Loading...
06-1121_PSOMAS _Action Reminder 1714sk- Ncrncc- CITY CLERK'S DEPARTMENT-ACTION REMINDER TO: W11 t FROM: Christy Swanson, Secretary DATE: March 1, 2007 SITUATION: On November 21, 2006, the City of San Juan Capistrano entered into a Personal Services Agreement with PSOMAS to provide Assessment of Additional Ground Water Recovery Plant Well Sites. ACTION REQUESTED: Said Agreement states services shall be completed by March 31, 2007. Please notify our office if agreement has been completed or will be extended. ACTION TO BE TAKEN: DATE WHEN NEXT ACTION (S) SHOULD BE TAKEN: SIGNATURE OF OFFICIAL TAKING ACTION: DATE SIGNED: *`*FOR CITY CLERK'S DEPARTMENT USE ONLY*** Tickler Date: 03/01/07 Deadline Date: 03/31/07 (600.301psomas) 0 0 PERSONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT �THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of /, 2006, by and between the City of San Juan Capistrano (hereinafter referred to as the "City") and PSOMAS, (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"). RECITALS: WHEREAS, City desires to retain the services of Consultant for the Assessment of Additional Ground Water Recovery Plant Well Sites; and WHEREAS, Consultant is qualified by virtue of experience, training, education and expertise to accomplish such services. NOW, THEREFORE, City and Consultant mutually agree as follows: Section 1. Scope of Work. The scope of work to be performed by Consultant shall consist of those tasks as set forth in Exhibit "A," Described as PSOMAS's Proposal to Install, Develop and Conduct a Production Test of Two Pilot Wells that will be used for Design of Production Wells for the City of San Juan Capistrano," dated September 20, 2006, attached and incorporated herein by reference. Consultant warrants that all of its services shall be performed in a competent, professional and satisfactory manner and in accordance with the prevalent standards of its profession. Section 2. Term. This Agreement shall commence on the effective date of this Agreement and services required hereunder shall be completed by no later 120 days from the date of Notice to Proceed. Section 3. Compensation. 3.1 Amount. Total compensation for the scope of services for this Project shall not exceed Ninety Thousand Three Hundred Dollars ($90,300.00) as set forth in Exhibit "A." 3.2 Rate Schedule. SD 1 0 0 The services shall be billed to the City at the hourly rate set forth in Exhibit "A," attached and incorporated herein by reference. Included within the compensation are all the Consultant's ordinary office and overhead expenses incurred by it, its agents and employees, including meetings with the City representatives and incidental costs to perform the stipulated services. Submittals shall be in accordance with Consultant's proposal. 3.3 Method of Payment. Consultant shall submit monthly invoices based on total services, which have been satisfactorily completed and specifying a percentage of projected completion for approval by the City. The City will pay monthly progress payments based on approved invoices in accordance with this Section. For extra work not part of this Agreement, a written authorization from City is required prior to Consultant undertaking any extra work. 3.4 Records of Expenses. Consultant shall keep complete and accurate records of all costs and expenses incidental to services covered by this Agreement. These records will be made available at reasonable times to City. Section 4. Independent Contractor. It is agreed that Consultant shall act and be an independent contractor and not an agent or employee of City, and shall obtain no rights to any benefits which accrue to City's employees. Section 5. Limitations Upon Subcontracting and Assignment. The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Consultant, its principals and employees were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Consultant shall not contract with any other entity to perform the services required without written approval of the City. This Agreement may not be assigned, voluntarily or by operation of law, without the prior written approval of the City. If Consultant is permitted to subcontract any part of this Agreement by City, Consultant shall be responsible to City for the acts and omissions of its subcontractor as it is for persons directly employed. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationships between any subcontractor and City. All persons engaged in the work will be considered employees of Consultant. City will deal directly with and will make all payments to Consultant. 2 0 0 Section 6. Changes to Scope of Work. In the event of a change in the Scope of Work provided for in the contract documents as requested by the City, the Parties hereto shall execute an addendum to this Agreement setting forth with particularity all terms of the new agreement, including but not limited to any additional Consultant's fees. Section 7. Familiarity with Work and Construction Site. By executing this Agreement, Consultant warrants that: (1) it has investigated the work to be performed; (2) it has investigated the proposed construction site, including the location of all observable utilities, and is aware of all observable conditions there, and (3) it understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions of the work under this Agreement. Should Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions materially differing from those inherent in the work or as represented by City, it shall immediately inform City of this and shall not proceed with further work under this Agreement until written instructions are received from the City. Section 8. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. Section 9. Compliance with Law. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, codes and regulations of federal, state and local government. Section 10. Conflicts of Interest. Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of the services contemplated by this Agreement. No person having such interest shall be employed by or associated with Consultant. Section 11. Copies of Work Product. At the completion of the contract period, Consultant shall have delivered to City at least one (1) copy of any final reports and architectural drawings containing Consultant's findings, conclusions, and recommendations with any support documentation. All reports submitted to the City shall be in reproducible format. All services to be rendered hereunder shall be subject to the direction and approval of the City. 3 • • Section 12. Ownership of Documents. All reports, information, data and exhibits prepared or assembled by Consultant in connection with the performance of its services pursuant to this Agreement are confidential to the extent permitted by law, and Consultant agrees that they shall not be made available to any individual or organization without prior written consent of the City. All such reports, information, data, and exhibits shall be the property of the City and shall be delivered to the City upon demand without additional costs or expense to the City. The City acknowledges such documents are instruments of Consultant's professional services. City's reuse of such materials on a project other than the Recycled Water Supply System shall be at the City's sole risk. Section 13. Indemnity. Consultant agrees to protect, defend and hold harmless City, its elected and appointed officials and employees from any and all claims, liabilities, expenses or damages of any nature, including attorneys' fees, for injury or death of any person or damage to property or interference with use of property to the extent resulting form the negligent or other wrongful acts, errors and omissions committed by Consultant arising out of or in connection with the work, operation or activities of Consultant, its agents, employees and subcontractors in carrying out its obligations under this Agreement. Consultants liability hereunder shall be limited to the grater of Consultant's fee or $50,000. Section 14. Insurance. Insurance required herein shall be valid for a minimum of one year, or term of contract, whichever is longer, and it shall be provided by Admitted Insurers in good standing with the State of California and having a minimum Best's Guide Rating of A- Class VII or better. 