The URL can be used to link to this page

19-0716_C.S. LEGACY CONSTRUCTION, INC._F2a_Attachment 2FINAL INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM VERDUGO STREET BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT June 2019 Lead Agency: _.,_ . . City of San Juan Capistrano 32400 Paseo Adelanto San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Prepared by: ECORP Consulting, Inc. ~~1119' ":'<\I ll N 11'..NTAL t'll 'Sl •LT •\ 'T S 1801 Parkcourt Place, B-103 Santa Ana, CA 92701 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 1of293 Verdugo Street Beautification Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration This page intentionally left blank ATTACHMENT 2, Page 2 of 293 Verdugo Street Beautification Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration VERDUGO STREET BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2019 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 3 of 293 Verdugo Street Beautification Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration This page intentionally left blank ATTACHMENT 2, Page 4 of 293 Verdugo Street Beautification Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration FINAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Verdugo Street Beautification Project Lead Agency: City of San Juan Capistrano Project Proponent: City of San Juan Capistrano Project Location: The Proposed Project is located in the city of San Juan Capistrano near the San Juan Capistrano Metrolink/Amtrak train depot and includes the entire length (approximately 300 lineal feet) of Verdugo Street from the intersection at Camino Capistrano to the cul-de-sac. Project Description: The Proposed Project would beautify the corridor and provide a more pedestrian-friendly street experience for visitors. The proposed improvements will include the following: • Reducing the overall width of the roadway; • Widening the sidewalks and adding rolled curbs; • Adding bulb-outs at intersection with Camino Capistrano; • Providing colored concrete and decorative pavers; • Modifications to existing storm drain catch basins; • Landscaping and irrigation; • Enhanced lighting and seating; and • Installing ADA ramps and improvements. Phasing of Project improvements will be coordinated to minimize construction impacts to the adjacent businesses and to maintain traffic flow and avoid to the extent practical conflicts with holidays and special events in the downtown area. Public Review Period: May 23, 2019 to June 11, 2019 Mitigation Measures Incorporated into the Project to Avoid Significant Effects: Biological Resources BI0-1: Migratory Bird Treaty Act. In the event that construction activities occur during the breeding season (February 15-August 15), the Applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a nesting bird survey within 5 days prior to commencement of construction activities. The nesting bird survey shall identify and document active nesting within 100 feet of the construction limits. If nesting birds are discovered during preconstruction surveys, the biologists shall identify an appropriate buffer (i.e., up to 500 feet depending on the circumstances and specific bird species) where no construction activities or other disturbances are allowed to occur until after the birds have fledged from the nest. Prior to commencement of grading activities and issuance of any building permits, the City of San Juan Capistrano Director of Development Services, or designee, shall verify that all project grading and construction plans include specific documentation regarding the requirements of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), that preconstruction surveys have been completed and the results reviewed by staff, and that the appropriate buffers (if needed) are noted on the plans and established in the field with orange snow fencing. 5 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 5 of 293 Verdugo Street Beautification Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Cultural Resources CUL-1: Archaeological Monitor. Prior to issuance of grading permits, and in adherence to the recommendations ofthe cultural resources records search, the Applicant shall retain, with approval of the City of San Juan Capistrano (City) Development Services Director, or designee, a qualified archaeological monitor. Monitoring by a qualified archaeologist should be conducted under the supervision of an Orange County Certified archaeologist and by a Native American monitor from one of the Juaf\eno groups recognized by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). Monitoring will be conducted in accordance with the City of San Juan Capistrano's Council Policy 601 on historic, archaeological, and paleontological resource management.1 The monitor shall be present on the project site during ground-disturbing activities to monitor rough and finish grading, excavation, and other ground-disturbing activities in the native soils. Because no cultural resources were identified on the project site, archaeological monitors are not required to be present on a full-time basis but shall spot check ground-disturbing activities to ensure that no cultural resources are impacted during construction activities. The exact timing of monitoring activities shall be consistent with the provisions established in the Monitoring Plan, which is required as part of Mitigation Measure CUL-2. CUL-2: Archaeological Monitoring Plan and Accidental Discovery. Prior to commencement of any grading activities on site, the Applicant shall retain a qualified archaeologist to prepare a Monitoring Plan. The Monitoring Plan shall be prepared by a qualified archaeologist and shall be reviewed by the City Development Services Director, or designee. The Monitoring Plan should include at a minimum: (1) a list of personnel involved in the monitoring activities; (2) a description of how the monitoring shall occur; (3) a description of the frequency of monitoring (e.g., full-time, part-time, spot checking); (4) a description of what resources may be encountered; (5) a description of circumstances that would result in the halting of work at the project site (e.g., what is considered a "significant" archaeological site); (6) a description of procedures for halting work on site and notification procedures; and (7) a description of monitoring reporting procedures. If any significant historical resources, archaeological resources, or human remains are found during monitoring, work shall be stopped within the immediate vicinity (precise area to be determined by the archaeologist in the field) of the resource until such time as the resource can be evaluated by an archaeologist and any other appropriate individuals. Project personnel shall not collect or move any archaeological materials or human remains and associated materials. To the extent feasible, project activities shall avoid these deposits. Where avoidance is not feasible, the archaeological deposits shall be evaluated for their eligibility for listing on the California Register of Historic Places. If the deposits are not eligible, avoidance is not necessary. If the deposits are eligible, adverse effects on the deposits must be avoided, or such effects must be mitigated. Mitigation can include, but is not necessarily limited to: leaving the deposits in place, excavation of the deposit in accordance with a data recovery plan (see California Code of Regulations [CCR] Title 4(3) Section 5126.4(b)(3)(C)) and standard archaeological field methods and procedures; laboratory and technical analyses of recovered archaeological materials; production of a report detailing the methods, findings, and significance of the archaeological site and associated materials; curation of archaeological materials at an appropriate facility for future research and/or display; an interpretive display of recovered archaeological materials at a local school, museum, or library; and public lectures at local schools and/or historical societies on the findings and significance of the site and recovered archaeological materials. It shall be the responsibility of the City Building Official, or designee, to verify that the Monitoring Plan is implemented during project excavation and grading. Upon completion of all monitoring/mitigation activities, the consulting archaeologist shall submit a monitoring report to the City Development Services Director, or designee, and to the South-Central Coastal Information Center summarizing all monitoring/mitigation activities and confirming that all recommended mitigation measures have been met. The monitoring report shall be 6 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 6 of 293 Verdugo Street Beautification Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared consistent with the guidelines of the Office of Historic Preservation's Archaeological Resources Management Reports (ARMR): Recommended Contents and Format. The City Development Services Director, or designee, shall be responsible for reviewing any reports produced by the archaeologist to determine the appropriateness and adequacy of the findings and recommendations. CUL-3: Human Remains. Consistent with the requirements of CCR Section 15064.5(e), if human remains are encountered during site disturbance, grading, or other construction activities on the project site, the construction contractor shall halt work within 25 feet of the discovery; all work shall be redirected and the Orange County (County) Coroner notified immediately. No further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. If the remains are determined to be Native American, the County Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). The MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD shall complete the inspection within 48 hours of notification by the NAHC. The MLD may recommend scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials. Consistent with CCR Section 15064.5(d}, if the remains are determined to be Native American and an MLD is notified, the City shall consult with the MLD identified by the NAHC to develop an agreement for the treatment and disposition of the remains . Upon completion of the assessment, the consulting archaeologist shall prepare a report documenting the methods and results and provide recommendations regarding the treatment of the human remains and any associated cultural materials, as appropriate, and in coordination with the recommendations of the MLD . The report shall be submitted to the City Development Services Director, or designee, and the South-Central Coastal Information Center. The City Development Services Director, or designee, shall be responsible for reviewing any reports produced by the archaeologist to determine the appropriateness and adequacy of the findings and recommendations. Geology and Soils GE0-1: Compliance with Geotechnical Investigations. These studies shall be submitted for review and approval by the City of San Juan Capistrano City Engineer, or designee, to ensure that future development has been evaluated at an appropriate level of detail by a professional geologist. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the City Engineer shall confirm that all grading and construction plans incorporate and comply with the recommendations included in the Final Geotechnical Report. Design, grading, and construction shall adhere to all oft he seismic requirements incorporated into the most current version of the California Building Code (CBC) and the requirements and standards contained in the applicable chapters of the City of San Juan Capistrano Municipal Code, as well as appropriate local grading regulations, and the specifications of the project geotechnical consultant. Tribal Cultural Resources TCR-1: Prior to commencement of any ground-disturbing activities, the City will assure that a qualified Native American monitor has been retained to provide Native American monitoring services during ground-disturbing activities in native soils. Because no known resources have been identified on the site, monitors are not required on a full-time basis, but shall spot check ground-disturbing activities in compliance with the monitoring procedures outlined in the Monitoring Plan (which itself is required as part of Mitigation Measure CUL-2) to ensure that no resources are impacted during construction. The Native American monitor shall be selected by the project Archaeologist in coordination with the Juanef\o Band of Mission Indians Acjachemen 7 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 7 of 293 Verdugo Street Beautification Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Nation. The Native American monitor shall be present at the pre-grading conference to establish procedures for tribal cultural resource surveillance. Those procedures shall include provisions for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit sampling, identification, and evaluation of resources deemed by the Native American monitor to be tribal cultural resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074. These procedures shall be reviewed and approved by the City of San Juan Capistrano Community Department Director, or designee, prior to commencement of any surface disturbance on the project site. 8 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 8 of 293 Verdugo Street Beautification Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration TABLE OF CONTENTS Final Mitigated Negative Declaration -Verdugo Street Beautification Project ........................................ 5 Mitigation Measures Incorporated into the Project to Avoid Significant Effects ......................................... 5 TA BL E OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................................................................... 9 SECTION 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 11 SECTION 2. Project Overview ...................................................................................................................... 13 SECTION 3. Comments and Responses ....................................................................................................... 15 SECTION 4. Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program ....................................................................... 24 9 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 9 of 293 Verdugo Street Beautification Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration This page intentionally left blank 10 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 10 of 293 Verdugo Street Beautification Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION This document is the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Final IS/MND) including the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP) for the Verdugo Street Beautification Project (Proposed Project). This Final IS/MND has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resource Code Section 21000 et. seq .) and the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations Section 15000 et seq .), as amended. This Final IS/MND supplements and updates the Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Draft IS/MND) released for public review on May 23 , 2019 . The Draft IS/MND is incorporated into this Final IS/MND by reference. The City of San Juan Capistrano is the Lead Agency for the Proposed Project. On May 23, 2019 the City of San Juan Capistrano distributed the Draft IS/MND for the Proposed Project to the general public for review and comment. The document was not sent to the State Clearinghouse as there were no state approvals required . The 20-day review period ended on June 11, 2019. During the public review period, four (4) comment letters were received. A public meeting will be held on June 25, 2019 at the San Juan Capistrano City Hall. This Final IS/MND and MMRP document is organized as follows: • Section 1.0 provides a discussion of the purpose of the document and discusses the structure of the document; • Section 2.0 contains a summary of the project description; and • Section 3.0 contains the comments received on the Draft IS/MND and responses to comments; • Section 4.0 includes the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP). This Final IS/MND and MMRP document and the Draft IS/MND together constitute the environmental document for the Proposed Project. 11 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 11of293 Verdugo Street Beautification Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration This page intentionally left blank 12 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 12 of 293 Verdugo Street Beautification Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration SECTION 2. PROJECT OVERVIEW 2.1 Project Location and Site Description The project site is located in the city of San Juan Capistrano near the San Juan Capistrano Metrolink/Amtrak train depot and includes the entire length (approximately 300 lineal feet) of Verdugo Street from the intersection at Camino Capistrano to the cul-de-sac. The site is east ofthe historic Los Rios district and is within the City's Historic Town Center . The existing paved street has commercial businesses and concrete sidewalks on both sides and the street terminates at the train depot and a parking structure. There are existing utilities w ithin the street and sidewalk that include domestic water, gas, sewer, storm drain, electrical services, AT&T and Cox Communications, and traffic control devices. The existing streetscape includes mostly concrete and paver sidewalks with sparse trees and plants. 2.2 Project Description The Verdugo Street Beautification Project ('Project') is intended to beautify the street corridor and provide a more pedestrian-friendly street experience for visitors. The proposed improvements will include the following: • Reducing the overall width of the roadway; • Widening the sidewalks and adding rolled curbs; • Adding bulb-outs at intersection with Camino Capistrano; • Providing colored concrete and decorative pavers; • Modifications to existing storm drain catch basins; • Landscaping and irrigation; • Enhanced lighting and seating; and • Installing ADA ramps and improvements. A key theme in the design of the Verdugo Street Beautification Project is to provide an inviting street corridor that will create a sense of arrival for visitors arriving by train, as well as those parking and walking to restaurants, the movie theatre and shops downtown . The design minimizes the use of standard curbs, and the roadways would be defined primarily by planter pots and bollards. The reduced street widths and widened sidewalks, provide a more pedestrian-focused experience with options for sidewalk dining and possibly temporary street closures for special events. Paving in the street and sidewalks would be enhanced utilizing colored or washed concrete, pavers, or a combination of both. Wood benches would provide seating while street trees would provide natural shade. Additional improvements will include planters with landscaping and enhanced (bistro) lights. New ADA improvements will join the existing sidewalks at all Project intersections, principally Camino Capistrano and Verdugo Street. The cul-de-sac at this location is reduced from an existing 30' radius to a 25' radius and Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) has reviewed and approved the proposed plans. With the reduction in the cul-de-sac, a new catch basin is proposed to replace the existing catch basin, thus ensuring the new curb and gutter alignment drains properly. Street improvements will ensure proper drainage design for new curb and gutter, and sidewalk within the entire Project limits. Project improvements will be coordinated with all existing utilities within the Project limits. Phasing of Project improvements will be coordinated to minimize construction impacts to the adjacent businesses and to maintain traffic flow and avoid to the extent practical conflicts with holidays and special events in the downtown area. Implementation of street improvements is expected in summer/fall of 2019 . 13 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 13 of 293 Verdugo Street Beautification Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 2.3 Lead Agency Permits and Approvals The City of San Juan Capistrano is the Lead Agency and project proponent. The proposed Project will require the following agency permits and approvals: City Council approval of Capital Improvement (CIP} 14106; Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) (Metrolink) approval of detailed plans and construction. 14 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 14 of 293 Verdugo Street Beautification Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration SECTION 3. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES This section contains copies of the Verdugo Street Beautification Project comment letters received during the 20-day local public review period, which began on May 23, 2019 and ended on June 11, 2019. In conformance with Section 15088(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City of San Juan Capistrano has considered comments on environmental issues from reviewers of the Draft IS/MND and has prepared written responses . Four letters were received, commenting on the Draft IS/MND. The comments received do not raise substantial environmental issues as to the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND. A public meeting to consider approval of the Proposed Project and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration has been scheduled for June 25, 2019 at San Juan Capistrano City Hall. The letters received and the responses to the comments contained in the letters are provided in this section. 3.1 List of Comment Letters A list of public agencies, organizations, and individuals that provided comments on the Draft IS/MND is presented below. The letters and the responses to the comments follow this page. Letter Number Sender Date Received 1 Orange County Transit Authority 6/11/2019 2 County of Orange 6/11/2019 3 Orange County Fire Authority 6/11/2019 4 Southern California Regional Rail Authority 6/11/2019 15 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 15 of 293 Verdugo Street Beautification Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Letter 1-Orange County Transportation Authority, received June 11, 2019 m OCTA BOARD OF DIRECTORS 11m ShJIV Chairman Sle11t1JQflf.!S Vice Chairm;m Lisa A tJantell Dirticlor Doog Cl1affe11 Direc:lor Lilun'tJ DH111es Dirsclor 8i1 11.Jara OtJ~itfiw Dircclnt Andrew Do Dkecror Michael l-lennessay Director Gene Hemande:r Diroc/or Jose F. Moreno Di reel or JOR Mullftr Diroc1or M;irkA MU!phy Diteclor Richard Murphy D1teclor MiouelPu!ido DinJctor AtlicJ1fllleSlerN Dirai=tnr DomtlrlP Wc1!)'11"' Diror.rnr Gwgory T. l,tVln/erbollom Dire cl or Ry.an Chamborlain Ex-Off1eio Member ;H/EF EXECUTIVE OFFICE Dnm1/I E Jnhn,o;on Chiel Execulive Otlicer June 11, 2019 Mr. Joe Parco City Engineer City of San Juan Capistrano 32400 Paseo Adelanto San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Subject: Notice of Intent to Adopt an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Verdugo Street Beautification Project Dear Mr. Parco: Thank you for providing the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) wi1h the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Verdugo Street Beautification Project (Project). The following comments are provided for your consideration: Camino Capistrano is planned as a secondary arterial highway (four-lane, undivided} on the Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) and is currently built as a two-lane facili1y . Please address potential right-of-way conflicts introduced on Camino Capistrano by the proposed bulb-outs that appear to preclude buildout of the planned secondary configuration . Any roadway reclassifications, or other agreements wi1h OCTA, necessary to maintain consistency with the MPAH should be completed prior to implementing any elements that would preclude the planned configuration. More information on the MPAH and guidance for administration of the MPAH is located on the OCTA website (https:l/www.octa.neVNews-and-Resources/Open-Data/MPAH-Overview/). Additionally, OCTA owns the rail right-of-way (ROW). Should there be work adjacent to the rail line or any improvements at or near the railroad crossing, please coordinate with OCTA to ensure minimal disruption to the Amtrak/Metrolink service. For improvements within OCTA ROW, we also request that the City of San Juan Capistrano coordinate with OCTA during the design phase and amend the existing license agreement as needed . Orange Cour11y Transportation Autl1ority 550 South Main Straat I PrO, Box 14184 IOranQB /California 92863-1584 /(714l 560·0CTA (6282J 16 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 16 of 293 Verdugo Street Beautification Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Mr. Joe Parco June 11, 2019 Page2 Throughout the development of this project, we encourage communication with OCTA on any matters discussed herein. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me at (714) 560-5907 or at dphu@octa.net. Sincerely, ;ffa--71-- Dan Phu Manager, Environmental Programs Letter 1 Response to Comments This letter addresses the relationship of the Proposed Project design and the classification of Camino Capistrano as a secondary arterial highway on the Master Plan of Arterial Highways. The City discussed the proposed plan and comments with OCTA staff and resolved OCT A's comment regarding the potential right of way conflicts introduced on Camino Capistrano by the proposed bulbouts that appear to preclude buildout of a secondary arterial highway. As a result of the discussion, OCTA has indicated that the proposed improvements on Camino Capistrano do not introduce any right of way impacts. The City will coordinate any work adjacent to the rail line or any improvements at or near the final railroad crossing with OCTA to ensure minimal disruption to Amtrak/Metrolink service. The City will coordinate with OCTA during the design phase should any improvements be needed with the OCTA ROW. 17 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 17 of 293 Verdugo Street Beautification Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Letter 2 -County of Orange, Received June 11, 2019 r ' . \\:,1 ( Public Works Integrity, Accountability, Service, Trust Shane L. Siisby, Director June 11, 2019 Joe Parco, City Engineer City of San Juan Capistrano 32400 Pasco Adelanto San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 e NCL-19-020 Subject: Intent to Adopt an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Verdugo Street Beautification Project. Dear Mr. Joe Parco: The County of Orange has reviewed !he Initial Study and the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Verdugo Street Beautification Project and has no comments at this time. We would like to be advised of further developments on the project. Please continue to keep us on the distribution list for future notifications related to the project. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Cindy Salazar at (714) 667- 8870 in OC Development Se1vices. Riclmrd Vuong, Manager, Planning Division OC Public Works Service Area/QC Development Services 300 North Flower Street Santa Ana, California 92702-4048 Richard. Vuong(a Jocnw.ocAo\•.com 300 N. Rower Streel, Sanla Ana, CA 92703 P.O. Box 4048, Santa Ana, CA 92702-4048 Letter 2 Response to Comments www ocpublicworks com 714 667.8800 I lnfo@OCPW.ocgov.com This letter indicates the County of Orange has no comments on the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration. The City will keep the County on the distribution list for future project notifications. 18 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 18 of 293 Verdugo Street Beautification Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Letter 3 -Orange County Fire Authority, Received June 11, 2019 ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY P. 0. Box 57115, Irvine, CA 92619-7115 1 Fire Authority Way, Irvine, CA 92602 Brian Fennessy, Fire Chief• www.ocfa.org • (714) 573-6000 I Fax (714) 368-8843 June 10, 2019 City of San Juan Capistrano Attn: Joe Parco, City Engineer 32400 Paseo Adelanto San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Ref: Notice of Intent to Adopt Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Verdugo Street Beautification Project Dear Joe Parco: Thank you for the opportunity to review the subject The Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) provides fire protection and emergency medical services response to the project area. Services include: structural fire protection, emergency medical and rescue services, education and hazardous material response. The equipment used by the department has the versatility to respond to both urban and wildland emergency conditions We have the following comments regarding the subject document: • The current radius of the cul-de-sac does not meet OCFA minimum radius requirements, further reduction of the radius will hinder emergency access. Access should meet the standards outlined in OCFA's Guideline B-09 at www.ocfa.org. • The bulb outs, although not dimensioned in the subject document, must comply with access requirements for fire apparatus and personnel. The project area shall meet the minimum development standards of the OCFA and California Fire Code requirements. Please reference OCFA's Guideline B-09 at www.ocfa.org . • If the project scope includes or requires the installation of traffic signals on public access ways, these improvements shall include the installation of optical preemption devices. In addition, we would like to point out that all standard conditions with regard to development, including water supply, built in fire protection systems, road grades and width, access, building materials, and the like will be applied to this project at the time of plan submittal. Thank you for providing us with this information. Please contact me at 714-573-6199 if you have any questions. Serving lhe Cities of •Aliso Viejo • Buena Park • cypress • Dana Poiot • llvioe • Lasuoa Hills • Laguna Niguel • Laguna Woods • Lake Forest • La Palma • Los Alemitos • Mission Vi~o • Plecenli.a • Rancho Santa Morgwile • SllD Clemente • Se.n Jueo Capistrano • Seal Beech • Stmta Ana • stanlon • Tustin • VJ.11oPork • Wesimiuster • Yorbe.Linda • andUniocorpomtedAreasofOmnge County RESIDENTIAL SPRINKLERS AND SMOKE DETECTORS SAVE LIVES 19 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 19 of 293 Verdugo Street Beautification Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Verdugo Street Beautification Project Sincerely, Tamera Rivers Management Analyst Strategic Services Section tamyrivers@ocfaorg 714-573-6199 Letter 3 Response to Comments Page2 June 10, 2019 This letter identifies Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) fire protection and emergency medical services provided to the project area and comments on design standards to facilitate OCFA access to and through the project site City staff has provided the project design plans depicting fire truck turning templates to OCFA. OCFA has reviewed and approved the proposed plans. City plan submittals will comply with the identified OCFA development standards. 20 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 20 of 293 Verdugo Street Beautification Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Letter 4 -Southern California Regional Rail Authority, Received June 11, 2019 METRO LIN I(. SOU I HERN CALIFORNIA REGION/IL RAIL AUTHORITY 900 Wilshire Blvd Suite 1500 Lo s Angeles, CA 90017 metrollnktralns.com ................................... -------------------------- June 11, 2019 Joe Parco City Engineer City of San Juan Capistrano 32400 Paseo Adelanto San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 RE: Notice of Intent (NOi) to Adopt an Initial Study (IS) and a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Verdugo Street Beautification Project Dear Mr. Parco: The Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) has received the NOi for the IS/MND on the Verdugo Street Beautification Project in the City of San Juan Capistrano. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on key issues relative to SCRRA and operations of the railroad adjacent to the project site. As background information, SCRRA is a five-county Joint Powers Authority (JPA) that operates the regional commuter rail system known as Metrolink. Additionally, SCRRA provides rail engineering, construction, operations and maintenance services to its five JPA member agencies. The JPA consists of the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA), Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) and Ventura County Transportation Commission (VCTC). The railroad right of way immediately adjacent to the project is owned by OCTA and operated and maintained by SCRRA. We are encouraged to see that the City of San Juan Capistrano is investing into pedestrian and visual enhancements around the train station and crossing. We feel this is a good opportunity to incorporate some safety enhancements within the limits of the project to ensure safe access across the track at Verdugo Street. With the theme of safety in mind, SCRRA would like to offer the following general comments: 1. Currently there are 17 weekday Metrolink and 35 Amtrak daily passenger trains that operate through this area in addition to 4-6 BNSF freight trains. Trains can run 24 hours a day seven days a week and schedules are subject to change . 2. Safety of the railroad right of way is of utmost importance and these improvements must be constructed safely around the railroad right of way. It appears that new pavers and landscaping may be installed within fouling distance of the track 21 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 21 of 293 Verdugo Street Beautification Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Verdugo Street Beautification Project IS/MND Page 2 ................................... ----------------------- centerline. The detailed plans and construction would need to be approved by SCRRA Engineering Department. SCRRA Right of Way Encroachment Procedures, Standards and Forms can be found on the Metrolink website at www .metro linktralns.com . SCRRA should be named in your document as an agency requiring approvals from. Plans for the site should be sent to SCRRA Engineering Department at the following address: SCRRA Engineering Department Attn: Joseph McNeely, Principal Engineer 2558 Supply Street Pomona, CA 91767 3. Other safety enhancements to be considered around the Station in Phase 1 include the following: a. The existing yellow stripe on the pavers at the location where the railroad gates come down needs to remain or be enhanced to let pedestrians know to keep clear of the railroad gate arms as they descend for the approach of trains. In addition to the striping, if new pavers are being installed you may want to consider also using a 2' -3' row of contrasting pavers in line with the railroad warning gate to let people know not to stand in the path of the gate arm, so it does not strike them as it descends. b. A 3' x 5' pad of yellow truncated domes should be added in front of the emergency swing gate for ADA needs on the east side of the tracks. c. The existing railroad rubber panels are old and should be considered for replacement with new concrete style panels with rubber inserts at the same time as the paver work. d. Consider replacing the worn, faded and outdated station signage with the new Metrolink logo. e. 2' wide yellow truncated domes are required the entire length of the edge of platform with yellow clearance striping with the words "PLEASE WAIT BEHIND YELLOW LINE" stenciled per SCRRA Engineering Standard (ES) 3203. f. Any trees or large landscaping treatments shall be placed as not to block the line of sight of the automatic warning devices to advise pedestrians of oncoming trains. 22 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 22 of 293 Verdugo Street Beautification Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Verdugo Street Beautification Project IS/MND Page 3 ................................... ----------------------- 4. Phase 2 enhancements on the west side of the tracks should include the following : a. Yellow truncated domes in front of the railroad warning gate for the entire length of the crossing. b. A 3' x 5' pad of yellow truncated domes needs to be added in front of the emergency swing gate for ADA needs . City shall provide timely notice, in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21092 .5 and State CEQA Guideline Section 15088, of the written proposed responses to our comments on this environmental document and the time and place of any scheduled public meetings or public hearings by the agency decision makers at least 1 O days prior to such a meeting . Thank you again for cooperating with SCRRA to help ensure the development of a successful project. If you have any questions regarding these comments , please contact Joe McNeely at (909) 392-8723 or via e-ma il at mcneelyl@scrra .net. Sincerely , 4-!1JfJD Ron Mathieu Planning Manager II Cc : Roderick Diaz , SCRRA Joe McNeely, SCRRA Dinah Minteer, OCTA Letter 4 Response to Comments This letter provides background information on the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) organizational structure, authority, regional services and train operations in the project vicinity. Several recommendations are suggested for potential safety enhancements at or near the railroad right-of-way adjacent the project site . The City will incorporate into the design plans recommendations 3a, 3b, 3e and 3f. However, recommendations 3c and 3d are beyond the project's scope and will not be incorporated. Recommendations 4a and 4b are beyond the project limit and will not be incorporated. By not constructing these recommendations the City will still be in compliance with CEQA guidelines. All other review and approvals required by SCRRA as described in the comment letter will be adhered to. The City will review detailed project plans and construction near the rail ROW with SCRRA Engineering Department for any necessary approvals. SCRRA is hereby added to the IS/MND as an agency from whom approvals may be required. The City also appreciates the recommended Phase 1 and Phase 2 safety enhancements and will coordinate with SCRRA in addressing the implementation of these enhancements. ATTACHMENT 2 , Page 23 of 293 Verdugo Street Beautification Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration SECTION 4. MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 4.1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Public Resources Code (PRC} Section 21081.6 (enacted by the passage of Assembly Bill [AB] 3180) mandates that the following requirements shall apply to all reporting or mitigation monitoring programs: • The public agency shall adopt a reporting or monitoring program for the changes made to the project or conditions of project approval in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment. The reporting or monitoring program shall be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation. For those changes which have been required or incorporated into the project at the request of a Responsible Agency or a public agency having jurisdiction by law over natural resources affected by the project, that agency shall, if so requested by the Lead Agency or a Responsible Agency, prepare and submit a proposed reporting or monitoring program. • The Lead Agency shall specify the location and custodian of the documents or other material, which constitute the record of proceedings upon which its decision is based. A public agency shall provide the measures to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment that are fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other measures. Conditions of project approval may be set forth in referenced documents which address required mitigation measures or in the case of the adoption of a plan, policy, regulation, or other project, by incorporating the mitigation measures into the plan, policy, regulation, or project design. • Prior to the close of the public review period for a draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), a Responsible Agency, or a public agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by the project, shall either submit to the Lead Agency complete and detailed performance objectives for mitigation measures which would address the significant effects on the environment identified by the Responsible Agency or agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by the project, or refer the Lead Agency to appropriate, readily available guidelines or reference documents. Any mitigation measures submitted to a Lead Agency by a Responsible Agency or an agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by the project shall be limited to measures that mitigate impacts to resources, which are subject to the statutory authority of, and definitions applicable to, that agency. Compliance or noncompliance by a Responsible Agency or agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by a project with that requirement shall not limit that authority of the Responsible Agency or agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by a project, or the authority of the Lead Agency, to approve, condition, or deny projects as provided by this division or any other provision of law. 24 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 24 of 293 Verdugo Street Beautification Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 4.2 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Procedures The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) has been prepared in compliance with PRC Section 21081.6. It describes the requirements and procedures to be followed by the City of San Juan Capistrano to ensure that all mitigation measures adopted as part of the proposed project will be carried out as described in this IS/MND. Table 5.2-1 lists each of the mitigation measures specified in this document and identifies the party or parties responsible for implementation and monitoring of each measure. 25 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 25 of 293 Verdugo Street Beautification Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Table S.2-1. Verdugo Street Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Timing for Standard Compliance Condition or Verification (Date and Mitigation Meas ures Responsible Pa rty Mitigation Measure Si g nature Required) 4.1 Aesthetics The proposed project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to aesthetics. No mitigation would be required. 4.2 Agricultural & Forest Resources The proposed project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to agriculture and forest resources. No mitigation would be required. 4.3 Air Quality The proposed project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to air quality. No mitigation would be required. 4.4 Biological Resources BI0-1 Migratory Bird Treaty Act. In the event that construction City of San Juan In the event that activities occur during the breeding season (February 15-August 15), the Capistrano Development construction activities Applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a nesting bird survey Services Director, or occur during the breeding within 5 days prior to commencement of construction activities. The designee season (February 15- nesting bird survey shall identify and document active nesting within 100 August 15)/ Prior to feet of the construction limits. If nesting birds are discovered during commencement of preconstruction surveys, the biologists shall identify an appropriate buffer grading activities and (i.e .. up to 500 feet depending on the circumstances and specific bird issuance of any building species) where no construction activities or other disturbances are permits. allowed to occur until after the birds have fledged from the nest. Prior to commencement of grading activities and issuance of any building permits, the City of San Juan Capistrano Director of Development Services, or designee, shall verify that all project grading and construction plans include specific documentation regarding the requirements of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), that preconstruction surveys have been completed and the results reviewed by staff, and that the appropriate buffers (if needed) are noted on the plans and established in the field with orange snow fencing. 26 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 26 of 293 Verdugo Street Beautification Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Timing for S tandard Compliance Condition or Verification (Date and Mitigation Me as ures Res po nsi ble Party Mitigation M eas ure Signature Required) 4.5 Cultural Resources CUL-1: Archaeological Monitor. Prior to issuance of grading permits, City of San Juan Prior to issuance of and in adherence to the recommendations of the cultural resources Capistrano Development grading permits records search, the Applicant shall retain, with approval of the City of San Services Director, or Juan Capistrano (City) Development Services Director, or designee, a designee qualified archaeological monitor. Monitoring by a qualified archaeologist should be conducted under the supervision of an Orange County Certified archaeologist and by a Native American monitor from one of the Juaneno groups recognized by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). Monitoring will be conducted in accordance with the City of San Juan Capistrano's Council Policy 601 on historic, archaeological, and paleontological resource management.' The monitor shall be present on the project site during ground-disturbing activities to monitor rough and finish grading, excavation, and other ground-disturbing activities in the native soils. Because no cultural resources were identified on the project site, archaeological monitors are not required to be present on a full-time basis but shall spot check ground-disturbing activities to ensure that no cultural resources are impacted during construction activities. The exact timing of monitoring activities shall be consistent with the provisions established in the Monitoring Plan, which is required as part of Mitigation Measure CUL-2. CUL-2: Archaeological Monitoring Plan and Accidental Discovery. Prior to City of San Juan Prior to commencement commencement of any grading activities on site, the Applicant shall retain Capistrano Development of any grading activities a qualified archaeologist to prepare a Monitoring Plan. The Monitoring Services Director, or on site/During project Plan shall be prepared by a qualified archaeologist and shall be reviewed designee/ City excavation and grading by the City Development Services Director, or designee. The Monitoring Department of Public activities Plan should include at a minimum: (1) a list of personnel involved in the Works and Utilities monitoring activities; (2) a description of how the monitoring shall occur; Director, or designee (3) a description of the frequency of monitoring (e.g .. full-time, part-time, spot checking); (4) a description of what resources may be encountered; (5) a description of circumstances that would result in the halting of work at the project site (e.g., what is considered a "significant" archaeological 27 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 27 of 293 Verdugo Street Beautification Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration site); (6) a description of procedures for halting work on site and notification procedures; and (7) a description of monitoring reporting procedures. If any significant historical resources, archaeological resources, or human remains are found during monitoring, work shall be stopped within the immediate vicinity (precise area to be determined by the archaeologist in the field) of the resource until such time as the resource can be evaluated by an archaeologist and any other appropriate individuals. Project personnel shall not collect or move any archaeological materials or human remains and associated materials. To the extent feasible, project activities shall avoid these deposits. Where avoidance is not feasible, the archaeological deposits shall be evaluated for their eligibility for listing on the California Register of Historic Places. If the deposits are not eligible, avoidance is not necessary. If the deposits are eligible, adverse effects on the deposits must be avoided, or such effects must be mitigated. Mitigation can include, but is not necessarily limited to: leaving the deposits in place, excavation of the deposit in accordance with a data recovery plan (see California Code of Regulations [CCR] Title 4(3) Section 5126.4(b)(3)(C)) and standard archaeological field methods and procedures; laboratory and technical analyses of recovered archaeological materials; production of a report detailing the methods, findings, and significance of the archaeological site and associated materials; cu ration of archaeological materials at an appropriate facility for future research and/or display; an interpretive display of recovered archaeological materials at a local school, museum, or library; and public lectures at local schools and/or historical societies on the findings and significance of the site and recovered archaeological materials. It shall be the responsibility of the City Building Official, or designee, to verify that the Monitoring Plan is implemented during project excavation and grading. Upon completion of all monitoring/mitigation activities, the consulting archaeologist shall submit a monitoring report to the City Development Services Director, or designee, and to the South-Central Coastal Information Center summarizing all monitoring/mitigation activities and confirming that all recommended mitigation measures have been met. The monitoring report shall be prepared consistent with the guidelines of the Office of Historic Preservation's Archaeological Resources Management Reports (ARMR): Recommended Contents and Format. The City Development Services Director, or desi1mee , shall be resoonsible for 28 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 28 of 293 Verdugo Street Beautification Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration reviewing any reports produced by the archaeologist to determine the appropriateness and adequacy of the findings and recommendations. CUL-3: Human Remains. Consistent with the requirements of CCR City of San Juan If human remains are Section 15064.5(e), if human remains are encountered during site Capistrano Development encountered during site disturbance, grading, or other construction activities on the project site, Services Director, or disturbance, grading, or the construction contractor shall halt work within 25 feet of the discovery; deslgnee other construction all work shall be redirected and the Orange County (County) Coroner activities on the project notified immediately. No further disturbance shall occur until the County site Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097 .98. If the remains are determined to be Native American, the County Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). The MLD may Inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD shall complete the inspection wlthlri 48 hours of notification by the NAHC. The MLD may recommend scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials. Consistent with CCR Section 15064.5(d), if the remains are determined to be Native American and an MLD is notified, the City shall consult with the MLD identified by the NAHC to develop an agreement for the treatment and disposition of the remains. Upon completion of the assessment, the consulting archaeologist shall prepare a report documenting the methods and results and provide recommendations regarding the treatment of the human remains and any associated cultural materials, as appropriate, and in coordination with the recommendations of the MLD. The report shall be submitted to the City Development Services Director, or deslgnee, and the South-Central Coastal Information Center. The City Development Services Director, or designee, shall be responsible for reviewing any reports produced by the archaeologist to determine the appropriateness and adequacy of the findings and recommendations . 4.6 Energy The proposed project wou ld not result in significant adverse impacts related to energy. No mitigation is required . 29 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 29 of 293 Verdugo Street Beautification Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Timing for Standard Compliance Condition or Verification (Date and Mitigation Measures Responsible Party Mitigation Measure Signature Required) 4.7 Geo1011.1111nd so11s GE0-1: Compllance with Geotechnkal Investigations. These studies sha ll City of San Juan Prior to issuance of be submitted for review and approval by the City of San Juan Capistrano Capistrano Engineer, or grading permits City Engineer, or designee, to ensure that future development has been designee evaluated at an appropriate level of detail by a professional geologist . Prior to issuance of grading permits, the City Engineer shall confirm that all grading and construction plans incorporate and comply with the recommendations included in the Final Geotechnical Report. Design, grading, and construction shall adhere to all of the seismic requirements incorporated into the most current version of the California Building Code (CBC) and the requirements and standards contained in the applicable chapters of the City of San Juan Capistrano Municipal Code, as well as appropriate local grading regulations, and the specifications of the project geotechnlca l consult<mt . 4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissi ons The proposed project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to greenhouse gas emissi on s. No mi t igation would be requ ired. ii19 111tais r!15 :antl:ltt&;m db.!.(s Material$ The proposed project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials. No mitigation would be requ ired . 4.lp Hvdr.olol!V,and Water Qualltv The proposed project would not result In significant advers e impacts re lat ed to Hydrology and Water Quali ty . No mltlgal'ion would be required. 4111 tand Use/Plan The proposed project would not result in significant adverse impacts related t o Land Use and Plarin lng . No mit igati on would be required. 4';'.!Wll'l:illlui:tel Bi!S:IWl'l!n The proposed project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to mineral resou rces . No mitigation would be required, ;i.1a tijolS·e The proposed project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to noise. No mitigation would be requ ired. 30 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 30 of 293 Verdugo Street Beautification Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Timing for Standard Compliance Condition or Verification (Date and Mitigation Measures Responsible Party Mitigation Measure Signature Required) IU4 1'011u111tlo11 and Hous,lng , The proposed project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to population and housing . No mitigation would be required. 4.15 Public Services and Utilities The proposed project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to public services and utilities. No mitigation would be required . 4.16 Recreation The proposed project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to recreation. No mitigation would be required. 4.17 Tfansportatlim/ifrafflc The proposed project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to transportation/traffic. No mitigation would be required 4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources TCR-1. Prior to commencement of any ground-disturbing activities, the Director of the City of Prior to commencement City will assure that a qualified Native American monitor has been San Juan Capistrano of any ground disturbing retained to provide Native American monitoring services during ground-Community activities disturbing activities in native soils . Because no known resources have been Development identified on the site, monitors are not required on a full-time basis, but Department, or designee shall spot check ground-disturbing activities in compliance with the monitoring procedures outlined in the Monitoring Plan (which itself is required as part of Mitigation Measure CUL-2) to ensure that no resources are impacted during construction. The Native American monitor shall be selected by the project Archaeologist in coordination with the Juanei'io Band of Mission Indians Acjachemen Nation. The Native American monitor shall be present at the pre-grading conference to establish procedures for tribal cultural resource surveillance. Those procedures shall include provisions for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit sampling, identification, and evaluation of resources deemed by the Native American monitor to be tribal cultural resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074. These procedures shall be reviewed and approved by the City of San Juan Capistrano Community Department Director, or designee, prior to commencement of any surface disturbance on the project site. 31 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 31 of 293 Verdugo Street Beautification Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Timing for Standard Compliance Condition or Verification (Date and Mitigation Measures Responsible Party Mitigation Measure Signature Required) 4.19 Utlll!le~/Sl!rvt(.e'S~tem . The proposed project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to Ut ilities/Servi ce Systems. No mitigation woul(I be requlre(l . 4~20WIJClflre The proposed project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to wildfire. No mitlli.atlon wotild be req uired. 32 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 32 of 293 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 33 of 293 Print Form ··'J Appendix C Notice of Completion & Environmental Document Transmittal Mail to: State Clearinghouse, P.O. Box 3044, Sacramento, CA 95812-3044 (916) 445-0613 For Hand Delivery/Street Address: 1400 Tenth Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 SCH#N/A Project Title: Verdugo Street Beautification Leatl Agency: City of San Juan Capistrano Mailing Address: 32400 Paseo Adelanto Contact Person: Joe Parco -----------~ Phone: (949) 443-6353 City: San Juan Capistrano Zip:92675 County: Orange County -----------------------------------Project Location: County:Orange County City/Nearest Community: _S_an_J_ua_n_C_a~p_is_tr_a_no _______ _ Cross Streets: Verdugo Street, Camino Capistrano Zip Code: _92_6-'7-'5;__ __ Longitude/Latitude (degrees, minutes and seconds): ~0 ~~"NI .!...!l._0 ~· 47.2 "W Total Acres: NIA --------Assessor's Parcel No.: NIA Section: NIA Twp.: NIA Range: N/A Base: NIA ----Within 2 Miles: St!lte Hwy#: 5 , 74 Waterways: Trabuco Creek, San Juan Creek Airports: None Railways: AmtraklMetrolink Schools: 3 schools within '!.-mile Document Type: CEQA: D NOP D Early Cons 0 Neg Dec 181 Mit Neg Dec Local Action Type: D General Plan Update D General Plan Amendment D General Plan Element D Community Plan Development Type: 0 DraftEIR 0 Supplement/Subsequent BIR (Prior SCH No.) _____ _ Other: D Specific Plan D Master Plan D Planne.d Unit Development 181 Sile Plan 0 Residential: Units __ _ Acres __ _ NEPA : 0 NOI Other: 0 EA D DraftEIS 0 FONS! 0 Rezone 0 ?rezone 0 UscPcnnit 0 Land Division (Subdivision, etc.) 0 Joint Document 0 Final Document 0 Other: ------- 0 Annexation 0 Redevelopment 0 Coastal Pennit !&I Other Road "1mprovemenl 0 Office: S411.fl. __ _ Acres Employees __ _ [BJ Transportation: Type Slreet Beauliflcallon 0 Commercial: Sq.ft. 0 Industrial: Sq.ft. --- 0 Educational: --- Acres 0 Mining: Mineral ____________ _ 0 Power: Type MW Employees __ _ Acres 0 Recreational:------------------ D Waste Trcatment:Type MGD,,,.