
schedule, and 14 months when compared to the schedule set forth in the RFP.
n
L
�•
If the Authority desires, we will furnish a guaranteed maximum price and
guaranteed construction schedule as part of the preliminary engineering
report. If accepted by the Authority, we will then proceed with the fast-track
option. Individual hard -money contracts will be bid and the Authority will
benefit from savings below the guaranteed maximum price. The Authority will be
able to see actual bids and verify prices and costs. In exchange for the
guaranteed maximum price and schedule, we will propose an incentive fee
arrangement that reflects savings achieved for cost and schedule.
A decision on conventional or fast track can be made at the conclusion of
preliminary engineering when the merits of each approach can be fully
determined by the Authority.
We are prepared to work with the Authority to obtain credit enhancements for
the project debt. If such arrangements involved the issuance of variable rate
SYD/1682 1-2 080888
•
A
PARSONS -
debt, our associates (including the Fuji Bank and Marubeni -America) would
• discuss arrangements to limit the exposure of the Authority to short-term
interest rate fluctuations.
1.3 DESIGN CONCEPT
Parsons is committed to design a facility that meets the Authority's
environmental requirements for:
o Odor and nuisance control.
o State-of-the-art technologies to minimize operations and maintenance
requirements and maximize reliability.
• o Simple and cost-effective operations.
o Consideration of residuals disposal systems to meet present and future
disposal requirements and regulations.
To meet these important goals, Parsons has examined both suspended -growth and
• fixed -film biological treatment processes. For suspended -growth systems, we
have investigated two process systems: (1) conventional activated sludge and
(2) sequential batch reactors. For fixed -film systems, we have examined two
process systems: (1) biotowers and (2) submerged biological contactors. In the
process of this evaluation, we have also considered variants including the AO
process and the Schrieber process, which we have concluded fall within the
• performance and cost ranges for the four selected systems.
For each process system, we have prepared a process flow diagram, and
completed mass balances and preliminary process element specifications. We
have submitted each process to an EPA 201 planning -level computer cost
evaluation, and have estimated costs on a life -cycle basis. The results of our
• investigations are summarized in Section 4 and detailed in Appendixes E, F,
and G.
Based upon life -cycle cost analysis, the following ranking emerged, using
assumptions set forth in the body of the proposal:
• o Submerged Biological Contactors
I•
C:
- $11,928,00 capital
- $336,000 annual 0&M
o Biotowers
- $12,145,000 capital
- $344,000 annual 0&M
o Conventional Activated Sludge
- $13,446,000 capital
- $656,000 annual 0&M
SYD/1682
1-3
PARSONS -
o Sequential Batch Reactors
- $10,235,000 capital
- $1,012,000 annual ODM
Upon Notice to Proceed, we will further refine our process assessment and
recommend the system that best meets the Authority's overall goals and
objectives.
1.4 CONTRACTUAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Parsons is highly flexible regarding contractual terms and conditions. Section
5 outlines three general approaches that can be considered in implementing
. this assignment:
o Conventional Engineering Services Master Agreement
o Fast -Track Amendments to the Engineering Services Master Agreement
o Operating Services
In Appendix H we have furnished specimen copies of a conventional engineering
• services master agreement and an operations service agreement. In Section 5,
we discuss special features association with fast track. These special
features include:
A
0
I0
o A guaranteed maximum capital cost
o A guaranteed in-service date
o A comprehensive design performance warranty
o Assumption by Parsons of Parsons -initiated change order costs
o A targeted hard -money bidding/negotiations program
o Incentive fee arrangements to improve on cost and schedule performance
All principal assignments would be performed by subsidiaries of The Parsons
Corporation.
1.5 PROJECT COSTS AND SCHEDULE
In Section 6, we outline our cost estimates for the performance of preliminary
engineering, including a guaranteed maximum price and schedule option,
conventional final design and bidding administration, and construction
services. We also provide engineering estimates of capital and annual
operating cost for each system, based on uniform pricing assumptions. Our fee
will be influenced by the process ultimately selected and the complexity of
design, plans, and specifications involved. Figure 1-1 summarizes the
project's estimated costs.
Experience indicates that our fast-track approach should save approximately
15% of the total design and construction management costs. We describe several
incentive mechanisms to motivate the maximum achievement of savings in cost
and schedule. We further describe a process for evaluating the performance of
our credit enhancement and financing work and tying such compensation to
savings actually achieved by the Authority. Figure 1-2 presents a proposed
schedule for the conventional and fast-track approaches.
SYD/1682 1-4 080888
I•
G
..
m
� d
N
M +
C
N
i
N
N
14
C N
ro"
N
m
m
O
7
N
v
a
C
M
M
ro
N
d
o
d
N
N
CO)
°
a
•
2 I
c
c�
ro
+>
P.
ro
V
�
ro
d
�'
F
•
Go
ro
E
N
W
w
0)
w
ro
c
d
Q
a A
o
t~
a
o
LL
ro
of.
E
of
d
E
d Oa
N
to -
I•
G
..
m
� d
N
M +
C
N
i
N
(r
C N
ro"
m
m
m
7
N
m
a
c E
wl
O•+
2 I
M ro
c�
m
m
a
N
Q
a A
o
a d
of.
Fc
of
d
w o
d Oa
Ri
to -
{�
d^
m
m
m
m
43 N
m
m
m
m
7 O
°m
to
O N
O O)
a
o
cam
C C
'O a
N
O`
{f
3.
A
ON
rl
C
N .�
as
C ro
m
N
N
m
O �
�i
rl
.•1
N
v
W
iR
tR
N
�a
�N
to
U)
n
W
m
c d
roV
of.
E
d toGo
ad
N
N d A
d
O A
N
z
ro ••�
O C
4f ro G
a c
v ro
o E ro
^
•4
V
^
N
V
0
U
N
i.
�
O
'� d
IA
Go 0
N G
o
a to
d
°
Go
to
U
N
U
OI c
O
c N
d
+�d
wQ
3a
tin`
�q
e o
a
°
v Q
d
M
m
1-5
A.
� d
N
M +
C
N
i
N
(r
C N
ro O
m
U
m
a
O•+
2 I
M ro
a A
o
a d
of.
Fc
of
d
w o
d Oa
Ri
to -
{�
N
c N
C
U •�
V N
'O N 1R
N
O
7 O
°m
to
O N
O O)
a
o
cam
C C
'O a
•� d .1
o
d
3.
A
N In
- o
o•.
roc
as
d
A
d A
O {� M
A f+
7 E
o N
-�•�
dA O
N N
ro 43
++ ro °
�a
�N
to
O •+
9
M d to
0.0
d
d h
of.
E
d toGo
c 41
N
N d A
O A
N
ro ••�
O C
4f ro G
a c
v ro
o E ro
^
•4
V
^
N
V
^
m
V
N
C
O
N
N
to
a
•
r1
U
n
u
77
0
0
�
7
7
T T
RI •••1
•M
4' a
L
a L
dc
+1 d d
A
L A 9
� d d
A F u
3 y
t,
T d O
Y +� d
w A N
A m a
N h
A a
c 3
A A
i. m
N
a m
A �
v
to
\
n
b�
C
M
yJ
'O
U
o+
9
7
M
N
N
0�
O+
N
co
H
co
V)
m
\
�•I
1
el
O
& k
d
v
0 a
A 04
vai
d
m
b�
C
1-6
N
N
Y
0 4
O O
i.
0.�
c
w Y
o E
a
Y O N
v.. c
c d O
+� d 43
d V
U d •�+
vow
+� U
T U d
(� N
m d
d c O
C C
O
a of N
7 c
N A
'O C ..
Y O 0.
N "
A N d
A A U
O c
Y C A
� E o
dow
U d d
d
0
0
z
M
yJ
'O
U
9
7
M
N
.i
N
N
C
v
O
& k
d
v
0 a
A 04
vai
d
a
3
a a
N
7
I
A
o
a
ti
A
N
1-6
N
N
Y
0 4
O O
i.
0.�
c
w Y
o E
a
Y O N
v.. c
c d O
+� d 43
d V
U d •�+
vow
+� U
T U d
(� N
m d
d c O
C C
O
a of N
7 c
N A
'O C ..
Y O 0.
N "
A N d
A A U
O c
Y C A
� E o
dow
U d d
d
0
0
z
J
1 PARSONS -
1.6 CONCLUSION
4 I
Parsons is pleased to be considered for this important assignment. We believe
that our feelings are evidenced by the time and energy we have expended in
understanding the Authority's needs, both technical and governmental. We stand
ready to perform the services outlined herein without delay. We look forward
to establishing a specific program for creating a functional facility that
stresses simplicity, cost effectiveness, and reliability, and is in every
sense a good neighbor.
•
•
•
Ll
I.
SYD/1682
10
1-7
SECTION 2
PROJECT TEAM AND RELATED EXPERIENCE
•: 2.1 SUMMARY
PARSONS—
This section presents the background and expertise of Parsons for the
Capistrano Valley Water Authority project. Detailed information on our related
design, construction, and operations and maintenance experience is included in
three tables in Subsection 2.2. Subsection 2.3 introduces the key personnel
who will perform the project; detailed resumes are included at the end of the
section.
2.2 PARSONS CORPORATE TEAM
Since its founding in 1944, Parsons has grown to become one of the world's
• leading engineering, construction, and project development organizations.
Parsons has provided professional services on thousands of assignments around
the world in such areas as petroleum and chemical processing, minerals and
mining, aerospace and defense, and all aspects of urban infrastructure
development. Project assignments have included engineering, procurement, and
construction of over $6 billion in Alaska oil production facilities; program
• and construction management for the development of a new city of 150,000
persons at Yanbu, Saudi Arabia; and design or construction management of over
$2 billion in municipal water and wastewater system improvements. The Parsons
Corporation is consistently ranked by Engineering News -Record magazine as one
of the top three contractors, designer -constructors, and program/ construction
managers.
•
•
1•
16
The Parsons Corporation is comprised of a number of wholly owned subsidiaries,
each a leader in its field of expertise. Principal Parsons subsidiaries
include The Ralph M. Parsons Company; Engineering -Science, Inc.; De Leuw,
Cather & Company; Chas. T. Main, Inc.; Barton Aschman Associates; and Parsons
Municipal Services, Inc. The Parsons Corporation is wholly owned by its
employees, thus giving each employee a tangible interest in client satisfac-
tion and repeat business. For the services offered to the Capistrano Valley
Wastewater Authority, The Parsons Corporation would be represented by Parsons
Municipal Services, Inc. Figure 2-1 provides a diagram of the overall Parsons
organization.
Over the past decade, Parsons has emerged as a leader in the area of municipal
infrastructure in communities across the United States. Early on, Parsons
recognized the need, among its municipal clients, for an organization that
could fold a wide range of expertise under a single project development
umbrella. In addition to technical expertise in the field of planning, design,
and construction, Parsons has found that providing operating services and
project finance capabilities helps its municipal clients define, finance, and
implement their required facilities on schedule, within budget, at the lowest
possible cost.
SYD/1682 2-1 080888
k
\
u
k
I
k
PAASONS-
|
IH
;�
.
§
|!,||
�§\
•!
�|
!I
,!
!ZO
�|
|■!
|�
/!
■�
!§■
��
!|
\�\\
/{
\!
�\
k
\
u
k
I
k
PAASONS-
|
IH
;�
.
§
|!,||
�§\
•!
�|
!I
,!
!ZO
�|
|■!
|�
-
!§■
��
!|
!■
!
£&1682 2-2 080888
IH
;�
§
|!,||
k�z
,!
!ZO
�|
)
!
£&1682 2-2 080888
IH
;�
■)
|!,||
!
£&1682 2-2 080888
IH
;�
#
,!
!ZO
�|
)
!
£&1682 2-2 080888
IH
;�
#
!ZO
)
!
£&1682 2-2 080888
W
PARSONS -
Today, Parsons is the recognized industry leader in the field of
• public/private partnerships of new municipal wastewater facilities. Since
1983, Parsons has financed in excess of $170 million in municipal wastewater,
water treatment, and cogeneration facilities, and nearly $500 million in
surface transportation projects. Parsons efforts at privatization have
attracted national attention. The nation's first privatized wastewater
treatment facility, a 5-mgd plant at Chandler, Arizona, has provided the model
•^ for many other communities. A similar 5.5-mgd system for Gilbert, Arizona, was
constructed as a turnkey project and put in service less than a year after the
sale of bonds. In Pelham, Alabama, PMSI owns and operates a sewerage
collection and treatment system for a city of 18,000; this sewerage plant was
also a turnkey project. In Downingtown, Pennsilvania, PMSI's client is a five -
city wastewater authority. ES is now completing the construction of a turnkey
wastewater project for the city of Casa Grande, Arizona.
Parsons finance/design/build/operate activities are carried out by Parsons
Municipal Services, Inc. (PMSI). The subsidiary is based at The Parsons
Corporation's World Headquarters in Pasadena, California. PMSI's wastewater
treatment project experience and qualifications are presented in Appendix A.
• 2.2.1 WASTEWATER DESIGN, PERMITTING, AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Parsons sanitary and environmental engineering, permitting, and design
services are carried out by Engineering -Science, Inc. (ES). ES is the engineer
of record for more than 100 new or expanded expanded wastewater treatment
plants across the world. These facilities range in size from domestic U.S.
• plants processing less than 1 mgd of wastewater to a system treating more than
250 mgd in a developing country. ES has designed facilities to provide
primary, secondary, and tertiary wastewater treatment, and to deal with
special problems including stringent discharge limitations, large industrial
waste streams, odor control, constrained facility sites, and phased
improvement or replacement of existing facilities.
•
ES has been selected to design and build this great variety of wastewater
treatment plants because of its proven record of achievement over the past
40 years and because of its comprehensive list of services. In addition to
providing master planning, feasibility studies, design, engineering and
construction services, ES offers plant startup, staff training, operations
manuals, and complete operation and maintenance services.
ES also provides highly specialized services including the design of treatment
processes that allow wastewater reuse for recreational or agricultural
purposes, and oceanographic studies and design of submarine outfall disposal
systems. In conjunction with other Parsons Corporation subsidiaries, ES also
designs and provides operation and maintenance services for privately owned
and operated municipal wastewater treatment facilities.
ES is among the few international design and consulting firms with
comprehensive air quality and air pollution control capabilities. From basic
problem identification through complete permitting and compliance assistance,
ES provides professional services that result in quick, efficient solutions to
air quality problems. ES service capabilities in the air-quality field
include:
SYD/1682 2-3 080888
PARSONS—
o Meteorology and atmospheric engineering
Atmospheric measurements
Detached/in-plume sampling
- Tracer analyses
- Downwind monitoring
Site evaluations
o Modeling services for:
- Major new sources
- Variances from existing regulations
- Energy conversion impact analysis
• - Implementation plans
o Field services
- Ambient monitoring
- In -plant surveys
- Dispersion model validation
•
ES also offers a wide range of technical, management, and consulting service
to help federal, state, and local governments, as well as private industry,
deal with environmental concerns. Blending the skills of more than
30 scientific and engineering disciplines, ES personnel provide assistance
with virtually every technical, financial and socioeconomic aspect of an
• environmental issue. The firm's list of services include:
o Program and project planning
o Feasibility studies and reports
o Regulatory compliance analysis
o Environmental impact statements and reports
• o Audits and compliance reviews
o Field investigations
o Comprehensive environmental assessments
o Expert testimony
•
I•
1•
1•
ES's reputation rests on its record of providing unbiased and balanced
environmental reporting. The company has the ability to respond to individual
needs and problems, evaluate the environmental consequences of a project,
develop cost-effective mitigating procedures, and monitor compliance with
permit requirements.
A recent summary of ES wastewater treatment design experience is furnished in
Table 2-1. All projects listed were either initiated or completed within the
past 5 years. ES has recent design and/or preliminary engineering experience
with each of the process alternatives outlined in this proposal.
SYD/1682 2-4 080888
PARSONS -
4
O
0
a
L
m
q O
>
C
U
Y L
—
O
L
2 L
1
O N L 2p
T
W
LO P
—iLN
1
1
1
•O
�11Opm
=Y�
m
N m q U1
O N t O V
t
T t \
L t
N
t L m
i U O b
L i b
U <ry
pt
W
wzi F,
Z UN
+EEc
m0 t
�
O
v
N
L V
L U
L U
m K
m
J \
L
L
rz
U
dC
O
' E
J
L
W
CL d
o
N.3
E
r�
La
L'� F
cS v
M c.
n
m
dl
O
a
r
m
3
OI
m
td
6.
0+
L
pL`
P
C
N
ty
L
d
d
d N
Cl)0d
a
m
1
m
t m
P
ry
yl
� 3
mLm
CU
dca
+O
EE
d
N
w
<
O
F
yy
N
10
H E
1
vOi
IAV
f�V
a
t
G
O
m
f
q
+
v
— p
v N
+=
& O
t P
m
+ p
—
Lp0
C
• L
W
q q —L
o f
t T
q
n
O
L% m 0
0.
m
C CJ
S
O W >
P
0
QE U
D
YU O
m u 0
• N C
U} pj �.
1j
O
q q
q
<
J; Q
L L 9
m C }
O
m C N
C t
LL
q
O}v
v 2
m
N 9
q
O
cCL
O
0.
m~
v<
o a
< o O T
L O
O O
O
s O
q 0
V t
L n np GOE
} tpp O t
m g T q
T
+ n
No
T
p
o
S N
U
2
< U
SYD/1682
2-5
080888
PARSONS—
ccO
u
d
v
j Q
L
Y�
O
U
N
N
L <<
F N
L
N O t
c
d
tin
Lm
rn ma
_—
rn—
�n
coq
no
v'v}iy1p
dy
n o<
r —&
c Z S v o
+ O t a i
S q N
n a n
C
COtN
Z q
N 9 OI
C m P�p
> UCSD
T cp
O
V I_ P
= E 1Mp
L L CSD
C
N}
—
—O_ YNI—
OL
10
CD >>J N
T O q P
J L L l M
J p1 —d m
t T L
O C\
L t N t\
0
p\ppO
p
Nm
Ep yO p
YUPO�O
mSUdN
CmmO N
FU' UO�O
W YSCDW
N 6
O
O
t
t
W U
U
U
v
d 0
+ O
d U E
c
LQ
'O
c
`o
a
L)
�o
n
N40
d
o"
d
4!
CpC75
�
H
a
ro
F
�o
m
O�
t
^
N
<
m
N D
L
O
U
t
L
6
S
N
q N O1
h
N
n
O
iL N
t
.O
c
c
c q
c
1u
q q
q
q
q
C
O. M
a E
n
d
O.
c
O. f
0
>
oC <
O T q
T
tE t
C J
C
ECd
EdC
t
N
p
00 tmm
O
O 0 d
Ib
E
4
d
067
d 0d
O e 0
OSS
01—
O T
9
q_
Q O �'
c
Y_ C-
O
•r
C
4
O
m 0 0
i N
s 0 0
t 0 0
s—
OT
O
dJ
}C
tUUT
♦qC
¢T�
VI i
N p t
N6 2
YI }
0
N—
N—
_
3 cc U
S W S
U U
= U U
2 W
SYD/1682
2-6
080888
SYD/1682
-PARSONS-
P
Q
P
P
r
A
+
+ o
U
L
A O
C
v
dL
U
p
oO
0
O.r
~
_
A a
a
x
+
o
a r
A tm my
LO
d 0
m
0
o
x
+
S E m
A O
■ a
N
N
L
A
>
0 E
m
g c
m L
A
0
L A
L A
SHa
22
y0
5E
y
8
2IL
FLa
2-7
-PARSONS-
PARSONS—
2.2.2 WASTEWATER FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
During the past 5 years, Parsons has constructed or provided construction
services on wastewater facilities with a value in excess of $1.3 billion.
Parsons provides comprehensive construction services and construction
management capabilities to government and industry in domestic and foreign
markets on projects of any size or complexity.
Services are provided to construction programs that range from low-cost
assignments to multibillion -dollar mega projects, and offers the attention of
a Southern California presence plus the financial resources provided by The
Parsons Corporation.
Parsons has an active field staff and craft labor force capable of undertaking
construction projects of any size on a direct -hire basis. Management systems
technology, utilizing some of industry's most advanced computers and software,
can be employed to achieve maximum manpower productivity. Schedules, budgets,
and sequential construction activities are planned and monitored to produce
completed projects on time and within budget. Parsons construction
subsidiaries are available to provide construction services on a union or
merit -shop basis, as appropriate.
Parsons recent construction services experience in wastewater treatment
facilities is summarized in Table 2-2.
•
•
SYD/1682 2-8
•
PARSONS -
Table 2-2 - Selected Parsons Experience in Construction Services
• for Wastewater and Water Treatment Plants
Is,
•
J
�•
Project and Client
Westerly Water Pollution
Control Facility,
Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer
District, Cleveland, Ohio
Water Treatment Plant,
Cairo, Egypt
Wastewater Treatment
Plant Expansion,
Coachella Valley County
Water District,
Palm Desert, California
Wastewater Treatment Plant,
Pipelines
15 Pump Stations, and
2 Ocean Outfalls,
Colombo, Sri Lanka
Wastewater Treatment Plant
Expansion, Borough of
Downingtown, Pennsylvania
4 Primary Treatment Plants,
Pump Stations, Tunnels,
and Ocean Outfalls,
Municipal Corp. of Greater
Bombay, India
Water Treatment Plant,
Oceanside, California
Constructed
Cost
($ million)
SYD/1682 2-9
•
Reference
105 Erwin Odeal or
Charles Vasulka
Northeastern Ohio
Regional Sewer
District
Cleveland, OH
216/881-6600
110
2.5 Tom Levy
General Manager
CVWD
619/398-2651
61
10.4 Don Greenleaf
Borough Manager
Borough Hall
4 W. Lancaster Ave
Downingtown, PA 19335
215/268-0344
350
6.8 Mike McGrath
Operations
Superintendent
City of Oceanside
619/727-0790
•
s
•
•
J
•
•
I•
Table 2-2 (Contd)
Constructed
Cost
Project and Client ($ million
PARSONS -
Reference
Wastewater Treatment Plant,
45 -
Pipelines, Water Treatment
Plant, and Pump Stations,
Kathmandu, Nepal
Pipelines, Pump Stations, and
38 -
Water Treatment Plant,
Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia
Wastewater Treatment Plant
50 -
Expansion, 3 New Wastewater
Treatment Plants, and
Pipelines,
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Wastewater Treatment Plant,
27 Earl Martin
Rocky River, Ohio
City of Rocky River
216/331-0600
Wastewater Treatment Plant, 11
Friendswood, Texas
Wastewater Treatment Plant, 1
Expansion,
Charles City, Iowa
Wastewater Reclamation Plant, 22
Chandler, Arizona
Wastewater Treatment Plant,
Gilbert, Arizona
SYD/1682 2-10
•
City of Charles City
105 Milwaukee Mall
Charles City, IA 50616
Dennis Willemssen
515/228-1846
B. Metzler
Public Works Director
City of Chandler
200 E. Commonwealth Ave
Chandler, AZ 85224
602/899-9772
14.5 Kent Cooper
City Manager
119 N. Gilbert Rd
Gilbert, AZ 85235
602/892-0802
PARSONS -
Table 2-2 (Contd)
Project and Client
Wastewater Treatment Plant
and Collection System,
Pelham, Alabama
Municipal Waste Treatment,
East Bay Municipal Utility
District,
Oakland, California
Municipal Waste Treatment,
Taipei Area Sewerage
Department,
Taipei, Taiwan
Wastewater Distribution System,
Zurn Industries
Guayaquil, Ecuador
Hyperion Energy Recovery System,
City of Los Angeles, CA
•
•
SYD/1682
I•
Constructed
Cost
($ million
Reference
11 Bobby Hayes
Mayor
City Hall
Pelham, AL 35124
205/663-3901
45 -
25 -
6 -
200 Ralph Kennedy
Hyperion Construction
Division Engineer
7660 W. Imperial Hwy
Playa del Rey, CA 90293
213/615-4001
2-11
PARSONS -
2.2.3 WASTEWATER OPERATIONS
•
Parsons is a major providor of wastewater operating services. These services
include plant startup, ODM manuals, operation and maintenance, training, and
trouble -shooting. In response to growing client interest, we currently provide
full-service operations at wastewater treatment facilities with design
capacities ranging from 1 to 30 mgd. Our recent corporate experience includes
• operating assignments at 29 municipal facilities with a combined average daily
capacity in excess of 290 mgd. We have specific operational experience with
each of the design process operations presented in this proposal. Parsons
recent wastewater operating experience is summarized in Table 2-3.
•
:7
I•
C
SYD/1682 2-12
•
PARSONS -
Table 2-3 - Selected Parsons Experience in Operation of
Wastewater Treatment Plant
Client
Type of Treatment
Capacity
(mgd)
Reference
Chandler, AZ
Activated sludge with
5
B. Metzler
tertiary facilities
Public Works Director
200 E. Commonwealth Ave.
Chandler, AZ 85224
602/899-9772
Gilbert, AZ
Oxidation ditches for
5.5
Kent Cooper
secondary treatment
City Manager
602/892-0802
Downinaton, PA
Advanced secondary
4.0
Don Greenleaf
extended aeration
Borough Manager
Borough Hall
Downingtown, PA 19335
215/268-0344
Pelham, AL
Extended aeration
1.0
Bobby Heyes
Mayor
City Hall
Pelham, AL 35124
205/663-3901
CdH Sugar Company
Activated sludge, anaerobic
Jake Shpak
Crockett, CA
digesters
CdH Sugar Co.
Crockett, CA
415/787-2121
Millidgeville, GA
Trickling filter
7
-
General Electric
Plastic waste
9
-
Company
Mt. Vernon, IN
General Motors
Metal removal
0.25
CPC Group
Corporation
3900 Motors
Doraville, GA
Industrial Way
Doraville, GA 30360
John Connally
404/455-5334
General Motors
Industrial wastewater
1.5
CPC Group
Lakewood, GA
treatment
P.O. Box 1655
Atlanta, GA 30321
Bridget Reisinger
404/624-2733
Rocky River, Ohio
Municipal wastewater
25
Earl Martin
treatment
City of Rocky River
216/331-0600
SYD/1682 2-13 080888
PARSONS -
Table 2-3 (Contd)
Capacity
Client Type of Treatment (mgd) Reference
Cleveland, Ohio Lime clarification, dual
media pressure filtration
Jefferson Parish Extended aeration
Louisiana activated sludge
Gulf Coast Waste
Activated sludge, aeorbic
Disposal Authority
digestion of paper product
Houston, TX
wastes
Big Sister Creek
Activated sludge, phosphate
Angola, NY
removal
San Clemente, CA
Activated sludge, filtration
and incineration
Atlanta, GA
Nitrification, activated
sludge and aerobic digestion
Eli Lilly Co.
Load equalization, activated
Carolina and Mayaguez,
sludge
Puerto Rico
Albany, OR
Activated sludge, anaerobic
digestion and vaccum
filtration
Ashtabula, OH
Activated sludge, anaerobic
digestion and vacuum
filtration
Valley Sanitary
Activated sludge and wet -air
District
oxidation
Indio, CA
Baskin Robbins
Activated sludge and
Southbury, CT
filtration
Glendale, CA
Phosphate removal and
filtration
San Juan
Activated sludge, anaerobic
Capistrano, CA
digestion with ocean
disposal
SXD/1682 2-14
•
50.0 Erwin Odeal or
Charles Vasulka
Norheastern Ohio
Regional Sewer District
Cleveland, OH
216/881-6600
30.0 Pedro Rivera
Jefferson Parish
Dept, of Public Works
504/736-6669
44 -
4
4
5
1
5
12
5
0.245
3.9
9
Gabriel Garcia
809/834-7846
PARSONS -
2.2.4 SUBCONTRACTORS
Virtually all program assignments envisioned in this proposal will be carried
out by units at Parsons. However, given the importance of time and the desire
for rapid permit approvals, we have associated with Meadows Consulting Group,
Inc., to assist with permitting, intergovernment liaison, and public
involvement. Mr. T.J. Meadows will furnish these services under the direction
• of Nicholas L. Presecan, an Project Principal. Mr. Meadows brings to our team
a wealth of background and knowledge of participants in South Orange County.
Surveys or geotechnical investigations will be performed by subcontractors. We
await a decision by the Authority regarding its selection of a soils and
geotechnical consultant. Ideally, the selected consultant and its work can be
• readily assimilated into our work program.
2.3 KEY PERSONNEL
Parsons has made a concerted effort to bring together a highly qualified
project team to carry out this important assignment. Each individual has
• extensive experience and qualifications for his portion of the work. Beyond
this individual experience, our team has worked together on a wide range of
wastewater assignments over the past 5 years. We know each other and have
evolved efficient interpersonal skills in related assignments.
Figure 2-2 provides an organization chart for our proposed key personnel,
• indicating each individual's role and their reporting relations.
Given the potential breadth of the Authority's assignment (i.e., project
financing assistance, design, permitting, construction services, and
operational), we believe that a senior officer should play a continuing role
in maintaining communication with the Authority. We propose that Kline P.
Barney, Jr., serve in the capacity of Parsons Corporate Sponsor. Mr. Barney is
• President of Parsons Municipal Services, Inc. Prior to his current assignment,
Mr. Barney was President of ES. He has over 25 years experience with ES and
Parsons, is a registered engineer, and is based in Southern California.
Overall program management will be the responsibility of Nicholas L. Presecan,
Senior Vice President for Engineering Direction with Engineering -Science.
• Mr. Presecan is based in Southern California. Mr. Presecan's current duties
involve company -wide responsibilities for engineering procedures and new
technologies, quality assurance and quality control, technology transfer and
development of technical personnel, and trouble -shooting on major projects.
Mr. Presecan has been an employee of ES since 1968. Mr. Presecan will serve as
t Project Principal.
•
Mr. Presecan will direct the critical environmental assessment and permitting
activities effort headed by Dr. Paul E. Smokler. Dr. Smokler is a registered
engineer, based in Southern California, with over 12 years of experience with
all aspects of planning and implementation of environmental regulatory
experience. His particular areas of expertise include CEQA/NEPA compliance,
• governmental agency liason, and environmental criteria development for large
SYD/1682 2-15 080888
I•
aS
§
§
a
�
Q
§
,�
i■
���
.:
�.|
J
LL-
�R
,.|
\
00
.■
-
!
f
2
!!|
aS
§
§
a
�
PARSONS -
engineering projects. Dr. Smokler has company -wide management responsibility
• for environmental impact assessments, environmental planning, permitting, and
il regulations compliance.