14.1 Comprehensive General Liability. Throughout the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain in full force and effect Comprehensive General Liability coverage in the following minimum amounts: $500,000 property damage; $500,000 injury to one person/any one occurrence/not limited to contractual period; $1,000,000 injury to more than one person/any one occurrence/not limited to contractual period. If subject to a general aggregate, such aggregates shall be at least $1,000,000. 14.2 Comprehensive Automobile Liability. 4 0 0 Throughout the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain in full force and effect Comprehensive Automobile Liability coverage, including owned, hired and non- owned vehicles in the following minimum amounts: $500,000 property damage; $500,000 injury to one person/any one occurrence/not limited to contractual period; $1,000,000 injury to more than one person/any one occurrence/not limited to contractual period 14.3 Worker's Compensation. If Consultant intends to employ employees to perform services under this Agreement, Consultant shall obtain and maintain, during the term of this Agreement, Worker's Compensation Employer's Liability Insurance in the statutory amount as required by state law. 14.4 Proof of Insurance Requirements/Endorsement. Prior to beginning any work under this Agreement, Consultant shall submit the insurance certificates, including the deductible or self-retention amount, and an additional insured endorsement to the Consultant's general liability and umbrella liability policies to the City Clerk's office for certification that the insurance requirements of this Agreement have been satisfied. 14.5 Errors and Omissions Coverage Throughout the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain Errors and Omissions Coverage (professional liability coverage) in an amount of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000). Prior to beginning any work under this Agreement, Consultant shall submit an insurance certificate to the Clerk of the Board's office for certification that the insurance requirements of this Agreement have been satisfied. 14.6 Notice of Cancellation/Termination of Insurance. The above policy/policies shall not terminate, nor shall they be cancelled, nor the coverages reduced, until after thirty (30) days' written notice is given to City, except that ten (10) days' notice shall be given if there is a cancellation due to failure to pay a premium. 14.7 Terms of Compensation. 5 • 0 Consultant shall not receive any compensation until all insurance provisions have been satisfied. 14.8 Notice to Proceed. Consultant shall not proceed with any work under this Agreement until the City has issued a written "Notice to Proceed" verifying that Consultant has complied with all insurance requirements of this Agreement. Section 15. Termination. City and Consultant shall have the right to terminate this Agreement without cause by giving thirty (30) days' advance written notice of termination to the other party In addition, this Agreement may be terminated for cause by providing ten (10) days' notice to the other party of a material breach of contract. If the other party does not cure the breach of contract, then the agreement may be terminated subsequent to the ten (10) day cure period. Section 16. Notice. All notices shall be personally delivered or mailed to the below listed addresses, or to such other addresses as may be designated by written notice. These addresses shall be used for delivery of service of process: To City: City of San Juan Capistrano 32400 Paseo Adelanto San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Attn: Public Works Director To Consultant: PSOMAS 3187 red Hill Avenue Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Attn: John R. Thornton, Vice President / Principal Section 17. Attorneys' Fees. If any action at law or in equity is necessary to enforce or interpret the terms of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees, costs and necessary disbursements in addition to any other relief to which he may be entitled. Section 18. Dispute Resolution. In the event of a dispute where the amount in controversy does not exceed the greater of the consultants fee or $50,000 arising between the parties regarding performance or interpretation of this Agreement, the dispute shall be resolved by 6 • 0 binding arbitration under the auspices of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Service ("JAMS"). Section 19. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding and agreement between the parties and supersedes all previous negotiations between them pertaining to the subject matter thereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement. CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO By: o David 5. K e'Gin, ayor CONSULTANT By: A— Un R. Thornton, Vice President / Principal AT T: Mar ar . Mon h ity C rk APPROVED AS TO FORM: John R. aw, City Attorney 7 Information and Engineering Solutions September 20, 2006 Mr. Eric Bauman [ 1 City of San Juan Capistrano 32400 Paseo Adelanto San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Re: Proposal to Install, Develop and Conduct a Production Test of Two Pilot Test Wells that will be used for Design of Production Wells for the City of San Juan Capistrano, California. Dear Mr. Bauman: Psomas is pleased to submit this proposal to install, develop and conduct a production test of two pilot wells in the City of San Juan Capistrano (CSJC), California. This proposal is based on your e-mail dated August 30, 2006 requesting test borings at the Ricardo and North Cooks well sites. In addition, CSJC requested a potential yield evaluation for two other sites referred to as MW-07 and South Cooks well sites. BACKGROUND In an effort to enhance groundwater production in the lower San Juan Creek groundwater basin, the CSJC is seeking suitable sites to expand existing production. Two potential sites have been selected and include a location near existing San Juan Basin Authority (SJBA) monitoring well MW-07 referred to as the Ricardo Well site and another well located near existing SJBA monitoring well MW-04. Psomas' understanding is that the CSJC wishes to develop test borings in these areas to evaluate the suitability of these sites for a full size production wells. In addition, the CSJC wishes to evaluate other sites in proximity to the existing SJBA monitoring wells (MW-07 & MW-04) to assess if these locations could be used as alternative production well locations. APPROACH Psomas has evaluated the existing conditions at each of these sites and preliminary indications are that high production zones may be present. However, the high production zones typically include high permeability zones composed of gravels, cobbles and boulders that create difficult drilling conditions for most conventional drilling technologies. 