Loading...
1994-0621_CREATIVE LIGHTING INC_G3b_Agenda ReportAGENDA ITEM June 21, 1994 TO: George Scarborough, City Manager FROM: Tom Tomlinson, Planning Director SUBJECT: Concept Approval of Capital Improvement Project (CIP) 454, Basketball Court Lighting (Acjachema and Camino Capistrano) ZOOM I 8V 1 WIowe, By resolution: approve Capital Improvement Project (CIP) 454, Basketball Court Lighting, Option C (Attachment 1). SITUATION A. Prgject Manager Architect or Eng nt eer Sam Shoucair, Senior Engineer Engineering Division Engineering and Building Department City of San Juan Capistrano (714)443-6335 Ron Reed Reedcorp Engineering, Inc. 2061 Business Center Drive, Suite 110 Irvine, California 92715 The City, as part of the approved capital improvement program, proposes to install outdoor fighting to illuminate the two (2) existing basketball courts situated at the corner of Camino Capistrano and Acjachema (see Attachment 2). The Planning Commission approved a conditional use permit for the lighting at their May 10 meeting. Section 9-3.614(c) of the Land Use Code establishes standards for recreation lighting and states: "(c) Outdoor recreational use. Outdoor night lighting for tennis courts, equestrian uses, and other recreational uses, except that required for security purposes, shall not be permitted unless a Conditional Use Permit is approved by the City. All outdoor night lighting shall be arranged to substantially confine all direct rays to the subject property and away from streets and adjacent properties. For specific standards regarding tennis courts, refer to Section 9- 3.607(e)(4) of this Chapter" (Land Use code, page 436) Staff recommends that the City Council approve Option C of this capital improvement project subject to conditions contained in the draft resolution. FOR CITY COUNCIL AGEN 67,3-b 0 City Council Agenda Item -2- June 21, 1994 C. Backaround 1. General Plan Designation: The project site is designated "5.1, existing public school" site by the General Plan Proposed Land Use Map. The designation allows the development and use of educational and accessory uses including recreation facilities such as athletic fields and multi-purpose courts. 2. Zoning Designation: The property is zoned "IP" (public and institutional) which allows "public and private recreational facilities" as permitted accessory uses and structures with outdoor lighting subject to a conditional use permit (refer to Section 9-3.418(c)). The property is also zoned "D" (design standards) overlay district which regulates primarily architectural design and site planning, but establishes no lighting standards. 3. Environmental Processing: On April 12, 1994, the Board issued a mitigated negative declaration for the proposed lighting including six (6), thirty-five (35) foot tall pole masts, metal halide lights, with "shoebox" style fixture. A copy of the initial study and negative declaration are provided as Attachment 3. 4. Community Redevelopment Agency: While the project site is situated within the CRA area of the City, it neither affects nor would be affected by the CRA designation. 5. Prior Entitlement: The property has not been subject to any previous land use entitlement. The existing courts were installed as part of the former San Juan Capistrano High School D. Project Description The project consists of a proposal to install outdoor lighting to illuminate two existing public basketball courts situated at the comer of the Camino Capistrano and Acjachema. The basketball courts are bordered to the north and south by tennis courts and directly adjoin Camino Capistrano. The project includes consideration of three alternatives. Each propose to install maximum thirty (30) foot height, 1000 watt metal halide lights, and "shoebox" style fight fixtures. However, Options A and B involve eight poles with ten fixtures while Option C involves six poles with eight fixtures. General specifications for the lighting are provided as Attachment 4. E. Issues The issues raised by this project include the appropriateness of outdoor lighting, the acceptability of the aesthetic design, and the adequacy of the lighting for the basketball use. 0 • City Council Agenda Item -3- June 21, 1994 F. Staff Analysis Is the aesthetic design of the proposed lighting project consistent with the General Plan's design policies and is lighting appropriate for recreational sport? The General Plan Community Design Element promotes land use compatibility between various types of land uses through a combination of area designations and land use policy. Perhaps the most important area, the "Mission District", includes