T.J. Meadows will report to Mr. Presecan and assist Dr. Smokler in project
permitting, intergovernmental liaison, and public involvement.
Dennis D. Parker will report to Mr. Presecan and provide services related to
+ project economics, rate and user charge impact assessments, economic
3 assessments of water reclamation, and other cost/revenue matters. Mr. Parker
will also coordinate the Parsons financing assistance program, if such
assistance is desired by the Authority, Mr. Parker has over 14 years
experience in municipal and enterprise fund capital budgeting, management of
• public capital assists, and municipal finance. Mr. Parker has a master's
. degree in Urban and Regional Planning and is based in Southern California.
Bruce L. Beal will report to Mr. Presecan and provide services relating to
contracting services and legal/administrative matters. Mr. Beal has over
10 years of experience in contract planning, negotiation, and formulation,
involving construction, business, and real estate. Mr. Beal has practiced
40 contract law and is based in Southern California.
Specific responsibility for preliminary engineering will be assigned to David
L. Sullivan. Mr. Sullivan is a registered sanitary engineer, with over
26 years of experience in the design and operation of wastewater treatment
• facilities. Mr. Sullivan has been with ES and Parsons since 1972, and in
addition to his extensive design experience, he is President of Parsons
wastewater facilities operating subsidiary. Mr. Sullivan will also be
responsible for startup activities and plant operations, if desired by the
Authority.
Final engineering responsibility will be assigned to Joseph C. Reichenberger.
• Mr. Reichenberger is ES's Vice President for Western Region Operations.
Mr. Reichenberger is a registered engineer with 22 years experience in
planning, design, and construction control administration of water supply,
treatment, and distribution systems; wastewater collection, treatment, and
disposal systems; industrial wastewater treatment and pretreatment systems;
and storm water collection. Mr. Reichenberger has 19 years of experience with
• ES and Parsons and is stationed in Southern California.
I•
I7
Construction services will be assigned to Kenneth J. Deagon, ES's Manager of
Construction Engineering. Mr. Deagon is based in Southern California and has
11 years of experience in construction engineering on both domestic and
overseas projects. Mr. Deagon's experience includes both fast-track and
conventional engineer/contractor approaches, and involves both field and home
office aspects of design, craft supervision, material takeoff, subcontracting,
planning, scheduling, and materials control. Mr. Deagon is familiar with both
merit -shop and union contracting environments.
2.4 DETAILED RESUMES
Resumes are provided on the following pages for the key Parsons personnel
discussed above.
SYD/1682 2-17 080888
KLINE P. BARNEY, JR.
PARSONS-
PARSONS SPONSOR
Over 25 years of experience in the design, construction, operation, financing,
and administration of civil engineering projects.
} EDUCATION
�i Master of Public Administration, San Diego State University. H.S., Civil
Engineering, University of Utah.
EXPERIENCE
o PRESIDENT, Parsons Municipal Services, Inc., 1985 to present.
Responsible for contracts to design, build, finance, own, and operate
municipal facilities through privatization and other financing
techniques. Projects include wastewater treatment and reclamation
facilities for the cities of Chandler, Arizona (5 mgd) and Gilbert,
Arizona (5.5 mgd); 3-mgd wastewater treatment plant for the borough of
Downingtown, Pennsylvania; 1-mgd collection system and treatment plant
for the city of Pelham, Alabama; plus cogeneration and other municipal
facilities.
o PRESIDENT, Engineering -Science, Inc. 1981 to 1985. Directed all aspects
of major (900 employees) full-service environmental -civil firm in
worldwide operations.
o EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT, Engineering -Science, Inc. 1973 to 1981. Chief
operating officer of worldwide engineering operations.
o CHIEF ENGINEER, Engineering -Science, Inc., 1971 to 1973. Responsible for
all reports, studies, and designs.
o PROJECT MANAGER, Engineering -Science, Inc., 1963 to 1973. In responsible
charge of a wide variety of civil and sanitary engineering projects,
including water and wastewater treatment plants, water reclamation
activities, dams, pump stations, outfalls, and other major facilities.
• o ASSISTANT CHIEF ENGINEER, Fallbrook Public Utility District, San Diego,
California, 1960 to 1963. Responsible for all aspects of water system
operations including assisting in preliminary design of the Santa
Margarita River Dam project.
�0
10
o CAPTAIN, U.S. Marine Corps, 1957 to 1960. Combat engineer officer
serving as platoon leader, assistant company commander, and assistant
battalion S-3 officer.
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Registered Professional Engineer in 33 states; Diplomate, American Academy of
Environmental Engineers; Member: American Society of Civil Engineers, American
Water works Association, and California Water Pollution Control Association.
1 of
SYD11682
•
NICHOLAS L. PRESECAN
PARSONS -
PROJECT PRINCIPAL
Over 20 years of experience in planning, design, and construction of water
supply, sewerage, and industrial waste facilities. Direct responsibility for
supervision of multiple projects company -wide and the management of company
offices throughout the western United States. Responsible for technical review
programs of major projects.
EDUCATION
M.S., Sanitary Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, 1967. B.S.,
Civil Engineering, Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana, 1963. California
• Institute of Technology, Project Management Course, 1978; Certificate in Value
Engineering, ACED/AIA.
EXPERIENCE
o SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT/MANAGER OF ENGINEERING DIRECTION, Engineering-
, • Science Inc., 1987 to present. Responsible companywide for engineering
procedures and new technologies, quality assurance and quality control,
technology transfer and development of technical personnel, and
troubleshooting of problems on major projects.
o GROUP VICE PRESIDENT, Engineering -Science, Inc., 1984 to 1987.
• Responsible for directing the firm's civil, sanitary, and environmental
study and design activities, and managing the firm's offices throughout
the western U.S.
•
K7
o VICE PRESIDENT, INTERNATIONAL DIVISION, Engineering -Science 1981 to
1984. Responsible for directing the firm's international study, design,
and construction projects, managing overseas project development, and
supervising division activities.
o VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF ENGINEER, Engineering Science, 1972 to 1981.
Responsible companywide for technical review of major civil design and
construction Droiects.
o DESIGN OFFICE MANAGER, Engineering -Science, 1970 to 1972. In charge of
all plant designs, studies, and engineering activities. Responsible for
design and construction of pilot plant facilities and design of
physical/chemical treatment facilities, conventional biological
treatment plants, and interceptor sewers.
o CIVIL AND SANITARY ENGINEER, Engineering -Science, Inc., 1968 to 1970.
Involved in water and waste treatment and water reclamation/reuse
studies and designs. Prepared designs of conventional and advanced waste
treatment facilities and water filtration plants. Responsible for
design, development, and operation of computer programs for the solution
1 of 3 NLP
• SYD/1682 080588
PARSONS -
NICHOLAS L. PRESECAN (Contd)
of complex engineering problems involving analytical problem solving,
facility component design, and economic studies. Other projects included
design and construction of pilot treatment facilities for chemical and
petroleum industry waste applications.
o OFFICER IN CHARGE, U.S. Marine Corps, 1964 to 1966. Served in aviation
electronics equipment repair group. Responsible for development and
evaluation of various aircraft equipment and associated ground support
equipment and facilities, as well as management of the group avionics
maintenance activities.
• o PROJECT ENGINEER, San Bernardino County Flood Control District, 1963.
Engaged in planning, analysis, and design of flood channels, box
culverts, holding basins and reservoirs, spillways, and associated
hydraulic structures. Responsible for development of engineering
computer programs and operation of a digital computer system.
• PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Registered Professional Engineer in Alabama (13064), Arizona (14076),
California (C19981), Colorado (17620), Connecticut (12209), Delaware (5934),
Florida (31522), Georgia (9505), Illinois (62-30325), Indiana (14541), Iowa
(7764), Kentucky (8113), Louisiana (18974), Maryland (8621), Massachusetts
(27589), Michigan (92-19778), Minnesota (15186), Mississippi (8412), Nevada
(5938), New Jersey (GE28130), New York (51521), North Carolina (10248), Ohio
(E35583), Pennsylvania (19166-E), South Carolina (5794), Texas (42290), Utah
(5580), Virginia, (6875), Washington (19781), West Virginia (8802), and
Wisconsin (E-20968).
• Certified Value Engineering Team Coordinator (GSA/EPA). Member, American
Society of Civil Engineers, American Water Works Association, Building
Officials and Code Administrators International, Inc., National Council of
Engineering Examiners (No. 5035), National Society of Professional Engineers,
Society of American Value Engineers, and Water Pollution Control Federation.
• PUBLICATIONS
"A Pilot Study of Physical -Chemical Treatment of the Raw Wastewater at the
Westerly Plant in Cleveland, Ohio," Water Research, Vol. 6 (Pergamon Press,
1972), pp. 619-626 (Coauthors A. J. Shuekrow, W. I. Bonner, and E. J.
Kazmierczak).
•
"Cleveland Westerly Physical -Chemical Wastewater Treatment Facility Design
Features," American Society of Civil Engineers Conference proceedings, and
presented at Specialty Conference on Nutrient Removal - How to Do It,
Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York, 28 June 1972 (Coauthor
C. J. Touhill).
•
2 of 3 NLP
• SYD/1682 080588
Ll
0
40
�0
�40
�0
10
PARSONS—
NICHOLAS L. PRESECAN (Contd)
"Why Recalcine?," Proceedings of Third Annual Environmental Engineering and
Science Conference, Louisville, Kentucky, March 1973 (Coauthors M. A. Sweet
and M. W. Albury, Jr.).
"Trends in Sludge Disposal," Official Proceedings of PEECON '73, Pollution
Engineers and Equipment Conference, New York, New York, 22 May 1973•
"Design of an Ozonation System for a Wastewater Treatment Facility - A Case
History," Proceedings of First International Symposium on Ozone for Water and
Wastewater Treatment, Washington, D.C., December 1973 (Coauthors J. S. Jain
and M. A. Sweet).
"Outlook for Water and Wastewater Systems, Processes, and Equipment," Water
and Wastes Engineering, January 1981 (Coauthor R. L. White).
PAPERS AND PRESENTATIONS
Over 20 papers and presentations to engineering societies, technical
conferences, and universities.
3of3
SYD11682
PARSONS -
PAUL E. SMOKLER, Ph.D. PERMITTING
Over 12 years of experience with all aspects of planning and implementation of
environmental regulatory compliance. Direct experience with petrochemical,
energy, civil, and government projects. Particular areas of expertise include
CEQA/NEPA compliance, government agency liaison, and environmental criteria
development for large engineering projects.
EDUCATION
PH.D., Environmental Science and Engineering, University of California, Los
Angeles, 1981; M.P.H, Environmental Management, University of California, Los
• Angeles, 1976; B.A., Zoology, University of California, Los Angeles, 1973•
REGISTRATION
Registered Sanitarian, California.
• EXPERIENCE
o SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER, Engineering -Science, Inc., 1982 to present.
Management responsibility for environmental impact assessment,
environmental planning, permitting, and regulatory compliance on large
petrochemical and civil projects. Key projects include an EIS for a 1100
• mile pipeline, offshore oil field developments, and program management
for a grassroots marina.
o PROJECT MANAGER, The Ralph M Parsons Company, 1980 to 1982. Participated
in large-scale energy development projects such as oil -shale and gas -
processing plants. Responsible for regulatory compliance, permit
• preparation, environmental protection planning, preparation of technical
reports, field investigations, and liaison with regulatory agencies.
Environmental work in connection with an industrial city being
constructed in Yanbu, Saudi Arabia, included a comprehensive
environmental baseline studies/monitoring program and the project's
environmental plan.
•
I•
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER, The Ralph M. Parsons Company, 1978 to 1980.
Participated in several energy, transportation, and defense projects.
Responsible for environmental permitting, design review and
incorporation of environmental regulatory requirements, construction
surveillance planning, field monitoring for environmental quality
assessment and environmental impact protection programs.
PROJECT ENGINEER, University of California, Los Angeles, 1977 to 1978.
Participated in a project studying the institutional barriers to
wastewater reuse in Southern California. Delineated impacts of economic
and fiscal policies on project feasibility for freshwater supply and
wastewater reclamation.
1 of 2 PES
• SYD/1682 080588
•
PARSONS -
PAUL E. SMOKLER, Ph.D. (Contd)
•
o PROJECT PHYSICIST, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 1977. Coordination and
integration responsibilities for chemical kinetic modeling under the
Space Storable Propulsion Systems Technology Program. Stratospheric and
Ionospheric modeling was performed to assess Space Shuttle impacts in
compliance with NEPA requirements.
•
o ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST, Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, 1976
to 1977. Headed a program to develop electronic data processing for a
marine biological monitoring program. Applied statistical techniques to
redesign monitoring program for increased sampling efficiency.
• o FIELD RESEARCH SCIENTIST, Southern California Coastal Water Research
Project, 1973 to 1976. Responsible for the design and implementation of
monitoring programs to quantify the input of chlorinated organics into
the Santa Monica Bight and for completion of technical reports on
results of research.
• PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Member, National Association of Environmental Professionals and American
Association for the Advancement of Science, President, Environmental Science &
Engineering Society.
• PUBLICATIONS
Author or coauthor of 9 technical articles and presentations.
J
•
•
•
2of2
SYD/1682
•
m::
PARSONS-
DENNIS D. PARKER PROJECT ECONOMICS
•
Over 10 years of experience in municipal government, especially in the areas
of community development, capital improvement programming, and management of
municipal capital assets, and 4 years in the development of public/private
arrangements for wastewater, water treatment, cogeneration, and transportation
• infrastructure.
EDUCATION
M.A., Urban and Regional Planning, Pacific Urban Studies and Planning Program,
University of Hawaii, 1973. B.A., American Studies, University of Hawaii,
• 1969.
EXPERIENCE
o MANAGER, PROJECT DEVELOPMENT, Parsons Municipal Services, Inc., 1985 to
present.
• o DIRECTOR OF CAPITAL RESOURCES, City of Scottsdale, Arizona, 1983 to
1985.
o MANAGER, Land and Property Management, City of Scottsdale, 1982 to 1983.
o PRINCIPAL PLANNER/ASSISTANT TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEAD,
• City of Scottsdale, 1981 to 1982.
o PRINCIPAL PLANNER, Long Range Planning, City of Scottsdale, 1976 to
1981.
o SENIOR PLANNER, LONG RANGE PLANNING, City of Scottsdale, 1975 to 1976.
•
o PLANNER, LONG RANGE PLANNING, City of Scottsdale, 1974 to 1975.
o MANAGER, QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS DIVISION, Hawaii Environmental Simulation
Laboratory, University of Hawaii, 1971 to 1974.
• PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials, International
Right of Way Association.
•
•
1 of 1 DDP
• SYD/1682 080588
BRUCE L. BEAL
Over 10 years of experience in contract
involving engineering, construction,
estate. Member of the Bar in Oregon.
EDUCATION
PARSONS -
PROJECT CONTROLS
planning, formulation, and negotiation
operation and maintenance, and real
J.D., Northwestern University School of Law, 1975. B.S. (with honors) in
Chemistry, Biology, and Psychology, Lewis & Clark College, 1970.
EXPERIENCE
• o SENIOR CONTRACT SPECIALIST, The Ralph M. Parsons Company, 1988 to
present. Contract Administrator for ongoing wastewater treatment
facility design/construct/operate projects at Gilbert, and Chandler,
^^=zona; Pelham, Alabama; and Downingtown, Pennsylvania.
Responsibilities include preparation and negotiation of contracts for
• design and construction, joint venture agreements, agency agreements,
assignments, and novation agreements. Prepares commercial provisions
such as indemnity, warranty, payment, damages, and guarantees.
o ATTORNEY, (private practice), Lincoln City, Oregon, 1978 to 1988.
Primary emphasis of practice included contract planning, negotiation,
and formulation involving construction, business, and real estate.
• Experience included dispute resolution, including litigation.
Specialized experience included drafting of custom general contractor
agreements, General Counsel for survey and engineering firm, and Counsel
for condominium registration work. Member of Oregon State Bar committee
on natural resources and subcommittee to reform the Uniform Building
Code to allow alternate energy technologies and methods.
•
o ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY AND LAW CLERK, 1974 to 1978. For law firm
specializing in corporate, securities, business, and federal law, was
responsible for giving advice on compliance with governmental
regulations. Duties included drafting of contracts. Taught legal -writing
techniques to law students.
•
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Lincoln County Bar Association Vice President, 1980; Natural Resources
fi Subcommitte Appointment, Oregon State Bar, 1979 and 1980.
•
1 of 1 BLB
• SYD/1682 080588
DAVID L. SULLIVAN
PARSONS -
FACILITIES OPERATIONS
Over 26 years of experience in wastewater treatment facility design and
operation. Involved in the operation of over 50 waste treatment plants
worldwide and more than 20 treatment plant designs (types ranging from simple
primary to complex biological and physical chemical processes). Responsible
for conducting many training programs for municipal governments and private
industry. Has performed numerous research projects, involving advanced waste
treatment such as reverse osmosis, nutrient removal, and carbon treatment.
Associated with two "Outstanding Plant of the Year" awards from the California
Water Pollution Central Association.
EDUCATION
Science and Engineering, Ventura College, 1963; Sanitary Engineering,
International Correspondence School, 1964.
Registered Professional Engineer in California (C35514), Licensed Grade V
Operator in California (V278).
EXPERIENCE
o CHIEF OF OPERATIONS, Engineering -Science, Inc., 1972 to present.
• Technical Director for all treatment plant operations activities,
including preparation of operation and maintenance manuals, operator
training programs, and process operations consulting. Responsible for
the review of designs and construction plans with respect to operation
and facility startup for major projects. Operation consulting activities
involve numerous domestic and industrial waste treatment systems as well
as extensive involvement with federal and state agencies pertaining to
grant programs and permits.
�•
I.
1•
10
SUPERINTENDENT, San Pablo Sanitary District, 1971 to 1972. Initial
duties during construction included supervising final stages of
construction, staffing the facility, training the personnel, and placing
facility in operation for a complex 16.5-mgd waste treatment plant
designed to treat domestic and exotic industrial wastes. In addition,
the treatment process developed a comprehensive source control program
for industrial waste discharge, and a unique new process for control of
pH of nitrified activated sludge effluents and dechlorination.
o TRAINING CONSULTANT, Environmental Protection Agency, 1970 to 1971.
Established the first comprehensive training program for wastewater
treatment plant operators in California (taught at Santa Barbara City
College for two years). The program was coordinated with the federal
government, State of California Water Quality Control Board, Regional
Water Quality Control Boards, and State Department of Public Health.
1 of 3
SYD/1682
PARSONS -
DAVID L. SULLIVAN (Contd)
SUPERINTENDENT OF SANITATION, City of Ventura, California, 1960 to 1969.
Responsible for directing the operation of wastewater treatment
facilities, a water reclamation plant, twelve pumping stations, and
approximately 300 miles of sanitary sewers. Additional duties included
design and inspection of major projects and direction of many technical
studies and research projects to enhance knowledge of existing staff and
to improve efficiency of operation. Served as Director of State Health
Approved Laboratory certified for complete bacteriological and chemical
analyses. Performed all the oceanographic work connected with the
installation of a new submarine outfall for the city. Participated in
the design and selection of pipe for subject outfall. Served as resident
engineer and inspector on the project which involved underwater
inspection. Also designed a special mixing nozzle on the outfall
diffuser to accomplish a high initial dilution factor.
o CONSULTANT, 1961 to 1972. Maintained a diverse operations research
consulting company. Consulted with governmental agencies, engineering
firms, and private industry. Activities included treatment process
consultation, oceanographic surveys, subaqueous pipeline inspection,
effluent monitoring, plant start-up, operator training, industrial waste
treatment, electroplating plant design, treatment plant design, soil
studies with respect to pesticide damage, water and sewage process
problems, laboratory design, master plans, and food processing design.
0 APPLIED RESEARCH PROJECTS
1�
1•
1!
Conducted numerous applied research projects resulting in solutions to many
waste treatment problems. Author of several technical articles, including EPA
publication. Research projects have included:
o Biological control of hydrogen sulfide in sludge lagoons: Developed a
method for controlling or eliminating hydrogen sulfide emission. Use of
Chromation bacteria was developed.
o Identification of specified coliform organisms: Established a technique
and procedure for rapid identification of Escherichia coli by
bacteriophage typing.
o Water reclamation: Investigated use of secondary treated effluents,
Including effects on soil, soil organisms, and botanical life. The study
resulted in the development of a 27 -hole golf course and recreational
lakes.
o Integration of trickling filters with activated sludge: Constructed and
operated a 0.1 mgd pilot plant for 2 years to determine the feasibility
of this system producing a highly purified effluent for reclamation. The
project resulted in construction of a 15-mgd facility.
2 of 3 DLS
SYD/1682 080588
4
PARSONS—
DAVID L. SULLIVAN (Contd)
•
o Reverse osmosis treatment: In conjunction with DuPont, a system was
developed to produce a demineralized potable water from sewage. The
process not only involved reverse osmosis but filtration, chemical
coagulation, and carbon absorption.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
3of3
• SYD/1682
DLS
080588
JOSEPH C.
PARSONS -
FINAL ENGINEERING
Over 22 years of experience (over 10 in direct project and department
management) in the planning, design, and construction of water supply,
treatment, and distribution systems; wastewater collection, treatment, and
disposal systems; industrial wastewater treatment and pretreatment systems;
and storm water collection systems. Knowledgeable in pressure and open channel
hydraulics.
EDUCATION
M.S., Civil Engineering, University of Southern California 1967; B.C.E, Civil
Engineering, Marquette University, 1964. Additional courses and seminars in
• Flood Control Hydrology, Advanced Wastewater Treatment, and Specification
Writing.
REGISTRATION
Registered Civil Engineer in California (18034). Certified Grade V Operator in
• California.
•
[7
I•
I•
1•
J*
EXPERIENCE
MANAGER, WESTERN OPERATIONS, Engineering -Science, Inc., 1986 to present.
Responsible for technical and administrative review of all design
projects and for supervising mechanical, electrical, and structural
engineers and drafters. Served as project manager for additions to the
Railroad Canyon wastewater reclamation plant and Horsethief Canyon
wastewater reclamation plant. Served as technical director for the
Gilbert, Arizona wastewater reclamation, and the Chung -Chow wastewater
treatment facilities, and industrial wastewater pretreatment facilities
for Hughes Aircraft Company, Northrop Corporation, and Darnell Plating
Company.
o PROJECT MANAGER, Engineering -Science, Inc., 1979 to 1983• Supervised
design of the industrial wastewater treatment facility for IBM in
Tucson, Arizona, and expansion of the Malibu Mesa wastewater reclamation
facility. Served as task manager and technical director for design of
nominal 25-mgd water filtration facility for Three Valleys Municipal
Water District. Managed a water recycling and reuse study for McDonnell
Douglas Corporation. Supervised Belmont Shores sanitary sewer system
evaluation survey, Long Beach, California. Managed the Unit A wastewater
interceptor replacement project in the City of Thousand Oaks and the
design of the secondary treatment solids handling system and tertiary
filtration system for the Palm Desert water reclamation plant.
o MANAGER OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, Daniel, Mann, Johnson &
Mendenhall (DMJM), 1978 to 1979. Responsible for design of the Malibu
Mesa wastewater reclamation plant. Supervised a wastewater reclamation
and reuse study for several facilities in California. Managed hydraulic
1 of 2
SYD/1682
JCR
080588
•
PARSONS -
JOSEPH C. REICHENBERGER (Contd)
•
design study for a submarine outfall in British Columbia, and a
radioactive liquid waste collection system project for the Department of
Energy.
• o PROJECT MANAGER, DMJM, 1975 to 1978. Responsible for water resources
element of the western San Diego and Riverside Counties 208 plan and the
design of water supply, distribution, pumping, and storage system and
wastewater treatment and reuse systems.
o PROJECT ENGINEER, DMJM, 1971 to 1975. Responsible for the preliminary
design of water wells, raw water pipeline, electrodialysis/reverse
osmosis water treatment systems, water distribution and storage system,
and wastewater treatment facility for a military complex in Saudi
Arabia. Designed an interceptor sewer replacement for the City of
Thousand Oaks and a wastewater collection and pumping station and
stormwater collection, detention, and pumping system for Modesto
Community College. Responsible for technical direction of three water
• quality control plans for river basins in California.
o CIVIL ENGINEER, DMJM, 1967 to 1971. Project engineer for several major
drainage and flood control projects and flood plain inundation studies.
tj o SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSISTANT, Los Angeles County Flood Control
•! District, 1964 to 1967. Involved in the structural and hydraulic design
of large flood control and drainage systems.
' o STUDENT ENGINEER, Wisconsin State Highway Commission, 1962 to 1963.
' Construction survey and inspection of highway grading, paving, and
drainage and bridge structures.
IPROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
i Member, American Academy of Environmental Engineers (Diplomate), American
Society of Civil Engineers, American Water Works Association, and California
Water Pollution Control Association.
r
I•
I•
Papers and Presentations
"Use of Polymers in the Coagulation Process," presented at the American Water
Works Association Annual Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, June 1983 (Coauthor D.
R. Kasper, Ph.D.).
"Pretreatment of Metal -Bearing Wastewaters" presented at the Southern
California Chapter of Consulting Chemists Association, September 1985.
"An Overview of Wastewater Treatment Technologies" presented at California
Aerospace Environmental Association, July 1986.
I2 of 2 JCR
• SYD/1682 080588
KENNETH J. DEAGON
Over 12 years of experience in costruction
projects. Involved in all phases of
activities including design, craft
subcontracting, planning, scheduling, and
PARSONS -
CONSTRUCTION COORDINATION
engineering of foreign and domestic
field operations and home office
supervision, material takeoff
materials control.
• EDUCATION
M.B.A., Finance, University of Southern California, 1982; B.S. Mechanical
Engineering, University of Notre Dame, 1976; B.A., Liberal Arts, University of
Notre Dame, 1975. Licensed California General Engineering Contractor "A" and
Building Contractor "B".
•
EXPERIENCE
o MANAGER OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING, Engineering -Science, Inc., 1986 to
present. Responsible for the technical direction of the company's
construction operations, including construction management, resident
• engineering, construction cost estimating, and quality control/quality
assurance.
o MANAGER OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING, Parsons Constructors Inc., 1984 to
1986. Responsible for the company's effort construction operations,
including field engineering, project controls, precontracts, bids,
•! proposals, quality control/quality assurance, systems and methods, site
mobilization/demobilization, computer operations, and project support.
I•
[7
I•
1•
10
o SECTION MANAGER, Parsons Constructors Inc., 1981 to 1984. Responsible
for company's effort of planning, scheduling, estimating, cost control,
and computer applications. Traveled to projects to assist and improve
existing field operations.
o STAFF ENGINEER, Morrison-Knudsen Saudi Arabia Consortium, 1977 to 1980.
Responsible for the engineering support of the Construction Operations
Division, including design, scheduling, and logistics. Coordinated the
field material engineers into one cohesive unit, achieving improved
material control. Supervised 12 engineers. Established procedures for
material takeoff and control of government -furnished property. Developed
staff for domestic materials control support.
o ENGINEER, Morrison-Knudsen Company Inc., Valdez, Alaska, 1976 to 1977.
Responsible for scheduling of lubrication and preventive maintenance of
500 pieces of heavy equipment. Reduced turnover from 52 men per year to
less than one man per month. Supervised a crew of 15 to 20 service and
crane oilers.
1 of 1
SYD/1682
KJD
080588
• 3.1 SUMMARY
•
I•
r
I•
10
1•
PARSONS -
SECTION 3
ENGINEER/CONTRACTOR APPROACH
Parsons understands the Authority's desire to place in service a
conservatively designed wastewater treatment facility to serve the wastewater
customers of the City of San Juan Capistrano and the Capistrano Beach Sanitary
District. Parsons further understands the Authority's desire to have the
facilities completed quickly, efficiently, and at the lowest responsible cost.
We believe the Authority's desires can be best met through a rigorous review
of available treatment processes, a positive approach to permitting and public
involvement, an evaluation of life cycle costs, and performance guarantees
that the selected firm will furnish.
Cost and quality are significantly affected by the approach the
engineer/contractor pursues in implementing the design, permitting,
construction, and operations of the proposed facilities. Several options are
available to carry out the engineer/contractor assignment.
We believe there are two general engineer/contractor approaches that meet the
Authority's procurement requirements. These engineer/contractor approaches can
be refined during the preliminary engineering phase of the project. The first
approach involves preparing preliminary design (or Basis of Design Report),
final plans and specifications, bidding the plans and specifications to
qualified wastewater facility general contractors, determining the general
contractor with the lowest responsible bid, and providing
coordination/oversight of the general contractor's work. This approach is
referred to as the "conventional" approach.
The second approach is a modified version of turnkey that we refer to as "fast
track", wherein the selected engineer/contractor prepares a preliminary
engineering Basis of Design Report, develops multiple bid packages (i.e.
civil/structural, mechanical/electrical, architectural finishing, etc.) for
"hard money" items, and manages the multiple contractors on behalf of the
Authority on a professional services incentive fee basis. When properly
conceived and executed, the fast-track approach can reduce the
design/construction period outlined in the RFP by up to 14 months (25 months
versus 39 months) and result in capital cost savings.
In comparing the two approaches, Parsons believes that the fast-track approach
offers several important advantages:
o Places the facility in service faster, reducing financing costs
including capitalized interest, depending upon when the debt is placed,
and construction cost escalation.
SYD/1682 3-1 080888
PARSONS—
o Increases bidding competition for specialty contracts. Parsons can
• eliminate middlemen, deal directly with vendors and specialty
contractors, and negotiate prices or terms with successful low bidders
on a contract -by -contract basis.
o Passes through savings to the Authority. Individual specialty contract
a savings can be used to retire bonds.
o Transfers responsibility for designer/contractor change orders resulting
from design process changes from the Authority to Parsons. Parsons will
warranty the design.
