09-0518_KEETON KREITZER CONSULTING_Personal Services AgreementRERSONAL SE IF VICEIS AGREIEIMEINII
I IF IS AGRBEM91� T is n ade, entered into, and shall becom a effective this ��day
of N ay , 2001, by and betyie en the City oil cla n Juan Capistiiano (hereinaflen ne-lenned to a s
tt a "Clity") and k aeton Kneitzen Consulting (heiie in afleii neilerned to as the "Consultant").
REICIITAL SI:
WF9FIBAE-1, City desi les to retain tt a services of Consultant to prep ane the Draft
Bnvironmental Impact Rep ont (OBIR) floe tt a proposed ❑istrito La � ovia-San Juan
Meadows development p noject; and,
VI F BREIAS, Clonsultant is qUa lifie d by virtue of e)ipenienae, tnaining, a ducation and
expertise to accomplish sua t services.
� OVk , IIF EIRBFCIRB, City and Clonsullant mutually agree as follov+is:
Seciian 'I. Saape ail Wank.
I It a scope of work to be perfonmed t )l Cons ultant shall consist of those tas M s asset
lonth in B)ihibit "A," atla ched and inconporated hells in t )I relenence. To the extent tt at there
are any conflicts It etween the provisions described in Bxhit it "A" and those proN[is ions
contained oiitt in this Agreement, the pro �iision s in this Aglneernent shall aontnol.
Sectiari 2. Term.
This Agnee ment shall aommenaa on the effective date and s t all terminate, and all
services required hereunden shall be cc mpleted, no later than June 30, 2010.
Seciian 3. Clomipensatian.
3.'I Amcwnil.
TolaI compensation fon tt a services hereunder shall not exceed $232,895
(two-hundned and thiry-tv+io thousand, eight -t undrad and ninet�l five dollans and no cents)
as set for t in ELihibit "E," attached and incorporated herein by ne flenence.
3.2 Method cif Raymieni.
flubject to fleclion 3.1, Consultant shall subm it monthly invoices based on
total services which ha Nie been satisfactorily completed fat suat monthly pe niod. The City
will pay monthly pnogress payme nts based on ap p noved in) ioices in accordance mlith this
Section and as set ilorth in Exhibit "Cl", attached and inaonporated t enein by nelenence.
3.3 Recauds cif Elxperi ses.
Clonsultant s t all keep complete and accurate neconds o-1 all costs and
expenses incidental to services aovened t y this;Iglueement. these records will be made
availat le a1 reasonat Is limes to Clil�l.
Seciliian 4. lndepencenl Canlracicin.
11 is agreed Thal Clon s ultanl shall act and be an indepa ndenl c oni nac ton and no'l an
aglent or employlee of City, and shall obtain no righls 'lo any benefils which aaarue io City's
employees.
Secticin 5. Urni-lalicins Upon Subcanivacling and Assignmien'l.
The experience, knowledgle, capat ilily and repula,lion of Consultant, its pnincipals
and employees wells a SLibstantial inducement toil City to en'len into this AIgneemani.
Clonsultant al all not contnaci with any o'lhen entily to perlonrn tt a services ra quNed wilt out
wnillen approval of the Cliiy. This Agneement may not be assigned, voluntarily on by
openalion of law, wilhoui the prion wnillen approval o-l-Iha (Ii-ly. I -I Consul la nt is permitted to
subcon tnacl an y par of this AIgneement by City, Clonsultant shall be nespon 3 it le to City floe
the acts and orn isaions of its subcontnactoii as it is for gersons directly employled. IN oihing
contained in tt is Agneement shall cneate any con-lractual relationships between anti
subconlraaton and Clit�l. All pemons engaged in the wont will be considened ern ployees of
ConSLilta nt. Clity will deal dinectly with and will mal a all payments to Consulta n1.
aecliain 6. Chancres 1ci Sccipe cif Wank.
Fou extra wonk not part of tt is Agnea ment, a written authorization fnom City is
requhad prion to Clonsultant undertaking an51 extua wank. In the e�ienl of a cha%e in tt e
Scope o1\A onk provided loll in the contnact documents as nequesta d by the Clit)l, tt a Rariies
t eneto at all e)iecute an addendum to this Flgneement setting for t with particula nity all terms
ofl the new agreement, including but not limited to any additional Clonsultant's lees.
Seclicin 7. Familiarity with Work andlcir Canalnucilian Sille.
By e)iecuting It is Agreement, Clonsultant wannants that: ('I) it has imiestigaled the
wonk -lo t e perfonmed; (2) i l aq plica ble, it has investigate d the woil site(s ), and is awane o-1
all conditions thene; and (3) it undenstands tt a llacilities, difficulties and iiestnictions of the
wonk to to performed tinder this Agreement. Should Consultant discover anal latent on
unknomin condition s materia Ill diffening Irom thos a in heiien t in the wonk oil as repuesented
by City, it shall in mediatel)I inform tt e City of this and shall not pnoceed witt lura en wort
unden tt is plgreema nt until written instruation s are neceived fnom tt e City.
aedlian 8. Mime cif E ssence.
lin a is o-1 tt a essenae in the g er1 ormance of this Agreement.
2
Ele clion 9. Clorr pliana a will Law; HA a nify.
9.1. Clampliance with Law.
Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ondinan a a s, a odes and regulations
of iedenal, state and local gloveimment.
9.7. 9-Venicy.
If (]on sultant is not already enrolled in the U .El. ❑en arc ment oil homeland Elea unity's
Ei-Verify pnognam, Consultant shall enroll in tl a EI-� eniiy pnognam within -liflean days o l tl e
e ftective date oil this Agnea ment to verify the emn for Iment authorization ofl new emplo)IQ es
assigned to per orm work hereunder. Cion sultant s l all verify employme nt authorisation
Witt in three days o-1 hi iin g a new emn lo)iee to perform wort unde i this Agreement.
Inilormation pertaining to the EIA eriily progiiam can be found at http://wwMi.uscis.gov, ori
access the iegistuation page at httr)s://wwv.Njis-(Ihs.com/a mplove inegishation . (]on sultant
shall cer ify its negistiia tion with EIA a nifty and provide its negis tration number +mitt in sbiteen
days ofl the eililective date o1 this Agmement. Failure to pnovide cc rliilication will result in
withholdingl payment until frill compliance is demonstrated.
fleclion 14. Clanflicils all Inlenes-l.
Consultant ao)ie nants that it presently I as no interest and shall not acquiva an)I
interest, (linect on indirect, which woUkl con-llict in any manners on degnee with the
performance o-1 the services contemplated b)I this Agree ment. No person hariing such
intenest s1 all be employed bll on associated with Consultant.
Sectian 'I'I. Copies cif Wark Flriaduct.
At the corn pletion o-lthe wort, Glons Ultant shall I a pie clelhia ned to City at le ast one (1)
copy o-1 an) I sinal nen oris and/on notes ou drawings containing Clonsultant's -lindin gs,
conclusions, and recommendations with any supporting doaUmentation. All neporis
I iibmitted to the City s I all I: a in repnodiicit le format, or in the fonmat off erwise appno) ied by
the City in waiting.
Elea Iicin 12. Clwnership of llacuments.
Pill nepor s, inimmation, data and exhibits peeganed on assembled by Const Itant in
conne ction with the perfoima nce oil its s e rvices punsuan t to tl is Agree ment ane conftden Tial
to the extent permitted b)I law, and (]on s tiitant agrees that they shall not be a ade available
to an )I individual or ongan ization without pnion written consent o-1 the Clit)l. All such iepor s,
inlionmation, data, and exhibits shall be the piopeity oIthe Clity and shall be deiivened to the
City upon demand without addition I costs on expense to t1 e Clint. The City acknowledges
such clocuma nts are instnurn ents of Clonsultant's processional services.
3
Seal icor 13. Inc emnity.
-Rothe Dille; t ex ent penrnitted by la Jnr, Conslllta nt agriee: to protect, defend, and hold
harmless the Clity and its elective and appointive boands, offiaens, agents, and employee:
ilrorn any and all claims, Iia bilities, expenses, on dama ges of any nature, including attorneys'
flee: , fon injuny on death of any pe nson, on damages of any n atone, including interfenenae
with use oil property, auising out ol, on in anll way connected with the negligenae,
nec} less ness and/on intentional wironc ful conduct of Clon s uitant, Consultant's agents,
offiaens, employees, subcon tnactons, on independent can tnactons t fined by Consultant in tt e
perlonrn ance o l the Ague ement. 7t a only exception to Consultant's nes ponsit ility to piiotect,
defend, and hold harmless the City, is clue to the negllige rice, necklessness an d/on wrion gful
conduct of the City, on any oil its elective or appointive board: , officers, agents, on
employees.
This hold haumles: agueement ; t all apply to all liabilitll regardless of wt ether any
in s crnana o policies aue app licat le. The policy limits do not act as a limitation Upon the
a mount oil indemni'lication to be pnovided by Consultant.
Sealicrn 14. Instrnance.
Cln on before beginninc any of the services on wool called fon bll any term of tt is
Agneernient, Con! ultant, at its own cost and expen: a, st all carry, maintain -lor the dunation
oil tt a agreement, and pnovide prooil tt a neol that is aaaeptable to the Clity, the ins unance
specified below with insunens and unden fonms o-1 insuua nce satisfactory in all nespects to -Ihe
City. Clonsultant ; t all noel allow any suboontnaoton to comm ence wool on any suboonluaot
until all insuna nce nequined oltt a Clonsultant ha: also been ob-lained loll the subcontractor.