the subject site. The proposed lighting is an accessory improvement which, depending on its design, could be incompatible with existing land uses. The "Mission District" establishes a maximum two story limit on structures in the downtown area so that Mission San Juan Capistrano retains its visual dominance of the skyline and is not 'overshadowed" by new development. Height restrictions have played an important role in maintaining the visual quality of the historic downtown. Consequently, lighting should be restricted to a maximum height no greater than two stories, or no more than thirty-five feet. The proposed 24 foot mast height would be consistent with the General Plan height limitations for the Mission District. As part of the Parks and Recreation Element update in 1989, the City conducted a needs assessment to determine requirements for additional facilities. While the needs assessment found that the current availability of basketball courts was adequate, the Element stated that community parks should include the following elements: o active recreational facilities, including lit and unlit softball and baseball diamonds, soccer/football fields, basketball courts, volleyball courts, and tennis courts; (Parks and Recreation Element, page 94.11) Therefore, lighted basketball courts are appropriate and consistent with the General Plan. Regarding fixture design, the proposed "shoebox" style fixture represents an aesthetic, visually -appealing fixture. The design is simple, unobtrusive and a commonly used outdoor light fixture in the City. City staff initially considered, but discounted, a floodlight -type fixture which was more efficient but much less aesthetically compatible (see Attachment 5). Given the location of the basketball courts in the "design overlay district" and their close proximity to the New Nfission Church and public library, the more aesthetic "shoebox" fixture design is warranted. Therefore, the proposal to light existing courts with a "shoebox" style fixture is consistent with the policies of the Community Design Element and the Parks and Recreation Element. Staff recommends City Council find the proposed project would be consistent with the General Plan subject to a height restriction of twenty-four (24) feet and the use of "shoebox" style fixture. 0 L] Council A¢enda Item -4- June 21. 1994 Will the proposed lighting design provide adequate illumination for the basketball courts. consistent with the provisions of Title 9_ Land Use Code? Significant lighting issues usually include illumination intensity (brightness) and specific lighting design (ie. light type, maximum/minimum ratio, average intensity). More general issues are discussed in the previous section. The Land Use Code does not establish specific measurable standards for either, but does provide that direct lighting must be confined to the site. Because the Code does not establish light intensity standards for outdoor recreation lighting, staff conducted research to identify appropriate guidelines. Staff surveyed several local cities, park districts, and the County. We found that most jurisdictions have not adopted specific guidelines and in many cases, rely on recommended standards of the Engineering Illumination Society (EIS), a professional organization of lighting design engineers. The following table displays the results of the survey: Lighting Design Guidelines Survey Jurisdiction Average Intensity (fc) Maximum Intensity (fc) Minimum Intensity (fc) Maximum/ Minimum Ratio Anaheim (1) 20 30 10 3:1 Dana Point none Laguna Niguel none. Irvine 30 n/a n/a n/a Orange Co. (1) 20 30 10 3:1 Santa Ana (1) 20 n/a n/a 3:1 Tustin none. (1) Represents the Engineering Illumination Society (EIS) Standard or comparable. Furthermore, Santa Ana provided two project references for lighted basketball courts in operation. Morrison Park located at the comer of Memory Lane and Westwood Street and Sandpoint Park located at the comer of Birch Avenue are illuminated with an average 20 footcandles. Ron Ono, Parks and Recreation Chief stated that the average 20 footcandles provided adequate and appropriate illumination levels for those outdoor basketball courts. The EIS establishes illumination design guidelines based on the type of activity as well as the level of play. The EIS guidelines for basketball courts are as follows: 0 • City Council Agenda Item -5- June 21, 1994 EIS Lighting Guidelines for Basketball Type Average Intensity (fc) Maximum Intensity (fc) Minimum Intensity (fc) Recommended Max./Min. Ratio Recreation n/a n/a 10 3:1 High School n/a n/a 30 3:1 College n/a n/a 1 50 1 3:1 Source: Westinghouse Lighting Handbook, Floodlighting Design, Sports Lighting. With respect to illumination intensity, Reedcorp, the City's consultant, has provided photometric analysis for the three lighting options (see Attachment 6). A summary of that photometric analysis is provided in the table below: Photometric Analysis of Proposed Basketball Court Lighting Factor Option A Option B Option C Maximum (fc) 36.68 46.91 35.76 Minimum (fc) 19.77 22.91 19.12 Average (fc) 29.61 31.57 23.81 Mast height (ft) 30 24 24 Maximum/Minimum Ratio (uniformity) 1:86:1 2.04:1 1.87:1 Spillover @ right-of-way <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 No. of Light poles 8 8 6 No. of light fixtures 10 1 10 8 Source: Photometric Analysis, Reedcorp, April/May 1994. All three options would exceed the EIS guidelines for outdoor basketball court lighting. The average lighting level of Options A and B would exceed the maximum by about 7 and 17 fc respectively. Option C would exceed the EIS guideline by about 6 fc. All three of the options would exceed the minimum light intensity guideline by at least 10 fc. While minimum light intensity of the three options would exceed the EIS guideline necessary to serve recreation level basketball (minimum 10 fc), it would not be sufficient for high school level basketball (minimum 30 fc). City Council Agenda Item -6- June 21, 1994 Options A and C would each have maximum intensity lighting about 10 fc less bright than than Option B (about 36 fc versus 46 fc). The lower intensity results from Option A lights being mounted at 30 feet as opposed to 24 feet and Option C having fewer light fixtures (8 versus 10). The lighting uniformity of each option would be well within the 3:1 accepted standard, with Options A and C providing better uniformity than Option B. Options A and B would average about 30 fc light intensity, consistent with the City of Irvine standard, but about 10 fc brighter than the 20 fc average permitted by other cities. Option C would provide an average 24 fc, slightly exceeding the EIS standard. In terms of light pole height, Options B and C would use a 24 foot standard height as opposed to Option A at 30 feet. Option C would use fewer light poles and fixtures resulting in relatively lower capital cost. Staff supports Option C based on the following factors: o Provides adequate lighting for basketball court use based on EIS guidelines while minimizing light intensity. o Minimizes light and glare as well as aesthetic impacts through the use of a relatively shorter light pole (24 versus 30 feet). o Has a relatively lower capital cost (fewer poles and fixtures). Consequently, staff recommends that the City Council approve Option C, subject to the lighting factors outlined in the Photometric Analysis including maximum 35.76 footcandles, minimum 19.12 footcandles, average 23.81 footcandles, and maximum spillover of less than 2 footcandles. COMMISSION/Bi2ARD REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Commission considered this project at their May 10 public hearing. The Commission expressed concern that Options A or B would result in light impacts to the surrounding area. The Commission recommended that lighting be reduced to the minimum level adequate to accommodate the proposed use, subject to determination by the Planning Director. In response, staff had the City's lighting consultant, Reedcorp, prepare Option C. FINANCIAL CONSIDERATION The Capital Improvement Program has budgeted $20,000 for the project. Reedcorp estimates construction costs alone to be $23,000. Engineering design and preparation of final plans and specifications will cost about $3,800. Project administration and construction inspection will cost an additional $3,000. Therefore, the total project cost is estimated to be about $29,800. Engineering staff is presently preparing a detailed cost estimate based on the preliminary design and will request an adjustment to the approved CIP funding as part of the FYI 995-2001 CEP process. 0 -7- r-1 L-A PUBLIC NOTIFICATION ©� (� I" L �J A Notice of Public Meg r this item was advertised in the Capistrano Valley News and posted in in accordance with adoptedity Council policy. A copy is provided as Attachment 7. ALTERNATE ACTIONS Approve Capital Improvement Project (CIP) 454, Basketball Court Lighting, Option C (Attachment 1). 2. Not approve Capital Improvement Project (CIP) 454, Basketball Court Lighting, Option C. 3. Continue the public }tesaZDJuly 5, 1994 and direct staff provide additional information on specific issues. RECOMMENDATION By resolution: approve Capital Improvement Project (CIP) 454, Basketball Court Lighting, Option C (Attachment 1). Respectfully submitted, Tom Tomlinson, Planning Director WR:hs Attachments 1. Resolution approving Capital Improvement Project (CIP) 454 2. Project Location Map. 3. Mitigated Negative Declaration. 