The realization of these advantages depends upon the engineer/contractor's
capability to carry out a more sophisticated program management function
• involving engineering, permitting, procurement, and construction disciplines,
x and the Authority's comfort level with a high level of interaction with the
engineer/contractor during preliminary design and the development of specialty
contract performance specifications. In evaluating fast-track and conventional
approaches, the Authority may wish to consider the engineer/contractor's
capacity to make meaningful performance guarantees. Parsons will negotiate a
• project document that includes:
o Guaranteed maximum capital cost at the completion of preliminary design
Basis of Design Report, subject to the report and conditions within
Parsons reasonable control.
o Guaranteed in-service date significantly sooner than available through a
conventional procurement, subject to conditions within Parsons
reasonable control.
o Umbrella plant performance warranty for our 5 -year operating term
wherein Parsons will guarantee effluent quality subject to our design,
construction, and operations responsibility.
o Guaranteed O&M budget for the operating term.
The decision to proceed with conventional or fast-track procurement does not
have to be made immediately. Parsons suggests that this decision be made at
the conclusion of preliminary design. The Authority can then weigh the merits
of each approach and direct us to follow the approach that offers the greatest
overall benefits to the Authority and its wastewater customers. In the
subsections that follow, we will discuss each approach in greater detail.
3.2
Parsons is well qualified to provide the Authority with a full spectrum of
professional services associated with a conventional project engineering
assignment. The principal elements of this approach are shown in Figures 3-1
(Conventional Procurement Model) and 3-2 (Engineer/Contractor Approach: Option
1, Conventional Procurement). The conventional approach includes preliminary
engineering, permitting, final engineering (with a 50x design product and a
90% design product), final plans and specifications, assistance in managing
SYD/1682 3-2 080888
I•
I•
I•
I•
I•
I•
13-3
•
N
c
0
N
N
ro
a
d
a
a
LL
^^
ad
h d
ro a
++ o
o
I
d
Q
�I
^
N
N d
C
O ►>
O
d ro
U
V1 •.�
d
N^LL
e b
Ja
c
ro c N
O
E
a.0°a
,
N ^
ro M
c3
c.
ro d
•.�
ti
d
o
A
I
a
cma
P4
m^
C 3
0
W d
Y7
4
da
I
a`
,,
c
a
a
A
c
0
ae
++
c
c
d
f
++
O
w
W
W
O
7
43 ++
i�
iq ro
to N
0
Go
41°
c
M a
a
a
0
0
U
13-3
•
N
c
0
N
N
ro
a
d
a
a
LL
•
1•
1•
S]Fm � E:
a
Fs
} Eacs.�.,E.ic
F
I• 3-4
Z
O
F
W
a
a
0
u
O
F
W
E
F
A
W
N
a
a
a
a
F
O
F
.:
ii
:, i •
e i p ;
} Eacs.�.,E.ic
F
I• 3-4
Z
O
F
W
a
a
0
u
O
F
W
E
F
A
W
N
a
a
a
a
F
O
F
A
I*
PARSONS -
general contractor prequalification, construction bidding, construction
coordination, startup services, and operations.
During preliminary design, we will further refine our assessment of process
options to the degree desired by the Authority and make final recommendations
of the process that optimizes effluent quality, lowest overall life cycle
cost, and environmental acceptability. We will thoroughly examine the
costs/benefits associated with providing reclamation -quality effluent, both
initially and at a future time, on a process -specific basis. We will also
consider economic tradeoffs regarding land requirements for each process and
the potential for revenue generation on remaining surplus District property.
The preliminary report will include design criteria, process and
instrumentation diagrams, mass balances, and single -line electrical/mechanical
drawings, and a preliminary user charge impact study.
These recommendations will be presented with a proposed facility layout plan
with suggested architectural elevations. The site layout plan will address
internal circulation and access options that optimize the entire District real
estate holdings. De Leuw, Cather & Company, a wholly owned Parsons subsidiary
which specializes in transportation engineering, is available to examine
options for improving a secondary access point across the railroad easement,
if desired. Architectural renderings will be prepared for use in public
presentations to demonstrate a visual and aesthetic sensitivity to local area
residents and businesses. We anticipate a physical appearance similar to
existing newly constructed light industrial uses.
The layout and process recommendations will provide for potential upgrade to
reclamation water quality standards and sufficient redundancy/capacity to
accommodate weekend and seasonal peak flows and for more stringent future
regulatory standards, as well as future plant expansion.
Options for solids management, including joint operations with the SERRA
facility, will be assessed. One such option would include the technical and
economic aspects of power generation utilizing higher volumes of dewatered
sludge. Parsons subsidiary Chas. T. Main, Inc., has internationally recognized
credentials in the field of power generation, and ES is a recognized national
authority in the field of sludge management.
The preliminary engineering will include field survey and geotechnical studies
that build upon work scheduled to be performed by the Authority, a wastewater
discharge report, and a permit acquisition plan. (Given the importance of
permitting, this area is discussed separately in Subsection 3.4.) We will
coordinate with appropriate municipal review agencies to expedite local agency
approvals. The preliminary engineering report will contain an estimated cost
for design/construction and operations, and a detailed project schedule. We
estimate the time required to complete preliminary engineering to be 50 to
60 days.
Upon acceptance of the preliminary engineering report, Parsons will proceed
with final engineering. We will prepare a 50% design report including greater
detail on plant layout, paving and grading, architectural elevations,
mechanical drawings, general provisions for specifications, and permit
acquisition status, and participate as required in public meetings. The 50%
SYD/1682 3-5 080888
7
[7
1•
PARSONS -
engineering report will update the capital cost and life cycle cost estimates,
as well as the project schedule and an update of the user charge impact study.
We estimate a 50- to 60 -day performance period for the 50% report.
We will produce a 90% engineering report. This report will propose near -final
drafts of the items included in the 50% report, and include value engineering
recommendations. The 90% report will also include a final cost estimate,
startup cost estimate, and 5 -year O&M estimate. The 90% report will provide
sufficient cost and schedule information to allow the Authority to obtain
project financing. We estimate a 75 -to 90 -day schedule for completion of the
90% engineering report, and 30 days for Authority review and acceptance.
Following Authority acceptance of the 90% engineering report, we anticipate a
60- to 75 -day period for preparation of project bid documents, coordination of
bidding (including general contractor prequalification), receipt of
construction bids, and recommendation for contract award. A Parsons entity
will submit a construction bid.
After the construction award, Parsons will provide construction coordination
services, monitor general contractor performance, inspect construction work in
progress, verify acceptability of fabricated and installed process equipment,
and administer the general contractor's payments from the construction fund.
Construction services and equipment procurement are estimated to take
20 months. During this period, Parsons will process change orders (if
required) and, subject to Authority approval, recommend compensation for
change orders. We will also prepare "as -built" (or "as -constructed") drawings.
As construction is completed, Parsons will provide plant startup services.
These services will include the preparation of an 0&M manual, rigorous testing
of all plant operating systems, consolidation of construction/vendor
warranties, and biological/chemical process stabilization. The estimated
performance period for startup is 60 days. Depending on the Authority's
desires, we will retain or recruit and train plant operators, or provide
training for the Authority's operators.
Parsons welcomes the opportunity to provide full-service plant operations for
up to 5 years. During this period, we will operate, maintain, and manage the
facilities and provide a comprehensive design performance warranty. Parsons
will provide lab services, ongoing technical support, staff training, and
periodic recommendations for modifications in response to changing operating
or regulatory requirements. Parsons is familiar with the existing Victoria
Plant operators and intends make every effort to provide these valued
employees with career opportunities on our operating team.
We plan to provide onsite office space for the Authority's management team and
locker/shower facilities for the Authority's (or its member agencies') line
maintenance crews. We believe this will encourage good relations between the
two workforces.
3.3 FAST-TRACK/TURNKEY APPROACH
Parsons experience demonstrates that the proposed facilities can be designed
and constructed on a fast-track basis. This more sophisticated approach has
SYD/1682 3-6 080888
PARSONS -
resulted in important benefits to other Parsons wastewater clients -- in terms
of cost, schedule, and performance warranties. Based upon discussions with
Authority staff and advisors, we believe conditions exist both politically and
practically for the Authority that suggest fast-track turnkey advantages can
be realized.
Figures 3-3 (Fast -Track Procurement) and 3-4 (Engineer/Contractor Approach:
• Option 2, Fast -Track Procurement) depict our approach to fast-track
procurement. The approach is based upon a project development model presented
by Parsons to the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development in
Washington, D.C.
The primary distinction between conventional and fast track is the
• substitution of final engineering and general contractor bidding with fast-
track design and procurement. This substitution can result in a significant
reduction in the overall design/construction schedule.
As a supplement to the preliminary engineering report, subject to conditions
within Parsons reasonable control, Parsons will provide a guaranteed maximum
• project construction cost and completion schedule. Based upon this
information, the Authority's financial advisors may place project financing
earlier than under the conventional approach. The preliminary engineering
report will be performed interactively with the Authority's staff and advisors
over a 50- to 60 -day period (the same time frame as Option 1). The preliminary
report will contain all the elements identified in Subsection 3.2 above.
• If, after review of the preliminary engineering report, the Authority directs
us to pursue a fast-track implementation process, Parsons will prepare
performance specifications for major hard -money contracts. We envision the
following hard -money contract bids:
o Grading and earthwork
• o Structural concrete
o Process equipment
o Instrumentation
o Electrical
o Mechanical/plumbing/HVAC
o Yard piping
• o Paving
o Architectural specialties
Parsons will screen prospective bidders for prequalification, obtain bids, and
negotiate final prices, terms, and conditions with the hard -money contractors.
Savings obtained through bidding and negotiation can be accumulated and used
to redeem project debt, upon completion of the project. The bidding process
will be open to the Authority, so that the Authority's representatives can see
all submitted bids.
If the Authority directs us to undertake a fast-track process, we will
recommend an incentive fee arrangement to encourage maximum hard -money bid
savings. One approach might provide Parsons a percentage of savings
negotiated, or actually achieved, below the low bid amount for each hard -money
SYD/1682 3-7 080888
•
•
T T
0 rl
�•O ,O
LL
Q
'N
•
C
M Y y
E
M
d A h
♦+ 7
N v
a
to
ti 3 X
3
,. v
A Y d
N
�F
0
•
M dL
r I
N .
m �
v
•
•
3-8
•
N
c
0
N
N
m
a
Y
a
LL
«
n
a
a
a
a?
w
2
42
«
N
O
w
�
N
.
I
N
p
U
d
N
w
•tl
N ^
•
C N
•
A +1
'" .
+
c
d d
X
i
ca
N
v
3
AA as
�
a
3
.i X
O d
A v
o
A
M
N
a
ti
Go
v
a
o0
3
Q
" �^
• c3
W Y
N
da
a
• a"
v I
N
so
T
a
od
C
C a
Y
42O
W
fe CA
O
'I
y
4
M
M S/
IdI� Jf
11
A
r
T
A
O
4
N
a
Q
a
d
NO
a
a
O
�
a
3-8
•
N
c
0
N
N
m
a
Y
a
LL
■
e
D
e
e
J
e
l0
F
le
.
§
!
!
■
!�l��!{
!
k
|
|
k
•|!|!/|||�|���•'�|||
k
|
,.
|
M
§
§�1
k
�
a
(
�
-
«�|
■
!
jLL
IA
�r(
;|,
;41_
IA
}\0
�
n
|al�
2
�
)§I
\kok
{
�
jGo
Go
\�
r
rLU
!|
.
�II|.,-.!!
• . |.|_��'!.|:�'•
■ _ z!|,||��||!�!|.
§
!
!
■
!�l��!{
!
�II|.,-.!!
• . |.|_��'!.|:�'•
■ _ z!|,||��||!�!|.
7
m
ON
LL
§
!
!
§
!
k
;
k
•|!|!/|||�|���•'�|||
|
,.
|
M
§
§�1
k
�
a
(
§
-
!
7
m
ON
LL
§
!
�
§
k
;
k
•|!|!/|||�|���•'�|||
|
,.
M
§
§�1
�
�
a
(
-
7
m
ON
LL
•|!|!/|||�|���•'�|||
|
,.
7
m
ON
LL
I•
u
•
•
�0
I•
10
PARSONS -
subcontract, with the Authority's maximum cost being limited to Parsons
guaranteed figure. We believe that only an organization that combines all
project -related skills within its corporate structure can meaningfully make
such a guarantee.
Parsons will assume responsibility for its internally initiated change orders
resulting from process design changes. During the fast-track performance
period, we will administer construction disbursements, provide as -built
drawings, and furnish a complete 0&M manual. We anticipate completion of the
performance specifications in 180 days and have allowed 18 months for
construction/ procurement services. Startup and operations will be performed
in the manner described in Subsection 3.2 above, with Parsons providing
contract operating services.
We believe that the fast-track approach can result in important benefits to
the Authority, if implemented in a well planned and executed manner:
o The facility can be placed in service within 25 months of Notice to
Proceed and acceptance of a final process recommendation, as compared
with 32 months under our conventional model, and 39 months as stated in
the RFP.
o The hard -money contract bidding will be carefully targeted, and savings
in cost can be used to reduce project debt.
o Debt placement, fiscal planning, and user charge policy by the Authority
(and its member agencies) can proceed quickly, given guaranteed maximum
capital and operating cost exposure.
o The Authority can defer its decision on the engineer/contractor approach
until it is satisfied with the preliminary engineering report.
3.4 PERMITTING AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS
Parsons will provide the Authority with assistance and support for acquisition
of a Permit to Construct and a Permit to Operate from the South Coast Air
Quality Management District (SCAQMD) for equipment that will produce air
pollutants. Parsons has a group of air quality specialists that are
experienced in the preparation of air permit applications with the SCAQMD for
numerous clients, ranging from simple combustion -type equipment to more
complicated process equipment (such as for refineries). These permit
application documentations have included estimation of emissions, prediction
of resulting ambient concentrations by atmospheric dispersion modeling, risk
assessments for toxic air contaminant emissions, and other SCAQMD evaluation
requirements. In one case, Parsons was able to obtain a variance from the
SCAQMD for a client in siting a source of a toxic air contaminant near a
sensitive receptor (major population center). Parsons is in constant
consultation with the SCAQMD to provide its local clients with the most up-to-
date information on relevant air quality regulatory policies and issues.
Parsons also provides source testing services to its clients for performance
and efficiency evaluation of processes and their associated control equipment
in support of Permit to Operate applications. Parsons also has full service
SYD/1682 3-10 080888
I•
I•
0
I•
1•
PARSONS—
laboratories in its Pasadena and Berkeley offices that are equipped with the
most modern analyzers. Parsons is familiar with all analytical procedures that
are required by regulatory agencies to support performance evaluations of air
pollution control equipment.
In addition to permitting assistance with the SCAQMD, Parsons is experienced
in permitting assistance with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and the
California Coastal Commission. Parsons has prepared a number of national
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit applications and coastal
permit applications for various clients. Parsons is currently in consultation
with the Coastal Commission on a number of projects which include the Leucadia
Pump Station project and the Point Loma disinfection pilot study. Parsons is
also assisting the Silver Strand Marina Association in its coastal permit
application to allow development of the Ballona Lagoon near Marina Del Rey (a
remnant of the Ballona Wetlands) into a private 450 -slip boat harborage.
Parsons is also currently working with the Regional Water Quality Control
Board (RWQCB) in San Diego on the Point Loma Wastewater Treatment Plant Ocean
Plan Compliance. Parsons just recently completed the Tijuana Outfall
oceanographic engineering study which was reviewed by the RWQCB. Parsons also
recently completed the preparation of a 301H Waiver Application for the City
of Escondido San Elijo Outfall and submitted to the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (Region 9 office in San Francisco) through the San Diego
RWQCB.
Parsons also provides services in the area of environmental impact analyses.
We have prepared Environmental Assessments (EAs), Environmental Impact Reports
(EIRs), and Environmental Impact Statements (EISs) for a variety of projects.
Some of these projects include EAs for the U.S. Air Force Titan II/Titan IV
space launch vehicle programs at Vandenberg Air Force Base, the EIR/EIS for
the Pacific Texas pipeline project (a 1500 -mile crude oil pipeline from San
Pedro, California, to Midland, Texas), the EIR for the Los Angeles Convention
Center expansion project, and the EIR/EIS for the Ballona Lagoon improvement
project. Parsons is currently preparing the EIR for the City of Los Angeles
domestic sewage sludge disposal project. Parsons is also currently involved in
conducting environmental assessments for the City of Los Angeles Metro Rail
Project and the U.S. Army's Chemical Stockpile Disposal Program.
We have a full complement of environmental specialists, scientists, and
engineers in our Environmental Services Operations Group to address the
various disciplines in conducting environmental impact analyses. These
specialists are highly familiar with regulatory policies such as the national
Environmental Policy Act and the California Environmental Quality Act which
provide the framework for an environmental impact analysis. In addition, they
are also familiar with policies that have specific applicability such as the
Threatened and Endangered Species Act, the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act,
the Rivers and Harbors Act, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and a host
of other policies including those that have been adopted in the California
legislature (Proposition 65, La Follette bill, Connelly Bill, Tanner Bill,
etc). Parsons is prepared to assist the Authority in preparing a focused EIR
for this project.
SYD/1682
3-11
0
I0
10,
I•
1•
PARSONS -
3.5 PROJECT FINANCING
The RFP advises that the engineer/ contractor shall not be responsible for
financing of the project. However, proposers are advised that if they can
assist in securing low-cost financing for the Authority, they should state how
such assistance would be provided. Parsons has extensive experience in
wastewater project financing and is prepared to assist the Authority and its
advisors in defining an appropriate financing structure, enhancing the project
credit, and reducing the cost of debt. In this subsection, we discuss our
assumptions regarding the financing, our understanding of the financing
structure, and our approach to furnishing financing assistance.
3.5.1 ASSUMPTIONS
Parsons approach to financing assistance is dependent upon several key
assumptions. These assumptions are subject to change, as conditions in the
financial market change. One important lesson Parsons has learned in the area
of project finance is the value of flexibility. Our key assumptions for the
Authority's financing include:
o The Authority will be the owner of the facilities, as well as the
borrower, and have title to the ground upon which the facilities are to
be constructed. The Authority has no history as a borrower.
o The Authority will have, in place, agreements with its member agencies
that provide for the payment of financing costs and debt service.
o The source of repayment will be limited to annually appropriated
enterprise fund revenues. In the case of the City, sewer enterprise
revenues may be supplemented with proceeds from the assignment of the
City's existing treatment capacity at SERRA to others. The District's
enterprise funds may be supplemented by proceeds from the sale or lease
of surplus real property. In both cases, agreements establishing these
supplemental revenue sources have not yet been executed. The City has
substantial cash reserves which may be applied to the project, reducing
the overall borrowing. The District will have revenue from the sale of
the facility site to the Authority which may be available to reduce the
overall borrowing.
o Each member agency will assume responsibility for its share of financing
costs and debt service. Specific cost sharing arrangements, including
the cost of future capacity, have not been formally resolved, although
there is tentative agreement that the City will be responsible for
approximately 60% of the plant capacity and the District will be
responsible for approximately 40%. There is a desire to avoid "joint and
several" responsibility for the financing costs and debt service.
o Property tax is not available, on a general obligation basis, to either
member agency.
o The Authority will be responsible for all transaction costs, including
underwriter discounts, legal fees, and documentation.
SYD/1682 3-12 080888
J
�0
I*
I•
I•
PARSONS -
o The debt will be placed in the open market, or on a negotiated private
placement basis, and the Authority will pay prevailing interest rates
consistent with the quality of its debt offering.
o Debt will be "governmental debt" within the meaning of the 1986 Tax
Reform Act, and the Authority will take such steps as necessary to avoid
characterization of the debt as "private activity bonds."
o Depending upon cost, terms, and conditions, the Authority will consider
credit enhancements that improve the quality of the project credit. Our
suggested financing assistance involves credit enhancement.
o The member agencies will covenant to maintain user fees and charges at
levels sufficient to pay operating costs, debt service, and maintain
debt coverage reserves required by the lender, and further covenant the
non -substitution of the facilities during the outstanding term of the
borrowing.
o Project debt will be junior to any outstanding debt by either member
agency, unless otherwise provided in existing indentures.
3.5.2 FINANCING STRUCTURE
Given the above assumptions, two general financing structures are readily
available to the Authority: (1) revenue bonds and (2) municipal lease
financing. For purposes of brevity, we will confine our remarks to a municipal
lease financing structure. Figure 3-5 illustrates the range of participants
(including credit support) and their potential relationships in the fast-track
option, using a Certificate of Participation municipal lease structure. We are
prepared to discuss a revenue bond structure, if desired.
The service recipient (owner and borrower) will be the Capistrano Valley
Wastewater Authority. The Authority will enter into a long-term facility lease
with a qualified lessor. The qualified lessor could be a commercial bank,
leasing company, or special-purpose entity created for the purposes of the
transaction. On the strength of the long-term facility lease, the qualified
lessor will borrow money to construct the facility and pay capitalized
interest/financing costs through the sale of Certificates of Participation to
investors with an appetite for tax-exempt interest income.
The qualified lessor will disburse construction proceeds to the
engineer/contractor (service provider), through a trustee, as construction is
completed. The engineer/contractor will design the facilities and provide the
construction services outlined in Subsections 3.2 and 3.3 above. The debt
structure can support either a conventional or fast-track engineer/contractor
approach.
Upon acceptance of the facility by the Authority, lease payments to the lessor
will commence and continue on a noninterruptible basis for the term of the
lease, subject to annual appropriations by the Authority and/or its member
agencies.
SYD/1682
3-13
V •
Y.,
s
Y
.
_ i •
i O
( L
•N
O J
• Y a
•
he
OYV
� •
L
L N Y
- i
Id
T
9
• V
Y O •
. L
•
i i V
•N
nl (N
• L C
•
�
,YV
•H O
V � L
i
y
3 A 4D
— LL d
41y
a L e
d
d d
S. N
F m
—
�e
s as
Go
Go
dAns
^aa
e
e
-.
-
d •„
^
V
c wa
d
a
.x
U �O of
I
x
A
F
Y.,
s
.
V , Y
O J
OYV
� •
L
L N Y
- i
9
• V
Y O •
. L
•
i i V
• L C
•
! 4
,YV
V � L
i
y
I
PARSONS -
Figure 3-5 indicates a role for a credit facility. The credit facility
• contemplated here would be a letter -of -credit bank with a long-term investment
grade rating. The function of the bank would be to make lease payments from a
direct -pay letter of credit according to the terms of the lease. The letter -
of -credit bank would have a reimbursement agreement with the Authority, or its
member agencies directly. The reimbursement agreement would provide for
routine payment of letter of credit draws, and special provisions for
• repayment if routine payment is not received in a timely manner. Given the
financing assumptions and the inherent issues of project credit, we believe
that Parsons involvement might facilitate securing a letter -of -credit bank.
3.5.3 FINANCING ASSISTANCE
Parsons, through its privatization projects and project finance activities,
• has ongoing relations with providers of credit support.
For wastewater facilities, we have ongoing relations with the Fuji Bank and
Marubeni -America Corporation that, we believe, may be beneficial to the
Authority and its customers. Both Parsons, the Bank, and Marubeni stand ready
to meet with the Authority, its staff, and advisors to discuss letter -of -
40 credit arrangements that can reduce the cost of debt.
There may be significant advantages to a short-term variable-rate letter -of -
credit arrangement (i.e., 5 to 7 years) to reduce the cost of debt during the
early years of the borrowing. We would want to discuss a variable rate
structure with the Authority and the possibility of establishing an upper
• limit on the Authority's exposure to variable rate fluctuations. In today's
market the long-term fixed rates are at historic lows. Whether this situation
will persist into the fall and after the presidential election, is unclear.
The Bank and Marubeni believe that certain general conditions will apply to a
letter -of -credit arrangement:
•
o Some periodic remarketing of the outstanding debt.
o A 5- to 7 -year agreement on letter of credit costs.
o A negotiable "evergreen" renewal covenant.
• o A Bank security interest in the facility.
K7
10
o Agreement by the Authority and its member agencies to use the facility
for the term of the lease, or a long-term enterprise revenue pledge.
o Agreement by the Authority, and its member agencies, to set rates and
charges sufficient to pay operating costs and debt service and maintain
required reserves.
o Negotiation of a mutually acceptable reimbursement agreement between the
Authority, its member agencies, and the credit provider.
o Appropriate compensation for the credit provider's risk.
SYD/1682
3-15
PARSONS-
During the preparation of the preliminary engineering report, Parsons, the
Bank, and Marubeni would work with the Authority's staff, financial advisors,
and bond counsel to develop a credit enhancement tool to support our suggested
fast-track or conventional options.
•
u
•
•
SYD/1682
•
3-16
�0
0
I•
I•
1•
1•
1•
PARSONS -
SECTION 4
DESIGN CONCEPT
The primary object of the proposed project is to provide a wastewater
treatment facility to the Authority that meets its needs in the most cost-
effective manner possible. There are certain self-imposed, as well as
regulatory, criteria and constraints associated with the project. The
environmental criteria are delineated in Appendix B, Selection Criteria, and
were developed from the RFP as well as numerous discussions with concerned
members of the Authority.
Prior to developing design criteria and process options, a wastewater
characterization was developed based on best available information. This
characterization is depicted in Appendix C, Wastewater Characterization, and
will be used with all option evaluations in order to assure a uniform basis
for subsequent screening and selection of the optimum cost-effective system.
"Cost effective" means life cycle cost tempered by best engineering judgment.
The two basic biological systems for wastewater treatment which were evaluated
involved either a fixed -film or suspended -growth system. Two suspended -growth
and two fixed -film systems were selected for initial consideration. For the
fixed -film processes, biotowers and submerged biological contactors were
selected. For suspended -growth systems, conventional activated sludge and
sequential batch reactors were selected. There are numerous other variations
of both systems which could be incorporated into the final design. Most of
the variations would have little impact on the capital costs. The process
descriptions are provided in detail in Appendix D, Alternative Process
Descriptions.
In order to ensure that the candidate processes would meet the discharge
criteria and all unit processes are properly sized, each system was evaluated
by a computer model developed by Parsons. In addition, flow schematics were
developed and a mass balance performed around each system to ensure accuracy
and better define waste streams and residual solids production. These
documents are presented in Appendix E, Computer Models and Mass Balance
Diagrams.
Common to all alternatives is the Victoria influent pump station and the
effluent transport system after disinfection to the SERRA outfall structure.
Because of the commonality of these systems, they are described separately in
the appendices.
In order to ensure uniformity in cost estimating for the candidate processes,
the CAPDET program was used in developing costs. These data are presented in
Appendix F, Cost Estimate Summaries. CAPUT is a standardized EPA -approved
model for developing planning level capital cost estimates for alternative
treatment processes.
SYD/1682 4-1 080888
0
�0
0
�0
10
10
I*,
1•
16
PARSONS -
The most promising system based on CAPDET appears to be the sequential batch
reactor system. The CAPDET analysis is not sensitive to complex power rate
structures or manpower requirements with respect to operator skill and local
conditions. In order to address these areas of specific sensitivities, a
simple life cycle cost analysis was performed on each candidate process.
Electrical costs were examined in as much detail as possible because the rate
structure incorporates peak demand, offpeak demand, power factor, and diurnal
as well as seasonal charges. A cursory power cost analysis is included in the
CAPDET for the Authority's review and consideration. The rate structure as
proposed by San Diego Gas and Electric is also included. The life cycle cost
analysis is based on a 20 -year operation at a flow of 6.3 mgd. This data is
included in Appendix G, Life Cycle Costs.
Based on Parson's CAPDET analysis, the evaluated systems are ranked with
respect to capital cost as follows:
(1) Sequential batch reactors
(2) Submerged biological contactors
k.5) diotowers
(4) Conventional activated sludge
Based on at simple life cycle cost using 1988 dollars the candidate systems
rank as follows: (This information is summarized in Figure 4-1.)
(1) Submerged biological contactors
(2) Biotowers
(3) Conventional activated sludge
(4) Sequential batch reactors
All of the above systems include anaerobic digestion except the sequential
batch reactor process. Anerobic digestion was selected as the least -cost
approach with regard to life cycle costs along with the fact that there is a
potential for energy recovery. Aerobic digestion was also considered but not
utilized in the proposed system due to high operating costs. The approximate
annual operating cost to aerobically digest sludge from the three processes
that have anaerobic digestion is $140,000 per year. During the preliminary
design phase, a decision as to the value of aerobic digestion will be made in
conjunction with the Authority. It is recognized that sludge treatment and
handling may be accomplished at the SERRA treatment facility. However, the
cost of sludge treatment facilities would remain basically the same except for
the sludge transport system. Ultimate sludge disposal for all systems at this
stage incorporates hauling to a landfill. Future consideration would be given
to a regional composting facility for discharges in the geographical area.
Considering the process alternatives and their costs, it is necessary to
confer with the Authority as to specific sensitivities with regard to
environmental considerations and cost weighting. As an example the biotower
has a high physical profile. The sequential batch reactors have the least odor
potential and the lowest land consumption. The submerged biological contactors
also use a minimum amount of land and have lower operating cost but are less
conducive to water reclamation than either of the suspended growth systems.
SYD/1682 4-2 080888
0
r�
U
0
0
:�
•
0
I0
I*
4-3
A
♦j d N
N
N
ro O
m T
m
O
ro"
v d m
m
m
m
7N
c
el
10
N
1
c
m
M
Q
N
Go
w
..
a ro
o{.
Fc
of
at
W O
1•
a 1N
C N
ro ro
6 d
M +) ^
O —
d^
m
m
m
m
ro
c a—
0 m
O v
cc'0a•..<v.l
7
N
m
V1
lT
fr N
to
N
a
IT
� 7
N
0
.i
C
N w
C N
ro d
d ro
O l.0
c If
m
el
N
N
O D
el
el
el
el
U
tlF
YF
N
N
W4
c d
�o
n
m
m
O w
E
d ro40
c 40
ro '°
N
N 01 A
Go
ad
O F
N
C
to
ro•..
o c
as ro c
Z
V
V
V
A
N
O
�
4
fuc
O
" d
N
�(.
'O
OO
N
N
a
'O
C
O
O
O
N c
O
N
O N
M ro
E O
M
c
go
c go
7U
0
�++
aQ
0
m
°
O °
a
00¢
d
N
4-3
A
♦j d N
N
N
ro O
m T
m
O
el +3
v d m
bi
el A
O
h Y
w
O T
Go
w
..
a ro
o{.
Fc
of
at
W O
1•
a 1N
C N
ro ro
6 d
M +) ^
O —
U N
'O N YI
N
O
3 O
ro
c a—
0 m
O m
cc'0a•..<v.l
o••
d
;
s.