Insurance nequinecl t enein sha 11 be p novided by Admitted In suners in good standing with the
EItate of Clalifomia and t avia g a min imum Best's Guide Rating) of A- Class VII or betton.
,14.01 Clarniprehensiue General Liability.
It nougt out the to nm o'l this Agneem ent, Consullan I shall mainta in in full Ionce
and effect Clomprehen;ive Genenal Liability coverage in an amount not le:: ilhan one
million dollars: pen occurnence ($1,000,04 0.00), comt in ed single limit covenage loll risks
associated with the wonir contemplated t11 this agreement. If a Commeaciai Genenal
I. iability InsLrnance foam on ott en form witt a general aglgnegate limit is used, eitt en the
genera I aglgnegate limit s t a II app Ill separately to the vionk to be per onmed un der this
agreement on tt a general aggaec ale limit st all be al least twice tt a uequined occuurence
limit.
014.2 Ccrmrpnehensive Aullomiobile LiaHHill N.
Thaoughocit tt a tenni of tt i; Agao ement, (]On s Lilta nt shall maintain in full IlDaCe
and effect Clomprehensive Automobile Liability am ienage , including owned, tined and "on -
owned vet iales in an amount not less than one mullion dollars pen occurnence
($1,000,000.00).
4
V.3 Warken's Clarnipensalion.
II Clonsultant intends to employ employees to per onm services Sinden this
Agreement, Clonsultant shall obtain and maintain, diming the term of this plgneemeni,
\Alonker's Compensation Employer's Liability Ins unance in the statutory amount as nequined
by state law.
14.4 Riiaaf ail Insunance Requiiie mienls,lEnc ansemie nil.
Rnion to beginning any wonk under tt is Agneern ent, Clonsultant shall submit the
insurance cer ificates, including tt a deductible on sell -retention amount, and an additional
insured endorsement naming City, its offiaens, employees, agents, and volunteers as
additional insuneds as respects each oil the hollowing: Liability arising out of activities
perfonmed t )I or on behall oil Clonsultant, including tt a insured's geneiial supervision of
Consultant; products and aompleted op enation s a 1 Cla nsultant; pnemises owned, occupied
of used t 51 Clonsultant; on automobiles owned, leased, hired, on borrowed b)l Clonsultant.
llt a coverage shall contain no spea ial limitations on the scope oil pna tection affonded Clit)l,
its offiaa ns, employees, agents, an volunta ens.
I� A N allice of Clancelialian/llenminatian all Insurance.
llt a above policy/policies shall not tenminate, non s t all tt ey be cancelled, non
the covenagles nedUced, until a-lten thirt y (30) clays' written notice is given to City, except that
ten ( 10) clays' notice shall be given iilthene is a cancellation clue to ilailune to Ray a q nemium.
11 .6 7e nrnis of Clarnipensal lan.
Consultant shall not receive any compensation Until all insurance provisions
I ave been satis-lied.
14.7 Natice to Pnoceec .
Clonsultant at all not gnoceed witt any work unden this Agreement until the
Clit51 has issUed a wnitten " N otiae to Rra ceed" venifyingl tt at Clonsultant has comp tied with all
in surance regluinern ents of tt is AIgneeme nt.
Eleclian 15. Termiinalicin.
Clit}I shall have the rigt t to tenminate this Aglneernent without cause b)l glNing thir )I
(3( ) dads' advance written notiae oil termination to Clonsultant.
In addition, this Agreement may be to nminated by anal nary -Ion cause t )I providing
ten (10) days' notiae to the other par )I o1 a ma tenial breach of contiaat. 111 he other party
does not cuve the bneach of contract, then tt e a gneern ent may be terminated subsequent to
the len (10) clay cute period.
5
Secl ion 18. R al ice.
All notices shall be pensonally delivered on ma ile d to the t elow listed addresses, or
to such other addnesses as may be des ign ated by vinitten notice. It ( se addnes se s 91 a II be
used ion delivery of service of pnocess:
7a C it)1: C it)l of flan Juan C a pistnano
32404 Flaseo Adelanto
Sa n Juan C an istnano, C A 92675
Flttn:
To C onsultant: k e eton Kneitzen, Rnincipal
k e eton Kneitzen Consulting
'1729'1 Irvine Eloule�iand, Shiite 345
Mustin, Cpl 99 780
Secllian '17. A111onneys' Fees.
I -I any action at lama on inequity is neaessary to enforce or interpret the terms of this
Agreement, the q nevailing par y shall t e entitled to neason able attorneys' -lee s, costs and
necessary (list unsern ents in addition to a ny othen nelie l to which he rn ay be a ntitled.
Seolian '18. Dispute Re; alutian.
In the event of a dispUte a i ising between the parties regan(lin g q er onmanae on
intenpne tation of this Agreement, the dispUte shall be i esolved by binding anbitnation unden
tt a auspices of the Judicial AIrbitnation and N ediation Service ("JAMS").
Sec1!an 19. Ontine Apneement.
This AI ieernent constitutes the en6 a understanding and ag ieern ent bete een tt e
garlies and sun eisedes all pievious negotiations between them per aining to the subject
rn atte the eoil.
[SKIN AIIL REI RAGEI FOLLCIWS]
D
IN WIIIN 13%c E WHE RBOF, the panties hereto have executed this Agneement.
CITY OF � AN JL PIN CAME IRAN O
8y: Q$�v.-� (�n�rw`_
Dave Adan s, Clit)l Manag en
CION SL LIIAN Il
m
AFIRROVB❑ A; W FORK:
CAI,� (�
4 r -
City AttorneyJ 1
Beta n N neitzeu, Principal
Beton N neitzei Clonsu1,in � )
Exhibit A, H eeton Kneitzen Clonsulting Pnoposal to Raen ane the ❑milt E nvinonrn ental Imn act
Repa r {081R} -Ion Dis tnito La N a via a n Juan h eadows .
Exhibit 8, Rate .� of edule.
8xhibit Cl, Ra)ln ent -Ion � ervices Schedule.
7
RROPOSAU FOR 1HE PRBPAIRAITICIIN OF A DRART
DRART ENVIRICINMEP TAIL IMPACT RIERCIRIT
QRIEV ISED]
DISTRITO LA NOVIAISAN JL AN MHAWW'I RRCIJEC7
SAN JL AIN WOMAN CI, CA
IN TROOL UTION
Keeton Kreitzer Clonsulting (KK(I) regards tt a environmental review process as a critiaal one beaause it a
project is ever gloing to I: a alallangacl, it will It a clone so first through the environmental re\flevi groaass.
Ilue to tta nature of the proposed project and tte potential for significant eff eats upon tle existing
enriironment wherein the project is laaated, it is important that an environmerstaI impact report (EIR) be
prepared that adequatel)l and ttaraughly addresses the issues that may be identified It the Cit)l (if San
.Dian Clapistrano at stial time as the initial stUdy is prepared for proposed Distrito I. a Navia/San Juan
Meadows Project.
In accordance with Section 15111 of the Clalifarnia Environmental CiLialitrl Act (CEQAI) Guidelines, a
"project" EIR will be prepared I )I KKCI tt at will anal71ze the approval oil the discretionary aations requested
by the project applicant in order to implement tt a proposed project to enUire tl at eaat of tt a significant
issues that m a )l be identified I in the initial study when it is prepared are tl a rot iglt Iy and adequatel)l
addressed. Als indicated in tt a Request far Proposa I (RFP), tt a discretionary approvals requested b`l tt e
project applicant include: (1) Flral itectural Clontrol (FIC) for tt a preliminary site, architectural and related
development plans; (2) General Plan Amendment for 8 A acres of the 17.9 -aa re site from "Planned
( lorarn Li n ity" to SP/PR: Specific PlanlPrecis a Plan;" (3) Reaa ne of tt a same 8.4 a a re s from "P(I" to
SP/PP: Specific Plan/Precise Plan," inclLicling an amandment to the Forster Clanyon PCI's Clornpret ensbia
DeNielopment Plan to delete those Ei .4 acres; (4) Tentative -batt Map; and (5) Landfill Cllosure Plan. Tt e
analysis included in the project Clraft EIR will address potential impacts associated witt the speailid
disaretionary a(itions identiilied above ttat are necessary to implement tte proposed project. Ward
necessary, appropriate m itigla tion measures 3t all be recommendo d to reduce potential impacts to a less
tt an siglnilicant level.
Tt a consultant team assembled by KKCI is aware of the significance of this project. The draft EIR
pre pared t y KKCI will analyze the project acaardinglil to enSUre tt at each of tt a significant is: ues isle ntillied
t y the Clity and in tt a initial study are tt ora lig t Iy a n d a dequatel)l addressed. As presented in tt e scope of
work that 11ollawis, wie Lave presented a step-by-step approach to respond to tte mandated envronmental
reNiiew process. Cloorclinatiors witt the San Juan (lapistrano Planning Department staff and tett nical
consultants is also a siglnilicant element a l the scope a I viarl proposed by KKCI. Finally, KKC also
red a gln izes tt a need to meet with the City and the corn rn L in ity as an integral component of the
anvronmental review process to prauide neaessary sLipport to tte San Juan Capistrano Planning
Elepartment wt an describing tt a need for, as v ie II as tt a nature and extent of, tt a environmental analysis
to be undertaken. Clther important components of the scrape of work include the preparation of several
teat n ical s tidies, attendance at public hearingla, and completion of the required findings and other related
doa urn ents to support tt a envirors rn e n to l anal)lsis .