4. Lighting Specifications, "Shoebox" style fixture. 5. Floodlight -style fixture. 6. Photometric Analysis, Options A, B, and C. 7. Public Meeting Notice. (cAwpwin60bipbip454bc.cca) VGC 7��_ 0 0 RESOLUTION NO. 94-6-21-7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONCEPTUAL PLANS FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 454, THE INSTALLATION OF OUTDOOR LIGHTING (OPTION C) AT TWO EXISTING BASKETBALL COURTS LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF CAMINO CAPISTRANO AND ACJACHEMA WHEREAS, the City owns and maintains public recreation facilities at the Old Capistrano High School site located at the comer of Camino Capistrano and Acjachema, including two basketball courts; and, WHEREAS, the City's adopted Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Yew 1994 through Fiscal Year 2000 has allocated funding for the installation of outdoor lighting to provide extended evening use of those basketball courts for residents of the adjoining neighborhoods and the City; and, WHEREAS, staff has reviewed the project for consistency with the policies, objectives and design guidelines of the General Plan's Community Design Element and the Parks and Recreation Element and the applicable outdoor lighting provisions of Title 9, Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Board has reviewed the project pursuant to Section 15070 of the California Environmental Quality Act and issued a mitigated negative declaration and caused the same to be posted pursuant to the City's Environmental Review Guidelines, and has otherwise complied with all applicable provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act; and, WHEREAS, those mitigation measures established pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, Section 15070(b)(1) as part of the environmental review process have been incorporated herein as conditions of approval; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a duly -noticed public meeting on May 10, 1994. pursuant to Section 9-3.200 of the Municipal Code, and approved a mitigated negative declaration and conditional use permit for the subject project. NOW,THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of San Juan Capistrano does hereby make the following findings: I. The proposed project is consistent with the policies and objectives of the San Juan Capistrano General Plan, in particular the Open Space and Conservation Element; and, 2. The proposed project complies with all applicable provisions of Tide 9, Land Use Code of the Municipal Code, subject to mitigation measures and conditions contained in this resolution. BE ff FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of San Juan Capistrano does hereby approve the conceptual plans for Capital Improvement Project 454, Basketball Court Lighting, Option C. subject to the following conditions: 1. The final construction plans will be designed to substantially comply with the proposed lighting layout and design for Option C prepared by Reedcorp, dated May, 1994. All lighting shall be for the two existing basketball courts only located at the comer of Camino Capistrano and Acjachema only. 2. Light shielding fixtures will be a "shoe box" style or comparable fixture consistent with the design character of the historic downtown area. • 3. All outdoor lighting shall be a metal halide or high-pressure sodium light source and shall be shielded so that direct lightittg is confined to the limits of the existing courts. Spill over light will not exceed the existing maximum ambient light levels within the Camino Capistrano and Acjachema public tights -of -way, or 2 foot-candles. whichever is greater. All lighting shall be extinguished no later than 10:00 p.m. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 21st day of June 1994. OLLENE BELL,MAYOR ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO ) I, CHERYL JOHNSON, City Clerk of the City of San Juan Capistrano, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. 