1994-0405_CALIF, STATE OF_G2a_Item Minutes Public Comment:
David Swerdlin,26172 Via De Toledo,member at-large of the Mobile Home Park Review Committee,spoke
in favor of the recommendation to oppose the subject measure.
Adoption of Resolution Opposing Mobilehome Rent Control,Measure:
It was moved by Council Member Hausdorfer, seconded by Council Member Jones, that the following
Resolution be adopted:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-4-5-1. OPPOSING PJJQPOSED MEASURE _
MOBIL FHOMF WNT ASSISTANCE- MOBIL HO FNT ONTRO
RESTRICTIONS. INITIATIVE STATUTE -A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA,
OPPOSING THE PROPOSED MEASURE ENTITLED MOBILEHOME RENT
ASSISTANCE. MOBILEHOME RENT CONTROL RESTRICTIONS.
INITIATIVE STATUTE.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Council Members Hausdorfer,Jones,Nash,and Mayor Campbell
NOES: None
ABSENT: Council Member Vasquez
DERFCTOR OF ENGINEERING AND BUILDING S .RVI .S
1. REOUEST To CHANGE PROJECT SCOPE AND FUND fl A T
PARKING DECK(DEPARTMENT OF SPORTATI (60MM
Written Communication:
Report dated April 5, 1994, from the Director of Engineering land Building,recommending that the project
scope and funding for the Multi-Modal Parking Deck be revised from a parking deck to an expanded surface
parking area(Option 5)and that funding from Caltrans be reallocated to accommodate Option 5. Option 5
would assume acquisition of the DiMaio property and would maximize the site for parking without a deck by
the use of retaining walls near Camino Capistrano. The report further recommended that if the acquisition
price exceeded$400,000,staff would pursue Option 4,which conformed to the site"notch"configuration.
Mr. Huber made an oral presentation. He stated that any surplus of funds could be transferred to fund any
shortfalls in the railroad platform project. He noted that the landscaping and retaining walls proposed for
Option 5 were conceptual only at this time but that 10-foot wide landscape islands were proposed With regard
to the proposed retaining walls,he stated that the architect preferred that an architectural treatment be used that
would be consistent with the City's high standards,perhaps similar to the wall at the Depot.
Public Comments:
(1) John Gamble,attorney speaking on behalf of Sue DiMaio,felt there was a discrepancy between the
Resolution's stated acquisition amount of 5450,000 and!the acquisition price of$400,000 stated in the
Staff Report recommendation. He suggested that any surplus funds be used to compensate
Ms. DiMaio for her property since he felt there was sufficient flexibility in the proposal to Caltrans
to do so. He inquired about the estimated date for payment of the property.
Mr.Huber indicated that if acquisition of the DiMaio property proved too expensive under Option 5,Option
4 would be implemented for only six less parking spaces. He advised that the grant application would be
submitted to the California Transportation Commission in June or July 1994,with a response shortly thereafter.
City Council Minutes -9- 4/5/94