3187 Red Hill Avenue Suite 250 Costa Mesa,CA 92626 714.751 7373 EXHIBIT "A" 7145458883 Ga+ www Psomas com PSOMAS Proposal to Install, Develop and Conduct a Production Page 2 of 7 Test of Two Pilot Test Wells for City of San Juan Capistrano September 20, 2006 Most drilling technologies that are capable of advancing in these types of conditions typically use drilling fluids composed of bentonite. The use of bentonite generally requires extended development time to remove the drilling fluids in order to assess the true production capability of the zone being evaluated. Psomas proposes to advance the borings using an advanced drilling technology that does not use a circulating medium and can penetrate gravels, cobbles and boulders. The technique, RotaSonic, employs a high frequency vibration to the drilling shoe to advance an 8 to 10-inch casing. A continuous core of soil is extracted as the casing is advanced providing a good understanding of the geology and corresponding production capability of each zone encountered as the boring is progressed. Upon reaching the desired depth (bedrock), the boring can be abandoned or can be completed as a pilot test well to conduct further evaluations. Psomas proposes to complete the two test borings into 4 to 5-inch diameter pilot test wells and conduct a single well aquifer test using a submersible pump. Preliminary estimates (using a transmissivity of 45,000 gpd/ft) indicate that a 4 to 5-inch pilot test well would be capable of 100 gpm and should experience a drawdown of approximately 1-2 feet over a four hour test period (assuming a fully penetrating aquifer). The tests can be evaluated and calculations can be made concerning full scale production wells including anticipated drawdown and production rate. If the location is selected for a full scale production well, the pilot well could be used as a monitoring well during development and testing of the full scale production well. SCOPE OF SERVICES Task 1 —Well Permits and Mobilization Psomas will obtain well permits from the Orange County Environmental Health for the installation of the pilot test wells. The proposed well locations will be marked and Psomas will notify Underground Service Alert (USA) at least 48 hours prior to drilling. Task 2— Well Installation and Development Psomas proposes to advance and install two pilot test wells at the locations indicated in Figures 1 & 2. The wells will be advanced using a truck-mounted Rota-Sonic drill rig. Formation samples will be collected continuously for purposes of describing the local soils and geology and will be logged in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. PSOMAS Proposal to Install, Develop and Conduct a Production Page 3 of 7 Test of Two Pilot Test Wells for City of San Juan Capistrano September 20, 2006 Pilot Test Wells will be constructed based on the following criteria: Ricardo Test Well • 4-inch diameter schedule 40 PVC flush-threaded casing • 40 feet of 4-inch diameter schedule 40 PVC screen with 0.02 slot (actual slot size will be evaluated at the time of well completion) • Flush mount completion in a traffic-rated well box North Cook Test Well • 4-inch diameter schedule 40 PVC flush-threaded casing • 40 feet of 4-inch diameter schedule 40 PVC screen with 0.02 slot (actual slot size will be evaluated at the time of well completion) • Flush mount completion in a traffic-rated well box The newly installed pilot test wells will be developed immediately following installation. The pilot test wells will be developed by a combination of bailing, swabbing, airlifting and/or purging with an electric submersible pump. Development will continue until field parameters stabilize (less than 10% change from previous reading) and the discharge is visually free of suspended solids or 3 hours of development, which ever occurs first. During well development procedures, groundwater field parameters consisting of pH, electrical conductivity (EC), dissolved oxygen (DO), temperature in degrees Celsius (°C) and turbidity will be monitored with field instruments. Task 3—Aquifer Test Psomas proposes to conduct a single well aquifer test on each of the pilot test wells. Preliminary calculations indicate that at a production rate of 100 gpm and a transmissivity of 45,000 gpd/ft, the pilot test well should indicate a 1-2 feet decline over approximately 4 hours. Depending on the rate of decline and the ultimate decline, a transmissivity for the underlying production zone can be approximated. The results coupled with the geology and depth to bedrock can be used to assess the production rate and preliminary design of a full scale production well. In addition, Psomas will collect a water sample during the aquifer test to assess the general water quality characteristics of the water produced during the aquifer test. Table 1 present a list of the proposed parameters/constituents and analytical method to be performed on the water sample collected from each well. PSOMAS Proposal to Install, Develop and Conduct a Production Page 4 of 7 Test of Two Pilot Test Wells for City of San Juan Capistrano September 20, 2006 TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES FOR VARIOUS PARAMETERS Pilot Test Wells for CSJC Type of Analysis Analytical Method General Minerals(Na,K, EPA 200,7 Ca,Mg) Total Dissolved Solids EPA 160.1 Bicarbonate/Carbonate SM 2320B Alkalinity Total Hardness as CaCO3 SM 23408 Chloride,Nitrate as N, EPA 300.0 Sulfate Boron 200.8 Fluoride SM 4500-FC Dissolved Metals(As,Ba, Be,Cd,Cr,Cu,Fe,Pb,Hg, EPA 200.8 Mn,Ni,Se,Ag,Th,V,Zn) Hexavalent Chromium EPA 218.6 Task 4—Data Analysis Following completion of aquifer testing activities, the data collected will be reduced and analyzed and transmissivity will be developed for aquifer at the pilot test well. A preliminary design and expected production capacity of a full scale production well will be assessed from the data collected. In addition, Psomas will evaluate the existing reports for wells MW-7 and MW-4 to assess the viability of these locations for production wells. Task 5 — Pilot Well Test Report Following completion and analysis of the aquifer test on each of the Pilot Test wells, a report will be prepared that presents the methodologies employed and results of the installation and testing of the Pilot Test wells. The report will include boring logs, testing procedures and results, and a summary of the expected production capacity of a full scale production well at an adjacent location. In addition, the report will include a preliminary design and expected PSOMAS Proposal to Install, Develop and Conduct a Production Page 5 of 7 Test of Two Pilot Test Wells for City of San Juan Capistrano September 20, 2006 production capacity of a full scale production well along with a recommended drilling method for completing the proposed production well. SCHEDULE Following notice to proceed, the proposed scope of work could be completed in approximately 3 months. Table 2 presents the anticipated time requirements for each of the proposed tasks. TABLE 2 TIME REQUIREMENTS BY TASK Pilot Test Wells for CSJC Item Time Requirements Task 1 —Well Permits and Mobilization 20 days Task 2—Well Installation and Development 15 days Task 3 — Aquifer Testing 5 days Task 4—Data Analysis 10 days Task 5—Pilot Well Testing Report 20 days Mobilization to the field will be dependent on acquisition and approval of the well permits. Delays in approval or changes to the anticipated scope of work may have an impact on the overall schedule. COST ESTIMATE The proposed scope of work will be conducted on a time and materials basis with an estimated total cost of$90,300. A breakdown of the cost by individual task is included in Table 3. TABLE 3 SUMMARY OF COSTS BY TASK SKIC Well Installation and Quarterly Monitoring TASK COST Task 1 —Well Permitting & Mobilization $5,400 Task 2 —Well Installation and $51,500 Development Task 3 — Aquifer Test $10,900 Task 4—Data Anal sis $10,300 Task 5—Pilot Test Well Report $12,200 TOTAL $90,300 PSOMAS Proposal to Install, Develop and Conduct a Production Page 6 of 7 Test of Two Pilot Test Wells for City of San Juan Capistrano September 20, 2006 LIST OF ASSUMPTIONS The following assumptions were used in developing the schedule and associated cost estimate for this project. 1. Psomas and its subcontractors will be given unencumbered access to the proposed pilot test well locations. 2. No encroachment permits or access agreements are required to drill, install, and test the proposed pilot test wells. 3. Traffic control is not required as part of the proposed work. 4. Onsite work activities are not delayed by CSJC or others. 5. The advancement and completion of proposed pilot test wells takes no more than 2 days. 6. A roll-off bin for the containment of drill cuttings will be deployed at the site. The cuttings will be disposed of at a local landfill as non-hazardous waste. . 