------ Employees __ _ 0 Water Facilitics:Typc ------ 0 Hazardous Waste:Typc 181 Other: Slreel lmprovem.,...en-::t'("'30"'0'l""'lre,,..,...,.a:-:I f,.,.e"'et:-:.J-------MGD ----- Project Issues Discussed In Document: 0 Aesthetic/Visual D Fiscal 0 Recreation/Parks 0 Agricultural Land 0 Flood Plain/Flooding 0 Schools/Universities 0 Air Quality D Forest umd/Fire Hazard 0 Septic Systems 181 Archeological/Historical lg] Geologic/Seismic 0 Sewer Capacity ~ Biological Resources 0 Minerals 0 Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grading D Coastal Zone 0 Noise D Solid Waste D Drainage( Absorption D Population/Housing Balance D Toxic/Hazardous D Economic/Jobs 0 Public Services/Facilities !BJ Traffic/Circulation Present Land Use/Zoning/General Plan Designation: General Plan Designation: Public Street D Vegetation 0 Water Quality 0 Water Supply/Groundwater 0 Wetland/Riparian D Growth Inducement 0 Land Use 0 Cumulative Effects 181 Other:. Tribal Cultural ----------------------------------------------Project Description: (please use a separate page if necessary) The City of San Juan Capistrano has proposed the Verdugo Street Beautification Project in San Juan Capistrano to beautify the corridor and provide a more pedestrian-friendly street experience for visitors. The project proposes enhanced paving, walkways, landscaping, signage and utilities on Verdugo Street between Camino Capistrano and the Metrolink Station at the entry to the Historic Los Rios District in downtown San Juan Capistrano. Nore: The State Cleari11ghouse will a.rsig11ident(fjr:atio1111umbersfor all 11ew projects. If a SCH numberalre•dy exists fora project (e.g. No/ice of Preparation or pre~ious draft document) please jilt in. Revised 2010 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 34 of 293 Reviewing Agencies Checklist Lead Agencies may recommend State Clearinghouse distribution by marking agencies below with and "X". If you have already sent your document to the agency please denote that with an "S". Air Resources Board Boating & Waterways, Department of California Emergency Management Agency California Highway Patrol Caltrans District # Caltrans Division of Aeronautics Caltrans Planning Central Valley Flood Protection Board __ Coachella Valley Mtns. Conservancy Coastal Commission Colorado River Board Conservation, Department of Corrections, Department of Delta Protection Commission Education, Department of Energy Commission Fish & Game Region# __ Food & Agriculture, Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Department of General Services, Department of Health Services, Department of Housing & Community Development Native American Heritage Commission Local Public Review Period (to be tllled In by lead agency) Starting Date r/p.3// 1 _____ r_ z ______ _ Lead Agenc.y (Complete If applicable): Co nsulting Firm : ECORP Consultlng Address: 1801 Park Court Place , 81.dg . B Suite 103 City/State/Zip: Santa Ana, CA 92701 Contact: Tom. Holm Phone: (714) 648-0630 Office of Historic Preservation Office of Public School Construction __ Parks & Recreation, Department of __ Pesticide Regulation, Department of Public Utilities Commission __ Regional WQCB # __ __ Resources Agency __ Resources Recycling and Recovery, Department of __ S.F. Bay Conservation & Development Comm. __ San Gabriel & Lower L.A. Rivers & Mtns. Conservancy __ San Joaquin River Conservancy Santa Monica Mtns. Conservancy State Lands Commission SWRCB: Clean Water Grants __ SWRCB: Water Quality __ SWRCB: Water Rights __ Tahoe Regional Plann1ng Agency Toxic Substances Control, Department of __ Water Resources, Department of Other: --------------~--~ Other: _________ ...,.... ______ _ Ending Date _,_f_l_l_0_1_7 ________ _ Applicant: City of San Juan Capistrano Address: 32400 Paseo Adelanto Cit y/Sta te/Zip : San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Phone: (949) 493 -1171 ;.: .. :~;~,;~.:.~.:.~:~.; .. ~ 1~~~ -----------":.~if ;"/ii Authority cited: Section 21083, Public Resources Code. Reference: Section 21161, Public Resources Code. Revised 20 l 0 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 35 of 293 NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT AN INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE VERDUGO STREET BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT The City of San Juan Capistrano (City) is the Lead Agency and project proponent for the proposed Verdugo Street Beautification Project (Proposed Project). The City has directed the preparation of an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The purpose of an IS/MND is to provide decision makers, public agencies, and the general public with an objective and informative document that facilitates a basic understanding of the Proposed Project and fully discloses the potential environmental effects associated with the Proposed Project, including direct, indirect, and cumulative environmental effects. The Proposed Project will require the following agency permits and approvals: City Council approval of Capital Improvement Project (CIP) 14106. Project Location: The Proposed Project is located in the City of San Juan Capistrano near the San Juan Capistrano Metrolink/Amtrak train depot and includes the entire length (approximately 300 linear feet) of Verdugo Street from the intersection at Camino Capistrano to the cul-de-sac. Project Description: The Proposed Project would beautify the corridor and provide a more pedestrian-friendly street experience for visitors. The proposed improvements will include the following: • Reducing the overall width of the roadway; • Widening the sidewalks and adding rolled curbs; • Adding bulb-outs at intersection with Camino Capistrano; • Providing colored concrete and decorative pavers; • Modifications to existing storm drain catch basins; • Landscaping and irrigation; • Enhanced lighting and seating; and • Installing ADA ramps and improvements. Phasing of Project improvements will be coordinated to minimize construction impacts to the adjacent businesses and to maintain traffic flow and avoid to the extent practical conflicts with holidays and special events in the downtown area. Potentially Significant Environmental Impacts: Potentially significant impacts to biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, and tribal cultural resources were identified in the Initial Study. All impacts would be reduced to a less- than-significant level with the incorporation of mitigation measures. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 36 of 293 Public Review Period: In compliance with CEQA, the City has established a 20-day local public review period beginning Thursday, May 23, 2019, to solicit comments and input on the Draft IS/MND. To ensure all environmental issues are fully identified and adequately addressed, written comments are invited from all interested parties. Written comments on the Draft 15/MND should be submitted no later than 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 11, 2019, to: Joe Parco, City Engineer City of San Juan Capistrano 32400 Paseo Adelanto San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Email: jparco@sanjuancapistrano.org Written comments regarding the scope and content of information in the Draft IS/MND may also be submitted electronically no later than Tuesday, June 11, 2019, to the City Engineer. A copy of the Draft IS/MND is available for public review at the following locations: San Juan Capistrano Library 31495 El Camino Real San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 City of San Juan Capistrano Community Services Department 25925 Camino del Avion San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 City of San Juan Capistrano City Hall Development Services Department 32400 Paseo Adelanto San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 The Draft IS/MND is available for public review online at the following website: http://sanjuancapistrano.org/Departments/Development-Services/Planning- Zoning/Environmental-Documents ATTACHMENT 2, Page 37 of 293 DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION VERDUGO STREET BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO ECORP Consulting, Inc. E 'V IB 'M ;NTA I C' N5l'l.TA 'T S May 2019 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 38 of 293 This page intentionally left blank ATTACHMENT 2, Page 39 of 293 DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION VERDUGO STREET BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO Submitted to: City of San Juan Capistrano Development Services Department 32400 Paseo Adelanto San Juan Capistrano, California 92675 Prepared by: ECORP CONSULTING, INC. 1801 East Park Court Place, Bldg. B Santa Ana, California 92701 (714) 648-0630 ECORP Project No. 2018-246 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 40 of 293 This page intentionally left blank ATTACHMENT 2, Page 41of293 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 3 1.1 PURPOSE ofTHIS INITIAL STUDY 3 1.2 SUMMARY of FINDINGS 3 1.3 ORGANIZATION of THE INITIAL STUDY 3 1.4 CONTACT PERSON 4 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION s 2.1 PROJECT SITE AND SITE DESCRIPTION 5 2.2 PROPOSED PROJECT 5 2.3 LEAD AGENCY PERMITS AND APPROVALS 6 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED 11 4.0 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 13 4.1 AESTHETICS 14 4.2 AGRICULTURE & FOREST RESOURCES 16 4.3 AIR QUALITY 18 4.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 22 4.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES 25 4.6 ENERGY 29 4.7 GEOLOGY AND SOILS 30 4.8 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS 34 4.9 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 36 4.10 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY 41 4.11 LAND USE/PLANNING 44 4.12 MINERAL RESOURCES 45 4.13 NOISE 46 4.14 POPULATION AND HOUSING 48 4.15 PUBLIC SERVICES 49 4.16 RECREATION 51 4.17 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC 52 4.18 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES 56 4.19 UTILITIES/SERVICE SYSTEMS 59 4.20 WILDFIRE 61 4.21 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE 62 5.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 63 5.1 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 63 5.2 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROCEDURES 64 6.0 REFERENCES 71 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 42 of 293 FIGURES AND TABLES FIGURES Figure 1: Project Location ................................................................................................................... 7 Figure 2A: Site Photo ........................................................................................................................... 8 Figure 28 : Site Photo ........................................................................................................................... 9 Figure 3: Refined Concept Plan ........................................................................................................... 10 Figure 4: Study Locations .................................................................................................................... 56 TABLES Table 4.3-1: Construction-Related Emissions (Regional Significance Analysis) .................................. 21 Table 4.3-2: Construction-Related Emissions (Localized Significance Analysis) ................................. 21 Table 4.8-1: Construction-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions-Metric Tons/Year ............................ 36 Table 5.2-1: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program .............................................................. 66 APPENDICES A: Cumulative Projects List B: Project Concept Plan C: Cultural Records Search Result D: Geotechnical Exploration and Design Study E: Traffic Impact Analysis F: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions ATTACHMENT 2, Page 43 of 293 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose of this Initial Study In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines, this Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) has been prepared for the Verdugo Street Beautification Project (hereafter referred to as the "Project") in San Juan Capistrano, California. This IS/MND has been prepared pursuant to CEQA, as amended (Public Resources Code [PRC] §21000 et seq.) and in accordance with the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations [CCR] §15000 et seq.). Consistent with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15071, this IS/MND includes a description of the Project, an evaluation ofthe potential environmental impacts associated with implementation of the Project, and findings from the environmental analysis. Pursuant to Section 15367 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City of San Juan Capistrano (City) is the Lead Agency for the Project. The Lead Agency is the public agency with the principal responsibility for carrying out or approving a project that may have a significant effect on the environment. The City, as the Lead Agency, has the authority for project approval and adoption or certification of the accompanying environmental documentation. 1.2 Summary of Findings Based on the Environmental Checklist Form prepared for the project (Section 4.0) and supporting environmental analysis (Section 5.0), the proposed Project would have no impact or less than significant impacts in the following environmental areas : aesthetics, agriculture and forest land resources, air quality, energy, greenhouse gases, hydrology and water quality, land use, mineral resources, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, traffic, and utilities and services. The proposed Project has the potential to have significant impacts on the following topics unless the recommended mitigation measures described herein are incorporated into the proposed Project: biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, and tribal cultural resources. According to the State CEQA Guidelines, it is appropriate to prepare a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the proposed Project because, after incorporation of the recommended mitigation measures, potentially significant environmental impacts would be eliminated or reduced to a level considered less than significant. 1.3 Organization of the Initial Study • Section 1.0: Introduction. This section provides an introduction and overview of the findings in the IS/MND • Section 2.0: Environmental Setting and Project Description. This section provides a description of the proposed Project including project location, relevant background information, and a description ofthe existing conditions of the project site and vicinity. This section also provides a description of necessary discretionary approvals. • Section 3.0: Environmental Factors Potentially Affected. This section provides a list of the environmental factors that would be potentially affected by the proposed Project and a determination ATTACHMENT 2, Page 44 of 293 by the City as to the appropriate environmental document. • Section 4.0: Environmental Checklist and Discussion of Environmental Checklist Questions. This section provides an analysis of environmental impacts identified through the environmental checklist process and identifies recommended mitigation measures to mitigate any potentially significant effects or to reduce them to a level considered less than significant. • Section 5.0: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. This section contains the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) prepared for the proposed Project, consistent with the requirements of PRC Section 21081.6. The program describes the requirements and procedures to be followed by the _City to ensure that all mitigation measures adopted as part of the proposed Project are implemented as described in this IS/MND. • Section 6.0: References. This section contains the references used to prepare the IS/MND. 1.4 Contact Person Any questions or comments regarding the preparation of this IS/MND, its assumptions or its conclusions should be referred to the following: Joe Parco, City Engineer City of San Juan Capistrano 32400 Paseo Adelanto San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Tel: (949) 443-6353 Email: jparco@sanjuancapistrano.org ATTACHMENT 2, Page 45 of 293 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETIING AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Project Site and Site Description The project site is located in the city of San Juan Capistrano near the San Juan Capistrano Metrolink/Amtrak train depot and includes the entire length (approximately 300 lineal feet) of Verdugo Street from the intersection at Camino Capistrano to the cul-de-sac. The site is east ofthe historic Los Rios district and is within the City's Historic Town Center. The existing paved street has commercial businesses and concrete sidewalks on both sides and the street terminates at the train depot and a parking structure. There are existing utilities within the street and sidewalk that include domestic water, gas, sewer, storm drain, electrical services, AT&T and Cox Communications, and traffic control devices. The existing streetscape includes mostly concrete and paver sidewalks with sparse trees and plants. The Project location is shown on Figure 1. Views of Verdugo Street are shown in Figure 2. 2.2 Proposed Project The Verdugo Street Beautification Project ('Project') is intended to beautify the corridor and provide a more pedestrian-friendly street experience for visitors. The proposed improvements will include the following: • Reducing the overall width ofthe roadway; • Widening the sidewalks and adding rolled curbs; • Adding bulb-outs at intersection with Camino Capistrano; • Providing colored concrete and decorative pavers; • Modifications to existing storm drain catch basins; • Landscaping and irrigation; • Enhanced lighting and seating; and • Installing ADA ramps and improvements. A key theme in the design of the Verdugo Street Beautification Project is to provide an inviting street corridor that will create a sense of arrival for visitors arriving by train, as well as those parking and walking to restaurants, the movie theatre and shops downtown. The design minimizes the use of standard curbs, and the roadways would be defined primarily by planter pots and bollards. The reduced street widths and widened sidewalks, provide a more pedestrian-focused experience with options for sidewalk dining and possibly temporary street closures for special events. Paving in the street and sidewalks would be enhanced utilizing colored or washed concrete, pavers, or a combination of both. Wood benches would provide seating while street trees would provide natural shade. Additional improvements will include planters with landscaping and enhanced (bistro) lights. A refined concept plan is shown in Figure 3. New ADA improvements will join the existing sidewalks at all Project intersections, principally Camino Capistrano and Verdugo Street. The cul-de-sac at this location is reduced from an existing 30' radius to a 25' radius. With the reduction in the cul-de-sac, a new catch basin is proposed to replace the existing catch basin, thus ensuring the new curb and gutter alignment drains properly. Street improvements will ensure proper drainage design for new curb and gutter, and sidewalk within the entire Project limits. Project improvements will be coordinated with all existing utilities within the Project limits. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 46 of 293 Phasing of Project improvements will be coordinated to minimize construction impacts to the adjacent businesses and to maintain traffic flow and avoid to the extent practical conflicts with holidays and special events in the downtown area. Implementation of street improvements is expected to occur in summer/fall of 2019. 2.3 Lead Agency Permits and Approvals The City of San Juan Capistrano is the Lead Agency and project proponent. The proposed Project will require the following agency permits and approvals: City Council approval of Capital Improvement (CIP) 14106. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 47 of 293 Map Date: 3/4/2019 Photo Source: NAIP 2016 Figure 1. Project Location 2018-246 Verdugo Street Beautification Project ATTACHMENT 2, Page 48 of 293 Photo 1. View from Verdugo Street/Camino Capistrano Intersection Photo 3. Franciscan Plaza and Parking Structure at cul-de-sac Photo 2. Regency Theater at Franciscan Plaza (south side of Verdugo Street Photo 4. View towards Amtrak/Metrolink Rail Line and Los Rios Street Figure 2A. Representative Site Photographs Am~ ~l'ff°i.'~ag~e~~ti8f"l§~ Project Photo 5. View towards Sarducci's and the Capistrano Depot Photo 7. Driveway at Verdugo Street (north side) Photo 6. Rancho Capistrano Winery (north site of Verdugo Street) Photo 8. Building Facade (Shops/Galleries on north side) Figure 28. Representative Site Photographs Amt1!i~M°i.'~ag~es~ti8f~~~ Project VERDUGO STREET CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO FEBRUARY 07, 2019 REFINED CONCEPT Figure 3. Refined Concept Plan 2018-246 Verdugo Street Beautification Project ATTACHMENT 2, Page 51 of293 This page intentionally left blank ATTACHMENT 2, Page 52 of 293 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" without the incorporation of mitigation. As indicated by the checklist on the following pages, all project-related potentially significant impacts would be reduced to a level below significance with the incorporation of mitigation measures and adherence to applicable standard conditions. 0 Aesthetics 0 Hazards/Hazardous Materials 0 Agriculture and Forestry Resources 0 Hydrology/Water Quality 0 Air Quality 0 Land Use and Planning ~ Biological Resources 0 Mineral Resources ~ Cultural Resources 0 Noise 0 Energy 0 Paleontological Resources ~ Geology and Soils 0 Population and Housing 0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 0 Public Services DETERMINATION. On the basis ofthis initial evaluation : 0 Recreation 0 Transportation ~ Tribal Cultural Resources 0 Utilities and Service Systems 0 Wildfire 0 Mandatory Findings of Significance I find that the Project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE O DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the Project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the Project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL O IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the Project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An 0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the Project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant 0 to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed u on the Project, nothing further is required. Serg i ~ DateJ:i, /s:Jj_t Environmental Administrator ATTACHMENT 2, Page 53 of 293 This page intentionally left blank ATTACHMENT 2, Page 54 of 293 4.0 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on- site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4. "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from earlier analyses may be cross-referenced, as discussed below). 5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration (Section 15063 (c)(3)(D)). In this case, a brief discussion should identity the following: a. Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b. Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c. Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less Than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated", describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used, or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 55 of 293 8. This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. Less Than 4.1 AESTHETICS Significant Potentially With Less Than Would the project: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact (a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? D D D IZl Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited (b) to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state D D D r8J scenic highway? In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and surroundings? (c) (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly D D D l8] accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? (d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would D D r8J D adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Impact Analysis: (a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? No Impact. A scenic vista is the view of an area that is visually or aesthetically pleasing from a certain vantage point. It is usually viewed from some distance away. Aesthetic components of a scenic vista include (1) scenic quality, (2) sensitivity level, and (3) view access. A scenic vista can be impacted in two ways: a development project can have visual impacts by either directly diminishing the scenic quality ofthe vista or by blocking the view corridors or "vista" of the scenic resource. Important factors in determining whether a proposed project would block scenic vistas include the project's proposed height, mass, and location relative to surrounding land uses and travel corridors. The project site is located in downtown San Juan Capistrano, on urban streets with adjacent one-and two-story commercial buildings, including restaurants, a theater, surface and structured parking. There are no locally designated scenic vistas in the Project vicinity and no significant distant views of the Santa Ana Mountains from within the Project limits. Construction. Construction of the proposed Project would require site preparation, grading, and construction activities. Construction activities would be briefly visible to travelers at the Camino Capistrano/Verdugo Street and Camino Capistrano/ Arguello Way intersections. Views of construction activities would be short-term in nature and would cease upon Project completion. The project site is not within a designated scenic corridor. Therefore, there would be no construction impacts related to adverse effects on a scenic vista. Operation. The project site is not within or adjacent a designated roadway scenic corridor in the Community Design Element of the City's General Plan. At its western terminus, ATTACHMENT 2, Page 56 of 293 Verdugo Street is near the SCCRA/Metrolink rail line, portions of which are a designated scenic corridor within the City limits. Potential Project improvements in this area include paver surfaces, wayfinding kiosks, and a trellis with seating. With implementation of the proposed Project, views of the urban street scene would be enhanced with additional landscape elements, bistro lighting and paving. The proposed Project would not result in impacts on views of the surrounding hills from Project roadways and sidewalks. The proposed Project would have no adverse effect on scenic vistas or views. (b) Would the project substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? No Impact. The project site is not a California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) designated or eligible State Scenic Highway. The portion of State Route 74 (SR-74) located approximately 1 mile north of the project site is identified as an Eligible State Scenic Highway but is not officially designated as a scenic highway by Caltrans.1 The Project proposes street beautification elements that would enhance the urban street scene. Therefore, the proposed Project does not have the potential to damage resources within a State-designated scenic highway, and no mitigation would be required. (c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? No Impact. The Project proposes beautification of a short roadway segment within the urbanized downtown area of the City. Construction activities will temporarily impact the urban visual character of the immediate project site and vicinity. However, following construction, the existing urban village character of the site will be enhanced with various landscape, paver, bistro lighting and wayfinding signage elements. The Project is not within a non-urbanized area and no Impact would occur. (d) Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Less than Significant Impact. Spill light occurs when lighting standards, such as streetlights, parking lot lighting, exterior building lighting, and landscape lighting, are not properly aimed or shielded to direct light to the desired location and light escapes and partially illuminates a surrounding location. The spillover of light onto adjacent properties has the potential to interfere with certain activities, including vision, sleep, privacy, and general enjoyment of the natural nighttime condition. Light-sensitive uses include residential, some commercial and institutional uses, and, in some situations, natural areas. Changes in nighttime lighting may become significant if a proposed project substantially increases ambient lighting conditions beyond its property line and project lighting routinely spills over into adjacent light-sensitive land uses areas. Construction. Short-term construction activities would occur primarily during daylight 1 California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). (2019). State Scenic Highway Mapping System . Available at: http://www.dot.ca .gov/hg/LandArch/16 llvabilitvlscenlc highways/. Accessed on March 1, 2019. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 57 of 293 4.2 hours; however, construction activities may require periodic nighttime lighting. Any construction-related illumination during evening or nighttime hours would be shielded to the extent feasible and would consist of the minimal lighting required for safety and security purposes and would only occur on a temporary and as-needed basis. Due to its limited scope and duration, light generated during project construction would not substantially alter the character of off-site areas surrounding the construction area or interfere with the performance of an off-site activity. Therefore, construction lighting impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. Operation. The Project proposes limited bistro-type lighting and sign illumination within Verdugo Street to complement pedestrian movement and wayfinding during evening hours. These fixtures will be low illumination and/or shielded to prevent any spillover effects on surrounding commercial uses and the Los Rios Historic District across the Metrolink rail line to the west. Project street improvements include no reflective light (glare) elements, surfaces or materials. No light and glare impact from Project operations would occur. Less Than AGRICULTURE & FOREST RESOURCES Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Would the project: Impact Incorporated Impact Impact (a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance as depicted on the maps prepared D D D pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? (b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson D D D Act contract? (c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of forest land (as defined in Public Resource Code section 12220(g)), D D D Timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4S26), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104 (g))? (d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? D D 0 (e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which due to their location or nature, could result in conversion to Farmland to D D D non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?? Impact Analysis: (a) Would the project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance as depicted on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency? l8I [81 [8J 18] (8] No Impact. The project site is an existing 315-foot long roadway segment within the developed downtown area of the City. The site is not used as farmland, nor mapped as farmland on the State's Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program. 2 No construction or operational impact on farmland would occur. (b) Would the project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson 2 California Department of Conservation (CDC). (2018). Orange County Important Farmland 2016 Map. Available at: https://www.conserval'ion.ca.gov/dlrp/fmmp/Pages/Orange.aspx . Accessed on March 4, 2019. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 58 of 293 Act contract? No Impact. The project site is depicted as a roadway within the City 's Town Center District. The project site is not located within an area covered under a Williamson Act contract. 3 Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with any Williamson Act contract . No impacts related to this issue would occur with implementation of the proposed project. (c) Would the project involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? No Impact. The Project proposes beautification measures on a local street within the urbanized Town Center of the City. There are no farmlands or agricultural uses in the vicinity of the Project. No changes in the existing environment that could lead to conversion of farmlands would occur. (d) Would the project result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non- forest use? No Impact. The Project site and vicinity are not forest land. No impact would occur. (e) Would the project Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? No Impact. The Project site and surrounding areas are neither farmland nor forest land. No impact would occur. 'California Department of Conservation (CDC). (2004). Agricultural Preserves 2004: Williamson Act Parcels. Orange County, California. Available at: https://www.co nse rvatlon.ca.gov/dlr p/wa/Pages/sta t s repo cts .as px . Accessed on March 4, 2019 . ATTACHMENT 2, Page 59 of 293 Less Than 4.3 AIR QUALITY Significant Potentially With Less Than Sign ificant Mitigation Significant Would the project: Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact (a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable 0 0 ~ 0 air quality plan? (b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any 0 0 ~ 0 criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? (c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant 0 0 ~ 0 concentrations? (d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) 0 0 ~ 0 adversely affecting a substantial number of people? Impact Analysis: (a) Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Less Than Significant Impact. The project site is located in the City of San Juan Capistrano, within the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB), which includes all of Orange County (County) and portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties. Air quality within the SCAB is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). SCAQMD and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) are responsible for formulating and implementing the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) for SCAB. The latest plan is the 2016 AQMP, which incorporates the latest scientific and technological information and planning assumptions, including the 2016 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) and updated em ission inventory methodologies for various source categories . The main purpose of an AQMP is to describe air pollution control strategies to be taken by a city, county, or region classified as a nonattainment area in order to bring the area into compliance with federal and State air quality standards. A nonattainment area is considered to have air quality worse than the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) as defined in the federal Clean Air Act. The SCAB is in nonattainment for the federal and State standards for ozone (03) and particulate matter less than 2 .5 microns in diameter (PM2.s). In addition, the SCAB is in nonattainment for the State standard for particulate matter less than 10 microns in diameter (PM10). The SCAB is in attainment/maintenance for the federal PM10, carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (S02), lead, and nitrogen dioxide (N02) standards. Consistency with the 2016 AQMP would be achieved if a project is consistent with the goals, objectives, and assumptions in the respective plan to achieve the federal and State air quality standards . Per SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook (1993), there are two main indicators of a project's consistency with the applicable AQMP: (1) whether the project would increase the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations, cause or contribute to new violations, or delay timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emission reductions specified in the applicable AQMP (2016 AQMP); and (2) ATTACHMENT 2, Page 60 of 293 whether the project would exceed the AQMP's assumptions for final year for the AQMP. The CEQA Air Quality Handbook indicates that consistency with AQMP growth assumptions must be analyzed for new or amended General Plan elements, Specific Plans, and significant projects. Significant projects include airports, electrical generating facilities, petroleum and gas refineries, designation of oil drilling districts, water ports, solid waste disposal sites, and offshore drilling facilities. For the proposed project to be consistent with the AQMP, the pollutants emitted from the project should not exceed the SCAQMD daily threshold or cause a significant impact on air quality. Additionally, if feasible mitigation measures are implemented and shown to reduce the impact level from significant to less than significant, a project may be deemed consistent with the AQMP. Because of the limited extent and duration of Project construction activities, it is anticipated that construction emissions would be below the emissions thresholds established in SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Analysis Handbook and would not be expected to result in significant air quality impacts. Additionally, as a local roadway beautification project that does not expand the roadway capacity, the proposed Project would not be considered as a "significant project" affecting air quality in the region. Therefore, the proposed Project would be consistent with and not conflict with or obstruct implementation ofthe 2016 AQMP. No mitigation is required. (b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? less Than Significant Impact. By its very nature, air pollution is largely a cumulative impact. No single project is sufficient in size, by itself, to result in nonattainment of ambient air quality standards. Instead, a project's individual emissions contribute to existing cumulatively significant adverse air quality impacts. If a project's individual emissions exceed its identified significance thresholds, the project would be cumulatively considerable. Projects that do not exceed significance thresholds would not be considered cumulative considerable. Short-Term (Construction) Regional Emissions. Short-Term (Construction) Emissions Construction associated with the proposed project would generate short-term emissions of air pollutants. Criteria air pollutants, such as course particulate matter (PM10), fine particulate matter (PM2 .s), carbon monoxide (CO), and sulfur dioxide (S02), as well as ozone precursors, such as reactive organic gas (ROG) and nitrogen oxide (NOx), would be emitted during construction activities. Construction-generated emissions are short term and of temporary duration, lasting only as long as construction activities occur, but would be considered a significant air quality impact if the volume of pollutants generated exceeds the SCAQMD's thresholds of significance. Construction results in the temporary generation of emissions resulting from demolition and hauling of existing hardscape, implementation of improvements, and paving. Predicted maximum daily construction-generated emissions for the proposed project are summarized in Table 4.3-1. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 61 of 293 T bl 4 3 1 C a e -onstruct1on-RI d E .. e ate m1ss1ons (R eg1ona 1s· T iQm 1cance A I . ) P na VSIS -d /D oun s av Construction Year ROG NOx co S02 PM10 PM2.s 2019 2.63 25 .48 20 .16 0.03 1.80 1.35 SCAQMD Potentially Significant 75 100 550 150 150 55 Impact Threshold Exceed Threshold? No No No No No No Source: CalEEMod version 2016. 3.2. Refer to Appendix B for Model Data Outputs. Notes: The reduction/credits for construction emissions are based on measures included in CalEEMod and as required by the SCAQMD through Rule 403. This includes the following : prop erly maintain mobile and other construction equipment; replace ground cover in disturbed areas quickly; water exposed surface s three times daily; cover sto ck pile s with tarps ; water all haul roads twice daily; and limit speeds on unpaved roads to 15 mile s per hour. Reductions percentages from the SCAQMD CEQA Handbook (Tables XI-A through Xl-E) were applied. As shown in Table 4.3-1, all criteria pollutant emissions would remain below their respective thresholds . Short-Term (Construction) Localized Emissions. In order to identify impacts to sensitive receptors, the SCAQMD recommends addressing Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs) for construction. LSTs apply to CO, N02, PM10, and PM2.s. The nearest sensitive receptors to the project site are residences located 575 feet (175 meters) from the Project site at the closest . LST thresholds are provided for distances to sensitive receptors of 25, 50, 100, 200, and 500 meters. Therefore, for a conservative analysis, LSTs for receptors located at 100 meters were utilized in this analysis. For the proposed project, the appropriate source receptor area (SRA) for the localized significance thresholds is the Capistrano Valley area (SRA 21) since this area includes the project site. The Proposed Project site is less than one acre. The SCAQMD has produced look-up tables for projects that disturb 1-acre, 2-acre, and 5-acre . Therefore, the LST threshold value for a 1-acre was used from the LST lookup tables. The SCAQMD's methodology clearly states that "off-site mobile emissions from a project should not be included in the emissions compared to LSTs." Therefore, for purposes of the construction LST analysis, only emissions included in the CalEEMod "on-site" emissions outputs were considered. Table 4.3-2 presents the results of localized emissions during construction activity. The LSTs reflect a 1-acre project site located 100 meters from the nearest sensitive receptors . Ta bl e 4.3-2. c onstruct1on-Re ate d r d . T I . ) p Em1ss1ons (Loca 1ze S1gm 1cance Analysis -oun d /D s ay Activity NOx co PM10 PM2.s Demolition 8.60 7.69 0.54 0.51 Site Preparation 8.91 4.14 0.57 0.36 Paving 7.84 7.14 0.4 0.4 1 SCAQMD Localized Screening Threshold 108 1,234 24 8 (Adjusted for 1 acre of disturbance at 100 meters) Exceed Threshold? No No No No Source: CalEEMod version 2016.3.2. Refer to Appendix B for Model Data Outputs . Notes : The reduction/credits for construction emissions are based on measures included in CalEE Mod and as required by the SCAQMD through Rule 403. This includes the following: properly maintain mobile and other construction equipment; replace gro und cover in disturbed areas quickly; water exposed surfaces three times daily; cover stock piles wi th tarps; water all haul roads twice daily; and limit speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour. Reductions percentages from the SCAQMD CEQA Handb ook (Tables XI-A through Xl -E) were applied. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 62 of 293 Table 4.3-2 shows that the emissions of these pollutants on the peak day of construction would not result in significant concentrations of pollutants at nearby sensitive receptors. Long-Term (Operational) Emissions. Long-term air emission impacts are those associated with any change in permanent use of the project site by on-site stationary and off-site mobile sources that substantially increase emissions. The project proposes Verdugo Street beautification improvements within and adjacent the road right-of-way with no expansion of roadway vehicular capacity. The Project would not change the permanent use of the project site by any on-site stationary or off- site mobile sources. No long-term (operational) emissions impacts would occur and no long-term operational localized impacts would occur. (c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Less Than Significant Impact. Construction activities would involve the use of a variety of gasoline-or diesel-powered equipment that emits exhaust fumes and generates dust during soil disturbance. These temporary air quality impacts could negatively affect sensitive receptors in the project area, which is considered a potentially significant impact. As previously described, SCAQMD staff has developed the LST methodology that can be used by public agencies to determine whether or not a project may generate significant adverse localized air quality impacts during construction. As shown under Section 4.3 (b), all LSTs would remain below their respective thresholds; therefore, project construction activities would not significantly impact sensitive receptors. As Previously described, the Project does not include any on-site stationary or off-site mobile sources. No long-term (operational) emissions impacts would occur and no long- term operational localized impacts would occur. Sensitive receptors would not be exposed to substantial pollutant concentrations. This is a less than significant impact. (d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? Less Than Significant Impact. SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Analysis Handbook identifies various secondary significance criteria related to odorous air contaminants. Substantial odor-generating sources include land uses such as agricultural activities, feedlots, wastewater treatment facilities, landfills, or heavy manufacturing uses. The Project does not propose any such uses or activities that would result in potentially significant odor impacts. Some objectionable odors may emanate from the operation of diesel-powered construction equipment during construction of the proposed Project. However, these odors would be limited to the construction period and would disperse quickly; therefore, these odors would not be considered a significant impact. No significant impacts related to objectionable odors would result from the proposed project, and no mitigation is required. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 63 of 293 Less Than 4.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Would the project: Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, (a) sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish D l2l D D and Wildlife or U.S . Fish and Wildlife Service? Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or (b) regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife D D D ~ Service? Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, (c) vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or D D D 181 other means? Interfere substantially with the movement of any native (d) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or D D D l2l impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting (e) biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or D D D l'8l ordinance? Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat (f) Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation D D D 181 plan? Impact Analysis: (a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Less Than Significant with Mitigation. The approximately .71-acre project site is an existing roadway located within an urban area of the City of San Juan Capistrano. The project site is currently characterized by pavement and limited ornamental landscape in the form of several street trees (Liquidambar styracifula) in tree pockets and low shrubs in narrow planters' adjacent commercial establishments. Two mature palm trees are located at the west end plaza area adjacent the parking structure. The landscape Concept Plan calls for removal and replacement of several small trees along Verdugo Street with London plane trees (8) trees, Crape myrtle trees (3) and planter pots, with the palm trees to be preserved in place. There are no known sensitive species or habitats on site (including special-status raptors) as identified on local/regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) or the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). ATTACHMENT 2, Page 64 of 293 Construction. Construction of the proposed Project may include removal and replacement of several trees. Although the removal of on-site non-native trees is not considered a significant unavoidable impact, bird species could potentially use the non- native ornamental trees on the project site during the likely active breeding season (February 15-August 15) for this species. As such, the Project would be required to implement Mitigation Measure BI0-1, which requires preconstruction clearance surveys for active bird nesting and restrictions for tree removals in compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). Therefore, compliance with Mitigation Measure BI0-1 would reduce potential construction impacts to on-site nesting birds to a less than significant level. Operation. Implementation of the proposed Project would result in an increase in on-site ornamental vegetation, trees and shrubs that could potentially support limited levels of wildlife, as compared with existing conditions. Therefore, implementation and operation of the proposed project would potentially provide additional limited habitat for bird species, and no adverse impacts to candidate, sensitive, or special-status species would occur. No mitigation would be required. In summary, the proposed project would not result in impacts to or adversely affect natural habitats, natural plant communities, special-status plant or animal species, or drainages subject to the jurisdiction of the United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), the CDFW, or the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). In addition, the proposed project would not significantly affect wildlife movement, nor would it eliminate or otherwise adversely ·impact any wildlife movement corridor. Therefore, the proposed project would not cumulatively contribute to the biological resource impacts, when considered with other projects in the project vicinity, and no mitigation would be required. Mitigation Measures: 810-1 Migratory Bird Treaty Act. In the event that construction activities occur during the breeding season (February 15-August 15), the Applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a nesting bird survey within 5 days prior to commencement of construction activities. The nesting bird survey shall identify and document active nesting within 100 feet of the construction limits. If nesting birds are discovered during preconstruction surveys, the biologists shall identify an appropriate buffer (i.e., up to 500 feet depending on the circumstances and specific bird species) where no construction activities or other disturbances are allowed to occur until after the birds have fledged from the nest. Prior to commencement of grading activities and issuance of any building permits, the City of San Juan Capistrano Director of Development Services, or designee, shall verify that all project grading and construction plans include specific documentation regarding the requirements of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act {MBTA), that preconstruction surveys have been completed and the results reviewed by staff, and that the appropriate buffers (if needed) are noted on the plans and established in the field with orange snow fencing. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 65 of 293 (b) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? No Impact. The project site is an existing roadway located within an urban area of the City of San Juan Capistrano . There are no riparian habitats or other sensitive natural communities in the vicinity of the project site. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not impact any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the CDFW or USFWS. No mitigation would be required. (c) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? No Impact. The project site is located within a highly urbanized area of the City and lacks any natural streams or riparian habitat. The project site does not contain any federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Therefore, development of the project site would have no impact on federally protected wetlands, and no mitigation would be required. (d) Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? No Impact. The project site is an existing roadway within an urbanized area of the City . Within the vicinity of the project site, there are no large areas of natural habitat that would facilitate wildlife movement. The site is not near any wildlife corridor or native wildlife nursery site. No impact on movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species would occur. (e) Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? No Impact. The project site contains several existing street trees along the south side of Verdugo Street near the intersection with Camino Capistrano. These trees will be removed during construction and Project implementation and replaced with a greater number of trees than the current condition. The City will specify the type of replacement trees and landscaping. As a beautification project for an existing public roadway, the Project does require approval of a tree removal permit, as specified in the City's Municipal Code (Section 9-2.349(c)(S), Tree Removal Permit for city facilities and right- of-way. The proposed Project would not result in adverse impacts related to local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources during construction, and no impact would occur. (f) Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP), Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP), or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? No Impact. The project site is an existing roadway within the urbanized Town Center of ATTACHMENT 2, Page 66 of 293 San Juan Capistrano. The project site located in an area identified as "developed" and outside of the designated habitat reserve as identified in the Orange County HCP/NCCP. As such, development of the proposed Project would not result in the removal of any sensitive habitat species identified in the Orange County NCCP/HCP. Therefore, the proposed Project would result in no impact related to potential conflicts with the goals and policies outlined in the Orange County HCP/NCCP. Less Than 4.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Would the project: Impact Incorporated Impact Impact (a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a D D D !81 historical resource pursuant to §15064.5? (b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an D [81 D D archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? (c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of D [81 D D dedicated cemeteries? Impact Analysis: (a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to §15064.5? No Impact. On January 31, 2019, a record search to identify previously recorded prehistoric and historic cultural resources within one-eight-mile (0.125)-mile of the project area was conducted at the South-Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) of the California Historical Resources Information System at California State University, Fullerton. The SCCIC houses the pertinent archaeological and historic site and survey information necessary to determine whether cultural resources are known to exist within the project area. The records search included a review of all recorded historic and prehistoric archaeological sites within the one-eight-mile (0.125)-mile radius of the project site, as well as a review of known cultural resource survey and excavation reports. The National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register), California Historical Landmarks, and the California Points of Historical Interest were also examined. The records search showed that a total of 20 cultural resources investigations have been conducted within the one-eight-mile records search radius. The records search results show that 54 cultural resources have been previously recorded within the one-eight-mile records search radius, including 14 archeological sites, 9 isolated artifacts, and 30 buildings and structures. None of these previously recorded resources on file at the SCCIC are in or adjacent to the project site. The records search also noted 86 buildings, structures, and streets in San Juan Capistrano as part of the California Historic Property Data File (HPDF). Of these 86 features, the Combs House listed at 26720 Verdugo Road along the southside of Verdugo Street, where the present Regency Theatre is now located, is the only feature within the project site. However, the Combs House was likely demolished in order to build the theatre. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in any impacts related to historical resources, and no mitigation would be required. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 67 of 293 (b) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. As described further in Section 4.5 (a), a records search to identify previously recorded prehistoric and historic cultural resources and cultural resource surveys within one-eight-mile (0.125) ofthe project area were conducted at the SCCIC of the California Historical Resources Information System at California State University, Fullerton. The records search showed that 20 cultural resources investigations have been conducted within one-eight-mile (0.125) of the project area. The records search revealed that no previously recorded resources on file at the SCICC are in or adjacent to the project site. Although no cultural resources were identified by the record search or pedestrian survey, the Cultural Resources Assessment concluded that due to the project site's location within the City (approximately 0.5 mile north of the San Juan Creek, approximately .05 mile from Mission San Juan Capistrano, and 2.9 miles from the coast in an area near recorded prehistoric and historic resources) there is potential for subsurface archaeological deposits below the ground surface. Consequently, Mitigation Measure CUL-1 requires that an archaeological monitor be on site during ground-disturbing activities to monitor for buried prehistoric or historic material. Mitigation Measure CUL- 2 includes procedures for recovering any significant or unique archaeological resources and for preparation of a report that documents the monitoring and any recovery at the project site. Implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL-1 and CUL-2 would reduce any potential impacts to previously undiscovered archaeological resources to a less than significant level. At the completion of project construction, the proposed Project would not result in further disturbance of native soils on the project site. Therefore, operation of the proposed Project would not result in a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource as defined in Section 15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Mitigation Measures: CUL-1: Archaeological Monitor. Prior to issuance of grading permits, and in adherence to the recommendations of the cultural resources records search, the City shall retain a qualified archaeological monitor. Monitoring by a qualified archaeologist should be conducted under the supervision of an Orange County Certified archaeologist and by a Native American monitor from one ofthe Juafieno groups recognized by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). Monitoring will be conducted in accordance with the City of San Juan Capistrano's Council Policy 601 on historic, archaeological, and paleontological resource management.4 The monitor shall be present on the project site during ground-disturbing activities to monitor rough and finish grading, excavation, and other ground-disturbing activities in the native soils. Because no cultural resources were identified on the project site, archaeological monitors are not required to be present on a full-time basis 4 City of San Juan Capistrano. (2017). Council Policy 601. Available at: http:/jsanluancaplstrano.org/Portals/0/Counci1Pollcy601 1.pdf. Accessed on March 4, 2019. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 68 of 293 CUL-2: but shall spot check ground-disturbing activities to ensure that no cultural resources are impacted during construction activities. The exact timing of monitoring activities shall be consistent with the provisions established in the Monitoring Plan, which is required as part of Mitigation Measure CUL-2. Archaeological Monitoring Plan and Accidental Discovery. Prior to commencement of any grading activities on site, the Applicant shall retain a qualified archaeologist to prepare a Monitoring Plan . The Monitoring Plan shall be prepared by a qualified archaeologist and shall be reviewed by the City Development Services Director, or designee. The Monitoring Plan should include at a minimum: (1) a list of personnel involved in the monitoring activities; (2) a description of how the monitoring shall occur; (3) a description of the frequency of monitoring (e .g., full-time, part-time, spot checking); (4) a description of what resources may be encountered; (5) a description of circumstances that would result in the halting of work at the project site (e.g., what is considered a "significant" archaeological site); (6) a description of procedures for halting work on site and notification procedures; and (7) a description of monitoring reporting procedures. If any significant historical resources, archaeological resources, or human remains are found during monitoring, work shall be stopped within the immediate vicinity (precise area to be determined by the archaeologist in the field) of the resource until such time as the resource can be evaluated by an archaeologist and any other appropriate individuals. Project personnel shall not collect or move any archaeological materials or human remains and associated materials. To the extent feasible, project activities shall avoid these deposits. Where avoidance is not feasible, the archaeological deposits shall be evaluated for their eligibility for listing on the California Register of Historic Places. If the deposits are not eligible, avoidance is not necessary. If the deposits are eligible, adverse effects on the deposits must be avoided, or such effects must be mitigated. Mitigation can include, but is not necessarily limited to: leaving the deposits in place, excavation of the deposit in accordance with a data recovery plan (see California Code of Regulations [CCR] Title 4(3) Section 5126.4(b)(3)(C)) and standard archaeological field methods and procedures; laboratory and technical analyses of recovered archaeological materials; production of a report detailing the methods, findings, and significance ofthe archaeological site and associated materials; curation of archaeological materials at an appropriate facility for future research and/or display; an interpretive display of recovered archaeological materials at a local school, museum, or library; and public lectures at local schools and/or historical societies on the findings and significance ofthe site and recovered archaeological materials. It shall be the responsibility of the City Building Official, or designee, to verify that the Monitoring Plan is implemented during project excavation and grading. Upon completion of all monitoring/mitigation activities, the consulting archaeologist shall submit a monitoring report to the City Development Services Director, or designee, and to the South-Central Coastal Information Center summarizing all monitoring/mitigation activities and confirming that all recommended mitigation measures have been met. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 69 of 293 The monitoring report shall be prepared consistent with the guidelines of the Office of Historic Preservation's Archaeological Resources Management Reports (ARMR): Recommended Contents and Format. The City Development Services Director, or designee, shall be responsible for reviewing any reports produced by the archaeologist to determine the appropriateness and adequacy of the findings and recommendations. (c) Would the project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. No formal cemeteries are located in or nearthe project area and no human remains have been reported in the project vicinity, based on the records search from the SCICC. Therefore, due to the nature of the proposed Project as a street beautification project, the existing developed stated of the project site, and the depth of excavation the proposed Project has minimal potential to disturb human remains. However, there remains the potential for the discovery of buried and undiscovered archaeological remains, including human remains, below ground surface in portions of the project site. Disturbing human remains could violate the State's Health and Safety Code, as well as destroy the resource. As such, precautionary mitigation is required to ensure that the proposed Project does not impact or disturb any human remains. Mitigation Measure CUL-4 requires that the proper authorities would be notified and that standard procedures for the respectful handling of human remains during the earthmoving activities would be adhered to in the unlikely event that human remains are encountered during project excavation and/or grading. Construction contractors are required to adhere to California Code of Regulations (CCR) Section 15064.5(e), Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 5097, and Section 7050.5 of the State's Health and Safety Code. To ensure proper treatment of burials, in the event of an unanticipated discovery of a burial, human bone, or suspected human bone, the law requires that all excavation or grading in the vicinity of the find halt immediately, the area of the find be protected, and the contractor immediately notify the County Coroner of the find. The contractor, the Applicant, and the County Coroner are required to comply with the provisions of CCR Section 15064.S(e), PRC Section 5097.98, and Section 7050.5 of the State's Health and Safety Code . Compliance with Mitigation Measure CUL-3 would ensure that any potential impacts to unknown buried human remains would be less than significant by ensuring appropriate examination, treatment, and protection of human remains as required by State law. Mitigation Measure: CUL-3: Human Remains. Consistent with the requirements of CCR Section 15064.5(e), if human remains are encountered during site disturbance, grading, or other construction activities on the project site, the construction contractor shall halt work within 25 feet of the discovery; all work shall be redirected and the Orange County (County) Coroner notified immediately. No further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. If the remains are determined to be Native American, the ATTACHMENT 2, Page 70 of 293 County Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). The MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD shall complete the inspection within 48 hours of notification by the NAHC. The MLD may recommend scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials . Consistent with CCR Section 15064.S(d), ifthe remains are determined to be Native American and an MLD is notified, the City shall consult with the MLD identified by the NAHC to develop an agreement for the treatment and disposition of the remains. U pan completion of the assessment, the consulting archaeologist shall prepare a report documenting the methods and results and provide recommendations regarding the treatment of the human remains and any associated cultural materials, as appropriate, and in coordination with the recommendations of the MLD. The report shall be submitted to the City Development Services Director, or designee, and the South-Central Coastal Information Center . The City Development Services Director, or designee, shall be responsible for reviewing any reports produced by the archaeologist to determine the appropriateness and adequacy of the findings and recommendations. 4.6 ENERGY Less Than Would the project: Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact (a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumpt.ion of energy D resources, during project construction or operation? D ~ D (b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable D D D IZI energy or energy efficiency? Impact Analysis: (a) Would the project result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? · Less Than Significant Impact. Construction equipment will utilize only those amounts of electricity and fuels necessary for demolition and installation of proposed improvements. Due to the limited scale of proposed improvements to Verdugo Street and time frame for construction, it is not anticipated that wasteful, inefficient or unnecessary consumption of resources would occur. Proposed street improvements will include energy efficient lighting fixtures. Energy impacts will be less than significant. (b) Would the project conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? No Impact. The Project proposed street improvements and no buildings or uses that would consume significant amounts of energy are proposed. Street improvements will ATTACHMENT 2, Page 71of293 include energy efficient lighting fixtures. The project has no potential to conflict with state or local plans for renewable energy or energy efficiency. Energy impacts will be less than significant. 4.7 GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Less Than Significant Would the project: Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No lmpoct Incorporated Impact Impact (a) Directly or indirectly cause substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial D D [8J D evidence of a known fault (refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42). ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? D IZI D D iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? D D [81 D iv) Landslides? D D D (81 (b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? D D (81 D (c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result D [81 D D in on-or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? (d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined by the California Building D (81 D Code (CBC); creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or prooertv? (e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic D D D (f) tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or 0 D site or unique geologicfeature? Impact Analysis: (a) Would the project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: 181 (i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault (refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42)? Less Than Significant Impact. Like all of Southern California, the project site is located in an area that is subject to strong ground shaking resulting from earthquakes on nearby faults. However, according to the Geotechnical Exploration and Design report prepared for the proposed Project, the project site is not located within an established Alquist- 0 18! D ATTACHMENT 2, Page 72 of 293 Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone and there are no active faults mapped at the site. 5 The closest mapped fault to the project site is the Newport-Inglewood Fault, which is approximately 6 miles southwest of the project site. Therefore, impacts related to the rupture of a known earthquake fault as depicted on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map are less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. (ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. As previously stated, the project site is located in an active seismic region and could be subject to strong ground shaking as a result of seismic activity. Ground shaking resulting from earthquakes associated with nearby and more distant faults may result in the generation of moderate-to-strong shaking at the project site. The severity of the shaking would be influenced by the distance between the site and the seismic source, the soil conditions, and the depth to groundwater. Damage to development and infrastructure associated with the surrounding areas could be expected as a result of significant ground shaking during a strong seismic event in the region. Because the proposed Project consists of a sidewalk beautification project, it would not include habitable structures, and because the seismicity ofthe area is a current condition of the project site and no new uses are proposed, impacts would be less than significant with adherence to recommendations from the Project specific Geotechnical Report during Design and Construction. Mitigation Measures: GE0-1: Compliance with Geotechnical Investigations. These studies shall be submitted for review and approval by the City of San Juan Capistrano City Engineer, or designee, to ensure that future development has been evaluated at an appropriate level of detail by a professional geologist. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the City Engineer shall confirm that all grading and construction plans incorporate and comply with the recommendations included in the Final Geotechnical Report. Design, grading, and construction shall adhere to all of the seismic requirements incorporated into the most current version of the California Building Code (CBC) and the requirements and standards .contained in the applicable chapters of the City of San Juan Capistrano Municipal Code, as well as appropriate local grading regulations, and the specifications of the project geotechnical consultant. (iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? Less Than Significant Impact. Liquefaction is a phenomenon where water-saturated granular soil loses shear strength during strong ground shaking produced by earthquakes. The loss of soil strength occurs when cyclic pore water pressure increases below the groundwater surface. Potential hazards due to liquefaction include the loss of bearing strength beneath structures, possibly causing foundation failure and/or significant 5 NMG Geotechnical, Inc. (NMG). (2019). Geotechnical Exploration and Design for the Verdugo Street Beautification Project, City of San Juan Capistrano, California. January 31, 2019. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 73 of 293 settlements. According to the project specific geotechnical report, the project site is located within a zone of liquefaction potential. The geotechnical report also determined that groundwater is not anticipated to be encountered during the excavation of the proposed Project improvements. Additionally, the proposed Project would not construct habitable structures. Routine maintenance activities would ensure that any damage to project facilities due to seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction is repaired. Impacts would be less than significant. (iv) Landslides? No Impact. According the City of San Juan Capistrano General Plan EIR the project site is not located within a known or highly suspected landslide area.6 The project site is located on relatively flat land with elevation ranging from 105 feet above mean sea level (msl) to 110 feet above msl. Due to the relatively flat characteristics of the project site and its location in an urban area outside of a suspected landslide area, no impacts due to landslides would occur. (b) Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Less Than Significant Impact. Implementation of the proposed Project would require ground-disturbing activities, such as grading, that could potentially result in soil erosion or loss of topsoil. Construction of the Proposed Project would be required to comply with the Construction General Permit, either through a waiver or through preparation and implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Best Management Practices (BMPs) are included as part of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) prepared for the proposed Project and would be implemented to manage erosion and the loss of topsoil during construction-related activities (see Section 4.9 Hydrology and Water Quality of this Initial Study). The Proposed Project's grading plan would also ensure that the proposed earthwork is designed to avoid soil erosion. Impacts as a result of soil erosion or the loss of topsoil would be less than significant. (c) Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on-or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. Please refer to the responses to Section 4.6 question a), above. No habitable structures would be constructed as part of the proposed Project. Impacts related to an unstable geological unit or soil resulting in on-or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse would be less than significant with the implementation of mitigation measure GE0-1. Mitigation Measures: Refer to Mitigation Measure GE0-1, above. (d) Would the project be located on expansive soil, as defined in the California Building Code (CBC), creating substantial risks to life or property? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. The soils encountered in the borings consisted of artificial fill and older alluvium. The undocumented artificial fill generally 6 City of San Juan Capistrano. (1999a). San Juan Capistrano General Plan: Program Environmental Impact Report Volume 1. December 1999. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 74 of 293 consists of clays and clayey sands with scattered construction debris (brick and tile). According to the project specific geotechnical report the proposed Project has low to medium expansion potential. Project improvements would be designed taking into consideration the recommendations listed in the project specific geotechnical report conducted for the proposed Project by NMG Geotechnical, Inc . Impacts would be less than significant with the incorporation of mitigation measure GE0 -1. Mitigation Measures: Refer to Mitigation Measure GE0-1, above. (e) Would the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? No Impact. The proposed Project consists of beautification improvements to Verdugo Street and would include a new catch basin to replace the existing catch basin , thus ensuring the new curb and gutter alignment drains properly into the existing City sewer system. However, the proposed Project does not include septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems. No impact would occur. (f) Would the project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Less Than Significant Impact. As part of the Cultural Resources Assessment prepared for the San Juan Capistrano Historic Town Center Master Plan Area (Master Plan), Paleontological Resources were assessed for the area within the project site. The assessment determined that the Master Plan area containing the project site is located entirely upon sediments of Quaternary Alluvium and Colluvium. These sediments are less than 10 thousand years old and were deposited by local creeks and rivers including San Juan Creek, Trabuco Creek, Oso Creek and Homo Creek . These formations were determined to be too young to contain fossils . However, at depths of 15 feet or greater below the surface, sediments of the Capistrano Formation are present. This rock unit consists of light brown to dark gray massive siltstone deposited 9-5 million years ago when the area was beneath the ocean . It has produced a wide vari ety of fossil marine life including whale, dolphin, walrus, sea lion, sea cow, shark, ray , fish and other animals and plants. 7 The proposed Project would generally require only shallow excavations of 1'-3', although deeper excavations from four (4) to eight (8) feet may be needed in specific locations for storm drain and water treatment basin improvements. These depths are still above the Capistrano Formation . Project excavations are not anticipated to encounter paleontological resources . A less than significant impact would occur. At the completion of project construction, the proposed project would not result in further disturbance of native soils on the project site. Therefore, operation of the proposed Project would not result in a substantial adverse change in the significance of a paleontological resource as defined in Section 15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines. 7 Cogstone. (2011). Cultural Resources Assessment for the San Juan Capistrano Historic Town Center Master Plan Area. August 2011. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 75 of 293 4.8 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Less Than Significant Would the project: Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant (a) (b) Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the D D 181 n environment? Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of D D [2J D greenhouse gases? Impact Analysis: a. Would the project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Less Than Significant Impact. The only source of greenhouse gas (GHG) em1ss1ons associated with the Proposed Project is from the construction phase. Construction- related activities that would generate GHGs include worker commute trips, haul trucks carrying supplies and materials to and from the Project site, and off-road construction equipment (e .g., dozers, loaders, excavators). Projected GHG emissions from construction have been quantified and amortized over the life of the Project (amortized over 30 years pursuant to SCAQMD guidance). Project emissions are compared to the SCAQMD interim screening level numeric bright-line threshold of 3,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (C02e) annually. If it is determined that the proposed project is estimated to exceed this screening threshold, it will then be compared to the SCAQMD-recommended efficiency-based threshold of 4.8 metric tons of C0 2e per service population per year in 2020, and 3.0 metric tons of C02e per service population per year in 2035. Table 4.8-1 illustrates the specific construction-generated GHG emissions that would result from construction of the Project. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 76 of 293 Table 4.8-1. Construction-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions-Metric Tons/Vear Emissions Source Total Construction Activity 121 Construction Amortized over 30 Years 4 SCAQMD Screening Threshold 3,000 Exceed Threshold? No Source: CalEEMoc/ version 2016.3.2. Refer to Appendix B for Model Data Outputs. Notes: The reduction/credits for construction emissions are based on measures included in CalEEMod and as required by the SCAQMD through Rule 403. This includes the following: properly maintain mobile and other construction equipment; replace ground cover in disturbed areas quickly; water exposed surfaces three times daily; cover stock piles with tarps; water all haul roads twice daily; and limit speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour. Reductions percentages from the SCAQMD CEQA Handbook (Tables XI-A through Xl-E) were applied. As shown in Table 4.8-1, Project construction would result in the generation of approximately 121 metric tons of C02e over the course of construction. Amortized construction emissions equate to 4 metric tons of C02e per year. Neither value would exceed the SCAQMD's interim screening level numeric bright-line threshold of 3,000 metric tons of C02e annually. Therefore, the impact is less than significant . b. Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Less Than Significant Impact. The Proposed Project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. Construction emissions for the Proposed Project are expected to be below the SCAQMD emissions of 3,000 metric tons a year. A less than significant impact would occur. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 77 of 293 Less Than 4.9 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Significant Potentially With Less Than Would the project: Significant Mitigation Significant No Incorporated Impact Impact Impact Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment (a) through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous D D D [81 materials? Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment (b) through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the D 181 D D environment? Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely (c) hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter D D D [8J mile of an existing or proposed school? Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous (d) materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to D D D [81 the public or the environment? For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where (e) such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety D D D [81 hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an (f) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation D D f.8l D plan? (g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wild land fires? D D D l8l Impact Analysis: (a) Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials? No Impact. Hazardous materials are chemicals that could potentially cause harm during an accidental release or mishap, and are defined as being toxic, corrosive, flammable, reactive, and an irritant or strong sensitizer.20 Hazardous substances include all chemicals regulated under the United States Department of Transportation "hazardous materials" regulations and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) "hazardous waste" regulations. Hazardous wastes require special handling and disposal because of their potential to damage public health and the environment. The probable frequency and severity of consequences from the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials is affected by the type of substance, the quantity used or managed, and the nature of the activities and operations. Construction. Potentially hazardous materials that could be used during construction activities would include a limited amount of hazardous and flammable substances/oils (e.g., fuels, lubricants, and solvents) typical during heavy equipment operation for site grading and construction. The amount of hazardous chemicals present during construction is limited and would be in compliance with existing government regulations, such as the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, the Resource Conservation and ATTACHMENT 2, Page 78 of 293 Recovery Act, and the California Code of Regulations (Title 22). The potential for the release of hazardous materials during project construction is low and, even if a release would occur, it would not result in a significant hazard to the public, surrounding land uses, or environment due to the small quantities of these materials associated with construction vehicles. Therefore, impacts with respect to hazardous materials use and storage during construction would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. Operation. With completion of Project improvements, Verdugo Street will continue to operate in much the same manner as it currently does. The Project will not involve any significant change in the use and storage of quantities of potentially hazardous materials (e.g., fuels, solvents, fertilizers, and pesticides) for roadway and landscape maintenance purposes. Operation of the proposed Project as a local street would not require the storage, transportation, generation, or disposal of large quantities of hazardous substances. Therefore, no impacts associated with transportation, use or disposal of hazardous materials would occur. (b) Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Less Than Significant. On-site storage and/or use of large quantities of hazardous materials capable of affecting soil and groundwater are not proposed. However, during construction some hazardous materials, such as diesel fuel, would be used. A SWPPP, listing BMPs to prevent construction pollutants and products from violating any water quality standard or waste discharge requirements would be prepared for the proposed Project. The potential risk associated with accidental discharge during use and storage of equipment-related hazardous materials would be low since the handling of such materials would be addressed through the implementation of BMPs. With the implementation of BMPs, the proposed Project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous material. In the unlikely event that construction workers encounter underground tanks, gases, odors, uncontained spills, or other unidentified substances, the Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) would be contacted to determine next steps regarding site status, sampling, and disposal of the substance consistent with local, State, and federal regulations. (c) Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? No Impact. Portions of three schools are located within 0.25-mile of the Verdugo Street Project Site. These schools are identified below: • Mission Basilica School (located approximately 1,000 feet north ofthe project site) ATTACHMENT 2, Page 79 of 293 • Capistrano-Laguna Beach ROP (located approximately 1,250 feet northeast of the projectsite) • Junipero Serra High School (located approximately 1,300 feet north of the project site) Construction. Project construction activities may involve the onsite use of small amounts of hazardous materials such as fuels, lubricants, and solvents. Compliance with various federal, State, and local regulations related to hazardous materials use, storage, transportation, and disposal is expected to reduce the risk of a spill or accidental release of hazardous materials to a less than significant level. Construction of the proposed project would also include the use of construction equipment that would generate dust and particulate matter during site preparation activities within 0.25 mile of existing schools. These fugitive dust emissions would occur during construction of the proposed project as a result of grading and the exposure of soils to air and wind. However, in order to reduce fugitive dust emissions, the project would be required to comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) standard conditions and Rule 403. These required dust suppression techniques would reduce fugitive dust generation and would reduce construction impacts resulting from hazardous emissions within 0.25 mile of an existing or proposed school to a less than significant level during construction activities. Operation. Although the project site is located within 0.25 mile of several existing schools, continued operation of Verdugo Street would not result in the production of hazardous emissions or handling of significant amounts of hazardous materials. Therefore, operation of the roadway would not emit hazardous emissions or involve handling of hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 0.25 mile of an existing or proposed school during operation. Impacts are considered less than significant. (d) Would the project be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? No Impact. A review of the Department of Toxic Substances Control's Hazardous Waste and Substances List (Cortese List) indicated that the project site is not located on any identified hazardous materials sites.8 Additionally, a review of the State Water Resources Control Board's Leaking Underground Storage Tank {LUST) Geotracker database indicated that there are no listed hazardous material sites within the project vicinity. 9 No impact would occur. (e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? 8 Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). 2019. Hazardous Waste Substances List (Cortese List). Available at: http://www.dtsc..c.a.gov/SlteCleanup/Cortese Llst.c.fm . Accessed on March 5, 2019. 9 State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). 2019. Geotracker Database. Available at: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/7CMD =ru nreport&myaddress=san+luan+ca plstrano . Accessed on March 5, 2019. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 80 of 293 No Impact. No residents would reside within the Project limits and no workers will occupy the site following construction of the street improvements. The closest airport to the project site is John Wayne Airport, located approximately 16 miles northwest of the project site. Therefore, given the nature of the Project and distance of airports from the project site, the proposed project would not create a safety hazard to persons or workers in the area. (f) Would the project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Less Than Significant. The City's General Plan Safety Element (2002) identifies and evaluates natural hazards associated with seismic activity, landslides, flooding and fire within the City. The General Plan Safety Element establishes goals for each of the City departments to provide responsible planning aimed at reducing impacts with respect to loss of life, injuries, damage to property and other losses associated with disasters, such as those resulting from seismic activity, flooding, and fires. According to the City's map of evacuation routes, Verdugo Street is not identified as a potential evacuation route in the event of an emergency. Construction. The proposed project does not include any characteristics (e.g., permanent road closure or long-term blocking of road access) that would physically impair or otherwise conflict with the City's Emergency Preparedness Plan; however, the project may require temporary lane closures on Verdugo Street to accommodate utility connections. Temporary lane closures would be implemented consistent with the recommendations of the Work Area Traffic Control Plan 2016 edition--' ~Manual. In addition, to ensure adequate emergency access, the City will prepare and implement a Construction Staging and Traffic Management Plan (TMP) for approval by City of San Juan Capistrano Ci~y Engineer, or designee. The TMP would require provision of devices to alert traffic (i.e., providing warning signs and lights) and would require that the Orange County Sheriff's Department be notified a minimum of 24 hours in advance of any lane closures or roadway work. The Construction Staging and Traffic Management Plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following: • Temporary lane closures shall be implemented consistent with the recommendations of the California Joint Utility Traffic Control Manual (February 2014). • Flag persons in adequate numbers shall be provided to minimize impacts to traffic flow and to ensure safe access into and out of the site. • Flag persons shall be trained to assist in emergency response by restricting or controlling the movement of traffic that could interfere with emergency vehicle access. • All emergency access to the project site and adjacent areas shall be kept clear and unobstructed during all phases of construction. • Safety precautions shall be provided for pedestrians and bicyclists through such measures as alternate routing and protection barriers. • Construction-related deliveries, other than concrete and earthwork- related deliveries, shall be scheduled so as to reduce travel during peak ATTACHMENT 2, Page 81 of 293 travel periods (i.e., 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m . Monday through Friday). • Construction vehicles, including construction personnel vehicles, shall park on the project site or nearby surface parking lots. • Construction vehicles shall not stage or queue where they interfere with pedestrian and vehicular traffic or block access to nearby businesses. • If feasible, any traffic lane closures shall be limited to off-peak traffic periods, as approved by the City of San Juan Capistrano Department of Public Works and Utilities. • The Orange County Sheriff's Department (OCSD) shall be notified a minimum of 24 hours in advance of any lane closures or other roadway work. • The Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) shall be notified a minimum of 24 hours in advance of any lane closures or other roadway work. With implementation of the City's TMP, no impacts related to emergency response and evacuation plans associated with construction of the proposed project would occur. Operation. The emergency management plans for the City, in conjunction with the emergency plan for the County, may be activated and directE;?d by a number of individuals within the City or County, including, but not limited to, the City Manager, the Fire Chief, and the Police Chief. Roads that are used as response corridors/evacuation routes usually follow the most direct path to or from various parts of a community, although emergency response vehicles may choose to use a variety of routes to access surrounding areas. Del Obispo Street is identified as a primary evacuation route in the City. As with current conditions on Verdugo Street, the Project will comply with all applicable codes and ordinances for emergency vehicle access, which would ensure adequate access to, from, and on site for emergency vehicles. Adherence to these codes and ordinances would ensure that continued use of Verdugo Street would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan and no operational impacts would occur. (g) Would the project expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? No Impact. The project site is located in an urbanized area. The project site is surrounded by adjacent commercial uses to the north and south, Camino Capistrano to the east, and the Metro link rail line to the west. The project site is not adjacent to any wild land areas. According to the City's General Plan Safety Element, the project site is not located in an area identified as a Wild land Fire Area that may contain substantial fire risk or a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. According to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CalFire), the project site is not located in a fire hazard area.25 As a result, the proposed project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wild land fires. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 82 of 293 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated, and no mitigation would be required. 4.10 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Less Than Would the project: Significant Potentially With less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact (a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge D 0 l8l D requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality? (b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere D 0 D ~ substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area , (c) including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, D D l8] 0 or through the addition of impervious surfaces in a manner that would: i) Result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site; 0 0 l8l 0 ii) Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on-or offsite; 0 0 l8] 0 iii) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity 0 0 l8l 0 of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or iv) Impede or redirect flood flows? 0 D D [gl (d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants D D 0 [gl due to project inundation? Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control (e) plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? D 0 l8] D Impact Analysis: (a) Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Project consists of street beautification improvements and does not include material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handling or storage, delivery areas, loading docks or other outdoor work areas. Potential water quality impacts associated with the proposed Project include short-term construction-related erosion/sedimentation and construction-related hazardous material discharge. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 83 of 293 Although the area of ground disturbance affected by the construction of the proposed Project would not exceed one acre, development of the proposed Project would abide by requirements of the statewide National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) stormwater permit for construction activity (Order 98-08 DWQ), and as such would prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Impacts associated with construction-related hazardous materials would be avoided or reduced to a level below significance through implementation of standard construction operating procedures and conformance with the NPDES requirements. Impacts would be less than significant. (b) Would the project substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? No Impact. According to the project specific geotechnical report, groundwater was not encountered during the subsurface investigation to a maximum depth of 16.5 feet, and local groundwater data indicates groundwater is generally deeper than 20 feet bgs. Because excavation activities would not reach this depth, groundwater is not anticipated to be encountered during the excavation of the proposed improvements. As such, groundwater dewatering would not be required during construction. Additionally, water would be provided to the project by the City's Utilities Department, and groundwater extraction is not proposed as part of the project. Therefore, no impacts related to depletion of groundwater supplies or interference with groundwater recharge during construction would occur and no mitigation would be required. (c) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or through the addition of impervious surfaces in a manner that would: i) Result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site; Less Than Significant Impact. Implementation of the proposed Project would require grading and other ground-disturbing activities that could potentially result in soil erosion or loss of topsoil. Construction of the Proposed Project would be required to comply with the Construction General Permit, either through a waiver or through preparation and implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Best Management Practices (BMPs) are included as part of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) prepared for the proposed Project and would be implemented to manage erosion and the loss of topsoil during construction-related activities. The Proposed Project's grading plan would also ensure that the proposed earthwork is designed to avoid soil erosion. Impacts as a result of soil erosion or the loss of topsoil would be less than significant. ii) Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on-or off-site; Less Than Significant Impact. The Proposed Project would continue its existing use and is not anticipated to exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater systems. Impacts to the existing stormwater drainage system would be less than significant. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 84 of 293 iii) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; Less Than Significant Impact. The Proposed Project would continue its existing use and is not anticipated to exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater systems . Impacts to the existing stormwater drainage system would be less than significant. The Project would abide by requirements of the statewide National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) stormwater permit for construction activity (Order 98-08 DWQ), and as such would prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Impacts would be less than significant. iv) Impede or redirect flood flows? No Impact. According to the Flood Insurance Rate Map for the project site (Panel Nos. 06059C0443J), the project area is located within Flood Zone X.1° Flood Zone Xis described as areas of 0.2% annual chance flood; areas of 1% annual chance flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile; and areas protected by levees from 1% annual chance flood. (Federal Emergency Management Agency [FEMA] 2019). The proposed Project would improve drainage along Verdugo Street and include a catch basin feature. Drainage patterns would remain similar to existing conditions. The new catch basin is proposed to replace the existing catch basin, along with new curb and gutter alignments that would ensure proper drainage within the entire Project limits. No impact would occur. (d) Would the project in flood hazard areas, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? No Impact. The Project is not within a flood hazard area. Approximately 3.0 miles from the Pacific Ocean, the Project is not within a tsunami zone. The Project is not near any large body of water susceptible to seiche conditions. The project site is located approximately one-half (1/2) of a mile west of San Juan Creek and 4 miles downstream of the Trampas Canyon Reservoir. According to the FEMA FIRM No . 06059C0443J (December 3, 2009) and the City's General Plan Safety Element (December 1999), the project site is not located within the inundation area of a levee or dam, including the San Juan Creek levees or Trampas Canyon Dam.11 Therefore, the project would not risk release of pollutants due to inundation. No impact would occur. (e) Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? Less Than Significant Impact. Refer to Section 4.10 (a), above. The City will implement a SWPPP listing BMPs to prevent construction pollutants and products from violating any water quality standards. Based on the depth to groundwater and shallow depth of 1° Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2009. National Flood Insurance Program: Flood Insurance Rate Map 06059c0443J. Map Revised December 3, 2009. 11 City of San Juan Capistrano. 1999b. General Plan ATTACHMENT 2, Page 85 of 293 4.11 excavation for project related improvements, groundwater dewatering would not be required during construction. During operat ion the project would continue an existing use and it is anticipated that no substantial new pollutants would be introduced. Due to the depth to groundwater, it is unlikely that pollutants generated during construction or operation would reach groundwater. Therefore, the Project would not conflict or obstruct with a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan. A less than significant impact would occur. Less Than LAND USE AND PLANNING Significant Potentially With Less Than Would the project: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact (a) Physically divide an establi shed community? D D D l'8l (b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a confl ict w ith any land use plan , policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? D D D [81 Impact Analysis: (a) Would the project physically divide an established community? No Impact. The project site consists of an existing local street in the City's Town Center District. The project site is bordered by adjacent commercial uses (theater, restaurants, winery, retail uses) on the north and south sides of the street, Camino Capistrano to the east, and the Metrolink station and rail line to the west. Improvements proposed as part of the Project include features that would enhance the pedestrian experience along Verdugo Street, while maintaining vehicular use and movement. Therefore, construction and implementation of the Project not result in the physical division of an established community, and no mitigation would be required. ATTACHMENT 2 , Page 86 of 293 (b) Would the project cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? No Impact. The project site is a local street within the City's Historic Town Center Master Plan (October 2010) area. Verdugo Street and the Capistrano Depot are identified in the Historic Town Center Master Plan as an area to be revitalized with improvements to the pedestrian connectivity, streetscape and landscape. The Project would implement this vision for the Verdugo Street segment. The Project is consistent with General Plan Community Design Element (May 2002) policies that encourage "a human-scale downtown area which encourages people to walk and interact", and encourage "use of plazas, patios and arcades'. The Project site is located within the City's Town Center Zoning District (TC). The Project is consistent with the TC District Streetscape/Public Realm standards to provide streetscape in support of high pedestrian activity and wide sidewalks to accommodate outdoor dining while providing for comfortable strolling. The Project is not located within a local coastal program area. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted forthe purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect, and no mitigation is required. 4.12 MINERAL RESOURCES Less Than Significant With Potentially Less Than Would the project: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact lmpacr (a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the D D D ~ state? (b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local ger,ieral plan, D D D [81 specific plan or other land use plan? Impact Analysis: (a) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? No Impact. In 1975, the California Legislature enacted the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act which, among other things, provided guidelines for the classification and designation of mineral lands. Areas are classified on the basis of geologic factors without regard to existing land use and land ownership. The mineral land areas are categorized into the following four Mineral Resource Zones (MRZ): • MRZ-1: An area where adequate information indicates that no significant mineral deposits are present, or where it is judged that little likelihood exists for their presence. • MRZ-2: An area where adequate information indicates that significant mineral deposits are present, or where it is judged that a high likelihood exists for their ATTACHMENT 2, Page 87 of 293 presence. • MRZ-3: An area containing mineral deposits, the significance of which cannot be evaluated. • MRZ"4: An area where available information is inadequate for assignment to any other MRZ zone. As noted previously, the Project is located within the City's Historic Town Center Master Plan area. According to the Historic Town Center Master Plan EIR (11/1/11), there are no known mineral resources of value to the region and residents of the State within the limits of development of the Historic Town Center. (b) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? No Impact. The Project is located within the City's Historic Town Center Master Plan area. According to the Historic Town Center Master Plan EIR (11/1/11), there are no locally important mineral resource recovery sites delineated on the local general plan, or in any specific plan, or other land use plan affecting the Historic Town Center Master Plan area. Therefore, implementation ofthe proposed Verdugo Street Project would not result in a significant impact related to the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site. 4.13 NOISE less than Significant With less than Potentially Would the project result in : Significant Mitigation Significant No (a) (b) (c) Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Result in generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in D D lg] D excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Result in generation of excessive groundborne vibration or D D [gJ D groundborne noise levels? For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use D D D lg'I airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Discussion Some land uses are considered more sensitive to intrusive noise than others due to the amount of noise exposure and the types of activi~ies typically involved at the receptor location. Noise exposure at these sensitive receptors is predicated on the magnitude and frequency of said noise event, exposure duration, and exterior-to-interior sound attenuation. Residences, schools, motels and hotels, libraries, religious institutions, hospitals, nursing homes, and parks are generally more sensitive to noise than commercial and industrial land uses. The closest sensitive receptors to the project site include Mission San Juan Capistrano to the northeast and the residences west of the project site. The applicable noise standards governing the project site are the criteria in the City of San Juan Capistrano's Noise Element of the General Plan (Noise Element) and Section 9- ATTACHMENT 2, Page 88 of 293 3.531 of the City's Municipal Code. General Plan. California Government Code Section 65302(g) requires that a noise element be included in the General Plan of each county and city in the State . The Noise Element (1999) of the City of San Juan Capistrano General Plan is intended to identify sources of noise and provide objectives and policies that ensure that noise from various sources does not create an unacceptable noise environment. Overall, the City's Noise Element describes the noise environment (including noise sources) in the City, addresses noise mitigation regulations, strategies, and programs, as well as delineating federal, State, and City jurisdiction relative to rail, automotive, aircraft, and nuisance nqise. The City's noise standards are correlated with land use categories in order to maintain identified ambient noise levels and to limit, mitigate, or eliminate intrusive noise that exceeds the ambient noise levels within a specified zone. The City uses the community noise compatibility guidelines established by the State Department of Health Services as a tool for use in assessing the compatibility of various land use types with a range of noise levels . These guidelines are set forth in the City's General Plan Noise Element in terms of the CNEL. Municipal Code. Section 9-3.531 (d), Special Provisions, of the City's Municipal Code specifies that construction activities that occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m . and 6:00 p.m ., Monday through Friday, or from 8:30 a.m . to 4:30 p.m. on Saturday, shall be exempted from these provisions. No construction shalt be permitted outside of these hours or on Sundays and federal holidays. Impact Analysis: (a) Would the project result in generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Less than Significant Impact. Noise generated by the construction ofthe proposed Project would be temporary and no permanent noise sources would be created. Construction activities would take place within permitted hours (7:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M . Monday through Friday, and 8:30 A.M. to 4:30 P.M. Saturdays) per the City of San Juan Capistrano Municipal Code Section 9-3.531 (d), Special Provisions. The proposed project would continue an existing use; therefore, operational noise levels are anticipated to be similar to existing conditions. Impacts would be less than significant. (b) Would the project result in generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Project would introduce temporary ground- borne vibrations and noise levels in the project vicinity related to the use of construction equipment. The potential impacts would diminish with distance. There are no sensitive receptors located within 25 feet of the site that would otherwise be affected by vibration.12 Additionally, construction activities would be restricted to day time hours consistent with the City of San Juan Capistrano Municipal Code requirements, thereby eliminating potential vibration impacts during the sensitive nighttime hours. The 12 Federal Transit Administration {FTA). 2006 . Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 89 of 293 vibration from the use of construction equipment would cease at the completion of daily construction activities. A less than significant impact would occur . (c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact. There are no private airst rips within the vicinity ofthe project site. The closest airport to the project site is John Wayne Airport located approximately 16 miles to the north of the project site . The project site is not located within a Noise Impact Zone for John Wayne Airport.13 As such, no impact would occur. Less Than 4.14 POPULATION AND HOUSING Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Sign ificant No Would the project: Impact Incorporated Impact Impact (a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (fo r example, by proposi ng new homes and businesses) or D D D ~ indirectly (for example, through extension of roads o r other infrastructure)? (b) Displace substantial numbers of people or existing housing, D D D l8J necessitati ng the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Impact Analysis: (a) Would the project induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? No Impact. The Project proposes street beautification measures designed to revitalize and enhance the pedestrian experience. No additional road capacity is proposed. The Project is not of a type or scale that would induce substantial growth, either directly or indirectly. No impact would occur. (b) Would the project displace substantial numbers of people or existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact. The Project is a street beautification project. No people or housing would be displaced, and no mitigation would be required. 13 Orange County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC). 2008. Airport Land Use Commission Airport Environs Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport. Amended April 17, 2008. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 90 of 293 Less Than 4.15 PUBLIC SERVICES. Slgnlflcant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Would the project: Impact Incorporat ed Impact Impact (a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, the const r uction of which could cause significant env ironmental D D D ~ impacts, in orde r to maintain acceptable service r atios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: i) Fire Protection? D 0 0 ~ ii) Police Protection? 0 D 0 [gi iii) Schools ? 0 0 D ~ iv) Parks? D D D ~ v) Othe r public facilities? 0 D D ~ Impact Analysis: (a) (i). Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of or need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for fire protection? No Impact. Fire protection services in the Project area are provided by the Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA). OCFA is a Joint Powers Authority responsible for reducing loss of life and property due to fire, medical, and environmental emergencies . The City is located in Division Ill , which includes Battalions 6 and 7, and serves the Cities of San Juan Capistrano , Mission Viejo, Rancho Santa Margarita, San Clemente, and Dana Point, and the communities of Coto de Caza, Las Flores, and Ladera Ranch. 14 Fire Station No. 7 is the only OCFA station located in the City. Located at 31865 Del Obispo Street, San Juan Capistrano (approximately 0 .25 mile southeast of the project site), Fire Station No. 7 would be the first to the project site in the event of an emergency and would be the "first-in" station. Station No . 7 is staffed by three captains, three engineers, nine firefighters, and reserve firefighters . The Project proposes street improvements to beautify and enhance Verdugo Street, an existing local street. No new buildings or structures requiring fire protection are proposed. Fire emergency access to and through the Project area will be maintained 14 Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA). 2019. Website. Available at: https:/lwww .o cfa.org/. Accessed on March 5, 2019 . ATTACHMENT 2, Page 91of293 through the construction phase with implementation of the City's Traffic Management Plan (TMP) (see Section 4.8(g)). Following construction, normal vehicular access and fire emergency access to and through the Project area will be maintained, similar to the existing condition. No impacts to fire protection services would occur and no mitigation measures are required. (a) (ii). Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of or need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for police protection? No Impact. The City contracts with the Orange County Sheriff's Department (OCSD) for police protection services. OCSD provides 24-hour contract law enforcement services to the City. The OCSD Police Services Station, located at 32506 Paseo Adelanto in San Juan Capistrano, approximately 0.66 mile southwest of the project site, also serves the City. The City's police staffing levels are based on response times and crime rates in the City. Emergency calls receive the quickest response, with alarm calls and non-emergency calls having longer response times. Response times for the City for both Priority 1 (i.e., red light/siren) and Priority 2 (i.e., urgent, no lights/siren) are 3.47 minutes and 6.76 minutes, respectively. The Project proposes street improvements to beautify and enhance Verdugo Street, an existing local street. Police response and access to and through the Project area will be maintained through the construction phase with implementation of the City's Traffic Management Plan (TMP) (see Section 4.8(g)). Following construction, normal police response to the Project area will be maintained, similar to the existing condition. No impacts to police protection services would occur and no mitigation measures are required. (a) (iii). Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of or need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for schools? No Impact. The Project proposes street improvements to beautify and enhance Verdugo Street, an existing local street. No physical impacts associated with new or physically altered governmental facilities that could directly or indirectly affect schools would result from construction or operation of the Project. No mitigation measures are required. (a) (iv). Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of or need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for parks? No Impact. The Project proposes street improvements to beautify and enhance Verdugo Street, an existing local street. No physical impacts associated with new or physically altered governmental facilities that could directly or indirectly affect parks would result ATTACHMENT 2, Page 92 of 293 from construction or operation of the Project. No mitigation measures are required. (a) (v). Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of or need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for other facilities? No Impact. The Project proposes street improvements to beautify and enhance Verdugo Street, an existing local street. No physical impacts associated with new or physically altered governmental facilities that could directly or indirectly affect other governmental facilities, including libraries, would result from construction or operation of the Project. No mitigation measures are required. 4.16 RECREATION less Than Significant Would the project: Potentially With less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact (a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical D D D 181 deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? (b) Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might D D D 181 have an adverse physic;al effect on the environment? Impact Analysis: (a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? No Impact. The Project proposes street improvements to beautify and enhance Verdugo Street, an existing local street. No physical impacts associated with new or physically altered governmental facilities that could directly or indirectly affect existing neighborhood and regional parks, or other recreational facilities would result from construction or operation of the Project . No mitigation measures are required. (b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? No Impact. The Project proposes street improvements to beautify and enhance Verdugo Street, an existing local street. While proposed improvements would enhance the pedestrian experience, new or expanded recreational facilities that could have an adverse physical effect on the environment are proposed. No impact would occur, and no mitigation measures are required. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 93 of 293 4.17 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC Less Than Significant Would the project: Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Sign ificant No Impact Incor porated Impact Impact (a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system , including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? D D ~ D (b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? D D D [gl (c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e . g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or D D ~ D incompatible uses (e .g., farm equipment)? (d) Result in inadequate emergency access? D D ~ D Discussion: This section analyzes the transportation and traffic impacts that may result due to development of the proposed Project . The discussion and analysis provided in this section is based on the Verdugo Street Beautification Project Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) (Pirzaheh & Associates).15 The TIA was prepared consistent with the objectives and requirements of the City's Administrative Policy No. 310, the City's General Plan Circulation Element and Growth Management Element (December 1999), the Orange County Congestion Management Program (CMP) (November 2015), and applicable provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), including disclosure of project impacts in both existing and cumulative horizon years. The TIA examined the following four scenarios: 1. Existing Without Project 2. Existing With Project 3. Year 2020 With Project 4. Year 2020 With Project With Future Access Scenarios Based on input from the City Staff the TIA included analysis of four locations, including the driveway off of Camino Capistrano approximately 795 feet north of Ortega Highway (Driveway 1), the signalized intersection of Camino Capistrano/Ortega Highway, the signalized intersection of Camino Capistrano/Verdugo Street, and driveway off of Camino Capistrano approximately 245 feet south of Verdugo Street (Driveway 2). Additionally, the analysis examined special issues relevant to the proposed Project, these include impacts during construction, special events, loading/unloading zones, and potential City 15 Pirzadeh & Associates. 2019. City of San Juan Capistrano Verdugo Street Beautification Project (CIP 14106) Traffic Impact Analysis. February 22, 2019. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 94 of 293 projects. Analysis Methodology Per discussion's with City staff, the study locations were analyzed using methodologies from the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 61h Edition to determine the intersection Level of Service (LOS). Intersection LOS is a measure of the control delay experienced at the intersection and is defined as seconds per vehicle. It is used to quantify the amount oftravel time increase. There are 6 LOS thresholds that range from A to F. LOS A has the least control Delay and LOS F has the most control delay. The following is a description of LOS thresholds from HCM. LOS A: This level is typically assigned when the volume-to-capacity ratio is low and either progression is exceptionally favorable, or the cycle length is very short. If LOS A is the result of favorable progression, most vehicles arrive during the green indication and travel through the intersection without stopping. LOS B: This level is typically assigned when the volume-to-capacity ratio is low and either progression is highly favorable, or the cycle length is short. More vehicles stop than with LOS A. LOS C: This level is typically assigned when progression is favorable, or the cycle length is moderate. Individual cycle failures (i.e., one or more queued vehicles are not able to depart as a result of insufficient capacity during the cycle) may begin to appear at this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant, although many vehicles will pass through the intersection without stopping. LOS D: This level is typically assigned when the volume to capacity ratio is high and either the progression is ineffective, or the cycle length is long. Many vehicles stop, and individual cycle failures are noticeable. LOSE: This level is typically assigned when the volume-to-capacity ratio is high, progression is unfavorable, and the cycle length is long. Individual cycle failures are frequent. LOS F: This level is typically assigned when the volume-to-capacity ratio is very high, progression is very poor, and the cycle length is long. Most cycles fail to clear the queue. Threshold of Significance Per the City of San Juan Capistrano General Plan Circulation Element, the acceptable LOS is D at intersection other than "Traffic Operations Hot Spots". None of the study locations are designated as a hot spot. Impact Analysis: (a) Would the project conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? Less Than Significant Impact. Construction Impacts. The proposed Project would generate short-term construction related vehicle trips . However, traffic generated by construction of the Proposed Project would be temporary and would not conflict with the City of San Juan Capistrano Circulation Element. Impacts would be less than significant. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 95 of 293 Operational Impacts. Operation impacts are anticipated to be similar to existing conditions because the proposed Project would continue an existing use. Impacts would be less than significant . Additionally, the traffic impact analysis prepared for the proposed Project determined that all Project driveways (Location 1: Camino Capistrano at Driveway 1, Location 2: Camino Capistrano at Ortega Highway, Location 3 : Camino Capistrano at Verdugo Street, and Location 4: Camino Capistrano at Driveway 2) are forecast to operate at satisfactory LOS D · or better For Existing With Project, Year 2020 Wit.h Project, and Year 2020 With Project With Future Access Scenario conditions, as summarized below. A less than significant impact would occur. Driveway locations are shown in Figure 4. Existing With Project The Existing With Project scenario evaluated the performance at the study locations with the implementation of the proposed Project . Under this scenario all study locations will continue to operate at LOS C or better, which is an acceptable LOS, in the Existing With Project scenario. Vear 2020 With Project The Year 2020 With Project scenario evaluated the performance at the study location with the implementation of the proposed Project using projected Year 2020 trips. Under this scenario all study locations will continue to operate at LOS C or better, which is an acceptable LOS, in the Year 2020 With Project scenario . Vear 2020 With Project With Future Access The Year 2020 With Project With Future Access scenario evaluated the performance at the study location with the implementation of the proposed Project plus the potential future right-turn in only access into the Metrolink/Amtrak station surface parking lot using projected Year 2020 trips. Under this scenario all study locations will continue to operate at LOS C or better, which is an acceptable LOS, in the Year 2020 With Project With Future Access scenario. (b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? No Impact. Section 15064.3 describes specific considerations for evaluating a project's transportation impacts with reference to vehicle miles traveled as an appropriate measure of impacts. 'Vehicle miles traveled' refers to the amount and distance of automobile travel attributable to a project. Transportation projects that either reduce, or have no impact on, vehicle miles traveled are presumed to cause a less than significant transportation impact. For roadway projects, agencies have discretion to determine the appropriate measure of transportation impact consistent with CEQA and local requirements. The Verdugo Street Beautification Project will have no impact on vehicle miles traveled. Under all project traffic study scenarios, all study locations will continue to operate at LOS C or better, which is an acceptable LOS . The provisions of Section 15064.3 are not applicable statewide until July 1, 2020. The Project is not in conflict or inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines 15064.3, and no impact would occur. ATTACHMENT 2 , Page 96 of 293 N.T.S. Metrolink/Amtrak Surface Parking Lot Source: Pirzadeh & Associates, Inc. 2019 ECQRJ> Consulllng lnc. ---r,:-,,U(l'lNM[.i:'l.l"AI f"OXSlllrT1\~T:; Verdugo Street Franciscan Plaza Parking Structure Driveway2 ® Ortega Hwy LEGEND • Study Location @Signalized Intersection --Ped Railroad Crossing Figure 4. Study Locations 2018-246 Verdugo Street Beautification Project ATTACHMENT 2, Page 97 of 293 (c) Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Less Than Significant Impact. The Verdugo Street Beautification Project ('Project') consists of the construction of widened sidewalks, landscaping, irrigation, storm drain, utilities, ADA ramps, rolled curb, enhanced paving, enhanced lighting, and street furniture, to provide for a more pedestrian friendly downtown adjacent to the City's train station, parking structure, and the Historic Los Rios District. Improvements associated with the proposed Project would be designed by a registered civil engineer to meet the City of San Juan Capistrano's development standards. Additionally, the results of the traffic analysis prepared forthe proposed Project demonstrated that all Project driveways and the Camino Capistrano/Verdugo Street and Camino Capistrano and Ortega Highway intersections are forecast to operate at satisfactory LOS D or better For Existing With Project, Year 2020 With Project, and Year 2020 With Project With Future Access scenario conditions. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in any impacts related to hazards associated with a design feature or incompatible uses, and no mitigation would be required. (d) Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? Less Than Significant. The City's General Plan Safety Element (2002) identifies and evaluates natural hazards associated with seismic activity, landslides, flooding and fire within the City. According to the City's map of evacuation routes, Verdugo Street is not identified as a potential evacuation route in the event of an emergency. In addition, to ensure adequate emergency access, the City will prepare and implement a Construction Staging and Traffic Management Plan (TMP) for approval by City of San Juan Capistrano City Engineer, or designee (see Section 4.8(g). With implementation of the City's TMP, adequate emergency access will be maintained, and the impact would be less than significant. Less Than 4.18 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Would the project: Impact Incorporated Impact Impact (a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: (i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of (gJ D D Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources D as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.l(k), or (ii) supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall D ~ D D consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 98 of 293 (a) (i) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.l(k)? OR (b) (ii) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. The following responses address the thresholds in Sections 4.18 {a) and 4.18 {b). Chapter 532, Statutes of 2014 {i.e., Assembly Bill [AB] 52), requires that Lead Agencies evaluate a project's potential to impact "tribal cultural resources." Such resources include "[s]ites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe that are eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources or included in a local register of historical resources." AB 52 also gives Lead Agencies the discretion to determine, supported by substantial evidence, whether a resource qualifies as a "tribal cultural resource." Also, per AB 52 (specifically Public Resources Code [PRC] 21080.3.1), Native American consultation is required upon request by a California Native American tribe that has previously requested that the City of San Juan Capistrano (City) provide it with notice of such projects. The City currently maintains the following list of Tribal Councils that have requested formal notification of proposed projects pursuant to AB 52: • Juaneiio Band of Mission Indians Acjachemen Nation, Joyce Perry, Tribal Manager. Requested to be added to the City's list of Tribal Councils on August 15, 2015. • Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians, Michael Mirelez, Cultural Resource Coordinator. Requested to be added to the City's list of Tribal Councils on May 12, 2015. • Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, Joseph Ontiveros, Cultural Resource Director. Requested to be added to the City's list of Tribal Councils on June 12, 2015. The City also maintains a list of tribal councils based on a list of councils and corresponding Native American representatives provided to the City by the Native American Heritage Commission {NAHC) on December 27, 2017. The proposed project does not involve SB 18 or require SB 18 consultation.49 The City sent letters for the purposes of AB 52 consultation and NAHC notification to all three Tribal Councils listed above on April 2, 2019. One tribe responded to the City's request for consultation -Juaneiio Band of Mission Indians Acjachemen Nation, Joyce Perry, Tribal Manager. On April 24, 2019, at the request of Ms. Perry the city consulted via a conference call. MS. Perry provided an oral history ofthe site and indicated that the site is historically and culturally sensitive. Ms. Perry inquired on the depth of excavation and 49 SB 18 (Chapter 905, Statues of 2004) requires cities and counties to contact and consult with California Native American tribes prior to amending or adopting any general plan or specific plan or designating land as open space. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 99 of 293 disturbance and requested that the project include a mitigation measure that requires Archaeological and Native American Monitoring. As discussed in Section 4.5 (a), the immediate Verdugo Street project site within street right-of- way limits does not contain any known "historical resources" as defined by the CEQA. Therefore, the proposed project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5 ofthe Stc;ite CEQA Guidelines or PRC 5020.l(k). As discussed in Section 4.5 (b), there is potential for subsurface archaeological deposits below the ground surface .on the project site. Consequently, Mitigation Measure CUL-1 requires that an archaeological monitor be on site during ground-disturbing activities to monitor for buried prehistoric or historic material. Additionally, the project would be required to comply with Mitigation Measure CUL-2, which outlines procedures for recovering any significant or unique archaeological resources and for preparation of a report that documents the monitoring and any recovery at the site. Implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL-1 and CUL-2 would reduce any potential impacts to previously undiscovered archaeological resources to a less than significant level. Mitigation Measure TCR-1 requires the presence of a Native American monitor during ground- disturbing activities, as requested during the consultation processes conducted for the project. Implementation of Mitigation Measure TCR-1 would reduce any potential impacts to previously undiscovered tribal cultural resources to a less than significant level. Therefore, on this basis and as a result of the City's consultation efforts, the City has concluded that, with implementation of Mitigation Measure TCR-1, potential impacts related to unknown buried tribal cultural resources would also be reduced below a level of significance. Mitigation Measure: TCR-1 Tribal Cultural Resources: Monitoring Procedures. Prior to commencement of any ground-disturbing activities, the City will assure that a qualified Native American monitor has been retained to provide Native American monitoring services during ground-disturbing activities in native soils. Because no known resources have been identified on the site, monitors are not required on a full- time basis, but shall spot check ground-disturbing activities in compliance with the monitoring procedures outlined in the Monitoring Plan (which itself is required as part of Mitigation Measure CUL-2) to ensure that no resources are impacted during construction. The Native American monitor shall be selected by the project Archaeologist in coordination with the Juaneno Band of Mission Indians-Acjachemen Nation. The Native American monitor shall be present at the pre-grading conference to establish procedures for tribal cultural resource surveillance. Those procedures shall include provisions for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit sampling, identification, and evaluation of resources deemed by the Native American monitor to be tribal cultural resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074. These procedures shall be reviewed and approved by the City of San Juan Capistrano Community Department Director, or designee, prior to commencement of any surface disturbance on the project site. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 100 of 293 Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than 4.19 UTILITIES/SERVICE SYSTEMS. Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: (a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water D D [8] D drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry D D [8] D and multiple dry years? (c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provide r which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate D D D ~ capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? (d) Generate solid waste in excess of State o r local standards, or in D D [8] D excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste goals? (e ) Comply with federal, state , and local management and D D D [8] reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Impact Analysis: (a) Would the project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Project would not create the need for new or expanded water or wastewater treatment facilities because it would not substantially increase the amount of water needed or wastewater generated compared to the existing conditions of the project site. Once the proposed improvements are constructed, the existing use of the site would remain . The proposed Project would have nominal new water needs as a result of the addition of new trees/landscaping. These water needs are not considered substantial. The proposed Project would result in no increase in wastewater treatment requirements. A less than significant impact would occur . The proposed Project would not require or result in the construction or expansion of offsite stormwater drainage facilities . The proposed Project would construct a new catch basin to replace the existing catch basin, thus ensuring the new curb and gutter alignment drains properly. This catch basin would capture stormwater until capacity is reached then overflow into the city drainage facilities . Additionally, during construction, the proposed Project would implement a construction SWPPP, which includes BMPs. A less than significant impact would occur. The proposed Project may require relocation of underground electric power, natural gas or telecommunications facilities within Verdugo Street. Construction plans will be coordinated with affected utilities. The disposition of an existing electrical vault within the right-of-way will be coordinated with San Diego Gas & Electric (SDGE). No significant expansion of use of these utilities is anticipated or required and the impact would be less than significant. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 101 of 293 (b} Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Project would not substantially increase the demand for water compared to existing conditions along Verdugo Street., The proposed Project would utilize water for dust control during construction and would have a nominal increase over existing conditions in operational water needs for landscape irrigation. Water conserving landscape and irrigation design will be utilized. The additional operation water needs associated with irrigation for new trees and landscaping would not be considered substantial. A less than significant impact would occur. (c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? No Impact. The proposed Beautification Project would not generate new wastewater sources or demand for wastewater treatment. The proposed Project consists of various improvements along Verdugo Street including widened sidewalks, landscaping, irrigation, storm drain, utilities, ADA ramps, rolled curb, enhanced paving, enhanced lighting, and street furniture. No impact would occur. (d} Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? Less Than Significant Impact. Project demolition or construction waste would be disposed of at the Prima Deshecha Landfill, Frank R. Bowerman Landfill, or the Olinda Landfill which are all permitted to accept commercial waste.16 The minimal increase in waste generated by the proposed Project is not anticipated to affect the permitted capacity ofthese landfills. A less than significant impact would occur. (e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? No Impact. Waste generated by the proposed Project would comply with solid waste statutes and regulation. No impact would occur. 16 OC Waste and Recycling. 2019. Active Landfills. Available at: http:ljwww.otlandfllts.com/contact/landfills. Accessed on March 5, 2019. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 102 of 293 4.20 WILDFIRE Less Than Sign ificant If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified at very Potential With Less Than ly Mitigation Significant No high fire hazard severity zones, would the Project: Signiflca Incorporated Impact Impact nt Impact (a) Substantially impair an adopted em ergency response plan o r D D D ~ emergency evacuation plan? (b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks , and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant 0 0 0 ~ concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? (c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated 0 D D !8l infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? (d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of 0 D D 18] runoff, post-fi re slope instability, or drainage changes? If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project? a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? No Impact. The Project is not located in or near a state responsibility area or other lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones. No impact would occur. b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? No Impact. The Project is not located in or near a state responsibility area or other lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones. No impact would occur. c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? No Impact. The Project is not located in or near a state responsibility area or other lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones . No impact would occur. d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? No Impact. The Project is not located in or near a state responsibility area or other lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones. No impact would occur ATTACHMENT 2, Page 103 of 293 Less Than 4.21 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Sign ificant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Does the Project: Impact Incorporated Impact Impact (a) Have the potential to subs ta ntially degrade the quality of the D 12) D D environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species , cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustain ing levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the ra nge of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory ? (b) Have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the D D l8J D incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of pa st projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects?) (c) Have environmental effects which will cause substantial adve rse D D ~ D effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? (a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation. Impacts to biological and cultural resources are discussed in their respective section of this Initial Study . Impacts would be less than significant with Mitigation Measure BI0-1, CUL-1, CUL-2, CUL-3, and TCR -1. (b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects?) Less Than Significant Impact. Impacts associated with the proposed Project are confined to the Project site and immediate vicinity and would not be cumulatively considerable . (c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Less Than Significant Impact. The propose Verdugo Street Beautification Project would promote pedestrian activity, enhance the user experience, and retain acceptable levels of service for vehicles on surrounding driveways and roadways. Direct and indirect impacts to human beings would be less than significant. ATTACHMENT 2 , Page 104 of 293 5.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 5.1 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21081.6 (enacted by the passage of Assembly Bill [AB] 3180) mandates that the following requirements shall apply to all reporting or mitigation monitoring programs: • The public agency shall adopt a reporting or monitoring program for the changes made to the project or conditions of project approval in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment. The reporting or monitoring program shall be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation. For those changes which have been required or incorporated into the project at the request of a Responsible Agency or a public agency having jurisdiction by law over natural resources affected by the project, that agency shall, if so requested by the Lead Agency or a Responsible Agency, prepare and submit a proposed reporting or monitoring program. • The Lead Agency shall specify the location and custodian of the documents or other material, which constitute the record of proceedings upon which its decision is based. A public agency shall provide the measures to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment that are fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other measures. Conditions of project approval may be set forth in referenced documents which address required mitigation measures or in the case of the adoption of a plan, policy, regulation, or other project, by incorporating the mitigation measures into the plan, policy, regulation, or project design. • Prior to the close of the public review period for a draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), a Responsible Agency, or a public agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by the project, shall either submit to the Lead Agency complete and detailed performance objectives for mitigation measures which would address the significant effects on the environment identified by the Responsible Agency or agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by the project, or refer the Lead Agency to appropriate, readily available guidelines or reference documents. Any mitigation measures submitted to a Lead Agency by a Responsible Agency or an agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by the project shall be limited to measures that mitigate impacts to resources, which are subject to the statutory authority of, and definitions applicable to, that agency. Compliance or noncompliance by a Responsible Agency or agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by a project with that requirement shall not limit that authority of the Responsible Agency or agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by a project, or the authority ofthe Lead Agency, to approve, condition, or deny projects as provided by this division or any other provision of law. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 105of293 5.2 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROCEDURES The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) has been prepared in compliance with PRC Section 21081.6. It describes the requirements and procedures to be followed by the City of San Juan Capistrano to ensure that all mitigation measures adopted as part of the proposed project will be carried out as described in this IS/MND. Table 5.2-1 lists each of the mitigation measures specified in this document and identifies the party or parties responsible for implementation and monitoring of each measure. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 106 of 293 )> -i );! () :r s: m z -i I\.) '"'O ll> co CD -" 0 --..! 0 -I\.) (.!) w T bl 5 2 l M". M a e -. 1t1qat1on Mitigation Measures 4.1 Aesthetics The proposed project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to aesthetics . No mitigation would be required. 4.2 A_gricultural & Forest Resources The proposed project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to agriculture and forest resources. No mitigation would be required. 4.3 Air Quality The proposed project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to air quality. No mitigation would be required. 4.4 Biqlagical Resources BI0-1 Migratory Bird Treaty Act. In the event that construction activities occur during the breeding season (February 15-August 15), the Applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a nesting bird survey within 5 days prior to commencement of construction activities. The nesting bird survey shall identify and document active nesting within 100 feet of the construction limits. If nesting birds are discovered during preconstruction surveys, the biologists shall identify an appropriate buffer (i.e., up to 500 feet depending on the circumstances and specific bird species) where no construction activities or other disturbances are allowed to occur until after the birds have fledged from the nest . Prior to commencement of grading activities and issuance of any building permits, the City of San Juan Capistrano Director of Development Services, or designee, shall verify that all project grading and construction plans include specific documentation regarding the requirements of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), that preconstruction surveys have been completed and the results reviewed by staff, and that the appropriate buffers (if needed) are noted on the plans and established in the field with orange snow fencing. 4.5 Cultural Resources CUL-1: Archaeological Monitor. Prior to issuance of grading permits, and in adherence to the recommendations of the cultural resources records search, the Applicant shall retain, with approval of the City of San Juan omtormq an dR eportmQ p rogram Timing for Standard Compliance Verification Condition or Mitigation (Date and Signature Responsible Party Measure Required) City of San Juan In the event that Capistrano Development construction activities Services Director, or occur during the breeding designee season (February 15- August 15)/ Prior to commencement of grading activities and issuance of any building permits. City of San Juan Prior to issuance of Capistrano Development grading permits Services Director, or ~ ~ () I s:: m z -; N "'O 0,) <O (I) -->. 0 00 0 -N <O (>) Capistrano (City) Development Services Director, or designee, a qualified archaeological monitor. Monitoring by a qualified archaeologist should be conducted under the supervision of an Orange County Certified archaeologist and by a Native American monitor from one of the Juaiieno groups recognized by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). Monitoring will be conducted in accordance with the City of San Juan Capistrano's Council Policy 601 on historic, archaeological, and paleontological resource management.17 The monitor shall be present on the project site during ground-disturbing activities to monitor rough and finish grading, excavation, and other ground-disturbing activities in the native soils. Because no cultural resources were identified on the project site, archaeological monitors are not required to be present on a full-time basis but shall spot check ground-disturbing activities to ensure that no cultural resources are impacted during construction activities. The exact timing of monitoring activities shall be consistent with the provisions established in the Monitoring Plan, which is required as part of Mitigation Measure CUL-2. CUL-2: Archaeological Monitoring Plan and Accidental Discovery. Prior to commencement of any grading activities on site, the Applicant shall retain a qualified archaeologist to prepare a Monitoring Plan. The Monitoring Plan shall be prepared by a qualified archaeologist and shall be reviewed by the City Development Services Director, or designee. The Monitoring Plan should include at a minimum: (1) a list of personnel involved in the monitoring activities; (2) a description of how the monitoring shall occur; (3) a description of the frequency of monitoring (e.g., full-time, part-time, spot checking); (4) a description of what resources may be encountered; (5) a description of circumstances that would result in the halting of work at the project site (e.g., what is considered a "significant" archaeological site); (6) a description of procedures for halting work on site and notification procedures; and (7) a description of monitoring reporting procedures. If any significant historical resources, archaeological resources, or human remains are found during monitoring, work shall be stopped within the immediate vicinity (precise area to be determined by the archaeologist in the field) of the resource until such time as the resource can be evaluated by an archaeologist and any other appropriate individuals. Project personnel shall not collect or designee City of San Juan Capistrano Development Services Director, or designee/ City Department of Public Works and Utilities Director, or designee Prior to commencement of any grading activities on site/During project excavation and grading activities ::; -i )> () I s: m z -i N "U w CQ CD ...... 0 c.o 8. N c.o w move any archaeological materials or human remains and associated materials. To the extent feasible, project activities shall avoid these deposits. Where avoidance is not feasible, the archaeological deposits shall be evaluated for their eligibility for listing on the California Register of Historic Places. If the deposits are not eligible, avoidance is not necessary. If the deposits are eligible, adverse effects on the deposits must be avoided, or such effects must be mitigated . Mitigation can include, but is not necessarily limited to: leaving the deposits in place, excavation of the deposit in accordance with a data recovery plan (see California Code of Regulations [CCR] Title 4(3) Section 5126.4(b)(3)(C)) and standard archaeological field methods and procedures; laboratory and technical analyses of recovered archaeological materials; production of a report detailing the methods, findings, and significance of the archaeological site and associated materials; curation of archaeological materials at an appropriate facility for future research and/or display; an interpretive display of recovered archaeological materials at a local school, museum, or library; and public lectures at local schools and/or historical societies on the findings and significance of the site and recovered archaeological materials. It shall be the responsibility of the City Building Official, or designee, to verify that the Monitoring Plan is implemented during project excavation and grading. Upon completion of all monitoring/mitigation activities, the consulting archaeologist shall submit a monitoring report to the City Development Services Director, or designee, and to the South-Central Coastal Information Center summarizing all monitoring/mitigation activities and confirming that all recommended mitigation measures have been met. The monitoring report shall be prepared consistent with the guidelines of the Office of Historic Preservation's Archaeological Resources Management Reports (ARMR): Recommended Contents and Format. The City Development Services Director, or designee, shall be responsible for reviewing any reports produced by the archaeologist to determine the appropriateness and adequacy of the findings and recommendations. CUL-3:Human Remains. Consistent with the requirements of CCR Section 15064.5(e), if human remains are encountered during site disturbance, grading, or other construction activities on the project site, the construction contractor shall halt work within 25 feet of the discovery; all City of San Juan If human remains are Capistrano Development encountered during site Services Director, or disturbance, grading, or designee other construction ~ -i )> () I s:: m z -i I\.) "U tu co CD ....... ....... 0 0 -I\.) c.o w work shall be redirected and the Orange County (County) Coroner notified immediately. No further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097 .98 . If the remains are determined to be Native American, the County Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). The MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD shall complete the inspection within 48 hours of notification by the NAHC. The MLD may recommend scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials . Consistent with CCR Section 15064.5(d), if the remains are determined to be Native American and an MLD is notified, the City shall consult with the MLD identified by the NAHC to develop an agreement for the treatment and disposition of the remains . Upon completion of the assessment, the consulting archaeologist shall prepare a report documenting the methods and results and provide recommendations regarding the treatment of the human remains and any associated cultural materials, as appropriate, and in coordination with the recommendations of the MLD. The report shall be submitted to the City Development Services Director, or designee, and the South -Central Coastal Information Center. The City Development Services Director, or designee, shall be responsible for reviewing any reports produced by the archaeologist to determine the appropriateness and adequacy of the findings and recommendations . 4.6 Energy The proposed project would not re sult in significant adverse impacts related to energy. No mitigation is required . 4. 7 Geology and Soils GE0-1: Compliance with Geotechnical Investigations. These studies shall be submitted for review and approval by the City of San Juan Capistrano City Engineer, or designee, to ensure that future development has been evaluated at an appropriate level of detail by a professional geologist . Prior to issuance of grading permits, the City Engineer shall confirm that all grading and construction plans i ncorporate and comply with the recommendations included in the Final Geotechnical Report. Design, activities on the project site City of San Juan Prior to issuance of Capistrano Engineer, or grading permits designee }> -i i! () I s:: m z -i N ""O ru ca CD ....... ....... ....... 0 -N CD w grading, and construction shall adhere to all of the seismic requirements incorporated into the most current version of the California Building Code (CBC) and the requirements and standards contained in the applicable chapters of the City of San Juan Capistrano Municipal Code, as well as appropriate local grading regulations, and the specifications of the project geotechnical consultant. 4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions The proposed project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to greenhouse gas emissions. No mitigation would be required . 4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials The proposed project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials. No mitigation would be required. 4.10 l:lydr<:ilogy and Water Qu_ality The proposed project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to Hydrology and Water Quality . No mitigation would be required . 4.11 Land Use/Plan The proposed project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to Land Use and Planning . No mitigation would be required. 4.12 Mineral Resources The proposed project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to mineral resources. No m itigation would be req uired . 4.13 Noise The proposed project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to noise. No mitigation would be req uired. 4.14 PopulatiQl'l and Heusing The proposed project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to population and hous ing . No mitigation would be required. 4.15 Public Services and Utilities The proposed project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to public services and utilities. No mitigation would be required. 4.16 Recreation The proposed project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to recreation. No mitigation would be requi red. 4.17 Transj>or:tatie.ri/Traffic The proposed project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to transportation/traffic. No mitigation would be required 4:181ribal C:ultural Resou re es TCR-1. Prior to commencement of any ground-disturbing activities, the Director of the City of Prior to commencement City will assure that a qualified Native American monitor has been San Juan Capistrano of any ground disturbing retained to provide Native American monitoring services during ground-Community activities disturbing activities in native soils . Because no known resources have been Development identified on the site, monitors are not required on a full-time basis, but Department, or designee shall spot check ground-disturbing activities in compliance with the monitoring procedures outlined in the Monitoring Plan (which itself is required as part of Mitigation Measure CUL-2) to ensure that no resources are impacted during construction . The Native American monitor shall be selected by the project Archaeologist in coordination with the Juaneiio Band of Mission Indians Acjachemen Nation. The Native American monitor shall be present at the pre-grading conference to establish procedures for tribal cultural resource surveillance. Those procedures shall include provisions for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit sampling, identification, and evaluation of resources deemed by the Native American monitor to be tribal cultural resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074. These procedures shall be reviewed and approved by the City of San Juan Capistrano Community Department Director, or designee, prior to commencement of any surface disturbance on the project site . 4.19 Uti l it i es/~ervie,e S't'litem The proposed project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to Utiliti es/Service Systems . No m itiga tio n would be re q ui red. 4.20 Wildfir e The proposed project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to wildfire. No m itigatio n would be req uired. 6.0 REFERENCES California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2019. State Scenic Highway Mapping System. Available at: http ://www.dot.ca .gov/hg/LandArch/16 livability/scen ic highways/. Accessed on March 1, 2019. California Department of Conservation (CDC). 2018. Orange County Important Farmland 2016 Map. Available at: https://www.conse rvation.ca.gov/dlrp/fmmp/Pages/Orange.aspx . Accessed on March 4, 2019 . California Department of Conservation (CDC). 2004. Agricultural Preserves 2004: Williamson Act Parcels . Orange County, California. Available at: https://www.conservat ion .ca .gov/dlrp/wa/Pages/stats reports .aspx . Accessed on March 4, 2019. City of San Juan Capistrano. 2017. Council Policy 601. Available at: http ://sanjuancapistrano.org/Portals/0/Councl1Policy601 1.pdf. Accessed on March 4, 2019 . City of San Juan Capistrano. 1999a. San Juan Capistrano General Plan: Program Environmental Impact Report Volume 1. December 1999. City of San Juan Capistrano. 1999b. General Plan Cogstone. (2011). Cultural Resources Assessment for the San Juan Capistrano Historic Town Center Master Plan Area. August 2011. Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). 2019. Hazardous Waste Substances List (Cortese List). Available at : http :ljwww.dtsc .ca.gov/SiteC leanup/Cortese List .cfm . Accessed on March 5, 2019. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2009. National Flood Insurance Program: Flood Insurance Rate Map 06059c0443J. Map Revised December 3, 2009. Federal Transit Administration (FTA). 2006 . Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment. NMG Geotechnical, Inc. (NMG). (2019). Geotechnical Exploration and Design for the Verdugo Street Beautification Project, City of San Juan Capistrano, California. January 31, 2019 . Orange County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC). 2008. Airport Land Use Commission Airport Environs Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport. Amended April 17, 2008. Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA). 2019. Website. Available at: https://www.oda .org/. Accessed on March 5, 2019 . QC Waste and Recycling. 2019. Active Landfills. Available at: http://www.oclandfills .com/contact/landfllls . Accessed on March 5, 2019. Pirzadeh & Associates. 2019. City of San Juan Capistrano Verdugo Street Beautification Project (CIP 14106) Traffic Impact Analysis. February 22, 2019 . State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). 2019. Geotracker Database. Available at: http ://geotracker. waterboa rd s.ca.gov/map/?CM D=runreport&myaddress=san +juan +capist r ano . Accessed on March 5, 2019. ATT AC HM ENT 2 , Page 113 of 293 APPENDICES ATTACHMENT 2, Page 114 of 293 APPENDIX A: CUMULATIVE PROJECT LISTS ATT AC HM ENT 2, Page 115 of 293 No. Proiect Name Location 1 San Juan Hills West of La Pata Hiah School Avenue. 2 J. Serra North and south of J. Catholic High Serra Road west of 1-5. School 3 T16634 West of La Pata Whispering Hills Avenue and north of Prima Deshecha Canada Landfill. 4 Pacifica San East of 1-5 extending Juan from McCracken Hill south to Camino Las Ram bias . 5 24-Hour Fitness south side of Calle Arroyo west of Rancho Viejo Road. 6 Plaza Banderas Northeast corner of El Camino Real & State Route-7 4 (Ortega Highwav\. 7 Kimpton Hotel Southeast corner of Camino Capistrano and Forster 8 Distrito La North and south sides Novia-San Juan of La Novia Avenue Meadows east of Valle Road. 9 Church of Latter North side of Vista Day Saints Montana west of La Pata Ave. 10 The River Street North of Del Obispo on Project Paseo Adelanto throuah to Los Rios 11 The Farm on Vermeleun property - Del Obisoo 32382 Del Obisoo 12 Tirador Near term in us of Calle Residential Arrovo "CUMULATIVE PROJECTS" LIST CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO Revised : November 2018 Land Use GSF/No. DU public high school 2,200 stu . n/a private high school 2,000 stu . n/a residential n.a . 155 SFD SF estate n.a . 416 du SF detached n.a . MF multi-family n.a. health club 38,000 gsf n .a . Hotel and restaurant 124 rooms: n .a. 14,500 gsf Restaurant: 3,898 asf Hotel and restaurant 102 rooms n.a. 3,500 gsf commercial 75,100 gsf 90 SFA office 16,000 gsf 50 MFA equestrian 500 horses 93 SFD residential church 16 ,558 gsf n .a . commercial 57,600 sf Residential and 40,000 sf 180 du commercial Townhomes and n.a. 136 du detached sfr's Tr afflc Status report 92% occupied yes-EIR 2,021 students 52% occupied yes-EIR 1,050 students Under construction. yes-EIR 140 D.U. occupied Under construction . yes-EIR 123 D.U. occupied Under Construction yes-EIR Addendum Under Construction Yes-EIR Approved; Pending Yes- litigation; Demo MND comoleted Addendum Approved yes-EIR Approved Yes -MND Under Review TBD Under Review TBD Under Review TBD ATIACHMENT2, Page 116of293 Traffic No. Proiect Name Location Land Use GSF/No. DU Status report 13 Chick-fil-a walk-31872 Del Obispo Walk-up and drive-2 ,90 5 s.f. n.a. Under Review TBD up and drive Street through restaurant retail through restaurant 14 Starbucks Cafe 32291 Camino Drive-through coffee 2,200 s.f. n.a . Under Review TBD with a drive Capistrano shop through 15 Mountain View 32382 Del Obispo Church 17 ,000 n.a . Approved Yes-MND Church Street 16 Ganahl lumber Northside of Stonehill Restaurants TBD n.a . ENA approved by CC TBD Drive between San lumber store with Project Under Review Juan Creek and the retail & 63,000 gsf railroad R.O.W. storage 57,000 gsf Self-storage TBD Vehicle storage 600 spaces 17 Downtown Southeast corner of theatre 18,828 gsf n.a. ENA approved by CC TBD Playhouse Ortega Highway and El Commercial 31,485 gsf Camino Real office 3.268 gsf 18 Mission Grill 31721 Camino Restaurant 4,750 gsf n.a. ENA approved by CC TBD Capistrano Retail 4,750 gsf office 7 ,500 QSf A TI ACHMENT 2, Page 117 of 293 APPENDIX B: PROJECT CONCEPT PLAN A TI AC HM ENT 2, Page 118 of 293 UGUICV lH!Alll!\ ECORI' Conoullln g,-1!.!£, t "''Jil:""i \IL fJI{_ loJ\o~.'i. I A\ I' ........... ORT ORTEGA HWY I I --- Figure 2. Project Concept Plan 2018-246 Verdugo Street Beautificab'on Pro;ect ATTACHMENT 2, Page 119 of293 APPENDIX C: CULTURAL RECORDS SEARCH RESULT ATTACHMENT 2, Page 120 of 293 Verdugo Street Beautification Project Cultural Background The project area was part of territory occupied by the Juaneno or Acjachemen Native American group when the Spanish arrived in A.O. 1769. The Juaneno lived in villages of up to 250 people and were located near permanent water sources and a variety of food resources. The village was the center of a territory from which resources were gathered. Work parties left the village to hunt, fish, and gather plant foods. The village of Acjachemen was located near the present location of Mission San Juan Capistrano and is likely represented by archaeological site ORA- 1190. Mission San Juan Capistrano was founded on November 1, 1776 for the purpose of Christianizing the indigenous peoples living between the coast and the Santa Ana Mountains. The Mission was established in its present location in October 1778. The growth of the settlement of San Juan Capistrano was concentrated primarily in the immediate vicinity of the Mission during the early years. The success of the San Juan Capistrano Mission is revealed in records of 1796 that count nearly one thousand Native American converts living in or near the Mission compound and working the various farming, herding, candle and soap making, iron smelting, and weaving and tanning operations. An increasing population led to the building of adobe homes for the native and intermarried families with ties to the Mission beginning in 1794. In 1807, an additional 34 adobe houses were built or remodeled. Mexico gained independence from Spain in 1821, and along with this independence came the secularization of the missions and emancipation of Native Americans from control by the mission friars in 1826. Some of the former mission land was redistributed to the Native Americans as a Native American pueblo or town. However, in 1841 the Native American pueblo of San Juan Capistrano was dissolved by the Mexican government, and a new town was organized as a municipal government. Both Native Americans and non-Native Americans received town lots. This was the first time that non-Native Americans could own land in San Juan Capistrano. The Mission had been sold by the Mexican government to John Forster, a wealthy land owner. After Alta California became part of the United States in 1848, the U.S. government decided in 1855 that ownership of the mission should be restored to the Catholic Church, which occurred in 1865 when a patent (federal deed) for the Mission was issued to the Catholic Church. In 1875, the township of San Juan Capistrano was surveyed, streets were laid out, and blocks and lots were recorded on a plat map. In 1877 the town had a schoolhouse, a telegraph office, a post office, two stores, a hotel, four saloons, and 40 to 50, mostly adobe, houses. In 1887, the coastal railroad, the California Southern Railroad, which later became part of the Santa Fe Railroad, was completed from Los Angeles to San Diego via San Juan Capistrano, fueling a land boom which brought additional residents to San Juan Capistrano. The late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries were a period of stability for San Jan Capistrano. The early years of the twentieth century saw the community become a tight knit group of farm families and merchants, relatively unaffected by the explosion of development to the north and south. The town, instead, developed into an agricultural center for the surrounding walnut and orange orchards, cattle and sheep ranches, and wheat fields. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 121of293 The 1-5 freeway was constructed through San Juan Capistrano between 1965 and 1968. As a result of the freeway interchange construction, Ortega Highway was re-aligned to its present route. Del Obispo Street was constructed along its present alignment by 1970. Development pressures in the early 1970s resulted in the creation of a new general plan in 1974 which preserved historic resources and open space, limited development density, and provided for ridgeline preservation. Historical information is from Hallan (1975). Records Search Results A records search was performed on January 31, 2018 at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) at California State University, Fullerton to identify previously recorded cultural resources within the APE and within a one-eighth-mile radius around the APE. In addition to site records and reports on file at the SCCIC, the California Historic Property Data File (HPDF) for Orange County (OHP 2012) was consulted for San Juan Capistrano. The HPDF provides information about resources determined eligible for, or listed on, the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) and the California Register of Historical Resources. It also provides information on resources that are California Historical Landmarks and California Points of Historical Interest. The records search showed that a total of 20 cultural resources investigations have been conducted within the one-eighth-mile records search radius. The records search results show that 54 cultural resources have been previously recorded within the one-eighth-mile records search radius, including 14 archaeological sites, 9 isolated artifacts, and 30 buildings and structures. The archaeological sites include: • Prehistoric archaeological material (mostly manos and metates) in a field west of Los Rios Street (CA-ORA-248H) • Archaeological material associated with the mission and the adjacent site of the JuaneFio village of Agachemem (CA-ORA-600H, CA-ORA-1190) • Prehistoric and historic material associated with the Blas Aguilar Adobe (CA-ORA-834H) • Prehistoric and historic material associated with the Verdugo Adobe (CA-0RA-1247H) • Historical archaeological material behind a commercial property near the intersection of Ortega Highway and Camino Capistrano (CA-ORA-1154H) • Historical archaeological material associated with the Richard Egan house (CA-ORA- 1173H) • Ceramics associated with the mission orchard wall (CA-ORA-1215H) • Prehistoric and historic material associated with the Valenzuela Adobe (CA-ORA-1247H) ATTACHMENT 2, Page 122 of 293 • Stone wall foundation (CA-ORA-1302H) • Prehistoric and historic material associated with the Miguel Yorba Adobe (CA-ORA- 1325H) • Historical archaeological material associated with the Otis Rodman house (CA-ORA- 1363H) • Prehistoric and historic material in the Los Rios Street area (CA-ORA-1708H) • Prehistoric and historic material associated with Troubleman's Cottage (Los Rios Street area) (P30-001718) • Historical archaeological material found in a trench in Historic Town Center Park (P30- 100470) None of the previously recorded resources on file at the SCCIC are in or adjacent to Verdugo Street. In addition to the previously recorded buildings and structures from the records search, the HPDF lists 86 buildings, structures, and streets in San Juan Capistrano. Mission San Juan Capistrano, the Roger Y. Williams House, the Domingo Yorba Adobe, the Esslinger Building, the Carl Stroschein House, the Blas Aguilar Adobe, the Della Ramos House, the Greystone Villa, the Miguel Parra Adobe, the Frank A. Forster House, and the Harrison House are individually listed on the National Register of Historic Places. In addition, there are numerous buildings in the Los Rios Street Historic District. None of these National Register listed buildings are in or adjacent to Verdugo Street. The Combs House is listed in the HPDF with an address of 26720 Verdugo Road. If this refers to Verdugo Street, the address indicates the house was on the south side of Verdugo Street where the Regency Theatre is now located. The Combs House was likely demolished in order to build the theatre. Verdugo Street is shown on the original 1875 town plat of San Juan Capistrano, but is labeled as Garden Street. It is also shown as Garden Street on a 1914 town map. The records search results show that the project area has a high potential for subsurface prehistoric and historic period archaeological material. The City of San Juan Capistrano's guidance for Archaeologists and Cultural Resource Consultants states that "development projects, landscape improvements and new infrastructure in culturally sensitive areas ranging from utility and retaining wall trenching to major new commercial or residential developments are required to include archaeological, paleontological and/or Native American monitoring during grading and construction" (City of San Juan Capistrano 2017a). As noted above, the City of San Juan Capistrano requires monitoring for development projects in in culturally sensitive areas. For this project monitoring of ground-disturbing activities should be conducted by an archaeological monitor under the supervision of an Orange County Certified ATTACHMENT 2, Page 123 of 293 Archaeologist and by a Native American monitor from one of the Juanefio groups recognized by the NAHC. A monitoring plan should be prepared by the Archaeologist and implemented upon approval by the City. Monitoring will be conducted in accord with City of San Juan Capistrano's Council Policy 601 on historic, archaeological, and paleontological resource management (City of San Juan Capistrano 2017b). Any archaeological material found during monitoring should be evaluated by the archaeologist using California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) eligibility criteria. If eligible, and therefore a Historical Resource as defined by CEQA, mitigation will be necessary. If human remains of any kind are found during construction, the requirements of CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.S(e) and AB 2641 shall be followed. According to these requirements, all construction activities must cease immediately and the Orange County Coroner and a qualified archaeologist must be notified. The Coroner will examine the remains and determine the next appropriate action based on his or her findings. If the coroner determines the remains to be of Native American origin, he or she will notify the NAHC. The NAHC will then identify the most likely descendants (MLD) to be consulted regarding treatment and/or reburial of the remains. If an MLD cannot be identified, or the MLD fails to make a recommendation regarding the treatment of the remains within 48 hours alter gaining access to them, the Native American human remains and associated grave goods shall be buried with appropriate dignity on the property in a location not subject to further subsurface disturbance. References Ci ted City of San Juan Capistrano 2017a Archaeologists and Cultural Resource Consultants. Available online at http://sanjuancapistrano.org/Departments/Development-Services/Planning- Zoning/Historic-Preservation/ Archaeologists-and-Cultural-Resource-Consultants 2017b Council Policy 601. Available online at http ://sanjuancapistrano.org/Portals/0/Counci1Policy601_1. pdf Hallan, Pamela 1975 Dos Cientos Afios en San Juan Capistrano. Lehman Publishing Company and Walker Color Graphics, Irvine . ATTACHMENT 2 , Page 124 of 293 APPENDIX D: GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND DESIGN STUDY ATTACHMENT 2, Page 125 of 293 To: Attention: January 31, 2019 A<lam Streeter Civil Engineers 16755 Von Karman Ave., Suite 150 Irvine, California 92606 Mr. Khoon Tan Project No. 18165-01 Subject: Geotechnical Exploration and Design for the Verdugo Street Beautification Project, City of San Juan Capistrano, California. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND In accordance with your request, NMG Geotechnical, Inc. (NMG) has performed a site specific geotechnical study for the proposed Verdugo Street beautification project in the city of San Juan Capistrano. The proposed improvements are based on the preliminary conceptual exhibits prepared by the project civil engineer, Adams Streeter Civil Engineers (ASCE). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the existing geotechnical conditions in light of the proposed improvements in order to provide geotechnical recommendations for design, earthwork and construction. The subsurface exploration for this study was conducted on January 11, 2019 and consisted of three hollow-stem auger borings (Boring H-1 through H-3) that were excavated, sampled and visually logged to depths of 3 to 16.5 feet deep below ground surface (bgs) along Verdugo Street and Camino Capistrano. NMG also documented the existing structural pavement section at the boring locations and performed laboratory testing on selected soil samples to evaluate the engineering properties of the onsite soils. Additional geotechnical information for the areas was collected from our review of the documents referenced in Appendix A. This report summarizes our geotechnical findings and presents our conclusions and recommendations. This report includes the geotechnical boring logs in Appendix B and laboratory test results in Appendix C. The attached figures depict the subject site and location of borings performed for this study. ATTACHMENTS Figure 1 -Site Location Map-Rear of Text Figure 2 -Geotechnical and Boring Location Map-Rear of Text Appendix A -References Appendix B -Geotechnical Boring Logs Appendix C -Laboratory Test Results ATTACHMENT 2, Page 126 of 293 SITE LOCATION, EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PRIOR STUDIES The subject site is located in the city of San Juan Capistrano near the San Juan Capistrano Metrolink/Amtrak train depot, and includes the entire length (approximately 300 linear feet) of Verdugo Street from the intersection at Camino Capistrano to the cul-de-sac (Figure 1 ). To the west of the site is the historic Los Rios district, which lies within the original stream bed of Arroyo Trabuco. Based on review of historic aerial photographs, Arroyo Trabuco was channelized further west of the subject site between 1952 and 1963. The existing paved street has commercial businesses and concrete sidewalks on both sides, and the street terminates at the train depot and a parking structure. There are numerous existing utilities within the street and sidewalk that include domestic water, gas, sewer, storm drain, electrical services, AT&T and Cox Communications, and traffic control services. The existing streetscape includes mostly concrete and paver sidewalks with some trees and plants. A prior geotechnical investigation for a nearby development was provided by representatives of the City of San Juan Capistrano for our review. The study was performed by Salem Engineering Group, Inc. (Salem) for a site located just north of Verdugo Street at 31721 Camino Capistrano and included drilling of five hollow-stem auger borings and laboratory testing. The collected data was provided in a draft report (Salem, 2018). PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS The proposed street improvements are intended to beautify and provide a more pedestrian- friendly street corridor for visitors. Based on the exhibits and the project information provided to date, the proposed improvements will include the following: • Reducing the overall width of the roadway; • Widen the sidewalk and add rolled curbs; • Add bulb-outs at the intersection with Camino Capistrano; • Provide stamped concrete and decorative pavers; • Modifications to existing storm drain catch basins; • Landscaping and irrigation; • Enhanced lighting and seat walls; and • Install ADA ramps and improvements. In lieu of extending the existing storm drain line, the site drainage improvements will include PVC pipes on both sides of Verdugo (behind the sidewalk) to capture both the roof drains and street drainage. FIELD INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING NMG's subsurface exploration was performed on January 11, 2019, and included the excavation of three hollow-stem auger borings (H-1 through H-3) along Verdugo Street and Camino Capistrano. The approximate boring locations relative to the existing street improvements are shown on Figure 2. The borings were drilled in the roadway pavement and extended to depths of ATTACHMENT 2, Page 127 of 293 approximately 3 to 16.5 feet bgs. Boring H-2 encountered refusal at 4 feet bgs due to the presence of abundant and/or oversized cobbles. The soils encountered in the borings consisted of artificial fill and older alluvium. The borings were geotechnically logged and soil samples were obtained at selected intervals. We also measured the existing street pavement section exposed in the borings. The borings were backfilled with cuttings, tamped, then capped with cold patch asphalt. The geotechnical boring logs, including the in-situ moisture content and dry density, are included in Appendix B. Soil sampling in the borings was performed using the modified California ring sampler. Ring samples were obtained from the exploratory borings with a 2.5-inch inside-diameter, split-barrel sampler. The sampler was driven with a 140-pound automatic trip hammer, free-falling 30 inches. Representative bulk samples of onsite soils were collected from the hollow-stem cuttings from various depths and were used for additional soil identification purposes and laboratory testing. We used the sampling to assess the soil beneath the site, as well as to obtain a measure of resistance of the soil to penetration (recorded as blows-per-foot on the geotechnical boring logs). LABORATORY TESTING Laboratory testing was performed on representative samples of onsite soils collected during our field exploration to characterize their engineering properties. Laboratory tests performed on selected relatively undisturbed and bulk soil samples included: • Moisture content and dry density; • Atterberg Limits; • Grain-size distribution; • Maximum dry density and optimum moisture content; • Expansion Index; • Shear Strength; • Soluble sulfate content; and • R-Value. Laboratory tests were conducted in general conformance with applicable American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standard test methods. Laboratory test results for this investigation are provided in Appendix C. In-situ moisture content and dry density data are included on the geotechnical boring logs (Appendix B). SUMMARY OF GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS The site lies within the Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province and is underlain by compacted fill materials and Quaternary-age older alluvium deposits (Morton, et. al., 1974). The site is located along the banks of Arroyo Trabuco and is underlain by artificial fill material (Map Symbol: Afu) that likely was placed during construction of the streets and/or backfilling of utilities. The undocumented artificial fill generally consists of clays and clayey sands with scattered construction debris (brick and tile). The artificial fill is underlain by older alluvium ATTACHMENT 2, Page 128 of 293 (Map Symbol: Qalo) which consists of interlayered clays and clayey sands with gravel and cobbles. Boring H-2 was terminated at 4 feet due to the presence of cobbles. It should be noted that the borings performed by Salem extended to a maximum depth of 18 feet bgs and all five borings encountered refusal due to gravel and cobbles (Salem, 2018). Within the parking lot to the north of Verdugo Street, a slope was observed that had abundant rounded cobbles within the clayey and sandy soil matrix. Mapping by the State indicates that the site is within a zone of liquefaction potential (CDMG, 200lb). The site is not located in an Alquist-Priolo Fault Rupture Hazard Zone (Hart and Bryant, 2007) and no evidence of active faulting was observed during this exploration. Also, based on mapping by the State (Jennings, 2010), there are no active faults mapped at the site. NMG's laboratory testing was conducted in accordance with applicable ASTM standards. The laboratory test results and engineering properties are summarized below and included in Appendix C. The in-situ moisture of the artificial fill samples ranged from 6.0 to 7.8 percent and had a dry density of 110.9 pounds per cubic foot (pct). The alluvial soils ranged from 15.8 to 20.2 percent and the dry densities ranged from 103.3 to 112.6 pcf. The maximum dry density test result indicates the upper fill soils have a maximum dry density of 125.0 pcf, with an optimum moisture content of 9 .5 percent. The fines content for this fill sample was 41 percent that corresponds to a USCS classification of SC (Sandy Clay). The Liquid Limit test results for two samples were 26 to 35 percent and the Plasticity Index test results were 7 to 17 percent. Direct shear testing was conducted on one relatively undisturbed ring sample in order to evaluate the strength properties of the on site soil in the upper 10 feet. The tested materials had an ultimate angle of internal friction of 23 degrees with cohesion of 590 psf. The peak value for the friction angle was 23 degrees with cohesion of 810 psf. A near-surface soil sample was collected and test results indicate "Very Low" expansion potential with an expansion index of 12. The soluble sulfate content test results indicate negligible ("SO") exposure levels per Table 4.2.1 of ACI-318. R-value testing was conducted on two samples, indicating R-values of 13 and 28. It should be noted that testing performed by Salem of similar earth units indicated "Low" to "Medium" expansion potential, with expansion indices ranging from 33 to 85 (Salem, 2018). GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS Groundwater and/or seepage was not encountered during our subsurface investigation to depths of 16.5 feet bgs within the subject site. During exploration of the adjacent site to the north, groundwater was not encountered to depths of 18 feet bgs. According to nearby boring logs and well data available, groundwater may range from 20 to 40 feet below ground surface; however, these sites are located east of the project site (Geotracker, 2017). Based on mapping by the State (CDMG, 2001 a), historic high groundwater is shown at approximately 5 feet bgs, which is associated with the Arroyo Trabuco flood plain. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 129 of 293 EXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION The existing pavement section was measured in all three borings excavated during our subsurface exploration. In Verdugo Street (Borings H-1 and H-2), the asphaltic concrete (AC) ranged frnm-5.5-to 6-inches thiek-overlying-6 to 7-inches of-aggregate-base (AB). Within Camino Capistrano (Boring H-3), the existing pavement section consisted of 3 inches of AC overlying 6 inches of concrete. The boring locations are shown on Figure 2. The extent of the concrete pavement within Camino Capistrano is not known, but may be prevalent. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 130 of 293 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1. General Conclusions The proposed street improvements are considered feasible from a geotechnical standpoint provided the following recommendations are implemented during design and construction. Our recommendations are considered minimum and may be superseded by more stringent requirements of the city of San Juan Capistrano or others. 2. Concrete Pavers We understand concrete pavers are to be used for both vehicular and pedestrian traffic. A preliminary exhibit provided by ASCE depicts two types of decorative concrete pavers for the project (Paver A and Paver B). The following paver thickness and the recommended underlying concrete section or AB thickness should be implemented during construction: Sidewalks (Pedestrian Plaza Area (Pedestrian and EVA) Street (Vehicular Traffic) Traffic) (PAVERB) (PAVERB) (PAVER A) 60-millimeter-thick 80-millimeter-thick concrete paver 80-millimeter-thick concrete paver concrete paver (mortar set) (mortar set) (with approximately 1 inch of leveling sand) 0.35-foot of AB over 0.5-foot-thick PCC concrete slab. Mortar set on 0.7-foot thick PCC compacted subgrade. concrete slab over 0.35 of AB over compacted subgrade. (AL TERNA TE) (ALTERNATE) Approximately 1 inch of leveling Approximately I inch of leveling sand over I-foot of AB over sand over 2-feet of AB over compacted subgrade. compacted subgrade. A concrete band along the perimeter of the pavers should be provided for lateral restraint. The concrete band should, at minimum, be 12 inches deep and deepened to below the depth of disturbed soil, if adjacent to landscape/planter areas. The geotechnical consultant should confirm the concrete band is excavated into firm and competent soil. Prior to construction of the paver sections, the subgrade soils should be scarified to a minimum depth of 6 inches and recompacted in place to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction per ASTM Test Method Dl557. The subgrade for the pedestrian and plaza areas should be presaturated to a minimum of 1.2 times optimum moisture content and extend to a depth of 12 inches. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 131 of 293 3. Concrete Pavements and Hardscape Colored Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) is proposed for crosswalks along Verdugo and Camino Capistrano that will be subject to heavy vehicular traffic (TI = 8.5). Given the anticipated subgrade soils and design traffic, we recommend that the new PCC structural pavement of be a minimum of the 0.7 foot over 0.35 foot of AB (based on Caltrans Highway Design guidelines). The scores lines/control joints (1/.i of total thickness) in the concrete street pavement should have a maximum spacing of 8 feet. The subgrade soils for the PCC crosswalk pavement should be processed to have uniform soil and moisture content conditions. The subgrade should be firm and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction. The above recommendations should also be applied to curb and gutter. The concrete crosswalk on Camino Capistrano may encounter existing concrete that could be utilized and poured over. Sidewalks and other non-structural concrete areas should be a minimum of 4-inches thick over approved subgrade soils. The sidewalks should be provided with control joints with maximum spacing of control joints (1/.i of total thickness). Expansion joints should also be provided at a maximum spacing of 40 feet. If the concrete sidewalk will be subject to heavy loading from design features, we recommend a minimum of 4 inches AB layer beneath the sidewalk or a minimum 6-inch-thick concrete slab on compacted soil subgrade. Exterior concrete elements, including vehicular drives, curb and gutter, driveways, and sidewalks, are susceptible to lifting and cracking when constructed over expansive soils. With expansive soils, the impacts to flatwork/hardscape can be significant, generally requiring removal and replacement of the affected improvements. Please also note that reducing concrete problems is often a function of proper slab design, concrete mix design, placement, and curing/finishing practices. Adherence to guidelines of the American Concrete Institute (ACI) is recommended. Also, the amount of post-construction watering, or lack thereof, can have a very significant impact on the adjacent concrete tlatwork. For reducing the potential effects of expansive soils, we recommend a combination of presaturation of subgrade soils; reinforcement; moisture barriers/drains; and a sublayer of granular material. Though these types of measures may not completely eliminate adverse impacts, application of these measures can significantly reduce the impacts from post- construction expansion of soil. The degrees and combinations of these measures will depend upon: • The expansion potential of the subgrade soils; • The potential for moisture migration to the subgrade; • The feasibility of the measures (especially presaturation); and • The economics of these measures versus the benefits. These factors should be weighed by the project owner determining the measures to be applied on a project-by-project basis, subject to the requirements of the local building/grading department. Give the onsite soils have "Low" to "Medium" expansion potential the subgrade soils for the non- vehicular pavements should be presaturated to a minimum of 1.2 times optimum moisture content and extend to a depth of 12 inches. ATT AC HM ENT 2, Page 132 of 293 Additional measures such as thickened concrete edges/footings, subdrains and/or moisture barriers should be considered where planter or natural areas with irrigation are located adjacent to the concrete improvements. Reinforcement with WWF or steel reinforcement (No. 3 bar) may also be considered for additional strength. Design and maintenance of proper surface drainage away from pavements is also important. 4. Cement Type Based on laboratory testing, we anticipate soluble sulfates exposure in the onsite soils to be "negligible" and may be cla sified as "SO" per ab le 19.3.1.1 of ACI-318-14. The flat\ ork and sidewalk concrete are typically considered non-tructu ra l e lements. Concret e mix for these elements should be based on the "SO" soluble sulfate exposure class of Table 19.3.2.1 in A 1- 318-14. 5. Asphalt Concrete Pavements If needed, the recommended composite asphalt structural pavement section is presented below. The section is based on a design R-value of 15 and a traffic index (TI) of 8.5 as provided by the City of San Juan Capistrano. The pavement structu ral section was designed in accordance with the requirements of the Cal trans and County of Orange Highway Design Manual. Street Location Traffic Index Pavement Section 0.40' AC over 1.40' AB Verdugo/Camino Capistrano 8.5 0.50' AC over 1.20' AB AC =Asphalt Concrete, AB =Aggregate Base Based on our borings, the existing aggregate base layer for the pavement on Verdugo has significantly less AB than the design structural section above. Also, the existing pavement on Camino Capi trano (0.25-foot AC over 0.50 PCC) is also less than the design structural section (per Section 3). Street pavement shou ld be placed in accordance with the requirement of Sections 301 and 302 of the Standard Specification of Public Works Construction (the Greenbook). Prior to construction of pavement sections, the subgrade soils should be carified to a minimum depth of 6 inches, moisture-conditioned as needed, and recompacted in place to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction (per ASTM Dl557). Subgrade should be firm prior to AB placement. AB materials can be crushed aggregate base or crushed miscellaneous base in accordance with the Greenbook (Section 200-2). The materials should be free of any deleterious materials. Aggregate base materials should be placed in 6-to 8-inch-thick loose lifts, moisture-conditioned as necessary, and compacted to a minimum of 95 percent relative compaction (per ASTM Dl557). Asphalt concrete should also be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 95 percent. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 133 of 293 6. Excavations and Protection of Existing Utilities and Improvements Existing structures, improvements and utilities adjacent to the proposed street improvements that are to be protected in-place should be located and visually marked prior to demolition, excavation and construction operations. Excavation and construction activities above or below existing foundations, pipelines and adjacent to existing improvements should be performed with care and under the direction of the utility company and a City of San Juan Capistrano representative. Stockpiling of soils over and adjacent to i111provem nt or pipelines should not be allowed without prior acceptance by the owners. Excavations adjacent to foundation and improvements to be protected in-place or any utility easement should be performed with care so as not to destabilize the adjacent ground. Shoring or other construction measures may be required to protect existing utilities and improvements in-place. We recommend that all excavations be performed in accordance with the requirements set forth by the Greenbook, Section 306 and CAL/OSHA Excavation Safety Regulations (Construction Safety Orders, Sections 1504, 1539 through 1547, Title 8, California Code of Regulations). Excavations adjacent to existing utilities or structures to be protected in place may require special measures (i.e., providing a minimum setback distance, layback or temporary shoring) to reduce the potential for ground movement and other adverse impacts. The stability of trenches or temporary excavation adjacent to existing improvements and utilities should be monitored during construction. The geotechnical consultant should be notified of any unusual condition encountered during excavation. The majority of the soils at the site should be classified as Type C for CalOSHA trench excavation requirements, due to the potential for loose gravel/cobbles may be encountered and/or the presence of groundwater. The excavated soils should be suitable for use as trench backfill, with the exception of oversized rock (greater than 6-inches in the maximum dimension) that may be encountered. Backfill materials should be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction (per ASTM Dl557). Select granular backfill (i.e., clean sand with SE 30 or better), may be used in lieu of native soils, but should also be compacted/densified with water jetting and flooding. Trenches excavated next to structures and foundations also should be properly backfilled and compacted to provide full lateral support and reduce the settlement potential. 7. General Earthwork and Grading Standards Prior to placement of compacted fill (if any), the subgrade should be scarified, moisture- conditioned, and recompacted. Fill materials should be compacted to at least 90 percent of maximum dry density, as determined by ASTM Test Method Dl557. Fill materials should be placed in loose lifts no thicker than 8 inches. Materials should be moisture-conditioned to above optimum moisture content and processed, as necessary, to achieve uniform moisture content that is within moisture limits required to assure adequate bonding and compaction. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 134 of 293 8. Foundation Design A net allowable bearing capacity of 1,200 psf may be assumed for a 12-inch-wide footing embedded 12 inches below the lowest adjacent grade. The allowable bearing pressure may be increased by 200 psf for every additional foot of width and 500 for every additional foot of embedment up to a maximum of 3,000 psf. The allowable bearing pressure may be increased by one-third for wind and seismic loading. We recommend that strip and isolated footings have a minimum embedment depth of 24 inches. For lateral resistance against sliding, a friction coefficient of 0.3 may be used at the soil- foundation interface. A soil unit weight of 120 pcf may be assumed for onsite soils. For the street light or other pole foundations, an allowable side skin friction of 250 psf and a passive lateral earth pressure (equivalent fluid pressure) of 350 psf/ft may be used. 9. Groundwater Groundwater was not encountered during our subsurface investigation to a maximum depth of 16.5 feet, and local groundwater data indicates groundwater is generally deeper than 20 feet bgs. Groundwater is not anticipated to be encountered during the excavation of the proposed improvements. Historic high groundwater is shown at approximately 5 feet bgs. 10. Geotechnical Review of Future Plans Any revisions/changes in the current precise grading plan should be reviewed and accepted by the geotechnical consultant prior to grading and construction. 11. Geotechnical Observation and Testing The geotechnical consultant should perform geotechnical observation and testing during the following phases of grading and construction: • During precise grading; • During driveway, sidewalk, and curb and gutter subgrade preparation, prior to placement of concrete; • Upon completion of any foundation and excavation prior to placement of reinforcement or concrete; • During pavement section construction; • During placement of backfill for utility trenches; and • When any unusual soil conditions are encountered during construction subsequent to the issuance of this report. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 135 of 293 LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of our client, Adam Streeter Civil Engineers, within the specific scope of services requested by our client for the design and construction of the subject improvements. This report or its contents should not be used or relied upon for other projects or purposes or by other parties without the written consent of NMG. Our methodology for this study is based on local geotechnical standards of practice, care, and requirements of governing agencies. No warranty or guarantee, express or implied is given. The findings, conclusions, and recommendations are professional opm1ons based on interpretations and inferences made from geologic and engineering data from specific locations and depths, observed or collected at a given time. By nature, geologic conditions can be very different in between points, and can also change over time. Our conclusions and recommendations are subject to verification and/or modification with more exploration and/or during grading and construction when more subsurface conditions are exposed. NMG's expertise and scope of services did not include assessment of potential subsurface environmental contaminants or environmental health hazards. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact the office. We appreciate the opportunity to provide our services. Respectfully submitted, NMG GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Karlos Markouizos, RCE 50312 Principal Engineer ZKH/L Y/KGM/grd Distribution: (1) Addressee (E-Mail) Lynne Yost, CEG 2317 Principal Geologist ATTACHMENT 2, Page 136 of 293 9 VERDUGO STREET BEAUTIFICATION Project Number: 18165-01 By: KGM/LY ~ ~ VERDUGO STREET Project Name: ASCENerdugo Street ii5 § CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA Date: 1131119 Figure 1 NMG ~--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.....i ...... ~~~~!'!!!!!!"'!"""!!!~!"'!'!!! ...... '!!!!!""'!"""'!!!""'~~~ ..... ..,...........-!~- ATTACHMENT 2 , Page 137 of 293 I I i f I l o 1i Afu VERouaosTREET o e H-1-~---H 2--1 ° T.D.1 6.5' ~ .T .~.4'!Refusa1) ~ ;~----~~~! II ·~~J Oa lo ~1 .S' LEGEND EARTH UNITS -CIRCLED WHERE BURIED Afu Qalo ARTIFICIAL FILL, UNDOCUMENTED OlDER ALLUVIUM OTHER SYMBOLS -LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE I GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) ·H-3 HOLLOW-STEM AUGER BORING, SHOWING TOTAL DEPTH 1 inch .,, .40 fl DRAFT T.0 .3' AND DEPTH TO EARTH UNITS (3 TOTAL ) Oalo@ 1.5' GEOTECHNICAL AND BORING LOCATION MAP Project No :18165-01 By: KGMIL y FIGURE 2 NMG 1 Bose Map: Adams Streeter Civil Englnoors VERDUGO STREET BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT Project Name:ASCENerdugo Street CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, COUNTY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA Date:113112019 ATTAC HME ~:li'BSO ' 38 GL'1l9a ""41. 1 ... APPENDIX A ATTACHMENT 2, Page 139of293 APPENDIX A REFERENCES California Division of Mines and Geology, 200la, Seismic Hazard Zone Report For The San Juan Capistrano 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, Orange County California, SHZR 053. California Division of Mines and Geology, 2001 b, Seismic Hazard Zones Map, San Juan Capistrano 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, Official Map released December 21, 2001. GeoTracker, 2017, California Environmental Protection Agency, Water Resources Control Board, 2017, Geotracker Groundwater Data Program, website address: htt p:// ge otrac ker. wa terb oards.ca . gov /defa u It.a p# Hart, E. W. and Bryant, W.A., 2007, Fault Rupture Hazard Zones in California, Alquist Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act with Index to Earthquake Fault Zones Maps, Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, Special Publication 42, Interim Revision 2007. Jennings, Charles W. and Bryant W.A., 2010, Fault Activity Map of California, Department of Conservation, California Geological Survey, Geologic Data Map No. 6. Morton, P.K., Edgington, W.J., Fife, D.L., 1974, Geologic Map of the 7.5-Minute San Juan Capistrano Quadrangle, Orange County, California, Special Report 112, Plate I. Salem Engineering Group, Inc., 2018, Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Investigation, Proposed Development 31721 Camino Capistrano, APNS 121-141-07, 08, 09, 25, 26, and 27, San Juan Capistrano, California, Project No. 3-217-1360, DRAFT report dated January 26, 2018. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 140 of 293 APPENDIX B ATTACHMENT 2, Page 141of293 SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOLS TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS CLEAN GRAVELS 1>'-'U GW WELL-GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND MIXTIJRES, umE olJO • GRAVEL AND ri c--OR NO FINES GRAVELLY SOILS (LITTLE OR NO FINES) ~--POORLY GRADED GRAVELS , GRAVEL -SAND MIXTURES, ·~· . GP a 41 LITilE OR NO FINES MORE THAN 50% OF GRAVELS WITH :~ ,., GM COARSE COARSE FRACTION FINES !04 .. SIL TY GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND-SILT MIXTI.JRES GRAINED SOILS RETAINED ON NO. 4 (APPRECIABLE ~~~ SIEVE AMOUNT OF FINES) GC CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL -SAND-CLAY MIXTIJRES MORE THAN 50% OF SW WELL-GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SANDS, LITilE OR NO MATERIAL IS SAND AND CLEAN SANDS FINES ..... LARGER THAN NO. SANDY SOILS (LITTLE OR NO FINES) ... · . .. . . . · POORLY GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SANDS, LITTLE OR NO 200 SIEVE SIZE ·· .. : .. :· ..... ·.:· SP FINES MORE THAN 50% OF ... COARSE FRACTION SANDS WITH .. ·' SM . ·.·. ... SIL TY SANDS , SAND -SILT MIXTIJRES PASSING NO. 4 SIEVE FINES .... .. (APPRECIABLE 7/0. SC CLAYEY SANDS, SAND -CLAY MIXTIJRES AMOUNT OF FINES) I 11 INORGANIC SIL TS AND VERY FINE SANDS, ROCK FLOUR, SIL T'I ML OR CLAYEY FINE SANDS OR CLAYEY SIL TS WITH SLIGHT PLASTICITY SIL TS AND CLAYS LIQUID LIMIT LESS • INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM PLASTICITY, FINE GRAINED THAN 50 CL GRAVELLY CLAYS, SANDY CLAYS, SIL TY CLAYS, LEAN CLAYS SOILS ---CRGANIC SIL TS AND ORGANIC SIL TY CLAYS OF LOW --OL ---PLASTICITY -- MORE THAN 50% OF I I MH INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR DIATOMACEOUS RNE MATERIAL IS SANDY OR SIL TY SOILS, ELASTIC SIL TS SMALLER THAN NO. SIL TS AND CLAYS LIQUID LIMIT ~ 200 SIEVE SIZE GREATER THAN 50 CH INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY /f/// OH CRGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO HIGH PLASTICITY, ORGANIC fffff, SILTS HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS m PT PEAT, HUMUS, SWAMP SOILS WITH HIGH ORGANIC CONTENTS NOTE: Dual symbols are used to indicate gravels or sand with 5-12% fines and soils with fines classifying as CL-ML. Symbols separated by a slash indicate borderline soil classifications. Sampler and Symbol Descriptions I Modified California sample (D-#) ~ Standard Penetration Test (S-#) III Undisturfbed pushed tube sample (U-#) 1111 Large bulk sample (B-#) [81 Small bulk sample (b-#) '¥. Approximate depth of groundwater Laboratorv and Fjeld Test P.bbreviatioas Atterberg limits Chemical Testing incl. Soluble Sulfate Consolidation test Direct shear test Expansion Index Note: Number of blOYIS required to advance driven sample 12 inches (or lenglh noted) is recorded. AL cc CN OS El GS MD Grain Size Analysis (Sieve, Hydro. and/or -No. 200) Compaction test RV Resistance Value (R-Value) SE Sand Equivalent UU Unconsolidated Shear Strength GENERA!.. NOTES 1 . Soil classifications are based on the Unified Soil System and include color, moisture, and relative density or consistency. Field descriptions have been modified to reflect results of laboratory tests where deemed appropriate. Bedrock descriptions are based on visual classification and lnclud rock type, moisture, color, grain size, strength, and weathering. 2. Descriptions on these boring logs apply only at the specific boring locations and at the time the borings were made. They are not warranted to be representative of subsurface conditions at other locations or times. iii NMG G otechnical lnc. KEY TO LOG OF BORING A.'>CE/Verdugo Street San Juan Capistrano, California PROJECT NO. 18165-01 nted: 211/19 Date(s) 1/11/19 Logg ed ZKH Drilled 8y Drilling 2R Drilling Drill Bil 10" Company Sizetrvoe H-1 Dri ll Rig CME 75 Hollow Stem Hammer 140 @ 30" drop Type Data Sheet 1of1 Sampli ng Melhod(s) Modified California, Bulk Approximate Groundwater Depth : No Groundwater Encountered. Total Dep th Drilled (ll) 16.5 Comments Approximate Ground Surface Elevation (fl) 105.0 msl g c: 0 ii > (I) w 100 -90 SAMPLES g £ a. Q) (I) a. 0 ~ 0 5- 10-1 Qi .a E :::J z B-1 D-1 D-2 D-3 Qi a. rJ> 3: -0 0 iii .e 6 24 14 w MATERIAL DESCRIPTION (..) If) :::> ~ Surface: 5.5" AC over 6" AB . ~ SCtCL >-Artlticl;i-Flli:"° G;iiTo;u;;;e"i\t;d(Atu) -------------- t% V, ~ @ 2 .5': Uppe r: Black silty clayey SAND/silty sandy CL AY , moist, µ/.' medium dense/medium stiff, roots up to 1/8" diameter , tra ce brick/tile .: ··:·: -5M-lf@lli!1!!D~·----------------------_ _J ·: · .. : Lower: Grayish brown silty fine SAND, damp, very loose to loose, roots · up to 1/8" diam eter, trace rounded gravel. CL Ol der Alluvium (Qalo) @ 5': Dark brown silty CLAY, very moist, very stiff, trace caliche stringers, trace roots up to 1 /8" diameter. ~ 13' e.... ..9; Q) -~ c: ~ .a Q) "iii rJ>-·-c: ~~ co ~(..) QQ 6.0 110.9 OTHER TESTS and REMARKS 8-1 @ 1'-5' GS, MD, AL, El .CC 20.2 103.3 DS -5M--@10::-0iive t>r~~silty~e~fine SAN"D-:-moist:loos;t; ~dium "de;;-s;,-15.9 101.1 Ds : : _: few pinh ole pores , micaceous , roots up to 1 /8 " diameter. •' .· ... . ·:: : . ·: '·: .. . .. . . ·' .. 1 5-1-~-4--+~-'·:.~:··:"-·'."-"l:-_s_M_/s_c-1--@_1_5~-:_D--a-rk_g_7_a;;-·s_h_b_-;_o--wn_-_s_iii-y1_ci_;;_ye_y_fi_~_e_s_AN_-D_-_· v_;_ry_-_m_Oi_;:_i _to_w_~_t-_. ----+--19 ___ 4 -1--1 -os_._4 -1---------~• 17 :·: . · medium dense, calich e nod ul es , trace pinhole pores, micaceous . . . f/'. 20- Notes : TD : 16.5 Feet. No Groundwater Encountered . Backfilled with Cuttings and Tamped . -Capped with A/C Cold Patch. 80 2:'i--'"----''---_._ _ _,_ __ .._ ________________________ ...._ _ _,_ __ ..__ ______ --t LOG OF BORING ASCE/Verdugo Street San Juan Capistrano, California PROJECT NO. 18165-01 --- , -.. -• -· -;;::;J- iii NMG ------ Date(s) Drilled 1/11/19 Logg ed By ZKH Drilling 2R Drilling Drill Bit 10" Company Siz effvp.e H-2 Drill Rig CME 75 Hollow Stem Hammer 140 @ 30" drop Type Data Sheet 1of1 Samp l ing Melhod(s) Modified California, Bulk Approximate Groundwater Depth : No Groundwater Encountered. Total Depth Drilled(li) 4.0 Comments '-; Q. (.!) g c: 0 ~ .!!1 w ci -110 I!! 0:: w ~ 0 y ~ "' § 100 rg o g ~ Q) 0 0 5 10- 15- 20- SAMPLES Q) c. ~ Qj .0 E :J z V) 3: .... 0 0 -o co- en MATERIAL DESCRIPTION (.) en ::::i ~ Surface: 6" AC over 7" AB. /:'. @ 1 ': Driller notes very hard drilling due to cobbles. App roximate Ground Surface ElevaUon ft ) B-1 0-1 ~1: sCicL:-A'rtifiCial Fi1[ lkidcicuiiie-;;t;d (A'fu) -------------- ~ @2.5': Dark brown claye y SAN D/sandy CLAY with fine to coarse 7 .8 71 () gra\iel, moist , very dense, gravel is mostly subangular, cobbles up to /) 5'-6' diameter and subrounded. Notes : TD : 4 Feet (Refusal). No Groundwater Encountered. Backnlled with Cuttings and Tamped. Capped with A/C Cold Patch . LOG OF BORING A.'>CE/Verdugo Street San Juan Capistrano, California PROJECT NO. 18165-01 - - - '' ,_ 1YI"-"' ' '-l -;::J- 111.0 msl OTHER TESTS and REMARKS B-1 @ 1'-2 .5' iiii NMG ---·- Date (s) 1/11/19 Logged ZKH Drilled By Drilling 2R Drilling Drill Bit 10" H-3 Compan y Size!T"vpe Drill Rig CME 75 Hollow Stem Hammer 140 @ 30" drop Sheet 1of1 Type Data Sampling Melhod(s) Modified California, Bulk Approximate Groundwater Depth : No Groundwater Encountered. Total Dllllth Drilled ( ) 3.0 9omments Approximate Ground Surface Elevation ft) 112.5 msl g SAMPLES O> ?ft .;=-Olli ER c g 0 u 0 Qi _J .e: TESTS ~ Qi 0. u ~-~ .c :.c Cl) MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ::Jc and > 0.. .c rn -Ql "iii Ql E ~-0. (..) rn-.!!1 Ql 0. !!! ·-c ~:ii REMARKS w 0 ~ ::J 00 en Oo z -o Cl ::l :2 (..) 00 a:i- A v ~ Surface: 3" AC over 6" CONCRETE . . ~ Cl Artlflc i al Fill , Undoc umented (Afu) 15.8 112.6 B-1 @ 1'-3' Al \'P2 1 ': Upper (Not in Sample): Dark brown sandy CLAY, moist, very stiff, f D-1 26 I CL trace brick/tile fraciments lift surfaces, mottled . 110 B-1 Older Alluvium (Qalo) Lower: Brown to reddish brown silly CLAY, very moist, very stiff, . ~nhole pores, caliche stringers, slightly mottled . I @ 1 .6': 2" diameter metal utility pipe. Marked by USA after drilling as T&Tt~ench . 5 ,... - Notes : TD: 3 Feet. No Groundwater Encountered . Backfilled wi t h Cuttings and Tamped . Capped with A/C Cold Patch. 10-- -100 15--- 20-... 90 2: LOG OF BORING ~ MCE/Verdugo Street San Juan Capistrano, California NMG PROJECT NO. 18165-01 --·-. ·-·-~ ~ -,. --- I -..-t L-•' I -, -o:1-l""T V ---v APPENDIX C ATTACHMENT2, Page 146 of293 ASCENerdugo Street APPENDIX San Juan Capistrano, California Project Number: 18165-01 SUMMARY OF SOIL LABORATORY DATA lloflng/Samplo Information .. ~!oval --•-r A\l f.!! ~g Direct Shear C01111Bctlan Fl•ld Fleld Field DogrM Anes aay Ultimate Peak ,....,...,m """""'" Soluble End llow -c.y Mel .... "' Contont ecn..nt uses c.y -~.;on R·Vllue ....... Rcmarltt Baring Sample De pth Deptll ElevatJ on Count Demlty Density Content Sat (Y ...... r;.paaa. LL Pl Groop ~on Frldlon ~ .. FrJdlon Density ~ ...... canunt No. No. (fHQ (feet) (loe1r (N) (pd) (pcf) ~ I'll #200) 2µ) r1.i (%) Symbol (pol) Anlll•A (pol) AnllloA (pcf) l'IQ (%bywl) H-1 S-1 1.0 5.0 104.0 41 26 7 SCICL 125.0 9.5 12 28 0.05 H-1 D-1 2 .5 102.5 6 117 .6 110.9 6 .0 31 .4 SCICL H-1 D-2 5.0 100.0 24 124.2 103.3 20.2 86.5 CL 590 23 810 23.0 H-1 D-3 10.0 95.0 14 124.1 107.1 15.9 74.7 SM 220 29 380 29.0 H-1 D-4 15.0 90.0 17 127.0 106.4 19.4 89.8 SM/SC H-2 S-1 1.0 2.5 110.0 SCICL H-2 D-1 2 .5 108.5 71 7.8 SCICL H-3 D-1 1.0 111 .5 26 130.4 112,6 15.8 86_1 CL H-3 S-1 1.0 3.0 11 1.5 35 17 CL 13 iii Sheet 1of1 NMG r.. Tn e .-·-·---·-- r,,. ... .,. ,.,.,,U, ., .. ,'111•1,. .. ....-_~..,...-~t...1Ll,.C::-r "'J IU: n11t!I J Symbol 0 Ill iii 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 7 4 o / L::::::: .... I/ 0 Boring Number H-1 H-3 i/ i/ ,,' .... " ,,," ;' ,.... ::~:;:IMI :::::::::::~ I 16 20 Sample Number B-1 B-1 NMG Geotechni al Inc. U LINE -:~ ALINE -:~ i/ ,,..,, / " / ,,' " i/ /r ~v ..... ,,~ " / i/ / / ,,· " / ~" i/ ,,' ,.CH or 0/ v .... I/ ,- / 16( orOL " i/ ,.! IZI / MH >rOH / v ML or OL 40 60 80 100 Depth (feet) 1.0-5.0 1.0 -3.0 LIQUID UIWT(%) Passing No.200 LL Pl uses Description Sieve(%) 41 26 7 SC/CL (Afu) Dark brown clayey SAND/sandy CLAY 35 17 CL (Afu/Qalo) Brown silty sandy CLAY PLASTICITY CHART ASCE/Verdugo Street San Juan Capistrano, California PROJECT NO. 18165-01 120 I 36 12 100 GRAVEL coarse fine U.S . STANDARD SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES 6 3 1-1/2 3/4 3/8 I II I I! ~ SAND SILT OR CLAY coarse medium fine I U.S. STANDARD SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 4 8 16 30 50 100 200 90 1+t-H-t-t--t--+~-H"!+l-t-1-+-t---H-~+H-++'•~ld--t--f-~+H++-Ht-+-+~-+tt.t++-t-+--t-~-++1f+++-i---+--l~--t ; '" 1: 80t+HH-t-+--t---+-~+++t :+-HH--+--+-~++++-Hf-+--+-~~_,..--t-t-++-+-t--i-t----ir----++++++-+-l~l----+++++++-lr--l----I : '\ 70 1++-++-1-+--+--+~--+ll-ttt-+++-~-li-~-+++++.;;.+-+--+~--++++~,,~N~~-+--+~--++l*:++-+-+--+-~-*il-++-l-li--+--l~--1 ~ \ ~ ~ 60 H+++-1-+--+--t-~-H+t-+-+--+-t---+-~-+++-1-t--t-t-t---t-~--t-t++++~·--+'~r-t~--t-+++++-+--+--+-~--tt--t++-+-11--t---l~--1 ~ \ : ~ ffi 50 1++-++-l-+--+--+~--+l-+H-+++-~-li-~-+++++*i;-+-+-+-~+H++-H+-+--+-->'\r-t+l*++-+-+--+-~-++-l-++-l-li--+--l~--I 0 a:: ~ 40 H+t-t-t-t--t--t-~-H~+-t--+-t---+-~-+++-H--t-t-t---t-~--t-t++++-+--t---t-~-tt-1t++-t-l-T--l~---t-t-H-r-t-+--+--+-~~ 1: 10H+t-t-1-+--+--t-~-H1-ttt-+++-~-1i-~-+++++-li-+-t-----i~--+++t++-1t--t---t-~-l+!~l'.-;-t-;-+--+-~-++-H-+-+-1t-+--lf----I t: 0 ......._....._ ........... _.___.__,.__..........,i..._._.._..• .......... _..~_..........._.........,.i......._ ......... •_,___..1........, ........ _._.'--'-__.'--'-1 __...._....11_._._.__.__,_~....._ ......... _..._._...___..____, 1,000 100 10 1 0.1 Symbol 0 iii Boring Number H-1 Sample Number B-1 NMG Geoteclmical Inc . Depth (feet) 1.0-5.0 PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Field Moisture LL (%) 26 Pl 7 Activity Pl/·21J PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION ASCE/Verdugo Street San Juan Capistrano, California PROJECT NO. 1816S-01 0 .01 0 .001 Passing . N 200 Passing Si:~e (%) 211 (%) uses 41 SC/CL ~ !,,) E: ~ 140 130 120 (ij 110 z w c ~ c 100 90 800 I\ \ I\ \ \ \ / '/ / Qv v / la" 5 Boring No. H-1 f\ \ Maximum Dry Density (pcf) 125.0 I\ '\ Optimum Moisture Content(%) 9.5 \ " G/S/F= 10 I 49 I 41 I\ \ '\ .. \ I'\ \ I\. '\ I\ I\. Zero Air Voids Curves 1-Q. I'\ \ r'\. ....... " Gs= 2.80 ~ '\ ' I'-~ Gs= 2.70 '\. ~ I\ '\ ' "" Gs= 2.60 "I\.\ ~ ~ ' ' '\ ......... K ' \ '\ ~ " " ~ '\ '\. "' "-\ ~ "' "' I\. "' I" '\ "" ""' ' !': !'... "" "!'-... "' '~ ""' "' ..... I\.' "" ", ' "" "'-. 1"'-... ' "-.. ""' .... "' I\. 10 15 20 25 MOISTURE CONTENT (%) Sample No. 8-1 Depth: 1.0 -5.0 ft Sample Description: (Afu) Dark brown clayey SAND uses: SC Liquid Limit: 26 Comments: 15578 ~ NMG Geote lmical. Inc . I Plasticity Index: 7 Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve: COMPACTION TEST RESULTS ASCENerdugo Street San Juan Capistrano, California PROJECT NO. 18165-01 41 ' ' 30 Compacted Compacted Final Volumetric Expa11sio11 Expa11sive Soluble S11/ja1e Sample Moisture Dry Density Moisture Swell !11dex 1 Class!ficatio11 2 Sulfate Exposure 3 (%) (pcO (%) (%) Value/Method (%) H-1 8-1 9.5 111.1 16.9 1.23 12 A Very Low 0 .05 so 1-5' Test Method: Notes: ASTMD4829 1. Expansion Index (EI) method of determination: [A] E.1. determined by adjusting water content to achieve a 50 ±I% degree of saturation HACH SF-1 (Turbidimetric) [BJ E.I. calculated based on measured saturation within the range of 40% and 60% 2 . ASTM 04829 (Classification of Expa11sive Soil) 3 . ACI-318-14 Table 19 .3 .1.1 (Requirement for Concrete Exposed to Sulfate-Comaining Solutio11s) Expansion Index Project No. 18165-01 ~ and Soluble Sulfate Project Name: ASCE I Verdugo Street Test Results NMG (FRMOO I Rev.5) ATTACHMENT 2, Page 151of293 5,000 5,000 4,000 4,000 i;:- Ill ~ ,,, 3,000 3,000 N = 1,000 psf ,,, w N = 2,000 psf ------It: I-.. .... ......... . .. ······· ........... ,,, N = 4,000 psf •················ ~ 2,000 2,000 v---------::c / / ----,,, ....... ---1,000 . ,. 1,000 !p 0 I 0 0 0.10 0.20 0.30 SHEAR DISPLACEMENT (in) 5,000 5,000 i;:-4,000 4,000 Ill ~ ::c I-3,000 3,000 C) z w ~I It: I-,,, 2,000 2,000 It: ~ ,. c( ~ w ::c __,,) ,,, 1,000 1,000 ~ 0 0 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 NORMAL STRESS (psf) Boring No. H-1 Sample No. D-2 Depth: 5.0 ft Sample Description: (Qalo) Dark brown CLAY uses: CL Liquid Limit: Plasticity Index: Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve: Final Moisture 105.2 Final Dry 26.9 Degree of 54 Content (%): Density (pcf): Saturation (%): Sample Type: Undisturbed Rate of Shear (in./min.): 0.005 SHEAR STRENGTH PARAMETERS Parameter Peake Ultimate o Cohesion (psf) 810 590 Friction Angle (degrees) 23.0 23 .0 DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS iiii ASCE/Verdugo Street San Juan Capistrano, California PROJECT NO. 18165-01 NMG Geotechnica l. Tnc. .6.TT /\f""Ut\llCl\IT '> .., ___ 1 J;') ,..~ r\l"'\'l -c Templale: NMDSWGRAPH; Pq ID : 18165-0 1-CONVERTEO.GPJ ; Pnnled: 2/1/19 5,000 5,000 4,000 4,000 C' UI ~ rn 3,000 3,000 N = 1 ,000 psf rn w N = 2,000 psf ------a:: ... ······ I-··········· ············ .......... N = 4,000 psf ................. rn a:: 2,000 2,000 < w ---:I: ---,... ___ ..., rn : " !-"' -----. .... 1,000 v 1,000 ) 0 0 0 0.10 0.20 0.30 SHEAR DISPLACEMENT (in) 5,000 5,000 C' 4 ,000 4 ,000 UI ~ :I: I-3,000 3,000 C) z w ~I a:: I-rn 2,000 2,000 a:: ~, < ~ w :I: rn 1,000 1,000 ~ v 0 0 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 NORMAL STRESS (psf) Boring No. H-1 Sample No. D-3 Depth: 10.0 ft Sample Description: (Qalo) Light brown silty SAND uses: SM Liquid Limit: Plasticity Index: Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve: Final Moisture 103.8 Final Dry 28.9 Degree of 58 Content (%): Density lDCf\: Saturation (%): Sample Type: Undisturbed Rate of Shear (in./min.): 0.005 SHEAR STRENGTH PARAMETERS Parameter Peak• Ultimate O Cohesion (psf) 380 220 Friction Angle (degrees) 29.0 29.0 DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS iii ~CE/Verdugo Street San Juan Capistrano, California PROJECT NO. 18165-01 NMG Geote chni cal T nc. /\TT J\f"'LJ ll ~t=l\.I T ') n,..,.,,.. 1 t:;.':). """ '1 0':). Template: NMDSWGRAPH; Prj ID : 1816S-01·CONVE RTED.GPJ; Printed : 2/1/1 9 R-VALUE TEST DATA CTM 301 I ASTM 02844 Project: ASCE/ Verdugo Boring Trench No: H-1 Field Description: Lab Description: Dark Brown silty SAND Specimen Number Mold Number Water Adjustment (g) Compactor Pressure (psi) Exudation Pressure (psi) Gross Weight (g) Mold Tare (a) Wet Weight (g) Sample Height (in) Initial Dial Reading Final Dial Reading Expansion (in x10-4 ) Stability(psi) at 2 ,000 lbs (160 psi) Turns Displacement R-Value Uncorrected R-Value Corrected Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Assumed Traffic Index G.E. by Stability G.E. by Expansion Gt Dish No . Weight of Moist Soil and Dish (g) Weight of Dry Soil and Dish (g) Water Loss (g) Weight of Dish (g) Dry Soil (g) Moisture Content(%) Project No: 18165-01 Sample No: B-1 1 2 1 2 +35 +20 250 350 265 352 3222 .3 3228.2 2095 .7 2114.7 1126.6 1113.5 2.49 2.48 0.0514 0.0415 0.0515 0.0427 1 12 58 I 124 42 I 92 3 .00 2.95 19 39 19 39 12 .5 11.4 121.9 122.2 4 .0 4.0 0 .83 0.62 0.03 0 .40 1.25 Moisture Content PP LL 270.3 286.7 245.8 262.6 24.5 24.1 49.4 50.3 196.4 212.3 12 .5 11.4 R-Value by Exudation = R-Value by Expansion = R-Value at Equilibrium= Date: 1/18/2019 Sample Depth: 1-5' 3 4 3 +10 350 579 3212.2 2099.4 1112.8 2.49 0.0417 0.0455 38 34 I 60 I 2 .67 61 61 10 .5 122 .5 4 .0 0.40 1.27 F 289.4 266.6 22 .8 50.4 2 16 .2 10.5 28 43 I 28 by Exudation I he data above is based upon processing and testing samples as received from the field . Test procedures in accordance with latest revisions to Department of Transportation, late of California, Materials & Research Test Method No. 301 and/or ASTM Standard D2844 emarks : A traffic index of 4 .0 was used for calculation purposes. el up by: BAJ Run by: BAJ/TG alculated by: TG Checked by: BAJ/TG Date Com pleted: · al, Inc . R-VALUE GRAPHICAL PRESENTATION Project: ASCE/ Verdugo Project No: 18165-01 Date: 1/18/2019 Boring Trench No: H-1 Sample No: B-1 Sample Depth: 1-5' Field Description : Lab Description: Dark Brown silty SAND R-Value vs. Exudation Pressure 80 I 70 I I I 60 I I ' ' so I Cll -::i ' -40~ ' I -I ·-ac: ' ·' 30 ' ' ' I ' 20 ' I -I ' ' I 10 ' 0 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 Exudation Pressure (psi) Cover Thickness by Expansion and Exudation (ft) 3.00 g ,,,,,,. . ,. ... ..... 1.40 c 2.50 -- 0 .... "'< -+:O ---- 1.20 RI "'L-' I-' , .,, :I 2.00 " I---+-)( _ ,_ , _ ;;-"" .... .,..,... 1.00 ______..__ > ..0 1.50 ~ "' _J.-..l "' .? .... 0.80 --1---Cll -"' ~ c ~ 1.00 ~ u i.. r-"' --0.60 ----r---:c ______..__ I-..... ..., ~-.......... ~ ______..__ ... 0.50 0.40 ~ ~ ;.-"" ~ 0 "' I - u I ,..;~ 0.00 0.20 0 .00 0.50 1 .00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3 .00 -- 0.00 Cover Thickness by Expansion (ft) 9.5 10.5 11.5 12.5 -By Expansion I I Moisture Content(%) Cover -av Exudation = 0.58 Thickness (ft) The data above is based upon processing and testing samples as received from the field . Test procedures in accordance with latest revisions to Department of Transportation, State of California, Materials & Research Test Method No. 301 and/or ASTM Standard D2844 Remarks : A traffic index of 4.0 was used for calculation purposes , ~ NMG Set UP by : BAJ Run by: BAJ/TG Calculated by: TG Checked by: BAJ/TG Date Completed: 1/21/2019 Gczotczchnical, Inc. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 155 of 293 R-VALUE TEST DATA CTM 301 I ASTM 02844 Project: ASCENerdugo Borin g Trench No: H-3 Field Description : La b Desc ripti on : Brown silty CLAY Specimen Number Mold Number Water Adjustment (g) Compactor Pressure (psi) Exudation Pressure (psi) Gross Weight (g) Mold Tare (q) Wet Weight (q) Sample Height (in) Initial Dial Readinq Final Dial Reading Expansion (in x1 o-4 ) Stability(psi) at 2,000 lbs (160 psi) Turns Displacement R-Value Uncorrected R-Value Corrected Moisture Content (%) Drv Density ( ocf) Assumed Traffic Index G.E. by Stability G .E. by Expansion Gt Dish No . Weight of Moist Soil and Dish (g) Weight of Dry Soil and Dish (g) Water Loss (g) Weight of Dish (g) Dry Soil (g) Moisture Content(%) Project No: 18165-01 Sample No: B-1 1 2 4 5 +95 +80 100 125 172 310 3265.2 3230.1 2115.1 2118.4 1150 .1 1111 .7 2.53 2.50 0 .0415 0 .0622 0.0415 0.0645 0 23 80 I 158 62 I 132 3.25 3.27 1 14 1 14 15 .2 14.1 119.6 118.1 4 .0 4.0 1.01 0.88 0.00 0 .77 1.25 Moisture Content w L 323 .9 298.4 287 .9 267.7 36.0 30 .7 50.4 49.8 237 .5 217.9 15.2 14 .1 R-Value by Exudation = R-Value by Expansion = R-Value at Equilibrium= Date: 1/18/2019 Sa mple Dept h: 1-3' 3 4 6 +65 250 564 3210.2 2115.9 1094.3 2.33 0.0020 0.0095 75 44 I 102 I 2 .69 35 30 12 .9 126.1 4.0 0 .72 2.50 s 322.2 291 .2 31 .0 50 .3 240 .9 12 .9 13 14 I 13 by Exudation I he data above is based upon processing and testing samples as received from the field . Test procedures in accordance with latest revisions to Department of Transportation, late of California, Materials & Research Test Method No. 301 and/or ASTM Standard 02844 A traffic index of 4.0 was used for calculation purposes. CAT/BAJ Run by: BAJ/TG lcul ated by: BAJ Checked by: TG/B AJ Date Completed ; · al, Inc. R-VALUE GRAPHICAL PRESENTATION Project: ASCE/Verdugo Project No: 18165-01 Date: 1/18/2019 Boring Trench No: H-3 Sample No: B-1 Sample Depth: 1-3' Field Description: Lab Description: Brown silty CLAY R-Value vs. Exudation Pressure c I I I I I 60 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . 50 I ' I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I I I I 40 I I I I I I I I I I I • I I I Cll I ::I I ' I I 30~ ' I -, ~ I I I I . I I I ' a: I I I I ( I I I I I I 20 I ·-I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I I I ...... 10 I -I I -I I I I I I ' I . ....... ' I I I I I I I I I l I I I .......... I I I I I I I I ·-I I 0 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 Exudation Pressure (psi) Cover Thickness by Expansion and Exudation (ft) 3 .00 g ,.v "" 3.00 c 2.50 !..-~ 2£i 0 ,_ .. ~/ ' "' 2.50 . -"Cl "" 11 ! -~ ::I 2.00 )( ,_v ... 1./ " > 2.00 .a 1.50 " "' ,_ ,,,"' "' """ QI -c ,.,_ ---1.50 " ~ 1.00 ·: u -:c " I-...-" ' .... a.so , .... - 1.00 ' ~ ~ /K 0 ~ --v 1 .... "' -0 .00 ·--0.50 ' ' " 0 .00 0 .50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 " '-"" 0.00 --Cover Thickness by Expansion (ft) 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 -By Expansion I I Moisture Content (%) Cover -By Exudation = 0.88 Thickness (ft) ~he data above is based upon processing and testing samples as rece ived from the field . Test procedures in accordance with latest revisions to Department of Transportation, !State of California, Materials & Research Test Method No . 301 and/or ASTM Standard D2844 !Remarks : A traffic index of 4 O was used for calculation purposes. ~ NMG !Set up by : CAT/BAJ Run by: BAJ/TG !Calculated by: BAJ Checked by : TG/BAJ Date Completed: 1 /21 /2019 Gcz:otcz:chnical, Inc. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 157 of 293 APPENDIX E: TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ATTACHMENT 2, Page 158 of 293 CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO VERDUGO STREET BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT (CIP 14106) TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for: City of San Juan Capistrano 32400 Paseo Adelanto San Juan Capistrano, California 92675 (949) 493-1171 By: Pirzadeh & Associates, Inc. 30 Executive Park, Suite 270 Irvine, California 92614-4726 (949) 851-1367 February 22, 2019 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 159 of 293 CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 5 A. Project I..ocation............................................................................... 5 B. Traffic Impact Analysis Study Locations.............................................. 5 EXISTING CONDITIONS ...................................................................................... 5 PROPOSED CONDITIONS .................................................................................... 6 FUTURE ACCESS ............................................................................................... 10 A Trip Distribution ......................................................................................... 10 ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY/APPROACH ............................................................. 10 EXISTING WITHOUT PROJECT......................................................................... 14 EXISTING WITH PROJECT................................................................................ 15 YEAR 2020 WITH PROJECT ................................................................................ 16 YEAR 2020 WITH PROJECT WITH FUTURE ACCESS ........................................... 18 SPECIAL ISSUES ................................................................................................ 20 A Impact During Construction......... .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . . .. .. . .. . .. .. . . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . . 20 B. Special Events................................................................................ 22 C. Loading/tJnloading Zones ................................................................. 22 D. Potential City Projects..................................................................... 25 REQUIRED MITIGATION MEASURES AND/OR RECOMMENDATIONS ................. 25 CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................. 25 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 160 of 293 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Table 5 Table 6 LOS Threshold at Signalized Intersection............................................... 13 LOS Threshold at Unsignalized Intersection........................................... 13 Existing Without Project Summary -Saturday Peak Hour........................ 14 Existing With Project Summary -Saturday Peak Hour............................. 15 Year 2020 With Project Summary -Saturday Peak Hour.......................... 16 Year 2020 w/Project w/Future Access Summary -Saturday Peak Hour....... 18 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Location Map........................................................................................ 2 Figure 2 Proposed Improvements........................... .. . . .. .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Figure 3 Study Locations ..................................................................................... 4 Figure 4 Existing Lane Configuration..... . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. . .. . . .. . . . .. . . . . .. . .. .. 7 Figure 5 Existing Saturday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes .......................................... 8 Figure 6 Existing Saturday Peak Hour Pedestrian Volumes.................................... 9 Figure 7 Future Restricted Access....................................... . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . .. . .. . . . .. 11 Figure 8 Future Restricted Access Trip Distribution.............................................. 12 Figure 9 Year 2020 Saturday Peak Hour Volumes ................................................. 17 Figure 10 Year 2020 Modified Saturday Peak Hour Volumes .................................... 19 Figure 11 Potential Construction Traffic Control Stages .......................................... 21 Figure 12 Potential Circulation During Special Events........................................... 23 Figure 13 Proposed Loading/Unloading Zone ......................................................... 24 APPENDIX Appendix A..................... . . . .. . . . . .. . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . Existing Counts Appendix B .................................................................................. Vistro Worksheets ATTACHMENT 2, Page 161 of 293 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Traffic Impact Analysis is prepared in association with the City of San Juan Capistrano initiated Verdugo Street Beautification project (CIP 14106), see Figure 1, and also as an update to the Verdugo Street Circulation Study dated April 2014 prepared by DKS and RK Engineering Group, Inc. The analysis format follows the City of San Juan Capistrano Administrative Policy 310 (Preparation of and Use of Traffic Studies). The goal of the beautification project is to construct improvements that will enhance the pedestrian experience in the downtown area by implementing a portion of Alternative One from the aforementioned circulation study. This includes narrowing the street width on Verdugo Street to one eastbound lane and one westbound lane for the entire length, widening the sidewalk, adding enhanced paving, adding enhanced street lighting, adding landscaping, and adding street furniture, see Figure 2. Additionally, during special events, Verdugo Street may be closed to vehicular traffic. Although not a part of this project, a potential future restricted access driveway may be implemented with the potential future parking structure at the Metrolink/Amtrak station surface parking lot. Per discussions with Staff, this analysis will evaluate potential impacts, if any, to Verdugo Street and the study locations under the Existing Without Project, Existing With Project, Year 2020 With Project, and Year 2020 With Project With Future Access scenarios. Verdugo Street is located within the Historic Town Center in the City of San Juan Capistrano. It connects with Camino Capistrano to the east and terminates into a cul-de-sac to the west. It is 315 feet long from centerline of the intersection to the center of the cul-de- sac and is classified as a Local Street. A railroad crossing signal is provided for pedestrians and emergency vehicles only west of the cul-de-sac. Per discussions with City staff, the study locations include the driveway off of Camino Capistrano approximately 795 feet north of Ortega Highway (Driveway 1), the signalized intersection of Camino Capistrano/Ortega Highway, the signalized intersection of Camino CapistranoNerdugo Street, and driveway off of Camino Capistrano approximately 245 feet south of Verdugo Street (Driveway 2). These locations are shown in Figure 3. The Vistro 7 software from PTV Group is used to evaluate the operation of the four study locations using methodologies from the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 6th Edition to determine the Level of Service (LOS). The result shows that the study locations will operate at an acceptable LOS under the study scenarios and no mitigation measures are required. In addition, the analysis discusses special issues relevant to the proposed project. It is recommended to construct the proposed improvements in multiple stages to minimize construction impacts to the vehicular and pedestrian circulation. It is also recommended to restrict the movements at Driveway 1 and Driveway 2 during special events when Verdugo Street is closed to vehicular traffic. Finally, it is recommended to enlarge the loading/unloading zone on Camino Capistrano just south of Verdugo Street to encompass the first three on-street parking stalls. The results of this Traffic Impact Analysis as detailed in the following sections show that the proposed project will not have an adverse impact at the study locations. 1 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 162of293 }> -I -I }> () I s:: m z -I "' ""O Q) cc Cl) ~ CJ) (...) 0 -"' (!) (...) 2122119 ! f N.T.S. Camino Del Avion Figure 1 Location Map Verdugo St Beautification, San Juan Capistrano Project Location (Verdugo St) )> -l -l )> 0 I $: m z -l 1\.) IJ O.l co CD __,. (}) ..i:::.. 