11he scope ofl the Graft EIR cannot t e precisely determined until the initial stud+l is completed so it is not
possible to accuratel)l identify tt a natHre and extent of the potential environmental issues that viauld be
addressed in tt a EIA. Iherellore, the proposal that follows reflects our understanding g of tt a g roje a t and
our )iiew of the issues associated witt the development of an industrial part business center on tte
existing projeat site in tl a Cit)l o,l San Juan Clapistrano. Itis imparta nt to note that, if necess ar)l, the stage
of viarl will t e finalised upon completion of tt a initial study and/or folloviing the scoping meeting
conduated by tt a Cit}l.
AFICIPCISAL FORE NVIRCINMEATAL CIOASICILTINGI SIEFIVICIE:51
CIISTAITCIU AMA,EIAA JIIAN MEA30A,1IFIROJECI7 —SAM JUNI CIAPISIIFIANO, CA
SCOPE OF SUR% ICISS
As indicates I ata pie, the scope of s o niices for ti a Draft Rn Aronmental Impact Req a rt (lira ft EI FI)
c omprises se)ia ra I dis c rete Rto p s tt a t im p lement L oth tt a State a n d City of San Juan Clapis tra r a and
Clalifornia Environmental Quality Act (CIEQEI) Guillotines. The major objective to ke act ieved is the
a ertif ica tion of the Draft EIR ttat will require the implementation of several tas1, s to be undertaken that
inch isle, but not limits cl to, tt a folla win 9: (1) projea t manag e rn e nt an (I coordin a tion; (2) q repa ratio n of
to c hnica I studies; (I ) preparatia n of the Dra ft EIA; (4) EIR proces s ing and pt it lic partia ipation ; (5)
preparation of the Rinal EI FI; and (6) preparation of the legal c loo timents tt at support t[ a Final EIR,
in cludin gl tt a lv itigatia n lv onitorin g Program, Findings of Fact, and Staters a nt a f Overriding Consideration,
if n e cess a rr 1. Rail work ta: k to be tin de rla l, en is identiflied and described cribed below.
Tail One - Project Management
Project management will t e an integral part of t[ a planning process. FIs a result, tt is task will involve
management and ca a rclination of all work to be undertaken to prepare the Draft EIR. In order to or cure
that v tori associated wit[ tt a preparation ofl tt a Draft EIR is p ra g re ssin gl in accordance Witt tt a schedule,
meetings as clots rm ined n e cess a rel will t e ea nductecl that include representatives of the EIR consultant,
project applicant, City of San ,l ua n Clapistrana , and/or atter agencies I acing an interest in tl a propos a d
project. Speciflicall)l, this tail, will accommodate up to three (3) suet meetings. In addition, PKCI will also
attend one (1) scoping meetingl aanductecl i )I the Clity llor the proposed project. It is important to note tt at
the s cope a f wa rl, may be m a di'lied as a result of the issues and conce rr s isle nti lied during tt a NOP
revievi period and/or public input received at tl a scoping rnaeting. Should such modifications to
necessary, a revised budget and s cope will t e prepared and Rut mittec l to t[ a Citi for approval.
Tte remainder ofl this tasty encompasses day -to -dal project management and aoordinatian necessaryto
complete the environmental analysis. The KK CI projo a t mar ager will coordinate the work of lorts of tl e
individual tecl rr tcal ca n s ultantR to o n sure that their worl, address v the is s ties icier tified in tt o initial s tudy
and in NOP comments. In addition, lition, tt a entire viorl, effort will be can ducted p urs tia nt to Pe Cit}I's
environmental review p roa e s s. /Is a result, close co a rdination wit[ tl a Cit)i's project manager will be
n e a esti a ry .
In summary, this task will include;
• Managle m e n t and s tip ervis ion of tt a EIR const iltant team and project applicant
con R tiltants to ensure that tt a to chnio a l studies prepared for 1:1 a project are adequate ;
• C to a rc lination o l t[ a proposed project and environmental c la a ument Witt the Citi a fl San
Juan Clapistrana staff to ensure t[ at City policy is relllected in the Uraft RIR;
• Cons siltation wit/ tt o Gtr 1 of San Juan Clapistrana s tafl and otl er resp o n s ible ag e n cies a s
determined necessary; and
• Attendance at tip to three (3) meetings viith Clity stafil and tle consultant team and
attendance atone (1) � copin gl meeting.
ilrapa;r of for ani urann ental Cana 0thig Service s
Distrito i a Na viaif9 an Ji iari Ales cki ws Prnja ct — Se +i Joan Capia trano, CA
April ia, IOd8
PAOFIOEh I FCIR E NWICINM EA T) l CION I(IL LTIPI C -I l IERVlCIE S (AEVIEIE DI
31STAITCI L/ AOL1L M1XEL1 USIA PR0,IECIT— EV A JU) A CAFIISTAF NO, CIF
Estimated Mini e Frame: FIs Re q Mired
Estimated Budget: $5,520.00
Task -Iwo — Preparation of tt a Initial StudvlNotice of Preparation (NCIP
KKCI will prepare the initial stud)l (IS) Jor the proposed proje at in order to identif)I the nature and extent of
tt a issues to be anal)Ized in the Waft EIR to only those issues where it cannot be sl awn that potentially
signifiaant impacts are antiaipated cannot k e aNioided or mitiglated. Specifically, the purpose of the initial
study is Mofold: (1) to iflanti-ly those issues that will be the silt ject oll the analysis contained in the Draft
EIR; and (2) to eliminate from lurther anal)lsis tt ase environmental issues, it an)I, where it can be st awn
tl at potential impacts resulting from project implementation will be less tl an signilioant. Tl a initial strldy
will contain environmental analysis to sl lg g a rl the conclusion that where an environmental impact [as
been identified as lass than significant, no further analysis is re gluired and tt a issues wlouli I not be
inaluded in the Bra -It EIR. phis anal)lsis, tterefare, must t e neoessariiy comprehensive and exhaustive
and, where necessa r)l, it will iclanti-ly sgeaifia mitigation measures and/or standard conditions Ill at must be
irloargarated into the project to ensure tt at any potentialhl significant impacts that may aocur are reclLiaed
to a lauel of signilicanae in order to eliminate additional analysis in tte Uraf EIR. The environmental
anal)lsis inaluded in the initial shid)l will to Lased on the existing data base and related technical studies
that are germane to develogrnent ofl the subjeat grogert)I. Vltere neaessarrl, information and technical
analilsis pregared t)I the EIR consultant team as well as the agglicant and/or applioant's teahnical
consultants will also be used to evaluate the potential impacts associated witt project implementation.
Once He in itial s tudy is completed, a Notioe of Preparation (NCIP) will t e prepared by tt a aonsulta n t. Tt a
NCIP, together with the initial sttul)l, will t a distributed via certified mail (return receipt) to all recipients
included an a master distribution list estal lished in consultation witt Clit)l s tafl as determined apll ropria to
ty the City of San .Dian Capistrano. the reaipients will include all responsitle and trustee agencies as
well as in to re s ted org aniza tions and individuals as determined t y the Clity.
Estimated -lime Frame: V1 eat s (including Clity re�iievi)
Estimated Budget: 93,200.00
Ta s k 7t re e - Sub Clonsulta n t StUdies
In arder to adequately evaluate project -related impacts, it viill be neaessarrlto undertake several techniaal
s tudies, in aludin g : (1) nois a; (2) air quality; (3) cultLiral res a urges; (4) paleon to logica I re s ources; (5) traffic
and airculatian; and (6) Biologliaal Flssesament. It scopes and tudget for each of the tect nical sttidies
reflected in this proposal for environmental consulting services are attaated. 71-ese studies, whish will be
aandUcted by tt a project team niamt ers, are identi-lied I e low:
(1)
Noise
Tt e A lanningl Oenter
(7)
Air (lualit)l
Tt a A is nningl Center
(3)
7rafflic and Clirculation
I insoatt, Lavi & Gro anspan, Engineers, Inc.
(4)
ll iologiae I Flsses srn ent
IC] F/.Ion e s & Ste I es
(5)
Cultural ResaLiraes
IC]FlJorles & Stol es
(6)
Haleontologliaal Resources
Archaeological Resources h an agement Cla rpla ration
Pinpoi aal fa i EavWmnma ntal Can, ulting 9 enoMea (Ra tiii: n c U
Distnta La Nowa Ali, ied tlse Pmfiiat—San Juan (IaMistrano, C)I
Apil a8, 2 00 9
3
AFICIPCIIHAL FICIN ENVIRCINMENTAL CIONSIULTINC SEVIVICIESI (f1EIV1flE0)
Dl�ITRITO I A N CIVI) tU IX90 L IE AHOJEUT— SAN JUAN CIF PISITFIAN CI, CIA
Estimated Time Frame: 40 A eeks
Estimated Budget: 9173,185.00
9 15,030.00 (Noise)
9 15,155.00 (Alir Quz lity)
9 112,895.001 (Traffic a n d Ciro tilation )'
9 14,104.010 (Bioloc ical Resou ro e s )
9 13,621.00 (ClUltural Resources)
9 2,380.00 (Paleontological Res aLira es)
'[lae s not include optioriz I task of z ttendance at Up to three (3) meetinc s-3 hours [ at $375.00/meeting
Additional Tecl nical &udies
In addition to tt a teal'nical studies identified al aue, other studies and re parts tt at must be prepared znd
slit rn itted to KKCI far inclusion in tt a Draft EIR for 0 a Distrito t a Navia/San duan N eadaws Rrojeat
in a Jude:
• So ils an d Cleolog� I
• HyclralogyAAlater Quality N anz c ement Plan
• PI ase I and/or Prase II Environmental Site PIs s essrn ent
Landfill (lIosure Plan and Post-Cllosure Maintenance Pl< n
• Visual Simulations
It must be noted that 0 a fe as for tt a preparation of tI a teahniaz I studies identified above i re riot included
in a ither tI a scope of work or but Igle t proposed for tt a pre para tion of the Draft HIR far the Distrito U
Noiiia/Si n ,Dian N eadows Project. Tr a studies identified at ave will be submitted to KKCI by the project
appliaz nt.