94-6-21-7 adopted by the City Council of the City of San Juan Capistrano, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 21st day of June , 1994, by the following vote: AYES: Council Members Jones, Hausdorfer, Nash, Vasquez and Mayor Campbell NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None L . �_ r"�. i.1� n a t -2. Y a m J '19 vw3HOvrov z H ATTACHMENT 2 z I z I o ani otu a 3 O - M V1 ci zax� ; O z H ATTACHMENT 2 z I z I o ani ^•d - f zax� ; J i �--_-- ■I a V! ■ m °C o o ' ��■ (A V •YTI i ~ I- Q W O Ql = Ji z H ATTACHMENT 2 I a 0 City of San Juan Capistrano Date Posted: 32400 Paseo Adelanto San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Posting Removal: (714) 493-1171 (min. 20 days or 30 days if subject to SCH review) NEGATIVE DECLARATION 1. PROPONENT: City of San Juan Capistrano 2. ADDRESS: 32400 Paseo Adelanto, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 3. PHONE: (714) 443-6334 4. LEAD AGENCY: City of San Juan Capistrano 5. PROJECT TITLE: CIP 454, Basketball Court Lighting (Acjachema and Camino Capistrano). 6. DESCRIPTION: The City proposes to install six light standards with a maximum thirty foot height, 400 watt metal halide light source, and "shoebox" style light fixture on two existing basketball courts located at the corner of Acjachema and Camino Capistrano. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW BOARD (ERB) DETERMINATION: This project has been evaluated by the Environmental Review Board of the City of San Juan Capistrano in accordance with the adopted California State guidelines to determine its potential impact on the environment. On April 12, the Environmental Review Board determined that this project will not have a significant effect on the environment because mitigation measures will reduce potential impacts to a level of insignificance. Therefore, the Environmental Review Board has issued a Mitigated Negative Declaration. The basis for the Board's determination is the Initial Study completed for the subject project. The Initial Study is attached and copies may be obtained from the Planning Department, City Hall, 32400 Paseo Adelanto, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 William Ramsey, AICP, Environmep al oordinator *:rssss.•.ssr**�*::**sr*s:s■*sr*ar**«**x**r****►�:..****�x*:*x:**�**■*srrss*:* Any person may file an appeal to a Negative Declaration. Appeals must be filed in writing with the Planning Department within thirty (30) days of the "date posted". The filing of an appeal stays the Board issuance of a negative declaration until a determination on appeal by the City Council. If the City determines that the appeal is based on environmental factors not previously considered which may have a significant effect on the environment, the City may require preparation of an environmental impact report (EIR). The City Council has delegated authority for issuing Negative Declarations to the ERB by Resolution 74-2-11-2 and the City's adopted Environmental Impact Report Guidelines. cc: County Clerk project file lobby posting site posting CEQA file (cA"win60\cip\cip454bc.nd) ATTACHMENT 3 Listed for P, k Wel Locations SRL Series Signature Roadway "1'0 Ldminaire 400 watts,and 1000 watts High Pressure Sodium Metal Halide PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS ❑ APPLICATIONS Forward throw i islnb.ito win -,ail house side cutoff Typical apprratons raus auto dealerships, tennis coups. pernneler hgnling and driveways ❑ CONSTRUCTION The housing is labdcaled Irom formed aluminum that is seam. welded lar sIr',uth and durability. It is 1,, 1, d with i� r,p lx IP" bronze polyester powdm that is ghy resistant to chalking and delenoral.on Thr len, c, impact resistant tempered glass arid scaled in a door frame that swncs Inward the pule and out of the way when open All ballast components are monnlpC nn a n'rb,n, ballast tray that securely locks int r plsj . e with a single screw. An internal reinter o,lg plate assures rigid ahachmenl 1(viemounh g arm and prevents fixture sag Lamp snckels are nickel plated "lamp gnp 4 p wit a Siring loaded center Contact Metal hallus, 5of-kel5 are Position Oriented Mogul lype� lur use with standard or high performance lamps. High pressure sodium sockets are 6 KV puts rated for 1,000 watt and 4 KV sled for 400 all V OCT Rig 19c z crr, CF 9AN `o4v "i IS.5: rr CA.IFpgGIA � 42 - ❑ OPTICS The SRL has I.E.S. Type IV, forward throw distribution that meets IES. cutoff criteria and has sharp cutoff behind the pole. Its reflector assembly is rotatable so that the pattern can be pointed ahead or to either side of the fixture. 