0 -1\.) c.o w 2/22/19 9VERDUGOSTREETIMPROVEMENTS Project Concept by RRM Design Group Figure 2 Project Concept Verdugo St Beautification, San Juan Capistrano 2/22119 ! ~e~•-1\ f N.T.S. Metrolink/Amtrak Surface Parking Lot Verdugo Street Franciscan Plaza Parking Structure Figure 3 Study Locations Driveway2 Verdugo St Beautification San Juan C . t ' aplB rano 4 ® Ortega Hwy LEGEND • Study Location @Signalized Intersection --Ped Railroad Crossing ATTACHMENT 2, Page 165 of 293 INTRODUCTION This report summarizes the results of a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) prepared for the proposed Verdugo Street Beautification project (CIP 14106) in the City of San Juan Capistrano, see Figure 1. This TIA will also update the Verdugo Street Circulation Study dated April 2014 prepared by DKS and RK Engineering Group, Inc. The analysis follows the format of the City's Administrative Policy 310 (Preparation of and Use of Traffic Studies). The goal of this City of San Juan Capistrano initiated improvements project is to enhance the pedestrian experience in the downtown area. To achieve that, a portion of Alternative One from the aforementioned circulation study will be implemented, see Figure 2. This includes modifying eastbound Verdugo Street from the existing single left-turn lane and single right-turn lane at the intersection with Camino Capistrano to a single shared left and right-turn lane. The single westbound lane will remain. Other improvements include widening the sidewalk, adding enhanced paving, adding enhanced street lighting, adding landscaping, and adding street furniture on both sides of the street. Although not a part of this project, a potential future restricted access driveway may be implemented with the potential future parking structure at the Metrolink/Amtrak station surface parking lot. The purpose of this analysis is to evaluate the operational characteristics and design features of Verdugo Street and the study locations under the study scenarios based on discussions with City staff. A Project Location Verdugo Street is located within the Historic Town Center in downtown San Juan Capistrano. Nearby land uses include Mission San Juan Capistrano to the north, Historic Town Center Park to the southeast, and Metrolink/Amtrak station and Los Rios Street Historic District to the west. B. Traffic Impact Analysis Study Locations Per discussions with City staff, the study locations include the driveway off of Camino Capistrano approximately 795 feet north of Ortega Highway (Driveway 1), the signalized intersection of Camino Capistrano/Ortega Highway, the signalized intersection of Camino CapistranoNerdugo Street, and driveway off of Camino Capistrano approximately 245 feet south of Verdugo Street (Driveway 2). The study locations are shown on Figure 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS Driveway 1 is located on Camino Capistrano and is approximately 795 feet north of Ortega Highway. It is stop sign controlled on the driveway side and provides full access to a surface parking lot serving the Metrolink/Amtrak station and local businesses. Left-turn in and left- turn out access is provided by the existing two-way left-turn lane on Camino Capistrano. There is an existing driveway directly opposite that provides access to Mission Basilica. The intersection of Camino Capistrano/Ortega Highway is signalized. Due to the close proximity to the signalized intersection of Camino CapistranoNerdugo Street (175 feet centerline to centerline), both locations are controlled by the same traffic signal controller 5 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 166 of 293 .· and operate as an offset intersection. Camino Capistrano is a north-south roadway classified as a Secondary Highway that provides regional access within the City and to the 1-5 Freeway. At the study locations, it has one through lane in each direction that also serves as a bike route, a two-way left-turn lane, and street parking in designated stalls on both sides. Ortega Highway is an east-west roadway classified as a Primary Highway that provides regional access within the City and to the 1-5 Freeway. The intersection of Camino CapistranoNerdugo Street is signalized. Verdugo Street is an east-west roadway classified as a Local Street that connects with Camino Capistrano to the east and terminates into a cul-de-sac approximately 315 feet to the west. A railroad crossing signal is provided for pedestrian and emergency vehicles only west of the cul-de-sac. There are two driveways on the northerly side (Driveway 3 and Driveway 4) and one driveway on the southerly side (Driveway 5). Driveway 3, which is inbound only, and Driveway 4, which is outbound only, provide access to a surface parking lot serving the Metrolink/Amtrak station and local businesses. Driveway 5 provides access to a parking structure that also serves the Metrolink/Amtrak station and local businesses. From Camino Capistrano to Driveway 3, Verdugo Street is currently 38 feet wide that provides a 16-foot wide westbound lane, a 10-foot wide eastbound left-turn lane, and a 12-foot wide eastbound right-turn lane. West of Driveway 3, Verdugo Street transitions down to 30 feet wide that provides a 14-foot wide westbound lane and a 16-foot wide eastbound lane. The eastbound and westbound movements are separated by a striped centerline. Inbound access to Verdugo Street is provided by a southbound shared through/right-turn lane and a northbound left-turn lane on Camino Capistrano. Driveway 2 is located on Camino Capistrano approximately 245 feet south of Verdugo Street. It is stop sign controlled on the driveway side and provides full access to a parking structure serving the Metrolink/Amtrak station and local businesses. Left-turn in and left-turn out access is provided by the existing two-way left-turn lane on Camino Capistrano. The existing lane configuration at the study locations are shown in Figure 4. Existing traffic counts were collected at the four (4) study locations on Saturday, January 12, 2019 from 3 PM to 7 PM, see Figure 5, including additional counts at the three driveways on Verdugo Street. Counts were also collected during the same period on the number of pedestrians on both sides of Verdugo Street, see Figure 6. The count data sheets are included in Appendix A. PROPOSED CONDITIONS The Verdugo Street Beautification project (CIP 14106) will enhance the pedestrian experience by providing wider sidewalks, street paving, lighting, landscaping, and street furniture on both sides of Verdugo Street. To offset the wider sidewalks, the street width will be reduced. From Camino Capistrano to Driveway 3, the existing 38-foot section will be reduced to 28 feet. West of Driveway 3, the existing 30-foot section will be reduced to approximately 26 feet 7 inches. In addition, the existing 32-foot radius cul-de-sac will be reduced to a radius of 25 feet. The reduced width will result in one eastbound lane and one westbound lane for the entire length of the street. 6 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 167 of 293 ! f N.T.S. 2122119 Metrolink/Amtrak Surface Parking Lot 1 L ' ,, j__---.:V:-er~d:--:-u=go:-;S;;;t:;re~ett -~_jj' \ \ t Ir.> Franciscan Plaza ~ Parking Structure it : ·~ C) Figure 4 Driveway 2 Existing Lane Configuration Ortega Hwy LEGEND * Two-Way Left-Turn Lane Verdugo St Beautification, San Juan Capistrano 7 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 168 of 293 N.T.S. 2122119 Metrolink/Amtrak Surface Parking Lot ~ t I ~ Verdugo Street IQ Franciscan Plaza ~ Parking Structure it ~ ·~ Q Figure 5 Driveway 2 Existing Saturday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Verdugo St Beautification, San Juan Capistrano L1aa ,116 Ortega Hwy 8 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 169 of 293 ! f 2122/19 -.:2' ~ i ·~ ~ --- to ~ it Metrolink/Amtrak Surface Parking Lot ~ ~ i -~ ~ -35 Verdugo Street 87- -138 132- : Franciscan Plaza .... Q Parking Structure Driveway2 Figure 6 Existing Saturday Peak Hour Pedestrian Volumes Verdugo St Beautification, San Juan Capistrano Ortega Hwy n ~· 0 n ~ ,_. (ll q \:I) g 9 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 170 of 293 Other modifications include curb extensions (bulb-outs) at the Camino CapistranoNerdugo Street intersection as well as at the Driveway 3 easterly curb return, new pedestrian crossings at Driveway 3, and a new pedestrian crossing at Driveway 4. The proposed concept design is shown in Figure 2. FUTURE ACCESS A potential future right-turn in only access may be implemented on Camino Capistrano approximately 290 feet north of Ortega Highway, see Figure 7. It is not part of the Verdugo Street Beautification project and is associated with a potential future parking structure at the Metrolink/Amtrak station surface lot. However, the potential impacts at the study locations with the implementation of this potential future restricted access is analyzed under the Year 2020 With Project With Future Access scenario. It should be noted that the 2014 Circulation Study also analyzed a restricted access (right-turn in/out) at the same location. A. Trip Distribution For consistency with the 2014 circulation study, the same trip distribution percentages for the future access is used, see Figure 8. ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY Per discussions with City staff, the study locations are analyzed using methodologies from the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 6th Edition to determine the intersection Level of Service (LOS). Intersection LOS is a measure of the control delay experienced at the intersection and is defined as seconds per vehicle. It is used to quantify the amount of travel time increase. There are 6 LOS thresholds that range from A to F. LOS A has the least control delay and LOS F has the most control delay. The following is a description of the LOS thresholds from HCM. LOSA LOSB LOSC This level is typically assigned when the volume-to-capacity ratio is low and either progression is exceptionally favorable or the cycle length is very short. If LOS A is the result of favorable progression, most vehicles arrive dunng the green indication and travel through the intersection without stopping. This level is typically assigned when the volume-to-capacity ratio is low and either progression is highly favorable or the cycle length is short. More vehicles stop than with LOS A This level is typically assigned when progression is favorable or the cycle length is moderate. Individual cycle failures (i.e., one or more queued vehicles are not able to depart as a result of insufficient capacity during the cycle) may begin to appear at this level The number of vehicles stopping is significant, although many vehicles still pass through the intersection without stopping. 10 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 171of293 N.T.S. 2122/19 ---Verdugo Street AQ Franciscan Plaza ~ Parking Structure ~ : ..... Q Driveway 2 Figure 7 Potential Future Restricted Access Verdugo St Beautification, San Juan Capistrano Ortega Hwy 11 ATTACHMENT 2 , Page 172 of 293 N.T.S. 2/22/19 l\fetrolink/J\intrak Surface Parking Lot L -10% ---Verdugo Street lQ Franciscan Plaza ~ Parking Structure ~ ~ ·~ C) Figure 8 Driveway2 Potential Future Restricted Access Trip Distribution Verdugo St Beautification, San Juan Capistrano Ortega Hwy 12 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 173 of 293 LOSD LOSE LOSF This level is typically assigned when the volume-to-capacity ratio is high and either progression is ineffective or the cycle length is long. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable. This level is typically assigned when the volume-to-capacity ratio is high, progression is unfavorable, and the cycle length is long. Individual cycle failures are frequent. This level is typically assigned when the volume-to-capacity ratio is very high, progression is very poor, and the cycle length is long. Most cycles fail to clear the queue. Source: Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition The LOS threshold that corresponds to the control delay range at a signalized intersection is shown in Table 1 below. Table 1 LOS Threshold at Signalized Intersection Control Delay (•/veh) ~10 >10-20 >20-35 >35-55 >55-80 >80 LOS by Yolurne=tctCapadty Ratio• s1.o >1.o A F B F C F D F E F F F Note: • For approach-based and lntersectlonwlcle assessments, LOS Is defined solely by control delay. Source: Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition The LOS threshold that corresponds to the control delay range at an unsignalized intersection is shown in Table 2 below. As noted, the LOS is applicable to each approach on a minor street and is not calculated for the major street approach or the intersection. Table 2 LOS Threshold at Unsignalized Intersection Control Delay s veh 0-10 >10-15 >15-25 >25-35 >35-50 >SO LOS bv Volume-to:Capadty Batto v/c s 1.0 v/c > 1.0 A F B F C F D F E F F F Note: The LOS atterla apply to ead1 lane on a given approach and to each approach on the minor street. LOS Is not calculated for major-street approaches or for the Intersection as a whole. Source: Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition 13 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 174 of 293 Per the City of San Juan Capistrano General Plan Circulation Element, the acceptable LOS is D at intersections other than "Traffic Operations Hot Spots". None of the study locations are designated as a hot spot. Study scenarios analyzed in this report include the Existing Without Project, Existing With Project, Year 2020 With Project, and Year 2020 With Project With Future Access. The existing scenarios are based on the existing peak hour volumes. The Year 2020 scenarios are based on applying a 5% increase to the existing peak hour volumes to account for the traffic generated from nearby projects. Using the Vistro 7.0 software from PTV Group, the study locations are modeled based on the existing roadway geometry, striping, volumes, and traffic control. Signal timing charts for the signalized intersections of Camino Capistrano/Ortega Highway and Camino CapistranoNerdugo Street was provided by City of San Juan Capistrano. The control delay and LOS are then calculated for each scenario. EXISTING WITHOUT PROJECT The Existing Without Project scenario evaluates the performance at the study locations using existing traffic counts shown in Figure 5. The calculated delay (seconds/vehicle) and LOS are shown in Table 3. Table 3 Existing Without Project Summary · Saturday Peak Hour Study Location Camino 1 Capistrano at Dwyl Camino 2 Capistrano at Ortega Hwy Camino 3 Capistrano at Verdugo St Camino 4 Capistrano at Driveway 2 Delay1 LOS2 Delay1 LOS2 Delay1 LOS2 Delay1 LOS2 Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Thru Right Left Thru Right 8 19 11 21 19 11 B 44 D 8 A 1. Approach Delay is seconds/vehicle 2. Approach LOS At Location 1, the through movements on Camino Capistrano is not controlled and the delay/LOS are not calculated. The minor street approaches have associated delay and LOS for each approach (left, through, and right). The same situation applies for the eastbound approach at Location 4. 14 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 175 of 293 At Location 2 and 3, each allowable movement has associated delay and LOS. However, these two locations are signalized and the intersection delay and LOS are the applicable performance measures. Therefore, all of the study locations are operating at LOS C or better, which is an acceptable LOS, in the Existing Without Project scenario. EXISTING WITH PROJECT The Existing With Project scenario evaluates the performance at the study locations with the implementation of the proposed project using existing traffic counts shown in Figure 5. The calculated delay (seconds/vehicle) and LOS are shown in Table 4. Table 4 Existing With Project Summary · Saturday Peak Hour Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Study Location Measure Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Camino Delay1 8 8 l~fil 20 19 11 21 19 11 ~~ ~~}: j.j~~i 1 Capistrano at ti~~ ~~ "< •• 2 3 4 LOS2 ..., Driveway 1 A A r;;.~ >:.fl\; c c B c c B Camino Delay1 ·~r1;""C 9 7 43 43 ... :i·t~J;.i ~~·~ !.,!.f.'}I 43 ::.-;;.;.:,;~ 44 Capistrano at LOS2 ~ A A D D l;'ff l '.'l~IH I~~ t·2l'! D 3;?. -![~; D --~ Ortega Hwy Intersection Delay = 28 s/veh Intersection LOS = C Camino Delay1 35 20 r i.;,:~ .• ,~.1pif~I 24 31 rt.~ 31 ~~)r .12~! ... '..-;~~, Capistrano at LOS2 c c I L~~~-:t ~:•.:-U c c t:t':-~i~'I c 1;_, :.:~r •. ~:':~i l'~\ ·· Verdugo St Intersection Delay = 24 s/veh Intersection LOS = C Camino Delay 1 I ,~ I~ ~: ~~f!.·~ (~~ it.' .•.. , :'\II'! 1 ~'.!~t ~i·s1J ~·~ :~f~·· 8 .•'."' t:.: 17 11 .~.;-~ ,, .--:~ ....... Capistrano at . ~· ~.Jf-./6 :LI' "' ~ ~~ ~ i!ti !~?i~ ~~-=-Driveway 2 LOS2 A -· ~ ·-...... c B ·~ "r.- 1. Approach Delay is seconds/vehicle 2. Approach LOS There are no changes to the delay and LOS at Location 1, Location 2, and Location 4 compared to the Existing Without Project scenario. At Location 3, the modification to Verdugo Street from one eastbound left-turn lane and one eastbound right-turn lane to a shared left and right-turn lane will result in a small increase to the delay for each movement. In addition, the intersection delay will increase by 1 to 24 seconds/vehicle but with the LOS remaining at C. Therefore, all of the study locations will continue to operate at LOS C or better, which is an acceptable LOS, in the Existing With Project scenario. 15 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 176 of 293 YEAR 2020 WITH PROJECT The Year 2020 With Project scenario evaluates the performance at the study locations with the implementation of the proposed project using projected Year 2020 trips shown in Figure 9. The calculated delay (seconds/vehicle) and LOS are shown in Table 5. Table 5 Year 2020 With Project Summary -Saturday Peak Hour Study Location 22 20 12 B Camino 3 Capistrano at Verdugo St 1-..:.::;.:;........1.....,;;;;......J.....;.;;.....ii;i,;;~::.a.,;:=.;..J..-.....;._~l--;;....~:.a:;;;:::a........;;.....a:.~=ao~.a.t..1~~ 1. Approach Delay is seconds/vehicle 2. Approach LOS At Location 1, the northbound and southbound left-turn movements will remain at the same delay and LOS for the Year 2020 With Project scenario compared to the Existing With Project scenario. There are minor increases to the delay for the eastbound and westbound movements but the LOS will remain the same. At Location 2, the delay and LOS for the northbound movements will remain the same. The southbound movements will see a minor increase in the delay. The westbound movements will also see a minor increase in the delay. In addition, the applicable performance measures of intersection delay will increase by 1 to 29 seconds/vehicle and the LOS will remain at C. At Location 3, the LOS for the northbound left-turn movement will change to D while the delay for the southbound movements will see a minor increase. There will be a minor increase to the delay for the eastbound movements. However, the applicable performance measures of intersection delay and LOS will remain the same. At Location 4, the northbound left-turn movement delay and LOS will remain the same. The eastbound movements will see a minor increase in delay. Therefore, all of the study locations will continue to operate at LOS C or better, which is an acceptable LOS, in the Year 2020 With Project scenario. 16 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 177 of 293 N.T.S. 0 \· 0 c;; ~· Metrolink/Amtrak ~ Surface Parking Lot ~ 0 ~ cQ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q) ·~ ·~ A A \ cD CJ> L140 r122 r co""" CJ> C'1 CQ r-4 CJ> or,, r-4 i::-""" -1 \ \ """ 0 r-4 2122119 ~, I t:: Verdugo Street lO Franciscan Plaza ~ Parking Structure Et ~ ·~ Q Figure 9 Driveway2 Year 2020 Saturday Peak Hour Volumes Verdugo St Beautification, San Juan Capistrano 66j 1\ 461 1:-C'1 ~~ """ 1:- """""" -1 \ 4j ,, 261 co~ r-4 """ Ortega Hwy 17 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 178of293 YEAR 2020 WITH PROJECT WITH FUTURE ACCESS The Year 2020 With Project With Future Access scenario evaluates the performance at the study locations with the implementation of the proposed project plus the potential future right-turn in only access into the Metrolink/Amtrak station surface parking lot using projected Year 2020 trips. The trip distribution shown in Figure 8 is used to modify the Year 2020 volumes to take into account the future restricted access, see Figure 10. The calculated delay (seconds/vehicle) and LOS are shown in Table 6. Table 6 Year 2020 With Project With Future Access Summary· Saturday Peak Hour Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Camino Delay1 8 21 12 22 20 12 1 Capistrano at t-----1------~--...... -~--t.-~'"!"f'~~t--+---+---t---T--tr-----t Driveway 1 LOS2 B Camino Delay1 2 Capistrano at 1--=LO~S:...2 .....&;;;.;.;:.:.;.;;.:iL....;;.;....L-.:.:......L.....;;;..-.L.....;;.--1.;..;,.;.~~~;.io.=~~~~....;;......1;ii;..,~L....,;~ Ortega Hwy Camino Delay1 3 Capistrano at LOS2 Verdugo St 1-=~...a.....:;--J'---;;;..._.r.;;....;;;:....L.;;..;..;.;..;.:i... ___ --li--;;;..._J.-;,;....;..,;i,_....;;......a;;;::.;.......a;;.....--oi~~ Camino Delay1 8 4 Capistrano at l-----1---1~.;.:,..M~.....,~,m......,.;.+"-':"'~l---¥-~iff---++~~~i+.-o,-Tt Driveway 2 LOS2 A 1. Approach Delay is seconds/vehicle 2 . Approach LOS At Location 1, the delay for the eastbound through movement will see a minor increase compared to the Year 2020 With Project scenario but there are no changes to the other movements. At Location 2, The delay for the westbound movement will have a minor decrease. However, the applicable performance measures of intersection delay and LOS will remain the same. At Location 3, the northbound through movement delay will see a minor increase as well as the southbound movements. The eastbound movements will see a minor decrease in the delay. However, the applicable performance measures of intersection delay and LOS will remain the same. At Location 4, the delay and LOS for all movements will remain the same. Therefore, all of the study locations will continue to operate at LOS C or better, which is an acceptable LOS, in the Year 2020 With Project With Future Access scenario. 18 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 179 of 293 ! f N.T.S. 2122119 MetrolinkJAmtrak Surface Parking Lot ~ ~ i ·~ A ~ ai \ ct:) ~ i ·~ A \ ""' ai Verdugo Street i§ t I ~ IQ Franciscan Plaza ~ Parking Structure It ~ ...... Q Driveway2 Figure 10 L140 ,122 \ ct) ..,, ai~ cQ~ ai '° ~ ~""' _! \ 66-1 1\ 461 t-~ ~~ ""' t- ""'""' _! \ 4J 1\ 261 ct)~ ~""' Year 2020 Modified Saturday Peak Hour Volumes Verdugo St Beautification, San Juan Capistrano Ortega Hwy 19 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 180 of 293 SPECIAL ISSUES The following section discusses special issues that are relevant to the proposed beautification project. These include construction impacts to the vehicular and pedestrian circulation, vehicular circulation during special events, loading/unloading zones, and other potential City projects. A Impacts During Construction A.a shown on Figure 2, the proposed project will construct improvements on the north side of Verdugo Street from Camino Capistrano to Driveway 3 and along the full length on the south side, including at the cul-de-sac. There will be temporary impacts to the vehicular and pedestrian circulation due to construction. However, impacts could be reduced by separating the activities into multiple stages, see Figure 11. The improvements on the north side of Verdugo Street could be constructed as one stage. It will require the closure of the northerly sidewalk all along Verdugo Street, the closure of unmarked crossings at Driveway 3/Driveway 4, the closure of crosswalk on the west leg of Camino CapistranoNerdugo Street intersection, and signing one or two parking stalls closest to the intersection for no parking. One 12-foot eastbound travel lane, one 12-foot westbound travel lane, and a 2-foot buffer in between could be provided via temporary striping. Full vehicular access could be maintained at the Camino CapistranoNerdugo Street intersection. Pedestrian detour could be implemented for crossing at Ortega Highway and at the south leg of Camino CapistranoN erdugo Street intersection. The improvements on the south side of Verdugo Street and the cul-de-sac could be constructed as a separate stage. It will include closure of the southerly sidewalk all along Verdugo Street, the closure of sidewalk on the south leg of Camino CapistranoNerdugo Street intersection, and signing one or two parking stalls closest to the intersection for no parking. One 11-foot eastbound travel lane, one 11-foot westbound travel lane, and a 2-foot buffer in between could be provided via temporary striping. Full vehicular access could be maintained at the signalized intersection. Pedestrian detour could be implemented for crossing at Ortega Highway and at the Forster Street crossing. Also, pedestrian connections to the local businesses to the south fronting Verdugo Street will need to be maintained. The curb extension at the east side of the Camino CapistranoNerdugo Street intersection could be constructed as a standalone stage. Two or three on-street parking stalls to the north and south will need to be signed for no parking. However, the signalized intersection will continue to provide full vehicular access. The easterly sidewalk will have to be closed at the intersection and pedestrians could be directed to cross at Ortega Highway and at the Forster Street crossing. The remaining project improvements including color concrete crosswalks, the in- street pavers, and pavers at the railroad crossing could be constructed in separate three or four sequential segments during off-peak hours or at night to minimize impacts. If any vehicular travel lane needs to be closed on Camino Capistrano, detour via El Camino Real and Forster Street could be implemented. If one of the vehicular 20 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 181 of 293 ~ -I )> 0 I s: m z -I N "'U !l> co CD 2/22/19 Project Concept by RRM Design Group ~r------------------------------------------------,r------------------------------~ N 0 -N <.D VJ Figure 11 Potential Construction Traffic Control Stages Verdugo St Beautification, San Juan Capistrano through lanes on Verdugo Street needs to be closed, additional detour signage should be added in the parking structure and surface lot to direct access to Driveway 1 or Driveway 2. B. Special Events During special events, Verdugo Street could be closed to through traffic. Access to the Metrolink/Amtrak surface parking lot will be via Driveway 1 and access to the Franciscan Plaza parking structure will be via Driveway 2. Recommended traffic control measures are discussed below and shown in Figure 12. At Driveway 1, it is recommended to install temporary traffic control devices to limit this access to right-turns in/out only. This includes temporary devices in front of the driveway on Camino Capistrano and signage. Vehicles from the south wishing to access the surface lot or exiting vehicles wishing to travel north could be detoured around via El Camino Real and La Zanja Street. Acjachema Street should be closed to through traffic to prevent cut through vehicles. Driveway 3 and Driveway 4 will also have to be closed at the surface parking lot on-site drive aisle to prevent vehicles from exiting onto Verdugo Street. At Driveway 2, it is recommended to also install temporary traffic control devices to limit this access to right-turn in/out only. This includes temporary devices in front of the driveway on Camino Capistrano and signage. Vehicles from the south wishing to access the parking structure or exiting vehicles wishing to travel north could be detoured around via Del Obispo Street and Ortega Highway. Driveway 5 will also have to be closed at the parking structure entry to prevent vehicles from exiting Verdugo Street. C. Loading/Unloading Zones There are a number of designated on-street loading/unloading zones on both sides of Camino Capistrano in the vicinity of Verdugo Street. One zone that is impacted by the proposed project is located at the southwest corner of the project intersection. The existing zone encompasses the first two marked on-street parking stalls just south of Verdugo Street. The proposed project will remove the existing curb returns and construct curb extensions (bulb-outs) at the intersection. The curb extension at the southwest corner will transition back to the existing curb line at the first on-street parking stall and will not reduce the number of stalls provided. However, the curb extension will increase the difficulty for delivery trucks to maneuver into the loading/unloading zone. Therefore, it is recommended to increase the loading/unloading zone to encompass the first three parking stalls, see Figure 13. There is also a loading/unloading zone located on Driveway 3 just north of Verdugo Street. The proposed project will also remove the existing easterly curb return at Driveway 3 and construction a curb extension. The curb extension will reduce the zone by a nominal distance but it can still be accessed by delivery trucks. No recommendations are proposed at this location. 22 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 183 of 293 ! f N.T.S. 2/22/19 Figure 12 Verdu o Street ...l , Forster St i Potential Circulation During Special Events Verdugo St Beautification, San Juan Capistrano 23 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 184 of 293 ! f o~ N.T.S. Verdugo St 1 ~ 2 Proposed ~ Loading/Unloading Zone 3 ~ 2122/19 Figure 13 Proposed Loading/Unloading Zone Verdugo St Beautification, San Juan Capistrano 24 L • r 0 ~ ~· 0 0 r -s. q ~ g L. • ATTACHMENT 2, Page 185 of 293 The proposed project will not impact the other loading/unloading zone at Driveway 4 just north of Verdugo Street. No recommendations are proposed here. D. Potential City Projects City of San Juan Capistrano is currently evaluating a potential valet operation to occur after the peak hour at Driveway 3 and possibly at Driveway 4. The operation will utilize the existing loading/unloading zones. Existing Driveway 3 is 26 feet wide and existing Driveway 4 is 24 feet wide that can accommodate a valet staging area plus space for entering/exiting vehicles. It is recommended to coordinate the delivery hours with the adjacent businesses to avoid conflict with the valet operation. REQUIRED MITIGATION MEASURES AND/OR RECOMMENDATIONS A total of four scenarios have been analyzed for the City of San Juan Capistrano initiated Verdugo Street Beautification project (CIP 14106). There are minor delay changes between the various scenarios. However, the approach LOS at Driveway 1 and Driveway 2 will remain at an acceptable level. This is the same for the intersection LOS at Camino Capistrano/Ortega Highway and Camino CapistranoNerdugo Street. Therefore, no mitigation measures are required due to the implementation of the proposed project. Recommendations have been provided to minimize the construction impacts as well as during special events when Verdugo Street could be closed. In addition, it is recommended to increase the loading/unloading zone at the southwest corner of Camino CapistranoNerdugo Street to encompass the first three on-street parking stalls. CONCLUSIONS This report presents the findings of a Traffic Impact Analysis prepared for the proposed Verdugo Street Beautification project (CIP 14106) within Historic Town Center in the City of San Juan Capistrano. The four study locations were analyzed under the Existing Without Project, Existing With Project, Year 2020 With Project, and Year 2020 With Project With Future Access scenarios. The analysis also evaluated special issues that are relevant to the proposed project. Based on this analysis and the recommendations, it is concluded that the study locations have adequate carrying capacity to implement the proposed project and pose no adverse impacts to the adjacent roadway system. 25 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 186 of 293 Appendix A Existing Counts ATTACHMENT 2, Page 187of293 )> --i --i )> () I s:: m z --i "' ""O Q) co (1) ...... CX> CX> 0 -"' c.o w National Data & Surveying Services Intersection Turning Movement Count uatton: cam1no capistrano a Mission Basilica School Par1clng Lot City: San Juan Capistrano Project m: 19-01006-001 Control: 2-Way Stop (EB/WB) Dmt: 1/12/2019 Total Ci1T1lno captsttano Cimino taplstrano Mission BaslHca School Parking Lot Mission Basl1k:3 School Parking Lot. NORTiiBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASlllOUND WESTBOUND 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU B. ET ER BJ WL WT WR WU 3:00 7 101 1 0 0 74 3 0 3 0 8 0 1 0 3 0 3:15 6 95 1 1 1 82 0 0 4 0 8 0 1 0 1 0 3:30 PM 6 114 1 0 1 % 2 0 5 0 15 0 1 0 1 0 3:45 PM s 11 2 2 2 0 80 2 0 4 1 5 0 2 0 4 0 4:00 PM 8 104 11 I 0 96 3 0 0 1 9 0 1 0 0 0 4:15PM 16 119 2 1 0 94 3 0 2 0 5 0 1 0 2 0 4:30PM 8 95 4 0 0 107 6 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4:45PM 9 110 l 0 0 102 5 0 1 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 5:00 PM 9 91 1 1 0 87 2 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 2 0 5:15 PM 9 113 1 0 0 99 5 0 4 0 10 0 1 0 0 0 5:30 PM 5 105 3 2 3 87 4 0 3 0 8 0 5 0 4 0 5:45 PM 17 90 8 0 3 n 3 0 2 0 6 0 1 0 3 0 6:00PM 8 80 7 3 2 74 7 0 s 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 6:15 PM 17 70 0 0 0 71 3 0 2 0 10 0 1 0 0 0 6:30PM 6 B6 1 1 0 73 0 0 3 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 6:45 6 84 0 0 0 63 5 0 2 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 NL NU SL ST SR SU a ET ER EU WL WT WR WU 142 12 10 1357 53 0 44 2 112 0 16 0 21 0 8.04% 0.68% 0.70% 95.56% 3.73% 0.00% 27.85% 1.27% 70.89% 0.00% 43.24% 0.00% 56.76% 0.00% 35 449 4 1 366 10 0 11 2 34 0 5 0 7 0 0.547 0.500 0.250 0.953 0.833 0.000 0.550 0.500 0.567 0.000 0.625 0.000 0.438 0•000 0.952 0.588 0.500 TOTAL 201 200 242 219 234 245 223 234 199 242 229 205 192 174 176 167 lUTAL 3382 TOTAL 940 0,959 Prepared by National Data & Swveying Services Camino Capistrano & Mission Basilica School Parking Lot Peak Hour Turning Movement Count ID: 19-01006-001 Day: Saturday Date: 01/12/2019 City: San Juan Capistrano UJ IC 5 ::c ll!: c w a.. NONE AM 0 0 0 0 0 AM NONE NONE NOON 0 0 0 0 0 NOON NONE 03:30 PM -04:30 PM PM 10 366 1 0 467 PM 03:00 PM -07:00 PM AM NOON PM PM NOON AM 0 1 0 0 45 ~ 0 0 ot. 1 o o 1 .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 .:» 0 0.,. 5 0 0 0 0 11 _, 0 0 0 940 oC' o o o NOON PM 0 0 2 -+ 1 0.96 c:::> 19 0 0 0 0 34.,,0 0 0 1 0 AM NOON PM -!). " ., t ,. PM NOON AM n 0 c :!j "ll m :a 6 5! Total Vehicles (AM) PM 409 4 35 449 16 PM Total Vehicles (AM) NOON 0 0 Q Q 0 NOON AM 0 0 0 0 0 AM Total Vehicles (NOON) Total Vehicles (NOON) Total Vehicles (PM) _J., • ~L ,, t. .. ~ .. " ~ --·-- , Pedestrians (Crouwalks) '\ _J L ~ / z z ' 0 ., + ~ <;) , l ~ ~ ~ ~ l ~ 0 !["]! 1)111 loo o o o ol 11° ___, .. t r'j-- No: g. -+~~1 ·8 :.,. I I AM 0 0 AM Total Vehicles (PM) Ne:,: 8+ I t g :~ON _J L PM Q-+ .. Q PM .,.~ --;io o o o o o" _, t. 0 ... 1 z z 1~~ •(Q} 0 -..l~~~~l, ~ " ; 0 "b.. _6 ~ --·-- ATTACHMENT 2, Page 189 of 293 ~I -I ~ () I s: m z -I N -u ID co CD ....... c.o 0 0 -N c.o w National Data & Surveying Services Intersection Turning Movement Count Location: Camino Capistrano &. Ortega Hwy City: San Juan Capistrano Project ID: 19-01006-002 Control: Siganllzed Date: 1/12/2019 Total cam1no Capistrano I Camino Capistrano I Ortega Hwy I Ortega Hwy NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND I EASTBOUND I WESTBOUND 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU I EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 3:00 PM 0 88 36 0 19 65 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 31 0 24 1 264 3:15 PM 0 69 47 0 21 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 32 3 276 3:30 PM 0 96 31 0 30 79 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 0 29 0 301 3:45 PM 0 92 30 0 22 71 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 I 29 0 26 1 271 4:00 PM 0 90 28 0 26 82 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 41 0 298 4:15PM 0 101 29 0 19 78 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 37 0 284 4:30 PM 0 65 21 0 19 90 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 36 0 38 0 269 4:45 PM 0 83 34 0 24 79 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 37 0 32 0 289 5:00 PM 0 71 23 0 I 25 75 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 I 44 0 25 0 263 5:15 PM 0 96 32 0 25 76 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 0 33 0 294 5:30 PM 0 88 21 0 30 76 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 0 24 1 285 5;45 PM 0 85 30 0 19 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 0 35 0 271 6:00 PM 0 75 28 0 22 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 0 25 0 253 6:15 PM 0 57 31 0 23 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 0 26 0 241 6:30 PM 0 80 32 0 21 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 0 22 0 254 6:45 PM 0 58 27 0 I 17 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 0 27 0 226 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU a ET ER EU WL WT WR WU I TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 1294 480 0 362 1139 0 0 0 0 0 0 582 0 476 6 4339 APPROACH "''s : 0.00% n.94% 27.06% 0.00% 24.12% 75.88% 0.00% 0.00% 54.70% 0.00% 44.74% 0.56% P!AKHR: -03:30 PM • 04:30 PM -TOTAL ~HllVOL: 0 379 18 0 97 310 0 0 0 0 0 0 116 0 133 1 ft54 PEAIC.-Hii'F~: 0.000 0938 0.952 O.Ooo 0.808 0.945 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.806 0.000 0.811 0.250 ... o :9si.I 0.956 0.933 0.868 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services Camino Capistrano & Ortega Hwy Peak Hour Turning Movement Count ID: 19-01006-002 City: San Juan Capistrano NONE AM 0 0 0 0 NONE NOON 0 0 0 0 03:30 PM -04:30 PM PM 0 310 97 0 AM NOON PM 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 ¢:i 0 0 0 .:» 0 0 0 512 Day: Saturday Date: 01/12/2019 AM NONE NOON NONE PM 03:00 PM -07:00 PM PM NOON AM 1 t. 133 0 0 0 .. 0 0 0 1 .,. 116 0 0 o o o _,o 0 0 1154 0 C" 1 0 0 NOON PM 0 0 0 .... 0 0.96 0 0 0 ~ 0 c:::> 216 0 0 0 0 1 1 AM NOON PM ..!). '1 4' t ,. PM NOON AM (') 0 c: ~ "D !D ~ Total Vehicles (AM) PM 426 0 0 379 118 PM Total Vehicles (AM) Total Vehicles (NOON) Total Vehicles (PM) _J., • ~L .I~ t. .. ~ .. ~ ' --·-- NOON 0 0 0 Q 0 NOON AM 0 0 0 0 0 AM Total Vehicles (NOON) .(t / Pedestrians (Crosswalks) ' '\, ~~ , i I ~ ~ I ! "' o 0 ~~loo o o o ol ~O NC:,~ g ... ~--• g :a. _A_M_--'!Q!!-Q AM AM Q Q AM NooN at to NOON _J L PM Q-+ +o Q PM .,.~ ;::;io o o o o o ~ .I t. o 0 "' i I ~ ~ I ! ~ ~~ .. [;aj .. 0 ~ ~ ' .fa. _,,. ~ --....... - Total Vehicles (PM) ATTACHMENT 2, Page 191 of 293 )> ~ ~ )> 0 :c s: m z ~ N "U OJ (Q CD ~ co N 0 -N co w National Data & Surveying Services Intersection Turning Movement Count Location: cam1no caplstrano &. Verdugo St City: San Juan captstrano Projed: ID: 19-0lOOHOJ Control: Siganllzed Date: 1/12/2019 Total camlno capistrano camlno caplstrano Verdugo St Verdugo St NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 M. NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU 12 97 0 0 0 87 14 0 22 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 19 90 0 0 0 86 16 0 31 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 16 94 0 0 0 87 23 0 31 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 9 106 0 0 0 81 20 1 16 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 13 95 0 0 0 104 5 0 18 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 6 110 0 0 0 95 9 0 20 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 16 83 0 0 0 109 10 0 10 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 11 95 0 0 0 92 20 0 18 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 11 83 0 0 0 103 17 0 14 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 20 108 0 0 0 105 10 a 16 a 7 0 a 0 0 a 22 97 a a 0 99 24 a 15 0 10 a 0 0 0 0 15 92 0 a 0 64 34 0 19 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 26 n 0 0 0 70 26 0 22 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 27 75 0 0 0 78 27 a 19 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 1B 85 0 0 0 74 31 0 24 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 13 68 0 0 0 65 33 0 25 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL VOLUMES : 254 145S 0 0 0 1399 319 1 320 0 225 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH "°'s : 14.86% 85.140/a 0.000/a 0 .00% 0.00% 81.38% 18.56% 0.06% 58.72% 0.00% 41.28% 0.00% PEAICHR: 04:llS PM -OS:4S PM . POICHRVOL: 64 383 0 o. 0 399 71 0 63 0 44 0 0 0 0 0 PeAICi .. FACTOR..; o.nv 0.887 o;ooo 0.000 0.000 0.950 0.740 0.000 0.875 0.000 0.786 0.000 0 .000 0.000 0.000 0.000 o :8n 0.955 0.836 : TOTAL 250 254 264 249 250 250 240 250 241 266 267 246 244 241 243 218 TOTAL 3973 TOTAL 1024 0.959 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services Camino Capistrano & Verdugo St Peak Hour Turning Movement Count ID: 19-01006-003 City: San Juan Capistrano UJ cc :::> 0 ::c ~ NONE I AM 0 I 0 I 0 NONE INOON 0 I 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 Day: Saturday Date: 01 /12/2019 AM I NONE NOONI NONE 8 c ~ .,, '" :a :i A. 04:45 PM -05:45 PM I PM 71 I 399 I 0 0 446 PM I 03:00 PM -07:00 PM 6 g AM NOON PM ., . ~ "' 11" PM NOON AM 0 1 o I o 1135 <? 0 0 ot. o o o 0 .. 0 0 0 o.i-o o o 0 I 10241 0 C' 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 ,:,o 0 0 63 J 1 0 o Io -+ o NOON! PM 0.96 o I o 1 44 "\-1 ~ o I o Io 0 1 1 0 AM NOON PM -0-"' ., t ,. PM NOON AM Total Vehicles (AM) _J., • ~L .# " .. ~ .. " '" ,., . ,., Total Vehicles (NOON) _J., • ~L .# ~" .. ~ .. " '" ,., . ,., Total Vehicles (PM) _J., • ~L .# ~" .. ~ .. " '" --·-- PM 443 0164 1 383 1 0 PM NOON 0 0 1 010 1 0 NOON AM 0 0 1 0 1 010 AM Pedeatrlana (Crosswalks) <$Q_ "\, "".8 z z ~ 0 ~ ~~ :t8:t :1il ... 0 ~ ...-A. z c c 0 ~~loco coo~ Total Vehicles (AM) _J., • ~L !~! "~'" ,., t ,., Total Vehicles (NOON) _J., • ~L '~" .. -G;· .. " . '" ,., t ,., ~ Q PM PM Q. •o NOON NOON Q Q AM AM Q ~ Q AM •M o it to NOON _J L NOON Qt +,; Q PM .,.~ PMQ ..... ,# t, ;:;io 0 o o o ol '~ •I~]• Total Vehicles (PM) 0 ~:E :18:1 ~ '\" '" 0 -..lzc CZL "rt-~ --·-- 0 ~ ATTACHMENT 2, Page 193 of 293 National Data & Surveying Services Intersection Turning Movement Count Location: camlno caplstrano &. Franciscan Plaza Shopping Center Parking Struaure City: San Juan cap1strano Project ID: 19-01006-004 Control: No Control Dal'e: 1/12/2019 Total Cimino Qlplsl)'ano camlnO capislrano Franciscan Plaza Shopping c.emr Panting Frandscan Plaza Shoppng Cenler 'Partdrig Strucl1Jre Sbu:ture NORlliBOUNO SOl1Tl1BOUNO EAST1!0UND WEST1lOUND 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL sr SR SU a ET ER EU WL WT WR WU lOTAL 3:00 2 102 0 0 0 104 1 0 1 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 225 3 :15 8 114 0 1 0 89 3 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 225 3:30 8 110 0 0 0 97 4 0 4 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 228 3:45 6 110 0 0 0 97 2 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 220 4:00 PM 5 103 0 0 0 118 1 0 3 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 237 4:15PM 2 119 0 0 0 104 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 232 4:30 PM 2 101 0 0 0 118 2 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 228 4:45PM 8 103 0 0 0 111 1 0 l 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 230 5 :00 PM 4 95 0 0 0 109 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 213 5:1SPM 3 122 0 0 0 115 2 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 248 5:30 PM 7 118 0 0 0 105 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 236 5:45PM 5 102 0 0 0 87 2 0 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 203 6:00 PM 4 119 0 0 0 88 2 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 220 6:15 PM 3 97 0 0 0 94 1 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 199 6:30 PM 4 99 0 0 0 83 1 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 192 )> 6:45PM 1 82 0 0 0 76 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 167 --i --i NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU a ET ER EU WL WT WR WU lOTAL )> 0 TOTAL VOLUMES : n 1696 0 1 0 1595 25 1 17 0 96 0 0 0 0 0 3503 I APPROACH ~·s: 4.07% 95.87% 0.00% 0 .06% 0.00% 98.40% 1.54% 0.06% 15.04% 0.00% 84.96% 0.00% s:: 04:00 PM • 05:00· PM TOTAL rn PEAK.HR VOL: 17 426 0 0 0 451 4 0 4 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 927 z P!AK Hit FACTO I 0.531 0.895 MOO 0.000 0.000 0.956 0.500 0.000 0.333 0.000 0.893 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 .978 --i 0 .91.S 0.948 0.725 N -0 Q) cc CD ->. co .t:. 0 -N co VJ Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services Camino Capistrano & Franciscan Plaza Shopping Center Parking Structure Peak Hour Turning Movement Count ID: 19-01006-004 City: San Juan Capistrano NONE AM 0 0 0 0 0 NONE NOON 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 PM -05:00 PM PM 4 451 0 0 430 AM NOON PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 21 ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 4 .,0 0 0 927 NOON PM 0 0 0 .... 1 0.98 0 0 25 "' 0 0 0 1 0 Day: Saturday Date: 01 /1212019 AM NONE NOON NONE PM 03:00 PM -07:00 PM PM NOON AM 0 '\. 0 0 0 --+---+-- o +-0 0 0 0.,. 0 0 0 --+---+-- 0 c:' 0 0 0 0 0 0 AM NOON PM {!. ,,~tr PM NOON AM 8 c !i "U "' :II i5 ~ "Tl iii :J n iii" n m :J .,, r (/) ::r 0 "a "a :;· ca ~ a Total Vehicles (AM) PM 476 0 17 426 0 PM Total Vehicles (AM) NOON 0 0 0 0 QNOON AM 0 0 0 0 0 AM Total Vehicles (NOON) Total Vehicles (NOON) ./' / Pedestrians (Crosswalks) ' 1r, ~ .t-""8::t :18s.._ 0 <;:) ..-fzc czlL "¥ 0 <;:)~loo o o o ol ~o Total Vehicles (PM) _J., • ~L ~ t. .. ~ .. " ' --·-- NO~~ g • ..~.. • g :ON _A_M_~O~ 0 AM AM Q Q AM NOON 0 t t 0 NOON _J L PM Q .. ~ Q PM .,.~ -;io o o o o or-;--~ t. o~ I z z I~~ (&;a ) 0 'ft.~~~ ~~l.,. ~ : ; 0 ~ -"' <;:) --·-- Total Vehicles (PM) ATTACHMENT 2 , Page 195 of 293 I Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services Driveway In & Out Location: Driveway 3 City: San Juan Capist1 TIME IN Vehlde 3:00PM 16 3:15PM 17 3:30PM 14 3:~SPM 18 4!00PM 9 4:~5PM 9 4:30PM 17 4:45PM 24 S:OOPM 23 5:15PM 18 5:30PM 20 5:45PM 25 6:00PM 27 6;1SPM 23 6:30PM 24 6:45PM 18 Totals 302 Date: 01/12/2019 Day: Saturday OUT TOTAL 0 16 0 17 0 14 0 18 0 9 0 9 0 17 0 24 0 23 0 18 0 20 0 25 0 27 1 24 0 24 0 18 l 303 - ATTACHMENT 2, Page 196 of 293 Prepared by National o.ta a Surveylrw Services Driveway In & Out Location: Driveway 4 City: San Juan Caplst1 T~M·E Vehlqle IN 3:00 P.M 0 3:15PM 0 3:30PM 2 3:45PM 0 4:0PPM 0 4:15PM 0 4:30PM 1 4:45PM 0 S:OOPM 0 5:15PM 1 5:30PM 2 5:45PM 0 6:00PM 1 6:15 P.M 0 6:30 PM 1 6:45PM 0 Totals 8 Date: 01/12/2019 Day: Saturday ou:r TOTAL 18 18 19 19 14 16 9 9 11 Jl 6 6 12 l3 16 16 20 zo 18 19 16 18 25 ZS 24 ZS 22 zz 20 Z1 19 19 Z69 Z77 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 197of293 Prepared by National Data & Surveyln1 Services Driveway In & Out Location: Driveway 5 City: San Juan Capist1 TIME Vehicle IN 3:00~M 15 3:1_5 PM 16 3:30PM 20 3:4SPM 9 4:00PM 10 4:1SPM 6 4:30Pll,1 8 4:4SPM 16 S:OOPM 9 S:lSPM 11 5:30PM 30 5:45PM 25 6:00PM 32 6:15PM 31 6:30PM 27 6:45PM 21 Totals 286 Date: 01/12/2019 Day: Saturday ()UT TOTAL 26 41 25 41 24 44 22 31 26 36 16 22 16 24 22 38 8 17 14 25 14 44 19 44 22 54 18 49 15 42 12 33 299 585 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 198 of 293 ~ () ::::c s: m z -; N '1J Q) co CD ....... <O <O 0 ...... N <O w ..__, Venlueo st Bet. C.mlno C.plstnno/CUl-0.Soc Oly:SanJ..,.~ = -~ ·-.......... ~ DIR liiiilllll. _..._ --a WI .. b . I'll n 1 56 !dSfll •. 3 11 27 ~ ... 6 10 l1 l>8.ffll 6 1 18 . __,.. 13 8 19 lllJS-2 3 18 ....... 7 8 23 4oeSMt I 10 19 -s 8 17 ~n--" a 16 111 -.,.Sl!Ofll -0 2 .. 5'451!11l 1 0 28 ..... 6 3 57 l:ISIM 4 4 24 ... -""~' 8 2 10 4 , 71 -~ 1SJ ~· 410 ~ - ~ 101'Al .. ::,W. ' 36 17.1 19 36 " 20 30 " 1• 36 p 16 22 Q ' 1 ' JO 14 .. IZ 7 13 so 17 16 • 14 11 51 18 17 a 11 26 55 ~ 23 ., S6 20 52 21 35 55 20 " •1 10 m -M11 _ .... .., ____ _ Pedestrian & Bikes Study ~-. -, ~-!!" ·~. ..... '. ---SI TOfAli --. ~ -......:.· -·o L_, ~ __ :.._• ~ 9 n 0 0 0 15 JS 0 0 0 28 U · 0 0 0 11 11 0 0 0 41 so 0 0 0 16 JO. 0 0 2 23 JO 0 2 0 16 JI 0 0 0 19 JJ 0 0 0 3 Z1 0 0 0 13 61 0 0 0 7 41 0 0 0 :zo ·7f 0 1 1 20 41 0 0 0 111 JI 0 0 0 13 n 0 0 0 U2 m 0 .J J --:;-~ . -~ . ~~ "Wl'Al ~ 1 -i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 1 ' 0 0 2 z 0 0 0 0 2 z 0 2 0 0 0 .o 0 0 • u . .. 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 .7 Diis 1/12/2019 .,.,, Solunloy . ·~::~ SS --.. 0 1· 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o· 0 o. 0 1- 0 J 0 0 0 z 0 0 0 J 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Appendix B Vistro Worksheets ATTACHMENT 2, Page 200of293 Generated with Df1HIRI Version 7.00-01 Vistro File: G:\ ... \Existing.vistro Verdugo Street Beautification Project Report File: G:\ ... \Existing Without Project.pdf Scenario: Base Scenario 1/30/2019 Intersection Analysis Summary ID Intersection Name Control Type Method WorstMvmt V/C Delay (s/veh) LOS 1 Camino Capistrano and Two-way stop HCM6th WB Left 0.021 20.9 c Driveway 1 Edition 2 Camino Capistrano and Signalized HCM 6th WBThru 0.493 28.1 c Ortega Highway Edition 3 Camino Capistrano and Signalized HCM 6th NB Left 0 .329 23.0 c Verdugo Street Edition 4 Camino Capistrano and Two-way stop HCM 6th EB Left 0.013 17 .4 c Driveway 2 Edition V/C, Delay, LOS : For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. 1/30/2019 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 201 of 293 Generated with li'lf4il;{.J Versi 7 .00-01 Control Type: Analysis Method: Intersection Level Of Service Report Intersection 1: Camino Capistrano and Drlvew&!f 1 Two-way stop Delay (sec I veh): HCM 6th Edition Level Of Service: Analysis Per1od: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (vie): Intersection Setup Name Camino Capistrano Dri11eway Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Lane Configuration ., ,.. ., ,.. + Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Width [ft] 10.00 12.00 12.00 10.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100 00 100 00 100.00 100 oc, 100 00 100 00 100.00 100 00 Speed [mph) 30.00 30.00 30.00 Grade[%) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crosswalk No No Yes Volumes Name Camino Capistrano Driveway Base Volume Input [veh/h] 35 449 18 1 366 10 11 2 34 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2 .00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Growth Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Site-Generated Trips [veh/h) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [vehlh] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [vehlh) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [vehlh] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 35 449 18 1 366 10 11 2 34 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1 .0000 1 .0000 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total 15-Minute Volume [vehlh] 9 112 4 0 92 3 3 1 9 Total Analysis Volume [vehlh] 35 449 18 1 366 10 11 2 34 Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 113012019 2 Left 12.00 0 100 00 5 1.0000 2.00 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 .0000 1.0000 1 5 20.9 c 0.021 Westbound + Thru 12.00 0 100 00 30 .00 0 .00 Yes 1 1.0000 2.00 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1.0000 1.0000 0 1 0 ATT AC HM ENT 2, Page 202 of 293 Right 12.00 0 100 00 7 1 .0000 2 .00 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 .0000 1.0000 2 7 Generated with l&IHHlrJ•i Version 7 .00-01 Intersection Settings Priority Schema Flared Lana Storage Area (veh) Two-Stage Gap Acceptance Number of Storage Spaces in Median Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results VIC, Movement V/C Ratio 0.03 d_M. Delay for Movement {s/veh) 8 .14 Movement LOS A 95th-Percantile Queue Length (veh/ln) 0.09 95th-Percentile Queue Length (ft/In) 2.29 d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh) Approach LOS d_I, Intersection Delay [s/vah] Intersection LOS 1/30/2019 Free Free 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 0.00 0 00 0 OD 0 00 8 .29 0 00 A A A A 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.57 0.02 A A 3 Stop Stop No No 0 0 No No 0 0 0 00 0.04 0.01 0.05 0.02 0.00 0.01 0 OD 20.39 19.38 11.22 20.86 18.83 11 .35 A c c B c c B 0.00 0 .34 0 .34 0 .34 0 .11 0.11 0.11 0.00 8.48 8.48 8.48 2.86 2.86 2.86 13.72 15.59 B c 1.22 c ATTACHMENT 2, Page 203 of 293 Generated with BtJMl;fej Version 7.00-0 Intersection Level Of Service Report lnteraectlon 2: Camino Capistrano and Ortega Hlgh-y Control Type: Signalized Delay (sec I veh): Analysis Method : HCM 6th Edition Level Of Service: Analysis Period : 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v/c): Intersection Setup Name Camino Capistrano Ortega Highway Approach Northbound Westbound Lene Configuration )r ,, Turning Movement Thru Righi Left Thru Lene Width (ft) 11.00 12.00 11 .00 12 .00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 0 0 0 Pocket Length (ft] 100 00 100 00 100 00 100 00 Speed [mph} 25.00 25 .00 Grade[%) 0.00 0.00 Curb Present No No Crosswalk Yes Yes Volumes Name Camino Capistrano Ortega Highway Base Volume Input (veh/h] 379 118 116 133 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage rlo) 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Growth Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 In-Process Volume [veh/h) 0 0 0 0 Site-Generated Trips [veh/h) 0 0 0 0 Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume (vehlh] 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h) 0 0 0 0 Right-Tum on Red Volume [veh/h) 0 0 0 0 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 379 118 116 133 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total 15-Minute Volume (veh/h] 95 30 29 33 Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 379 118 116 133 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 Local Bus Stopping Rate (/h) 0 0 0 0 v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossin 0 0 v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 11 0 0 v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossin 0 0 v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing r 1 0 0 v_ab, Comer Pedestrian Volume (ped/h) 0 0 Bicycle Volume (bicydeslh) 0 0 1/30/2019 4 28.1 c 0.493 Camino Capistrano Southeastbound '' Left Thru 12.00 12.00 1 0 100.00 100 00 25.00 0.00 No Yes Camino Capistrano 97 310 1.0000 1.0000 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 97 310 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 24 78 97 310 No No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 204 of 293 Generated with llJfJHM•I Version 7 .00-01 lnteraectlon Setting• Located in CBD Signal Coordination Group Cycle Length (s) Coordination Type Actuation Type Offset [s] Offset Reference Permissive Mode Lost time [s] Phaaing & Timing Control Type Signal group Auxiliary Signal Groups Lead I Lag Minimum Green [s] Maximum Green (s) Amber[&) All red [s) Split[s) Vehicle Extension (s) Walk{s) Pedestrian Clearance [s) Rest In Walk 11, Start-Up Lost Time [s) 12, Clearance Lost Time [s) Minimum Recall Maximum Recall Pedestrian Recall Detector Location [ft] Detector Length [ft) I, Upstream Filtering Factor Excluslve Pedestrian Phase Pedestrian Signal Group Pedestrian Walk [s] Pedestrian Clearance (s) 1/30/2019 Overlap Overlap 11 11 9,11 9,11 8 8 58 58 3.6 3 .6 1.0 1.0 63 63 3.5 3.5 5 5 10 10 2.0 2.0 2.6 2.6 No No No No No No 1.0 1.0 6.0 6.0 1.00 1.00 5 No . 1 Time of Day Pattern Coordinated Fully actuated 0.0 LeadGreen SingleBand 0.00 Permissive Permissive Protected Permissive 7 1 7 12 Luac Lead 3 3 3 8 2C 25 20 58 .3 G 3.0 3 .0 3.6 1 0 1.0 1.0 1.0 21 29 24 63 1 5 2.0 1.5 3.5 0 5 0 5 0 10 0 10 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 2 0 2.0 2.0 2.6 No No No No No No No No No 100 0 100.0 1.0 175.0 60 6.0 54.0 6.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 7 18 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 205 of 293 Generated with IB'Jit.fHl4+1 Version 7 . 00-01 Lene Group Calculations Lane Group C, Cycle Length [s] L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s) 11_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 12, Clearance Lost Time (s] g_i, Effective Green Time [s) g IC, Green I Cycle (v I s)_i Volume I Saturation Flow Rate s, saturation flow rate [veh/h) c, Capacity [veh/h) d1, Uniform Delay [s) k, delay calibration I, Upstream Filtering Factor d2, Incremental Delay [s] d3, lnilial Queue Delay (s) Rp, platoon ratio PF, progression factor lane Group Results X, volume I capacity d, Delay for Lane Group (s/veh] Lane Group LOS Crilical Lane Group 5oth-Percentile Queue Length [vehnn) 5oth-Percentile Queue Length [ft/In) 95th-Percentile Queue Length [vehnn] 95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/In) 1130/2019 c R 93 93 4 .60 4.60 0 00 0 00 0.00 0 .00 58 58 0.62 0 .62 0.20 0 .07 1870 1589 1159 986 8.42 7.25 0 .22 0.04 1.00 1.00 0.34 0.02 0 .00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 .33 0.12 8 .76 7.27 A A Yes No 3.51 0.92 87.68 22 .92 6 .31 1.65 157.83 41 .26 6 L c L c 93 93 93 93 4 .00 4.00 4.00 4 .60 0 00 0.00 2.00 0 00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.60 9 9 20 18 0.09 0.09 0.22 0.19 0 .07 0.07 0 .10 0 .17 1781 1870 1004 1870 167 176 174 364 40.84 41.11 42.08 36.19 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.13 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.92 2.49 1.04 6.77 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 0 .69 0.76 0.56 0.85 42.76 43.60 43.12 42.96 D D D D No Yes Yes Yes 2.66 3.09 2.27 7.42 66.52 77.24 56.73 185.62 4 .79 5.56 4.08 11.89 119.74 139.03 102.11 297.33 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 206 of 293 Generated with a JtjMl;{•I Version 7 .00-01 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Reaults d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh) Movement LOS d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh) Approach LOS d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh) Intersection LOS Intersection V/C Other Modes g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s) M_comer, Comer Circulation Area [lt2/ped M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft'/ped d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] l_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for lntersecti1 n Crosswalk LOS s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle Ian~ c_b, Capacity of the bicyde lane [bicycles/I J d_b, Bicycle Delay [s) l_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection Bicycle LOS Sequence 8.76 I 7.27 A I A 8.41 A 11 0 0 00 0 00 50 00 2-204 8 2000 0 0.50 4.952 E 1/3012019 7 42.76 I 43.60 43.12 I 42.96 D I D D I D 43.21 43.00 D D 28.13 c 0.493 11 0 11 0 0 00 0 00 0 OD 0 00 50 00 50 00 2 377 2 203 B 6 2000 2000 0 0 0.50 0.50 4.543 4.804 E E ATTACHMENT 2, Page 207 of 293 Generated with lmtJHl:J•) Version 7 .00-01 Intersection Level Of Servi~ Report Intersection 3: Camino Capistrano and Verdugo Slnlet Control Type: Signalized Delay (sec I veh): Analysis Method : HCM 6th Edition Level Of Service: Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (vie): Intersection Setup Name Csmino Csplstrano Approach Northbound Southbound Lane Configuration ,, I- Tuming Movement Left Thru Thru Right Lane Width [ft] 11 .00 12.00 12.00 12.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 1 0 0 0 Pocket Length [fl] 150.00 100 OD 100 OD ·oD OD Speed (mph] 25 .00 25.00 Grade[%] 0 .00 0 .00 Curb Present No No Crosswalk Yes No Volumes Name Camino Cspistrano Base Volume Input [veh/h] 64 383 399 71 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2 .00 2.00 Growth Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume (veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Right-Tum on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 64 383 399 71 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total 15-Minute Volume (veh/h] 16 96 100 18 Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 64 383 399 71 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate (/h] 0 0 0 0 Local Bus Stopping Rate (/h] 0 0 0 0 v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossin I 0 0 v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing h 0 0 v_a>, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossin I 0 0 v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing r ~i 0 0 v_ab, Comer Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 113012019 8 23.0 c 0.329 Verdugo Street Eastbound , ... Left Right 12.00 12.00 1 0 120.00 10D DO 25.00 0.00 No Yes Verdugo Street 63 44 1.0000 1 .0000 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 44 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 16 11 63 44 No No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 208 of 293 Generated with lllltJhlfl•i Version 7.00-01 lntensection Settings Located in CBD Signal Coordination Group Cycle Length [s) Coordination Type Actuation Type Offset (s) Offset Reference Permissive Mode Lost time [s] Phasing & Timing Control Type Signal group Auxiliary Signal Groups Lead/ Lag Minimum Green [s] Maximum Green [s] Amber(s) All red [s] Split[s) Vehicle Extension [s) Walk[s) Pedestrian Clearance [s) Rest In Walk 11, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 12, Clearance Lost Time (s) Minimum Recall Maximum Recall Pedestrian Recall Detector Location [ft) Detector Length [ft) I, Upstream Filtering Factor Exclusive PedHtrian Phase Pedestrian Signal Group Pedestrian Walk (s) Pedestrian Clearance (s] 1/30/201g Protected Permissive 3 11 Lead 3 8 20 58 3.0 3.6 1.0 1.0 24 63 1.5 3 .5 0 5 0 10 2 .0 2 .0 2 .0 2 .6 No No No No No No 1.0 135.0 54.0 6 .0 1.00 1 .00 No . 