7. Development and Aquifer Test water will be contained in a Baker Tank at the site. The CSJC will be responsible for disposition of the water. A total of 30 days rental has been budgeted for two Baker Tanks. 8. A total of 2 water samples will be collected and analyzed for the parameters listed in Table 1. 9. All field activities will occur during normal working hours (7:00 am-7:00 pm) Monday through Friday. 10. Final Pilot Test Well Report will include a discussion of the well construction and testing activities, site location map, and table of the laboratory analytical results. The report will also include a preliminary design and recommended drilling methods for the full scale production well proposed for the various locations. The report will also include as appendices: laboratory reporting forms, chain of custody forms, boring logs, aquifer testing results, and field sampling forms. PSOMASRow Proposal to Install, Develop and Conduct a Production Page 7 of 7 Test of Two Pilot Test Wells for City of San Juan Capistrano September 20, 2006 11. One draft report will be submitted for one round of review by CSJC. Following CSJC review, the report will be finalized and five (5) copies of the final report will be submitted to CSJC. All work will be performed in accordance with the attached agreement which is included and made part of this proposal. We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal and look forward to working with you on this project. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, PSOMAS },Qh R. Thornton, P.E. Michael P. Donovan, R.G., C.Hg. Principal and Vice President Senior Hydrogeologist Attachments .+ � � 4 rr= `"' k� M .`�-Jc x �A. W'tip�'ry' w�%y►tr. (�.t�e�'i y !q /A 4 y t N tea"" + � � _ .•t�.. Y",�1.'s • ..": e I�' �yG' �� � { �% � Jj�Q• 4 H ''ll'tt .� _ lie; - ■ ".�/e iis. 1 �.1 ✓ s r _ North Cooks J. aL 77 qJ 1�J 1V`FCCWSI}rb'' rJ �T ".. Tr M a i L,:7 _. / d u � n � ? �. � �,4:, � ,�l�'�sero- ' •-- '�' q� '� y .. PSOMAS �� .,. . .. . 4' ._tel .9•-�-+, "' A}" Hollywood 2AMission Street �y R ti 1 �y 1 � PO �t ` � ~ 1�,, / � ,�CS _ .y Lir.. �.�+'�. }-,� � �•'�' A+ t Al" � i S Ric r• • Wilke" _ ^ {1 4 ft'.t� / 4 ^ y'�iy r �t Dance Hall r ^t 4 za`�' - �i 1 Ari_ .•r �„� ,t, .. ,� s r 'v k 32400 PASEO ADELANTO MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO,CA 92675 (949)493-1171 //$$ SAM ALLEVATO (949)493-1053 FAX a js I mtu AvouifE DIANE BATHGATE areBlsem 1961 WVATT HART ww ..sanjuancapistrano.org 1776 • • JOE SOTO DAVID M.BWERDLIN e TRANSMITTAL TO: John R. Thornton PSOMAS 3187 Red Hill Avenue Costa Mesa, CA 92626 DATE: November 27, 2006 FROM: Maria Morris, Deputy City Clerk (949) 443-6309 RE: Personal Services Agreement—Assessment of Additional Ground Water Recovery Plant Well Sites Thank you for maintaining documentation confirming compliance with the terms of the agreement related to insurance. Please keep in mind this documentation must remain current with our office during the term of this agreement. If you have questions related to insurance requirements, please call me at (949) 443-6309. If you have questions concerning the agreement, please contact Eric Bauman, Water Engineer Manager (949)487-4312. An original, executed agreement is enclosed for your records. Cc: Eric Bauman, Water Engineer Manager John Elwell, Interim Engineering & Building Director San Juan Capistrano: Preserving the Past to Enhance the Future 0 Printed on 100%Recycled Paper • • 11/21/2006 AGENDA REPORT D4 TO: Dave Adams, City Manager QVI FROM: John W. Elwell, Interim Public Works Director SUBJECT: Consideration of Agreement for the Assessment of Additional Ground Water Recovery Plant Well Sites (PSOMAS) (CIP# 758) RECOMMENDATION: By motion, approve an agreement for the assessment of additional Ground Water Recovery Plant well sites with PSOMAS in the amount of $90,300; and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement. SITUATION: Since mid August 2006, the production at the Ground Water Recovery Plant (GRWP) has been cut from 5.14 MGD (million gallons per day) to 2.57 MGD due to a reduction in the amount of well water. The public is not affected by the reduced production since the system has import capacity to replace it. This occurrence is primarily caused because the concentration of wells is within a close area, which seems to draw down the water level more than was projected. While the San Juan Groundwater Basin (the 'Basin") continues to have water, the area where the wells are located has problems maintaining water levels sufficient to meet the full demand in the late summer. When the water level becomes too low, then air is entrained in the water. Entrained air causes iron to precipitate and foul the reverse osmosis membranes. The plant operators, ECO Resources Inc. (ECO), reduced production at the GWRP to match the plant capacities and the currently available groundwater yields. ECO then began a process of well cleaning and re-habilitation of its wells. This process will increase production, but analysis of the groundwater table in the vicinity of four of the GWRP wells located in or near the Village Alipaz development indicates a localized depression in the Basin. The two wells outside of this area have experienced a drop in pumping levels but still remain productive. Experience with the GWRP wells and the Basin is limited, but indicates that production should pick up after the first recharging rains starting in December 2006, allowing the GWRP to meet its annual production goal of 4,800 acre-feet per year. However, to avoid future summer time production shortfalls in the long-term, well productivity must be increased. The hydrogeologist for the San Juan Basin Authority (SJBA), PSOMAS, believes that the Basin has water and that the GWRP is experiencing a localized depletion of the Agenda Report • 0 November 21, 2006 Page 2 Basin that can be mitigated by spreading the demand from the Basin over a wider area, resting the wells on a rotation basis, and continuing with an annual rehabilitation of the wells. PSOMAS made a presentation on its analysis of the Basin at the September 26, 2006, Water Advisory Commission meeting. At this meeting, it was explained in detail how it was concluded to increase the basin yield and to implement a program of well resting and maintenance, and that the GWRP will need more wells than its current complement of six wells. The original project design called for a total of eight wells to operate the GRWP at full capacity. During the well development stage, preliminary drilling at two of the well locations did not yield sufficient water to justify full development. ECO proceeded with six wells since the provisions of the Service Contract allowed ECO to do so if it had sufficient water to run the GWRP. Since the Service Contract with ECO calls for eight wells and they no longer meet the raw water demands of the GWRP, ECO is bound by the performance specifications of the Service Contract to construct an additional two wells. However, ECO will be entitled to additional compensation for any pipeline that may be needed, plus some compensation for effort spent developing the two well sites from the original Service Contract that were unsuitable for full development. Staff will begin negotiations with ECO as soon as reasonably possible. Finalization of negotiations with ECO requires the location of the new wells and a determination of their yield. Staff has solicited proposals from two firms familiar with the Basin, and the GWRP project as a whole, to develop test wells and provide an estimate of well yields, along with a recommendation of preferred sites from the four sites under consideration. The proposals by the geotechnical consultants approach the evaluation of additional well site yields with two different methodologies. PSOMAS has worked for the SJBA to evaluate and monitor the amount of water in the basin and has produced annual reports on the issue. PSOMAS proposes to develop two test wells to measure the specific yield, the gallons per minute per foot of draw down of two of the sites, and use existing soil