N a
•o
O •�
to C
T a
W 7
A •�
..
N a
C N
ro d
d ro
O l.0
Ai•��
a A 0
N N
ro M
M ro 0
M b
N
ro •+
c
v
F •+
'O ro
ia O
N C •.�
d {�
O w
E
d ro40
c 40
Z
N
N 01 A
Go
O
O F
N
C
ro•..
o c
as ro c
V
V
V
PARSONS -
After selection by the Authority, Parsons will review in detail with the
• Authority the above options as well as modifications of these options. Factors
such as land utilization, future effluent use, profile, odor potential, and
other environmental and cost factors will temper the final decision.
Modifications of the suspended growth process such as the AO and Schrieber
process can reduce nitrogen levels in the effluent biologically, which is an
advantage for reclamation and stream discharge, although not required (and
• expensive) for the existing ocean outfall discharge permit.
The current ocean disposal requirements for SERRA do not require a high level
of treatment. This may be a key factor in selection of the best system for the
Authority. Further, as a general rule, treatment systems producing a high-
quality effluent require higher skill levels and more manpower than a basic
state-of-the-art system.
•
It is significant to note that all of the treatment processes discussed in
this proposal are capable of meeting the discharge requirements in a reliable
manner. After selection, Parsons will expand the screening process to assure
that the best process has been selected to meet the Authority's needs now and
in the future.
r.
u
:i
n
J
•
SYD/1682 4-4 080888
•
J
I•
1•
C
SECTION 5
CONTRACTUAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
5.1 SUMMARY
PARSONS -
Parsons has extensive experience in tailoring contractual relations and can
offer the Authority with a high degree of flexibility in structuring a clear,
straightforward, and efficient contract document to will govern our
performance. Our goal is to provide the project principals (including the
Authority's General Manager) with a management tool that supports the
Authority's goals of timely performance, cost control, state-of-the-art
professional services, and an appropriate level of Authority involvement. We
!hree general contractual areas:
o Conventional Engineering Services Master Agreement
o Fast -Track Engineering/Construction Services
o Facilities Operations
5.2 CONVENTIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
The Authority can hire Parsons, as independent contractor, to furnish
conventional engineering services The contract can be a Master Agreement with
provisions for specific tasks. Engineering services will include preliminary
engineering evaluations and design; preliminary engineering report; detailed
plans, specifications, and construction contract documents; a draft ODM
manual; prequalification and analysis of construction bids; and additional
design work as directed. Construction work will include resident engineering
services; administration of construction contracts; contractor inspection;
review of shop and erection drawings; O&M manuals; startup assistance; record
drawings; and additional construction services as directed. Parsons will use
subcontracts for specialized design and/or construction services as needed,
including survey; soils and geotechnical investigation; printing of
construction plans and specifications; wastewater sampling and evaluation;
value engineering; assistance in developing revenue programs and financing
plans; assistance in public hearings, as required; or other specialized
services.
The master contract will provide for performance periods for specific tasks.
Force majeure events will include events beyond our reasonable control.
Payment provisions will not be affected by suspension due to force majeure.
Consequential damages will be mutually waived. The Authority will have the
right to terminate for convenience at any point in the performance of our
services, subject to compensation for work already performed, or subcontracts
then outstanding and/or cancellation charges. The Authority's termination
rights will apply to specific task assignments. Agency liability can be
limited to the Authority unless otherwise provided for in the financing
documents. Parsons will negotiate payment provisions on a progress basis.
SYD/1682
5-1
PARSONS—
Parsons will not assign work to a party not affiliated with the Corporation
without the written consent of the Authority. Project documents and work
• products are instruments of service in respect to the project, and can be used
only for the purposes specified.
Construction prices, process materials, and other items of construction are
estimates, based on our professional judgment. Bids or construction costs may
vary from our professional opinions. Parsons will use reasonable care to
•, provide against construction contractor defects and deficiencies. Parsons will
reperform its design services at no cost to the Authority if its design
products are determined to be deficient in meeting the facilities' performance
standards. A specimen Master Engineering Agreement is contained in Appendix H.
5.3 FAST-TRACK ENGINEERING/CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
• If, upon completion of the preliminary engineering report, the Authority
desires to implement the fast-track engineer/contractor approach, we would
then amend the Master Agreement including:
(1) A guaranteed maximum price for design and construction.
(2) A guaranteed in-service date for the facilities.
• (3) Reasonable liquidated damages provisions.
(4) Definition of fast track bid packages and procurement procedures.
(5) Consolidation and enforcement of vendor warranties.
(6) Obtain utilities and related services at the site.
(7) Authority -directed design/construction changes and procedures.
(8) Parsons responsibility for testing/commissioning the facilities.
• (9) Up to 18 months' warranty on defects in equipment, materials, or
workmanship, subject to proper operation and maintenance by the
facility operators, if other than Parsons.
(10) A one-year warranty against any tier contractor or subcontractor
defects in material and workmanship for all field construction work.
(11) Payment provisions for disbursement of construction fund proceeds.
• (12) An incentive -based CM fee tied to cost and schedule savings.
5.4 OPERATIONS
As operator, the engineer/contractor will accept the consequences of its
design and/or construction efforts. Parsons welcomes this opportunity. We have
• extensive experience in operating facilities we have designed and constructed.
We involve our operations unit in all phases of design and construction.
I•
I•
The operations contract can be structured on an annually renewable basis, or a
fixed 5 -year basis, with termination provisions. Compensation can be lump sum,
cost plus fixed fee, or time and expense. Parsons offers a blanket process
design warranty that the facilities, as designed by Parsons, will provide
acceptable effluent, subject to the influent wastewater characterization, for
as long as Parsons operates the facilities. Appendix H contains a specimen
operations and maintenance contract. The highlights of this agreement are
summarized below.
The scope of services includes startup, equipment testing, warranty
enforcement, full-service operations, sludge disposal, comprehensive
sYD/1682 5-2 080688
PARSONS—
maintenance, laboratory services, budget administration, ongoing technical
support, recommendations on future modifications (i.e., upgrade to reclamation
standards), and ongoing staff training. The Authority will retain beneficial
ownership of effluent and residual solids.
Staffing will be in accordance with a mutually agreeable manpower plan. The
Authority can approve key operations personnel. The operation manager will be
a registered sanitary engineer.
Parsons will be responsible for odor control and provide a mechanism for the
assessment and resolution of any odor concerns.
We will be relieved of our performance requirements in the event of a shutdown
that is beyond the reasonable control of our operations staff. In such
circumstances, we will make best efforts to produce acceptable effluent. We
will be governed by generally accepted practices and procedures for the proper
operation of wastewater facilities. Priority will be given to the maintenance
of the facilities as a "showcase" for efficient, cost effective, and
environmentally sensitive operations.
Our operations staff will maintain vendor warranties. The Authority will have
full and unrestricted access to the facilities to inspect the condition of the
facility. We will provide periodic performance reports to the Authority.
Parsons will submit budget to the Authority at least 90 days prior to the
commencement of each fiscal year, providing cost projections for the coming
3 -year period. We will provide a budget for routine repair and replacement,
and will negotiate a price per event ceiling on routine repairs and
replacements. Events with costs above the ceiling will be funded through a
separate Authority -funded repair and replacement reserve.
We believe the lowest costs to the Authority can be obtained by pricing the
O&M services for an initial period, on a time -and -expense basis with a
guaranteed maximum cost. During this period, our books will be open for
Authority inspection. Thereafter, the operating fee can be annually
renegotiated on a lump -sum basis. We suggest that power costs be a direct
pass-through without markup.
We also suggest cross -indemnification for negligent acts. Insurance provisions
reflect industry standards. The agreement will contain provisions for
termination.
Ll
SYD/1682 5-3 080688
U
SECTION 6
PROJECT COST AND SCHEDULE
6.1 SUMMARY
PARSONS -
In Section 5, Parsons outlined its general approach to establish compensation
for professional services. We are prepared to negotiate compensation
arrangement tied to specific task assignments on a fixed -fee, cost -plus -fee,
or a time -and -expense basis, with costs depending upon process selection and
engineer/contractor approach.
6.2 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
The estimated cost for the preparation of a conventional Basis of Design
Report as outlined in Subsection 3.2 is $69,000. These efforts will involve an
estimated 1,450 manhours. Costs for additional survey and geotechnical
investigations will depend upon the level of work accomplished by the
Authority's independent contractors and the extent that such work can be used
by Parsons.
If the Authority desires the Basis of Design Report to include a guaranteed
i• maximum price and guaranteed schedule, an additional fee of $18,000 is
suggested. This work will entail an additional 400 manhours. The additional
manhours will occur on the same time schedule as the conventional approach and
will be accomplished in the same time frame.
Survey costs are estimated at $10,000, and soils investigation costs 'are
�• estimated at $20,000. Both estimates are subject to available information from
j the Authority.
6.3 DESIGN ENGINEERING
Under the conventional engineer/contractor approach, we estimate that the
• facilities will require from 120 to 160 drawings, including specification and
bidding documents, depending upon the design process. The estimated cost would
range from $420,000 to $560,000, depending upon the design process. This
figure may be adjusted depending upon the process recommendations contained in
Ithe Basis of Design Report.
• Our estimated cost for services during bidding is $40,000 and includes a
prebid conference, issuing answers to bidders' questions, preparation and
issuing of bid addendum (two mayor addendums are assumed), receiving and
reviewing bids, recommendation for awards, and interpreting plans and
specifications during the bidding process. Professional services related to
1 permitting are estimated at $25,000.
•
SYD/1682 6-1 080888
17
PARSONS -
6.4 CONSTRUCTION COORDINATION
Construction coordination will include a resident engineer, inspector,
secretary/clerk, and home office engineering services, including shop drawings
submittal review, responses to inquiries, clarification sketches and change
order drawings, periodic site visits, and record drawings. Based on a 20 -month
construction period our estimate for these services ranges from $400,000 to
$500,000, depending on the process selected.
6.5 CONSTRUCTION COST
Figure 6-1 (Summary of Estimated Capital and Operating Costs) indicates a
range of $10.325 million to $13.447 million in capital costs, depending on the
• process system ultimately selected by the Authority. These costs are exclusive
of indirect costs (i.e. design, construction arrangement, contingencies, etc.)
and financing -related costs. Figures are in 1988 dollars.
6.6 OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE COSTS
• Figure 6-1 also indicates an annual operating and maintenance cost. These
costs range from $336,000/year to =1,012,000/year, depending upon the process
system ultimately selected by the Authority. These estimates are based upon
6.3 mgd flow, and include operation and maintenance labor, power costs,
material costs, and chemical costs only. Figures are in 1988 dollars.
6.7 FAST TRACK
•
Depending upon the extent of fast track authorized at the conclusion of
preliminary engineering, the combined cost for design and construction
services might be reduced by $100,000 to $150,000.
As part of a fast-track procurement, Parsons would suggest an independent
• incentive fee arrangement whereby Parsons would participate in the savings
below the guaranteed maximum price, coupled with a bonus provision for early
completion. Another approach might involve allocating Parsons a somewhat
higher percentage of savings negotiated below bid prices received for the
speciality contracts, with an early completion bonus.
• 6.8 PROJECT FINANCE
If Parsons arranges credit enhancement along the lines outlined in Subsection
3.5, we would suggest a fee tied to a percentage of the net present value of
the resulting savings to the Authority. For example, if Parsons -arranged
credit enhancement resulted in a net present value savings of $1.4 million,
• when compared with an unrated (or BAA -rated) COP issue, our compensation might
be a percentage of the projected savings in debt service costs. We would
anticipate further discussion of financing -related compensation during the
development of the preliminary design.
u
SYD/1682 6-2 080888
•
6-3
M d N
+ M
C
N
3..
7^
'OM
M
h M
C N
7
m T
h m
O
7
N
a
w
00%
C .�
O
•i
+ 4
43..
C
m
N
Q
N
45
o
h d
W
0 a
0
w
.+
a A
O h
F c
M
d
W O
r+h
aN
d^
m
m
m
m
N
m
m
m
m
O .r
Ca..0m
�a
0z
7
N
m
M
N
V a
.. drl
O+
d
3..
N 7
N
04
.1
of C
N w
N a
C A
m
rl
N
N
A h
7 E
O N
.+ +�
v
N
Y!
M
M
a
V
4 �
e
d
E
C d
t0
h
m
A9
V t0
N O
N c +�
d h
ad
d 10 E
d
h N
N 04
z
C p
C 9
F'
0
N
O C
46 O C
a c
V A
h
^
^
N
A
w h
b
d 0
N
h
c b c
O
N C
O
to A
4
O�
d,a
A++
;4 43
3^�
cm
O"
A
EO
f1
aQ
spa
3"
°
�«
7
to
o
O 0
a
d
�
�a
N
6-3
M d N
+ M
C
N
3..
7^
'OM
M
h M
C N
7
m T
h m
O
ei .+
d m
a
w
00%
C .�
O
•i
+ 4
43..
a..
++..
o
E
R h
.i A
o
h d
W
0 a
d 43
w
.+
a A
O h
F c
O E
d
W O
r+h
aN
CN
A A
a d
w M^
u N
7 N k
N
O
7 O
A
Ca..0m
�a
0z
in
cha%
C C
V a
.. drl
O+
d
3..
h
N a
O
7 ++
of C
T of
N a
N
C • N
fs0
dR
0h#)
A h
7 E
O N
.+ +�
d A O
N N
A N
L A 0
++ a
N
4 �
e
d
E
V t0
N O
N c +�
d h
0 W
d 10 E
Z h
h N
N 04
C p
C 9
E: ' V
4+
O C
46 O C
a c
V A
O E A
^
^
^
V
V
V
a
t0
PARSONS -
6.9 SCHEDULE
Figures 6-2 and 6-3 indicate our estimated time for either the conventional
approval or the fast-track approach. We estimate that the conventional
I approach can be completed within 32 months of Notice to Proceed, or 7 months
faster than the schedule outlined in the RFP. We estimate that the fast-track
approach can be completed in 25 months, subject to conditions within our
responsible control, or 14 months faster than the schedule outlined in the
RFP.
•
0
.]
•
SYD/1682
0
6-4
i
I*
11
T T
43 41
O d
c c F
Q t
F c c
Go OPr
3 d
d A �
°
IO F
i0 G c
N EC>
6-5
^^
ad
iA
F d
le a
ro
N v
V
.
I
F
4
p
7
F
^
N
N d
C
.
O ►�
O
d A
V
N �
d
A
M
N ^ {L
rl
N
c a
IecN
a
C
O
^ w M v
N^ 10 (O
c3C..
A d M
a+
a iV
Nva
d
a
cm"
I
is
a
a
a^X
e3m
W &0
M
v
•
�a
al
c
O
N
d
0
c
c
=
M
7 0
M
W
W4a
O
M
F
40
M
F
F4
a
h
q
°
c
w a
0
6-5
n
n
a �
H ^
N A�
7O
o:LLE
i. 41 +�
•
C
AE£
w
w
w
w
N U
i0 F" O
p"'
d
i
„ U
� d A
� N F
o A
•
A N
N U'
1L L
NE
{.
a�
A�
v
n
n
w
n
n
n
w
w
w
w
w
ao
7"
w
�
N
w
{.
A
w
v
w
w
N
V
w
^
N
Iw
w
U
d
a
N
w
�
�
N ^
C N
AN
�
a
�
c
a
r.
C
N
U
a
w
v
a
a
'
c3
W d
'
da
a
w
y
a v
V I
N
o
c
C
°
c
a
op
W
15 N
V
U
A.
Q
a
dA
i.
c
N°
as
a
r$
o
PARSONS -
•
APPENDIX A
PARSONS QUALIFICATIONS
Detailed descriptions of 4 Parsons Municipal Services, Inc., ongoing
wastewater projects are provided herein.
:-i
•
I
10
LJ
•
I
1
0
SYD/1682 A_1
0
CASE HISTORY FORM
Client Name: City of Chandler, Arizona
Contract Type: Service Agreement
Period of Performance: From: Dec. 1983 To: Dec. 2008
Place of Performance: Chandler, Arizona
Maximum Personnel Assigned: Construction 200; Operations
Title of Contract Report Wastewater Service Agreement
Purpose and Results of Contract:
The City is a rapidly growing community in the Phoenix Metropolitan area.
Because of growth, the City required a new 5 mgd wastewater treatment plant,
expandable in increments to 20 mgd. Effluent would be used for recreational
purposes, thereby dictating advanced secondary treatment. At the time, the
City lacked bond capacity to issue its own debt. Further, the City had
experience with contracting out for public services, and was aware of
substantial Federal tax benefits then available for privately -owned wastewater
treatment plants. Parsons was selected through a privatization procurement to
own, finance, build, and operate the facility for a 25 year term. The
facility was placed in service ahead of schedule, with construction savings in
excess of $3 million. The Mayor has publicly stated that the privatization
arrangement with Parsons is saving the citizens of Chandler in excess of $1
million per year.
Description of Contract Services
Parsons reviewed and accepted a third party design and provided a 25 year
process warranty the that plant, as design and constructed, would meet its
discharge permit conditions. Parsons financed the project through the
issuance of Industrial Development Bonds. Parsons offered the City a capital
charge, or Base Service Fee that was approximately 200 basis points below the
then current amortization rate for equivalent municipal debt. Parsons then
bid the construction of the facility and provided full construction management
services. Upon completion, Parsons performed start-up, and has been
continuously operating the facility since November, 1985.
�0 Cost and Price Information:
Service Fee: $1,987,889; approximately
$700,000
for O&M
Total Completed Cost: $19,943,424
(Design/Construct)
Design/construct
no
(yes or
no)
Finance
yes
(yes or
no)
Operate
yes
(yes or
no)
Community Relations Assistance
yes
(yes or
no)
Appearance at Formal Hearings
yes
(yes or
no)
Coordination with local X
county X
city
X state
and/or federal agencies.
PMS/1501
Chandler
1•
A-2
121587
References
B. Metzler, Public Works Director
City of Chandler
200 East Commonwealth Avenue
Chandler, Arizona 85224
(602) 899-9772
I•
PMS/1501
Chandler
I•
A-3
121587
.]
11
u
P'�
Client Name:
Contract Type:
Period of Performance:
Place of Performance:
Maximum Personnel Assigned:
Title of Contract Report:
CASE HISTORY FORM
City of Gilbert, Arizona
Service Agreement
From: DEC. 1984 To: 2009
Gilbert, Arizona
Construction 120; 0&M 4
Wastewater Service Agreement
Purpose and Results of Contract:
The City of Gilbert is a rapidly growing community within the Phoenix
metropolitan area. Over time, large developers had assembled significant
parcels for residential and commercial development. However, due to overload
on its existing primary wastewater plant, the City was under a moritorium on
new wastewater services until an upgraded and expanded wastewater facility was
placed in service. Gilbert lacked the assessed valuation to support general
obligation bonds and lacked the wastewater system revenue to support a revenue
bond. Gilbert became aware of the City of Chandler's privatization
experience, and requested privatization bids for the upgrade and expansion of
its wastewater facility. Parsons won the competition and successfully
negotiated a 25 year turnkey wastewater service agreement with the City. The
service agreement is subject to annual appropriations; is secured by
collateralize pledges from the City's major land developers; provides for 25
year process warranties; provides advanced secondary treatment for
recreational re -use; designed by Engineering Science (Parsons who ly-owned
environmental engineering subsidiary); construction by Ralph M. Parsons
Company; operations by Parsons Municipal Services, Inc.; and the establishment
of a plant expansion fund, into which the City's share of tax benefits will be
deposited. The plant was placed in service 11 months ahead of schedule.
Description of Contract Services
Parsons designed and constructed the facility on a lumpsum design/construct
basis and provided a 25 year process performance warranty. Parsons arranged a
complex financing for the project involving non-recourse to the City with
secured pledges from major developers to purchase capacity in the plant over a
ten year period. The debt was financed through the issuance of Industrial
Development Bonds secured by an AA rated letter of credit. The bonds carry a
variable interest rate. The capital charge to the City is fixed. The plant
is now in-service and will be operated by Parsons over the next 25 years. The
Gilbert facility produces effluent to identical standards with Chandler, has
10 percent more capacity, was finished in 60 percent of the time, and produced
a construction cost savings of 25 percent when compared with Chandler.
Parsons attributes this savings principally to fast track design/construct
techniques employed at Gilbert.
Cost and Price Information:
Service Fee: Capital
Total Completed Cost:
(Design/Construct)
PMS/1501
Gilbert
$1,600,000 O&M $400,000
$14,898,000
A-4
121587
Did Contract Include:
Design/construct yes (yes or no)
Finance yes
Operate yes
Community Relations Assistance yes
Appearance at Formal Hearings yes
Coordination with local X county X city X state X ,
and/or federal agencies.
References
Kent Cooper, City Manager
City of Gilbert, Arizona
119 North Gilbert Rd.
Gilbert, Arizona 85235
(602) 892-0802
PMS/1501 A-5 121587
Gilbert
F
[7
CASE HISTORY FORM
Client Name: Pelham, Alabama
Contract Type: Service Agreement
Period of Performance: From: DEC. 1985 To: DEC. 2010
Place of Performance: Pelham, Alabama
Maximum Personnel Assigned: Construction 120; 0&M 6
Title of Contract Report Wastewater Service Agreement
Purpose and Results of Contract:
The City of Pelham is a small, but rapidly growing, community in the
Birmingham metropolitan area. Until recently, the City had no central
wastewater collection and treatment facilities, and relied on septic systems
and small, poorly operated, package treatment facilities. The City concluded
that the lack of a municipal system was depressing growth and property
values. The City was, however, to small to finance the system on its own
credit, and choose to take advantage of recently enacted legislation enabling
Alabama cities to enter into long-term wastewater service contracts. Parsons
was selected through a competitive bidding process to develop a municipal
wastewater collection and treatment system under Parsons' ownership, including
financing, design, construction, and operations. This system included over 40
miles of collection sewers and an advanced secondary wastewater treatment
plant. The project was completed on schedule and within budget and is now in
operations. The project was financed with Industrial Development Bonds
supported by a FGIC credit insurance policy.
Description of Contract Services
Financing of the $16 m project with credit enhanced IDBS; fast track design
and construction; start-up; and operations, subject to a 25 year process
warranty, fixed annual capital charges, and annually negotiated operations
contract.
Cost And Price Information:
Service Fee: for 1988 - $1,433,019 (0&M included; estimated at $400,000)
Total Completed Cost
(Design/Construct)
Did Contract Include:
Design/construct
yes
(yes
or no)
Finance
yes
(yes
or no)
Operate
yes
(yes
or no)
Community Relations Assistance
yes
(yes
or no)
Appearance at Formal Hearings
yes
(yes
or no)
Coordination with local X
county
X
city X state
and/or federal agencies.
PMS/1501
Pelham
A-6
121587
Client Name:
Contract Type:
Period of Performance:
Place of Performance:
Maximum Personnel Assigned:
Title of Contract Report
CASE HISTORY FORM
Regional Water Pollution Control
Downingtown, Pennsylvania
Wastewater Service Agreement
From: DEC. 1985 To: DEC.
Downingtown, Pennsylvania
Construction 80 0&M 11
Wastewater Service Agreement
Purpose and Results of Contract:
Center,
2010
The Bourough of Downingtown selected Parsons to upgrade and expand its
existing 4 mgd wastewater treatment plant. The facility, which also serves
four smaller adjacent Pennsylvania communities has been expanded, through a 25
year privatization agreement, to treat a total of 7 mgd at more stringent
advanced secondary treatment discharge standards. The project involved
several inter -governmental agreements between the five communities, as well as
a service agreement between DRWPCC and Parsons. Parsons designed and
constructed the facilities and financed the $16.4 m improvements with proceeds
from the sale of Industrial Development Bonds. DRWPCC continues to own the
original plant, which is leased to Parsons, and Parsons owns the expansion
elements. The US EPA has maintained a keen interest in this privatization
project, since the original facilities were funded in part by an EPA grant.
Parsons retained all original public employees, at equivalent wage and
benefits.
Description of Contract Services
Parsons negotiated a 25 year service contract, financed, designed, is
constructing and will commence operation of the expanded Downingtown
facilities in January. Parsons undertook operation of the existing plant
prior to start of construction, and operated the facility during
construction. The service agreement provided for a fixed capital charge,
reflecting tax benefits; 25 year process performance guarantees, and options
for future plant expansion.
Cost And Price Information:
Base Service Fee: $777,150 (annual) $1,400,000 for O&M
Total Completed Cost: 57,535,000
(Design/Construct)
Did Contract Include:
Design/construct
yes
(yes
or no)
Finance
yes
(yes
or no)
Operate
yes
(yes
or no)
Community Relations Assistance
yes
(yes
or no)
Appearance at Formal Hearings
yes
(yes
or no)
Coordination with local X
county
X
city X state
and/or federal agencies.
PMS/1501
Downing
10
A-8
121587
References
Don Greenleaf, Borough Manager
Borough of Downingtown
Borough Hall
4 West Lancaster Avenue
Downingtown, Pennsylvania 19335
(215) 268-0344
•
Ip
•
PMS/1501
Downing
I0
A-9
121587
•
H
APPENDIX B
SELECTION CRITERIA
PARSONS -
I
The Authority's wastewater treatment plant location is in an environmentally
i sensitive location with nearby commercial, residential, and recreational
activities. The site is flat and visible. Available land is clearly defined.
Therefore, the following elements were considered during the preliminary
screening process by Parsons:
o Noise levels should be equal to or less than existing background levels.
o Odor control should be provided for any unit process that may be a
potential source.
o The design should minimize deep cuts because of the potable water table.
o The new facility should provide adequate redundancy and flexibility to
ensure production of quality water on a continuous basis.
o The design and facility layout should take into consideration increased
effluent quality requirements as well as the possibility of future
expansion.
o The maximum elevation of any structure should not exceed the height of
adjacent existing structure such as the Price Club building, and the
design should reflect architectural standards consistent with a "light
industrial" land use.
o The design and operation must be cost effective and simple to operate.
SYD/1682 B-1 o8o688
7
PROCESS SELECTION
PARSONS -
The Request For Proposal indicates that the main treatment scheme should be a
biological system using state-of-the-art technology. Parsons agrees with this
approach rather than physical processes which are low in capital cost but
inordinately high in operation and maintenance costs.
i
The two basic biological processes are suspended -growth and fixed -film reactor
systems. There are many variations within these two basic groups. Two common
systems were selected from each group.
9
SUSPENDED GROWTH SYSTEMS
. For the suspended -growth system, conventional activated sludge and sequential
batch reactors were selected. The cost of a conventional system would be about
equal to other systems. As an example the AO process and the Schrieber process
both use an anoxic phase as does the submerged biological reactors (SBR).
Because the SBR system does not use final clarifiers, the capital cost is
less. For these reasons the SBR was used as one suspended -growth alternative.
A conventional activated sludge system is the most comprehensive type of
treatment, and therefore utilizes more unit processes and accordingly will
have the highest capital cost and land requirements. Other variations such as
contact stabilization and step aeration will be equal to or slightly less than
the cost for conventional activated sludge.
Considering the above comments, the two selected suspended -growth systems
represent the high and low capital costs with about the same reliability.
During the preliminary design, other variations can be examined as to capital
and O&M costs.
i
SYD/1682 B-2 080688
[7
0
7
•
hl
I1
•
1•
PARSONS -
FIXED FILM SYSTEMS
The two basic fixed -film systems are trickling filters and rotating biological
contactors. A trickling filter system using plastic media (biotower) was
selected for evaluation rather than a conventional rock media system. The
reason for the plastic media is simply that it requires less space and is
traditionally lower in construction costs. Rock and plastic media produce the
same results given the same effective surface area. Biotowers are deeper, have
a higher elevation, and therefore a higher visual profile. The biotower system
was conceived to have a height of less than the nearest major building, the
Price Club.
Submerged biological contactors were selected for the second fixed -film
alternative. This system functions the same as rotating biological contactors,
except that the contactors are 80% submerged. The advantages of the submerged
approach are manifold. It reduces the weight on the shaft and bearings,
provides a better medium for oxygen transfer, prevents loading problems, and
provides a mechanism that better controls the effective film depth and
therefore can assimilate and treat higher organic loadings than conventional
rotating biological contactor units.
In addition, it is our understanding that the Capistrano Beach Sanitary
District will be installing a pilot SBC system in the near future to augment
its current treatment capacity. Should the preliminary engineering study
demonstrate that the SBC system is the most attractive process, then the
operation staff will have experience with process.
SLUDGE DIGESTION AND HANDLING
Anaerobic digestion was selected for three of the processes. An aerated
holding tank was provided for the submerged biological contactor system. Since
the mean cell residence of this system approaches extended aeration, sludge
digestion is essentially accomplished during the process, with appropriate
increases in power consumption.
SYD/1682 B-3 080688
PARSONS -
Aerobic digestion was also considered. The approximate energy costs were
$130,000 for the conventional activated sludge process and $160,000 for the
fixed -film systems. To demonstrate the most cost-effective approach where
possible, aerobic digestion was not included in the estimates.
•, All systems would require a belt press for dewatering and also subsequent
hauling to a landfill.
7
•
SYD/1682
•
IM
6o
I!
I0
I*
10
PARSONS -
APPENDIX C
WASTEWATER CHARACTERIZATION
The following table contains the wastewater characterization that is used for
the proposed design alternative screenings. There is little data available at
the present time; therefore, the characterization is based on assumption and
the data currently available.
Upon selection, Parsons will collect samples and other data to verify our
assumptions. This activity is key in that it will dictate unit process sizes
as well as capital and 0&M costs.
As an example, all clarifiers have been designated based on a peak flow factor
of 2.5 as delineated in the Request For Proposal. A high peak flow factor will
increase size, and a lower peak flow will reduce the size with respect to
increases and decreases in the cost.
The sample principle as above applies to the actual organic and solids loading
to be treated. Overstated values will dictate a design that may be too
conservative. It is significant to note that the Parsons approach to design
is, in general, conservative in order to incorporate an appropriate level of
reliability.