1 Time of Day Pattern Coordinated Fully actuated 0.0 LeadGreen SingleBand 0.00 Permissive Permissive Permissive Permissive 12 0 9 0 Lead 8 0 3 0 58 0 25 0 3.6 0 0 3.0 0 0 1.0 00 1.0 00 63 0 29 0 3.5 0 0 2.0 00 5 0 5 0 10 0 10 0 2 .0 00 2.0 00 2 .6 00 2.0 00 No No No No No No 1.0 00 1.0 0 0 6.0 00 6.0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 7 18 9 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 209 of 293 Generated with lilltlLihJ•I Version 7 .00-01 Lane Group Calculatlone Lane Group C, Cyde Length [s) L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 11_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 12, Clearance Lost Time [s) g_i, Effective Green Time (s) g I C, Green I Cycle (v I s)_i Volume I Saturation Flow Rate s, saturation flow rate [vehlh) c, Capacity (veh/h] d1, Uniform Delay (s) k, delay calibration I, Upstream Filtering Factor d2, Incremental Delay [s) d3, lnnial Queue Delay [s] Rp, platoon ratio PF, progression fector Lane Group Results X, volume I capacity d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] Lane Group LOS Critical Lane Group 5oth-Percentile Queue Length [vehlln] 50th-Percenlile Queue Length [fl/In) 95th-Percentile Queue Length [vehlln) 95th-Percentile Queue Length [Mn) 1/30/2019 L c 59 59 4.00 4.60 0 00 0 00 2.00 2.60 3 18 0 .05 0.31 0.04 0.20 1781 1870 83 576 27.82 17.77 0.04 0.13 1.00 1.00 5.47 1.60 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.77 0.67 33.29 19.38 c B Yes No 0.99 4.43 24.64 110.83 1.77 7.89 44.34 197.15 c L R 59 59 59 4.60 4.00 4 .00 0 00 0 00 0 00 2.60 2 .00 2.00 18 3 3 0.31 0 .06 0 .06 0.26 0.04 0.03 1821 1781 1589 561 105 94 19.05 27.09 28.88 0.13 0 .04 0 .04 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.10 2 .04 1.35 0.00 0.00 0 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.84 0.60 0.47 23.14 29.13 28.23 c c c Yes Yes No 6.13 0.89 0.61 153.29 22.28 15.29 10.19 1.60 1.10 254.81 40.11 27.53 10 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 210 of 293 Generated with lllfjil#ei Version z .00-01 Movement, Approach, & lntenactlon Reaulta d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] Movement LOS d_A, Approach Delay (&lveh) Approach LOS d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] Intersection LOS Intersection VIC Other Modes g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk lime [s) M_comer, Comer Circulation Area [ftZ/ped M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft'/ped d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] l_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for lntersecti1 n Crosswalk LOS s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle Ian c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/I ) d_b, Bicycle Delay [s) l_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection Bicycle LOS Sequence 33.29 I 19.38 c I B 21.37 c 11 0 0 00 0 00 50 00 2 19$ B 2000 0 0.50 4.870 E 1/30/2019 11 23.14 -, 23.14 29.13 I 28.23 c l c c I c 23.14 28.76 c c 22.96 c 0 .329 00 11 0 0 00 0 DO 0 00 0 00 0 00 50 00 0 000 2 020 F B 2000 2000 0 0 0.50 0.50 4.908 4.132 E D ATTACHMENT 2, Page 211of293 Generated with llJH~ilRel Version 7.00-01 Control Type: Intersection Level Of Seivlce Report Intersection 4: Camino Capistrano and Driveway 2 Two-way stop Delay (sec I veh): Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition Level Of Service: Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v/c): Intersection Setup Name Camino Capistrano Approach Northbound Southbound Lane Configuration ., I ,.. Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Lane Width [ft] 11 .00 12 .00 12 .00 12.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 1 0 0 0 Pocket Length [ft] 80 .00 1C1C 00 '00 00 ·,oo oo Speed[mph] 25 .00 25.00 Grade[%] 0.00 0.00 Crosswalk No No Volumes Name Camino Capistrano Base Volume Input [veh/h] 17 426 451 4 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage r10] 2.00 2.00 2 .00 2.00 Growth Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Site-Generated Trips (veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h) 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 17 426 451 4 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total 15-Minute Volume (veh/h] 4 107 113 1 Total Analysis Volume (vehlh] 17 426 451 4 Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 113012019 12 Left 12.00 0 :oo 00 4 1.0000 2.00 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1.0000 1.0000 1 4 17.4 c 0 .013 Driveway Eastbound T 25.00 0.00 Yes Driveway 0 Right 12.00 0 '00 GO 25 1.0000 2.00 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 1.0000 1.0000 6 25 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 212 of 293 Generated with IB'Jl!ihl4•1 Version 7 . -01 Intersection Settings Priority Scheme Flared Lane Storage Area [veh] T~tage Gap Acceptance Number of Storage Spaces in Median Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results V/C, Movement VIC Ratio d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] Movement LOS 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln) 95th-Percentile Queue Length [filln] d_A, Approach Delay [slveh] Approach LOS d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh) Intersection LOS 1/30/2019 Free 0 0 0.02 0 00 8.31 0 00 A A 0.05 0.00 1.17 0.00 0.32 A Free Stop No 0 0 No 0 0 0.00 0 00 0.01 0 .04 0 00 0 00 17.43 11 .32 A A c B 0.00 0 .00 0.17 0 .17 0.00 0.00 4.32 4.32 0.00 12.17 A B 0 .53 c 13 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 213of293 Generated with Biijilt@ Version 7.00-01 Verdugo Street Beautification Project Vistro File: G:\ ... \Existing.vistro Report File: G:\ ... \Existing With Project.pdf ID Intersection Name 1 Camino Capistrano and Driveway 1 2 Camino Capistrano and Ortega Highway 3 Camino Capistrano and Verdugo Street 4 Camino Capistrano and Driveway2 Intersection Analysis Summary Control TYpe Method Worst Mvmt Two-way stop HCM 6th WB Left Edition Signalized HCM 6th WB Thru Edition Signalized HCM 6th NB Left Edition Two-way stop HCM 6th EB Left Edition Scenario 1 Existing With Project 1/30/2019 VIC Delay (s/veh) LOS 0.021 20.9 c 0.493 28.1 c 0.357 24.0 c 0.013 17.4 c V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. 1/3012019 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 214 of 293 Generated with 111Jl1MIR•I Version 7 .00·01 Control Type: Analysis Method: Intersection Level Of Service Report Intersection 1: Camino Caplatrano and Driveway 1 Two-way stop Delay (sec I veh): HCM 6th Edition Level Of Service: Analysis Period : 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (vie): lntersecUon Setup Nama Camino Capistrano Driveway Approaeh Northbound Southbound Eastbound Lane Configuration ..... ..... + Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Width [fl) 10.00 12.00 12.00 10.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12 .00 No. of Lanes In Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Pocket Length (fl) 100.00 100 00 100 00 100.00 100 00 100 00 100 00 100 00 100 00 Speed[mph) 30.00 30.00 30.00 Grade[%) 0.00 0 .00 0.00 Crosswalk No No Yes Volumes Name Camino Capistrano Driveway Base Volume Input (veh/h] 35 449 16 1 366 10 11 2 34 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage[%] 2 .00 2.00 2 .00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Growth Factor 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 In-Process Volume [veh/h) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Diverted Trips [veh/h) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips (veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume fveh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume (veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Hourly Volume (veh/h) 35 449 16 1 366 10 11 2 34 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 9 112 4 0 92 3 3 1 9 Total Analysis Volume [veh/h) 35 449 16 1 366 10 11 2 34 Pedestrian Volume (ped/h] 0 0 0 1/30/2019 2 Left 12.00 0 !00 00 5 1.0000 2.00 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1.0000 1.0000 1 5 20 .9 c 0.021 Westbound + Thru 12 .00 0 100 00 30.00 0.00 Yes 1 1.0000 2.00 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1.0000 1.0000 0 1 0 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 215 of 293 Right 12.00 0 100 00 7 1.0000 2.00 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1.0000 1.0000 2 7 Generated with lllifJHl;lei Version 7 .00-01 lnterHctlon Settings Priority Scheme Flared lane Storage Area (veh] Two-Stage Gap Acceptance Number of Storage Spaces in Median Movement, Approach, & lntel"8ectlon Rnults V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0 .03 d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 8 .14 Movement LOS A 95th-Percentile Queue Lenglh [veh/ln] 0 .09 95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/In] 2 .29 d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] Approach LOS d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh) Intersection LOS 1130/2019 Free Free 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 0.00 0 00 0 00 0 00 8.29 0 00 A A A A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0 .00 0.07 0 .00 0 .57 0 .02 A A 3 Stop Stop No No 0 0 No No 0 a 0 00 0 .04 0.01 0.05 0 .02 0 .00 0 .01 0 00 20.39 19.38 11.22 20.86 18.83 11 .35 A c c B c c B 0.00 0 .34 0 .34 0.34 0 .11 0.11 0 .11 0.00 8.48 8.48 8 .48 2 .86 2.86 2.86 13.72 15.59 B c 1.22 c ATTACHMENT 2, Page 216 of 293 Generated with Di%il¥el Version 7.00-01 Intersection Level Of Service Report Intersection 2: Camino Capistrano and Ortega Highway Control Type: Signalized Delay (sec I veh): Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition Level Of Service: Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v/c): lnternction Setup Name Camino Capistrano Ortega Highway Approach Northbound Westbound Lane Configuration )r ,, Turning Movement Thru Right Left Thru Lane Width (ft] 11.00 12.00 11.00 12.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 0 0 0 Pocket Length [ft) 1Q:JOO 1(0 00 iOC GO 100 00 Speed [mph) 25.00 25.00 Grade[%] 0.00 0.00 Curb Present No No Crosswalk Yes Yes Volumes Name Camino Capistrano Ortega Highway Base Volume Input [vehlh] 379 118 116 133 Ba&e Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehides Percentage (o/o) 2.00 2 .00 2 .00 2.00 Growth Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 In-Process Volume (vehlh] 0 0 0 0 Site-Generated Trips [vehlh] 0 0 0 0 Diverted Trips (vehlh) 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h) 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [vehlh] 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [vehlh] 0 0 0 0 Right-Tum on Red Volume [vehlh) 0 0 (J 0 Total Hourly Volume (vehlh) 379 118 116 133 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 95 30 29 33 Total Analysis Volume (veh/h] 379 118 118 133 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate (lh) 0 0 0 0 Local Bus Stopping Rate (lh) 0 0 0 0 v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossin 0 0 v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing i 0 0 v_rill, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossin 0 0 v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossng r i 0 0 v_ab, Comer Pedestrian Volume [ped/h) 0 0 Bicycle Volume [bicydeslh] 0 0 1/30/2019 4 28.1 c 0.493 Camino Capistrano Southeastbound '' Left Thru 12.00 12.00 1 0 100.00 10C OC 25.00 0.00 No Yes Camino Capistrano 97 310 1.0000 1.0000 2 .00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 97 310 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 24 78 97 310 No No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 217of293 Generated with llJflfiiiel Version 7.00-01 lnterHCtlon Settings Located in CBD Signal Coordination Group Cyde Length [s] Coordination Type Actuation Type Offset [s] Olfaet Reference Permissive Mode Lost time (s] Phasing & Timing Control Type Signal group Auxiliary Signal Groups Lead I Lag Minimum Green [s) Maximum Green [s] Amber[s] All rad [s] Split(s] Vehicle Extension [s) Walk[s] Pedestrian Clearance [s) Rest In Walk 11, Start-Up Lost Time [s) 12, Clearance Lost Time (s] Minimum Recall Maximum Recall Pedestrian Recall Detector Location (rt) Detector Length (fl] I, Upstream Filtering Factor Excluslve Pedestrian Phase Pedestrian Signal Group Pedestrian Walk [s] Pedestrian Clearance [s] 1/30/2019 OVertap Overlap 11 11 9,11 9,11 8 8 58 58 3 .6 3.6 1.0 1.0 63 63 3.5 3.5 5 5 10 10 2.0 2.0 2 .6 2.6 No No No No No No 1.0 1.0 6.0 6.0 1.00 1.00 No . 1 Time of Dey Pattern Coordinated Fully actuated 0.0 LeadGreen Single Band 0.00 Permissive Permissive Protected Permissive 7 1 7 12 Lt:acJ Lead 3 3 3 8 20 25 20 58 30 3 .0 3.0 3.6 '1 0 1.0 1.0 1.0 24 29 24 63 l 5 2.0 1.5 3.5 I 5 0 $ 0 10 0 'O 2 0 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 2.6 No No No No No No No No No 100 0 100.0 1.0 175.0 60 6.0 54 .0 6.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 7 18 5 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 218 of 293 Generated with DMi~iiiij Version 7.00-01 Lane Group Calculations Lane Group C, Cycle Length (s) L, Total Lost Time per Cycle (s) 11_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time (s) 12, Clearance Lost Time (s) g_i, Effective Green Time (s) g IC, Green I Cycle (v I s)_i Volume I Saturation Flow Rate s, saturation flow rate [veh/h) c, Capacity [veh/h) d1, Uniform Delay (s) k, delay calibration I, Upstream Filtering Factor d2, Incremental Delay [s] d3, Initial Queue Delay (s) Rp, platoon ratio PF, progression factor Lane Group Results X, volume I capacity d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] Lane Group LOS Critical Lane Group SO!h-Percentile Queue Length (veh/ln) soth-Percentile Queue Length (ft/In) 95111-Percentile Queue Length (veh/ln) 95111-Percentile Queue Length (Mn) 1/3012019 c R 93 93 4.60 4.60 0 00 0 00 0.00 0.00 58 58 0.62 0.62 0.20 0.07 1870 1589 1159 986 8.42 7.25 0.22 0.04 1.00 1.00 0.34 0.02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.12 8.76 7.27 A A Yes No 3.51 0.92 87.68 22.92 6.31 1.65 157.83 41.26 6 L c L c 93 93 93 93 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.60 0 00 0 00 2.00 0 00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.60 9 9 20 18 0.09 0.09 0.22 0.19 0.07 0.07 0.10 0.17 1781 1870 1004 1870 167 176 174 364 40.84 41.11 42.08 36.19 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.13 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.92 2.49 1.04 6.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.69 0.76 0.56 0.85 42.76 43.60 43.12 42.96 D 0 0 0 No Yes Yes Yes 2.66 3.09 2.27 7.42 66.52 77.24 56.73 185.62 4.79 5.56 4.08 11.89 119.74 139.03 102.11 297.33 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 219of293 Generated with liill'JHlf{il Version 7.00-01 Movement, Approach, & lnterHCtlon RHults d_M, Delay for Movement [s/Veh) Movement LOS d...}i, Approach Delay [a/veh] Approach LOS d_I, lnlanlection Delay [slveh] Intersection LOS Intersection VIC Other Modes g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time (s] M_comer, Comer Circulation Area [ft'/ped M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area (fP/ped d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] l_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for lntersectic h Crosswalk LOS s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle Ian• c_b, Capacity of Iha bicycle lane [blcycle9/l ~ d_b, Bicycle Delay [s) l_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection Bicycle LOS Sequence 8.78 I 7.27 A I A 8.41 A 11 0 0 00 0 00 50 00 2 204 8 2000 0 0.50 4.952 E 1/30/2019 7 42.76 I 43.60 43.12 I 42.96 D I D D I D 43.21 43.00 D D 28.13 c 0.493 11 0 11 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 50 DC 50 00 2 377 2 203 B B 2000 2000 0 0 0.50 0.50 4.543 4.804 E E ATTACHMENT 2, Page 220 of 293 Generated wtth lilJl•1~iitJ•I Version 7.00-01 Intersection Level Of Service Report lnteraectlon 3: Camino Capistrano and Verdugo Street Control Type: Signalized Delay (sec I veh): Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition Level Of Service: Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v/c): lnterHction Setup Name Camino Capistrano Approach Northbound Southbound Lane Configuration ,, Jot Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Lane Width [ft) 11.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 No. of Lanes In Pocket 1 0 0 0 Pocket Length [ft] 150.00 100 00 100 OD 100 OD Speed(mph) 25.00 25.00 Grade[%] 0.00 0 .00 Curb Present No No Crosswalk Yes No Volumes Name Camino Capistrano Base Volume Input [veh/h] 64 383 399 71 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage rto] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2 .00 Growth Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Site-Generated Trips (veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Diverted Trips [veh/h) 0 0 0 0 PasH>y Trips (vehlh] 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [vehlh) 0 0 0 0 Right-Tum on Red Volume (vehlh) 0 0 0 0 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h) 64 383 399 71 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1 .0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total 15-Minute Volume (veh/h) 16 96 100 18 Total Analysis Volume [vehlh) 64 383 399 71 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h) 0 0 0 0 Local Bus Stopping Rate [lh) 0 0 0 0 v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossin 1 0 D v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing n 0 0 v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossin I 0 0 v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 1 ~i 0 0 v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h) 0 0 Bicycle Volume (bicycles/h) 0 0 1/30/2019 8 24.0 c 0.357 Verdugo Street Eastbound T Left Right 12.00 12.00 0 0 100 OD ·oc oo 25.00 0.00 No Yes Verdugo Street 63 44 1.0000 1.0000 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 44 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 16 11 63 44 No No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 221 of 293 Generated with D+ih'B•I Version 7 .00-01 lnten1ectlon Settings Located in CBD Signal Coordination Group Cycle Length [s) Coordination Type Actuation Type Offset [s] Offset Reference Permissive Mode Lost time [s] Phasing & Timing Control Type Signal group Auxiliary Signal Groups Lead I Leg Minimum Green [s] Maximum Green [s] Amber[s) All red [s] Split[s] Vehicle Extension [s] Walk [s] Pedestrian Clearance (s] Rest In Walk 11, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 12, Clearance Lost Time [s] Minimum Recall Maximum Recall Pedestrian Recall Detector Location (ft] Detector Length [ft] I, Upstream Filtering Factor Excluslve Pedestrian Phase Pedestrian Signal Group Pedestrian Walk [s] Pedestrian Clearance [s) 113012019 Protected Permissive 3 11 Lead 3 8 20 58 3.0 3 .6 1.0 1.0 24 83 1.5 3.5 0 5 0 10 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.6 No No No No " No No 00 0 0 00 0 0 1.00 1.00 No . 1 Time of Day Pattern Coordinated Fully actuated 0.0 LeadGreen SingleBand 0.00 Permissive Permissive Permissive Permissive 12 u 9 0 Lead 8 0 3 c 58 0 25 0 3 .6 Ou 3 .0 00 1.0 0 0 1.0 DO 63 0 29 0 3.5 0 0 2 .0 00 s 0 s 0 10 0 10 0 2 .0 0 0 2 .0 00 2 .6 0 0 2 .0 00 No No No No No No 1.0 00 00 0 0 6.0 0 0 00 0 0 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 10 7 18 9 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 222 of 293 Generated with llllf111Rei Version 7 .00-01 Lane Group Calculations Lane Group C, Cycle Length [s] L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s) 11_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s) 12, Clearance Lost Time (s) g_i, Effective Green Time (s) g IC, Green I Cycle (v I s)_i Volume I Saturation Flow Rate s, saturation flow rate [veh/h) c, Capacity [veh/h) d1, Uniform Delay (s) k, delay calibration I, Upstream Filtering Factor d2, Incremental Delay [s) d3, Initial Queue Delay [s) Rp, platoon ratio PF, progression factor Lane Group Results X, volume I capacity d, Deley for Lane Group [s/veh) Lane Group LOS Critical Lene Group 501h-Percenlile Queue Length [veh/ln] 501h-Percentile Queue Length [ft/In) 95th-Percentile Queue Length (veh/ln] 95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/In) 1130/2019 L 61 4.00 0 00 2.00 3 0.05 0.04 1781 82 28.82 0.04 1.00 5.84 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.78 34.66 c Yes 1.03 25.73 1.85 46.31 c c c 61 61 61 4.60 4.60 4.00 0 00 0 00 0 00 2.60 2.60 2.00 19 19 5 0.31 0.31 0.08 0.20 0.26 0.06 1870 1821 1697 572 557 138 18.50 19.83 27.50 0.13 0.13 0.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.65 4.29 3.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.67 0.84 0.77 20.15 24.12 30.97 c c c No Yes Yes 4.65 6.43 1.61 116.16 160.76 40.16 8.18 10.59 2.89 204.53 264.73 72.28 10 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 223 of 293 Generated with lii'IHHl#d Version 7 .00-01 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results d_M, Delay for Movement [slveh] Movement LOS d_A, Approach Oelay [slveh] Approach LOS d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] Intersection LOS Intersection VIC Other Modes g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk nme [s] M_comer, Comer Circulation Area [112/pell: M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [112/ped d_p, Pedestrian Oelay [s] l_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for lntersectic n Crosswalk LOS s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle Ian 1 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/I ] d_b, Bicycle Delay [s) l_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection Bicycle LOS Sequence 34.66 I 20.15 c I c 22.23 c 11 0 0 00 0 00 50 00 2 195 6 2000 0 0.50 4.870 E 1130/2019 11 24.12 I 24.12 30.97 I 30.97 c I c c I c 24.12 30.97 c c 24.01 c 0.357 00 11 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 50 00 0 000 ; 821 F p 2000 2000 0 0 0.50 0.50 4.908 4.309 E E ATTACHMENT 2, Page 224 of 293 Generated with lill@Hlr{+J Version 7.00-01 Control Type: Intersection Level Of Service Report Intersection 4: Camino Capistrano and Driveway 2 Two-way stop Delay (sec I veh): Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition Level Of Service: Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v/c): Intersection Setup Name Camino Capistrano Approach Northbound Southbound Lene Configuration .,, f-. Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Lane Width [ft] 11.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 1 0 0 0 Pocket Length (ft] 80.00 ·100 00 100 OD 100 00 Speed [mph] 25.00 25.00 Grade[%) 0.00 0.00 Crosswalk No No Volumes Name Camino Capistrano Base Volume Input [veh/h) 17 426 451 4 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehides Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Growth Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 In-Process Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 0 Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h) 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [vehlh] 0 0 0 0 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 17 426 451 4 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 4 107 113 1 Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 17 426 451 4 Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 1/30/2019 12 Left 12.00 0 100 00 4 1.0000 2.00 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1.0000 1.0000 1 4 17.4 c 0.013 Driveway Eastbound T 25.00 0.00 Yes Driveway 0 Right 12.00 0 100 00 25 1.0000 2.00 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 1.0000 1.0000 6 25 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 225 of 293 Generated with lilJfJ@ii;lel Version 7.00-01 lnte11M1Ctlon Settings Priority Scheme Flared lane Storage Area (vehJ Two-SmgeGapAccepmnce Number of Storage Spaces in Median Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results VIC, Movement V/C Ratio d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh) Movement LOS 95th-Percenlile Queue Length [veh/ln) 95th-Percentile Queue Length [ftlln] d_A, Approach Delay (s/veh] Approach LOS d_I, intersection Delay (s/veh) Intersection LOS 1/30/2019 Free 0 0 0.02 0 00 8.31 0 00 A A 0 .05 0 .00 1.17 0 .00 0 .32 A Free Stop No 0 0 No 0 0 0 00 0 00 0.01 0 .04 0 ()0 0 00 17.43 11 .32 A A c B 0.00 0 .00 0.17 0 .17 0.00 0 .00 4 .32 4 .32 0 .00 12.17 A B 0.53 c 13 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 226 of 293 Generated with lmitJHi;J•j Version 7.00-01 Vistro File: G:\ ... \Existing.vistro Verdugo Street Beautification Project Report File: G:\ .. .\Year 2020 With Project.pdf Scenario 2 Year 2020 With Project 1/30/2019 Intersection Analysis Summary ID Intersection Name Control Type Method WorstMvmt V/C Delay (s/veh) LOS 1 Camino Capistrano and Two-way stop HCM6th WB Left 0.023 22.2 c Driveway 1 Edition 2 Camino Capistrano and Signalized HCM 6th SEB Left 0.518 28.9 c Ortega Highway Edition 3 Camino Capistrano and Signalized HCM 6th NB Left 0.375 24.4 c Verdugo Street Edition 4 Camino Capistrano and Two-way stop HCM 6th EB Left 0.014 18.3 c Driveway2 Edition V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. 1/30/2019 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 227 of 293 Generated with li&IMiHIR•I Version 7.00-01 Control Type: Analysis Method: Intersection Level Of Service Report Intersection 1: Camino Capistrano and Driveway 1 Two-way stop Delay (sec I veh): HCM 6th Edition Level Of Service: Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v/c): Intersection Setup Name Camino Capistrano Driveway Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Lane Configuration ,,.. ,,.. + Tuming Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Width (ft] 10.00 12.00 12.00 10.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 Q 0 Pocket Length [ft) 100.00 10(J co 100 00 100.00 1on OD 100 00 >DO 00 100 00 100 uo Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00 Grade(%) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crosswalk No No Yes Volumes Name Camino Capislrano Driveway Base Volume Input [veh/h] 35 449 16 1 366 10 11 2 34 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage[%] 2 .00 2.00 2 .00 2.00 2 .00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2 .00 Growth Factor 1 .05 1.05 1 .05 1.05 1 .05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 In-Process Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Site-Generated Trips [veh/h) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Diverted Trips (veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips (vehlh] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume (vehlh) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 37 471 17 1 384 11 12 2 36 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total 15-Minute Volume (veh/h) 9 118 4 0 98 3 3 1 9 Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 37 471 17 1 384 11 12 2 36 Pedestrian Volume [ped/h) 0 0 0 1/30/2019 2 Left 12.00 0 100 00 5 1.0000 2.00 1.05 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1.0000 1.0000 1 5 22.2 c 0.023 Westbound + Thru 12.00 c 100 00 30.00 0.00 Yes 1 1.0000 2.00 1.05 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1.0000 1.0000 0 1 0 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 228 of 293 Right 12.00 0 lOC 00 7 1.0000 2.00 1 .05 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1.0000 1.0000 2 7 Generated with lillMif.iis(•j Version 7.00-01 Intersection Settings Priority Scheme Flared Lane Storage Area (veh) Two-Stage Gap Acceptance Number of Storage Spaces in Median Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results VIC, Movement VIC Ratio 0.03 d_M, Delay for Movement (&/veh) 8.20 Movement LOS A 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln) 0.10 95th-Percentile Queue Length [fl/In) 2.46 d_A, Approach Delay (s/veh] Approach LOS d_I, Intersection Delay [slveh) Intersection LOS 1/30/2019 Free Free 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 0 .00 0 00 0 00 0 00 8 .35 0 00 A A A A 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.58 0 .02 A A 3 Stop Stop No No 0 0 No No 0 0 0 00 0.05 0.01 0.05 0.02 0.00 0.01 0 00 21.66 20 .44 11 .53 22.18 19.76 11.58 A c c B c c B 0.00 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.00 9.63 9.63 9.63 3.05 3.05 3.05 14.32 16.29 B c 1.26 c ATTACHMENT 2, Page 229 of 293 Generated with Dll!hlitJ•j Version 7 .00-01 lnterseCUon Level Of Service Report Intersection 2: Camino Capistrano and Ortega Highway Control Type: Signalized Delay (sec I veh): Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition Level Of Service: Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (vie): Intersection Setup Name Camino Capistrano Ortega Highway Approach Northbound Westbound Lane Configuration 'r ,, Turning Movement Thru Right Left Thru Lane Width [ft) 11.00 12.00 11.00 12.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 0 0 0 Pocket Length (ft) 100 00 100 00 100 00 100 00 Speed(mph) 25.00 25.00 Grade(%] 0 .00 0.00 Curb Present No No Crosswalk Yes Yes Volumea Name Camino Capistrano Ortega Highway Base Volume Input (veh/h) 379 118 116 133 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage r.<.J 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Growth Factor 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 In-Process Volume (veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Sita-Generated Trips (veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Diverted Trips (veh/h) 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips (veh/h) 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume (veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Other Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 0 Right-Tum on Red Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 0 Total Hourly Volume (veh/h) 398 124 122 140 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total 1 S-Minute Volume (veh/h] 100 31 31 35 Total Analysis Volume [vehlh] 398 124 122 140 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h) 0 0 0 0 Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h) 0 0 0 0 v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossin 1 0 0 v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 111 0 0 v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crosain 1 0 0 v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing r I 0 0 v_ab, Comer Pedestrian Volume [ped/h) 0 0 Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h) 0 0 1/30/2019 4 28.9 c 0.518 Camino Capistrano Southeastbound '' Left Thru 12.00 12.00 1 0 100.00 100 00 25.00 0 .00 No Yes Camino Capistrano 97 310 1.0000 1.0000 2.00 2 .00 1.05 1.05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 102 326 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 26 82 102 326 No No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 230 of 293 Generated with lli?lij"il¢•J Version 7.00-01 Intersection Settings Located in CBD Signal Coordination Group Cycle Length [s] Coordination Type Actuation Type Offset (s] Offset Reference Permissive Mode Lost time (s] Phasing & Timing Control Type Signal group Auxiliary Signal Groups Lead I Lag Minimum Green [s] Maximum Green (s] Amber[s] All red (s] Split[s] Vehicle Extension (s] Walk(s] Pedestrian Clearance (s] Rest In Walk 11, Start-Up Lost Time (s] 12, Clearance Lost Time (s] Minimum Recall Maximum Recall Pedestrian Recall Detector Location [ft] Detector Length (ft] I, Upstream Filtering Factor Exclusive Pedestrian Phase Pedestrian Signal Group Pedestrian Walk (s] Pedestrian Clearance (s] 113012019 Overlap Overlap 11 11 9,11 9,11 8 8 58 58 3.6 3.6 1.0 1.0 63 63 3.5 3.5 5 5 10 10 2.0 2.0 2.6 2.6 No No No No No No 1.0 1.0 6.0 6.0 1.00 1.00 5 No - 1 Time of Day Pattern Coordinated Fully actuated 0.0 Lead Green SingleBand 0.00 Permissive Permissive Protected Permissive 7 1 7 12 Lead Lead 3 3 3 8 2G 25 20 58 3 0 3.0 3.0 3.6 1 0 1.0 1.0 1.0 24 29 24 63 ·1 5 2.0 1.5 3.5 0 5 0 5 0 10 0 10 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 2 0 2.0 2.0 2.6 No No No No No No No No No moo 100.0 1.0 175.0 60 6.0 54.0 6.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 7 18 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 231of293 Generated with lilldHl:J•I Version 7.00-01 Lane Group Calculations Lane Group C, Cycle Length [s] L, Total Lost Tune per Cycle [s] 11_1), Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 12, Clearance Lost Time[&] g_i, Effective Green Time [s] g IC, Green I Cycle (v I s)_i Volume I Saturation Flow Rate s. saturation flow rate [veh/h] c, Capacity [veh/h] d1, Uniform Delay [s] k, delay celibration I, Upstream Filtering Factor d2, lncrementel Delay [s] d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] Rp, platoon ratio PF, progression fador Lane Group Results X, volume I cepacity d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] lane Group LOS Critical Lane Group 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veMn] 50th-Percentile Queue Leng1h [fl/In] 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 95th-Percentile Queue Length (fl/In] 1130/2019 c R 95 95 4.60 4.60 0 00 0 00 0.00 0.00 60 60 0.62 0 .62 0.21 0.08 1870 1589 1168 993 8.56 7 .31 0.27 0 .04 1.00 1.00 0.44 0.02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.34 0.12 9.00 7 .33 A A Yes No 3.83 0 ,99 95.86 24.70 6.90 1.78 172.56 44 .47 6 L c L c 95 95 95 95 4 .00 4 .00 4 .00 4 .60 0 00 0 00 2.00 0 00 2.00 2 .00 2.00 2.60 9 9 20 19 0 .10 0 .10 0 .21 0 .20 0 .07 0.07 0.10 0 .17 1781 1870 986 1870 173 182 160 379 41.83 42.12 44.41 36.82 0 .04 0 .04 0.04 0 .13 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.96 2.59 1.57 6.89 0.00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.70 0.77 0.64 0.86 43.79 44.71 45.98 43.71 D D 0 0 No Yes Yes Yes 2 .88 3.35 2.50 8 .03 72.06 83 .81 62.59 200.75 5.19 6 .03 4 .51 12.68 129.71 150.86 112 .67 316.93 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 232 of 293 Generated with D@HW•I Version 7.00-01 Movement, Approach, & lnterwectlon Raaults d_M, Delay for Movement [slveh) Movement LOS d_A, Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS d_I, Intersection Delay [slveh] lnlelsection LOS Intersection VIC Other Modes g_Walk,mi, Etrective Walk llme (s) M_comer, Comer Circulation Area (fl'Jped M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area (ft'/ped d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s) IJ>,int, Pedesbian LOS Score for lntersectic n Crosswalk LOS s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle Ian c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/I ) d_b, Bicycle Delay [s) l_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection Bicycle LOS Sequence 9.00 I 7.33 A I A 8 .60 A 11 .0 0 00 0 00 50 00 2 217 B 2000 0 0.50 4.994 E 113012019 7 43.79 I 44.71 45.98 I 43.71 D I D D I D 44.28 44.25 D D 28.90 c 0.518 11 0 11 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 50 00 50 00 2 389 2 216 B B 2000 2000 0 0 0.50 0.50 4.585 4.839 E E ATTACHMENT 2, Page 233 of 293 Generated with llmfJll#el Versl n 7 .00-01 Intersection Level Of Service Report Intersection 3: Camino Capistrano and Verdugo Street Control Type: Signalized Delay (sec I veh): Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition Level Of Service: Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v/c): Intersection Setup Name Camino Capistrano Approach Northbound Southbound Lane Configuration ., I I- Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Lane Width (ft] 11.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 1 0 0 0 Pocket Length [ft] 150.00 10Q OD 100 DO 100 00 Speed[mph] 25.00 25.00 Grade[%) 0.00 0.00 Curb Present No No Crosswalk Yes No Volumes Name Camino Capistrano Base Volume Input [veh/h] 64 383 399 71 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Growth Factor 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 In-Process Volume (veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Site-Oanerated Trips (veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Diverted Trips (veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips (vah/h] 0 0 0 0 Existing Sita Adjustment Volume (veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Right-Tum on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 67 402 419 75 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1:0000 1.0000 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total 15-Minute Volume [vah/h] 17 101 105 19 Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 67 402 419 75 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate (/h) 0 c 0 0 Local Bus Stopping Reta [/h] 0 0 0 0 v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossin 1 0 0 v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing ~ 0 0 v _ oo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossin ~ 0 0 v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing r~I 0 0 v_ab, Comar Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 Bicycle Volume [bicyclas/h) 0 0 1/30/2019 8 24.4 c 0.375 Verdugo Street Eastbound T Left Right 12.00 12.00 0 0 100 OD 100 00 25.00 0.00 No Yes Verdugo Street 63 44 1.0000 1.0000 2.00 2.00 1.05 1.05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 46 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 17 12 66 46 No No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 234 of 293 Generated with 1i11HJ.il4e) Version 7.00-01 Intersection Settings Located in CBD Signal Coordination Group Cycle Length [s] Coordination Type Actuation Type Offset [s] Offset Reference Permissive Mode Lost time [s) Phasing & Timing Control Type Signal group Auxiliary Signal Groups Lead /Lag Minimum Green [s] Maximum Green [s] Amber[s) Allred[s) Split[s) Vehicle Extension [s] Walk[s) Pedestrian Clearance [s] Rest In Walk 11, Start-Up Lost lime [s) 12, Clearance Lost lime [s) Minimum Recall Maximum Recall Pedestrian Recall Detector Location [ft) Detector Length [ft) I, Upstream Filtering Factor Exclusive Pedeatrlan PhaH Pedestrian Signal Group Pedestrian Walk (s) Pedestrian Clearance [s] 1130/2019 Protected Permissive 3 11 Lead 3 8 20 58 3.0 3.6 1.0 1.0 24 63 1.5 3.5 0 5 0 10 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.6 No No No No No No 00 00 00 D 0 1.00 1.00 No - 1 lime of Day Pattem Coordinated Fully actuated 0.0 Lead Green SingleBand 0.00 Permissive Permissive Permissive Permissive 12 D 9 0 Lead B 0 3 0 58 0 25 0 3.6 00 3.0 00 1.0 0 0 1.0 00 63 0 29 0 3.5 00 2.0 (1 0 5 0 5 0 10 (] 10 0 2.0 0 0 2.0 00 2.6 0 0 2.0 0 0 No No No No No No 1.0 0 0 00 00 6.0 00 00 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 7 18 9 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 235 of 293 Generated with IDij~ii;i•i Version 7 .00-01 Lane Group Calculations Lane Group C, Cycle Length (s) L, Total Lost Time per Cycle (s] 11_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 12, Clearance Lost Time (s) g_i. Effective Green Time (s) g I C, Green I Cycle (v I s)_i Volume I Saturation Flow Rate s, saturation flow rate [veh/h) c, Capacity [veh/h) d1. Uniform Delay [s) k, delay calibration I, Upstream Filtering Factor d2, Incremental Delay [s) d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] Rp, platoon ratio PF, progression factor Lane Group Results X, volume I capacity d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh) Lane Group LOS Critical Lane Group 50th-Percentile Queue Length (veh/ln) 50th-Percentile Queue Length (Mn) 95th-Percenlile Queue Length [veh/ln] 95th-Percentile Queue Length [Mn] 1130/2019 L 63 4.00 0 00 2 .00 3 0.05 0.04 1781 86 29 .69 0 .04 1.00 5.44 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.77 35 .14 D Yes 1.11 27.63 1.99 49.73 c c c 63 63 63 4.60 4.60 4.00 0 00 0 co 0 00 2.60 2.60 2.00 20 20 5 0.32 0.32 0.08 0.21 0.27 0.07 1870 1821 1697 595 579 145 18 .69 20 .14 28.29 0.13 0.13 0.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.63 4.39 3.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.68 0.85 0.77 20.32 24 .53 31 .61 c c c No Yes Yes 5.02 7.00 1.74 125.57 175.00 43.38 8.70 11.34 3.12 217.45 283.48 78.09 10 ATT AC HM ENT 2, Page 236 of 293 Generated with IB'JfJ~iiijel Versi n 7.00-01 Movement, Approach, & Intersection RHults d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh) 35.14 I 20.32 24.53 I 24.53 31 .61 I 31 .61 Movement LOS D I c c I c c I c d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh) 22.44 24.53 31 .61 Approach LOS c c c d_I, lntsrsection Delay (s/veh) 24.35 lnteruction LOS c Intersection VIC 0 .375 Other Modes g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk llme (a) 11 0 00 11 0 M_comer, Comer Circulation Area [112/ped 0 00 0 00 0 00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft'/ped 0 00 0 00 0 00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [1] 50 DO 0 00 50 OD IJ>,int, Pedesbian LOS Score for lntersectM n 2 201 0 000 1 832 Crosswalk LOS B F A s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle Ian 2000 2000 2000 c_b. capacity of the bicycle lane (bicycle&ll ~ 0 0 0 d_b, Bicycle Delay (s] 0 .50 0.50 0.50 l_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.906 4.948 4.317 Bicycle LOS E E E Sequence 1/30/2019 11 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 237 of 293 Generated with lmitJHl;J•I Version 7.00-01 Control Type: Intersection Level Of Service Report Intersection 4: Camino Capistrano and Driveway 2 Two-way stop Delay (sec I veh): Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition Level Of Service: Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v/c): Intersection Setup Name Camino Capistrano Approach Northbound Southbound Lana Configuration ,, ,.. Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Lane Widlh [ft] 11.00 12.00 12 .00 12.00 No. of Lanes In Pocket 1 0 0 0 Pocket Length [ft] 80 .00 ·oo oo 100 00 100 CD Speed[mph) 25 .00 25.00 Grade(%] 0 .00 0.00 Crosswalk No No Volumes Name Camino Capistrano Base Volume Input [veh/h] 17 426 451 4 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Growth Factor 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 In-Process Volume (veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Site-Generated Trips (veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips (veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Total Hourly Volume (veh/h] 18 447 474 4 Pea.k Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total 15-Minute Volume (veh/h) 5 112 119 1 Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 18 447 474 4 Pedestrian Volume (ped/h] 0 0 1/30/2019 12 Left 12.00 0 100 00 4 1.0000 2.00 1.05 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1.0000 1.0000 1 4 18 .3 c 0.014 Driveway Eastbound T 25.00 0.00 Yes Driveway 0 Right 12.00 0 ~, OG 00 25 1.0000 2.00 1.05 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 1.0000 1.0000 7 26 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 238 of 293 Generated with lilJijiliel Version 7 .00-01 Intersection Settings Priority Scheme Flared Lane Storage Area [veh) Two-Stage Gap Acceptance Number of Storage Spaces in Median Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results V/C, Movement VIC Ratio d_M, Delay for Movement [a/veh) Movement LOS 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 95th-Percentile Queue Length [Mn) d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh) Approach LOS d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh) Intersection LOS 1/30/2019 Free 0 0 0.02 0 00 8.38 0 00 A A 0.05 0.00 1.27 0.00 0.32 A Free Stop No 0 0 No 0 0 0 00 0 00 0.01 0.04 0 00 0 DO 18.27 11.55 A A c B 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.00 4.64 4.64 0.00 12.44 A B 0.54 c 13 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 239 of 293 Generated with lmflMIW Version 7.00-01 Verdugo Street Beautification Project Vistro File: G:\ ... \Existing.vistro Report File: G:\ .. .\Year 2020 With Project With Future Access.pdf Scenario 3 Year 2020 With Project With Access 1/30/2019 Intersection Analysis Summary ID Intersection Name Control Type Method WorstMvmt V/C Delay (s/veh) LOS 1 Camino Capistrano and Two-way stop HCM 6th WB Left 0.023 22.3 c Driveway 1 Edition 2 Camino Capistrano and Signalized HCM 6th SEB Left 0.514 28.7 c Ortega Highway Edition 3 Camino Capistrano and Signalized HCM 6th NB Left 0.369 24.4 c Verdugo Street Edition 4 Camino Capistrano and Two-way stop HCM 6th EB Left 0.014 18.3 c Driveway 2 Edition V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. 1/30/2019 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 240 of 293 Generated with liilijHig•I Version 7.00-01 Control Type: Analysis Method: Intersection Level Of Service Report Intersection 1: Camino Capistrano and Driveway 1 Two-way stop Delay (sec I veh): HCM 6th Edition Level Of Service: Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (vie): Intersection Setup Name Camino Capistrano Driveway Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Lane Configuration ., ,.. ., ,.. + Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Width [ft) 10.00 12.00 12.00 10.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100 OQ 100 00 100.00 100 DO 100 00 mo oo 100 00 ·,oo oo Speed [mph) 30.00 30.00 30.00 Grade[%) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crosswalk No No Yes Volumes Name Camino Capistrano Driveway Base Volume Input [veh/h] 35 449 16 1 370 7 11 2 34 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Growth Factor 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Site-Generated Trips [veh/h) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pess-by Trips [veh/h) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h) 37 471 17 1 389 7 12 2 36 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 9 118 4 0 97 2 3 1 9 Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 37 471 17 1 389 7 12 2 36 Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 1130/2019 2 22.3 c 0.023 Westbound + Left Thru 12.00 12.00 0 0 100 00 100 00 30.00 0.00 Yes 5 1 1.0000 1.0000 2.00 2.00 1.05 1.05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1 0 5 1 0 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 241 of 293 Right 12.00 0 100 00 7 1.0000 2.00 1.05 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1.0000 1.0000 2 7 Generated with lilifJHiij•J Ve ion 7.00-01 Intersection Settings Priority Scheme Free Free Stop Stop Flared Lane No No Storage Area (veh) 0 0 D 0 Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No No Number of Storage Spaces in Median D 0 0 0 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0 .03 0 GO D 00 0.00 0 00 0 00 0.05 0.01 0.05 0.02 0.00 0.01 d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh) 8 .20 0 00 0 00 8.35 0 CC; 0 00 21 .74 20.51 11.56 22.27 19.78 11.59 Movement LOS A A A A A A c c B c c B 95th-Percentile Queue Lenglh [veh/ln) 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0 .39 0.39 0.39 0.12 0.12 0 .12 95th-Percentile Queue Length (Mn) 2.46 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 9.68 9.68 9 .68 3 .06 3.06 3.06 d_A, Approach Delay (s/veh] 0.58 0.02 14.36 16.32 Approach LOS A A B c d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 1.26 Intersection LOS c 1/30/2019 3 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 242 of 293 Generated with IDJijfil#•j Version 7.00-01 Intersection Level Of Service Report Intersection 2: Camino Capistrano and Ortega Highway Control Type: Signalized Delay (sec I veh): Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition Level Of Service: Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v/c): lntenection Setup Name Camino Capistrano Ortega Highway Approach Northbound Westbound Lane Configuration )r .,, Turning Movement Thru Right Left Thru Lane Width (ft) 11.00 12.00 11.00 12.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 0 0 0 Pocket Length [ft] JOO 00 100 00 10G 00 100 00 Speed (mph) 25.00 25.00 Grade[%] 0.00 0 .00 Curb Present No No Crosswalk Yes Yes Volumes Name Camino Capistrano Ortega Highway Base Volume Input [veh/h) 379 118 116 133 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Growth Factor 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Diverted Trips (veh/h) 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Existing Sita Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h) 0 0 0 0 Right-Tum on Red Volume [veh/h) 0 0 0 0 Total Hourly Volume (veh/h) 398 124 122 140 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total 15-Minute Volume (veh/h] 100 31 31 35 Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 398 124 122 140 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate (/h) 0 0 0 0 Local Bus Stopping Rate (/h] 0 0 0 0 v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossin ~ 0 0 v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing r~ 0 0 v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossin I 0 0 v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing r I 0 0 v_ab, Comer Pedestrian Volume (ped/h) 0 0 Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 1/30/2019 28.7 c 0.514 Camino Capistrano Southeastbound '' Left Thru 12.00 12.00 1 0 100.00 100 00 25.00 0.00 No Yes Camino Capistrano 97 301 1.0000 1.0000 2.00 2.00 1.05 1.05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 102 316 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 26 79 102 316 No No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 243 of 293 Generated with llllfj@ltJel Versi n 7 .00-01 lnteniectlon Settings Located in CBD No Signal Coordination Group - Cycle Length [s] 1 Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Coordinated Actuation Type Fully actuated Offset [s) 0.0 Offset Reference LeadGreen Permissive Mode SingleBand Lost time [s] 0.00 Phasing & Timing Control Type Overlap Overlap Permissive Permissive Protected Permissive Signal group 11 11 7 1 7 12 Auxiliary Signal Groups 9,11 9,11 Lead/Lag Le.:~d Lead Minimum Green [s) 8 8 " 3 3 8 Maximum Green [s] 58 58 20 25 20 58 Amber[s] 3.6 3.6 3C 3.0 3.0 3.6 All red [s] 1.0 1.0 1 0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Split[s) 63 63 2.ij 29 24 63 Vehicle Extension [s) 3.5 3 .5 1 5 2.0 1.5 3.5 Walk[s) s 5 0 s 0 s Pedestrian Clearance [s) '0 10 0 iO 0 'O Rest In Walk 11, Start-Up Lost lime [s] 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 12, Clearance Lost lime [s) 2.6 2.6 ?O 2.0 2.0 2.6 Minimum Recall No No No No No Maximum Recall No No No No No Pedestrian Recall No No No No No Detector Location [ft) 1.0 1.0 100 0 100.0 1.0 175.0 Detector Length [ft) 6.0 6 .0 60 6.0 54.0 6 .0 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive Pedestrian Phase Pedestrian Signal Group 10 Pedestrian Walk [s] 7 Pedestrian Clearance [s) 18 1/30/2019 5 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 244 of 293 Generated with lil'IJiHliel Version 7 .00-01 lane Group Calculation• Lane Group C, Cycle Length [s] L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 11 _p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 12, Clearance Lost Time (s] g_i, Effective Green Time [s] g I C, Green I Cycle (v I s)_i Volume I Saturation Flow Rate s, saturation flow rate (veh/h] C, capacity (veh/h) d1, Uniform Delay [s) k, delay calibration I, Upstream F~tering Fector d2, Incremental Delay (s) d3, Initial Queue Delay (s) Rp, platoon ratio PF, progression factor Lane Group Results X, volume I capacity d, Delay for Lane Group (s/veh) Lane Group LOS Critical Lane Group 5oth-Percentile Queue Length (veMn) 50th-Percentile Queue Length {ft/In] 95th-Percentile Queue Length (veMn] 95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/In] 1/30/2019 c R 95 95 4.60 4.60 0 00 0 00 0.00 0.00 59 59 0.62 0.62 0.21 0.08 1870 1589 1164 989 8.60 7 .34 0.27 0.04 1.00 1.00 0.43 0.02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.34 0.13 9.03 7.37 A A Yes No 3.82 0 .99 95.62 24 .65 6.88 1.78 172.12 44 .38 6 L c L c 95 95 95 95 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.60 0 00 0 .00 2.00 0 00 2 .00 2 .00 2.00 2 .60 9 9 20 19 0.10 0.10 0 .21 0.20 0.07 0.07 0.10 0.17 1781 1870 986 1870 174 182 161 369 41.50 41.79 44.01 36.80 0.04 0 .04 0.04 0.13 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.94 2 .57 1.52 6 .87 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.70 0.77 0.63 0.86 43.44 44.35 45.53 43.67 D D D D No Yes Yes Yes 2.86 3 .32 2 .48 7.73 71 .44 83.09 62.04 193.31 5.14 5.98 4.47 12.29 128.60 149.56 111 .68 307 .32 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 245 of 293 Generated with liilitJHifl•i Version 7.00-01 Movement, Approach, & lnteniectlon Reaults d_M, Delay for Movement [slveh) Movement LOS d_A, Approach Delay (slveh) Approech LOS d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh) Intersection LOS Intersection V/C Other Modes g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk lime [s) M_comer, Comer Circulation Area [ft'lped M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft2/ped d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] l_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for lntersecti< n Crosswalk LOS s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle Ian c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/I I d_b. Bicycle Delay [s] l_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection Bicycle LOS Sequence 9.03 I 7.37 A I A 6.64 A 11 0 0 00 0 00 50 00 7 214 B 2000 0 0.50 4.994 E 1/30/2019 7 43.44 I 44.35 45.53 I 43.67 D I D D I D 43.93 44.13 D D 28.67 c 0.514 11 0 11 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 50 00 50 00 2 33~ 2 213 B s 2000 2000 0 0 0.50 0.50 4.565 4.822 E E ATTACHMENT 2, Page 246 of 293 Generated with IDJIWii;Jel Version 7.00-01 Intersection Level Of Service Report Intersection 3: Camino Capistrano and Verdugo Street Control Type: Signalized Delay (sec I veh): Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition Level Of Service: Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v/c): Intersection Setup Name Camino Capistrano Approach Northbound Southbound Lane Configuration ., I ,.. Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Lane Width [fl] 11.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 1 0 0 0 Pocket Length [fl] 150.00 1\}C 00 100 00 ·,o<J oo Speed [mph] 25.00 25.00 Grade[%] 0.00 0.00 Curb Present No No Crosswalk Yes No Volumes Name Camino Capistrano Base Volume Input [veh/h] 64 383 399 62 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%) 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Growth Factor 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Diverted Trips [veh/h) 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h) 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 67 402 419 65 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 17 101 105 16 Total Analysis Volume (veh/h) 67 402 419 65 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [lh] 0 0 0 D Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h) 0 0 G 0 v_do. Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossin 0 0 v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 1 n 0 0 v_oo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossin 0 0 v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing r )i 0 0 v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 1/30/2019 8 24.4 c 0.369 Verdugo Street Eastbound T Left Right 12.00 12.00 0 0 ·, 00 00 -100 00 25.00 0.00 No Yes Verdugo Street 63 44 1.0000 1.0000 2.00 2.00 1.05 1.05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 46 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 17 12 66 46 No No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 247 of 293 Generated with BfAHm•j Version 7 .00-01 Intersection Settings Located in CBD Signal Coordination Group Cycle Length (s) Coordination Type Actuation Type Offset (s] Offset Reference Permissive Mode Losttime(s] Phasing & Timing Control Type Signal group Auxiliary Signal Groups Lead/ Lag Minimum Graen [s] Maximum Green [s] Amber[s] Ali red [s] Split[s) Vehicle Extension (s) Walk[s] Pedestrian Clearance (s] Rest In Walk i1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 12, Clearance Lost Time [s) Minimum Recall Maximum Recall Pedestrian Recall Detector Location [ft) Detector Length [II] I, Upstream Filtering Factor Exclusive Pedestrian Phaae Pedestrian Signal Group Pedestrian Walk [s) Pedestrian Clearance [s] 1/30/2019 Protected Permissive 3 11 Lead 3 8 20 58 3.0 3.6 1.0 1.0 24 63 1.5 3.5 0 5 0 10 2.0 2 .0 2.0 2 .6 No No No No No No 00 00 0 0 DO 1.00 1.00 No - 1 Time of Day Pattern Coordinated Fully actuated 0.0 LeadGreen SingleBand 0.00 Permissive Permissive Permissive Permissive 12 0 9 0 Lead 8 0 3 c 58 0 25 0 3.6 00 3.0 0 0 1.0 00 1.0 00 63 0 29 u 3.5 0 0 2.0 co ~ 0 " 0 10 0 10 0 2.0 00 2 .0 00 2.6 00 2.0 ()() No No No No No No 1.0 00 0 0 00 6.0 00 0 0 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 7 18 9 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 248 of 293 Generated with lilifJHIR•i Version 7 .00-01 Lane Group Calculations Lane Group C, Cycle Length [s] L, Total Lost Time per Cycle (s] 11_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost lime (s] 12, Claarance Lost Time [s] g_i, Effective Green Time [s] g IC, Green I Cycla (v I s)_i Volume I Saturation Flow Rate s, saturation flow rate [vehlh) c, Capacity [veh/h] d1, Uniform Delay [&) k, delay calibration I, Upstream Filtering Factor d2, Incremental Delay (s] d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] Rp, platoon ratio PF, progression factor Lena Group Reaults X, volume I capacity d, Delay for Lane Group (stveh] Lene Group LOS Critical Lane Group 5oth-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 50th-Percentile Queue Length {ft/In] 951h-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/In] 1130/2019 L 62 4.00 0 00 2.00 3 0.05 0.04 1781 86 29.37 0 .04 1.00 5 .46 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.78 34.83 c Yes 1.09 27.32 1.97 49.18 c c c 62 62 62 4.60 4.60 4.00 0 00 0 00 0 00 2.60 2 .60 2 .00 19 19 5 0.31 0.31 0.08 0.21 0.26 0.07 1870 1827 1697 584 570 145 18.82 20.10 27.97 0 .13 0 .13 0.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.76 4.35 3.32 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 .69 0.85 0.77 20.58 24.45 31.30 c c c No Yes Yes 5.03 6 .78 1.71 125.64 169.62 42.86 8 .70 11.06 3 .09 217.56 276.41 77 .14 10 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 249 of 293 Generated ~th Pfj~iifM Ver · n 7.00-01 Movement, Approach, & lnter11ectlon Results d_M, Delay for Movement [s/Yeh] Movement LOS d_A, Approach Delay [s/Yeh] Approach LOS d_I, lntarseclion Delay [s/veh] Intersection LOS Intersection VIC Other Modes g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] M_comer, Comer Circulation Area [ft'/ped M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft'/ped d_p, Pedestrian Delay (s] l_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for lntersecti• n Crosswalk LOS s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle Ian 1 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/t~ d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] l_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection Bicycle LOS Sequence 34.83 I c I 22.61 c 11 0 0 00 0 00 50 00 2 207 8 2000 0 0.50 4.906 E 20.58 24.45 I 24.45 31.30 I 31.30 c c I c c I c 24.45 31.30 c c 24.36 c 0.369 0 0 11 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 D 00 50 00 0 000 1 828 f A 2000 2000 0 0 0.50 0.50 4.931 4.317 E E ~!~~I 1° 11 I ; I : I ~~ 1-1-1-1-1-1-1-I -1-1-I -I 1/30/2019 11 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 250 of 293 Generated with lilJii~ilRel Version 7.00-01 Intersection Level Of Service Report Intersection 4: Camino Capistrano and Driveway 2 Control Type: Two-way stop Delay (sec I veh): Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition Level Of Service: Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v/c): Intersection Setup Name Camino Capistrano Approach Northbound Southbound Lane Configuration ,, I- Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Lane Width [ft) 11.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 1 0 0 0 Pocket Length [ft) 80.00 120 co 100 00 iOO 00 Spead [mph) 25.00 25.00 Grade[%) 0.00 0.00 Crosswalk No No Volumes Name Camino Capistrano Base Volume Input [veh/h) 17 426 451 4 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%) 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Growth Factor 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 In-Process Volume [veh/h) 0 0 0 0 Sita-Generated Trips [veh/h) 0 0 0 0 Diverted Trips [veh/h) 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [vah/h) 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h) 18 447 474 4 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h) 5 112 119 1 Total Analysis Volume [veh/h) 18 447 474 4 Pedestrian Volume (ped/h] 0 0 1/30/2019 12 Left 12.00 0 1CJG 00 4 1.0000 2.00 1.05 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1.0000 1.0000 1 4 18.3 c 0.014 Driveway Eastbound T 25.00 0.00 Yes Driveway 0 Right 12.00 0 100 00 25 1.0000 2 .00 1.05 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 1.0000 1.0000 7 26 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 251 of 293 Generated with gtj@I;@ Version 7.00-01 Intersection Settings Priority Scheme Flared Lane Storage Area [veh) Two-SmgeGapAccepmnce Number of Storage Spaces in Median Movement, Approach, & lnte111ectlon Results VIC, Movement VIC Ratio d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh) Movement LOS 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln) 95th-Percentile Queue Length [Mn] d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] Approach LOS d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] Intersection LOS 1/30/2019 Free 0 0 0.02 0 00 8.38 0 00 A A 0.05 0.00 1.27 0.00 0.32 A Free Stop No 0 0 No 0 0 0 00 0 DO 0,01 0.04 0 00 0 00 18.27 11.55 A A c B 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.00 4.64 4.64 0.00 12.44 A B 0.54 c 13 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 252 of 293 APPENDIX F: AIR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ATTACHMENT 2, Page 253 of 293 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016 .3.2 Page 1of18 Date: 3/15/2019 3:46 PM Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Summer 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Lard Uses Olliat Non-Asphalt Su1faces 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urban lzallon Climoto Zana Utility Company C02 Intensity (lb/MWhr) Urban 13 Soulhern California Edison 702.44 Sl~a 3.15 Wind Speed (m/s) CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use - Verdugo Street Beautification Orange County, Summer 2.2 0.029 Metric 100Clsqfl Precipitation Freq (Days) Operational Year N20 Intensity (lb/MWhr) Lot Acreage 0.07 30 2019 0.006 Flo0< Surf aw Area 3,150.00 Construction Phase -Demolition of existing hardscape, site preparation and project implementation assumed to occur simultaneously Grading - Demolition- Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -SCAQMD Rule 403 PopulatiOfl 0 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 254 of 293 CalEEMod Version : CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2of18 Date: 3/15/2019 3:46 PM Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Summer Table Name I Column Name I Default Value I New Va lue tblConstDu stMitigation CleanPavedRoadPercentReduction 0 I 40 : : : : : : :t~l~~~~t:~u~'.