Loading...
1998-0721_MD CONSTRUCTION GROUP_D5_Agenda Report 1 AGENDA ITEM July 21, 1998 TO: George Scarborough, City Manager FROM: William M. Huber, Director of Engineering&Building SUBJECT: Consideration of Award of Contract- City Bridge Repairs (MD Construction Group) (CIP No. 117) RECOMMENDATION By motion, award the contract for City Bridge Repairs to the low responsible bidder, MD Construction Group, in the amount of$113,170.00, and reject all other bids. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the documents on behalf of the City. A. Summary and Recommendation Bids were opened May 29, 1998, for City Bridge Repairs. The bids are valid until September 27, 1998, a period of 90 days from the opening date. Staff is recommending that City Council award the contract to the low responsible bidder, MD Construction Group, in the amount of $113,170.00, which includes the Additive Alternate bid for deck sealing. B. Background The City of San Juan Capistrano has the responsibility of inspection for maintenance purposes, as well as the maintenance work itself for bridge structures under its jurisdiction. The Department of Transportation(Caltrans) inspects City Bridges on behalf of the City as an on-going program, in accordance with the National Bridge Inspection Standards. Four bridges within the City have been identified as needing repairs. 1. Trabuco Creek, Rancho Viejo Road Bridge 2. Trabuco Creek, Del Obispo Street Bridge 3. San Juan Creek, La Novia Avenue Bridge 4. San Juan Creek, Camino Capistrano Bridge. Much of the work is proposed for nighttime hours to minimize or avoid, where possible, adverse traffic impacts that may occur because of heavy daytime traffic as required by City Council Policy No. 505. On the first three bridges (i.e., excluding Camino Capistrano Bridge), a penetrating deck sealer is desirable. This is an important item of work, however, because of its potential high cost, bids have been structured for this to be an additive alternate. The seal will prevent water penetration of the concrete bridge deck, which would cause deterioration of the structural reinforcement. This deterioration would result in an even higher repair cost at a later date. FOR 0ITY COMM AGM*, ,m D5 1 AGENDA ITEM. • July 21, 1998 Page 2 The base cost work and work hours are as follows: 1. Trabuco Creek, Rancho Viejo Road Bridge i) Repair Spalled Deck Concrete ii) Repair Approach Joint Seals iii) Repair Spalled Concrete Railing Daytime construction is to be performed here. Half width closures can be implemented without significant traffic impacts. The closest residence is 150' away on Imperial Drive. 2. Trabuco Creek, Del Obispo Street Bridge i) Repair Longitudinal Deck Joint ii) Repair Spalled Deck Concrete Nighttime construction is to be performed at this location. City Council Policy No. 505 requires nighttime construction on Del Obispo Street from Ortega Highway to Paseo Adelanto. This work is closer to residences than the policy requires. Some construction noise is anticipated for about four nights. The closest residence is 100' away on Via Tonado. 3. San Juan Creek, La Novia Avenue Bridge • i) Repair Approach Joint Seals ii) Repair Tube Railing Nighttime construction is to be performed at this location. Some construction noise is anticipated for about two nights. The closest residence is 400' away on the corner of Calle Arroyo. 4. San Juan Creek, Camino Capistrano Bridge i) Repair Median Joint Seal Nighttime construction is to be performed at this location as required.by City Council Policy No. 505. • `� ) AGENDA ITEM • July 21, 1998 Page 3 Bids were opened for City Bridge Repairs as follows: Bidder Base Bid Additive Alternate Total Bid Deck Seal MD Construction $68,170.00 $45,000.00 $113,170.00 Pave-Tech, Inc. $67,250.00 $59,597.00 $126,847.00 Ace Restoration and Waterproofing $48,362.55 $86,466.10 $134,828.65 R.J. Bullard Construction $38,075.00 $97,050.00 $135,125.00 Peterson-Chase General Construction $46,279.00 $99,350.00 $145,629.00 Penhall Company $59,684.50 $113,815.00 $173,499.50 4-Con Engineering, Inc. $72,445.00 $106,850.00 $179,295.00 Penhall Company of Anaheim for joint seal work and California Surface Prep of Santee for deck cleaning were listed as subcontractors, with MD Construction Group's bid, the lowest total bid. No subcontractors were listed with R. J. Bullard Construction's bid, the lowest base bid. Staff is recommending that City Council award the contract to the low responsible bidder, MD Construction Group, in the amount of$113,170.00. COMMISSIONBOARD REVIEW, RECOMMENDATIONS N/A FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS MD Construction Group's bid for construction, including crack sealing, is $113,170.00. $175,000 is budgeted in Account No. 12-65300-4710-117 for FY 1998-1999. The engineer's estimate for construction, including crack sealing, is $152,700. Specialty inspection is anticipated to cost $20,000, general inspection and administration are anticipated to cost $5,000. NOTIFICATION Penhall Company 4-Con Engineering, Inc. ACE Restoration&Waterproofing MD Construction Group Pave-Tech, Inc. Residents within 300 feet of these projects, 10 on Via Tonada and 6 on Imperial Drive have been notified of the Agenda Item. Webb Community Management, Inc. • AGENDA ITEM • July 21, 1998 Page 4 ALTERNATE ACTIONS 1. Award the contract for City Bridge Repairs to the low responsible bidder, MD Construction, in the amount of$113,170.00, and reject all other bids. 2. Do not award the contract. 