classification logs in conjunction with the new specific yield test results to estimate the potential production of the test well sites and adjacent well sites. PSOMAS proposes to perform its work for $90,300. Geotechnical Consultants Inc. (GTC) proposes to do four borings to classify the soil layers and use the soil classification and comparative analysis for an estimate of the potential ranges of productivity of the well sites. The GTC proposal will cost $38,000. GTC Inc. performed the 15 wells study for the City and provided oversight during ECO's construction and development of the GWRP wells. The process of well site selection is always somewhat risky, and the more information the staff has at hand, the probability of locating successful sites is enhanced. For this reason, staff recommends the more conservative approach proposed by PSOMAS over the method proposed by GTC, because the ability to actually have test flows will allow for a better evaluation of pumping potential. In addition, each developed test well site will be close enough to the second test site, allowing for each set of wells under Agenda Report • November 21, 2006 Page 3 consideration to provide a clear projection of the second site. The specific yield test is a more reliable indicator of well productivity than comparative analysis. The comparative analysis proposed by GTC requires a proximate well site with similar geology, a properly conducted specific yield test, and good soils classification of the sites. There is weakness in the data for both sets of the existing supplemental data for a straight comparative analysis. The methodology of PSOMAS will resolve this issue. COMMISSION/BOARD REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Water Advisory Commission reviewed this item at its meeting of September 26, 2006, and recommends the selection of PSOMAS. FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS: The GWRP budget, CIP No. 758, currently has a balance of $94,000 for FY 2006/2007 to cover the cost of PSOMAS' proposal. NOTIFICATION: PSOMAS GTC RECOMMENDATION: By motion, approve an agreement for the Assessment of Additional Ground Water Recovery Plant Well Sites with PSOMAS in the amount of $90,300, and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement. Respectfully submitted, Prepared by, `John W. Elwell, Eric Bauman, PE, Interim Public Works Director Water Engineering Manager Attachment: 1. Personal Services Agreement PERSONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of , 2006, by and between the City of San Juan Capistrano (hereinafter referred to as the "City") and PSOMAS, (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"). RECITALS: WHEREAS, City desires to retain the services of Consultant for the Assessment of Additional Ground Water Recovery Plant Well Sites; and WHEREAS, Consultant is qualified by virtue of experience, training, education and expertise to accomplish such services. NOW, THEREFORE, City and Consultant mutually agree as follows: Section 1. Scope of Work. The scope of work to be performed by Consultant shall consist of those tasks as set forth in Exhibit "A," Described as PSOMAS's Proposal to Install, Develop and Conduct a Production Test of Two Pilot Wells that will be used for Design of Production Wells for the City of San Juan Capistrano," dated September 20, 2006, attached and incorporated herein by reference. Consultant warrants that all of its services shall be performed in a competent, professional and satisfactory manner and in accordance with the prevalent standards of its profession. Section 2. Term. This Agreement shall commence on the effective date of this Agreement and services required hereunder shall be completed by no later 120 days from the date of Notice to Proceed. Section 3. Compensation. 3.1 Amount. Total compensation for the scope of services for this Project shall not exceed Ninety Thousand Three Hundred Dollars ($90,300.00) as set forth in Exhibit "A." 3.2 Rate Schedule. 1 ATTACHMENT The services shall be billed to the City at the hourly rate set forth in Exhibit "A," attached and incorporated herein by reference. Included within the compensation are all the Consultant's ordinary office and overhead expenses incurred by it, its agents and employees, including meetings with the City representatives and incidental costs to perform the stipulated services. Submittals shall be in accordance with Consultant's proposal. 3.3 Method of Payment. Consultant shall submit monthly invoices based on total services, which have been satisfactorily completed and specifying a percentage of projected completion for approval by the City. The City will pay monthly progress payments based on approved invoices in accordance with this Section. For extra work not part of this Agreement, a written authorization from City is required prior to Consultant undertaking any extra work. 3.4 Records of Expenses. Consultant shall keep complete and accurate records of all costs and expenses incidental to services covered by this Agreement. These records will be made available at reasonable times to City. Section 4. Independent Contractor. It is agreed that Consultant shall act and be an independent contractor and not an agent or employee of City, and shall obtain no rights to any benefits which accrue to City's employees. Section 5. Limitations Upon Subcontracting and Assignment. The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Consultant, its principals and employees were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Consultant shall not contract with any other entity to perform the services required without written approval of the City. This Agreement may not be assigned, voluntarily or by operation of law, without the prior written approval of the City. If Consultant is permitted to subcontract any part of this Agreement by City, Consultant shall be responsible to City for the acts and omissions of its subcontractor as it is for persons directly employed. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationships between any subcontractor and City. All persons engaged in the work will be considered employees of Consultant. City will deal directly with and will make all payments to Consultant. 2 Section 6. Changes to Scope of Work. In the event of a change in the Scope of Work provided for in the contract documents as requested by the City, the Parties hereto shall execute an addendum to this Agreement setting forth with particularity ail terms of the new agreement, including but not limited to any additional Consultant's fees. Section 7. Familiarity with Work and Construction Site. By executing this Agreement, Consultant warrants that: (1) it has investigated the work to be performed; (2) it has investigated the proposed construction site, including the location of all observable utilities, and is aware of all observable conditions there; and (3) it understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions of the work under this Agreement. Should Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions materially differing from those inherent in the work or as represented by City, it shall immediately inform City of this and shall not proceed with further work under this Agreement until written instructions are received from the City. Section 8. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. Section 9. Compliance with Law. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, codes and regulations of federal, state and local government. Section 10. Conflicts of Interest. Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of the services contemplated by this Agreement. No person having such interest shall be employed by or associated with Consultant. Section 11. Copies of Work Product. At the completion of the contract period, Consultant shall have delivered to City at least one (1) copy of any final reports and architectural drawings containing Consultant's findings, conclusions, and recommendations with any support documentation. All reports submitted to the City shall be in reproducible format. All services to be rendered hereunder shall be subject to the direction and approval of the City. 3 Section 12. Ownership of Documents. All reports, information, data and exhibits prepared or assembled by Consultant in connection with the performance of its services pursuant to this Agreement are confidential to the extent permitted by law, and Consultant agrees that they shall not be made available to any individual or organization without prior written consent of the City. All such reports, information, data, and exhibits shall be the property of the City and shall be delivered to the City upon demand without additional costs or expense to the City. The City acknowledges such documents are instruments of Consultant's professional services. City's reuse of such materials on a project other than the Recycled Water Supply System shall be at the City's sole risk. Section 13. Indemnity. Consultant agrees to protect, defend and hold harmless City, its elected and appointed officials and employees from any and all claims, liabilities, expenses or damages of any nature, including attorneys' fees, for injury or death of any person or damage to property or interference with use of property to the extent resulting form the negligent or other wrongful acts, errors and omissions committed by Consultant arising out of or in connection with the work, operation or activities of Consultant, its agents, employees and subcontractors in carrying out its obligations under this Agreement. Consultants liability hereunder shall be limited to the grater of Consultant's fee or $50,000. Section 14. Insurance. Insurance required herein shall be valid for a minimum of one year, or term of contract, whichever is longer, and it shall be provided by Admitted Insurers in good standing with the State of California and having a minimum Best's Guide Rating of A- Class VII or better. 14.1 Comprehensive General Liability. Throughout the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain in full force and effect Comprehensive General Liability coverage in the following minimum amounts: $500,000 property damage; $500,000 injury to one person/any one occurrence/not limited to contractual period, $1,000,000 injury to more than one person/any one occurrence/not limited to contractual period. If subject to a general aggregate, such aggregates shall be at least $1,000,000. 14.2 Comprehensive Automobile Liability. 4 Throughout the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain in full force and effect Comprehensive Automobile Liability coverage, including owned, hired and non- owned vehicles in the following minimum amounts: $500,000 property damage; $500,000 injury to one person/any one occurrence/not limited to contractual period; $1,000,000 injury to more than one person/any one occurrence/not limited to contractual period 14.3 Worker's Compensation. If Consultant intends to employ employees to perform services under this Agreement, Consultant shall obtain and maintain, during the term of this Agreement, Worker's Compensation Employer's Liability Insurance in the statutory amount as required by state law. 14.4 Proof of Insurance Requirements/Endorsement. Prior to beginning any work under this Agreement, Consultant shall submit the insurance certificates, including the deductible or self-retention amount, and an additional insured endorsement to the Consultant's general liability and umbrella liability policies to the City Clerk's office for certification that the insurance requirements of this Agreement have been satisfied. 14.5 Errors and Omissions Coverage Throughout the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain Errors and Omissions Coverage (professional liability coverage) in an amount of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000). Prior to beginning any work under this Agreement, Consultant shall submit an insurance certificate to the Clerk of the Board's office for certification that the insurance requirements of this Agreement have been satisfied. 14.6 Notice of Cancellation/Termination of Insurance. The above policy/policies shall not terminate, nor shall they be cancelled, nor the coverages reduced, until after thirty (30) days' written notice is given to City, except that ten (10) days' notice shall be given if there is a cancellation due to failure to pay a premium. 14.7 Terms of Compensation. 5 Consultant shall not receive any compensation until all insurance provisions have been satisfied. 14.8 Notice to Proceed. Consultant shall not proceed with any work under this Agreement until the City has issued a written "Notice to Proceed" verifying that Consultant has complied with all insurance requirements of this Agreement. Section 15. Termination. City and Consultant shall have the right to terminate this Agreement without cause by giving thirty (30) days' advance written notice of termination to the other party In addition, this Agreement may be terminated for cause by providing ten (10) days' notice to the other party of a material breach of contract. If the other party does not cure the breach of contract, then the agreement may be terminated subsequent to the ten (10) day cure period. Section 16. Notice. All notices shall be personally delivered or mailed to the below listed addresses, or to such other addresses as may be designated by written notice. These addresses shall be used for delivery of service of process: To City: City of San Juan Capistrano 32400 Paseo Adelanto San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Attn: Public Works Director To Consultant: PSOMAS 3187 red Hill Avenue Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Attn: John R. Thornton, Vice President/ Principal Section 17. Attorneys' Fees. If any action at law or in equity is necessary to enforce or interpret the terms of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees, costs and necessary disbursements in addition to any other relief to which he may be entitled. Section 18. Dispute Resolution. In the event of a dispute where the amount in controversy does not exceed the greater of the consultants fee or $50,000 arising between the parties regarding performance or interpretation of this Agreement, the dispute shall be resolved by 6 binding arbitration under the auspices of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Service ("JAMS"). Section 19. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding and agreement between the parties and supersedes all previous negotiations between them pertaining to the subject matter thereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement. CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO By: David M. Swerdlin, Mayor CONSULTANT By: �Az A k Jon R. Thornton, ice President/ Principal ATTEST: Margaret R. Monahan, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: John R. S j w, City Attorney 7 lnformatime and Eigmeemig Sohdiow September 20, 2006 Mr. Eric Bauman ,c,7'; 71 City of San Juan Capistrano 32400 Paseo Adelanto San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Re: Proposal to Install, Develop and Conduct a Production Test of Two Pilot Test Wells that will be used for Design of Production Wells for the City of San Juan Capistrano, California. Dear Mr. Bauman: Psomas is pleased to submit this proposal to install, develop and conduct a production test of two pilot wells in the City of San Juan Capistrano (CSJC), California. This proposal is based on your e-mail dated August 30, 2006 requesting test borings at the Ricardo and North Cooks well sites. In addition, CSJC requested a potential yield evaluation for two other sites referred to as MW-07 and South Cooks well sites. BACKGROUND In an effort to enhance groundwater production in the lower San Juan Creek groundwater basin, the CSJC is seeking suitable sites to expand existing production. Two potential sites have been selected and include a location near existing San Juan Basin Authority (SJBA) monitoring well MW-07 referred to as the Ricardo Well site and another well located near existing SJBA monitoring well MW-04. Psomas' understanding is that the CSJC wishes to develop test borings in these areas to evaluate the suitability of these sites for a full size production wells. In addition, the CSJC wishes to evaluate other sites in proximity to the existing SJBA monitoring wells (MW-07 & MW-04) to assess if these locations could be used as alternative production well locations. APPROACH Psomas has evaluated the existing conditions at each of these sites and preliminary indications are that high production zones may be present. However, the high production zones typically include high permeability zones composed of gravels, cobbles and boulders that create difficult drilling conditions for most conventional drilling technologies. 