IB -18 fie viii vii
BeaiUse project irnplementation Hiould require the approval of a Cleneral Plan Almendment, the Clit�l of
San ,Dian Clapistrano must tarn ply with 0 a requirements of SA 18 by slit mittingl a request to the Ni tive
Ameriaz n H e riti c e Cla rnrnissio n (NAIH (l). It is understood that tt a Clity t a s co rn p lied wit/ SB 13 by
sending letters to the a g g ro g riz to Native f Irnerican req re sentatiries. TC a letters info rniet I each of the
Nathie American representz tives of the proposed project in accardanae with tl a provisions of SB 18. to
dz te, res ganses from either the Native Arne rican representatives or the NAIHCI has been receiNied by the
Clity of San duan (lapis tra n o . The informatia n tl z t rn i }l t e g ra Aded by tl a NAI- Cl and I h a tive f Iry a rican
req res e n tz tives prior to tt a corn p letion of the Draft 91R will t e refle ated in tt a discussion of irn pacts to
aUltural resource s in that (loaument
Tas I Ha Lir - Preparation of tt a Sore e n ahecl EIR
The most sic n ific< n t tr s N to t e undertaken as part of tt a g rog a s ed wa rl g roc rani is tt at of p ren a ring the
EIR. AI Sure a naheck EIR will t a tt a greaursor to the Draft doaUment and will be stat m itted to the Clity for
review and coni ni o n t prior to the preparation of the Draft EIR. This v is rl effort will en as rnn ass t oth
primary and seoandar)l research to establish the i rnt ient environmental conditions, understand in detail
the enviranrnental impacts associated witt tte pragased project, eiizluate proposed mitigation measures
Prapasal faaEnvironnnestalaonsrdtin1lSer%ices (Re visa d)
Diatrita da NaiVz NfireclWe Prajact—Szri Jvan Callia6ano, a
April 78, 2402
4
PRCIFHXI d FIC IR EWLIFICINMEIA Ti I CIOA SLLTINGI <IEIRVlCIEISI ("EL/EIEGI)
DISITRI TCI Lt A M 1� N 1XEIa USEI PRO, IEICIT — SAA JUAA CIA FIISITR� I1 O, Cly
and/or recommend additional mitigation measures to eliminate or reduce environmental impacts to an
accell to t le lei ie I.
Altf ough the scope of the Oraft EIA will t e form a11)1 (I( term ined vit en the initial stud,I (reler to Task Two )
is compl( t( (I am (I the sac ping meeting canClucted, this propasal assumes that the Draft RIR will address
several is s ues based on a prelim inary revi( w of the propos ad p raject as well as (lir( ction prop sided by the
Clit�I of San ,luau Clapistram a. The Uraf EIR COON( proll ased for tf a project is pr( rented below, followed
t y a brief (liscuss ion oil the info rma tion that will t e included in (a ch section of the (laaument.
Wall EIR
Table oil Clonlenis
Clisiniio La Naiiia/San ,lua n N oadomis Pnojecl
San Juan Capislnano, Cpl
CIHAIPTER 'I.( - E)l ECIUTI% E SUMMAR)I
1.1 Description of the Proposed Projeat
1 .1.1 R roj( at Locatia n
1.1.3 Rroj( at Desaription
1.1.3 Proj( at Pf asing
1.1A Proji at Objeatives
1.2 Fllternatimes
1.2.1 Summary of Alt( rnatives
1.2.:1 Ern lira n m t n tall)I Superior Altern atil i(
1.3 F Ir( as oil C Ion tra riersy
1.4 ISI LK s to be Resold( (I
1.9 Impact Summary Table
CIHAIPTER 2.0 - INTRCI13UC7TION
J.1 PUrll a se of the Uraft EIR
2.1.1
Aluthority
2.1.2
Incorporatia n t y HE ler( n ce
2.1.3
Intended Uses of tt a Draft EIR
2.1.4
R( lated Alp p ra vals
2.1.5
AIgl( ncies F.a,iing Jurisdictian
2.1.6
Amailat ilitil a l the Oralt EIR
2.2 N e tf odolog� I
J.2.1 ElAstingl Em�iironmental Settings
Pi r pa sa IR, i Ei vi bi manta t 4 a i s i dtir g 9 emia es (Ra a iso c Ij
DistrR4 La M 0a ti hied I Use Prc ja at —San A ia� a aMik iai o, GA
Api 7 J 6, � Oa 9
5
AF CIPCISAL AOF EIINLIIRCINMEINTAL CIQNSULTINCI SIEIRVICIES (RBB/Illa[,l
DIISTR1TO I A IV QVI) M1XaL iJ SIE AF OJ13C IT — STAN JUAN CIL PISTRAN Q, CIA
2.2.2 Significance Qriteria
2.2.3 Project Design He atLireslStandard Clc nditions
2.2.4 EnvironmentallmpactAnalysis
2.2.5 Mitigation N easures
2.2.6 Level of Signiliaance PI'Iter Mitigation
CIHAIPTER 1.0 - PRCIIJECT DESURIPTICIN
3.1 Proje a t L ocatia n
3.1 Defin ition o1 the Project Site
3.3 Environmental Setting)
3.4 Histon I a n d Ehloluti( n a I the Pra p osed Project
3.5 Project Description
3.6 Project Phasing
3.7 Project Cltjectiries
CF APTER 4.0 - EN% IRCIN MENT.4IL ANALYSIS
4.1 Land UselFifelevant Planning
4.2 Ira llic and Clirculation
4.3 Ar Quality
4.4 fl ois e
ZIA Pllt lic Health and Saflet)l
d.E Drainage and H!Idre logy
'I.1 0 ialogiaal Resc Lira es
4.8 allltLiral/Saientilia Rlemiraes
4.1 Soils and C ec logy
4.14 Population and F ousin gl
4.11 Public Serrlices and Facilities
d.11.1 R( lice Protectia n
d.11.3 Flire Proteation
Papasall4rEavirofimentalalaa.niting9eruiae: (Reau.ad)
Distrita La Novia Ali;iec l Use Pr( jaat — San ..lna■ Qagi. tiano, (IA
AP41 A8, 2Oa9
6
FHCIPCISAL ACIA ENV IRCINMENTAL CIONSILTLTINCI SEFIVICIESI fla ,4103)
DISTRITO l A N CIVIC IU IXEO bIcIE AROJE CIT— S1AN JUAN CV PISITFV N Cl, CU
4.11.3 School Hac ilities
4.11.4 Parks and Recreation
,eI.1 a Utilities
4.12.1 Sew( r Fa( ilities and Servi(
4.12.2 VI ate r Fla( ilities and Service
4.12.3 Solid Waste Fa( ilities
4.13 Aestr etici
CIHAIR ITER 1.0 - CION UL AI11% E IN PAKITS
5.1 Iles( rigtion of Clurnulati�ia Rrojacts
5.2 Clumulatime Impacts Analysis
CIFAPTER 6.0 - Al TERNATIVES TC17HE PROPOSED PRCIJECT
6.1 letrodt ration
6.1.1 Purpoia and Saope
6.1.3 Clriteria of Allt( ra a tives
6.1.3 Iclantilication of Fllternatnles
6.2 Flnalysis of Allternatives'
9.3 Summary of Allternatives
9.4 Identification a f EnN lira n mentall}l Superior A11ternatnle
CIF AIPTER 7.0 - SICINIFICIAINT IRRE% ERSIBLE EN% IRCINN ED TAIL CF AA GES W HIOF WOULD
EE INV OL%ED IN 1HE PROPOSED AKITICIN SHCIULL7 IT BE IN PLEMENIIED
Cli AIPIER 8.0 - CIRCIWTH-1N17UCIING IN PAKITS
CIHAIPTER 9.0 - INN EN11aRY OF N ITICIATION MEASURES
CIHAIPTER 10.0 - INV ENTCIRY OF UNPIN C1111POI. E SIGNIFICAINT AIDVERSE IN PAKITS
CIHAIPTER'1'1.0 - CIRGANIZAIMONS RIND PERSCINS CONSUL TEE]
CIHAIPTER '19.0 - E IBLIOCIRAPHN
'A rnaiirnum of four ; Iterrati+ies, iri luding tt a "Mo f1roje ct" alterr; ti+ie will be evaluated. the spec ific rature of tl a la nd i ise(s) c f
aaaI of tl'a elterriz tives will be determined in , on:cltatic r witl the Cityl c f San ,vzn Cali: trano and naiecterl teahnir al con: ultanty.
Prapasal fa,rEnvironmental flaiarrlting 9emioes (Rovisacp
Distrfta La Nocua Nhied We Projeat— San Aoii Capijtrario, a
April J8, 2 0a 9
7
FiRC FIC SAI AC R E1NU IFIC NMaN 71A1 CION SL L 71VNCl SEIRVICIES (f]EN ISELI,I
DIS171R171CIIANOW &1XE1UUSEIPROJEIC171—SAN JUAN GAPIS71FV NO, Ch
TECIHNIC A L APPENDUI
A. Notice of PrE parationllnitial Study
B. NCIP Comment Letters
CI. Traffic Flnalys is
D. Alir Clualit�l AIna lysis
E. Noise Elnalysis
F. HNlclralogypinaINIsis
CI. 8 is logisa I Resauraes Assessment
l-. Clultteral Resateraes Elssessrnent
1. Paleantologioal FIE sources Plssf ssment
A suns rn ary of the info rrn a tion and analyses to t e inaluded in eact of the sections identified in tt e
preceding table of aantents is presented be low.