SXD/1682 C-1 080488
CAPISTRANO VALLEY WASTEWATER AUTHORITY
TENTATIVE WASTEWATER CHARACTERIZATION
Average Daily Flow, mgd
6.3
Peak Daily Flow, mgd
15.75
Peak Flow Factor
2.5
TBOD, mg/l
250
SBOD, mg/l
100
TSS, mg/l
250
VSS, mg/l
215
NH3-N, mg/l
35
Alakalinity as CaCO3, mg/l
250
PO4-P, mg/l
10
Total Dissolved Solids
1000 - 4000
pH, units
7.5
Temperature, degrees Celcius
20
Note: The above characterization is based on available data and several
assumptions. Prior to preliminary design, values will be verified.
Parsons
C-2
P/ARSONS-
APPENDIX D
ALTERNATIVE PROCESS DESCRIPTIONS
The process assumptions and criteria are based on the wastewater
characterization described in the previous section. Each process alternative
• is described herein as the process train description and operating system.
Enclosed in this section is a tabulated presentation of design criteria in
sufficient detail to prepare a basic cost estimate and evaluate the process
integrity.
•
CONVENTIONAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE TREATMENT
After the raw wastewater is transported from the main pump station, it enters
the headworks structure. The structure contains two mechanically cleaned bar
screens and a bypass channel, an aerated grit removal system with a bypass,
7 and a two-stage odor -control system. This unit process is enclosed or covered
` to minimize any odors. Screening and grit are collected in an enclosed
dumpster for subsequent hauling and landfill disposal.
I•
After preliminary treatment, the wastewater is evenly split to three primary
clarifiers. The clarifiers are covered and vented by aeration blowers. Primary
scum, which consists primarily of grease and other floatable materials, is
pumped to the dissolved air flotation thickener. Primary sludges are thickened
in the clarifiers and then pumped directly into the anaerobic digester. The
units are configured so that any two units can be taken out of service.
The primary clarifier effluent then flows to the activated sludge system.
Normal operation consists of standard serpentine flow through the three
reactors, but the system is also configured for parallel flow so that units
ISYD/1682 D-1 080488
•
PARSONS -
can be taken out of service. The aeration system consists of either swing
diffusers or a grid -type system. Both options use high -efficiency diffusers.
The mixed liquor is evenly split to four final clarifiers. Scum is pumped to
I
the dissolved air flotation thickener. Return activated sludge is collected
into a common wet well
and then
pumped to the biological reactors. Waste
j
activated sludge is thickened to
approximately 3.5% to 4.0% solids in the
dissolved air flotation
thickener
prior to introduction to the anaerobic
digester. Facilities are
provided
to chlorinate the return activated sludge
•
for filament and bulking
control.
The effluent is then disinfected by chlorination in the chlorine contact
chamber. A flash mixing system is used for immediate mixing of the chlorine
• solution to maximize disinfection at the lowest effective dosage rate.
Adequate chlorination capacity for prechlorination and return activated sludge
is provided.
•
Sludge digestion and dewatering is discussed at the end of the process
descriptions.
SEQUENTIAL BATCH REACTORS
After the raw wastewater is transported from the main pump station, it enters
the headworks structure. The structure contains two rotary screens and a
bypass channel, an aerated grit removal system with a bypass, and a two-stage
odor -control system. This unit process is enclosed or covered to minimize any
odors. Screening and grit are collected in an enclosed dumpster for subsequent
hauling and landfill disposal.
After preliminary treatment the wastewater flows into the last decanted
reactor, which is at its minimum level, and fills the reactor. The mixing
system is operated during the fill period without oxygenation for the anoxic
mode period. At a preset time oxygenation commences. After a preset time or
when the reactor fills to the maximum level, the mixing and oxygenation is
SYD/1682 D-2 080488
•
•
�•
10
PARSONS -
terminated for settling. After the settling or decant period, the clarified or
decant liquor is discharged to the equalization basin. After decant, the fill
cycle commences. This operation occurs sequentially in all three reactors so
that the constant flow from the pretreatment system can be accepted.
The purpose of the equalization basin is to attenuate surges from the reactor
blowdown. During low -flow periods, the flow from the equalization basin is fed
at a constant rate in order to maximize disinfection.
The effluent is then disinfected by chlorination in the chlorine contact
chamber. A flash mixing system is used for immediate mixing of the chlorine
solution to maximize disinfection at the lowest effective dosage rate.
Adequate chlorination capacity for prechlorination Will be provided.
Sludge is removed during the settling period from each reactor and pumped to
an aerated holding tank for subsequent dewatering and disposal. No digestion
is required due to the high mean cell residence time of the system.
Specific preliminary design criteria is included in this appendix.
BIOTOWER SYSTEM
After the raw wastewater is transported from the main pump station, it enters
the headworks structure. The structure contains two mechanically cleaned bar
screens and a bypass channel, an aerated grit removal system with a bypass,
and a two stage odor control system. This unit process will be enclosed or
covered to minimized any odors. Screening and grit are collected in an
enclosed dumpster for subsequent hauling and landfill disposal.
After preliminary treatment, the wastewater is evenly split to three primary
clarifiers. The clarifiers are covered and vented by the tower blowers.
Primary scum, which consists primarily of grease and other floatable
materials, is pumped directly to the anaerobic digester. Primary sludges
SYD/1682 D-3 . 080488
PARSONS -
are .thickened in the clarifiers and pumped directly into the anaerobic
digester. The units are configured so that any two units can be taken out of
service.
After primary clarification the clarified effluent is pumped to the biotowers
by variable -speed pumps. The pumps can be set for constant flow, flow
matching, and flow plus a recycle rate based on percent of flow. The biotower
effluent flows by displacement to the final clarification system.
The final clarifier scum and sludge are returned to the primary clarifier
{ influent system and subsequently combined with the primary sludge and scum
with eventual transport to the anaerobic digester.
I
The effluent is then disinfected
by chlorination
in the chlorine contact
chamber.
A flash mixing system is
used for immediate mixing of the chlorine
a
solution
to maximize disinfection at the lowest
effective dosage rate.
Adequate
chlorination capacity for
preeblorination is
provided.
Specific preliminary design criteria is included in this appendix.
SUBMERGED BIOLOGICAL CONTACTORS
After the raw wastewater is transported from the main pump station, it enters
the headworks structure. The structure contains two rotary screens and a
bypass channel, an aerated grit removal system with a bypass, and a two-stage
odor control system. This unit process is enclosed or covered to minimize any
odors. Screening and grit are collected in an enclosed dumpster for subsequent
hauling and landfill disposal.
After preliminary treatment, the wastewater flows to the submerged biological
contactor system. The normal flow sequence is a two-stage system where the
flow is evenly split to each process train. Adequate piping is provided for
flexibility so that discrete contactors can be shut down for service without
sacrificing the effluent quality. Flexibility is also provided by other
SYA/1662 D-4 080488
I•
PARSONS -
process options such as reducing the number of trains and increasing the
• number of stages. The aeration system is installed at the leading and trailing
edge of each shaft in order to control the rotational speed. The diffuser
submergence is approximately 18 ft where optimum oxygen transfer will occur
for support of the biological growth. The biologically treated water then
ip flows to the final clarification system consisting of four final clarifiers.
Specific preliminary design criteria is included in this appendix.
i EFFLUENT TRANSPORT TO SERRA OUTFALL
To convey the plant effluent from the proposed treatment plant to the SERRA
plant outfall surge tower, a plant effluent pumping station and land outfall
will be required. The pumping station will be designed to pump at least two
times the average dry weather flow or about 12.6 mgd. The pumping station
would probably be designed with three variable -speed pumps with capacities up
to 4,400 gpm each. They could be engine or motor driven, depending on economic
considerations and the availability of sludge gas for powering engine drives.
The effluent pumping station is estimated to cost approximately $275,000.
ANAEROBIC DIGESTION
Anaerobic digestion is provided for all processes excepting the sequential
batch reactor system. Sludge is introduced to the digester as described in the
above system descriptions.
�•
SYD/1682 D-5 080488
1•
The final clarifier scum
and sludge are pumped directly
to the anaerobic
i
digester.
•
The effluent will then be
disinfected by chlorination in the
chlorine contact
1
chamber. A flash mixing
system will be used for immediate mixing of the
chlorine solution to maximize disinfection at the lowest
effective dosage
rate. Adequate chlorination capacity for prechlorination will
be provided.
Specific preliminary design criteria is included in this appendix.
i EFFLUENT TRANSPORT TO SERRA OUTFALL
To convey the plant effluent from the proposed treatment plant to the SERRA
plant outfall surge tower, a plant effluent pumping station and land outfall
will be required. The pumping station will be designed to pump at least two
times the average dry weather flow or about 12.6 mgd. The pumping station
would probably be designed with three variable -speed pumps with capacities up
to 4,400 gpm each. They could be engine or motor driven, depending on economic
considerations and the availability of sludge gas for powering engine drives.
The effluent pumping station is estimated to cost approximately $275,000.
ANAEROBIC DIGESTION
Anaerobic digestion is provided for all processes excepting the sequential
batch reactor system. Sludge is introduced to the digester as described in the
above system descriptions.
�•
SYD/1682 D-5 080488
1•
PARSONS -
The hydraulic residence time of the system is 30 days at design flow which is
• adequate for good stabilization. The digester is heated by a boiler heat
exchanger. During the preliminary engineering stage, a gas engine with vapor
phase cooling for heat recovery and subsequent digester heating will be
evaluated. The engine would be used to produce electrical power or directly
drive a mechanical element such as pumps or aeration blowers.
SLUDGE DEWATERING
A three -belt press will be provided for all candidate systems. The press has a
•
gravity thickening zone independent of the press operation. This approach
allows a varied concentration of sludge input without sacrificing the solids
concentration of the cake. For the anaerobic sludges, it is intended to
dewater all the sludge with no supernatant return to the system.
•
After dewatering, the sludge is conveyed to a truck for hauling to the
landfill.
•
SYD/1682 D-6 080488
I•
0
•
is
C
[7
CAPISTRANO VALLEY WASYEWATER AUTHORITY
CONVENTIONAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE SYSTEM
PRELIMINARY DESIGN CRITERIA
HEADWORKS
Bar Screens, Number
Capacity Each, mgd
Aerated Grit Removal
PRIMARY CLARIFICATION
Number of Tanks
Length, ft
Width, ft
Depth, ft
Overflow Rate @ Peak Flow, gpdsf
Overflow Rate @ ADF, gdsf
Suspended Solids Removal, %
BOD Removal, %
BIOLOGICAL REACTORS
Number of Tanks
Length, ft
Width, ft
Depth, ft
Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids, mg/l
Mean Cell Residence Time, days
Number of Blowers
Capacity, scfm each
Horsepower each unit
SECONDARY CLARIFICATION
Number of Tanks
Length, ft
Width, ft
Depth, ft
Overflow Rate @ Peak Flow, gpdsf
Overflow Rate @ ADF, gpdsf
Number of RAS Pumps
Capacity, each gpm
Horsepower, each
• D-7
2
11
1
3
120
20
9
2188
875
47
36
3
120
24
18
2500
<7
2
9000
600
4
165
20
14
1200
480
3
2200
20
Parsons
•
is
CONVENTIONAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE SYSTEM
(Continued)
CHLORINATION
Number of Tanks 2
Length, ft 73
Width, ft 30
Depth, ft 10
Retention Time @ 15.7 mgd, min. 30
Retention Time @ 6.3 mgd, min. 75
DISSOLVED AIR FLOTATION THICKENING
Number of Units
1
Diameter, feet
32
Depth, feet
9
Solids Loading, lbs/ft2/day
20
Recycle Flow, gpm
300
Recycle Pressure, psia
75
I
Parsons
CAPISTRANO VALLEY WASYEWATER AUTHORITY
SLUDGE TREATMENT AND DEWATERING
PRELIMINARY DESIGN CRITERIA
ANAEROBIC DIGESTTION
Number of Tanks 1
Hydraulic Residence, days 30
Boiler Heat Exchanger, Number 1
Gas Mixing System, scfm TBD
Operating Temperature, Degrees F 95
SLUDGE DEWATERING
Three Belt Press, Number 1
Top Belt Width, meters 3
Bottom Belt Width, meters 2
Capacity, lbs per hour 1200
Note: The anaerobic digesters are common to all processes excepting the
sequential batch reactor system were an aerated sludge holding tank will be
utilized. The belt press is common to all systems.
[:
Parsons
Is D-9
CAPISTRANO VALLEY WASYEWATER AUTHORITY
SEQUENTIAL BIOLOGICAL REACTOR SYSTEM
PRELIMINARY DESIGN CRITERIA
HEADWORKS
Rotary Screens, Number 2
Capacity Each, mgd 11
Aerated Grit Removal 1
BIOLOGICAL REACTORS
Number of Tanks
3
Length, ft
179
Width, ft
59
Max Depth, ft
18
Min Depth, ft
12
Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids, mg/l
3200
Mean Cell Residence Time, days
>25
Number of Blowers per basin
1
Total Number of Blowers
4
Capacity, scfm each
9000
Horsepower each Blower
150
Numbers per Basin
1
Capacity of each Pump, gpm
15380
Horsepower per pump
100
Cycles per Day
14
Decant flow, gpm
15799
EQUALIZATION TANK
Number of Tanks 1
Volume, gallons 400,000
CHLORINATION
Number of Tanks 2
Length, ft 73
Width, ft 30
Depth, ft 10
Retention Time @ 15.7 mgd, min. 30
Retention Time @ 6.3 mgd, min. 75
Persons
D-10
CAPISTRANO VALLEY WASYEWATER AUTHORITY
BIOTOWER SYSTEM
PRELIMINARY DESIGN CRITERIA
HEADWORKS
Bar Screens, Number 2
Capacity Each, mgd 11
Aerated Grit Removal 1
PRIMARY CLARIFICATION
Number of Tanks 3
Length, ft 120
Width, ft 20
Depth, ft 9
Overflow Rate @ Peak Flow, gpdsf 2188
Overflow Rate @ ADF, gdsf 875
Suspended Solids Removal, % 47
BOD Removal, % 36
BIOTOWER REACTORS
Number of Towers
3
Diameter, ft
80
Depth, ft
24
Design Loading, lbs BOD/1000FT3
35
Number of Feed Pumps
6
Capacity, gpm each
7000
Horsepower each pump
100
SECONDARY CLARIFICATION
Number of Tanks 4
Length, ft 140
Width, ft 20
Depth, ft 10
Overflow Rate @ Peak Flow, gpdsf 1400
Overflow Rate @ ADF, gpdsf 560
Parsons
D-11
BIOTOWER SYSTEM SYSTEM
(Continued)
CHLORINATION
Number of Tanks 2
Length, ft 73
Width, ft 30
Depth, ft 10
Retention Time @ 15.7 mgd, min. 30
Retention Time @ 6.3 mgd, min. 75
Parsons
4 D-12
CAPISTRANO VALLEY WASYEWATER AUTHORITY
SUBMERGED BIOLOGICAL CONTACTOR SYSTEM
PRELIMINARY DESIGN CRITERIA
HEADWORKS
Rotary Screens, Number 2
Capacity Each, mgd 11
Aerated Grit Removal, Number 1
BIOLOGICAL CONTACTORS
Number of Trains
2
Number of Stages
2
Surface Area First Stage, ft2
865500
Surface Area Second Stage. ft2
865500
Design Loading, lbs SBOD/1000FT2
1.5
Number of Blowers
2
Capacity, scfm each
8000
Horsepower each blower
100
SECONDARY CLARIFICATION
Number of Tanks 4
Length, ft 140
Width, ft 20
Depth, ft 10
Overflow Rate @ Peak Flow, gpdsf 1400
Overflow Rate @ ADF, gpdsf 560
CHLORINATION
Number of Tanks 2
Length, ft 73
Width, ft 30
Depth, ft 10
Retention Time @ 15.7 mgd, min. 30
Retention Time @ 6.3 mgd, min. 75
Parsons
D-13
1•
1*
1•
f•
u
•
PARSONS -
APPENDIX E
COMPUTER MODELS AND MASS BALANCE DIAGRAMS
This appendix contains idealized mathematical computer models of three of the
candidate systems. The sequential batch reactor system was not modeled because
the available operating data is limited to the point where statistically valid
algorithms cannot develop.
The computer models, prepared by Parsons, have been in existence for over six
years and have been field verified as to accuracy. Documentation on the models
is available through Instructional Resources Information Systems, Ohio State
University or through Parsons.
Mass balance diagrams for all four processes are included at the end of the
appendix.
SYD/1682 E-1 080888
1•
Ir
I•
iib
CAPISTRANO VALLEY WASTEWATER AUTHORITY
CONVENTIONAL ACITIVATED SLUDGE OPTION
IDEALIZED MATHEMATICAL MODEL
FOR
PROCESS SCREENING
AND
CRITERIA EVALUATION
E-2
Persons
10
10
I*
6•
6•
10
10
DATE: 07-27-1988
TIME: 03:38
W A S T E W A T E R C H A R A C T E R I Z A T I O N
AVERAGE DRY WEATHER FLOW MGD: 6.3
PEAK DRY WEATHER FLOW MGD: 15.75
DESIGN FLOW MGD: 6.3
INFLUENT BOD MG/L: 250
INFLUENT TSS MG/L: 250
INFLUENT VSS (X): 86 #
TEMPERATURE 'C: 20
TKN MG/L: 35
ALKALINITY MG/L: 250
PH 7.5
PO4-P MG/L: 10
MAXIMUM MLSS 2500
MAXIMUM MCRT 8.2
DEFAULT VALUE USED
PLANT C O N F I C3LJ R A T I O N A N D ]DIMENSIONS
DESIGN AVERAGE DAILY FLOW (MGD) . -1
DESIGN PEAK WET WEATHER FLOW (MGD): -1
P R I M A R Y C L A R I F I C A T I O N
---------------------
NUMBER OF RECTANGULAR CLARIFIERS: 3
DIMENSIONS EACH TOTAL
---------- ---- -----
LENGTH (FT):120.0
WIDTH (FT): 20.0
DEPTH (FT): 9.00
WEIR LTH (FT): 210 630
SFC AREA (FT2): 2400 7200
TOTAL WEIR LENGTH (FT): 630
TOTAL SURFACE AREA (FT -2): 7200
E-3
Parsons
I*
10
1*
II•
I,*
I*
ke
I•
R E A C T O R S
NUMBER OF RECTANGULAR REACTORS:
DIMENSIONS EACH
---------- ----
LENGTH (FT): 120.0
WIDTH (FT): 24.0
DEPTH (FT): 18.0
E-4
3
Persons
It
SECONDARY CLARIFICATION
-----------------------
NUMBER OF RECTANGULAR CLARIFIERS: 4
DIMENSIONS EACH TOTAL
LENGTH (FT):165.0
WIDTH (FT): 20.0
DEPTH (FT): 14.00
WEIR LTH (FT): 350 1400
SFC AREA (FT2): 3300 13200
TOTAL WEIR LENGTH (FT): 1400
TOTAL SURFACE AREA (FT'2): 13200
S L U DG E H A N D L I N G
---------------
TYPE OF DIGESTION: ANAEROBIC
NUMBER OF PRIMARY DIGESTERS: 2
#1 02
VOLUME (GAL): 561000 561000
DIGESTER HEATED Y Y
DIGESTER MIXED Y Y
E-5
DATE: 07-27-1988
TIME: 03:38
Parsons
1*
Ie
10
[7
10
l0
f0
Parsons
19 E-6
CAPISTRANO VALLEY WWA
DATE:
07-27-1988
TIME:
03:39
BOD:
250
TSS:
250
TEMP
20
PRIMARY
TREATMENT SYSTEM
PERFORMANCE
x
x
x
x *
*
x *
* FLOW
* PCE BOD
* PCE TSS
* PS *
PS
* PS
* SL
* MGD
* MG/L
* MG/L
* LBS/DAY *
%M
* GPD
* GPSFD x
*
*
*
* x
*
* *
x*x***x**xxxxxxxx**xxxxx*xxxx**x*****x*******x***xx*xx*x***********xxxxxxxxxxx
4.73
145
114
5340
6.00
10671
656
4.91
147
117
5451
6.00
10894
682
5.09
149
119
5559
6.00
11109
707
5.27
151
121
5663
6.00
11318
732
5.45
152
123
5765
6.00
11520
758
5.64
154
125
5863
6.00
11716
783
5.82
155
127
5958
6.00
11906
808
6.00
157
129
6050
6.00
12091
834
6.18
158
131
6140
6.00
12270
859
6.37
159
133
6227
6.00
12444
884
6.55
161
134
6312
6.00
12613
910
6.73
162
136
6394
6.00
12777
935
6.91
163
138
6474
6.00
12938
960
7.10
164
139
6552
6.00
13094
986
7.28
165
141
6628
6.00
13245
1011
7.46
166
142
6702
6.00
13393
1036
7.64
167
144
6774
6.00
13538
1062
7.83
168
145
6845
6.00
13678
1087
8.01
169
146
6913
6.00
13816
1112
8.19
170
148
6980
6.00
13950
1137
Parsons
19 E-6
•
•
CAPISTRANO VALLEY WWA
DATE: 07-27-1988
TIME: 03:39
BOD: 250
TSS: 250
TEMP 20
BIOLOGICAL REACTOR PERFORMANCE, PAGE 1
***xx*x***x*x*********x*xx**********x*x****x*x****xxx*******x**xx*x******
x * * * * x * * * *
* FLOW * MAX x MLVSS * F/M * MCRT * SVI x RAS x RAS x WAS
u
E-7
Parsons
MGD *
MLSS *
% *
•
DAYS *
*
MGA *
MG/L
*LBS/DAY*
* *
*
*
*
*
*
*
* *
4.73
2455
77
0.31
8.53
120
1.97
8357
2792
4.91
2450
78
0.33
7.97
128
2.25
7804
2982
5.09
2445
78
0.34
7.47
136
2.54
7343
3174
1
5.27
2440
78
0.36
7.03
144
2.85
6954
3369
5.45
2436
78
0.38
6.63
151
3.18
6621
3567
5.64
2432
78
0.39
6.26
158
3.51
6334
3767
5.62
2429
78
0.41
5.94
164
3.87
6085
3970
6.00
2426
78
0.43
5.64
170
4.23
5867
4175
6.18
2423
78
0.44
5.36
176
4.61
5675
4382
6.37
2420
79
0.46
5.11
182
5.00
5504
4591
6.55
2418
79
0.48
4.88
187
5.40
5352
4802
6.73
2415
79
0.49
4.67
192
5.81
5215
5014
6.91
2413
79
0.51
4.48
196
6.23
5092
5228
7.10
2411
79
0.53
4.30
201
6.66
4981
5444
•
7.28
2409
79
0.54
4.13
205
7.10
4880
5661
'
7.46
2408
79
0.56
3.97
209
7.55
4787
5879
7.64
2406
79
0.58
3.83
213
8.01
4703
6099
•
7.83
2404
79
0.60
3.69
216
8.47
4625
6320
8.01
2403
79
0.61
3.56
220
8.95
4554
6542
8.19
2402
79
0.63
3.44
223
9.43
4488
6766
u
E-7
Parsons
I*
1*
I*
Ee
10
L0
I*
f•
CAPISTRANO VALLEY WWA
BIOLOGICAL REACTOR PERFORMANCE, PAGE 2
I • E-8
DATE: 07-27-1988
TIME: 03:39
BOD: 250
TSS: 250
TEMP 20
Persons
x *
* LOAD x
* FLOW *
DET
TIME
* LB BOD*
OUR
*02 RGD.*
* MGD *
HAS
* DAYS
* /1000 *
MG/L
*LBS/DAY*
* *
*
* FT3 *
/HR
********x****x****x*xx******xx****xx**x***xxx*x*x
4.73
5.91
0.25
36.8
23.6
5499
4.91
5.69
0.24
38.7
24.5
5715
5.09
5.49
0.23
40.6
25.5
5926
5.27
5.30
0.22
42.6
26.3
6133
5.45
5.12
0.21
44.5
27.2
6335
5.64
4.95
0.21
46.5
28.1
6533
5.82
4.80
0.20
48.5
28.9
6727
6.00
4.65
0.19
50.4
29.7
6916
6.18
4.51
0.19
52.4
30.5
7100
6.37
4.39
0.18
54.4
31.3
7280
6.55
4.26
0.18
56.4
32.0
7455
6.73
4.15
0.17
58.4
32.8
7626
6.91
4.04
0.17
60.5
33.5
7792
7.10
3.93
0.16
62.5
34.2
7954
7.28
3.84
0.16
64.5
34.8
8110
7.46
3.74
0.16
66.5
35.5
8262
7.64
3.65
0.15
68.6
36.1
6409
7.83
3.57
0.15
70.6
36.7
8551
8.01
3.49
0.15
72.7
37.3
8688
8.19
3.41
0.14
74.7
37.9
8819
I • E-8
DATE: 07-27-1988
TIME: 03:39
BOD: 250
TSS: 250
TEMP 20
Persons
I•
le
Parsons
1 • E-9
CAPISTRANO
VALLEY WWA
DATE:
07-27-1988
TIME:
03:39
BOD:
250
SSS:
250
TEMP
20
FINAL
CLARIFIER
PERFORMANCE AND
EFFLUENT
CHARACTERISTICS
*
K
#
* #
K
# K
K
* FLOW
* DET.
* DOB
* EFF *
EFF
* EFF
* EFF *
EFF #
* MGD
* TIME
* FT
* BOD *
TSS
* NH3
* NO3 *
PO4-P *
*
* HRS.
*
* MG/L *
MG/L
* MG/L
* MG/L *
MG/L *
4.73
7.0
9.89
7
11
31.1
<1.0
6.2
4.91
6.8
9.61
8
12
31.0
<1.0
6.1
5.09
6.5
9.34
9
12
30.9
<1.0
6.1
5.27
6.3
9.09
10
13
30.8
<1.0
6.1
5.45
6.1
8.85
10
14
30.7
<1.0
6.1
5.64
5.9
8.62
11
15
30.6
<1.0
6.1
5.82
5.7
8.41
12
16
30.5
<1.0
6.0
6.00
5.5
8.21
13
17
30.4
<1.0
6.0
6.18
5.4
8.02
14
18
30.3
<1.0
6.0
6.37
5.2
7.84
15
19
30.2
<1.0
8.0
6.55
5.1
7.68
16
20
30.2
<1.0
6.0
6.73
4.9
7.52
16
22
30.1
<1.0
6.0
6.91
4.8
7.37
17
23
30.0
<1.0
5.9
7.10
4.7
7.22
18
24
29.9
<1.0
5.9
7.28
4.6
7.09
19
25
29.9
<1.0
5.9
7.46
4.4
6.96
20
26
29.8
<1.0
5.9
7.64
4.3
6.84
21
28
29.7
41.0
5.9
7.83
4.2
6.72
22
29
29.7
<1.0
5.9
8.01
4.1
6.61
23
30
29.6
<1.0
5.9
8.19
4.1
6.51
24
32
29.6
<1.0
5.9
Parsons
1 • E-9
Parsons
E-10
CAPISTRANO VALLEY WWA
DATE:
07-27-1988
TIME:
03:39
BOD:
250
TSS:
250
TEMP
20
SECONDARY
SYSTEM PERFORMANCE
******************************************************************************
* FLOW
* CLARIFIER
LOAD
* SEC. SLUDGE PROD *
TOTAL SLUDGE
PROD
* MGD
* SFC *
WEIR
* LBS TSS
* LBS VSS*
LHS TSS
* LBS VSS *
% SOL
* GPD
*
* GPSFD *
GPLFD
*
******************************************************************************
4.73
358
3375
2792
2161
6132
6753
3.60
27068
4.91
372
3507
2984
2315
8437
7004
3.56
28438
5.09
386
3635
3174
2467
8734
7248
3.52
29782
5.27
399
3764
3367
2621
9029
7491
3.48
31136
5.45
413
3892
3562
2778
9324
7734
3.44
32500
5.64
427
4028
3771
2946
9635
7969
3.40
33949
5.82
441
4157
3971
3106
9929
8230
3.37
35330
6.00
455
4285
4173
3269
10223
6471
3.34
36719
6.18
466
4414
4376
3433
10515
8711
3.31
38114
6.37
483
4550
4595
3608
10824
8964
3.26
39595
6.55
496
4678
4803
3775
11115
9203
3.25
41003
6.73
510
4807
5013
3943
11406
9442
3.22
42418
6.91
523
4935
5224
4113
11697
9680
3.20
43838
7.10
538
5071
5449
4294
12003
9930
3.17
45342
7.28
552
5199
5663
4466
12292
10167
3.15
46771
7.46
565
5328
5879
4639
12581
10403
3.13
48206
7.64
579
5457
6096
4814
12869
10639
3.11
49644
7.83
593
5592
6326
4999
13172
10887
3.09
51166
8.01
607
5721
6545
5175
13460
11121
3.07
52612
8.19
620
5649
6766
5352
13746
11355
3.05
54062
Parsons
E-10
CAPISTRANO VALLEY WASTEWATER AUTHORITY
BIOTOWER SYSTEM OPTION
IDEALIZED MATHEMATICAL MODEL
FOR
PROCESS SCREENING
AND
CRITERIA EVALUATION
Parsons
E-11
N•
1•
10
e
�0
I•
DATE: 07-27-1988
TIME: 03:32
W A S T MW A T E R CHARACTER I Z A T I O N
AVERAGE DRY WEATHER FLOW MGD: 6.3
DAILY PEAK FLOW MGD: 15.75
DESIGN FLOW MGD: 6.3
INFLUENT BOD MG/L: 250
INFLUENT TSS MG/L: 250
INFLUENT VSS (%): 66
TEMPERATURE "C: 20
TKH MG/L: 35
ALKALINITY MG/L: 250
PH 7.5
PO4-P MG/L: 10
DEFAULT VALUE USED
P LAN T C O N F I G U R A T I O N AND DIMENSIONS
DESIGN AVERAGE DAILY FLOW (MGD) -1
DESIGN PEAK WET WEATHER FLOW (MGD): -1
PRIMARY C L A R I F I C A T I O N
---------------------
NUMBER OF RECTANGULAR CLARIFIERS: 3
DIMENSIONS EACH TOTAL
---------- ---- -----
LENGTH (FT): 120.0
WIDTH (FT): 20.0
DEPTH (FT): 9.00
WEIR LTH (FT): 210 630
SFC AREA (FT2): 2400 7200
TOTAL WEIR LENGTH (FT): 630
TOTAL SURFACE AREA (FT'2): 7200
E-12
Parsons
DATE: 07-27-1988
TIME: 03:32
TRICKLING F I L T E R S
-----------------
PRIMARY FILTER
--------------
MEDIA TYPE: STACKED PLASTIC
NUMBER OF TRICKLING FILTERS: 2
DIMENSIONS EACH
-------------- ----
DIAMETER (FT): 80.0
DEPTH (FT): 24.00
PERCENT FLOW M : 25
TOTAL VOLUME OF FILTERS (FT -3): 241274
Parsons
E-13
10
1*
Is
I*
lie
[7
S E C O N D A R Y C L A R I F I C A T I O N
-----------------------
NUMBER OF RECTANGULAR CLARIFIERS: 4
DIMENSIONS EACH TOTAL
LENGTH (FT): 140.0
WIDTH (FT): 20.0
DEPTH (FT): 10.00
WEIR LTH (FT): 350 1400
SFC AREA (FT2): 2800 11200
TOTAL WEIR LENGTH (FT): 1400
TOTAL SURFACE AREA (FT -2): 11200
SLLIDGR HANDLINO
---------------
TYPE OF DIGESTION: ANAEROBIC
NUMBER OF PRIMARY DIGESTERS: 1
K1
VOLUME (GAL): 750000
DIGESTER HEATED Y
DIGESTER MIXED Y
E-14
DATE: 07-27-1988
TIME: 03:32
Parsons
1•
1*
[7
f•
1•
CAPISTRANO VALLEY WWA
DATE: 07-27-1988
TIME: 03:32
BOD: 250
TSS: 250
TEMP 20
PRIMARY S Y S T E M L OA D I N Q S
****************************************
*
*
*
*
* FLOW
* CLAR.