3187 Red Hill Avenue Suite 25R Costa Mesa,CA 92626 714 7517373 EXHIBIT "A" 714 945 8883 Fax w psomascom PSOMAS Proposal to Install, Develop and Conduct a Production Page 2 of 7 Test of Two Pilot Test Wells for City of San Juan Capistrano September 20, 2006 Most drilling technologies that are capable of advancing in these types of conditions typically use drilling fluids composed of bentonite. The use of bentonite generally requires extended development time to remove the drilling fluids in order to assess the true production capability of the zone being evaluated. Psomas proposes to advance the borings using an advanced drilling technology that does not use a circulating medium and can penetrate gravels, cobbles and boulders. The technique, RotaSonic, employs a high frequency vibration to the drilling shoe to advance an 8 to 10-inch casing. A continuous core of soil is extracted as the casing is advanced providing a good understanding of the geology and corresponding production capability of each zone encountered as the boring is progressed. Upon reaching the desired depth (bedrock), the boring can be abandoned or can be completed as a pilot test well to conduct further evaluations. Psomas proposes to complete the two test borings into 4 to 5-inch diameter pilot test wells and conduct a single well aquifer test using a submersible pump. Preliminary estimates (using a transmissivity of 45,000 gpd/ft) indicate that a 4 to 5-inch pilot test well would be capable of 100 gpm and should experience a drawdown of approximately 1-2 feet over a four hour test period (assuming a fully penetrating aquifer). The tests can be evaluated and calculations can be made concerning full scale production wells including anticipated drawdown and production rate. If the location is selected for a full scale production well, the pilot well could be used as a monitoring well during development and testing of the full scale production well. SCOPE OF SERVICES Task 1 —Well Permits and Mobilization Psomas will obtain well permits from the Orange County Environmental Health for the installation of the pilot test wells. The proposed well locations will be marked and Psomas will notify Underground Service Alert (USA) at least 48 hours prior to drilling. Task 2 — Well Installation and Development Psomas proposes to advance and install two pilot test wells at the locations indicated in Figures 1 & 2. The wells will be advanced using a truck-mounted Rota-Sonic drill rig. Formation samples will be collected continuously for purposes of describing the local soils and geology.and will be logged in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. PSOMASW MP Proposal to Install, Develop and Conduct a Production Page 3 of 7 Test of Two Pilot Test Wells for City of San Juan Capistrano September 20, 2006 Pilot Test Wells will be constructed based on the following criteria: Ricardo Test Well • 4-inch diameter schedule 40 PVC flush-threaded casing • 40 feet of 4-inch diameter schedule 40 PVC screen with 0.02 slot (actual slot size will be evaluated at the time of well completion) • Flush mount completion in a traffic-rated well box North Cook Test Well • 4-inch diameter schedule 40 PVC flush-threaded casing • 40 feet of 4-inch diameter schedule 40 PVC screen with 0.02 slot (actual slot size will be evaluated at the time of well completion) • Flush mount completion in a traffic-rated well box The newly installed pilot test wells will be developed immediately following installation. The pilot test wells will be developed by a combination of bailing, swabbing, airlifting and/or purging with an electric submersible pump. Development will continue until field parameters stabilize (less than 10% change from previous reading) and the discharge is visually free of suspended solids or 3 hours of development, which ever occurs first. During well development procedures, groundwater field parameters consisting of pH, electrical conductivity (EC), dissolved oxygen (DO), temperature in degrees Celsius (°C) and turbidity will be monitored with field instruments. Task 3—Aquifer Test Psomas proposes to conduct a single well aquifer test on each of the pilot test wells. Preliminary calculations indicate that at a production rate of 100 gpm and a transmissivity of 45,000 gpd/ft, the pilot test well should indicate a 1-2 feet decline over approximately 4 hours. Depending on the rate of decline and the ultimate decline, a transmissivity for the underlying production zone can be approximated. The results coupled with the geology and depth to bedrock can be used to assess the production rate and preliminary design of a full scale production well. In addition, Psomas will collect a water sample during the aquifer test to assess the general water quality characteristics of the water produced during the aquifer test. Table 1 present a list of the proposed parameters/constituents and analytical method to be performed on the water sample collected from each well. PSOMAS Proposal to Install, Develop and Conduct a Production Page 4 of 7 Test of Two Pilot Test Wells for City of San Juan Capistrano September 20, 2006 TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES FOR VARIOUS PARAMETERS Pilot Test Wells for CSJC Type of Analysis Analytical Method General Minerals(Na,R, Ca,Mg) EPA 200.7 Total Dissolved Solids EPA 160.1 Bicarbonate/Carbonate SM 2320B Alkalinity Total Hardness as CaCO3 SM 23408 Chloride,Nitrate as N, EPA 300.0 Sulfate Boron 200.8 Fluoride SM 4500-F C Dissolved Metals(As.Ba, Be,Cd,Cr,Cu,Fe,Pb,Hg, EPA 200.8 Mn,Ni,Se,Ag,Th,V,Zn) Hexavalent Chromium EPA 218.6 Task 4— Data Analysis Following completion of aquifer testing activities, the data collected will be reduced and analyzed and transmissivity will be developed for aquifer at the pilot test well. A preliminary design and expected production capacity of a full scale production well will be assessed from the data collected. In addition, Psomas will evaluate the existing reports for wells MW-7 and MW-4 to assess the viability of these locations for production wells. Task 5 — Pilot Well Test Report Following completion and analysis of the aquifer test on each of the Pilot Test wells, a report will be prepared that presents the methodologies employed and results of the installation and testing of the Pilot Test wells. The report will include boring logs, testing procedures and results, and a summary of the expected production capacity of a full scale production well at an adjacent location. In addition, the report will include a preliminary design and expected PSOMAS Proposal to Install, Develop and Conduct a Production Page 5 of 7 Test of Two Pilot Test Wells for City of San Juan Capistrano September 20, 2006 production capacity of a full scale production well along with a recommended drilling method for completing the proposed production well. SCHEDULE Following notice to proceed, the proposed scope of work could be completed in approximately 3 months. Table 2 presents the anticipated time requirements for each of the proposed tasks. TABLE 2 TIME REQUIREMENTS BY TASK Pilot Test Wells for CSJC Item Time Requirements Task 1 — Well Permits and Mobilization 20 days Task 2 — Well Installation and Development 15 days Task 3 —Aquifer Testing 5 davs Task 4—Data Analysis 10 days Task 5 —Pilot Well Testing Report 20 days Mobilization to the field will be dependent on acquisition and approval of the well permits. Delays in approval or changes to the anticipated scope of work may have an impact on the overall schedule. COST ESTIMATE The proposed scope of work will be conducted on a time and materials basis with an estimated total cost of$90,300. A breakdown of the cost by individual task is included in Table 3. TABLE 3 SUMMARY OF COSTS BY TASK SKIC Well Installation and Quarterly Monitoring TASK COST Task 1 — Well Permitting & Mobilization $5,400 Task 2 — Well Installation and $51,500 Development Task 3 — Aquifer Test $10,900 Task 4 —Data Analysis $10,300 Task 5— Pilot Test Well Report $12,200 TOTAL $90,300 PSOMAS Proposal to Install, Develop and Conduct a Production Page 6 of 7 Test of Two Pilot Test Wells for City of San Juan Capistrano September 20, 2006 LIST OF ASSUMPTIONS The following assumptions were used in developing the schedule and associated cost estimate for this project. 