1.0 Exe(l tetive Summary
FI summary of the project location, tee scriptian and objeativea will t e presented in tl is seation as v+iell as a
summary of tte potential impacts, mitigation measures, and unavoidat IE enNiironmental consequences,
presented in a matri)i or table format. This section will also iric lude a brief description ofl earl t alternative
(including Wentifisation of the "environmentally superiorl' alternative), a list of potential areas ofl
controver311, and issues to be resolved as rEquired b?1the State OECIAClteidelines.
2.0 Introduction
Pis introdua to rel section will identify the purpose and scrape oil the Draft HIR, the contents of the
clocument, the authority by whicl it has been require (I, tt a aglc ncies haling jurisdiction over the project,
and the intends cI uses of tt a clocument (i.E ., subsegteent disarE tionary a ncllar n rrrl it approvals ).
3 A Project Description
A complE to (1E scriptian of ill a project, including its I istory and e) iolution, lacation, parameters, pt acing (if
a vailat IE ), an (I all a a tions nece s sary to implE m ent the p ra posed projea t will I a pres e n ted in this seation.
The cle scriptia n will in clud( a narrativE corn n a vent and statistical tables as appropriate to adequatel)l
describe the nature, scope and int(nsity of tt a project. Tt is section will also include a brief presentation
ofl t a a k ground inflormatian neces sar�l to provide a conte)it for the app licatia ns.
4.0 En) iira nm ental AInal�isis
The purpose of tt is chapter a tt a [Ira ft EIA is to (Ir scribe the existing envirenrnantal conditions on tee
s tit ject property and in t1 e e nvirons and to identify tt E potential impacts a r cl o n sequence e s that may result
from imple rn e ntation of the n rope sed project. TI is secs tion will a a ntain e e environmental analysis for eace l
issue that t as been determined to be tt e subject of tr a Elraf EIR. Tt a extent of the analysis a ncl
documentation far eacl issue will to identified in the initial studrl undorlaien in Tasty Two as well as in
NCIP cearnrnents and duringl tl a metric saopingl meeting. In same cases, tte disclussion will be a summary
011 a tecl n ical study prepared t y a mem t e r o11 tt e a g n lican is aonsulta n t tea rre . In ea o f cas e where a
technical study will be the basis fo r tl a enAronmental analysis contain a c1 in tt a Elft, tt E to c hnica I req a rt
Propos al far EmiircamantalCans ulting 11ervnes (Retezetl)
Distr'to La Noiu:i Mixed [ Isa Pn jeat— Sven Juan Capistrana, CSI
flpif 2a, :10(19
FRCIF CI.h I FICIR EINWICINMBN T) I CIONSUTINCI ,1IBAVICIEISI (REVIISEL])
DISITRITCI Lf N Oli I� N IXBO USIEI PRO,IBCIT— SAN JUAN CIA F ISITH4 AO, Cl,c
will be sonde nsed to prese nt tl E exi: ting emlironmental aonditia ns, provide an as; a Esment of tt a potential
project -related impacts, and identilylreaommend appropriate mitigation measure: to ensure that ti (i
environmental ca n s equences are eliminated or reduces I to a le! s tt a n : iglnifia a n t level, H lea! ible. Als
indicated in the recommended Table of Clontents, the emiironmental analysis vlitl evaluate Aatential
associated witt a wide range of issues. in addition, if determines) necessary, additional is: Lies wollld also
t e evaluated Lased on relevant comments recehied during tt a NCIPlsaoping prone ss.
Tl a scope oil wart included in this proposal also includes the preparation of s&ieral technical sbidies (i.e.,
t )Idrology/t,ldraulk s, noise, air qualit)l, culturallscientifia resource; , visual simulations, and t iolog iaal
res a Lira es). However, it st a uld t e notes I that the land use studies and other teat n ical docurn e n tation
grepa reel b)lllor tl a applicant and/or City of San Juan Clapistrano will also t ( utilised to the extent tt ey are
applicable to tt a proposed project. In order to lacilitate the anal)lsis of each is; Lie, a standard format will
be en g la yed to anahlae each issue thoroughl)l. Tt is -lormat is presented belo+ni witt a brie fl discussion ion oil
Ill a inlormation inaluded Within eaah topia.
E)iistin( Environmental Setting
This introductory section desarites tte e)iisting environmental conditions related to east issue
analyzed in the Dra-It EIA. In accordance viith tte State CEQAI Cuidelines, Loth tte local and
regional settinc s are disauSsed a! they oAst prior to irnplementation oil the proposed project. Thi:
cloaLirnentation will serve as tt a baseline upon whiat the project -related impacts will be eiialuated.
Sig a divan a e Crite ria
Specific ariteria will be identilied and pre ,ented in this seation of tt a Draft EIR upon whist tt a
sic niilicanae of tt a praject-related patential impacts is determined. The siglnifi( ance criteria +nlhicl
are tte basis of the enviranm(ntal analysis contained in tta Draft EIF1 viill be derived from tle
sig ni-licant efle( is presented in the State CIECI/I C Llidelines, adopted laaal (i.e., Cit)l of San Juan
Clap istrano, etc.), State and/or fes le ra l polio ies and grog ram s tt at may apply; and ott a r (a rn rn o n ly
accepted to a hnicaI and non -technic al standa rds pre scribed by res p a risible agencies (i.e., Clounty
of Orange, Soutt Cloast PION D, Claltrans, eta.) cle term ined tot a appropriate by tt a lead ag an cy.
Project Desig n tle a tura s /Stn ndard Cla n dition s
Tt is section of tt a document will identify specific project desk n -leatures (PCIF) tt at will be
incorporates I into tl a proposed project that are in to n ded to preempt project -related impacts (e.g.,
incorporation of mature landscaping, eta.) b`I tt a applicant as well as standard aanditions (SC)
that are t71Pically imposed ty regulatory agencies (e.g., adterenae to tte Lnilarm Building Clode)
on development in order to (insure safet)l and minimize achierse environmental eflect:. The
discto s ion of potential environmental imp acts in Clhapte r 4 will reillect the incorporation oil any
PI]F: and SCs in chided tt is section.
Environmental lrnpact Flnahlsis
The environmental analysis ilor each issue , whist I as been de to rra fined tot a tt e s Lit jest o-1 tt e
❑ralt EIR, is contained in this section of tt a document. The extent of the anal)lsis and
(lac umentation ilor each isss le viill be identified in tt a initial ! tudy (r(f( r to Task Two). In same
oases, tt a discussion will be a summar�l of a technical study prepared ty a member of tl e
Prnposat farEi Wrai mental Cansultirg 9enkes (Ravisaco
Distrita Lil Nouia Alined Use Pray ct— San duan Oalli,itrano, CA
ApO ; 8, ; Oa 9
0
AACIFICIIIIAL ACIR EINV IRCINMEIN TAL CION SIL LTINCI SEIAVICIE,9 (F1M 11IEL1,1
DISTRITO LA NOIII,s N IXEU U.5IEI PAOJEICIT— SAN JUAN C,4 PISITA� NO, CIS
consultant team. In stiah case, ft e teclnical report viill be condensed to present tte existing
envira n rn e n tal as n dition s, provide an assessment of the pate n tial project -relates I impacts, and
I
identify/recommend appropriate mitigation measures to ensure tf at tt a em0ronmental
conn gltiences are eliminated or reduces) to a less than significant lemei, if feasit le. 4111 project -
related irn Il a ots, including those associated with all pt as es of the propos ( d gra jest, viill be clearly
and adequatel)l analysed in acaa rdance viith the State CEWI Guislalines. It 21`00d be noted that
any previous land use studies and/or otf ( r technical documentation prepared byllor the applicant
and/or Clity of San Juan Clapis tra n o will be utilizes I to the extent it is applicable to the p ra p o sed
project. In artier to facilitate the impact anal)lsis, 0 a folloviing outline will t e titiliaed in pre paring
the project -relates) environmental anal)Isis.
Pote n tial Eflects of tt a Projeat Found to t e In sign ificant
St o rt-TermlClo n structia n Impacts
Long -Term 1Clperationa I Impacts
Potential Effects of tl a Projeat Hound to be Significant
Sf art-Term/Construction Impacts
L ong-Te rrn IC perational Im pacts
Ivitigatian IVeasures
Vt t ere a potential s ignifiaant emiironmental effect has t fen identified base cl an the criteria
identified in analysis and that impact cannot be avoided, mitigation measure swill be isle n ti'lied and
inaluded in this seation oll the document mihicf °... minimiae significant advetua impacts ... ihn
eacl significant environmental eflgct identiMed in the EdR', as presarited in the State CI9CIA
Guide lines.
LeNial of Signifiaance after tv itiga lion
Unamoidabla signifiaant adverse impacts are those efleats that either cannot I a mitigated or they
remain significant even alter mitigation is inaargarated into the pragosed project. These
significant effects, it determined to a result of project irnglementatiori anter mitigation, will be
identified in this section of the Draft EIR. Prior to apllroNial of the proposed project, the San Juan
Capistrano Clity Clauncil viill be required to aclopt a Statement of Ove rriding Clonside rations that
identities and desorites the Iltit lic benefit(s) associated vuith Ilroj( at implementation that offset the
significant irngaats.