LOADINGS *
DETN *
* MGD
* SURFACE
* WEIR *
TIME *
*
* GPDSF
* GPD/FT *
HRS. *
****************************************
4.73
656
7500
2.5
4.91
682
7793
2.4
5.09
707
8079
2.3
5.27
732
8365
2.2
5.45
757
8650
2.1
5.64
783
Q952
2.1
5.82
808
9238
2.0
6.00
833
9523
1.9
6.18
858
9809
1.9
6.37
885
10111
1.8
6.55
910
10396
1.8
6.73
935
10682
1.7
6.91
960
10968
1.7
7.10
986
11269
1.6
7.28
1011
11555
1.6
7.46
1036
11841
1.6
7.64
1061
12126
1.5
7.83
1088
12428
1.5
8.01
1113
12714
1.5
8.19
1138
12999
1.4
E-15
Parsons
Parsons
E-16
CAPISTRANO
VALLEY
NMA
DATE:
07-27-1988
TIME:
03:32
BOD:
250
TSS:
250
TEMP
20
PRIMARY S Y S T E M
P E R F O R M A
N C E
#s**#*####s#####*****###s##*#*s***##s*##s#**#s***#***ss***#***#**#####*####*##
#
*
#
#
*
# FLOW
* X
REMOVAL
*P.C. EFF MG/L
# PRIMARY SLUDGE PROD.
* MGD
* BOD
* TSS
* BOD
* TSS
*LBS TSS*LBS
VSS*
X SOL*
GPD
*
*
#
*
#
* *
*
*
*
4.73
42
54
145
114
5340
4592
6.20
10327
4.91
41
53
147
117
5453
4689
6.20
10545
5.09
40
52
149
119
5559
4781
6.20
10751
5.27
40
52
151
121
5662
4870
6.20
10950
5.45
39
51
152
123
5762
4955
6.20
11144
5.64
38
50
154
125
5864
5043
6.20
11341
5.82
38
49
155
127
5958
5124
6.20
11523
6.00
37
48
157
129
6049
5202
6.20
11699
6.18
37
48
158
131
6138
5279
6.20
11870
6.37
36
47
159
133
6229
5357
6.20
12046
6.55
36
46
161
134
6312
5428
6.20
12207
6.73
35
46
162
136
6393
5498
6.20
12364
6.91
35
45
163
138
6473
5566
6.20
12517
7.10
34
44
164
139
6554
5636
6.20
12675
7.28
34
44
165
141
8629
5701
6.20
12820
7.46
33
43
166
142
6702
5764
6.20
12961
7.64
33
43
167
144
6773
5825
6.20
13099
7.83
33
42
168
145
6846
5888
6.20
13241
8.01
32
41
169
146
8914
5946
6.20
13372
8.19
32
41
170
148
6980
6003
6.20
13500
Parsons
E-16
g•
1•
1•
I•
i•
i•
•
E-17
Parsons
CAPISTRANO VALLEY WWA
DATE:
U7-27-1988
TINE:
03:32
BOD:
250
TSS:
250
TEMP
20
SE C ONDAi2Y
SYSTEM
L OAD S NQ S
tttttttsst,tttts:s:t:ttttts+ttt+ssss:ttstst*ss
t+aar*a*tsts
x2 *
t
t t
+ FLOW*FILTER
LOADING*RECIR.*FILTER LOADING*RECIR.*
CLAP. LOADINGS*CLARIFIER t
t MGD *
* 0 BOD *RATIO *
* 0 HOD *RATIO *SURFACE*
WEIR
*DETN. TIME*
* *
GPDSFt1000FT3*
X *
GPDSFt1DDDFT3*
X *
GPDSF *
GPD/FT* .ERS.
* t
t t
*
* *
*
*
* *
4.73
470
24
50
NA
NA
NA
422
3375
4.3
4.96
493
25
50
NA
NA
NA
443
9542
4.1
5.14
511
27
50
NA
NA
NA
459
3672
3.9
5.32
530
28
50
NA
NA
NA
475
3B02
3.8
5.51
548
29
50
NA
NA
NA
492
3932
3.7
5.70
567
30
s0
WA
SA
NA
509
4069
3.5
5.88
585
32
50
NA
NA
NA
525
4199
3.4
6.06
603
33
50
NA
NA
NA
541
4329
3.3
6.24
621
34
50
NA
NA
NA
557
4456
3.2
6.43
640
36
5D
NA
NA
NA
'574
4585
3.1
6.62
656
37
50
NA
NA
NA
591
4725
3.0
6.80
676
38
50
NA
NA
NA
807
4655
3.0
6.98
694
39
50
NA
NA
NA
623
4895
2.9
7.17
713
41
50
NA
NA
NA
640
5122
2.8
7.35
731
42
50
NA
NA
NA
857
5252
2.7
7.54
750
43
50
NA
NA
NA
673
5392
2.7
7.72
768
45
SD
NA
NA
NA
689
5512
2.6
7.91
787
46
s0
NA
NA
NA
706
5649
2.5
8.09
605
47
50
NA
-NA
NA
722
5779
2.5
8.27
623
49
50
NA
NA
NA
739
5909
2.4
E-17
Parsons
10
10
10
I*
CAPISTRANO VALLEY NWA
DATE: 07-27-1988
TIME: 03:32
BOD: 250
TSS: 250
TEMP 20
SECONDARY S Y S T E M P E R F O R M A N C E
* FLOW * EFF CONC. MG/L * SEC. SLUDGE PROD * TOTAL SLUDGE PROD
* MGD * BOD * SS * LBS TSS * LBS VSS* LBS TSS * LBS VSS * X SOL * GPD
******************************************************************************
4.73
27
24
2654
2022
7994
6615
3.65
26238
4.91
28
25
2793
2123
8245
6812
3.62
27288
5.09
29
26
2928
2221
8488
7002
3.60
28307
5.27
30
27
3065
2319
8727
7188
3.57
29323
5.45
31
27
3201
2417
8963
7373
3.54
30336
5.64
31
28
3346
2521
9210
7564
3.52
31402
5.82
32
29
3484
2619
9442
7743
3.49
32409
6.00
33
30
3622
2718
9671
7920
3.47
33414
6.18
34
31
3761
2816
9898
8094
3.45
34416
6.37
35
32
3907
2920
10136
8276
3.43
35470
6.55
36
33
4046
3018
10358
8446
3.41
36466
6.73
37
33
4186
3116
10579
8615
3.39
37459
6.91
37
34
4325
3215
10798
8781
3.37
38449
7.10
38
35
4473
3318
11027
8954
3.35
39492
7.28
39
36
4613
3416
11242
9117
3.33
40477
7.46
40
36
4754
3514
11455
9278
3.31
41460
7.64
40
37
4894
3612
11667
9437
3.30
42439
7.83
41
38
5042
3715
11889
9603
3.28
43471
8.01
42
39
5183
3813
12097
9759
3.26
44445
8.19
43
39
5324
3911
12304
9914
3.25
45418
Parsons
le E-18
li
CAPISTRANO VALLEY WASTEWATER AUTHORITY
SUBMERGED BIOLOGICAL CONTACTOR OPTION
IDEALIZED MATHEMATICAL MODEL
FOR
PROCESS SCREENING
AND
CRITERIA EVALUATION
E-19
Parsons
I*
le
�0
Parsons
10 E-20
DATE: 07-27-1888
TIME: 03:45
WA S T E W A T E R
C HA RA C T E R I Z A T I O N
AVERAGE DRY WEATHER FLOW
MGD:
8.3
PEAK DRY WEATHER FLOW
MGD:
15.75
DESIGN FLOW
MGD:
6.3
INFLUENT BOD
MG/L:
235
INFLUENT TSS
MG/L:
220
INFLUENT VSS
(%):
88
TEMPERATURE
C:
20
TKN
MG/L:
35
ALKALINITY
MG/L:
250
PH
7.5
PO4-P
MG/L:
10
r
DEFAULT VALUE USED
PLANT C O N F I G U RATION
AND
DIMENSIONS
DESIGN AVERAGE DAILY FLOW
(MGD) .
-1
DESIGN PEAK WET WEATHER FLOW (MGD):
-1
Parsons
10 E-20
I•
I•
R 8 C
MANUFACTURER REX
TYPE MECHANICAL DRIVE
NUMBER OF PROCESS TRAINS 2
NUMBER OF STAGES PER TRAIN 2
STAGE M 1 SURFACE AREA (FT2): 865500
STAGE 0 2 SURFACE AREA (FT2): 865500
E-21
DATE: 07-27-1988
TIME: 03:45
Persons
i.
14
SECONDARY C L A R I V I C A T I O N
NUMBER OF RECTANGULAR CLARIFIERS: 4
DIMENSIONS EACH TOTAL
LENGTH (FT):140.0
WIDTH (FT): 20.0
DEPTH (FT): 10.00
WEIR LTH (FT): 40 160
SEC AREA (FT2): 2800 11200
TOTAL WEIR LENGTH (FT): 160
TOTAL SURFACE AREA (FT -2): 11200
S L U DG E H A N D L I N G
---------------
TYPE OF DIGESTION: ANAEROBIC
NUMBER OF PRIMARY DIGESTERS: 1
tt 1
VOLUME (GAL): 750000
DIGESTER HEATED Y
DIGESTER MIXED Y
NUMBER OF SECONDARY DIGESTERS: 1
VOLUME OF DIGESTERS N 1 (GAL): 200000
E-22
DATE: 07-27-1988
TIME: 03:45
Parsons
1!
io
E-23
Parsons
CAPISTRANO
VALLEY
WWA
DATE: 07-27-1988
TIME: 03:45
BOD: 235
TSS: 220
TEMP 20
SlECONDARY
SYSTEM
LOADINOB
****xxxxxx*************************x****xx*x****xxxx**x*******xxx***sxx*x
*
x
* *
* x
*
FLOW
*STAGE LOADING
*HYD LOAD*
CLAR. LOADINGS
* CLARIFIER *
*
MGD
*SBOD/1000
FT2
* GPDSF *SURFACE*
WEIR
* SOLIDS
* DETN. TIME *
*
*STAGE 1*
TOTAL* *
GPDSF x
GPD/FT
* A/SF/DAY
* HRS.
*
x x
* *
*
*
* *
x***xx**xx*xx***************xxx*xxxxxxxx************x*****x*x*x**********
4.73
4.76
2.38
1.36
422
29531
0.74
4.3
4.91
4.95
2.47
1.42
438
30687
0.76
4.1
5.09
5.13
2.56
1.47
454
31812
0.79
4.0
5.27
5.31
2.66
1.52
471
32937
0.82
3.8
5.45
5.49
2.75
1.57
487
34062
0.85
3.7
5.64
5.68
2.84
1.63
504
35250
0.88
3.6
5.82
5.86
2.93
1.68
520
36375
0.91
3.5
6.00
6.05
3.02
1.73
536
37500
0.93
3.4
6.18
6.23
3.11
1.79
552
38625
0.96
3.3
6.37
6.42
3.21
1.84
569
39812
0.99
3.2
6.55
6.60
3.30
1.89
585
40937
1.02
3.1
6.73
6.78
3.39
1.94
601
42062
1.05
3.0
6.91
6.96
3.48
2.00
617
43187
1.08
2.9
7.10
7.15
3.58
2.05
834
44375
1.11
2.8
7.28
7.34
3.67
2.10
650
45499
1.13
2.8
7.46
7.52
3.76
2.15
666
46625
1.16
2.7
7.64
7.70
3.85
2.21
682
47750
1.19
2.6
7.83
7.89
3.94
2.26
699
48937
1.22
2.6
8.01
8.07
4.04
2.31
715
50062
1.25
2.5
8.19
8.25
4.13
2.37
731
51187
1.28
2.5
E-23
Parsons
CAPISTRANO VALLEY NWA
DATE: 07-27-1988
TIME: 03:45
BOD: 235'
TSS: 220
TEMP 20
S E C O N D A R Y S Y S T E M P E R F O R M A N C E
* FLOW * EFF CONC. HG/L * SEC. SLUDGE PROD # TOTAL SLUDGE PROD
* NGD * BOD ■ SS * GBS TSS * LBS VSS* LBS TSS * GBS VSS * X SOL * GPD
4.73
20
19
4.91
21
20
5.09
21
21
5.27
22
22
SLUDGE PRODUCTION QUANTITIES NOT COMPUTED
5.45
23
22
5.64
24
23
5.82
24
24
6.00
25
24
6.18
26
25
6.37
26
26
6.55
27
26
6.73
28
27
6.91
28
28
7.10
29
29
7.28
30
29
7.46
30
30
7.64
31
31
7.83
32
31
8.01
32
32
8.19
33
33
Persons
' E-24
F w
W 0
Iao
WZa
ON
3M
QHp
azw
LWF
Da
NZD
Nom
wuh
U U
o a
a
a
A\.I
aA
lk
= iwn0
Wmz
minM
z
mlllln
nmoa
omAu
QMmm
m
W
OW
AM c
a
n
Rin
1
n
A eM
X6
pmp
M6m
ah �A
tS
OnOU
mawa
A
mLme
I
H
OW
AM c
a
RM�Om
ff hhF
ae
iRfi
■amR
tRIUnM
``00
RaP
tlln
A eM
V
=e
a0
I
I
° I
'
a
mA'
p IA0
ral
ane �,
Rat
enn Sao
a
Zpaee
a°
......
P 0
R W I
ars
I
�
Iia
�
'
Inn
I
I
a
° a Ima
Q
A 66
oa
•�
°i =_
me
�
m
n�
OW
AM c
E-25
r
m
a
RM�Om
ff hhF
�
iRfi
■amR
tRIUnM
``00
RaP
tlln
A eM
A C
E-25
r
m
r•
3 a r
9; ;11 all
s0 i a V
: i r w • •
w r w
E-26
•E
V
Wa
Y
i
$
�
ewe
Z3
w w .
Z
NO
•
d
H
LL
h
N C7
NO
Lu
O
u
E�
w
r
w w
w
G w w
\
r•
3 a r
9; ;11 all
s0 i a V
: i r w • •
w r w
E-26
•E
V
Y
i
$
�
ewe
w w .
Z
� w
•
d
•
•
•
f•
0
0
N
O
F
V
Q
F
W O
W u
N w�
Q
O .+
CD V
ti0y
N O "
N wy
WM
L)
O Q
a(
¢
W
w
e
p
'Y . w
i
L
if
hex:
i r
■ � ` � ■ ,■| � §
■|)! � | | |�
�■§§ . ��; `�|
E-2
I
]
|
�
1•
1•
1•
10
1�
16
PARSONS -
APPENDIX F
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARIES
The following cost estimate summaries were prepared on the CAPDET system
(Computer Assisted Procedure for the Design and Evaluation of wastewater
Treatment systems) as developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for the
Environmental Protection Agency.
The program has been deemed accurate to the extent that it is an acceptable
method for screening candidate processes for 201 planning efforts. Parsons
feels that it is a most appropriate method for this proposal, since all unit
quantity costs are uniform throughout all scenarios.
The cost evaluations do not include the influent pumping system or the
effluent transport system to the SERRA outfall. Since these costs will be a
common element for all systems, they are not required for process screening.
SYD/1682 F-1 080688
CAPISTRANO VALLEY WASTEWATER AUTHORITY
CAPDET ANALYSIS
CONVENTIONAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE
COST ESTIMATES ARE FROM PARAMETRIC EQUATIONS
DIRECT COSTS
Mobilization 297474 $
Clear & grub & and site pre 417602 $
Site electrical 843435 $
Control and instrument 430803 $
Yard piping 559817 $
Effluent pumping 270361 $
Lab & maint & admin bldg 739588 $
Profit/overhead 2424830
SUB TOTAL OTHER DIRECT 5983910 $ TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST 13446788 $
INDIRECT COSTS
Misc non const costs
OPER
MAINT
268935 $
201 planning
0 $
TOTAL
778728 $
CAPITAL
AMMORT
LABOR
LABOR
POWER
MATERIAL
CHEMICAL
0 & M
UNIT
COST
COST
COST
COST
COST
COST
COST
COST
$
$/yr
$/yr
$/yr
$/yr
$/yr
$/yr
$/yr
PRELIMIN*
352438
42752
14645
6545
3001
8810
0
33001
PRIM CLA
516485
62651
9375
4395
766
5164
0
19700
COMP MIX
1900624
231558
29801
14473
184334
41922
0
270530
A SEC CL
915722
111080
13130
6183
841
9157
0
29311
SLU PUMP
211675
26871
6193
4482
33954
1481
0
46110
CHLORINA
206378
26133
12618
2221
9597
7171
17617
49224
AIR FLOT
366041
45209
10179
2552
15723
3660
1977
34091
ANAE DIG
1164968
143681
19462
10897
12358
9268
0
51985
BELT FIL*
1460071
177112
57760
18944
19999
4000
10000
110703
POLY F/S
14239
1727
12038
0
0
284
0
12322
BLOWERS
354233
42969
0
0
0
0
0
0
SUB TOTAL
7462877
911747
185205
70697
280577
90922
29595
656977
COST ESTIMATES ARE FROM PARAMETRIC EQUATIONS
DIRECT COSTS
Mobilization 297474 $
Clear & grub & and site pre 417602 $
Site electrical 843435 $
Control and instrument 430803 $
Yard piping 559817 $
Effluent pumping 270361 $
Lab & maint & admin bldg 739588 $
Profit/overhead 2424830
SUB TOTAL OTHER DIRECT 5983910 $ TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST 13446788 $
INDIRECT COSTS
Misc non const costs
672339 $
Admin/legal
268935 $
201 planning
0 $
A/E design fee
778728 $
Inspection
268935 $
Contingencies
1075743 $
Technical costs
268935 $
SUB TOTAL (INDIRECT)
3333615 $
LAND COSTS 0 $
INTEREST DURING CONSTRUCTION 2013648 $
ADMINISTRATIVE COST 33902 $/yr
LABORATORY COST 40745 $/yr
TOTAL PROJECT COST 18794050 $
FINAL YEAR 0 & M 31647 $/yr
INITIAL YEAR 0 & M 31647 $/yr
Parsons
F-2
1•
1•
110
� ,9
r,
CAPISTRANO VALLEY WASTEWATER AUTHORITY
CAPDET ANALYSIS
CONVENTIONAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE
USER CHARGE SUMMARY
EPA grant
000E+00
%
State grant
000E+00
%
Allowance for financing
.300E+01
%
Bonds Percent Rate Life
Revenue 100.00 10.00 25
General obligation .00 .00 30
Other .00 .00 30
Number of billing units
.230E+07
$/T gal
Existing sewer rate
000E+00
Persons per household
.350E+01
Gallons/capita/day (water use)
100E+03
gal/cap-day
Current annual 0 & M cost
000E+00
$/year
Total project cost
.188E+08
$
EPA Eligible cost
.188E+08
$
Local share
.194E+08
$
Annual debt service
.213E+07
$/year
Principal and interest reserve
.305E+06
$/year
Contingency reserve
.305E+06
$/year
Total annual operating cost
.347E+07
$/year
Treatment cost
Cost per 1000 gallons treated (new system)
.151E+01
$/T gal
Cost per 1000 gallons treated (total system)
.151E+01
$/T gal
Cost per billing unit (new system)
.151E+01
$/T gal
Cost per billing unit (total system)
.151E+01
$/T gal
Cost per household (new system)
.159E+02
$/month
Cost per household (total system)
.159E+02
$/month
Parsons
I • F-3
•
CAPISTRANO VALLEY WASTEWATER AUTHORITY
CAPDET ANALYSIS
SEQUENTIAL BATCH REACTORS
COST ESTIMATES ARE FROM PARAMETRIC EQUATIONS
DIRECT COSTS
Mobilization 297474 $
Clear & grub & and site pre 417602 $
Site electrical 843435 $
Control and instrument 430803 $
Yard piping 559817 $
Effluent pumping 270361 $
Lab & maint & admin bldg 739588 $
Profit/overhead 1845669 $
SUB TOTAL (OTHER DIRECT) 5404749 $ TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST 10235077 $
INDIRECT COSTS
Misc non const costs
OPER
MAINT
204701 $
201 planning
0 $
TOTAL
603313 $
CAPITAL
AMMORT
LABOR
LABOR
POWER
MATERIAL
CHEMICAL
0 & M
UNIT
COST
COST
COST
COST
COST
COST
COST
COST
$
$/yr
$/yr
$/yr
$/yr
$/yr
$/yr
$/yr
PRELIMIN*
352438
42752
14645
6638
3001
8810
0
33094
SBR MECH.
1250000
155604
138488
2305
99999
2000
2000
244792
EQUALIZA
133622
16939
14260
12717
9403
770
0
37150
CHLORINA
205603
26039
12551
2231
9578
7161
17443
48964
SBR BASIN
396131
50975
14260
12717
37613
2391
0
66981
SBR BASIN
396131
50975
14260
12717
37613
2391
0
66981
SBR BASIN
396131
50975
14260
12717
37613
2391
0
66981
AERO DIG
240198
29826
8225
3416
10722
1461
0
23824
BELT FIL*
1460071
177112
57760
19214
19999
4000
10000
110973
SUB TOTAL
4830328
601200
288715
84677
265547
31376
29443
699740
COST ESTIMATES ARE FROM PARAMETRIC EQUATIONS
DIRECT COSTS
Mobilization 297474 $
Clear & grub & and site pre 417602 $
Site electrical 843435 $
Control and instrument 430803 $
Yard piping 559817 $
Effluent pumping 270361 $
Lab & maint & admin bldg 739588 $
Profit/overhead 1845669 $
SUB TOTAL (OTHER DIRECT) 5404749 $ TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST 10235077 $
INDIRECT COSTS
Misc non const costs
511753 $
Admin/legal
204701 $
201 planning
0 $
A/E design fee
603313 $
Inspection
204701 $
Contingencies
818806 $
Technical costs
204701 $
SUB TOTAL (INDIRECT)
2547975 $
LAND COSTS
INTEREST DURING CONSTRUCTION
ADMINISTRATIVE COST
LABORATORY COST
TOTAL PROJECT COST
FINAL YEAR 0 & M
INITIAL YEAR 0 & M
0 $
1533966 $
33902 $/yr
40745 $/yr
14317018 $
774409 $/yr
774409 $/yr
Parsons
1 • F-4
I
1
46
CAPISTRANO VALLEY WASTEWATER AUTHORITY
CAPDET ANALYSIS
SEQUENTIAL BATCH REACTORS
USER CHARGE SUMMARY
EPA grant
State grant
Allowance for financing
Bonds Percent Rate Life
Revenue 100.00 10.00 25
General obligation .00 .00 30
Other .00 .00 30
Number of billing units
Existing sewer rate
Persons per household
Gallons/capita/day (water use)
Current annual 0 & M cost
Total project cost
EPA Eligible cost
Local share
Annual debt service
Principal and interest reserve
Contingency reserve
Total annual operating cost
Treatment cost
Cost per 1000 gallons treated (new system)
Cost per 1000 gallons treated (total system)
Cost per billing unit (new system)
Cost per billing unit (total system)
Cost per household (new system)
Cost per household (total system)
F-5
000E+00 %
000E+00 %
300E+01 %
.230E+07
.000E+00
.350E+01
.100E+03
.000E+00
.143E+08
.143E+08
.147E+08
.162E+07
.232E+06
.232E+06
.286E+07
125E+01
125E+01
125E+01
125E+01
131E+02
131E+02
$/T gal
gal/cap-day
$/year
$/year
$/year
$/year
$/year
$/T gal
$/T gal
$/T gal
$/T gal
$/month
$/month
Parsons
•
I•
CAPISTRANO VALLEY WASTEWATER AUTHORITY
CAPDET ANALYSIS
BIOTOWER TREATMENT
;!TIJ
COST ESTIMATES ARE FROM PARAMETRIC EQUATIONS
DIRECT COSTS
Mobilization 297474 $
Clear & grub & and site pre 417602 $
Site electrical 843435 $
Control and instrument 430803 $
Yard piping 559817 $
Effluent pumping 270361 $
Lab & maint & admin bldg 739588 $
Profit/overhead 2190135 $
SUB TOTAL (OTHER DIRECT) 5749215 $ TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST 12145295 $
INDIRECT COSTS
Misc non const costs
OPER
MAINT
242905 $
201 planning
0 $
TOTAL
707775 $
CAPITAL
AMMORT
LABOR
LABOR
POWER
MATERIAL
CHEMICAL
0 & M
UNIT
COST
COST
COST
COST
COST
COST
COST
COST
$
$/yr
$/yr
$/yr
$/yr
$/yr
$/yr
$/yr
PRELIMIN*
352438
42752
14645
6406
3001
8810
0
32862
PRIM CLA
516485
62651
9358
4295
765
5164
0
19582
TRIC FIL
1856718
225226
4374
3158
0
11091
0
18623
T SEC CL
740308
89802
11744
5406
815
7403
0
25368
RCY PUMP
219821
27906
6120
4328
30965
1538
0
42951
CHLORINA
206145
26105
12598
2167
9592
7168
17565
49090
ANAE DIG
1044089
128838
17440
9496
10666
8504
0
46106
BELT FIL*
1460071
177112
57760
18543
19999
4000
10000
110302
SUB TOTAL
6396080
780394
134043
53803
75807
53681
27565
344884
COST ESTIMATES ARE FROM PARAMETRIC EQUATIONS
DIRECT COSTS
Mobilization 297474 $
Clear & grub & and site pre 417602 $
Site electrical 843435 $
Control and instrument 430803 $
Yard piping 559817 $
Effluent pumping 270361 $
Lab & maint & admin bldg 739588 $
Profit/overhead 2190135 $
SUB TOTAL (OTHER DIRECT) 5749215 $ TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST 12145295 $
INDIRECT COSTS
Misc non const costs
607264 $
Admin/legal
242905 $
201 planning
0 $
A/E design fee
707775 $
Inspection
242905 $
Contingencies
971623 $
Technical costs
242905 $
SUB TOTAL (INDIRECT)
3015377 $
LAND COSTS
INTEREST DURING CONSTRUCTION
ADMINISTRATIVE COST
LABORATORY COST
TOTAL PROJECT COST
FINAL YEAR 0 & M
INITIAL YEAR 0 & M
0$
1819280 $
33902 $/yr
40745 $/yr
16979952 $
419550 $/yr
419550 $/yr
F-6
Parsons
a
CAPISTRANO VALLEY WASTEWATER AUTHORITY
CAPDET ANALYSIS
BIOTOWER TREATMENT
USER CHARGE SUMMARY
EPA grant
000E+00
%
State grant
000E+00
%
Allowance for financing
.300E+01
%
Bonds Percent Rate Life
Revenue 100.00 10.00 25
General obligation .00 .00 30
Other .00 .00 30
Number of billing units
.230E+07
$/T gal
Existing sewer rate
000E+00
Persons per household
.350E+01
Gallons/capita/day (water use)
100E+03
gal/cap-day
Current annual 0 & M cost
000E+00
$/year
Total project cost
.170E+08
$
EPA Eligible cost
.170E+08
$
Local share
.175E+08
$
Annual debt service
.193E+07
$/year
Principal and interest reserve
.275E+06
$/year
Contingency reserve
.275E+06
$/year
Total annual operating cost
.290E+07
$/year
Treatment cost
Cost per 1000 gallons treated (new system)
.126E+01
$/T gal
Cost per 1000 gallons treated (total system)
.126E+01
$/T gal
Cost per billing unit (new system)
.126E+01
$/T gal
Cost per billing unit (total system)
.126E+01
$/T gal
Cost per household (new system)
.132E+02
$/month
Cost per household (total system)
.132E+02
$/month
Persons
1 • F-7
CAPISTRANO VALLEY WASTEWATER AUTHORITY
CAPDET ANALYSIS
SUBMERGED BIOLOGICAL CONTACTORS
•0, 11„1 t
COST ESTIMATES ARE FROM PARAMETRIC EQUATIONS
DIRECT COSTS
Mobilization 297474 $
Clear & grub & and site pre 417602 $
Site electrical 843435 $
Control and instrument 430803 $
Yard piping 559817 $
Effluent pumping 270361 $
Lab & maint & admin bldg 739588 $
Profit/overhead 2151067 $
SUB TOTAL (OTHER DIRECT) 5710147 $ TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST 11928647 $
INDIRECT COSTS
OPER
MAINT
$
Admin/legal
238572
TOTAL
201 planning
CAPITAL
AMMORT
LABOR
LABOR
POWER
MATERIAL
CHEMICAL
0 & M
UNIT
COST
COST
COST
COST
COST
COST
COST
COST
$
$/yr
$/yr
$/yr
$/yr
$/yr
$/yr
$/yr
PRELIMIN*
352438
42752
14645
6302
3001
8810
0
32758
RBC
2391142
342622
2635
5054
40646
34566
0
82901
R SEC CL
831222
100830
13052
5918
839
8312
0
28121
CHLORINA
205603
26039
12551
2118
9578
7161
17443
48851
ANAE DIG
978021
120799
11465
5990
6071
10815
0
34341
BELT FIL*
1460071
177112
57760
18241
19999
4000
10000
110000
SUB TOTAL
6218500
810156
112111
43625
80138
73666
27443
336972
COST ESTIMATES ARE FROM PARAMETRIC EQUATIONS
DIRECT COSTS
Mobilization 297474 $
Clear & grub & and site pre 417602 $
Site electrical 843435 $
Control and instrument 430803 $
Yard piping 559817 $
Effluent pumping 270361 $
Lab & maint & admin bldg 739588 $
Profit/overhead 2151067 $
SUB TOTAL (OTHER DIRECT) 5710147 $ TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST 11928647 $
INDIRECT COSTS
Misc non const costs
596432
$
Admin/legal
238572
$
201 planning
0
$
A/E design fee
695950
$
Inspection
238572
$
Contingencies
954291
$
Technical costs
238572
$
SUB TOTAL (INDIRECT)
2962389
$
LAND COSTS 0 $
INTEREST DURING CONSTRUCTION 1786924 $
ADMINISTRATIVE COST 33902 $/yr
LABORATORY COST 40745 -$/yr
TOTAL PROJECT COST 16677960 $
FINAL YEAR 0 & M 411633 $/yr
INITIAL YEAR 0 & M 411633 $/yr
Parsons
F-8
1•
10
10
I•
CAPISTRANO VALLEY WASTEWATER AUTHORITY
CAPDET ANALYSIS
SUBMERGED BIOLOGICAL CONTACTORS
USER CHARGE SUMMARY
EPA grant
000E+00
%
State grant
000E+00
%
Allowance for financing
.300E+01
%
Bonds Percent Rate Life
Revenue 100.00 10.00 25
General obligation .00 .00 30
Other .00 .00 30
Number of billing units
.230E+07
$/T gal
Existing sewer rate
000E+00
Persons per household
.350E+01
Gallons/capita/day (water use)
.100E+03
gal/cap-day
Current annual 0 & M cost
000E+00
$/year
Total project cost
.167E+08
$
EPA Eligible cost
.167E+08
$
Local share
.172E+08
$
Annual debt service
.189E+07
$/year
Principal and interest reserve
.270E+06
$/year
Contingency reserve
.270E+06
$/year
Total annual operating cost
.284E+07
$/year
Treatment cost
Cost per 1000 gallons treated (new system)
.124E+01
$/T gal
Cost per 1000 gallons treated (total system)
.124E+01
$/T gal
Cost per billing unit (new system)
.124E+01
$/T gal
Cost per billing unit (total system)
.124E+01
$/T gal
Cost per household (new system)
.130E+02
$/month
Cost per household (total system)
.130E+02
$/month
Parsons
10 F-9
M
•
APPENDIX G
LIFE CYCLE COST SUMMARIES
A simple 20 -year life cycle cost analysis was developed to farther screen the
candidate systems. The costs include a one-time capital expenditure for the
facilities, repair and replacement costs, and routine operation and
maintenance costs.