1. Psomas and its subcontractors will be given unencumbered access to the proposed pilot test well locations. 2. No encroachment permits or access agreements are required to drill, install, and test the proposed pilot test wells. 3. Traffic control is not required as part of the proposed work. 4. Onsite work activities are not delayed by CSJC or others. 5. The advancement and completion of proposed pilot test wells takes no more than 2 days. 6. A roll-off bin for the containment of drill cuttings will be deployed at the site. The cuttings will be disposed of at a local landfill as non-hazardous waste. . 7. Development and Aquifer Test water will be contained in a Baker Tank at the site. The CSJC will be responsible for disposition of the water. A total of 30 days rental has been budgeted for two Baker Tanks. S. A total of 2 water samples will be collected and analyzed for the parameters listed in Table 1. 9. All field activities will occur during normal working hours (7:00 am-7:00 pm) Monday through Friday. 10. Final Pilot Test Well Report will include a discussion of the well construction and testing activities, site location map, and table of the laboratory analytical results. The report will also include a preliminary design and recommended drilling methods for the full scale production well proposed for the various locations. The report will also include as appendices: laboratory reporting forms, chain of custody forms, boring logs, aquifer testing results, and field sampling forms. PSOMAS Proposal to Install, Develop and Conduct a Production Page 7 of 7 Test of Two Pilot Test Wells for City of San Juan Capistrano September 20, 2006 11. One draft report will be submitted for one round of review by CSJC. Following CSJC review, the report will be finalized and five (5) copies of the final report will be submitted to CSJC. All work will be performed in accordance with the attached agreement which is included and made part of this proposal. We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal and took forward to working with you on this project. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, PS OMAS }eh R. Thornton, P.E. V!/ Michael P. Donovan, R.G., C.Hg. Principal and Vice President Senior Hydrogeologist Attachments aeWareral M:pgpNr) �Fv�,a'`"' rQ� F�H1 R�cerpo iianor.mr ; tiµ •.. '��: l .*.. PL ".,, :�. .F,.F, ✓.''`'S p0.,7'i" h' b"'T R MW-05 'x' { Y. 1 /„'n - xl. � :`l ., '• fir. North Cook F Vtj- t t e n s k .l, -t�i > W 94 --.m. 3—y9+aa - +r J _ .._.• s South Cooks r,alf ,I. � � � per. �r•� (a Y✓ , _ < lM° r ♦ .'Lys C{ ° E C, 1'T” c ^� a 'v p°- , qx .ft r� aa Mµyd N s n� t V- 1,Tirador w �s., i��Ci.* ,,,_ q ry �•,aYa.+",�, -, 4'.hy,` 'tsMi� 1 '�4x�xr � :ysy,{;F ,•° 1 ✓� 4• $P,' p£} {r , yht "+ • �•• °'x v$ 4Yµ"� ^�tl , r ffzs (� r roPosetl New Pibt Test P e I Desylter Well Well ® Nt °Posep New lM1htl 9/20/06 Proposed Pil Location- ot Test Wetls North Cooks Site coslemase2blofatlq M:@agNl]OLIAFIgt R'rcartlo OenceM1aY � Hollywood 2A ►'..A : �; �•�`' �'�`�7y����� Mission Street r�• —'�.o ��++��''• I�IF�;,- -Y1.Y y, Ricardoy i N MW-07 IS 41 � Oil j,�)y ,E-1 Y I$ R II f 191 f1 � f � a �•" � �+,e,. '^I ! 1111 I 'y `I•, .� ./*/ ^. 1 •�,��. £ A J _ Jj Dance Half lit rt �a�a�.I 'sf .° t ;'',e• a of r z;; n v. l `-- A {.�{'�• .li:� w Y It.i� i rW"'i/ �! !' f � �fl .. b+l ai - - '�59kX tilNit O Existing Production Well Q Proposetl New Pilot Test Well ® Existing Monitoring Well A Phase I Desalter Well ® Proposed New Well Evaluation Site Proposed Pilot Test Well gizoios Location-Ricardo Site FIGURE 1 • aIwo � • 32400 PASEO ADELANTO MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO,CA 92675 (949)493-1171 - SAM ALLEVATO (949)493-1053 FAX ninpa AAiF4 DIANE BATHGATE V 6TPAlfiXFO �AB� WYATT HART W W w..sunjuancapi.vtrano.org 1776 JOE SOTO • • DAVIDM SWERDLIN NOTIFICATION OF MEETING OF POTENTIAL INTEREST OF THE SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO CITY COUNCIL The City Council of San Juan Capistrano will meet at 7:00 p.m. on November 21, 2006 in the City Council Chamber in City Hall, to consider: "Consideration of Agreement for the Assessment of Additional Ground Water Recovery Plant Well Sites (PSOMAS) (CIP #758)" — Item No. D4. If you have specific thoughts or concerns regarding this item, you are encouraged to participate in this decision making process. You can communicate with the City Council through correspondence addressed to the Council and/or by attending the meeting and speaking to the Council during the public meeting. Correspondence related to this item must be received at the City Clerk's office by 5:00 p.m. on Monday, November 20, 2006 to allow time for the Council to consider its content. If you would like to speak at the meeting, please complete a yellow "Request to Speak" form found inside the entrance to the Council Chamber. This form is turned in at the staff table, just in front of the Council dais. You will be called to speak by the Mayor when the item is considered. You have received this notice at the request of the City staff member Eric Bauman, P.E., Water Engineering Manager. You may contact that staff member at (949).949- 487-4312 with any questions. The agenda, including agenda reports, is available to you on our web site: www.sanauancai)istrano.org. If you would like to subscribe to receive a notice when agendas are posted to the web site, please make that request by sending an e-mail to: council-agendasesanivancapistrano.org. Meg Monahan, CMC City Clerk cc: PSOMAS; GTC; John Elwell, Interim Director of Public Works; Eric Bauman, P.E., Water Engineering Manager Received staff report San Juan Capistrano: Preserving the Past to Enhance the Future (�Printed on 100%Recycled Paper 32400 PASEO ADELANTO %, J MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO,CA 92675 i Ibi-!, SAM! f I IAfXAvoAAiFX LEVATO (849)493-1171 DIANE BATHG ATE (949)493-1053 FAX ESIAXLISXfA 1961 WYATT HART www.sanjuanc apistrano.org 1776 JOE SOTO • • DAVID M.SWERDLIN November 27, 2006 NOTIFICATION OF ACTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO On November 21, 2006, the City Council of San Juan Capistrano met regarding: "Consideration of Agreement for the Assessment of Additional Ground Water Recovery Plant Well Sites (PSOMAS) (CIP #758)" Item No. D4. The following action was taken at the meeting: Personal Services Agreement with PSOMAS, for the assessment of additional Ground Water Recovery Plant well sites, in the amount of $90,300 approved; and the Mayor authorized to execute the agreement, approved; Soto/Bathgate, 5-0 The following documents are in the process of being executed: n/a If you have any questions regarding this action, please contact Eric Bauman, P.E., Water Engineering Manager at 949-487-4312 for more detailed information. Thank you, Meg Monahan, CMC City Clerk Cc: PSOMAS; GTC; John Elwell, Interim Director of Public Works; Eric Bauman, P.E., Water Engineering Manager San Juan Capistrano: Preserving the Past to Enhance the Future C�j Punted on 100%Recycled Paper