1,000 watt luminaires have an insulated retainer that supports the glass end of the lamp to assure proper photometric alignment between the lamp and reflector. The reflector is fabricated from anodized aluminum, high reflectance fighting sheet for maximum efficiency and durability. Refer to Section 12 for photometric data. ❑ BALLAST Ballasts are high power tactor aulotranstormer type (CWA). Winding insulation is Class H (180'C) and capable of operating tamps at INFORMATION -20°F for metal halide and -40°F for high pressure sodium. All ballast components are 100% tested to assure reliability and maximum performance. Refer to Section 12 for electrical data. ❑ INSTALLATION The SRL is equipped with an extruded aluminum arm capable of being directly mounted to a 4", or larger, square pole. ❑ LAMPS The SRL is capable of accepting any mogul screw base high pressure sodium or metal halide lamp of the prescribed wattage. Lamps can be shipped with the fixture as a factory option. Refer to Section 12 for lamp data. Catalog No. Watts Lamp Base Ballast Arm Length HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM RL404LX 400 E18„ Mogul CWA 7" HALIDE VOLTAGE—Specify voltage: 120V, 208V, 24OV, 277V, or 460V, For mulli-tap I12(YV, 208V, 240V and 277V) Order "MTS". OPTIONS To order the following factory installed options. add appropriate suffix to Cat. No. Suffix 11" MOUNTING ARM: Used when two or more fixtures are mounted on a pole at 900 angles ................ 11 PHOTOCELL RECEPTACLE....... _PC FUSING For 120V and 277V Single fusing ...... FS For 208V, 240V and 480V Double Fusing ...................... FFS FACTORY PRELAMPED .............L 1# ACCESSSORIES The following are field installed accessories. Order by Cat. No. Cal No. ROUND POLE ADAPTER ............ RPA WALL ADAPTER PLATE ............. SW ATTACHMENT 4 ■Stock "em. Normally carried in factory stock and/of at local regional warehouses Ir Bieber Lighting, a leader in the outdoor illumination field for over forty years and in tennis lighting for over twenty, presents the Parkette series, NET SET for tennis court lighting. These Net Set ecology lights will provide the comfort of daylight play at night. Net Set's high level of illumination is achieved while minimizing glare due to its unique optical chamber design. Net Set is designed for easy installation and maintenance. TYPICAL COURT LAYOUTS Side -by -Side Tennis Court Layout Poke 48-� Recommended height for 8 light system -22' For blight system -24' Courts may be lighted at lower heights where restricted y." pipe —piing, Minimum pole size electric reed 3'h" O.D. Tabove grade. structural steel. _ I-- -60,- ConcrNe looting 6 Fixture 6 Fixture Hotel Paddle Court Layout Tournament Play Layout or Home Play Layout BIEBER1 cGeawngs novo sceiel LIGHTING CORPORATION 'FIX rw Mini Net Set Accessory light for walkways and parking areas. Standard Net Set (Drawings not to scale) SPECIFICATIONS Housing—All aluminum, heavy duty, continuous welded. waterproof, UL listed 'for wet locations." Cannot rust. A heavy aluminum plate Is welded inside fixture at the mounting arm joint for extra strength to withstand heavy winds.' Aluminum partitions are installed between trans- former. bulb and arm for cooler operation of these com- ponents. This construction is stronger than die-cast aluminum. Optical Chamber—Specially designed for tennis lighting. Consists of a 3 -piece scoop -type reflector, die -formed from a marriage of diamond -embossed aluminum and smooth coilzak. This synergistic design is a much more effective method of diffusing light evenly, while minimizing glare, than any to date. They produce a square pattern of light. Curved and rectangular arms available in all sizes POLESs, T c=11 22' 'Pole Haight 1 ❑— ' 7D --T ° T 11.. 516" 11.. 5.6.. L 1 L 1 bolt down direct burial bolt down direct burial a" -round pole 0" -square pole Electrical Components—All components are of the highest quality obtainable and UL listed. "quick service power door" available upon request. All ballasts are CWA high power factor regulating auto -transformers, starting at -20°F. They are available in metal halide, mercury vapor and high pressure sodium vapor. All wattages and volt- ages are available. Fixture Mounting Arm—A one-piece rectangular steel tube for strength with slipfitter welded to it to fit any pole size. Galvanized Vz" setbolts hold it in place. Cap is furn- ished with it to keep out moisture. Socket—Is glazed porcelain with silver coated 600 V contacts. mogul base, spring loaded. Finish—is etched, primed and baked using acrylic Lens and Frame Assembly—Lens consists of a '4" enamel. Standard colors are bronze, black, silver white, tempered, high impact heat -resistant glass. The frame green and brown Custom colors to your specs, no extra and lens are moisture sealed by 2 closed cell neoprene charge Duronodic anoeaing available on special request_ gaskets. The lens frame Is one-piece die formed 16 gauge aluminum. It Is secured by 2 quarter tum captive screws for easy maintenance. The lens frame opens on a full- length heavy duty aluminum piano hinge. All fixtures are factory -tested before shipment. Pole height may vary according to number p! Iighis per coin and local ordinances See recommendaiors on page 2 'Sanaa-tl um¢ apo'oveC r1, un m 125 my ,:. 