All costs are in 1988 dollars with no escalation. A 6.3-M%d flow is assumed
for each year over the 20 -year period.
•
The purpose of the following tables is to demonstrate that OEM costs are a
+ significant factor. The most significant sensitivity in this analysis is power
utilization. The San Diego Gas and Electric Schedule A-6 TOU was used in
estimating the cost.
1♦
SYD/1682
G-1
CeTRT-I
Parsons
C2
CAPISTRANO VALLEY WASTEWATER AUTHORITY
TWENTY YEAR LIFE CYCLE COSTS
BIO TOWER
W
COST S1P144RY <...
OPER.
IAINT.
TOTAL
TOTAL
CAPITAL
LABOR
LABOR
POWER
MATERIAL
CHEMICAL
WAEERATION
20 YEAR
!61ST
COST
COST
COST
COST
COST
M57
COST
COST
S
S/Yr
S/Yr
S/Yr
$/Yr
S/Yr
SHY
S/Yr
PRELIMINARY
5352,438
511,615
$6.406
S3,DO1
$8.810
$0
$72,862
$657,240
PRIMARY CLAR.
$516.485
$9,358
54.295
SM
$5,184
50
$19,582
5391,640
TRICKING FILTER
S1.B%.718
$4,374
$3,156
$D
$11.091
SO
518,623
$372,450
TOTAL SEC. CLARIFIER 5740,309
511.744
$5,408
5815
$7.403
SO
SM. 369
SUR, 360
NECYCLE rum
5219,821
$6.120
$4.329
$10,965
$1.578
$0
142.951
5859.020
CHLORINATION
5206.145
512,598
52,157
$9,592
$7,168
517.585
149.090
$981,800
ANAERDBIC DIGESTER
51,044,089
$17,440
$9,496
$10.666
$0.504
50
$46,106
$922,120
BELT FILTER PRESS
51.460.071
157.780
$18,543
$19.999
10.000
SID.Ow
5110,302
$2,206,040
OTHER DIRECT COSTS
. $5,749.215
SM TOTAL
$12.145.290
$134.039
553.799
3754»
357.176
527.56
______________
S344.BM
$6.897.680
'TOTAL 20 YEAR COST
=519.042.970
cimcrosn
BIOLUGZAL CONTAC7D i5
...>
COST 9"IARY <e.
OPER.
MINT.
TOTAL
TOTAL
CAPITAL
LABOR
LROUR
DOER
VWTERIAL
tHE ICILL
13PERATION
20 YEAR
UNIT
COST
EMT
COST
COST
COST
COST
LOST
COST
S
S/Yr
S/Yr
S/Yr
S/Yr
S/Yr
S/Yr
5/Yr
PRELIMINARY
$352,438
514.645
56.302
$7.001
$9.810
M
532.758w
$655.160
RBC
52.391,142
$2,635
SS.O54
$40.648
534.566
m
582,901
$1,658,020
R SECONDARY CLAR.
$831.222
113,052
56.918
1839
18.312
m
128.121
$562.420
MORINRTION
5205.607
$12,551
$2,118
$91578
17,M1
$17,443
548,851
S9T7,020
*AEROBIC DIGESTER
S978,021
111.46
55,990
$6,971
SID.815
50
534,341
5686,820
BELT FILTER PRESS
51.460,071
$57.790
118,241
519.998
344900
110.E
5110.000
52.200.000
OTHER DIRECT COSTS . 55.7110,147
SIH TOTAL
111.928.646
3112.1118
SO.=
380,134
573.964
321.443
3335.972
$6.739.440
Parsons
C2
m
SUB TOTAL $13,446,784 $185,201
TOTAL 20 YEAR COST .$26,586,324
TOTAL
OPER.
LABOR
CONST.
LABOR
UNIT
COST
COST
SYSTEM
Sf/yr
f/yr
---.-------- ---- --------
PRELIMINARY
�
$352,438
$14,645
PRIMARY CLAR.
$516,485
$9,375
COMP MI%
$1,900,624
$29,801
SECONDARY CLARIFIER
$915.722
$13,130
SLUDGE PUMP
$211.675
$6,193
CHLORINATION
(206,378
$12,518
AIR FLOTATION
366041
10179
ANAEROBIC DIGESTER
$1,164,968
$19,452
BELT FILTER PRESS
$1.460,071
(57,760
POLYMER F/S
14239
12038
BLOWERS
354233
0
OTHER DIRECT COSTS .
$5,983,910
(860,020
SUB TOTAL $13,446,784 $185,201
TOTAL 20 YEAR COST .$26,586,324
SUB TOTAL $10,235,074 $601,197
TOTAL 20 YEAR COST .$30,479,634
1•
CAPISTRANO VALLEY WASTEWATER AUTHORITY
TOTAL
OPER.
LABOR
CAPITAL
LABOR
UNIT
COST
COST
SYSTEM
S
f/yr
------------------------------------------
PRELIMINARY
$352,438
$42,752
OU!"Y
$1.250,000
$155,604
EQUALIZATION
$133,622
$16,939
CHLORINATION
$205,603
$26,039
EQUALIZATION
$396,131
$50.975
EQUALIZATION
$396,131
$50.975
EQUALIZATION
$396,131
$50,975
AEROBIC DIGESTER
$240,198
$291626
BELT FILTER PRESS
$1.460,071
$177,112
OTHER DIRECT COSTS
. $5,404,749
$/yr
SUB TOTAL $10,235,074 $601,197
TOTAL 20 YEAR COST .$30,479,634
1•
CAPISTRANO VALLEY WASTEWATER AUTHORITY
TOTAL
TOTAL
LABOR
TWENTY YEAR LIFE CYCLE COSTS
MATERIAL
COST
COST
ACTIVATED SLUDGE
SYSTEM
$/yr
$/yr
-----------------------------
$6.638
...>
COST SUMMARY <...
$2,305
$9919%
$2,000
MAIM.
$9,403
$770
$2,231
TOTAL
TOTAL
LABOR
POWER
MATERIAL
CHEMICAL
OPERATION
20 YEAR
COST
COST
COST
COST
C05T
COST
f/yr
f/yr
f/yr
f/yr
$/yr
$/yr
'----- ---------------
$6,545
53.OD1
---------------------------------
$8,810
$0
&33,001
(860,020
$4,395
$766
$51164
60
$19,700
$394,000
$14,473
$184,334
$41,922
$0
$270,530
$5,410,600
$6,183
$841
$9,157
$0
$29,311
$586,220
$4,482
(33,954
$1,481
60
$46,110
$922,2DD
$2,221
$9,597
$7,171
$17,617
$49.224
$9B4,480
2552
15723
3860
1977
$34.091
$681,820
$10,897
$12,358
$9,256
$0
$51.905
$1.039,700
$18,944
$191999
$4.000
$10,000
$110,703
$2.214,050
'0
0
264
0
$12,322
$246,440
0
0
0
0
f0
f0
_ __________________________________-_______-__-________,
$70,692
$280,573
$90,917
$29,594
$656,977 $13.139,540
SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR
...> COST SUMMARY <...
MAINT.
TOTAL
TOTAL
LABOR
POWER
MATERIAL
COST
COST
COST
$/yr
$/yr
$/yr
-----------------------------
$6.638
(3,001
$6,610
$2,305
$9919%
$2,000
$12,717
$9,403
$770
$2,231
$9,576
$7,161
$12,717
$37,613
$2,391
$12,717
$37.613
$2.391
$12.717
$37,613
$2,391
$3.416
$10,722
$1,461
$19,214
$19.999
$4.000
$84,672 $265.541 $31.375 $29,443 $1.012.228 $20.244.560
G-3
Parsons
TOTAL
TOTAL
CHEMICAL
OPERATION
20 YEAR
COST
COST
COST
$/yr
f/yr
f/yr
$0
661.201
$1,224,020
$2,000
$261,908
$5,238,160
SO
$39,829
$796,580
$17,443
$62,452
$1,249,040
$0
$103,186
$2,073.920
0
$ID3,695
$2,073,920
$0
$103,696
$2,073.920
60
$45.425
$908,500
610,000
$230.325
(4,606,500
$84,672 $265.541 $31.375 $29,443 $1.012.228 $20.244.560
G-3
Parsons
PARSONS -
APPENDIX H
SPECIMEN CONTRACTS
Included herein are specimen contracts fbr engineering services and O&M
services.
I•
t
I
SYD/1682
H-1
is
�•
I6
�0
00
i1
SPECIMEN
MASTER AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
THIS MASTER AGREEMENT is made and entered into on 19
by and between ,
hereinafter referred to as Agency-, and Parsons (or
Subsidiary), hereafter called "Engineer-, as follows:
RECITALS
1. Agency contemplates proceeding with a project which is titled
for
hereinafter called "PROJECT".
County,
2. Engineer prepared and submitted to Agency a Report
titled, hereinafter
called "REPORT".
3. PROJECT may be described as a management
system consisting -of
4. PROJECT is located in
3" Engineer has represented to Agency that it has available
adequate personnel who are well qualified by•Teason of educa-
tion and experience to perform the necessary engineering ser-
vices required for such a project and to generally assist
Agency in Projert iaplementation.
FOR, THEREFORE, TT IS NDTDALLT AGREED AND UNDERSTOOD between the
parties, as follows:
-1-
W I T N E S S E T H
SECTION I: EMPLOYMENT
Agency hereby employs Engineer, as an Independent contractor, to
furnish the engineering services covered by this Master Agreement upon
the terms and conditions set forth below, and Engineer hereby accepts
such employment.
SECTION II: SCOPE OF PROJECT
The scope of the Project for which Engineer shall furnish and
Perform the services required under this Master Agreement 1s generally
described as the
consisting of
SECTION III: 'PROJECT ASSIGNMENTS
It is the Intent of Agency and Engineer to develop separate amend-
ments to this Master Agreement for each specific project assignment and,
as required, to direct Engineer to undertake the services set forth in
Section IV hereof. Such amendments shall be called Project Assignments
and shall be numbered consecutively. Such amendments, upon acceptance
by Engineer and by Agency shall become and be considered as part of this
Master Agreement, and i71 provisions herein shall apply to such Project
Assignments.
A. General In connection with the related facilities to be con-
structed for the scope of project, described in Section II, Engineer
shall perform prime, professional consulting engineering services for
Step 2, Design Work and Step 3, Construction Work.
B. Step 2 Design Services shall consist, in general, of the f02-
low1ng:
-2-
I•
1. Preparation of preliminary engineering evaluations and
designs;
2. Preparation of basis of design report(s), including de-
tailed design criteria, schematic drawings of all system
components, preliminary layouts and site plans, lists of
materials and equipment, and cost estimates;
3.
Preparation of detailed plans, specifications and contract
documents for construction of the Project;
4.
Preparation of draft operation and maintenance manual(s) in
conformance with the guidelines and requirements of grant
funding agencies;
5.
Assist Agency in obtaihing and analyzing bids for construc-
w
tion and in awarding contracts;
6.
Performance of additional design or evaluation work as
directed by Agency.
C. Step 3 Construction Services shall consist, in general, of the
following:
°
1.
Provide resident engineering services as required to per-
form technical observation of construction of the Project;
2.
Provide assistance to Agency in the administration of con-
struction contracts;
3.
Check detailed construction drawings and shop and erection
drawing submitted by contractor(s) for compliance with
plans and specifications;
4.
Prepare final operation and maintenance manual(s) in con-
formance with the guidelines and requirements of grant
funding agencies;
5.
Provide assistance to Agency in the start-up and routine
operations of facilities constructed for the Project;
6.
Prepare record drawings of the Project after completion of
'
construction; and
7.
Performance of additional construction services as directed
by Agency.
'
D. Specialized Services for Design and Construction shall consist,
in general,
of the following:
1
1.
Furnish field and aerial surveys and photogrammetry for
design and staking for construction;
4
v
L
-3-
•
2. Furnish soils and geotechnical investigations for design
and soil testing for construction;
• 3. Print plans and specifications for bidding and construction
purposes;
4. Conduct archaeological field studies and mitigation work as
i required to fulfill the requirements of grant funding
agencies;
5. Furnish wastewater sampling and analyses as required, for
design, facility startup and operations evaluations;
6. Conduct value engineering analyses in accordance with the
regulations and guidelines of grant funding agencies;
•
7. Assist Agency in developing its revenue program and financ-
ing plan;
S. Assist Agency in meeting specific federal and state statu-
tory requirements such as public hearings and other activi-
ties related to user charge studies;
9. Provide other specialized services as required by Agency
for implementation of the Project.
j E. Supplemental Services for Design and Construction shall
consist, in general, of the following:
1. Furnish field surveys for preparation of easement docu-
ments;
2. Prepare plats and descriptions of easements necessary for
construction of the Project;
3. Assist Agency in preparing and processing documents neces-
sary for securing easements, rights-of-way, permits and
licenses from public and private agencies to allow for the
construction, operation and maintenance of the Project;
4. Assist Agency in its annexation proceedings;
5. Assist Agency and its consultants in the -issuance, elet-
tion(s) and sale(s) of bonds to finance the Project;
6. Assist Agency in the preparation of applications and sup-
porting documents for federal and state grants, in connec-
tion with the Project; and
7. Attendance at meetings, hearings, and/or conferences in
connection with all of the above listed services.
=5
�•
SECTION V: TIME OF PERFOR'-UNCE
A. General
Specific completion periods shall be specified for each specific
Project Assignment to this Master Agreement in accordance with the
mutual concurrence of the Agency and Engineer.
E. Delays
Should there be delays, as cited below under Force Majeure, which
result in increased costs to Engineer, the time of performance shall be
• extended by a reasonable amount to account for the delay and the total
i compensation due Engineer, as described in Project Assignments to this
Master Agreement, shall be adjusted accordingly.
C. Subcontracted Services
For subcontracted services, Engineer shall contract for and
schedule such services in a timely fashion in accordance with the re-
quirements of the work.
ie D. Extensions of Time
Completion dates established for a particular Project Assignment
may be extended anytime prior to completion of the work by mutual agree-
ment in writing between Agency and Engineer.
E. Force Majeure
As herein used, the term "Force Majeure" means war, mobilization,
revolution, civil commotion, riots, strikes, lockouts, floods, hurri-
canes, similar storms or other actions of the elements, acts of God or
the public enemy, restrictions or restraints imposed by law or by rule,
regulation or order of governmental authorities ,vhether federal, state
or local, and whether civil or military, acts of civil or military
authorities, interruption of transportation facilities, failure of sup-
pliers or subcontractors to complete work as promised, and any other
cause which is beyond the reasonable control of the party affected and
which, by excercise of reasonable diligence, such Party is unable to
prevent. No such suspension, however, shall suspend, alter, or affect
Engineer's right to receive payments of costs.
-5-
No
No
■•
SECTION VI: COMPENSATION
A. General
Agency and Engineer shall negotiate a fee for each specific Project
Assignment. The method of payment of said fee shall be on a,lump sum
basis, on a cost -plus -a -fixed -fee basis, or on a time -and -expense basis.
The method of payment shall depend on funding agency requirements and on
the specific conditions, the scope of work and the scope of services for
each specific Project Assignment. Engineer shall complete Form
with appropriate attachments for each specific Project Assignment and
said form shall be incorporated into the Project Assignment to which it
pertains.
B. Lump Sum Payment Method
Agency may elect to pay Engineer a total lump sum fee amount to be
determined for each specific Project Assignment.
C. Cost -Plus -A -Fixed -Fee Payment Method
Agency may elect to pay Engineer on a cost -plus -fixed -fee basis
which shall be the sum of (1) Direct Salaries, (2) Overhead Cost, (3)
Direct Non -Salary Expenses, and (4) a Fixed Fee.
I. Direct Salaries shall be the amount paid by Engineer to its
employees for time directly chargeable to each Project Assign-
ment, exclusive of costs for fringe benefits for said employees
and other payroll costs not paid to the employee.
2. Overhead Cost shall be a percentage of the Direct Salaries.
For the purpose of billing, Engineer's Overhead Percentage
shall be the most current provisional indirect cost rate and
• shall be changed from time to time to reflect any revision of
said provisional indirect cost rate. A provisional indirect
cost rate shall be established for each specific Project
Assignment. For the purpose of final payment, Engineer's Over-
head Cost will be adjusted using Engineer's final indirect cost
rate, as determined by government audit for the period during
• which the work of the specific Project Assignment was con-
ducted.
3. Direct Non -Salary Expenses shall be all identifiable costs
directly chargeable to each Project Assignment including, but
not limited to: travel and subsistence expenses; work subcon-
• tracted to others; reproduction of plans, specifications, re-
ports and other documents; equipment rental; and, drafting and
-6-
•
For tasks for which the scope of work is not readily define -
able, Agency may elect to pay engineer on a time -and -expense
basis in accordance with the most current Standard Schedule of
Compensation established by Engineer. Cost and profit included
in the rates of the most current said schedule will be specif-
ically negotiated and displayed separately in each specific
-7-
stenographic supplies used in the work. Rates for automobile
mileage shall be established for each Project Assignment.
4. Fixed Fee shall be a fixed amount for interest on invested
capital, readiness to serve and profit. A fixed fee shall be
established for each specific Project Assignment.
5. Total Estimated Cost is the sum of categories (1), (2), and (3)
above.
•
f
6. Total Price Ceiling is the sum of categories (1), (2), (3) and
(1
(4) above.
7. Invoices shall include the costs incurred in categories (1),
(2), and (3), plus a proportionate amount of the category (4)
Fixed Fee.
8. Projected Cost Overruns. If, at any time in the performance of
the work for a specific Project Assignment (under a cost -plus -
fixed -fee basis), Engineer has reason to believe that the costs
which it expects to incur during any succeeding sixty (60) day
`
period, when added to all costs previously incurred, will ex-
ceed seventy-five percent (75x) of the Total Estimated Cost
then allotted to said specific Project Assignment, Engineer
shall notify Agency in writing to that effect. The notice
shall state the estimated amount of additional funds required
to continue performance for the period specified in said
specific Project Assignment to this Master Agreement. Sixty
(60) days prior to the end of the period specified, Engineer
will advise Agency in writing as to the estimated amount of
additional funds, if any, that will be required for the timely
performance of the work under the specific Project Assignment
or for such further period as otherwise mutually agreed.to by
Agency and Engineer. If, after such notification, additional
funds are not allotted by the end of the period specified or an
agreed date substituted therefor, Agency will, if required in
writing by Engineer, terminate the particular Project Assign-
ment to this Master Agreement pursuant to the provisions in
Section VII, Termination. If Engineer, in the exercise of its
reasonable judgment, estimates that the funds available will
allow it to continue to discharge its obligations under said
particular Project Assignment for a period extending beyond
such date, it shall specify the later day in 'its request, and
Agency, as its discretion, may terminate said particular
Project Assignment on that later date.
D. Time and Expense
For tasks for which the scope of work is not readily define -
able, Agency may elect to pay engineer on a time -and -expense
basis in accordance with the most current Standard Schedule of
Compensation established by Engineer. Cost and profit included
in the rates of the most current said schedule will be specif-
ically negotiated and displayed separately in each specific
-7-
Project Assignment. A total price ceiling, which may not be
exceeded without Agency's prior written approval, will be
established for each specific Project Assignment.
E. Terms of Payment. Engineer shall invoice Agency monthly for
work completed during the previous month. All invoices are due
and payable within 30 days of receipt by Agency.
SECTION VII: TERMINATION
Notwithstanding the above, Agency reserves the right to terminate
any Project Assignment to this Master Agreement at any time prior to the
completion of the services to be furnished by Engineer under said
Project Assignment by giving written notice of termination to Engineer,
in which event Agency shall pay Engineer only for work done by Engineer
under said Project Assignment prior to receipt of such notice of termi-
nation. If any Project Assignment to this Master Agreement is termi-
nated and the work thereof is completed by others, Engineer shall be
relieved of all responsibility for completion. Termination of a partic-
ular Project Assignment does not affect any other operative Project
Assignment.
SECTION VIII: AGENCY LIABILITY
Engineer understands that this Master Agreement is with the Agency
alone, and that none of the members of the Agency are liable for the
sums which may be payable hereunder or for any debts of Agency. 'It is
understood and agreed, however, that Agency intends to pay Engineer for
Its services hereunder from funds to be derived from any or all of the
following sources: state grant or other loan funds, federal grant or
other loan funds, transfer of revenue from the ,
and local sources of the Agency and its members.
II- SECTION IR: CHANGES
In the event that Agency should revise, correct, or modify the
scope of project, as described under Section II of this Master Agreement
and Project Assignment thereto, during Performance hereunder, Engineer
shall comply with such revisions, corrections, or modifications. Should
said changes result in an increase or decrease in costs to Engineer,
-8-
these costs shall be evaluated by Agency and Engineer for negotiation as
to adjustment in the compensation due Engineer.
SECTION R: DUTIES OF AGENCY
Agency agrees to perform duties in connection with this Master
Agreement and Project Assignments thereto as follows:
A. To make all provisions for Engineer to enter upon the sites of
the Project as required for Engineer to Perform work necessary to the
development of the Project;
B. To hold promptly all required hearings and meetings; to serve
applications and required notices; to receive and act upon all protests;
and to fulfill all legal and financial requirements necessary to the de-
velopment of the Project; including securing all necessary lands,
rights-of-way, and permits;
C. To assist Engineer in obtaining any available information con-
cerning location and details of facilities under control of members of
the Agency that may affect the design or construction of the Project,
and to render reasonable assistance to Engineer;
D. To advertise for bids for construction of the work without
undue delay, and to administer the bidding and contract award pro-
cedures;
E. To examine within a reasonable time so as not to delay the ser-
vice of Engineer, all studies, reports, sketches, drawings, specifica-
tions, cost estimates, proposals and other documents presented by
Engineer;
F. To give prompt written notice to Engineer whenever Agency
observes or otherwise becomes aware of any delect in the Project; and
G. To furnish approvals and permits from all governmental author-
ities having jurisdiction over the Project and such approvals and con-
sents from others as may be necessary for completion of the Project.
SECTION XI: DATA FURNISHED BY AGENCY
For the purpose of aiding Engineer in the performance of its obli-
gations under this Master Agreement and Project Assignments thereto,
Agency shall furnish Engineer all relevant data in its possession and
shall direct its officers, agents, member entities and employees to
render all reasonable assistance to Engineer in connection with its per-
formance hereunder. Engineer shall have no liability for defects in
work performed by it and attributable to Engineer's reliance upon or use
of data furnished by Agency and Agency agrees to indemnify and hold
Engineer harmless from any and all claims and judgments, and all losses,
costs and expenses arising therefrom. Engineer shall disclose to
Agency, prior to use thereof, defects or omissions in the data furnished
by Agency to Engineer that Engineer may reasonably discover in its re-
view and inspection thereof.
SECTION XII: AMENDMENTS
Agency hereby reserves the right to amend the provisions of this
Master Agreement from time to time as may be in the best interest of
Agency and as may be required by grant funding agencies. Such amend-
ments, upon acceptance by Engineer and by Agency shall become and be
considered as part of this Master Agreement, and all provisions herein
shall apply to such amendments.
SECTION XIII: SUBCONTRACT
The Agency has entered into this Master Agreement in order to re-
ceive the professional services of Engineer. Engineer will therefore
not make an assignment to a third party of all or any portion of the
services required of Engineer under this Master Agreement and Project
Assignments thereto without first obtaining the written consent of
Agency, except Engineer may make use of the part-time assistance of
other experts possessing unique skills, the utiliza-tion of which will
in the opinion of Engineer enhance the quality of its service to Agency
under this Master Agreement and Project Assignments thereto, provided,
however, that any such additional assistants, part-time or otherwise,
-10-
shall be considered employees of Engineer and the responsibility for
same shall rest with Engineer.
SECTION XIV: INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
Engineer shall perform the services hereunder as an independent
contractor, and nothing herein contained shall be construed to be incon-
sistent with this relationship or status. The employees of Engineer
shall not be deemed to be the employees of Agency and Agency shall have
no right to control the physical conduct of Engineer's employees.
Ie SECTION XV: REUSE OF DOCUMENTS
All documents including drawings and specifications furnished by
y Engineer pursuant to this Master Agreement and Project Assignments
thereto are instruments of its service in respect of the Project. They
are not intended or represented to be suitable for reuse by Agency or
jothers on extensions of the Project or on any other project. Any reuse
without specific written verification or adaptation by Engineer will be
at Agency's sole risk and without liability or legal exposure to Engi-
neer, and Agency shall indemnify and hold harmless Engineer from all
claims, damages, losses and expenses including attorneys fees arising
out of or resulting therefrom. Any such verification or adaptation will
entitle Engineer to further compensation at rates to be mutually agreed
upon by Agency and Engineer.
SECTION XVI: ESTIMATES OF COST
Since Engineer has no control over costs of labor, materials or
equipment, or over contractor(s)' methods of determining prices, or over
competitive bidding or market conditions, Engineer's opinions of
probable Project Cost or Construction Cost provided for herein are to be
made on the basis of Engineer's experience and qualifications and repre-
sent Engineer's best judgment as design professionals familiar with the
construction industry, but Engineer cannot and does not guarantee that
j proposals, bids, or construction costs will not vary from opinions of
j� probable cost prepared by Engineer.
-11-
SECTION XVII: ENGINEER'S RESPONSIBILITY RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION
Engineer shall use reasonable care in its endeavor to provide pro-
tection for Agency against defects and deficiencies in work done by con-
tractor(s), but Engineer has no responsibility for construction means,
methods, techniques, sequences or procedures or for safety precautions
or programs, or for contractor(s)' failure to perform construction work
in accordance with contract documents. If, in performance of its duties
hereunder, Engineer observes that contractor(s) are not performing work
In accordance with contract documents, Engineer will promptly and fully
report the matter to Agency.
Engineer shall use reasonable care in its examination of requests
for payments of contractor(s) under its (their) contract(s) with Agency,
in accordance with prevailing custom, to ascertain whether work has been
done in the manner required and whether payments are due under such con-
tract(s).
SECTION XVIII: FEDERAL PROVISIONS
Required Provisions Consulting Engineering Agreements, 40 CFR Part
35, Sub Part E, as published in the Federal Register on ,
is incorporated by this reference in this Master Agreement and Project
Assignments hereto.
SECTION XIX: SCOPE OF AGREEMENT
This Master Agreement and incorporated attachments constitutes the
entire agreement between the parties relative to the subject matters
hereof, and no modification thereof shall be eflective unless and until
such modification is evidenced by a writing signed by both parties to
this Master Agreement. There are no understandings, agreements, condi-
tions, representations, warranties, or Promises with respect to the sub-
ject matter of this contract, except those expressly contained in this
writing.
-12-
L
1*
I•
1•
6•
140
SECTION XX: SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGN
This Master Agreement and Project Assignments thereto shall be
binding upon and inure to the benefit of any successors and assigns of
the respective parties hereto.
SECTION XXI: ATTORNEY'S FEES
If any legal action is necessary to enforce or interpret the terms
or provisions of this Master Agreement and Project Assignments thereto,
and the respective rights and duties of the parties hereunder, the pre-
vailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees in addi-
tion to any other relief to which he may be entitled.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Master
Agreement as of the date hereinabove written.