Additionall)l, tte State CIEWI Cluidelines regluires a discussion of "any inaansistenaies between
tl a pnapasedproject ansa applical le genewllllans and Aegionalplana." This discussion will occur
Witt in Section 4.1 (Land UselRel&iant Planning ).
5.0 Clumulatime Impacts
This section of the Draft EIA viill locus on other projects that are proposed or approved in tt a project
environs that would create demands on servicing agencies and affect tf a ability of those agenaies to
continue to Ilro+aide an adequate level of service. Tte Clity of San Juan Calistrano milli identif)l an!I
Piaposi Ila EnWronmameI Can5utting 9eniiaea (Rntu5nc)
Dist0d La Nouie A is ied Use Pniia at— San glue n a aifi.itraeo, CA
Ap1718, 3009
10
PIROVOSAI FICIR EWUIFICINMEINT14t CIOIVSUL71NNC1 SEAVICIES (IfiEI ISEL1,I
DIS71RI71C l I A N OWi N IXE13 USEI PROJaCI7l— SAN JUAN CIA PISMAN 0, CIA
prcjects tlat have been prapcsed or are appra%ied in tte viainit)l o-1 the Aromased project witlin its
jurisdiction. In addition, the Clity will quer)l adjacent municipalities in an effort to identify additional projects
in the vicinity of the stil ject property. These other projeats will be evaluated Witt tt a praposed project to
determine project -related aLimLilathie impacts. Tl is sectio no I the Draft EIR will also provide a discussion
of tt ase oumulathie projects and their potential irnAaats on the several issues analysed in Chalter 4.0 of
V a document.
0.0 Alternatives to the Proposed Prcject
Clhapter 6.0 will promide a qualitative irapaot analysis of the alternatives identi-lied by KKC and the Clity of
San Juan Clagistrano. Tt rea potential land use alternatNes will be identified ty the (lity during the initial
stages ofl the analysis. Tt a Draft EIR will anal)lze a maximum ofl bur alternatives, including tt a "no
project" alternathie as prescribed ty tle State CIECIA Guidelines, w[ ich will be selected 'lollowing the
completion of the en�iironmental impact analysis ty KKC and appro+ied by the Environmental
Aldministrato r.
7.0 Siglnilicant Irretrievat le Erimironmental Changlas VI I ich uA GUld Be Involmed in the Proposed Alctian
Should It Be Implemented
Those impacts, which cannot be avoided, e�len Witt the implementation oil mitigation measures, will t e
identified and surnmarized from the discussions aontained in (It apter 4.0.
8.0 C rornith-Inducing Impacts
Tte manner in whict tte project aculd foster eaonomia and/or population grouitt, Bitter directly or
indirectly, in the surrounding area will be thoroughl)l clisCLissed. Tt a aharacteristics of the project, whicl
may encourage and facilitate other actimities tt at could iigniliaantly affeat tt o environment, eitl er
indhiiduall)l or cumulati%ielrl, will also be disaussed in this chapter.
c .0 Inventarrl of Mitigation Mea3ures
TI is chapter of tl a document will include a comprehensive listing of the mitigation measures that will be
re( hired as a result of project implementation. Tl is listing a mitigation measures will be used to create
tt a mitigation monitoring and reporting program tl at Will stiflUlate the timing and responsit ilitrl for each
mitigation measure.
10.0 Inventory of Un&iaidable Siglailicant AkNierse Impacts
AI comprehensive listing of the potential una+iaidable a(hierse impacts (i.e., those tt at cannot be mitigated
to a less than sigh i licant to %lel) that are anticipated as a result (if p reject implementation will t a p res en ted
in this section of the graft EIR. to addition, cumulative imlaats that are significant and unavoidat le will
also be identified and listed.
11.0 Organizations and Persons Clonstilted
AI comprehensive listing of each individual and the organiaation with uit ich the individual is associated will
be included in tt is Chapter of the Orailt EIR to document the source of the inlormatia n utilized in tt a
environmental anal)lsis.
Pikipoi:+iIfaiEnuurartmentalCan:ulGrig3eneae; (Ra tiu:acl)
Disln'ta La Nowa Al isisd LIse Pn juat— San Juan Japislrana, CA
April : 8, t 049
11
AF CIFICIIIAL RCIF EINL IRCINMEIN TAL CIOttl SL LTINCI SE1IF VICIES IAF EI lE E01
DIS 7iIRI71Cl LA N OVII N IXElaUI" EI PF OJEIIC171— SAAl JUAN CV PIS7IF / NO, CU
12.0 Biblia glra p 1 y
Eaat doaiument used as a reference or source of information will also be identified and presented in the
Bit Iiography tl at viilI serve as a referenaa to tl ase rmiieviing the Draft EIR. Rtirsuant to current CIECIA
require rnents, the location (s) where eaal of tt e t ibliaglranhic references is maintained will be identified in
tl is ct a p to r to facilitate the review sI ould the referenaa m a terials t e needed.
Upon completion of tie Screenct a a k EIR, the EIR consultant will print three (3 ) copies o-1 tl a document
and sut rnit 9 ern to the Clity's Planning Departrnant for reviemi and aamment. In addition, one (1) CID -
ROM aopy in MS Vlarcl format will also to sutmitted to the Clity with the three printed screenaleck
daauments.
Estimated Time Frame: 13 Weeks
Estimato(10LWgleit: $78,9(0.00
Task Fide - Rreparatia n of the Uraflt EIR
;III ca ra rne ntE on the information and anal)lsh contains d in the Screenat a ck EIR ni a(la t y Clity staff during
their review will t e florvrarded to tt a Fla ansultant for incarparation into the Draft HIR. It i! anticiIate(I
that the Clit)l's reviemi will t a as ra p leted witt in a two -we eb period. TI e Clity will re viemi tt a (loaument to
ensure that the in'lormation contained witt in it is adequate and complete t afore t1 a Draf EIR is printed
and distrit uted. ;I total oil twenty (20) copies al the Draft EIR and two (7) ac pies o1 tt a to chnia al appendbi
will be printed once it is approved brlthe San Juan Clapi: trana Planning Department staff. In addition, one
CO-RCIN aopy of botl tl a Dralk EIR and Teat nical a ppendiaes in '.pol format will also be ! ut mitted to t1 a
City of San Juan Clapi! trana. Clnce relea: ad t y City staff, tl a amAronmental aonsultant will distribute tl e
Draft HIR with t1 a Notice of Clompletian (NCIC) for a 411 -clay put Iia review and as m m ent peria cl. Tt e
document will t e rn aile(I Niia certified mail (return reaa ipt) to the entities identified on the master (liE tribution
At t1 at also reaeived tl a NOP.
H: timated Time Frame: 4 V1 a a I' s
H: timated Budget: $3,500.00
Ta! H Six - Re! ponse to Public Ca rn rn ants
At the end of the State-man(lated X19-dayl put lie review period, all comrnentE reaeived by the Clit(l tom
local, State and other respon� ible agenaies an(I interested partiaE will be forwarded to the EIR con! 1.11tant.
Eaal as rn m ent will be addresse(I a! it relate: to tl a adequac�l a l tt a Draft EIR. ;In appendiai to tt a Draft
EIA will be prepared t1 at inaludes a Ih ting of eaah agency/individual commenting an the 11raft EIR, the
aorre s p ondence received from the commentator, and the responses 11 repare(I far eaah relevant aomment.
AI total of liflte e n (1;1) as p ies of the responses to public comments appendbi (i.e., Draft Final EIR) and one
(1) all -ROM in *.pelf format will be submitted to the City of San Juan Clapistrano Planning) Clepartrnent.
(Nate: The estini a to d t udget for thi, task is based an 110 hours at a t illat le rate oll $90.0( 11 a ur.)
Estirn ate (I Time Frame: 7 Weeks
Estimate (I Budglet: $4,9((.00
Prapasa! faaErivironnienta! Caisi Itirng SerWois (Revised)
iFitnta 1 a Nadia Mined We Project— Jan A an Caj istmno, CA
Apiff 18, 2110!
12
PACIFICI�<U 4 ACIDEIMIFICINMEIND L CION SLLTINGI SEIRVICIEISI (REVISIEGIJ
DISITRITO LA A OV 1� N IXELI USE I PRO, IEICIT — SAN JUAN CA FIISITR� A O, CIS
Task Seven - Final Elft
(Ince tl a Ciraft EIF is certified, the Final EIF will be prepared. TI at document will oonsi9t of tl a response
to comments appendix and all ne oessary to stimon)l and minutes of tl a public C earings. If necessary, tt e
Minal RIH will include "redline/strikeout" revisions that reflect cl anges resulting from comments reae ived
during the public revievi and comment period. A total of three (3) printed oapies of tt a Clertifie cl flinal EIR,
one (1) CID -F CIN copy in N S "ord format, and one (1) copy in *.pdf fa rmat will submitte d to the A lanning
Department.