3 "arng a1,^a o,. 'r;leII Li ht-Struc�re S stem` 40 J Y Standard Configurations 2 -Light 3 -Light 4 -Light 5 -Light 6 -Light 7 -Light Structure Structure Structure Structure Structure (; Structure � tl 0 6¢ 9,6" �W_ 10 -Light 6 Structure 119" 11 -Light Structure lig 0 11'9" 12 -Light Structure 2' S 24 14' "ki 13-Light Structure ' 14' S L 21 -Light Structure 22- Str Structureight 15 -Light cture t I • %>41 �Y 23 -Light Iµ'� $tNC1UlB u Additional fixtures can be added in Stacked 3 -light configurations bolt -on configurations. up to 15 units are available to allow servicing from the pole. ATTACHMENT 5 I r orn"4 %% A N NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, ANALYSIS IIF ENTIRE AREA . AVERAGE- 29.61 MAX.+ 36.60 MIN.- 19,77 AVERAGE/MIN116JN- 1.3011 MAXIMUM/lIINlMUM• 1.061t LUMINAIRE LOCAIIIIN PARAMETERS COORDINA[ES IN tEET -x_11,'9-�SIIt� :"TrTtsr�v—T '-DELTA LIGHTING SYSTA'YS, INC. L': ENaiNEERIN0 DESIGN DEPT. BASKETBALL COURTS TRIC uv _ _ REEDCORP. kTr44 AA9Rr iA'. INT.Alf -- - It C 94-CISA- If/d A 3 94 --- .., ' SCALE AIRING LUMINAIRE MOUNTING CMDINATES NO. TYPE .... ----- X COORD -------- Y-CWRD HEIGHT ------ ORIENT TILT X T QUANT 1 1 36 ------- 3 30 ------- 90 ------- 10 •--"-- ------ 36 to ----- 1 2 1 70 S 30 90 10 71 10 1 11 3 1 79 144 30 970 t0 79 139 1 4 1 36 144 30 970 IO� 339 1 I1 0 1 10 74 30 310 10 11 70 1 6 1 l0 74 30 43 10 11 74 1 7 1 104 74 30 139 to 100 79 1 9 1 104 74 30 m 10 too 70 1 9 I e7 t44 30 970 to 57 139 1 t0 1 57 S 30 90 10 97 t0 I L1IMINAIRE TYPE I UNIQUE LOCATIONS 10 TNUMBERtF NTITY: AVG. TILTED LAMP CORRECTION FACTOR APPLIED I -x_11,'9-�SIIt� :"TrTtsr�v—T '-DELTA LIGHTING SYSTA'YS, INC. L': ENaiNEERIN0 DESIGN DEPT. BASKETBALL COURTS TRIC uv _ _ REEDCORP. kTr44 AA9Rr iA'. INT.Alf -- - It C 94-CISA- If/d A 3 94 --- .., ' SCALE .. .. _ ilJ .0JJ . _ � J .r•CL �n I T . S Cl r_. 114 IOli.p .. .. H1- M•COii"d F'.IJ� _ i • ©�\Il� NII ILLUMINANCE VALUES ------------------ VIEWING DIRECTION (toE-of-prim/ovU IS NORTH HORIZONTAL PLANE OF POINTS LIGHT MET[R IS PARALLEL 10 PLANE SCALE LEFT TO RIGHT 10 FEET PER INCH ALILVATOP TONBOTTUMANEDESFEET PER INCH BASE OF PLANE LOCATED AT Yr 0 WORKPLAN[ HEIGHT - Z- 0 • 4 1 9 � 3 71 % §.7 t5.4 SDa ,o 3,14.T 33.0 tB.a ge iall-- �2.3 X8,1 3314 3S-6 36.6 34.2 330.9 11 110 - 2.9 A6.5 y9,2 302 30.9 9 4 h.4 A 7,5 �9.l 129.3 �97 b.4 99,7 99.5 10 9' 1.9 315 ke X8.9 98.5 99.0 30.1 3e 80-- 5 TI 7 T1 70-1 6 Tl 8 TI 60--I el 32.5 219.5 h3 10.9 99.e 31.0 33 50-- 8.6 h.9 6.5 500 '9.6 $0,0 599.1 99. 116.9 4n 3.3 9.3 30.5 3L0 69 g8.6 111 2.6 98.3 153.4 35.5 36.6 34.3 30.9 24 h.9 32.6 35D 36.0 33.8 98.9 €E 1 T1 10 1 2 T1 J-- 0 eo 40 60 80 100 1B0 LUMINAIRE DESCRIPTION LUMINAIRE TYPE 1 1 FILENAME . L118350k.1E2 EZC 1000 Mll FT L1183BA.IES LAW-#J000 CLEAR MI ICADI RDE TEST LAMP LUMENS 1 110000 INITIAL' LAMP LUMENS 1 110000 LIGHT LOSS FACTOR 1 .B BASED ON LAMP LUNEN DEPRECIAt ION x LUMINAIRE DIRT DEPRECIATION 1w 0 NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, ------------------ ANALYSIS _______________ANALYSIS 13F ENTIRE AREA AVERAGE- 31.57 MAX,- 46.91 AVERAGE/MINIMUM= 1.37 1 MAXIMUM/MINIMUM- 2.04,4 LJMINAIRE LOCATION PARAMETERS COORDINATES IN FEET MIN. 9 120 1 DELTA LIGHTING SYSTEMS, -� '- INC. v L� ENGINEERING DESIGN DEPT. TTTi.'f7 - BASKETBALL COURTS MOT D. ET LAF�IT�YDki -•-- REEDCORP, JA Ile-r-'rr- ATE, C i X34 -018D NIC 4-94 SMFFT. t t' 1 AIMING LUMINA IRE MOUNT INF, COORDINATES NO TYPE X-COGRD Y-000RD HEIGHT ORIENT TILT X Y QUANT ___ ____ 1 1 _ ____ 36 _______ _______ S 24 _______ 90 ------- IO ----- — 36 9 1 2 1 70 S 24 90 10 79 9 1 3 1 79 144 24 870 10 70 140 1 4 1 36 144 24 870 to 36 140 1 7 T1 5 1 to 74 24 315 to 13 71 1 6 T1 11 1 104 74 E4 135 10 101 77 1 0 1 104 74 24 em 10 lot 71 1 9 1 57 S 24 90 10 57 9 1 10 1 57 l44 24 270 10 57 140 1 I IIMINAIRE TYPE 1 NUMBER OF UNIQUE LOCATIONS • IO TOTAL QUANTITY - 10 AVG. TILTED LAMP CORRECTION FACTOR APPLIED • I 120 1 DELTA LIGHTING SYSTEMS, -� '- INC. v L� ENGINEERING DESIGN DEPT. TTTi.'f7 - BASKETBALL COURTS MOT D. ET LAF�IT�YDki -•-- REEDCORP, JA Ile-r-'rr- ATE, C i X34 -018D NIC 4-94 SMFFT. t t' 1 190-- 140-- 130-- 120 - 110- 100 - so -- 70- 60 1. 