~i~i~~t'.~n::::::: ! : : ~~t~'.~~~a:v~~~~~~~~~i~I~~~~~~:: t=====---===~====1:::::::::::: ~~:::::::::::: tblConstructionPhase : NumDays : 10.00 I 75 .00 -..... -. ------.. -. -------. ---.; --. ------.. -------------------1--------------------t -... --. --. -----. ---------- • ___ • _ -t~'.~~n_s'.r~~~~~~~a-s~-_. ___ .l .. _________ ~~~-~·:~ .. _ .. _____ -L----------~~--------i-_ ·-... ___ . ~~·~~ ___ --_____ . tblConstructionPhase ; NumDays ; 1.00 1 75 00 ----.. -----------------. -... -.; -----------------------------.;.----------------------.f --.. ---------------------- : : : : : : : :~~~~~:;:~~~~~~:~~::::::: i::::::::: ~~~~~;~~~~:~::::::::: r---======-~~;~~~i====j::::::::: ;i~:~~~~~::::::::: tblConstructionPhase • PhaseEndDate • 3/29/2019 1 9/27/2019 . -... -------------. ---.. -----~ -----------------------. -----.;_ ________________ ------t . ------------------------- tblConstructionPhase ; PhaseStar\Date ; 3/15/2019 I 6/15 /201 9 . ---.. --------. -------------• 4 • ---.. -------------. ---. ---.. -1-------------------t. -.... -------------. ---... tblConstructionPhase ; PhaseStartDate ; 8/2112019 I 6/15/2019 . ----.. -..... --------.. --. -. -4 ----.. -----.... --------------4---------------4 . --. --.. -------.... ------- tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 3/29/2019 6/15/2019 2.0 Emissions Summary ATTACHMENT 2, Page 255 of 293 CalEEMod Version : CalEEMod .2016 .3.2 Page 3of18 Date : 3/15/2019 3:46 PM Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Summer 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Con st ru ction RO G NOx co S02 Fugilive Exhaust PM10 PM10 Year lb/day 2019 2 6393 25 4823 20 1641 0 .0368 0 9224 1 3494 Maximum 2,6393 25AB23 20, 1641 0.0368 0 .9224 1.3494 Mitiga ted Const ructi on ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 PM10 Year lb/day 2019 .. 2 .6393 25.4823 20 1641 0 0368 0.4570 1 3494 Maximum 2.6393 25.4823 20.1641 0.0368 0.4 570 1.3494 ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive Exhausl PM10 PM10 Percent 0,00 0 .00 o.oo 0 .00 50.46 0 .00 Reduction PM10 Total 2 2718 2.2718 PM10 Total 1,8064 1.8064 PM10 Total 20.49 Fugitive Exhaust PM2 5 PM2 5 0 ,1588 1.2633 0.1588 1.2633 Fugitive Exhaust PM25 PM2.5 0 .0903 1-2633 0 ,0903 1 .2633 Fuglllve Exhaust PM2 .5 PM2.5 43.15 0 .00 PM25 Total 1.4221 1.4221 PM2,5 Total 1,3535 1.3535 PM2.5 Total 4 ,82 Bio-C02 NBio-C02 Tolal C02 CH4 N20 C02e lb/day Q QQ{)() I J .559 685 I 3.559 685 I Q 8381 : 3 : 3 : Q QQ()(} I J,580 637 : 4 0.0000 3,559,685 3,559.685 0.8381 0.0000 3,580.637 3 3 4 Bi<>-C02 NBio-C02 Tota\C02 CH4 N20 C02o lb/day 0 .0000 t J,559 685 I 3,559 685 I : 3 I 3 : 0 8381 0 0000 I J,580,637 ' 4 . ' 0 .0000 3,559,685 3,559.685 0.8 381 0.0000 3,580.637 3 3 • Bio· C02 NBio·C02 Tolal C02 CH4 N20 C02e 0 .00 0 ,00 0 .00 0 .00 0.00 0 .00 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 256 of 293 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4of18 Date: 3/15/2019 3:46 PM Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Summer 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx Calegory co 502 Fugmve Exhaust PM10 PM10 lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive Exhaust PM2 5 PM2 5 PM2.5 Total Bio-C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e lb/day Area :: 1 .3gg~e-: 0,0000 : 3 2gg~e-: O 0000 : : O 0000 : O 0000 O 0000 : O 0000 : 6 9g~e-: 6 9g~e-: 0,0000 : : 7 4gg2e- •·1 t I I I I I • I • I I I ................. -----·-·-·---------------...,---------------............. •.--,---------.... --.. -.. Energy ~~ 0 0000 ~ 0.0000 i 0 0000 ~ 0 0000 ; i 0 0000 ~ 0 0000 • I a 0000 ~ 0 0000 l : 0~0000 ; 0.0000 ~ 0.0000 1 0.0000 : 0 .0000 • • .. M~biie .. -• • :.--o-OoOO~D."OaOO~--a:oooo--:-00ooo-~000o--:-ooaOo-~OoOOO-~oOoOO-:---ooaOO":"-O-oOOO_] _ -· · · · ·:-OciOoO~o-OoOo-~-0.0000 -I : o.aaao •1 I t I I I I I I I t I I I I Total 1.3900e-0.0000 3.2000e-0 ,0000 003 004 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx co 502 Category 0.0000 0.0000 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 PM10 lb/day 0.0000 PM10 Total 0.0000 0.0000 Fugitive Exhaust PM2 5 PM2 5 0.0000 PM2.5 Toi.al 6.9000e-6.9000e-0.0000 0.0000 7.4000e- 004 004 004 Bio-C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e lb/day Area :: 1 3~g~e-: o 0000 : 3 2gg 4 oe-: o 0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 : o 0000 : o 0000 : 6 9000e-: 6 9000e-: o 0000 : 7 4gg~e- . · -E~;,~;-· · raoooo : o 0000 to 0000 t"ooooo-: . o 0000 • 0.0000 f--fociOOoT-'Oiioooi" · · · · .. ~ o ::o >~~:o ~ 0 .0000 1 o 0000 ; • o iiocio' · -----. -----=-------..:--.-.:----~----·-~---.;-----~--~·--~--·--~-------! ---... ---:----.~----.--.:-.---.:--.---.--:. ---... --- Mobile :: 0.0000 : 0.0000 • 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0 .0000 • 0.0000 • 0 ,0000 • 0.0000 : 0.0000 1 0.0000 I : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0 .0000 • : 0.0000 ' ' I Total 1.3900•· 0.0000 3.2000•· 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.9000e-6.9000e-0.0000 0.0000 7.4000•· 003 004 004 004 004 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 257 of 293 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5of18 Date: 3/15/2019 3:46 PM ROG Percent 0.00 Reduclion 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Pll~~.e Number Phase Name NOx co 0,00 0 .00 Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Summer 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 PM10 PM10 Tola! 0.00 0,00 0.00 0 .00 Phase Type S(art C'Jate Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Blo-C02 PM2.5 0 .00 End D~to PM2.5 Total 0 .00 0.00 0.00 Num ·Da )'~. Num Days Wee ~ NBlo·C02 Total C02 CH4 0.00 0,00 0,00 Phase Description ,_ ••• _. -~~~~~t'.ti.o~ ••• _ •• _ ••• _ •• ____ ;~~~-o~i~~~---------------i ~,:~~0_1: _____ J:~~~o_1: ____ J__ ____ :j__ __ _5 ... _ ... __ . _ .. _. ______ .. __ 2 ;Site Preparation ;site Preparation :6/15/2019 :912 712019 : 5: 75: . --. ---:. --.. --------------------~-'-------------.f--·---·---f...-·------' -1------~ -------.... ---. -----...... -·-.. 3 ;Pavng ;Paving :6/15/2019 :9127/2019 5; 75; Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 37.5 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0.07 N20 0.00 Residential Indoor: O; Residential Outdoor: O; Non-Residential Indoor: O; Non-Residential Outdoor: O; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating -sqft) OffRoad Equjpment C02e 0.00 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 258 of 293 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6of18 Date: 3/15/2019 3:46 PM Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Summer Phase Name I Off road r:·qu1 pm en\ Typ e I Amount Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor Paving :Cement and Mortar Mixers : 41 6.00: 9: 0.56 ----··-··-·-----------·-···-~--------------------------~-----------------------------~ ~·-····-·--·-·· Demolition •Concrele/lnduslrial Saws • 1 8 00 • 81 • 0.7 3 . -.......... -.. -. --. --...... i---------------------------~-----------------------------~---·-----~ .... -. -. --... . Sile Preparation ;Graders : 1 8,00: 187 ! 0-41 . -.... -... ·-.. -.. --. -..... -· 1--------------------------+-----------------------------~---.. --... ---. Paving : Pavers : 1 7 ,00 : 130: OA 2 .. --.. ----------------------1---------------------------.... ----------------------------1--------------~ -------------. Paving •Rollers • 1 7.00• BO• 0.38 ____________________________ ; ___________________________ ~-----------------------------~ ~---··········· Demolition :Rubber Tired Dozers : 1 1.00: 247: 0-40 --.. -. -.... --... ---. --. --. --·--------------------------+-----------------------------~ --------------Demolilion :Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes : 2 6.00: 97 : 0.37 .••• • • • •. ,. --•...•••. -. --.. ·I· ------------· ------------+--------------------------+---·----------~ ---. -. --. -. --. Paving :Tractorsllotide rs/B.e c.kho es : 1 7.oo: 97! 0.37 . -. ----..... -. --. ----. --.. -. ~------------------~----_, _________ , _____ ~ ~. ---... -.... -. Site Preparation ;Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1: 8.00; 97 ; 0._37 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Number Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length WO<IC er VehJCl e Class Vendor Ha uling Vehi cl e Clas• Vehicle Class Demolition : 4: 10.00: O.OO I 7.oo: 14.70: 6.9o: 20oo:LD_Mix :HDT_MI• IHHDT ·-· ... -. --.. -. ·--1-----------1----------1--·--· -.. -'·---------1-----1------~----------·-------------+----. ---. .!. • --••••••• Sit e Preparation : 2 : 5.oo: 0.001 o.oo: 14 .70: 6.9o : 20 .00 ;LD_Mix :HDT _Ml>< IHHDT . -............. -i------------1---------1-----4-------1--------~--------+--------.i------------.i---------.!. ---. ----. - Paving 7 ; 18 .oo: o.oo: o.oo: 14 .?0: 6.90: 20 .00;LD_Mix ;HDT_Mix ;HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads Clean Paved Roads ATTACHMENT 2, Page 259 of 293 CalEEMod Version : CalEEMod .2016 .3.2 Page 7of18 Date : 3/15/2019 3:46 PM 3.2 Demolition -2019 Un mitigate d Construction On -Site ROG NOx co Category S02 Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Summer Fugitive Exhaust PM10 PM10 lb/day PM10 Tola I Fugllive Exhausl PM2.5 PM2.5 PM25 Totat Bio-C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 lb/day CH4 N20 C02e Fugitive Dust : ' ' 1 : 0 ,0216 : O 0000 : O 0216 : 3 2;0~e-: O 0000 : 3 2ci:e-j • : 0~0000 : 1 : O 0000 --.. -.. -. --=-------.:-.--..:----.:-------..:...-.-.---..:---.-~---·----:--------0:..---~------J. ----. -:-.-------~----~-----.:-----~ ...... . Off-Road •• 09530 • 86039 1 76Q17 • 00120 • • 05371 1 0,5371 • ' 0.5125 • 05125 I • 1,159657•1,159.657 • 02211 • 1,165.184 : I I I • I j I Q I Q ! I 7 Total 0.9 530 8.6039 7.6917 0 .0120 0.0216 0,5371 0.5587 3 .2700e-0.5125 0.5157 003 1,159.657 1 ,159.657 0.2211 0 0 1 ,1 65.184 7 Unmitigated Con st ruction Off-Site ROG NOx co S02 Category Fugitive Exhaust PM10 PM10 lb/day PM10 Total Fugilive Exhaust PM2 .5 PM2.5 PM25 Tolar Bio-C02 NBlo-C02 Total C02 lb/day CH4 N20 C02e Hauling •• 7,8000e-I 0.0277 I 66300e-I 7 ,0000e-I 163009-I 1 ,1000e-I 17300e-. 440009-I 1.0000e-. 5.5000e-I 8,0507 I 80507 I 84000e-' ' 8_0717 ••004 1 :003 :oos :oo3 :004 !003 !004 !004;004 i' i : :004 ! ; ... v;~~; .. -:0ooo-o~;-o-o-oo-o-:()Qooo-;ooooo-;o.00o0f00000:o0o00:00000-:00000;-0oooo-....... :--0-0000-;ooooo;-oOoOO-:---~: . 0 0000- •• I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -. -. ---.. -. ~----_...;,...._ . . -~-·-.:--.-~--·---.:----·~·---4--------J ----. -.. :--.-.--.;..--.----..:.-------~·----~. -. --- Worker .. 00412 : 00270 03567 1.1g:e-: 0 .1118 : 75g0~e-: 01125 : 00296 : 69g~oe-: 00303 f : 1126140: 112.6140: 2 .7~0~e-: : 112.6633 Total 0.0420 0.0547 I I • I I I 0 .3634 1.2000e-0 ,1134 8.6000e-0.1143 0,0301 7.9000e· 003 004 004 0,0309 120.6647 120 .6647 3.6100•· 003 120.7549 ATTACHMENT 2 , Page 260 of 293 CalEEMod Version : CalEEMod.2016 .3.2 Page8of18 Date : 3/15/2019 3:46 PM 3.2 Demolition· 2019 Mitigated Con struction On-Si te ROG NOx Category co S02 Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Summer Fuglllve Exha ust PM10 PM10 lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive Exhaust PM25 PM 25 PM2 5 Total Bio· C02 N81o· C02 Total C02 lb/day Fugiti ve Dust :: 1 • • : 8 .~30~-: 0 .0000 : 6 4;~~&-: 1 2~g~e-: 0 ,0000 : 1 .2~:&-t : : 0.0000 : .... -.... -----.. ::-.------:.------.:----.:--.---·.;..._-----.:--.------. ..:-.---.:-----~·-·--.;.,------J .. -....... ·~----... .:-- CH4 Off-Road 0,9530 • B.6039 • 76917 • 00120 • • 0 .5371 • 0 .5371 • 0.5125 05125 ! 0 .0000 • 1,159657 • 1,159657 • 0 2211 .. : I f I • o Q I Q I Total 0 .9530 8.6039 7.6~17 0.0120 8.43000-0.5371 003 Mitigated Co nst ruction Off-Site ROG NOx co S02 Fuglllve Exhaust PM10 PM10 Category lb/day Hauling 0.5455 1 .28000-0.5125 PM10 Total 003 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 PM25 0 .5136 PM25 Total ' 0.0000 1 ,159.657 1,159.657 0.2211 0 0 Bio· C02 NBio-C0 2 Total C02 CH4 lb/day Total 0.0420 0.0547 0.3634 1.2000e-0.0740 8.6000e-0 ,0749 0.0204 7 .. 9000e-0 ,0212 120.6647 120.6647 J .6100e- 003 004 004 003 N20 N20 C02e : 00000 1,165.184 7 C02e : e .0111 120.7549 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 261of293 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod .2016 .3.2 Page 9of18 Date: 3/15/2019 3:46 PM 3.3 Site Preparation -2019 Unm itigate d Construct.Ion On-Site ROG NOx co Calegory 502 Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Summer Fugitive Exhaust PM10 PM10 lb/day PM10 Tolel Fugll/ve Exhausl PM25 PM25 PM25 Total Bio-C02 NSio-C02 Total C02 lb /day CH4 N20 C02e Fugitive Oust :; : 0,5303 : o 0000 : o 5303 : 0,0573 : o 0000 : 0 ,0573 f , : O 0000 : , : 0.0000 ... I l I I I I I I I ii • I I t I ~ ' • ' • • • • ' • j • ' • • • . . ·on.R;a·d--•• ::-oJ195~i-4;4~-;;:--:----~-o3e72":CJ.3B72-~----:c,33787""Q3378-l1 · ..... -~0~9s5.1600:-03o54--:----:' 9ii 80.32 : : : : 003 : : : : : : : : : : : •l I I I I I , I 1 • l I '-o O Total 0.7195 8.9170 4.1407 9.7500•-0.5303 0,3672 003 Unmltigated Constructi on Off-Site ROG NOx co 502 Fugillve f:xheust PM10 PM10 Calegory lb/day 0.8975 PM10 Total 0 .0573 0.3378 Fugitive Exhauel PM2 .5 PM2 5 0,3951 PM2 .5 Total 965.1690 965.1690 0.3054 972.8032 Bio-C02 NBlo-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e lb/day Hauling :: 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : O,oooo : O 0000 O 0000 : O 0000 : O 0000 : O 0000 ' : O 0000 : O 0000 : O 0000 : : O 0000 -- 0 V~~~;---r-0-0000-roooootooboo ~ 0 0000-~ 0,0000 r 0 0000 . 0 0000 -ro.ciooo1000o°io"oooo-1 · -----"(oocioorooooor-o-00001---r. 0 0000° . -. W~~k~~ ..... :-o02o6~0135:-01184:5'.60007t---:-o:Os5Q--:-370oo;-:-o-Os6J---o.o146~ 4oooe-o 0152-·1 · ....... ·:-s530-;o--:-5e307o-~138oO-;.-~·-----: ·s6 .3416 . I 1 004 1 :004 : :0()4 t : : :003: : Total 0.0206 0 .01 35 0.1784 5.6000&-0.0559 3.7000•-0.0563 0.0148 3.40008· 0 .0152 56.3070 56.3070 1.3800•· 56.3416 004 004 004 003 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 262 of 293 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3 ,2 Page 10of18 Date: 3/15/2019 3:46 PM 3.3 Site Preparation -2019 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx Category co S02 Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Summer Fugilive Exhausl PM10 PM10 lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive Exhausl PM25 PM25 PM2.5 Total Bio-C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 lb/day CH4 N20 C02e Fugitive Dust :: : 0,2088 : O 0000 : O 2068 : O 0223 : O 0000 : O 0223 : 0 0000 : • : O 0000 •• I I t t I I I I I " 1 I I t 1 ........ -.......... =---._...:-·-·---.:------:.----·--=--·-.:--.---~--·--~--·--..:---·--.:-------·J . ----... :------:------..:.-------.:.---.--:. ...... . Off-Road .. 0.7195 B.9170 4.1407 • 9.7500e-• 0.3672 0 ,3672 0.3378 0.3378 1 , 0 .0000 • 965,1690 • 965 .1690 1 O 3054 • 972 ,8032 : 003 I I : t I . ' Total 0,7195 8.9170 4 ~1407 9.7500e-0 ,2068 0.3672 0 ,5740 0 ,0223 0,3378 0.3602 0.0000 965.1690 965.1690 0.3054 972.8032 003 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx co Category Hauling S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 PM10 lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive Exhaust PM2 5 PM2 ,5 PM2 5 Total Bio-C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 lb/day CH4 N20 C02e : 0 0000 :: o 0000 : 0,0000 : o 0000 : o 0000 : o 0000 : o 0000 : o 0000 : 0 .0000 : 0 .0000 : 0.0000 i : o 0000 : 0 .0000 : o 0000 : ---... ---. -:.:---~---.:----.:.--------.:.-.-----~---~----.;...--.:-----+------· ........... :.--.---~---·--..:-·-----~--.:. ---.. -- Vendor :: 0.0000 0.0000 : 0 0000 : O 0000 : O 0000 : 0 .0000 ! O 0000 : 0.0000 ! 0 .0000 : 0 0000 t : 0 0000 : 0,0000 : 0.0000 : : 0 ,0000 ••••o.••••• .. ,..-----i----1 I I f t I I I 1 t I I I I I worker .. o 0206 0.0135 ~01784~6000';_~--:-37~o-0368~M101~3.40o0~-0~o104-------·:--56307o-~563010i13BOo-;:-i-------~ ·5·6 ~3416 : :004: !004! : :004: : : :003: : I I I I I f I I ! • o I l Total 0.0206 0.0135 0 ,1784 5,6000e-0.0365 3.7000e-0,0368 0.0101 3.4000e-0.0104 56.3070 56.3070 1.3800e-56.3416 004 004 004 003 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 263 of 293 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod .2016.3.2 Page 11 of 18 Date : 3/15/2019 3:46 PM Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Summer 3.4 Paving -2019 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive Exhausl PM10 PM10 Category lb/day OH·Roo.d : o 8300 : 7.8446 : 7 1476 ; o 0113 0-4425 H I f I PM10 Tolal Fugilive Exhaust PM25 PM25 PM25 Total Bio-C02 NBio· C02 T olal C02 lb/day CH4 N20 C02e : : : : 3 : 3 : : : ' .. o • I .......... -..... -----~----... ---.._...---~-· Paving O 0000 0.4425 . • 0 .4106 . 04106 l •1.055182.'1.055 .182 • 03010 . •1,062723 ~-o.-oo_o_o ~-0-0000 ; -----; o.aooa-t-00ooo-. -. --. ·t-------r-o.oaOO--~--------~----t .. 0 OOOa· ~ Total 0.8300 7.8446 7.1478 0.0113 0.4425 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx co 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 PM10 Category lb/day 0.4425 PM10 Total I I I I I I I I o t ! I ! I I 0.4106 Fugitive Exhaust PM2 5 PM2 5 0.4108 PM25 Total 1,055.182 1,055.182 0.3016 3 3 Bio-C02 NBlo· C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 lb/day 1,062.723 1 C02e Hauling :: 0 0000 : 0 0000 : O 0000 : 0 0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : O 0000 : 0 0000 : 0 0000 ; O 0000 : 0 0000 : 0 0000 : ; 0 0000 •• I f I t I I I I t I I ' ............... =------~---~·---.-~-·----·.:-----~--._..:,._--.~----.:----~---·----· .. --.. -~----~----..:----.-....:-----.:. -.... -- Vendor ~ 0.0000 ~ OrOOOO ~ 0,0000 l 0 0000 i 0.0000 l 0,0000 ~ 0.0000 ~ 0.0000 ~ 0 0000 ~ 0 0000 1 ~ 0 0000 ~ 0 0000 j 0.0000 ~ ~ 0.0000 .. -.. w~;k~; -... ::--o0742~6'i06421i20300;-iQ2o12-~-:;3400-;_--:--o-2025 -:-o-os34 -~1 240~-~-o-o546-i ........ "':2'02.1053 I 202.7053 I 4.9BoOe--:---: 20i 62.96 Total 0.0742 : : 1 003: 1 003 1 I :om: t 1 ! :OQ3 1 : 0.0486 0 ,6421 2,0300e-0.2012 1.3400a· 0.2025 0.0534 1.2400•· 003 003 003 0 .0546 202.7053 202.7053 4.9800•· 003 202 .8298 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 264 of 293 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12of18 Date: 3/15/2019 3:46 PM Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Summer 3.4 Paving -2019 Mitigated Constructio n On-S ile ROG NOx co 502 Fugilive Exhaust PM10 PM10 Category lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive Exhaust PM2 5 PM2 5 PM2 5 Tolal Bio-C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e lb/day Off-Road !: 00300: 7 .6446: 7.1478: 00113: : 04425: 04425: : 0.4106: 04106 00000 :1,os;1e2:1,os;1s2: 03016: :1,06~723 . -........... :--.--.:-------:---~-----~-----_.;...---~--·~-----.:--·--~--·---J -. --. --~-----.;....-----.:.-----...:.-----~ -. --.. Paving : O 0000 : ! 0 ,0000 : 0 0000 : : 0 .0000 : O 0000 i • : 0.0000 : ! : 0 .0000 Total 0.8300 7.8446 7.1478 0.0113 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx co 502 Category 0.4425 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 PM10 lb/day 0.4425 PM10 Total 0.4106 Fugitive Exhaust PM2 5 PM2 5 0.4106 PM2 .5 Total Hauling :: 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0 .0000 : 0 _0000 : 0,0000 : 0.0000 : 0 ,0000 : 0.0000 : 0,0000 : 0,0000 I I I I I I I I I .... I I I I I I I I I . . . . . . . . . . . -----------.-..,---.-.,.-----------·--·----..-----·--------.,.-----...,..------- Vendor :: 0 0000 : 0 0000 : 0 0000 : 0 0000 : 0 0000 : 0 0000 : 0 ,0000 : 0 0000 : 0,0000 : 0 ,0000 I I I I 1 I I I I .. I I I I I I I I I • -• w~;k~; ••• :--o-0142-:--o-04efi-~-0642'1-·-:-2rooo-;:---:--o-1312-~1340c;;:---:--o-1326-o.0362-~_2400;:-~-o~374- I • 1 003 1 1 003 1 1 003• Total 0.0742 0.0486 0.6421 2.0300•· 0.1312 1.3400•· 0.1326 0.0362 1.2400•· 0.0374 OOJ 003 003 4.0 Operational Detail -Mobile 0.0000 1,055.182 1,055,182 0.3016 3 3 Bio-C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 lb/day N20 1,062.723 1 C02e : 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 : : 0 _0000 ' ' ' • I I I I . ---. --,---·---,------...._-------....--.---... ---... : 0.0000 : 0,0000 : 0 0000 : : 0 0000 I I I I I I I I I . -. -. -. .--·--------------------..--·-·--.... -.. -. I 202 7053 I 202 7053 I 4 98000-I I 202,8298 I I I 003 I I 202.7053 202.7053 4.9800•· 003 202 .8298 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 265 of 293 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13of18 Date: 3/15/2019 3:46 PM Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Summer 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG I Nox I co I S02 I FugiUve I Exhausl I PM10 PM10 PM10 I Fugilive I Exhaust I Tolel PM2,5 PM2 5 PM25 Total Bio-C02 I NBIO · C02 I Total C02 I CH4 I N20 I C02e Category lb/day lb/day Miligated ~ O 0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0 0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0 0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 ; 0 0000 f ., I I I I I I 4 • 0 .0000 : ' 0 0000 : 0 0000 : 0 0000 ........... --:;. .. _____ ..;. ............ ..;. .... ---.. ..:.------...:.-----.. ..;. ............ ..;. ............ ..;. ............ ..:. ............ ..;. .. ------£ -. ----- Unmitigated •• 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0000 0 0000 0.0000 0 0000 O 0000 • I I I I -o OOa_o_.,._OOOaO"".,. .. OOOoO--:---------:--0 OOOa· ... 4.2 Trip Summary Information I Average Daily Trip Rate I Unmitigated I Mitigated Land Use I Weekday I Saturday 1sunday I Annual VMT I Annual VMT Other Noo·Asph•ll Surf31;w; . 0.00 . 0.00 I 0.00 : Total I 0.00 I 0.00 I 0.00 I I 4.3 Trip Type Information I Miles I Trip 0/o I Trip Purpose % Land Use I H-W or C-W I H-S or C-C I H-0 or C-NW I H-W or C-WI H-S or C-C I H-0 or C-NW I Primary I Diverted I Pass-by Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces : 16 .60 8.40 6.90 . 0.00 0.00 0.00 : 0 0 : 0 . 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LOA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.552373; 0,044229; 0.211123; 0.119112; 0.017503; 0,005797; 0.024455; 0.015685; 0001637; 0.001633; 0.004830; 0.000583; 0 .001041 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 266 of 293 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14of18 Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Summer 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG I Nox I ·co I .so2 I PIJulUva I El<houot I PM lo I FutJl~;o I ~Oot I PM 2,tl" p ~ 10 PM 10 Tclo l Pj.12 .G PM~G TclS\ N.alurnlGns._ Mlllgotod :: Q.0000 : tl .0000 : C.0000 : 0.0000 : f I ~ I : 0 .0000 : 6.0000 : : o 0000 : o.oOoo ' . .. I I I I I I I I I -·,.;ni.;,~e;~; -----0 000o-.... ·-ooooo-...... -o.ooo-o-...... -o_oooo--------.... -0.0000-...... -0.0000-...--------.--ti~-.... -o~oooo- u.'1'"Rtoo1od ... Date : 3/15/2019 3:46 PM 0 ,0000 : 0.0000 : o.aooo : 0.0000 o.cooo . ' ' -o 0000-~ -o 0000-~ -o.oooe.-~ -o 0000-0.0000 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 267 of 293 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod .2016 .3.2 5.2 Energy by Land Use -NaturalGas Unmitigated NaluralGa ROG NOx co s Use Land Use kBTU/yr Other Non-0 ,0000 0 0000 0 0000 Asphalt Surfaces : Total 0 ,0000 0 ,0000 0.0000 Mi t igated NO\•tal Go l\C/_G tlO)I' co .u .. liw)dllbo kEl°TUlyi- Olher Non-o_oooo 0 .0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces : Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area Page 15of18 Date: 3/15/2019 3:46 PM Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Summer S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2 ,5 Bio-C02 NBlo-C02 Tolal C02 CH4 N20 C02e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM25 Total lb/day lb/day 0 0000 0 0000 0 0000 0 0000 0 ,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0000 00000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0&0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 soi fug~ive E•llnusl PM10 FugJijyo E<hnoaj PM2.6 lllo-CQ2· NBJO· eo1 Totn J co2 · CtiA N20 C02e Pr.10 PM10 Total PM25 PM2 5 Tolal lb/day lb/day 0 .0000 0.0000 0 .0000 0.0000 0 .0000 0 .0000 0 0000 0.0000 0 0000 0 0000 0,0000 0,0000 0.0000 0,0000 0,0000 0.0000 o.aooo o.oaoo 0.0000 0,0000 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 268 of 293 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod .2016.3.2 ROG I NOx I co I S02 Category Page 16of18 Date: 3/15/2019 3:46 PM Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Summer I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 PM10 lb/day I PM10 I Fugitive I Exhaust I PM2 5 Total PM2 .5 PM2 5 Total Bio-C02 r Bio· C02 r olal C02 I CH4 I N20 I C02e lb/day Miligalod •• 1 3900e-I 0.0000 I 3 200De-I 0.0000 I I o_oooo I o _oooo I I Q_QQOO I 0 0000 • • 6 9000e-I 6 9000e-• 0 0000 I I 7 40000- :: 003: :004: : : : : : : ! :004:004: : :004 -----------:.------..:.------..:..------..:.------..:..------..:..------..:..------..:.------..:..------..:.-------. ------:-------...:-------..:.------..:.-------:. ------. unmitigated •• 1 3900e-• o~oooo • 3 20000-• 0.0000 a 0000 o 0000 a 0000 o 0000 • 6 soooe-• e 9000e-• o 0000 • 7 40000- 003 ' • 004 • • 004 • 004 • • 004 6.2 Area by Subcategory Unmitigated ROG NOx SubCategoiy Architectural •• 2.4000e-• Coating •• 004 : co S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 PM10 lb/day PM10 Tolal Fugitive Exhaust PM2 5 PM2 5 PM2 5 Total Bio-C02 NBk>-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e lb/day 0 0000 : 0 0000 : : 0 0000 : 0,0000 i : 0.0000 : : 0 0000 ... C~n·s~,;,;r· ... :-1 .12ooe-I --:----~----~---~-0-0000 ; -90000-t----r-o-:-00o0t-o:-00oo-1 • ...... --·;----raoooot----~--·--·t. 0 0000· • • • . P:~d.u~~ ••• ~~~--.:-----:-----...;..--.---;...---;-..-·---.i--·---l-------4.---1 ...... ·~-----.i------~------..L-·-----l-......... . Landscaping •• 3,0~~e-• 0.0000 : 3 2~e-• o 0000 o 0000 o 0000 o 0000 o 0000 i : 6 9g~e-: 6 9g~oe-: o 0000 : 7 ~e- Total 1 .3900&-0.0000 3.2000e-0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 004 0.0000 1 • I I 6 .9000e-6 .9000e-0.0000 004 004 7.40008· 004 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 269 of 293 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated ROG NOx Subcategory co 502 Page 17of18 Date: 3/15/2019 3:46 PM Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Summer Fugitive E"xhaust PM10 PM10 lb/day PM10 Total Fugillve Exhaust PM25 PM25 PM2 5 Total Bio-C02 NBlo-C02 Total C02 lb/day CH4 N20 C02e Ar~~t=~~al :: 2 4g0~e-: , : o 0000 : a 0000 : : o 0000 : O 0000 : o 0000 : o 0000 ............. ::-----.:--~ ----~-.:__ ___ l-. _____ .:_ __ J_ ____ ~ _______ j . -...... -~---c~r~~uu~~r :: 1 1;g~e-: : f : : Q QQQQ : Q QQQQ : : Q QQQQ : Q QQQQ ! : I Q_QQQQ I ----~----1·0 OOOo'" • .. --...... -.. =:-,------.:.------..:-------~-------.:.-----~----.;......-----.:--------.:----~----.J ...... ·i----~------~------.:---~ ..... -.... . Landscaping :: 3 o:e-: 0.0000 : 3 ~e-: 0 0000 ' 0 0000 : 0 0000 : : 0 0000 : 0 0000 t : 6 gg~oe-: 6 ggo~e-I D 0000 : : 7 4go~e- ' I I I Total 1.39008· 0.0000 3 2000&-0.0000 0.0000 003 004 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumos and Emernencv Generatorli 0.0000 0.0000 0 .0000 Days/Year Horse Power 6 ,9000&-6.9000e· 0.0000 004 004 Load Factor Fuel Type 7.4000e- OM ATTACHMENT 2, Page 270 of 293 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18of18 Date : 3/15120 .19 3:46 PM Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Summer Equipment Type Hours/Day Hors<1 Power Load Fact0< Fuel Type Eq ul pmenl Type Number Hea t lnpuliOily Heat lnp-LJl/Ye<!r ' Bo ller Riiling Ftlel Type User Defined Equi pment Equ lpmen(Typa Number- 11.0 Vegetation ATTACHMENT 2, Page 271of293 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016 .3 .2 Page 1 of 23 Date: 3/15/2019 3:48 PM 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Climate Zone 13 Utility Company Southern California Edison C02 Intensity 702.44 (lb/MWhr) Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Annual Size 3,15 Wind Speed (mis) CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) Verdugo Street Beautification Orange County, Annual Metric Lot Acreage 1000sqft 0.07 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 30 Operational Year 2019 0.029 N20 Intensity 0,006 (lb/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use - Floor Surface Area 3,150.00 Construction Phase -Demolition of existing hardscape, site preparation and project implementation assumed to occur simultaneously Grading - Demolition - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -SCAQMD Rule 403 Population 0 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 272 of 293 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 23 Date: 3/15/2019 3:48 PM Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Annual Table Name I Column Name I Default Value I New Value ... _ .. -:~:~:~~~~~:;~:;:~~:;~~-. _. _ .. ~ .. :~:~~~~~:::·::e;~~~:~~~~~;dn .. :----------.-~------------! ............ ~~ ...... • • • • •. : : : : :: : ~b'.~~~s~r~~~~~~~·:~~: ::::::] ::: : : :: : : : : ~~~:~a:~::::::::::: =~~~~~----~~~----=~=4 ::: : : : : : : : :~~~~ :: : : : ::: : : : tblConstructionPhase : NumDays : 5.00 1 75.00 : : : : : : : :~;~~~:~:~~~~~;~:~~:: : : : : : t : : : : : : : : : ~~~~~~;;;!~:: : : : : : : : +~=~~~~=~~~~~---=~~~~t : : : : : : : : : ~;;~;;1:9: : : : : : : : : : ............................. " ............................. -&---------------------4 ............. -.. -........ . • • . • • • • l~'.~~n.s'.r~~~~n-~h-a_s~ ..•••.. i ......... ~~~~~:~d-~~l~ ••••••••• i___---~~~~=----------4 ......... :'.2_1:~~1·9· •••.••••. tblConstructionPhase : PhaseEndDate : 312912019 1 912712019 ... :. :::~:~~::::~ ... :F :~~~~::-::::: :~:=~·:;-;::==:t.: ~;;;:: :. : lblConslructionPhase PhaseStartDale 312912019 6115/2019 2.0 Emissions Summary ATTACHMENT 2, Page 273 of 293 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod ,2016 .3.2 Page 3 of 23 Date: 3/15/2019 3:48 PM Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Annual 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx Year 2019 0 ,0990 0 9561 Maximum 0,0990 0.9561 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx Year 2019 " 0.0990 0 .9560 Maximum 0.0990 0 .9560 ROG NOx Percent 0,00 0,00 Reduction co S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 PM10 tons/yr Q 753Q t 1 37QQe-I 0 0343 0 0506 : 003 : 0 .7539 1.3700e-0 .0343 0,0506 003 co S02 Fugilive Exhaust PM10 PM10 tons/yr 0.7539 : 1 .3700e-0 0170 0 0506 003 0,7539 1.370De-0.0170 0.0506 003 co 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 PM10 0.00 0.00 50.52 0 ,00 PM10 Tola! Fugitive Exhaust PM2 5 PM2 5 Q 0849 I 5 89009-4 0,0474 : 003 : 0.0849 5.8900e-0.0474 003 PM10 Fugitive Exhaust Total PM2.5 PM2 5 0 0676 : 3 350De-: 0 0474 003 0.0676 3.3500e-O.o474 003 PM10 Fugitive Exhaust Total PM2.5 PM2.5 20.43 -43.12 0,00 PM2 ,5 Tola I 0,0533 0.0533 PM25 Total 0 0507 0,0507 PM2.5 Tolal 4.79 Bio-C02 NBio· C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e MT/yr 00000 : 1206018: 1206018: 0 0265 0 0000 : 121 3143 ' ' 0.0000 120.6018 120.6018 0.0285 0,0000 121 .3143 8io-C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e MT/yr 0 0000 : 120 6016 : 120 6016 : 0 0265 0 0000 : 12 1.3141 . 0,0000 120,6016 120.6016 0 ,0285 0 .0000 121.3141 Bio· C02 NBio·C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e 0,00 0,00 0.00 0 ,00 0 ,00 0.00 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 274 of 293 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016 .3.2 Page 4 of 23 Date: 3/15/2019 3:48 PM Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Annual Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 2 6-15-2019 9-14-2019 0-9240 0 ,9240 3 9-15-2019 9-30-2019 0 1340 0 1340 Highest 0 9240 0 9240 2.2 Overall Operational Un mitigated Qpe ratlona l C.9 so:a Calegory , Eic~nuoj PM10 tons/yr PMIO Tola I ExliaU!il PM25 F'M 2.6 Tolal Bio-·c .02 NBio-C02 Tolal C02 CH4 MT/yr Area :: 2 .5gg 4 oe-: 0 ,0000 : 4 .ogg~e-! 0 ,0000 : a 0000 : 0,0000 ! : 0.0000 : 0.0000 I 0.0000 : ~°"' : S~G-: 0.0000 : 0.0000 : e ogg 5 oe- -.. E~;rgy · -. ::OoOoOf-o~OoOO~O.OOoOf 0 .0000 -tom-r -a-oooot---r a oaaa ;--000aa1·0 OOOa···t-oOoOO-tom-t -o-0000 -f-aOoOO-t · 0 OOOa· - •l I : : --~---~-----.;_ ___ _.: ____ ~-------l • • • • • • -~ I .;_ _____ l_ ___ ._.i. _ '"4 • • • • • · · M~biie ... · · •. o 0000 OOoOO -:---O.OoOoT -0.0000 0.0000 : o 0000 : o 0000 : 0.0000 : o 0000 : o 0000 1 o 0000 : o 0000 o 0000 : o 0000 : o 0000 : o 0000 •J I I I I I • I I .. -. -........ ~-·-·--·~-----.:-.----..:-----~----~·--·-~-----.:....--.--..:---4----·-----.......... -~--·-.:---_.;......-----.:...---.:.. -..... . Wasle •t ' I I I I 0.0000 I 0 _0000 • I 0.0000 I 0 ,0000 1 0 ,0000 • 0 ,0000 I 0 0000 I 0 0000 I 0 ,0000 I 0 0000 •1 ' I t I I I I I I I I I I I U ' 1 j I I I I I I I I I I I .. I I I I I I I I I I I I I • --. W;t~r----::---·~----·--i-----.-~------:-------:-oooOo---:--o-OoOO~------~-o-OoOo--:--o~000-1 · 0 OOOo· -~0000:-oOoOo-~OOoOO -~~. 0 OOOo". ··1 I I 4 t I I I t I I I I I I :: : : : : : : : ! : : : : : : Total 2.5000e· 0.0000 4 .0000e-0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 e.ooooe-e.ooooe-0.0000 0.0000 e.ooooe. 004 005 005 005 005 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 275 of 293 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 2.2 Overall Operational Mitigated Operational ROG NOx Category co S02 Page 5 of 23 Date: 3/15/201g 3:48 PM Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Annual Fugitive Exhaust PM10 PM10 tons/yr PM10 Total Fugitive Exhaust PM25 PM25 PM2 ,5 Total Bio-C02 NBlo-C02 Total C02 MT/yr CH4 N20 C02e Area :: 2 5gg2e-: o 0000 : 4.ogg 5 oe-: 0.0000 ! o 0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 : o 0000 o 0000 : B ogg~e-: e .ogg~e-: 0 ,0000 : o 0000 ; B ogg 5 oe- -.......... -·-·-~----.--1. ---.. -:---~-----~----·----~ ............ . Energy :: 0 .0000 : o 0000 : o DODO : 0.0000 : o 0000 0.0000 -: o 0000 : 0.0000 l o 0000 : o 0000 o 0000 : 0.0000 : a 0000 : O 0000 ......... -...... "' .. i:-·---·-L-----~-----l----.:------l-----4-----..:-----~-----4---... ~·J ........ ·' : : . Mobile ::· 0 ,0000 : 0.0000 : 0 _0000 : 0 ,0000 : 0,0000 : 0 _0000 : 0,0000 : 0 .. 0000 : 0,0000 : O 0000 t 0 .0000 : a 0000 -a:oooo--0,000o-Q000'0'7. Q QQQo· • . . . Wa~ie .... §-------~-----~------~-----~-----+-o-Oo00-1--o~OoOO-~----+-o-OoOO+-ooooo-·t1 -00000' .. : o oooo+-00000 : 0.0000 : o 0000 : . 0 OOOo·. •• I I I t I t I I I • I I I I •• I i I I i I I I I ; I I I I H I o I I t t o I I 1 I t I t ........... ,,....._.--..-.. -·-------------~-·--------·_......---... -------~--... --....... -.---------;-----·-··--,. .. , . , , , . Waler •• • • • ~ • O 0000 1 0,0000 • ; O 0000 • O 0000 I 0.0000 : o 0000 ~ 0.0000 : 0.0000 • 0.0000 1 0_0000 Total 2.5000e-0.0000 4 ,0000e-0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 8.0000e-8.0000e-0.0000 0,0000 8.0000e- 004 005 005 005 ROG Percent 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase I Number Phase Name NOx 0 ,00 co 802 Fugitive PM10 0.00 0 .00 o.oo I Phase Type Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 0.00 0 .00 I Sl~rt ·Date I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 ·a10-C02 PM2.5 o.oo End Date PM2.5 Total 0.00 0.00 0,00 INum .Da ys I Nuni ·Days.I Week I :Demolition :Demolition !6/15/2019 iS/2812019 : 5! 75! NBlo-C02 Tolal C02 CH4 0.00 0.00 0.00 Pnase ·oesetlpt(on -------~ ------------.. -. -. ---. --·-----------------------1----------4-------4------4----4-------------------. ----- 2 :site Preparation :Site Preparation !6/15/2019 !9/27/2019 : 5! 75! -·--• --~-------------• -------· ·-1---------1--------1-------' 1---4-------------------------3 :Paving :Paving :e/15/2019 !9127/2019 • 5: 75: 005 N20 C02e 0,00 0.00 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 276 of 293 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016 .3.2 Page 6 of 23 Date: 3/15/2019 3:48 PM Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Annual Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 37.5 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0.07 Residential Indoor: O; Residential Outdoor: O; Non-Residential Indoor: O; Non-Residential Outdoor: O; Striped Parking Area : 0 (Architectural Coating -sqft) OffRoad Equipment Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I AA1oun1 I Usage Hoots I Horse Power I Load Factor ~~"'.~9 ••••••••• _ ••••• _. _. __ • _. ;~~~-e-n~~:~ ~~~a:_~i:~r~--------L---------------~l-. _______ e_.~~L ------------~l •••••••••• _o:~ ::;::;~Li~~-··············· -l~~~~z~~~n~~~~~~~~~~---------~---------------~j --· ·-· ----~:~~~---·-------1~~~ · · · · · · · · -· .::~; ................................ -....... ---.... i-----------.. ---..... -................. -~--------·-.. -----................ -......... ~------------'-.......... -.......... -· .. Pav·ing ;Pavers : 11 7.oo: 130! 0.42 ~~~~~:::: :: : : : : : : : : :: : : : : : :: 1 ~~~~,~:::::::::::::::::::::t ~::::::::::::~r ::::::::7:~~=::.--==~~~ :: : : : ::: : : :~·~ ~~::;::. · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · .1;:~:;~~7d~;~~ckhoes ....... ~-----:·--------~t--·· · -· · -~~~~-------2 ::; • • • • .... • • -~:~ .......................................... -.... -...... ; ........................................................... ___ ~-------------·---·---.... -------t---------" ...... .-................. . Paving ;Tractorslloaders/Bad<hoes : 1 7.00: 97: 0.37 ......................... -.... ---. . .. . _____ ........__. _________ . -·---·-·--..,.._. _______ ,. ....................... .. Siie Preparation ;Tractorslloaders/Bacl<hoes 1 ! 8.00: 97: 0.37 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Number Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Hauling Vehicle Class Vehicle Class ATTACHMENT 2, Page 277 of 293 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 23 Date: 3/15/2019 3:48 PM Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Annual Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads Clean Paved Roads 3.2 Demolition -2019 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG ' NOx co Category 502 Fugilive ExhausL PM10 PM10 tons/yr PM10 Total Fugitive Exhaust PM2 5 PM2 5 Fugitive Dust ;: 1 8,1000e-1 0 ,0000 • B.1000e-• 1 2000e-0 0000 : oo4: :004:004 •• I • I I • . -... --. ---.,,--.------·--~---..,.----.... -....----~ ---Off-Road .. a 0357 ' o 3227 ' o 2804 • 4,5000e-• 1 a 0201 0 0201 I . • 0 0192 I QQ4 : Total 0.0357 0.3227 0.2884 4.SOOOe-8.1000e-0.0201 0.0210 1.2000e-0.0192 004 004 004 PM2 ,5 Total Bio-C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 MT/yr CH4 N20 C02e 1 2g~e-f a 0000 : 0,0000 : o 0000 : o 0000 : o 0000 : a 0000 • I I I I < ---·--·. ----. -·---..---------------.... --.. -- 0 .0192 i 00000 I 394509 I 394509 : 7 .sgg~e-: 00000 I 39.6389 I ' ' 0.0193 0.0000 39.4509 39.4509 7.5200e· 0,0000 39.6389 003 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 278 of 293 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod ,2016.3.2 Page 8 of 23 Date: 3/15/2019 3:48 PM 3.2 Demolition -2019 Unmi ti gated Construction Off-Site Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Annual ROG NOx co $02 Fugilive Exhaust PM10 Total Fugllive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e PM10 PM10 PM25 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr :: 3.0000e-: 1.0700&-: 2 .6000e-: 0.0000 : 6.0000e-: 0.0000 : 6 00000-: 2 OOOOe· : 0 0000 : 2 OOOOe-t 0 0000 : 0 .2722 ::005:003:004: :005: :005:005: :0051 : Hauling 0 2122 I 3.0000&-I 0 .0000 1 0_272Q I 005 : 1 . -. V~n·d~; ... ;--o-OOoOfO~OoOo-1-0-0-oo-o-fOOOOo-ro.oaOO_f_o_Oo00-1--a-Oo00-1 --a-:OoOOf-o 0000 : -0.0000 7! . 0 OOOa'". ~ 0 .0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 :-0:00001 · 0 OOOa· •t I I I t f I I I I . I I I I • • .. • • • • • • • • • ----------.. -----------------------------------------_,...------.. • • • •"" • ·---__.,-----..--------------T • • • • • • Worker :: 1 s;g~e-: 1 1tio°~e-: o 0121 : 4,ogg~o-: 4 1:300-: 3 ogg~e-l 4 .1:~e-: 1 o~g~e-: 3,oggie-• 1 .15g~e-l 0.0000 • 3.6811 : 3.6811 : g o0og 5 oe-: o_oooo 3 6833 .., 1 o 1 I I I I I Total 1.6000e-2.2100e-0.0130 4,0000e-4 .1800e-3.0000e-4.2000e-1 ,1100e-3.0000e-1.1400e-0.0000 3.9532 3 .9532 1 .2000e-0,0000 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx co 502 Fugilive E"xhaust PM10 PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive Exhaust PM2 5 PM2 5 PM2 5 Total 004 Bio-C02 NBk>· C02 Total C02 CH4 Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust ~ 1 : 3 2gg 4 oe-: 0,0000 : 3.2g~e-: s_og~e-o 0000 ~ s _:e-i 0.0000 ~ 0.0000 ~ o 0000 .......... --... -:------~-,-.--.:-·---.:-------.:---~-----:--.:----T--Off-Road •• 0 0357 0 .3227 j 0 2884 I 4 .50000-I 0.0201 0.0201 oo,g2-:-o-019;-11 . 0 000c) ·:-39450Bf3Q4500 I : 004 I f o I ' 0 0000 : : 7 5200a-: 003 ' I ' Total 0.0357 0.3227 0 .2884 4.5000&-3.2000&-0 .0201 0.0205 5.0000&-0.0192 0.0193 0.0000 39,4508 39.4508 7.5200e- 004 004 005 003 N20 0 0000 0 0000 0.0000 3.9 562 C02e : 0 0000 3g 6389 39.6389 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 279 of 293 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 23 Date: 3/15/2019 3:48 PM 3.2 Demolition -2019 Mitigated Co nst ruction Off-Si te ROG NOx Category co S02 Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Annual Fugitive Exhaust PM10 PM10 tons/yr PM10 Tolal Fugitive Exhaust PM2 .5 PM2 5 PM25 Total Bio-C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 MT/yr CH4 N20 C02e Hauling •• 3,0000e-• 1 0700e-• 2 6000e-• O 0000 • 4 OOOOe-1 O 0000 • 5 .0000e-• 1.0000e-• O 0000 • 2.0000e-I o 0000 • 0.2722 • 0_2722 • 3.0000e-• OLOOOO • 0.2729 ::005:003:004: :005: :oas:oos: :aos_ : : :oos: : -----------::----~--· -·-~----.:.------4---.:---.:-------:---.:---.:..--.--J -----.. -:-------.:-------.:-------.:-------..:. ------ Vendor :: O 0000 : 0 .0000 : O 0000 : O 0000 : O 0000 : O 0000 : O 0000 : O 0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 i O 0000 : 0.0000 : O 0000 : 0 0000 : 0 0000 : O 0000 ...... -......... -::-------..:-------..:-------..:-------..:-------..:-------..:-------.:-------.:-------~-------· ........... :-------.:-------..:-------..:-------.:.. --.. . Worker .. 1.5700e-• 1 .1400e-• o.0127 • 4 _0000e-• 2-6900e-• 3 .0000e-• 2 .7200e-• 7.4CJOOe-• 3_0000e-• 7.7000e-& 0.0000 3.6811 • 3.6811 • 90000e-• 0.0000 • 3.6833 .. 003:003: ;005:003:005;003:004!oos:oo4i 1 oos' ' Total 1.6000e-2.21 OOe-0.0130 4.0000e-2.7300e-3.0000e-2 .7700e-7~5000e-3.0000e-7.9000e-0.0000 3.9532 3.9532 1 .2000e-0.0000 3.9562 003 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 3.3 Site Preparation -2019 Unmitlgated Construction On-Site ROG NOx co Category Fugitive Dust :: . . ' S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 PM10 tons/yr PM10 Total 00199 : 00000 : 00199 --.. ----... --·::-.----~---~----T---·--~-Off-Road •· 0 _0270 0.3344 • O 1553 • 3 7000e-• O 0138 O 0138 •I : 004 : Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 PM2 5 PM2 5 Total Bio-C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 MT/yr CH4 N20 C02e • 2.1 sooe-• o 0000 • 2.1 sooe-I 0 .0000 • 0 .0000 1 0 .0000 ' o _oooo • 0 .0000 • o ~oooo :003: :003 : : : : : . .:-~---·-.. -------~...:.--~---.-.!--.:. ----. -. . . 00127 I 00127 I 00000 328345 I 328345 I 00104 I 0 .0000 I 330942 Total 0.0270 0.3344 0.1553 3 .7000e-0.0199 0.0138 0.0337 2.1500e-0.0127 0 .0148 0.0000 32_8345 32.8345 0.0104 0.0000 33~0942 004 003 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 280 of 293 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod .2016.3.2 Page 10 of 23 Date : 3/15/2019 3:48 PM 3.3 Site Preparation -2019 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx co Category S02 Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Annual Fugitive Exhaust PM10 PM10 tons/yr PM10 Tola I Fugllive Exhaust PM2.5 PM2 5 PM2 .5 Total Bio-C02 NBlo-C02 Total C02 MT/yr CH4 Hauling :: 0.0000 : 0 0000 : 0 .0000 0 0000 0 0000 : 0 .0000 : 0 0000 : 0 0000 : 0 0000 : 0 0000 f 0 0000 : 0 0000 : 0 0000 : 0 0000 .. I I I I J. I N20 C02e 0 0000 : 0 0000 •• f I 1 o o I I i o I I .. -.. ----. -.. -.---·-·--------.,--·-·-----...---·----------... ---------·-..-. -----.. ·--·----......----------<----·-......... - Vendor :~ 0 0000 : 0 0000 : 0 0000 0 0000 O 0000 : 0 .0000 : 0 0000 : 0 .0000 : 0 0000 : O 0000 i 0,0000 : 0,0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 0,0000 : 0 0000 •• I I I I I ! I I I • t I · · · w~;k~; · · · :-·7eoo0e~-:-s.100o-;:;-6-.J-4~~2-oo_oo_a:-~.060o~-~i:OOo07;i207o0&--:-5-s_o_oo-e:-~;-_-oo-oo-&--:"-s6aOO;.-•I .. O.OOOcj ':-1,84"05-i 1 a4as , s .OOoOe-~0000-... · 1041·1- :: 004 : Q04 : 00~ : ()05 : 003 : 00S : 003 I 004 : oos : 004 : 005 I I I • I I o I Total 7.BOOOa-s .1oooa-6.3400.,. 2.ooooa-2.0600e· 1.ooooa-2.07008-s .soooa-1.ooooa-5.soooe-0.0000 1.8405 1.8405 5,00008· 0,0000 1.8417 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx co S02 Category Fugitive Oust :: Fugitive Exhaust PM10 PM10 tonsfyr PM10 Total Fugitive Exhaust PM2 .5 PM2 5 PM2.5 Total Bio-C02 NBlo-C02 Total C02 MT/yr CH4 N20 C02e : 7 .7500o-: 00000 : 7.7500~: B4000e-: 0 .0000 : B4000e-4 00000 : 00000 : 00000 : 00000 : 00000 : 0 ,0000 ---r---,--.:----.:-------1-,--~=--~------.L~:_.;_~ _ __;__~~~ --. -. --~.:_. ___ _:_ __ J__--l. -. -... ··-orr~R.;ad---~-0.0270 0 ,3344 0 ,1553 : 3 .1gg40~: 00138 I 00138 : I 00127 I 0.0127 i 00000 • 328345 I 32,8345 I 00104 ' 00000 I 33.0042 ' . Total 0.0270 0,3344 0.1653 3,70008· 7.7500•-0.0138 0.0215 8.40008-0.0127 0.0135 0.0000 32.8345 32.8345 0.0104 0.0000 33.0942 004 003 004 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 281of293 CalEEMod Versi on: CalEEMod .2016 .3.2 Page 11 of 23 Date : 3/15/2019 3:48 PM 3.3 Site Preparation -2019 Mitig ated Cons truction Off-Site ROG NOx Category co 502 Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Annual Fugitive Exhaust PM10 PM10 lonslyr PM10 Total Fugitive Exhaust PM25 PM25 PM2.5 Total Bio-C02 NSio-C02 Total C02 MTlyr CH4 N20 C02e Hauling :: 0 _,0000 : a 0000 : o 0000 : O 0000 : 0 ,0000 : 0 0000 : o 0000 ! 0 ,0000 : 0 0000 : 0 0000 0 0000 : o 0000 : 0 0000 : o 0000 : 0 .0000 : 0 0000 :: : : : ! : : : : : t : : : : : ... v;;d~; ... ::--oOoOO-~OoOo-~--o-:OaOO-:-O:OoOO ~O -~-o-0'0"00700oOO--:-OQQOO·-~-oaOo--:--ooooa-1 ·0 OOOo'" -;-o-OoOO~-oOOoO io-OoOO~o007 -0 OO Oa· :: : : : : : : : : : I : : : : : ......... .._ ... ::-..----..:--.-~---~---.:----.:---~-----.:---.:----~-------... -. -... -~.:--~-----.:----.:. ......... . Worker •• 7 8000e-• 5 70000-• 6 34000-• 2,00000-• 1 34 00 e-• 1 OOOOe-• 1.3600e-• 3 7000e-• 1 OOOOe-3 8000e-t O 0000 • 1 8405 • 1 6405 • 5 OOOOe-• 0 ,0000 • 1 8417 --~-·-;-;-·-;-~-;--I ~ ;-~ Total 7,8000e-5,7000e-6.3400&· 2.0000e-1.3400e-1.0000e-1.3600e-3 .7000e· 1 .0000e-3.BOOOe-0,0000 1.8405 1.8405 5.0000e-0.0000 1.8417 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 3.4 Paving -2019 Unm itigated Construction On-Si te ROG N Ox co S02 Category Fugll1ve Exhaust PM10 PM10 Ions/yr PM10 To la l Fugitive ~xhaust PM2 ,5 PM2 5 PM2 5 Total 005 Blo-C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 C H4 MT/yr OH-Road :: o 0 3 11 : o 2942 : a 2 eeo : 4 ,20000-: : o 0166 ! o 0166 : : o 01 54 : 0 ,0154 o 0000 : 35 8967 : 35 8967 : o 01 03 •• ' ' ' 004 ' ' ' ' ' ' l ' ' ' · · · p;;i ~9-• • • ::-a.oooa-~·---:----·+-------:---~00000-f--o-oaoa -:-·----;--oOOoO ~-o-aooo -·a OOOct ·:0-0o0o -+--00o00~-o-oooo •• o f 0 I I I I I I I I I •• I I o I I I t I t I I I •• I I I o ' < I o I o I O To1al 0.0 311 0.2942 0.,2 680 4 .ZOOOe-0 .0166 0 .0168 0 .0154 0 .0154 0.0000 35.8967 35.8987 0.0103 004 N20 C02e 0 0000 : 361532 0,0000 36.1532 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 282 of 293 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 23 Date: 3/15/2019 3:48 PM 3.4 Paving -2019 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx co S02 Category Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Annual Fugilive Exhausl PM10 PM10 tons/yr PM10 Total Fugitive Exhaust PM2 5 PM2 5 PM2 5 Total Bio-C02 NBio-C02 Tofal C02 MT/yr Crl4 N20 C02e Hauling :: Q QQQQ : Q QQQQ : Q QQQQ : Q QQQQ : Q QQQQ : Q QQQQ : Q QQQQ : Q,QQQQ : Q QQQQ : Q,QQQQ Q QQQQ I Q QQQQ Q QQQQ : Q QQQQ : Q QQQQ : Q QQQQ I I I I I I I I I I I " • • I I I I • I I I I • • • ··········-.,------~------.-------~---------------~---------------.-------~--------,.--------.-------~~~~~~-------------------~·-···· Vendor :: o 0000 : o 0000 ~ o 0000 l 0.0000 ~ o 0000 i o 0000 ~ o 0000 : 0.0000 ~ 0.0000 ~ 0 .0000 I 0 .0000 ~ 0.0000 o 0000 : 0.0000 : o_oooo : 0.0000 ---w~~k~; .... ::2a2ooe-~.oeoo-;;~ .. 7.0000e-I 7.410o-;_--:s:ooa"0;"'77.46o~ooe-I 5 OOOOe--20100;-.... a oooa· ., 6 6259 6 6259 ' 1600c);~ooo: · 6.6300" :: 003 : 003 : 005 : 003 I 005 I 003 I 003 I 005 003 I 004 : Total 2.8200e· 2.0600e-0.0228 7.0000e-7.4100e-5.0000a-7.4600a-1.9700a-5.0000e-2.0100e· 0.0000 6.6259 6L6259 1.6000e-0 .0000 6-6300 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 004 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx co $02 Category Fugitive Exhaust PM10 PM10 tons/yr PM10 Tolal Fugitive Exhaust PM2 ,5 PM2 5 PM2 .5 Total Bio-C02 NBio-C02 Tolal C02 MT/yr CH4 N20 C02e Off-Road .. 0 0311 I 0.2942 I 0 .2680 I 4 2000e-I : 0 0166 : 0 0166 : ' 0 0154 I 0 .0154 l 0.0000 • 35 8967 I 35 8967 I 0 0103 I 0.0000 • 361532 •I : : : 004 : I I I : : : : : : : ff I I I I I I I I I I I I t I .. ---.... -........ ---·------------.,,---·-.,-----·-·-·-·----·--------------·-----·-~-------· -.. -----,...-----·-----------------... -.. -.... -Paving ~ 0.0000 I I • 0.0000 ' 0.0000 • I 0 0000 I 0,0000 I 0 0000 • 0 0000 : 0 0000 I 0 0000 I 0 0000 I 0 0000 I ' Total 0.0311 0.2942 0.2680 4.2000e-0 .0166 0.0166 0.0154 0.0154 0.0000 35.8967 35.8967 0.0103 0.0000 36.1532 004 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 283 of 293 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod .2016.3.2 Page 13 of 23 Date : 3/15/2019 3:48 PM 3.4 Paving • 2019 Mi tigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx co 502 Category Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Annual Fugitive Exhaust PM10 PM10 tons/yr PM10 Tatel Fugitive Exhaust PM25 PM25 PM2.5 Tolal Bio· C02 NBio-C02 T olal C02 MT/yr CH4 N20 C02e Hauling :: O 0000 : 0 ,0000 : O 0000 : O 0000 : 0 ,0000 : O 0000 : O 0000 : O 0000 : O 0000 : o 0000 O 0000 : O 0000 : O 0000 : o 0000 : 0 ,0000 : O 0000 •• I I I I I I I I I I I o ! I I .............. •· ::-----.:-.------~-----.:------.:----.:-----..:--------.:-----~---.:.. .. -.... ---J ....... ·~-..:--------.:....------..:-----.:. ..... - Vendor :: 0.0000 : 0 .0000 : 0 .0000 : 0.0000 : 0 ,0000 : o 0000 : a 0000 : a 0000 : O 0000 : o ODDO I o 0000 : o 0000 : o 0000 o 0000 : 0 .0000 : o 0000 •o o + I I I I I I I I I I o ••• w·o~k~; • -• :.-28200~~"!2'060Q;:-·~-o022B0.0000;:---:-4-e4aoe---:-500aOe:--:-;,ego0-;:--:-13400e::-;500oo;:----1-3BoO;-. 0 OOOa· ·55259-s 6259 1 .6000-;::-~oo~. 6 6300· ·-:-: :-:-:-·-:-:---: ' I I t I O O O • Total 2.82008· 2.06008· 0.0228 7.0000e-4 .84008-5.00008-4 .89008-1.3400e-S.OOOOe-1.3800e-0.0000 6.6259 6.6259 1.6000e-0.0000 6.6300 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 004 4.0 Operational Detail • Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ATTACHMENT 2, Page 284 of 293 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 23 Date: 3/15/2019 3:48 PM Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Annual ROG I NOx I co I S02 I Fugilive I Exhausl I PM10 I Fugitive I Exhaust I PM2 5 PM10 PM10 Tolal PM2 5 PM2.5 Total Bio-C02 l NBio-C021 Total C021 CH4 l N20 I C02e Category tonsfyr MT/yr Miligaled :; 0 0000 : 0,0000 : O 0000 : 0,0000 : Q_QQOO : 0 ,0000 : 0.0000 : 0 .0000 : 0.0000 : 0.DOOO • 0 .0000 ! 0.DOOO ; 0 .0000 : O.ODOO : 0 .0000 : 0.0000 --... --.... :., ... ____ ..,_l_ _____ .. _:__ .. .,._ ...... l ---.... ..,:. ...... ___ ..:. .............. l ----l ------l------l-------1-------~------l------l------l------l-. ---- Unmitigated a1 0.0000 . 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0 0000 . 0 0000 • 0 ,0000 0 0000 0 0000 . 0,0000 . 0 0000 • 0 0000 0 0000 0,0000 0 0000 0 0000 0 0000 4.2 Trip Summary Information ., Aye1age Dally Trip Rate I Unmitigated I Mitigated Land Use I Weekday I Saturday !Sunday I Annual VMT I Annual VMT Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 ' 0.00 I o.oo . Total I 0.00 I 0.00 I 0.00 I I 4.3 Trip Type Information I Miles I Trip% I Trip Purpose % Land Use I H-W or C-W ( H-S or C-C I H-0 or C-NW I H-W or C-W( H-S or C-C ( H-OorC-NW I Primary I Diverted I Pass-by Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces : 16.60 8.40 6.90 . 0.00 0.00 o.oo 0 0 : 0 . 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LOA LDT1 LOTZ MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0,552373; 0.044229: 0.211123: 0.119112: 0.017503: 0.005797: 0 024455: 0.015685: 0.001637: 0.001633: 0.004830: 0_000583: 0.001041 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Enerqy Use: N ATTACHMENT 2, Page 285 of 293 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016 .3.2 Page 15 of 23 Date: 3/15/2019 3:48 PM Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Annual 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG I NOx I co I S02 I Fugilive I e.fwu.t I PM 10 PM10 PM10 Total I Fugi11ve I Exhaust I PM2 5 PM2.5 PM2 5 Total N20 I C02e ron.....,. Electricity : O 0000 : O 0000 : : O 0000 : 0,0000 O 0000 : 0,0000 : O 0000 : O 0000 : 0 0000 : 0 0000 Mitigated • , , , , , , , , , •• I I I I I I I I ' I I 0 I I .... E1~~t;i~ity· .... ----~: ----~---:ooooo-:--ooaOO--:--~Q0070~oOo01. 0 OOOa· ·:-o.00oo--:--a-OaOO~--o-OoO~aOD:'. 0 OOOa·. Unmitigated :: : , , : : : : : : I : : : : : .. -. --.. --. ~----~----.:---.:------~--~---~------:----.:----.:.--.----l · ..... " ... :--.----.:-.---..:-... ----..:---·-~ ....... . . ·N-~;~~~~'.·~~ __ t_:·::o:_L:·::o:_L:-::o:_t :·::o:_i_ _____ i_:-::o:_t:·::o:_l_ _____ l_:·::o:_i_::::o_J _: ~:~-.L~::o:_L:::o:_t:::o:_i_:::o:-1.: :~~o .. NaturalGas •• O 0000 0 ,0000 O 0000 O 0000 O 0000 0 0000 O 0000 0 ,0000 0 0000 0 ,0000 0 0000 0 0000 0 0000 0 0000 Unmiligated 5.2 Energy by Land Use -NaturalGas Unml!lqa!ed NaturalGa ROG NOx co s Use Land Use RBTU/yr Other Non-0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces : Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 PM10 tonslyr 0.0000 0 0000 0.0000 0,0000 PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 Total PM25 PM25 Tolal MT/yr 0 0000 0 .0000 0 .0000 0 0000 0 0000 0 0000 0 0000 0 0000 0,0000 0,0000 0 .0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C02e 0 0000 0,0000 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 286 of 293 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016 .3.2 5.2 Energy by Land Use -NaturalGas Mitigated Natural Ga ROG NOx co s Use Land Use kB TU/yr Other Non-0 _0000 0.0000 00000 Asphalt Surfaces : Total 0 .0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.3 Energy by Land Use -Electricity Unmlligated Electricity TotalC02 CH4 N20 Use Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Other Non-0 0000 0 0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces : Tola I 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0000 Page 16 of 23 · Date : 3/15/2019 3:48 PM Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Annual 502 Fugilive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Blo-C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e PM10 PM10 Total PM25 PM25 Total tons/yr MT/yr 0 0000 0 0000 00000 0 0000 0 0000 00000 0 .0000 0 0000 0 0000 0 .0000 00000 0.0000 0.0000 0 .0000 0.0000 0 ,0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 ,0000 C02e 0,0000 0.0000 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 287 of 293 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 5.3 Energy by Land Use -Electricity Mi tigated Ef<IC\ltoity Tol•I Co1. CH•I u ... lal)<IUoe N20 Page 17 of 23 Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Annual COZo OlherNon-• 0.0000 0 0000 0.0000 0.0000 Aephelt Surfaces : Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 .0000 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area PM10 F>Ml O TolOI Pl.(2 5 PM2-5 Toliil fl,OG I NOk I co I $01. I Fugl!l•o I EJ\hno!f I PM 10 I Fug 1llvo I El<houo1 I PM2,5 ·Cologory Date: 3/15/2019 3:48 PM MT/yr MIHgnlod •• 2.SOOOo-• D.0000 • 4.0000. • 0 .0000 ' ' 0.0000 • 0.0000 • ' 0,0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 • aooooo-• 8 0000• 1 o 0000 • o 0000 • 8.C)OOOa· ::DCM ! !ooo ! : : : ! : : t :000:005: ! :005 -..... -.... ::..------..:.------~-------:..------~------~------4------~------~------4------·' ........... -~------4------~------~------...:. --.. --. Unmitigated •• 2.600<J4.. • 0 .0000 • 4 0000. • 0 ,0000 • • 0.0000 • o 0000 ' • 0 .0000 ' D.0000 • o 0000 • 8 OOOOe-' 8 0000&-• o 0000 • 0.0000 • 8 OOOOe- •• 004; :oos · ' ' • • "oos"oos : '005 .. ATTACHMENT 2, Page 288 of 293 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 6.2 Area by Subcategory Unmitigated ROG NOx SubCalegory co S02 Page 18 of 23 Date: 3/15/2019 3:48 PM Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Annual Fugitive Exhausl PM10 PM10 tons/yr PM10 Total Fugitive Exhaust PM2 5 PM2 5 .PM2 .5 Total 810-C02 N810-C02 l olal C02 MT/yr CH4 N20 C02e Ar~~l=~~al :: 4 ogg 5 oe-: 1 : : o 0000 : 0 .0000 : : o 0000 : o ODDO 0 .0000 : o 0000 : o 0000 ! 0 ,0000 : a 0000 : o 0000 .. -.. --...... --.. ------...:.------..:---.:.----.:---~· ---..:----..:...-------l -.. -.. --... ~--.:------.:...------..;....._--.;. -........ .. c~r~~~~t~r ~ 2 o0aa°.i°~ ; : : ; ~ 0 .0000 ~ 0.0000 ~ ; o 0000 ~ o 0000 i 0.0000 ~ o 0000 ~ o 0000 ; 0.0000 ~ o 0000 ~ o 0000 • i_~~d-s~~Pj;9 • • :--a-OoOO--:--0 ,0000 ~-;:-~oaoo-~·---~-0:00o0-~o.00o0~----~-o-OoOO"':'"-OOOOO-l " 0 OOOa· "'!BOoOa;~aoooo~-o-:OaOO-:--c;~ocmo·-~ 8 "aOOOa: • :: : :aas: : : ; : ; : I :aas:oos; : :ao5 Total 2 .4000e-0.0000 4.0000e-0.0000 004 005 Mitigated ROG NOx co S02 Subcategory Tolal 2.4000e-0.0000 4.0000e-0.0000 004 005 7.0 Water Detail 0.0000 Fuglliva Exhaust PM10 PM10 tons/yr 0.0000 0.0000 PM10 Total 0 ,0000 0.0000 Fugitive Exhaust PM2 5 PM2_5 0 ~0000 0.0000 PM25 Total 0.0000 0.0000 e.ooooe-e.ooooe-0.0000 0,0000 8.0000e- 005 005 005 Bio-C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e MT/yr 0,0000 8.0000e-8.0000e-0.0000 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 005 005 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 289 of 293 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water Coo~ry tdi/v• Mitigated :: 0.0000 : o 0000 : 0 .0000 : 0.0000 •I I I I •I I I I · Aun-~1ti9~ted . ·--o.oooa-:-ooooa-:-o.ooo0-: · ooooa· · .. 7 .2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated lrid~"r/O\Jt CloorlfH •olo1(;02 .L•rid lJ&o Muoi Olhoi Non· 0/0 0 .0000 Asphalt Surfaces : T clill 0.0000 ()H< 'N~ "'/yf O.OOOll 0 .0000 0.0000 0.0000 Page 19 of 23 Date: 3/15/2019 3:48 PM Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Annual C0:2c O.QOOO 0.0000 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 290 of 293 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 7.2 Water by Land Use Mitigated Indoo r/Out To101coi docrU~o CH • N20 Lond U.oo Mgof MTfyr Other Non-010 0 0000 0,0000 0 .0000 Asphalt Surfaces : Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste CategorvfYear Mllig;:atOCI :: 0.0000 : 0,0000 : 0'.0000 : 0 0000 •1 I I I •I I I I --U~~iiig-ata-d --~ -0.0000--:---0.0000--:---O.OOoO-.... -O.OOOcj . Page 20 of 23 Date: 3/15/2019 3:48 PM Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Annual C02o 0 0000 0.0000 ATTACHMENT 2, Page 291of293 CalEEMod Version : CalEEMod .2016 .3 .2 Page 21 of 23 Date : 3/15/2019 3:48 PM Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Annual 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unm itigated "<'/8$1• Toto!C02 CH• N20 C02o Oiopoood Lor><IU8'1 IOOfi Mf/y! other Non· 0 ,0000 0 0000 00000 0 ,0000 Asphall Surfaces : Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitiga ted Woet DlOJlQ~I TololCo;? Cki\ 1'129 C02o ~and U•o '""" MTl)'r Other Non· 0.0000 0 0000 0 0000 0 0000 Asphell Surfaces : Total 0.0000 0.0000 0 .0000 0.0000 9.0 Operational Offroad ()\I rs/Day !'forse Power Fu81 Type ATTACHMENT 2, Page 292 of 293 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 23 Date: 3/15/2019 3:48 PM Verdugo Street Beautification -Orange County, Annual 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Numtiet AoufSIOay Hours/Year Horse Power load Faclor Fuel Type Equipment Type Number Hea t lnpuVOay Heat lnpullYear Boile r Rallng Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipmenl Type Numbe r 11.0 Vegetation ATTACHMENT 2, Page 293 of 293