By
(CLIENT)
140
I*
1•
By
1* -13-
SPECIM
OPERATIONS AN
CONI
Bet
PARSONS MUNICIF
a
PARSONS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
for
AGENCY
THIS AGREEMENT, dated as of , 1987 between Parsons Municipal Services,
Inc., (the "Service Provider") an Corporation and Parsons
Environmental Services, Inc., (the "Contractor") a California Corporation
qualified to do business in
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Service Provider possesses the wastewater facility
which is located at the place or places and consists of the facilities
described in Exhibit "A" (the "Facility");
WHEREAS, the Contractor has the experience, qualifications and
personnel to operate the Facility; and
WHEREAS, the Service Provider has entered into a Wastewater
Service Contract (the "Service Agreement") with (the "Service Recipient")
under the terms of which the Service Provider agreed to design, construct,
possess, operate and maintain the Facility in accordance with the specific
terms of the Service Agreement, including the specific terms as to the quality
and quantities of effluent discharged from the Facility and the uses to which
such effluent would be put set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. EMPLOYMENT OF CONTRACTOR
1.01. Employment of Contractor.
The Service Provider hereby employs the Contractor to
furnish the services hereinafter described, at and for the compensation herein
stated, and the Contractor hereby agrees diligently to perform all such
services in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and for the
compensation provided herein. Wherein this. Agreement it expressly states
obligations of the Service Recipient to the Contractor, it is understood and
agreed that the Service Provider shall be responsible to cause the Service
Recipient to comply. Where the Service Agreement expressly states obligations
of the Contractor to the Service Recipient, it is understood and agreed that
such obligations are to be complied with on behalf of Service Provider.
SECTION 2. TERM
2.01. Term.
The term of this Agreement shall be for an Initial Term
of approximately _ months, beginning on , and ending
Qn , and for successive renewal terms (each a "Renewal Term") of
years each, beginning on the day following the Initial Term or the last
Renewal Term, as the case may be, and ending the specified number of years
later, each Renewal Term to be elected by the Service Recipient in the manner
set forth at section 2.02 hereof.
LGL/BHC -1- 012288
Agmt
2.02. Automatic Renewal.
The Service Recipient shall be deemed to have elected a
Renewal Term unless the Service Recipient delivers, at least 90 days prior to
the last day of the preceding Renewal Term, or 30 days prior to the last day
of the Initial Term, as the case may be, a notice that it elects not to renew
this Agreement.
SECTION 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES
3.01. Operation.
(a) The Contractor shall provide all the labor and
services needed to operate and to maintain, and shall operate and maintain,
the Facility during the Initial Term and each Renewal Term so that effluent
discharged from the Facility meets the effluent requirements set forth in
Appendix 1, provided that the quality of influent delivered to the Facility
meets the influent requirements specified in Appendix 1. The Contractor shall
redeliver to the Service Recipient at its designated transmission line,
treated effluent in such quantities as are commensurate with the quantities of
wastewater received by the Facility. The Contractor shall conduct a sampling
program adequate for process control and which will meet all applicable
regulatory requirements and shall convey the treated effluent from the
Facility to the Service Recipient's disposal site or distribution point,
provided Service Recipient (i) provides a transmission line or lines capable
of making such delivery connected to the Facility (or separately contracts
with Contractor with regard to the construction and installation thereof) and
(ii) has received a license to discharge treated effluent on such site from
all appropriate regulatory agencies. The Contractor shall comply in all
respects with the Operations and Maintenance Manual (the "ODM Manual")
pertaining to the Facility, except to the extent the ODM Manual is contrary to
any then applicable federal, state or local law or regulation, in which case
the Contractor shall comply with such law or regulation, to the extent the
design capability of the Facility permits.
3.02. Staffing.
(a) In connection with its operation of the Facility as
described at section 3.01(a) above, the Contractor shall staff the Facility
hours per day, days per week throughout the Initial Term.
(b) The Contractor may provide other staffing with
respect to line maintenance and routine services as is shown on the Initial
Budget if requested by the Service Party. The Contractor shall provide, upon
the written request of the Service Recipient, additional staffing on a regular
basis in accordance with the Service Recipient written request, subject,
however, to appropriate revision in the Target Fee to reflect such additional
services.
(c) The Contractor shall provide such additional
staffing as may be necessary to complete the services described at section
3.01(a) and (b) hereof in a workmanlike and professional basis and to maintain
the discharge standards set forth herein.
LGL/BHC -2- 012288
Agmt
1•
16
1•
it
13
.0
I•
16
3.03. Grounds.
The Contractor shall at all times maintain the grounds
of the Facility, including the landscaping, in an aesthetically appropriate
and tidy condition.
3.04. Relief of Obligations.
The Contractor shall be relieved of its obligation to
process and discharge effluent to meet the standards specified in Appendix 1
In the event the Facility (1) suffers a Shutdown (as defined at section 3.05
below) or (ii) receives influent 4&lch fails to met .the standards specified
In Appendix 1 In a manner which interferes materially with the Facility's
ability to meet the effluent standards specified in Appendix 1. Nothing herein
shall relieve the Contractor of its duty to accept Influent at the Facility
and to operate the Facility to process such Influent to the best of its
ability to do so.
3.05. Shutdown.
"Shutdown" is the cessation of operations at the
Facility due to a failure of operating equipment or interruption of the
processes of the Facility for reasons other than the negligence or misconduct
of the Contractor or its employees, agents or subcontractors. The status of
Shutdown shall terminate (i) upon correction of the cause thereof, so long as
the Contractor pursues such correction in good faith as rapidly as possible
under the circumstances consistent with good operating practices, or (ii) upon
the failure of the Contractor so to pursue such a correction. upon
termination of Shutdown status, the Contractor no longer shall be relieved
under section 3.04 of its obligations to process and discharge effluent to
meet the effluent standards specified In Appendix 1. Correcting the cause of a
shutdown which includes a destruction of a substantial portion of any living
organisms used in the wastewater treatment process shall include a reasonable
time within which to reestablish the organisms at a level sufficient to treat
Influent in the quantities generated by the Service Recipient's customers.
SECTION A. STANDARD AND WARRANTY
4.01. Standard of Performance.
The Contractor shall perform all services under this
Agreement in accordance with generally accepted practices and procedures for
the proper operation and maintenance of wastewater treatment facilities such
as the Facility and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local
laws, regulations and standards.
4.02_ Warranty.
The Contractor warrants that during
each Renewal Term hereof the effluent discharged from the
the effluent discharge requirements specified in Appendix
I ua./iC -3-
Agmt
the Initial Term and
Facility shall meet
1 provided that the
influent delivered to the Facility meets the requirements specified in
Appendix 1 for influents, as determined by the
SECTION 5. PERMITS
5.01. Contractor to Obtain Permits.
The Contractor shall obtain or maintain all permits or
licenses which are required, customary or appropriate in connection with the
performance of its services under this Agreement. The Service Provider and
Service Recipient shall cooperate and assist the Contractor as reasonably
required to submit applications for such permits and licenses or shall obtain
them in the Service Provider's name (or the name of the Service Recipient) and
provide Contractor with evidence reasonably satisfactory to Contractor that
(i) such permits or licenses have been issued and (ii) cover operation of the
Facility by Contractor.
5.02. Service Provider's Assignment.
The Service Provider shall and hereby does assign to
Contractor all manufacturers' and vendors' warranties on the material and
equipment installed in the Facility. If assignment of any warranty would
breach the terms thereof, then the Service Provider hereby appoints the
Contractor as its agent to make claim on and under each such warranty. The
Contractor shall take all reasonable steps to enforce such warranties as
remain in force.
SECTION 6. PERSONNEL
6.01. Personnel.
The Contractor shall provide competent, experienced and
qualified personnel to perform services in connection with this Agreement.
The personnel to be provided by the Contractor are identified by job
descriptions in Appendix 2.
.SECTION 7. INSPECTIONS, REPORTS AND REVIEW OF B006S AND RECORDS
7.01. Access to Facility.
The Service Recipient and Service Provider shall have
full and unrestricted access to all parts of the Facility and the System at
all reasonable times to review the performance of the Contractor and to
Inspect the condition of the Facility. Except in the event of emergencies,
the Service Recipient shall exercise its right of access either (1) during the
hours referred to at section 3.02(a) hereof or (ii) with reasonable notice to
Contractor to permit it to provide access and staff during such inspection.
7.02. Performance Reports.
The Contractor shall provide to Service Recipient each
month a report describing the Facility's performance for the preceding month,
LGL/BHC -4- 012288
Agmt
1•
1•
1•
I.•
1•
1•
including without limitation, the average influent and effluent quality and
quantity measurements, a description of all repairs made and of all items
replaced during the period covered by the report.
7.03. Books and Records Reviews.
The Contractor shall make its books and records
pertaining to it performance under this Agreement available for inspection and
copying by the Service Recipient upon reasonable notice during normal business
hours.
SECTION 8. REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT
8.01. Repairs and Replacement.
The Contractor shall maintain the Facility in good
operating condition and repair throughout the term of this Contract. If at
any time or from time to time it becomes necessary to incur repair or
replacement expense (including labor costs) with respect to any single item or
function in an amount greater than $500, and if such repair or replacement
expense was not included in the Target Fee for such fiscal year, the cost of
such item shall be reimbursed to the Contractor.
8.02. Notice to Service Recipient.
The Contractor, before repairing or replacing or
agreeing to repair or replace any materials, parts or equipment which is any
part of the Facility and which would be paid for in accordance with section
8.01 hereof, shall notify the Service Recipient of its intent to repair or
replace equipment, the circumstances thereof and its estimate of the costs to
be incurred. Except in the case of emergencies threatening the immediate
shutdown or substantial reduction in productive capacity of the Facility
(solely for the purposes of this section 8, an "Emergency"), such notice shall
be given at least 30 days in advance of the date the Contractor intends so to
repair or replace materials, parts or equipment. Unless the Service Recipient
disputes the need for such repair or replacement, the Contractor shall be paid
the amount of its estimate or, pursuant to section 8.01, the Contractor's
actual costs. If the Service Recipient, within the 30 day period following
the giving of such notice, shall notify the Contractor that it disputes the
need to replace the materials, parts or equipment, the Contractor shall
refrain from repairing, replacing or agreeing to repair or replace the
materials, parts or equipment pending the resolution of the dispute in
accordance with this Agreement, unless, during the pendency of the dispute,
further delay in repair or replacement creates an Emergency. If the
Contractor in good faith determines an Emergency to exist, the Contractor
shall be reimbursed for the cost of repair or replacement of the materials,
parts or equipment as set forth at section 8.01 above pending resolution of
the dispute. The Contractor shall reimburse the Service Recipient for the
cost of unnecessary replacements in the manner and at the times and amounts
determined in accordance with applicable law and shall refund any unused
portion of an estimated payment upon completion of the work.
LGL/BHC -5- 012288
Agmt
8.03. Relief of Contractor's Obligations.
If the Contractor is unable to make needed repair or
replacement as a result of the Service Recipient's failure to pay therefor, it
shall be relieved of its responsibilities under sections 3.01, 4.01 and 4.02
hereof to the extent any departure from the standards set forth therein is
caused by such failure to repair or replace.
SECTION 9. OPERATING FEE
9.01. Target Fee
With respect to the Initial Term and each Renewal Term
the Service Recipient, Service Provider and Contractor shall agree on a Target
Fee which shall be based on (i) the projected operations and maintenance costs
and (Si) Contractor's Service Charge for overhead and profit.
9.02. Payments to Contractor.
The Contractor's monthly payments shall be the sum of
the following:
(a) Monthly Target Fee Payment - During the Initial
Term, the Service Provider shall pay the Contractor in monthly
Installments of f (including as a month any portion of a month in such
Initial Term). During each Renewal Term, the Service Provider shall pay the
Contractor an amount equal to the Target Fee for such Renewal Term divided by
twelve.
(b) Repair and Replacement Costs incurred pursuant to
section 8.01, Repair and Replacement.
9.03. Additional Fees.
(a) The Service Provider shall pay to the Contractor
all amounts recovered from any customer as damages for improper discharges of
wastewater to the extent needed to compensate the Contractor with an
additional service charge in view of the additional services required as a
result of such improper discharges.
(b) The Service Provider shall pay the Contractor the
additional fees for any additional services requested by the Service
Recipient.
9.04. Protected Cost Report.
No later than March 1st of each year, the Contractor,
Sfter review with Service Provider, shall provide the Service Recipient with a
Project Cost Report setting forth the proposed target fee for the following
Renewal Term based on the Contractor's estimate of operations and maintenance
costs and the Contractor's proposed Service Charge for the Renewal Term. In
LGL/BHC -6- 012288
Agmt
addition to addressing the proposed Target Fee, the Report shall also address
. the Contractor's estimate of Repair and Replacement Costs which the Contractor
anticipates will be incurred during the following Renewal Term.
9.05. Final Accounting.
On or before October 1 of each year, the Contractor
shall submit a final accounting to the Service Provider (the "Final Costs")
• for the operations and maintenance costs on which the Target Fee for the
preceding Term was based. The Service Charge shown on such accounting shall
be the same as the Service Charge shown on the Projected Cost Report for such
fiscal year. The amount, if any, by which the Final Costs exceeded the Target
Fee shall be remitted by Service Provider to the Contractor within 15 days
following the delivery of such final accounting. The amount, if any, by which
• the Target Fee exceeded the Final Costs shall be remitted by the Contractor to
the Service Provider with such final accounting.
SECTION 10. INVOICES
The Contractor shall invoice the Service Provider
• monthly and the Service Provider, after receipt of funds from Service
Recipient, shall make payment to the Contractor. All costs pertaining to
9.02(b) and 9.03(a) and (b) shall be fully substantiated.
SECTION 11. CONSEQUENTIAL DANAGES
• In no event shall either party or its subcontractors or vendors
of any tier be liable to the other in contract, tort, strict liability,
warranty or otherwise for any consequential or indirect damages, including
without limitation any loss of revenues, loss of use of equipment or systems,
non -operation or increased cost of operation of other equipment or systems or
cost of capital.
•
SECTION 12. INSURANCE
12.01. Service Provider to Obtain.
The Service Provider shall place and maintain with
• responsible insurance carriers qualified to do business in the
insurance required by the Service Recipient as additional insured. The
insurance certificate shall state that thirty (30) days written notice shall
be given to the Service Recipient in the event of cancellation. The
Contractor shall forward the insurance certificate to the Service Recipient.
12.02. Contractor's Responsibility.
Notwithstanding the fact that the Service Provider is
providing the required insurance for the Contractor, it shall be the
Contractor's responsibility to provide the Service Provider all necessary
documentation that may be required to underwrite such policies. In addition,
• the Contractor shall be responsible for interfacing with the Service Recipient
LGL/BHC -7- 012288
• Agmt
on all insurance matters pertaining to this Contract and shall advise the
Service Provider immediately of any required changes or addition to the limits
or the coverages.
SECTION 13. CONTRACTOR DEFAULTS AND SERVICE PROVIDER REMEDIES
13.01. Default.
A "Default" shall take place upon the occurrence of an
"Event of Default," as defined in section 13.02 of this Agreement. If a
Default shall occur and if the Default is not cured in accordance with section
13.03 of this Agreement, the Service Provider shall, to the extent permitted
by applicable law, have the right to enforce any of the remedies described in
• section 13.04 of this Agreement. A condition of "uncured default" shall occur
only after the lapse of the appropriate period under section 13.03 hereof
without reasonable action having been taken to cure the default.
a
13.02. Event of Default.
)
' The occurrence of any of the following shall constitute
an "Event of Default" for purposes of this Agreement:
(a) The institution by or against the Contractor of
bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, arrangement, debt adjustment,
liquidation or receivership proceedings in which it is alleged that the
Contractor is insolvent or unable to meet its debts as they mature if the such
proceedings are consented to or have not been dismissed within four months
following the commencement of them;
(b) The failure of the Contractor to meet its
obligations under Sections 3 or 4 of this Agreement;
(c) The failure of the Contractor (i) to pay with
commercial promptness the charges, fees and expenses of its subcontractors and
vendors providing services or goods to its in connection with its services
1 under this Agreement, or (ii) to discharge or otherwise remove any and all
mechanics', materialmen's or other liens placed on the facility or any part
thereof by any of its subcontractors or vendors or their subcontractors or
vendors of any tier; and
(d) The Contractor's breach of any other material
obligation of this Agreement.
13.03. Notice and Cure.
•
(a) The Service Provider shall give Notice to the
Contractor of any Default within the meaning of subdivisions (a), (c) and (d)
of section 13.02. with respect to Defaults a Notice of which is required by
the foregoing sentence, the Contractor shall have 9 days from the giving of
i such Notice to take all actions reasonably possible to cure such default. If
the Contractor fails within the 9 -day period to take all actions reasonably
possible to cure the default, the Service Provider may exercise any of the
remedies set forth in section 13.04 of this Agreement.
3 LGL/BHC -8- 012288
Agmt
Ll
•
(b) In the case of the occurrence of an Event of
Default described at subdivision (b) of section 13.02, the Contractor shall
take all actions reasonably possible for it to take immediately to cure such
Default upon Notice or discovery, whichever occurs first. If, in the Service
Provider's sole judgment, the Contractor proceeds in such fashion as is
reasonable in the circumstance and continues to pursue such cure with all
reasonable diligence under the circumstances, the Contractor shall not be
deemed to be in uncured Default within the meaning of this Section 13.
13.04. Remedies.
The Service Provider shall have the following remedies
against the Contractor in the event it does not cure its Defaults as set forth
in section 13.03:
(a) The Serv:
Contractor's compensation under th
Event of Default, until such time
portion of such compensation due unc
directly to the entity to whom suc
relieved of further liability to
Contractor's compensation pertaining
ce Provider may withhold payment of the
Ls Agreement without it constituting an
as the Default is cured or may pay any
er subdivision (c) of section 13.02 above
i payment is due and shall thereafter be
the Contractor for that portion of the
to such payment;
(b) The Service Provider may contract with a third
party for provision of the services to be rendered by the Contractor under
this Agreement;
(c) The Service Provider may terminate this Agreement
for cause; and
(d) The Service Provider may demand that the
Contractor, and the Contractor shall, reimburse the Service Provider for all
the expenses incurred by the Service Provider as a result of the Default,
including damages and expenses incurred before expiration of the period of
curing the Default set forth in Section 13.03 above.
The foregoing remedies shall be in addition to, and not
in limitation of, all remedies available at law or in equity to the Service
Provider.
SECTION 14. SERVICE RECIPIENT DEFAULTS AND CONTRACTOR REMEDIES
14.01. Events of Default.
A Default by the Service Recipient shall occur if (i)
the Service Recipient fails to pay any amount which has become due hereunder
(ii) the Service Recipient fails to take the corrective measures required by
section 15.02 hereof when it is discovered that Service Recipient's customers
are discharging effluents which fail to meet the influent standards specified
on Appendix 1 or (iii) the Service Recipient fails to assist or cooperate in
securing required permits as contemplated by section 5.01.
LCL/BHC -9- 012288
Agmt
li
t
i
14.02. Contractor's Remedies.
The Contractor may, upon the occurrence of a Default by
the Service Recipient (i) terminate this Agreement, (ii) refuse to accept
influent for treatment or (iii) bring a civil action for damages or equitable
relief, or both. The foregoing remedies shall be cumulative, and the pursuit
of any one of them shall not be deemed an election by the Contractor depriving
it of whatever right it may have to pursue another remedy in conjunction
therewith or at a later date.
SECTION 15. SEWERAGE CUSTOMER COMPLIANCE
15.01. Service Recipient's Duties.
The Service Recipient has agreed with the Service
Provider under the terms of the Service Agreement that the Service Recipient
shall establish and enforce standards of effluent discharge as a condition of
original connection and continued connection, which shall conform in all
material respects with Appendix 1 and the Service Recipient shall diligently
police compliance with such standards.
15.02. Corrective Action.
If at any time the Service Recipient is notified of or
otherwise discovers that one or more of its customers are discharging effluent
in violation of the standards established by the Service Recipient, or which
otherwise fails to meet the influent standards of Appendix 1 or which
nevertheless are having the effect either of destroying or harming any
component of the Facility or of otherwise making it impossible or unreasonably
difficult for the Contractor to meet the discharge standards of Appendix 1,
then the Service Recipient immediately shall take each and every action which
it is entitled or permitted lawfully to take to require the stoppage and
cessation of such discharges. Such corrective action shall include, but not
be limited to, (i) disconnection (or authorizing the Contractor to disconnect)
such customer from the Facility or otherwise blocking the intrusion of its
wastewater discharges into the Facility, (ii) the commencement of civil
proceedings to obtain an injunction against and damages in respect of such
improper discharges; (iii) voluntary cessation by such customer and (iv) any
other activity reasonably likely to accomplish such result.
15.03. Cooperation.
The Service Recipient shall cooperate with the
Contractor to develop pre-treatment standards for any customer who desires to
connect to the Facility whose discharges will not meet the influent standards
of Appendix 1 and Service Recipient's standards.
LGL/BHC
Agmt
-10-
012288
SECTION 16. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
16.01. Service Provider's Representations and Warranties.
The Service Provider represents and warrants as follows:
(a) The Service Provider is a corporation duly
organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State
of and has the corporate power to own its property and to carry on its
business as now being conducted. The Service Provider has the corporate power
to execute and deliver this Agreement and to consummate the transactions
contemplated hereby.
(b) The execution and delivery of this Agreement and
the transactions contemplated hereby have been duly authorized by the Board of
Directors of the Service Provider and all other corporate action of the
Service Provider necessary to authorize the execution and delivery of this
Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby, also have been taken. No
consent of any lender, trustee, security holder or any other person or entity
is required to be obtained by Service Provider in connection with the
execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by the Service Provider
and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby. This Agreement
constitutes a valid and binding obligation of the Service Provider enforceable
in accordance with its terms. The execution, delivery and performance of this
Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby (a) do
f not violate or constitute a breach of default under any contract, agreement or
t• commitment to which the Service Provider is a party, under which it is
obligated or to which either the Facility of the System is subject, (b) do not
violate (i) any judgment, order, statute, rule or regulation to which the
Service Provider, the Facility or the System is subject to (ii) the articles
of incorporation or by-laws of the Service Provider and (c) will not result in
the creation of any lien, charge or encumbrance on either the Facility or the
System.
(c) The Service Provider and the Service Recipient have
received all governmental approvals needed to permit it to own and to operate
the System and the Facility, and to discharge treated wastewater which meets
the effluent standards described in Appendix 1 at the discharge site or sites
described in Appendix 3.
(d) No approval of any government body is necessary to
permit or authorize the Service Provider to execute and deliver this Agreement
or to permit the Contractor to operate and maintain the Facility and the
System under the terms hereof.
LID 16.02. Contractor's Representations and Warranties.
The Contractor represents and warrants as follows:
(a) The Contractor is a corporation duly organized,
validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of
California, is licensed to do business in Arizona and has the corporate power
to own its property and to carry on is business as now being conducted. The
LGL/BHC -11- 012288
Agmt
Contractor has the corporate power to execute and deliver this Agreement and
to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby.
(b) The execution and delivery of this Agreement and
: the transactions contemplated hereby have been duly authorized by the Board of
Directors of the Contractor and all other corporate action of the Contractor
necessary to authorize the execution and delivery of this. Agreement and the
transactions contemplated hereby, also have been taken. No consent of any
lender, trustee, security holder or any other person or entity is required to
be obtained by Contractor in connection with the execution, delivery and
performance of this Agreement by the Contractor and the consummation of the
transactions contemplated hereby. This Agreement constitutes a valid and
binding obligation of Contractor enforceable in accordance with its terms.
The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement and the consummation
of the transactions contemplated hereby (i) do not violate or constitute a
breach of or default under any contract, agreement or commitment to which
Contractor is a party or under which it is obligated and (ii) do not violate
any judgment, order, statute, rule or regulation to which Contractor is
subject or the articles of incorporation or by-laws of the Contractor.
(c) The Contractor is a qualified operator of
wastewater treatment facilities and systems and employs persons with the
knowledge, skills and experience needed to operate and maintain the Facility
under the terms of this Agreement.
SECTION 17. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
17.01. Entire Agreement; Amendment; Modification.
This Agreement contains the entire understanding among
the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes
all prior and contemporaneous agreements and understandings, inducements and
conditions, express or implied, oral or written, except as herein contained.
The express terms hereof control and supersede any course of performance or
usage of the trade inconsistent with any of the terms hereof. This Agreement
may not be modified or amended other than by an agreement in writing signed by
all of the parties hereto.
17.02. Indulgences.
Neither the failure nor any delay on the part of any
party to exercise any right, remedy, power or privilege under this Agreement
shall operate as a waiver thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise of
any right, remedy, power or privilege preclude any other or further exercise
• of the same or of any other right, remedy, power or privilege, nor shall any
waiver of any right, remedy, power- or privilege with respect to any
occurrences be construed as a waiver of such right, remedy, power or privilege
with respect to any other occurrence. No waiver shall be effective unless it
is in writing and is signed by the Service Provider asserted to have granted
such waiver.
LGL/BHC -12- 012288
Agmt
17.03. Controlling Law.
This Agreement and all questions relating to its
validity, interpretation, performance and enforcement shall be governed by and
construed in accordance with the laws of the State of , notwithstanding
any or other conflict -of -law provision of the contrary.
17.04. Notices.
All notices, requests, demands and other communications
required or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be
deemed to have been received when delivered against receipt or on the third
business day following the mailing, by registered or certified mail, postage
prepaid, return receipt requested, thereof addressed as set forth below:
If to the Service Provider:
If to the Contractor:
Any party may change the address to which communications
or copies are to be sent by giving notice of such change of address in
conformity with the provisions of this section for the giving of notice.
17.05. Binding Nature of Agreement: No Assignment.
This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the
benefit of the parties hereto and their successors and assigns, except that no
party may assign or transfer its rights or obligations under this Agreement
without the prior written consent of the other party hereto.
17.06. Exhibits and Appendices.
All Exhibits and Appendices attached hereto and referred
to herein are hereby incorporated by reference into, and made part of, this
Agreement at each place where such reference is made.
17.07. Nature of Relationship.
The relationship which the parties intend to create
upder this Agreement is that of principal and independent Contractor and
nothing herein is intended or shall be construed so as to create a
relationship of partnership, coventurers or employment between the Service
Provider and the Contractor. The Service Provider shall not have the right to
direct or control the activities or practices of the Contractor, except as
expressly provided in this Agreement.
LGL/BHC -13- 012288
Agmt
17.08. Execution in Counterparts.
This Agreement may be executed in any number of
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original as against any
party whose signature appears thereon, and all of which shall together
constitute one and the same instrument. This Agreement shall become binding
when one or more counterparts hereof, individually or taken together, shall
bear the signatures of all of the parties reflected hereon as the signatories.
t 17.09. Provisions Severable.
The provision of this Agreement and each section or
other subdivision hereof are independent of and severable from each other, and
• no provision shall be affected or rendered invalid or unenforceable by virtue
of the fact that for any reason any other or others of them may be invalid or
unenforceable in whole or in part.
17.10. Section and Paragraph Headings.
The section and paragraph headings in this Agreement are
for convenience of reference only; they form no part of this agreement and
shall not affect its interpretation.
17.11. Gender.
j Words used herein, regardless of the number and gender
1 specifically used, shall be deemed and construed to include any other number,
singular or plural, and any other gender, masculine, feminine, or neuter,
which the context requires.
17.12. Sections.
This Agreement is divided into sections, numbered in
whole arabic numbers, each of which is subdivided into subdivisions numbered
with the whole arabic designation of the section in which it is located,
followed by a decimal point and an arabic numeral designating the
subdivision. Both the sections and the subdivisions are referred to as
"Section." In construing this Agreement, the word Section should be given the
• meaning which its context suggests and doubts should be resolved in favor of
I the broader designation.
` 17.13. Number of Days.
Except as expressly stated to the contrary elsewhere
herein, in computing the number of days for purposes of this Agreement, all
` days shall be counted, including Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays
in ; provided, however, that if the final day of any time period falls
On a Saturday, Sunday, or such a holiday, then the final day shall be deemed
to be the next day which is not a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday in
1
LGL/BHC -14- 012288
Agmt
17.14. The Facility
References herein to the Facility shall be deemed to
include expansions thereof occurring during the Initial Term or any Renewal
Term, provided that appropriate amendments are made in the manner of
calculating the Contractor's fee and the service charge element thereof.
17.15. Recitals.
The parties agree that the Recitals are a part of this
Agreement and the provisions thereof binding among the parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as
of the date first above written.
PARSONS MUNICIPAL SERVICE, INC.
By:
PARSONS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
By:
LGL/BHC -15- 012288
Agmt
AP
1. Wastewater Influent Standards a
+ 2. Personnel Job Descriptions
1 3. Description of Discharge Site(s
LGL/BHC -16- 012288
Agmt
C✓H,- www
PARSONS MUNICIPAL SERVICES, INC.
100 WEST WALNUT STREET
PASADENA. CALIFORNIA 91124
(&Ie 2000
TOW. WH: 675936
October 11, 1988
Mr. Dennis A. Erdman
General Manager
Capistrano Valley Wastewater Authority
25752 Victoria Blvd.
P. O. Box 2008
Capistrano Beach, CA 92624
Subject: Addendum to Parsons' Proposal for the
Maintenance of a New 6.3 MGD Wastewater
Treatment Facility for the Capistrano Valley
Wastewater Authority, dated August 9, 1988
Dear Mr. Erdman:
&Cv'l 10-13•FP
• Pursuant to our agreement to incorporate the subject proposal into
the Master Agreement by reference, the following shall apply,
which shall constitute an addendum to our proposal:
1. The schedules set forth in Parsons' proposal are subject to
mutually agreed changes based upon the actual date of Notice
• to Proceed, final design constraints, permitting status, site
and soil considerations and other circumstances being within
Parsons' reasonable control.
2. All references to estimated capital and operating costs for
alternative treatment processes included within Parsons'
• proposal are order of magnitude estimates for planning
purposes only and are therefore not binding upon Parsons.
1•
4. The computer models and mass balance diagrams contained within
Appendix E are based upon information supplied by the
Authority, which information was not verified by Parsons.
Such models and diagrams are therefore not guaranteed.
KPH/BLB:tc
A SUBSIDIARY OF THE PARSONS CORPORATION
Very truly yours,
PARSONS MUNICIPAL SERVICES, INC.
Kline� rney, Jr.
President