Estimated Time Frame: 9 Weei s
Estimated Bridget: "i'900.00
Tas I Eigt t - Mitigation N onitorin Program/Fin( lin _ s/Statement of DiGrridinq Con s ideration s/Oity Clouncil
F esolrition
The EIR consultant will prepare the N itigation N anitoring and Feporting Program (MMF P) for the
proposed proje at. This docr inn en t will be presented to the Clity of Sari Juan n Clap istrano and will identify
eact mitigation meaWre to be carried aUt if the project is implemented, the entity tl at will t e re sponsit le
for implemE nting the mitigation nieasure(s), and vil en eact nie asure will be implemented. In addition, tl e
Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Clonsideration, if determined necessary (i.e., rinavoidat le
significant adverse im q a a is re main after mitigation), will also be prepared and s Lit m itted to tt a Clity for
review and presentation to the City of San Juan Clan istrano Planning C la rn m issia n and Clity Coi ria it for
certiflia ation prior to a p proval of the propose d q roject. In a ddition , KKC will als a q re p a re tt a Clity Clouncil
EIR Clerlificatian resolutian.
Estimated Tim a Frame: 4 VI a 0 s
Estimated Budget: $4,000.( a
Ta s k Nine - R Lit lic Hearings
As stipulated in tl a RFP, tt a EIR consultant will attend up to four (4) advisory commission meetings,
including those of the San ,luan Qapi trano Traffic Clo rn m issia n and Planning Clo m m issia n . The
estimated budget proposed for ti is task will also accommodate two (2) public hearings before the San
Juan Clapistrana Clity Clauncil. Tle Project Manager will attend eaal and be responsible for rnaiing all
n re s entatioii s and res Ilan cling to questions raised I di irin gl Ito A LIt lic rn e e tings and/or hearings as directed
t }l Clity staffl. SI ould additional meetings and/ar i e arings be required, they will be al argle d at the
anprap riate hourly rate, tIgon authorisation bbl the Clity of San ,Ills n Call istrano.
Estimated Time Frame: Ala Required
Estimated Budglet: 111,990.00
PinposaI fu Er viror n a tal Qa snllin1l Seruiaas (Revised)
t i.i t. ila 14 Na wa k b iei I Ua a Praia ct — Sa i Ji o Cap fa is or o, U
Apri178, OM
13
PMIFIMI� l ACID EWVIFICINME3N Tf l CION SLLTINCI SERVICIEISI (REVMIELI)
CIISITRITCI LA N Ob U N IXE❑ USIEI PRO, IBCIT — SAN JUAN CIA FIISI71IR/ N O, CIS
III. RROJECT SCF 90L LE
Tte scane of serviaes 11retlglt T<<k Fotlr (i.e., stltrnittal of the Screencteck EIH) praEented in thi,
proposal cs n be aaaomplisI ed in approxirn ately 12 vie a H s from is, uE nce of the Notiae to Proceed. Thi,
scl a chile is n res a n ted belovrr.
Project Schedule
Ois lnito La Noilial& n .Tuan N eaclov s Mail EIR
San Juan Capistrano, CIA
Estimalled
Estimated
Task Description
Time
Completion'
1 Project Management
Ali Required
2 Initial Stud /Notice of Preparation
3 Weeks
June 1, 2008
NOP Comment Period
4 Weeks
July 1, 2008
3 Technical Studies
40 VI e e N s
May 1, 2009
4 Preparation of Screencheck EIR
12 VI e a N s
August 1, 2009
5 Preparation of Draft EIR
'I Weeks
September 1, 2009
Notice of Completion/Draft EIR Public
6 VV a e F s
Octot e r 1,11, a 009
Clomment Period
6 Response to Comments
2 Weeks
Nova m t e r 1, 2009
7 Preparation of Final EIR
2 Weeks
November 15, 2009
Preparation of Finclings/k itigatian
8 K a n itoring Pro gr rn ISta to rn ent
4 W eek s 5
Nova ra t e r 111, 2009
of Overriding Clonside rations
9 1 Public Hearings
As Required
I t.b.d.
'Alssume., n reject start-up of h i )I 1, 2008.
2AIssumes ala weel ! .
3Alssumes 12 week!.
4lnclucle s City review.
5Can be prepared during 45 -day public re\lieNr period.
IV. 13STIMATHD BUDGET
The scope of , ervim and v ra 0 project described in Section 11 of tt is n ra n a sal will be tin Berta 1, en a n d
carnnfeted for an estirnatod fee of $232,193.(0. Tl is fee inchItle, project management, preparation of tl e
teal nical studies identified in TasH Tl rae, tte enviranrnental iranaat anahlsis (irlaludingl tl a Draft and Final
EIRs), printing and distribution of tte Draft EIR, attenclanae at publia tearings, and pa�lrnent of filing fee-
(i.e., NOU filing and COIICI fees).
PrcpcsalfcrEnvironnue+ital(lorisiiiting9erviaes (RaWsacp
I] i.itritc I a M tiva M 61ec I W6 Prnje ct — Sari Jean Capi.i trano, UA
April 78, 2d(11
14
PF OFICV � AC IF E NU IF CINMEAT� A CIOA SLLTING I FIEF VICIESI (r EVI�cIELIJ
LiTRI TCI L� A0L/� MIXELI USIEIPF0,IEC IT– HIAA J U A A CAFIISTF� h0, CIS
Estimated Budget
Distrito l a Novia/San Juan Meadows Pei Elea -it EIR
Sa n Jua n Capistrano, CAI
Estimated
Task
Description
Budget
1
Project Management
$ 5,520.00
]
Initial Stud /Notice of Preparation
$ 3,200.00
Sut -(long ultant Studies
($1Y,185.0
Na ise
15,0 QA (
Alir Quality
15,159.4('
Clultural Resources
13,621A(
Paleontc logics I Re9a LIrc es
2,": 80.00
7 rafli rid Circulation
112,895.00'
Biological Resources s
14,14 ,I .(( 3
4
Preparation of Screencheck EIR
$ 28,500.00
5
Preparation of Draft EIR
$ 3,500.00
6
Response to Public Comments
$ 4,500.00
7
Preparation of Fie; I IIIR
$ 1,500.00
Proi r tion of Findings/Mitigation N onitoring
8
Pra c r; rn/State rn a nt of O� le rriding Cla nsir leration s/Clity Clouncil
$ 4,000.00
EIR Clertification Res olutian
9
Public Hearings
$ 3,990.00
Sub -Total - Professional Fees
$ 723,895.00
Printing and Reproduction/Supplies/Postage
$ 5,D00.00
Tota I Estimated Bud et
$232,895.0d;'—
232,895.00'Budget
Budgetdoes nat inclLide attendance at meeting! and/or public hearing E. If required,
fee! for
a tte n dance at pL it lic hea rin g E wa LIld be net a tiated prior to a LIV orizatia n.
`Budget doe: net inCkide $1,125 for attendance bel project traffia engineer at tI re (3) rnae tings at
f 319.001meetiric . Altteridl n a at meetinc s ulauld ocaur only E t the request of tl a Cit�l.
`Budget refle( tE re connai! sante ! ite vis it for bis logia E I resource! and foci i! e d surve)ls
for the coa ! tal
ClIalifa rn is gnatcatcl a r (3 s ite viE its). If cle to rrn ined necessary, t ased on NOP comment: re eived
from re: a LIroes agencies (e.g., CIDFG, USFi S, etc.), a re, lised : c ape and br ulg e t war ild t e prepared
to addre ss resot irce! agenc+l aomment: .
4Estirn c to a nly. Subje c t to revie%nl and neg a tiatiort It < < ed on rtc hire a n d exten t o f n ut He
c omments
re( eived (IL rinc tt a publia reviemi period.
9lnc ludes prin tin g and reproductic n assoa iated mrith 5 c a q ies a f tt a Sa i enchecl EIR,
50 con ies of
tI a Draft EIR, and 10 copies c the Final EIR.
60oes not in c lude the t Lick et for the preparation a f a Pt s se I ESA, mihic I wor Ild t e subnt itte d for re vievi
E nd approval if cleterrn ined net a ssary a: a result a f the initial : til(lyl.
PmjIc,ial for i niuii nmental Con i ing SoNices {Reviled)
Dia0to 2 a Na via N,bwcl Use Aroje t— San Juan Capishani , CA
All n12a, 2009
11
ARCIPCISAL FOR EAWRCIAMEWTAL CICINSULTINCI SEIRLICIES IPEIIIISE113.1
LIISTRITO I A N CIVIA MIXEICI L SE RFICIJEICIT— SAN ,16AN CIS PISTRAN C1, CIA
V. DELI IN BRAE Lag
Ali stipulate d in the FIE IP, k KCI v sill n roriide the Clit! I with tt a -lolla wing da live ra t les:
• Three (3) f and copies and one (1) CID-RCIN cop!I in MS Word Format o1 tl a Screen ar eck
EIR
• Twenty (20) 1 and cc pies and one (1) CD-RON cc nyl in *.pol f( rnat of tl a Publia Review
Draft EIR.
Tw( (2) hard copies and one (1) CID-FICIM copy I in *.n(lf format o1 the Technia al
Flppendia e s .
• Fifteen (15) hard espies and are (1) CD-RCIN in *.pdf-lormat oil the Draft Flinal EIR.
• Three (1) hard collies and one (1) CCI-RCIN copy in N S VI ( rd farnat and *.pdf format oil
the Clerlified Final Ell IR.
• CI(nies (f CEQAI-required Notiaes pasted with tte Claunty Cllarl (i.e., Notice oil
Pro para tion, Notice of Completion, and Notice of Determination).
• Statement o1 Chierriding Clonsi(le rations (SOCI)
•
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMFIP).
• Findingls of Flact.
• Clit}I Ck unail Resolution Clerliiyingl tre Final EIR.