10-- 100-- ILLUHINANCE VALUES ----------------- VIEWING DIRECTION (top-of-printoui> IS NORTH HURIZONTAL PLANE OF POINTS LlGlli MEtER IS PARALLEL TO PLANE SCALE LEF1 f0 RIGHT 20 FEET PER INCH SCALE TDP TO ICTTOM e0 FEET AER INCH ALL VALUES 14 FOOTCANDLES DARE OF PLANE LOCATED At Y• 0 WORKPLANE HEIGHT , Z• 0 4 Ti 10 Tit 3 T1 e.9 3e.e 11.7 15.9 US 13.e $6.2 Al A3.6 19.7 3s.3 31.9 39.3 35.9 3e.e 1s 13.3 19.9 0.6 3e.5 32.1 31, 30.0 96 30,9 AS.7 99.4 37.7 17.5 19.3 194 97 612 30.5 19_e^16.5 16.3 17.3 19.7 34 3 TI 7 T1 6 T1 6 T1 9.6 31.9 99-7 96,9 16.9 17.7 6.1 }6. 9.1 19.3 99.9 39.0 17.7 19.7 19.4 le. 4.0 39.5 6.0 32.3 31.9 31. '30.3 16. 3.9 19.5 3,.9 37,4 $9.9 3s.4 32.2 11. 3.i 34.00112.5 16.9 16.6 US 3e.e Az 1 1 Y1- 9 ?1 2 Ti I .- ---T._ --r-- D 20 40 60 b 100 1e0 LUMINAIRE btSCRIPTtON 3� LUMINAIRE TYPE 1 i FILENAME = 1.I1935A.1ES EZC 1000 MH FT L11935A.IES LAMP -11000 CLEAR MH tCADI RDe TEST LAMP LUMENS � 110000 INITIAL LAMP LUMENS 110000 LIGHT LOSS FACTOR - e DASFD ON LAMP LUMEN DEPRECIATION x LUMINAIRE DIRT DEPRECIAT113N LL cc _T i_. 13Qa 11:08 :ELTQ LTG. = STEMS. :h_. HEIGHT 19E° 33 06602292 P.01 NUMERTCAL.A`OSIS, ------- 9 VC 4 � Q PG P1 • ANALYSIS OF ENI'1RC ARCA AVERAGE- 23,01 MAX.- 35,76 MIN.a 19,1E AVERAGE/MINIMUM= 1.2511 MAXIMUM/MINIMUM- 1.97,1 IUMINAIRF LCCA*InN PARAMETERS ..------------- ------ COORDINAIES IN FEET LUMINAIRE MOUNTING NO. ....- TYPE X-COORD ------- Y-000RD HEIGHT 1 ---- 1 36 ------- 9 ------- 24 2 1 78 3 e4 7 T1 3 1 79 144 24 TI 4 1 36 144 24 5 1 10 74 e4 6 1 10 74 e4 7 1 104 74 e4 a 1 104 74 24 I >20 ORIENT TILT 90 to 870 9 79 10 P70 1 315 t0 40 10 133 to 223 10 AIMING COORDINATES x Y 36 70 9 79 140 36 140 13 71 13 77 3 01 71 LUMINAIRF TYPE 1 - NUMBER OF UNIQUE LOCATIONS a 0 TOTAL QUANTITY . 6 AVO, TILTED LAMP CORRECTION FACTOR APPLIED l ,, DELTA LIGHTING SYSTEMS, INC. Lam. ENGINEERING DESIGN DEPT. BASKETBALL CUURTS REEDCORF. "b.. C 94--018$ NIC 150 ►40-- :30-- 120-- 110-- 100-- , p0 B0. ' 7fA-- Goo--� 9Q• - ea. - 10^ t ,l6w NV0 &LUMINANCE VALUES VIEYING DIRECTIIBI"(%-of-prlrtWut) IS NORTH HOR17WAL PLANE OF POINTS LIGHT METER IS PARALLEL TO PLANE SCALL LEFT III RIGHT 20 FEET PER INCH SCALF. T[lP '10 BOTTOM 20 FEET PER INCH ALI. VALUES IN FOOTCANDLES BASE GF PI AW LOCATED AT Ym 0 HORKPLANF.MIGHT 1 7- 0 4 Tl � 3 x -(W 9.9 h.7 $7b 64.9 b2.6 &4 17•B P 7 Tl i t9b h,e h3 b.5 �4,4 h3 X2.9 I to 9,1 i11.► 23 X2.0 13 i67 .d A-3.7 f23 &9 AOA 91.9 13.4 ; 3 26.8 `&I &a I1. AM 14A I 5 T1 6 T1 .7 &1 14A &7 &-i 1&7 �s.e 4.4 A4.3 h.1 113 111 k7 142 9.7 &.1 hJ X3.0 �7.6 hA &0 14.4 &A lild T 1 T1 1 T1 N 2 T1 o zB 4'7 0 -T60 too LUMINAIRE OFSf.'RIPTION LUMINiAJRK TYPE 1 1 FILETMIE ■ LII&W,TES C� NUMERICAL ANALYS ANALYSIS IF ENTT AVERAGEt 29.91 AVERABE/M1N1M & MAxtwm/NINlmtw LUMINAIRE LIICATH Ci97RDINATES IN FI LUMINAIRE NO, TYK x -(W 36 is 7 Tl i T1 79 4 8 to 6 to iw e � E2C 1000 NH FT Li IOWA. IES LAMP --11000 CLEAR MH ICADI RD@ TEST LAMP I.u1ENS 1 110000 INITInL LAMP LUMENS 1 110000 LIGHT ►ASS TAcIUR B BASED UN LAND LUMFN DEPRECIATION x LUNINAIRC GIRT DEPRECIATION Fod V00 9NId33N10N3 JaC13033a L9dlESLVlLI LUMINAIRE TYPE LDELF, El BAs, 10 REE A -4-94 Btr:dl E[ -SO -4661 0 0 NOTICE OF A PUBLIC MEETING Subject Capital Improvement Project (CIP) 454 Basketball Court Lighting (Machema and Camino Capistrano). Dear Resident/Property Owner: On June 21, 1994 at 7:00 pm, the City Council will conduct a public meeting to consider approval of a capital improvement project to install outdoor lighting at the two existing basketball courts located at the corner of Camino Capistrano and Acjachema. In order to provide extended evening use, the City proposes to install six or eight light standards with a maximum thirty foot height, 1000 watt metal halide fight source, and "shoebox" style light fixture. The project site is zoned "IP" (public and institutional) and designated "5.1, existing public school" by the General Plan. Although this proposal does not require a formal public hearing or notice, the City of San Juan Capistrano invites you to attend the meeting to learn how the project may affect you. In addition, the public meeting will provide an opportunity for you to voice your opinion on the project. At the time the item is considered by the Council, public comments will be invited before action is taken on the matter. The meeting will be held in the City Council Chambers located at 32400 Paso Adelanto. If you should be unable to attend the meeting and desire to have your comments considered by the Council, you may submit them in writing to the Planning Department located at the above address. All written comments received prior to the meeting will be distributed to Council members and become part of the public record. If you should have any questions regarding this project prior to the meeting, please contact Bill Ramsey at (714) 443-6334. Sincerely, Dick Bobertz, Planning Manager (c Awpwin60bipbip454bc.pm2)