1993-0512_CALIF, STATE OF_Transmittal to Caltrans r A MEMBERS OF'HE CITY COUNCIL
YV 9q ) COLLENE CAMPBELL
GARY L.HAUSCORFER
p��( GIL PONES
'intln1..10 CAROLVN NASH
a unlnurI N61 JEFF VASQUEZ
1776
• • CITY MANAGER
GEORGE SCARBOROUGH
May 12, 1993
Mr. Larry Layne
Public Transportation
Caltrans, District 12
2501 Pullman Street
Santa Ana, CA 92705
Re: Quarterly Report
Dear Larry:
Enclosed please find the first quarterly report for the Multi-Modal Parking Deck
I believe everything is in order and per agreement. If you have any questions,
please contact me at 493-1171, extension 333.
Respectfully submitted
Douglas D. Dumhart
Management Assistant I
nmb
32400 PASEO ADELANTO. SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA 92675 0 (714) 493-1171
QUARTERLY REPORT
FOR
SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO
MULTI-MODAL PARKING DECK
1ST QUARTER
1 . Task
A. On December 1 , 1992, the City Council approved Concept of the
Multi-Modal Parking Deck subject to computer simulated view
analyses. The view analyses/simulations were brought back for City
Council consideration on March 2, 1993, and was unanimously
approved to begin the design process. The Caltrans contract was
executed and forwarded thereafter. Request For Proposal for
Engineering design services were mailed out on April 26, 1993, and
responses are due back by May 28, 1993.
B. The Design RFP process is 100% complete and response period
is one month ahead of the project schedule as identified in Exhibit "D"
of the Caltrans contracts.
C. It is anticipated that the completion of the review of the
proposals and award of design contract will be 100% on schedule
according to Exhibit "D" in the Caltrans contract.
D. Three simulated view elevations have been completed in a
before and after format. Three 30"x 40$ posterboard photos and nine
slides were generated to help the City Council, downtown merchants
and the community to visualize what has been proposed.
Additionally, a proposed scope of work for the design of the parking
deck has been produced as part of the Request For Proposal for
consulting services.
E. At this time, there have been no significant problems
encountered.
II. Overall Status
A. The real hurdle for the project was to get the policy makers and
community to buy into the concept of developing a parking deck in
the downtown. Although it is the biggest hurdle, it has the least to do
with actually developing the structure. At this point, it is reasonable
to say the entire project is 2% complete.
B. At this time, there is no significant changes in the total project
which would necessitate an amendment to the Caltrans agreement.
C. The estimated completion date for the entire project is still the
same as that identified in the parking deck project schedule, Exhibit
"D', of the Caltrans contract. At this time, there is no deviation from
the agreement schedule.