PrapusaI fa iEmaVranmantaI Consulting 9enunes {Rovisucp
Disftifi La No%iia Ali. iedUss Pnilnat—San duan (IaMi.itraeo, CA
Aptif Jt, 2 04 3
16
F RCIPCISA L ROR EA V IRCIA MANTA L C ICINSIU LTINC 151ARM IESI (REIV M I80 I
Dl"EITRITO L4 N (]VIA MIXAD L IIE AROJAC IT— 5V N,16,4 N CIV P15ITRAN Cl, CIA
VI. RESRONSIBII_11Y OF RROJEC7 APRUICIANT M EIAOR CITN OF SAID JUAP
CAPISIRA1h CI
TI a falloviing informatiari shall t a Arauided to tl' a conssiitant in order to aornplete the arialy:i is desorit ed in
tt is proposal.
1. Flll pre) 0ous ern lira n mental c la auments q ra q a re d fa r tt a subja at property and vicinit�l of the
property.
2. FIII pertinent technical analyses prepared for the applicant ari(Jor Clity and identified in
Task 3, including, but not limited to: (1) sails and geolog)l stud}I; (2) tydrolog)l and
engineering (i.e., pre- and past-(lovelogrnent drainage studies); (3) Water Quality
Manage rne n t Plan (W QMP); (4) Hydraulic clic & Hyc Ira logic Study; (5) k isual Sim ula tions ; (6)
Landfill (Ila s Lire Plan [Tea t n ica I In fa rm ation; and (7) Phase I and (i n a aessary) Phase 11
En vironmeri to I Site /Is ses s rr ents.
3. PI large -s sale topographic map (i.e., 1" = 104') of tt e s Lit jest property (in reproducit le
form).
4. Topography in rep ra ducit le orm
9. ; Ierial photogra q t , iavailable
a. /I cornglete project (Ascription, inaluding a statistical surnrnary of the grogased grojeat
and plans re flectiri g tt a proposes ( la uelopra o ri t plan and I related disaretionaryaction (e.g.,
General Plan Arna n dment, Architectural Cla n tra I, etc.) n ecess a r}I to irn p lement tt e
proposes I q roje at.
3. Draft Cla rn p re t enshia Development Plan, Clonceq tua I De irelopmen t Plan , Clonceptt is I
Grading Plan, Clonco ptLial Clircula tion Plan, etc.
8. Ptasing/Develaprnant Plan ttat provides statistical surnrraryo the anticipated sequenae
of development.
9. Large-scale plans refloating glrasling and site design.
16. Gros! -!actions Him trating"existing"an(I"qa:t-develaprnant" aonditians.
11. Adapted Cit)l of San Juan Clapistrano General Plan (all ek rrerts) and Zoning Ordinance.
12, Impact s ign ifica n ae criteria adopted b� I the C lity of San Jua n Capistrano (il am I).
13. List of aLirn Lilati)re projects (i.e., proposed, a p proved and pending).
1 �I . Notice of Pre qa ra tion di: trit ution list.
Pnipasal far Et Wror menta! Cc i sultir g Iemiaea (R4iWsacU
Distrita La Notiva Ali; ied Use Prajac t — San Juai a api,i tray o, CA
April 18, 3 da 9
17
FIFICIPCISAL AOAEAUIRCINMEINTAL CICINSULTINCI SEIRVICIE511IRENMlaAj
DOTRITO LA NCIVI� M1XEIC1 LSE FRCUEICIT— SAN JUAN CIS PISTRANCI, CA
VII. SIATHMENT OR ORFERITEIRMS OF AGREIEIMEN I
Tt a EIR aonsultant and technical con9iiltants identified in this I rol anal are prepared to begin work on the
Distrito I a Novia/San .Dian h eaclows Projeat Draft EIR immediately ul an e)iecutian of the contrast. You
may be assured tt at should we to seleated to rravide tl•e em6ronmental services desarited in tl'is
prenasal, we st all devote aur full resaLiraes to the project and will ar r roaah it with tte t ighest degree of
enthusiasrr , objecti%iity, and professionalism r ossit le.
We sl all perform all via rl• clescril fl d in this I rat anal for an estimated budgle t of $232,895.00. TI is ofler is
%ialid for a period of sbity (64) clays. It s t ould t e empt a sized that tt ase casts a re t a sed Lir a n the
assumptians made on tte saope of the rroject; shot ild tta scare ctange signifiaantly, necessitating) a
change to the work program, we will contact yat.i immediately and amend batt tt a scope of serviaes and
estimated I tulglet accordingly.
Keeton K. Kreitzer, Principal, is tte individual authorized to bind tl a affer made above
(lflerPresented 8)I:
Keeton K. k re itzer, Princir a I
K £ETON KR£ITAER CONSUL TING
Date; April 30, 9 fl 0 9
Prapasal for Environmental Const Wing SllrWa! s (Re vise d)
Diatrda 1 a Na via NbiecI Use Project— da+i Jima Capistrano, CA
Agri! 38, 2( 0:
is
PAYMENT ROR %cIBRVICIES
Er v iiiar rric it tal Impact Relpciri JEIR)
Dis-Ato La Novia-San Juan Meadows
:lection I. Consultant Fee: 'The total lump sum compensation foi all services perfa nmed pursuant to
this agi Bement shall not exceed %32,895. Itis -lea shall include all costs inaLiried by the
CON SIULI AN I loi salary and out -a &pocket expenses foi ti aue I and miscellaneous expenses
neaessary to complete all mia rk specified in the "Elaa pe oil Woi k" (abit it it 'A").
Section II. Clontract Administiation and F ayment
A. F repayment by PIpplicant: I t e CIITY shall require tt at tt a applicant shall, Lipa n ememition al
this agreement, depa s it with the CIITY, additional BIR conte act ilunds which pi oxide a total a as h sum
of $232,899.
B. C lonsultant Payment Schedule: The City agi ee s to make progness pa)lrn ents to the
CIONEIL LTAINI aaaording to tt a following schedule:
Contract Amount
$232,895
Maximum
C lumula live
Aeraentage
Maximum Cumulallive
Paq,jecil Milesllone
Payment
Payment
Follav►iing completion of the Notice of Preparation
(NCIP) paocess, scaging meeting, and submissian of
the EIR q roject desa ription.
100/4
$23,290
During p re paration and a ompletia n o-1 the tea t n ical
reports and I during preparation ofl tt a So ree nc heck
draft EIR
80%
$186,316
Following s u t mission oil a ca m q tete Screencheck
Draft EIR.
85%
$197,961
Hollowing skit mission oil the put lic review Draft EIR.
90(x,
$209,606
During the public reviewi period on tl a draft HIR.
9a°/
$209,606
Following the submission of the Draft Fie sponses to
Comments, the Findings ofl Faat, and the Mitigation
N onitoning Program (N N P), and it a p plia a t le, the
State ment ol CWerriding Clonsideratians.
95%
$221,250
HalloHung slit mission o-lthe Final EIR.
100%
$232,895
32400 RASED ADKIJ NTO
SAN JUA1I CAPIA TRANO, CA 92675
(949) 493-1171
(949) 493-1053 FA)
wwx.3an juai Iaapisalan o. org
TRANS MITIAL
Flo:
V eellan Kneit-len, Rrincipal
P eellcin Kueit-len Cunsutl in g
17291 Irvine Blvd. 'Eluile 305
Mustin, CA 92780
aATIE: May 18, 2a09
MCMI ERS OF 7HB (I ITr COUNCIL
SAM ALLEVA TO
LAURA FROWN
THOMAS NL I IRIBAR
MAR1 I OW D
DR LONG RES USO
RROM: Clhuisly .lakl, Ad minis'l nail ive 9pecialisl, Clity Clerk's Officer i�949) 44 3-E 3'10
F H: PEirsanal 9eruices Agucerrienl — DBIA lar Clialui-lo Ua Navia-San Juan Meadaws
13avE110prrieni Puojecl
Thank you -lon mainlaining docurnieniation canfinming campliance with the -lenrnis of the
agreEimenl nEilated to insuuance.
RlEiasEi keep in mind chis dacumenialion musi nEimain curnEinl with aun ciffice dulling it a lenm cif
this agneemEint. 11 you havEi questions nelaied ici insunancEi nequinameinla, plEiasEi conlacl me al
(9� 9) � 43-6310.
11 you have quesiicins canceuning ite agraEimenl, plEiase ccintact William RamsEiy, Rnincipal
Rlannen 11949) 44 3-(133z.
An ariginal agiinarrienil is anclosEid lar your uecauds .
Clc: William Ramsey, Principal FllannEin
Skin Jtiati Ccpiswaitie: Preserving,he Pasil tc Enficince Me Fuiltire
qu IUinted n n 10191 rang<led paper
Today's Date:_ NEW 009
CONTRACT TRANSMITTALI
V911n:lmiitltad Rautinig
(CIF eck All) Tt a t Apg ly)
® Clity Atloi ney
® Cli-1 y N a n ages
® Clit)l CIIerF
CIR In o. (if any):
Poojecll N an age Ws Lasil Name: RPIMSBY RI one Exle nsion: 6334
clauncil air aRA Mee -ling Dale (ill applicable):
ARRROVING At 7t ORITY: 4CHGick One)
WMayor
CRA Clhair
i's Clily Managei
Rnovide (1) executed oniginal con -tract for each signing party, including the Citil. If tie agreement is to be
necoi ded — only (1) oniginal will t e necorded witt cer illied cop ies going io of hen par ies .
Rlease pw+ride J a mailing acidness of any party to neceive an agieemenl — unless the mailing acidness is
included within the bodil of the agneement:
07NEIR INS11RUC71ONS:
Rlease sign and lorwand to the ne)rl applicable departmen'I. Thank you.
Form [ atu 114404 Q - 7