3. Request additional information from Staff. RECOMMENDATION By motion, award the contract for City Bridge Repairs to the low responsible bidder, MD Construction Group, in the amount of$113,170.00, and reject all other bids. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the documents on behalf of the City. Respectfully Submitted, Pr ared by William M. Huber, P.E. Brian Perry, P.E. Director, Engineering & Building Project Manager WMFT/BP:ssg Attachment: 1. Location Map 2. Contract 7-2lbrge.bp • ii'•3 ''ti� : it? .:: .• ' :?ci : 3i3:................. ....... .. .. .:�i:i:�s :%?%i> i"::; : i:` i .. . .. i?r .:::.:::.::::::..::.: :: �> CITY BRIDGE • REPAIRS ::::::•::::::tr::::4.i : .... � ` >�.:i::.:i:a• ,::::::::. :.:.;:.;;::::. ..:>::>ii:.: ........:.:. :.r ::::.:::::. ::::::::::. :.::.::.:;;:::<:.:::. `lJ • ..........:::.::....:... ......:.. ................................. c f • 0 3r� z'`a• • HIGH) 0 .:... .. ..;; . .............................• N. • A • 1 • 'f•i • ......................... • �S -;.: :-,:::,:,.:..,.:-:...::•:::::-......'...::.::::::.,.:.:i..'.;::.:;:. ,..!;,::::::111,1:::::',::::.!,:,:§:;.:1.1,1.,1.1,13:.!.:.:•:.:::::;:.:'.:::.::.,:.,',.,'..,:,':.:,.,'....1.::.i.::.ii..111".Iiii',.111,.i....ii...i..i..i.i.ii.,',..iii.iiiiii.i..i.i...i.i...i.'.:..,.,..i..i..!...i..'.....1..i...i..:..i..,.1.,1.!,:iiiiiriti:Itiii.A.ri • • "7 • • • 1' • i:i ,......54. A.,. ,,..,..:.: •.... . i] y } .‘::"..........::..i::::.::i...:„:1:11,........::::::.1........:.•...!.., ., .. • • \ , ., ...,......•....... i;%s 050 ......... .::.oik, , v • 9 L I V • iiitiiiri:ii>.+:i:iiiii:Ffi::: I )r '''''.:"':' e ....:::......,::.:,:::::::::::::„.::::::::::::::,_........ ... ..........,....................... ............"•"•-• •" •••"""•••••••••••••••••••••••••••„....— . - a-, VW% r3 ....... E E ::::;t>::;:>>:.:;:o-•;;::a:•:<�::• ,44\1144 ? C1`:::: 'N •;i: ��'i;;i%i3>�i3i?%ii:?;iii::[ [Jiiiii!ii.51:...i::::;::::':!iiii.ii,4? ,.„ 1 @ * ...::„..,........'4tit , .,....:.........'...:....:.....:....::.i..:,...........i.4,taa - !II - ..... I I 1 I 14 ki.3:1 I I I P . .,,t,,, I 4It ji'I 0.... — 4iiiiton.„..i.,,.:: . %il,fir .•;..<<: : A .mix,..jaiip ' .,,..._ -q4% :41(IP 6 Ikk DEL AVION -/p pr '-' `ba • r `l� PROJECT LOCATIONS atiiir • s. ,...a,.....::.,.:. . 7.m. ..,:ii:':',11": 4. a • • • '" S 0 • .:>: »iii>.<: T s 411.1F444& . ................. .....................„.........................................„.......,..„.......... • •"*.• .............„....... / W- tto.scale;: ...'. ca+ulNo las a14124.15 .:.::::::i*::::::::: : ; ATTACHMENT 1 ..::::: .... ONSENT CALENDAR It w. . moved by Council Member Campbell, seconded by Council Member Swerdlin,that the staff recom .endatiors be accepted for the following items listed on the Consent Calendar. The motion carried b the following vote: • YES: Council Members Swerdlin, Greiner, Hart, Campbell and Mayor Jones NOES: None ABSENT: None 1. MOTION TO READ BY ' TLE ONLY The Reading of all Ordinances b s title only was approved. 2. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL M TES OF JUNE 16, 1998 The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of June • 1998, were approved as submitted. 3. RECEIVE AND FILE WARRANTS OF JUNE 30, '98 (300.30) The List of Demands dated June 30, 1998, in the total amou of$664,116.36, was ordered received and filed. 4. RECEIVE AND FILE STATUS REPORT OF NEW DE OPMENT APPLICATIONS (440.10) The Report dated July 21, 1998, from the Planning Director, advising that -ven new applications had been received since the last Report on June 16, 1998,was ordered r- eived and filed. )5. AWARD OF CONTRACT - CITY BRIDGE REPAIRS (MD CONSTRUCTION GROUP) (CIP No. 117) (600.30) As set forth in the Report dated July 21, 1998, from the Director of Engineering and Building, the contract for City Bridge Repairs was awarded to the low responsible bidder, MD Construction Group, in the amount of$113,170.00. The Mayor and City Clerk were authorized to execute the contract on behalf of the City. 6. AUTHORIZATION TO RECEIVE INFORMAL BIDS-DESCANSO VETERANS PARK(CIP No. 465) (600.30) As set forth in the Report dated July 21, 1998, from the Director of Engineering and Building, Staff was authorized to receive informal bids for Descanso Veterans Park City Council Minutes -4- 7/21/98