Loading...
1998-0808_COMPUTER SERVICE COMPANY_H2a_Agenda Report AGENDA ITEM August 18, 1998 TO: George Scarborough, City Manager FROM: William M. Huber, Director of Engineering &Building SUBJECT: Consideration of Rejection of Bid and Authorization to Rebid - Downtown Lighting Program, Phase I (CIP No. 118) RECOMMENDATION By motion, reject the bid from High Light Electric, and authorize Staff to rebid the Downtown Lighting Program, Phase I. A. Summary and Recommendation Bids were opened July 20, 1998, at 2:00 p.m. for Downtown Lighting Program, Phase I. At that date and time, the one bid received exceeded the Engineer's estimate of$150,000 by $118,507. Staff is recommending that City Council reject this bid and authorize Staff to rebid this project for construction starting in January 1999. B. Baclground From March, 1995 through January, 1996, the Business Task Force (BTF), evaluated a series of issues related to improving the business climate in the community. As a result, an issue raised by the BTF involved lighting the downtown area to achieve an environment conducive to improving the setting for shoppers in the evening hours. Subsequently, a light study was carried out to identify current light levels in the downtown and optimum ultimate light levels. The process continued with Commission and City Council review and selection of a light pole and fixture style, and in June 1997, project funding was identified. Approved funding allowed for design in FY 97-98 with the first phase to occur during FY 98-99 at an approximate cost of$180,000, with all four phases estimated at $680,000. At the June 2, 1998, meeting, City Council approved the plans and specifications for Phase I and authorized Staff to purchase the 17 light fixtures for Phase I. These light fixtures have been ordered. Bids were opened July 20, 1998, for the Downtown Lighting Program, Phase I, as follows: High Light Electric $268,507 The Engineer's estimate for the project is $150,000. Staff is recommending that the City Council reject this bid as uncompetitive and exceeding the budget and authorize Staff to rebid the project. /42-J6:Li AGENDA ITEM August 18, 1998 Page2 C. Project Description In F 97-98, funds were budgeted for the preparation and design of plans and specifications. During this time, approximately $680,000 was budgeted for a four year, four phased construction schedule. In FY 98-99, it is anticipated that up to $180,000 will be allocated for the actual construction of the first phase. Consistent with available funding, the following improvements are proposed: 1. Light Fixtures -The project lighting will utilize a metal halide light source, or white lighting to brighten, but not "yellow" the downtown or its buildings. Metal halide is efficient and will contribute to a comfortable downtown setting (other light characteristics include incandescent, mercury vapor, high pressure sodium, and low pressure sodium). Up to 17 light fixtures will be purchased consisting of holophane fixtures catalogue number WA10DMHMTA3 - Lamp, 100 watt medium base metal halide, multi-tap voltage, green housing, IES type 3 glass, gold spike finial with lamp (see Attachment 1). 2. Light Poles-Fiberglass light poles are proposed for the project because they are light weight(which reduces freight charges), are less expensive to install, and the material is long lasting pole. The material is also popular because the color is part of the pole rather than painted on and, therefore, reduces maintenance costs significantly over time. The project proposes up to 17 Shakespeare Poles (catalogue number BCH9-12FS45, Charleston composite pole, 12 feet mounting height, 48" direct burial base, with a duplex outlet box mounted 9" below the top of the pole). The pole is designed to accept the recommended light fixture (see Attachment 2). 3. Light Pole Style - A fluted pole style has been selected because it provides inexpensive ornamentation which can be modest or more extravagant, depending upon the community. It is also a decorative style common to historic downtowns. The base of the pole is 9 inches diameter. The light poles, including the fixture, will have a maximum height of up to 15 1/2 feet. 4. Removal of Existing Light Poles -The project includes the removal and conversion of existing light poles located within the first phase area including two Marbellite poles(one at Forster Street and one at the Provincial Building). These poles will be returned to the City yard for possible re-use in future street pole replacement projects. One wooden pole (at Forster Street)will be removed by SDG&E. AGENDA IT M August 18, 1 98 Page 3 5. Repairs to Private Property - With installation of the new light fixtures comes the repair and replacement to sidewalks, walkways, streets, curbs, landscaping and more, that are impacted by the project's construction. All areas where lighting is proposed must be returned to their original state or better as a result of the project. 6. ADA Access - A minimum of 40" clearance on sidewalks between poles and structures will be maintained in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Access throughout the downtown, as well as proposed improvements, will comply with ADA access requirements. 7. Project Schedule - i. The following first phase schedule was proposed: June 22, 1998: Pre-bid meeting July 20, 1998: Bid August 18, 1998: City Council award of construction contract September 1, 1998: Construction to begin (45 calendar days) October 16, 1998: Construction complete. The City Attorney has informed Staff that an informal bid process is not appropriate and that a formal bid process must be pursued. ii. If an immediate formal bid process is pursued, the earliest schedule would be as follows: August 18, 1998: City Council approves readvertising for formal bids September 21, 1998: Pre Bid meeting September 28, 1998: Bid October 20, 1998: City Council award of contract November 2, 1998: Construction to begin(45 days) December 17, 1998: Construction complete Staff believes that under this scenario construction would be too intrusive for the downtown holiday period. AGENDA ITEM August 18, 1998 Page 4 iii. Staff recommends that construction should be held off until January 1999, as follows: August 18, 1998 City Council approves readvertising for formal bids October 19, 1998 Pre-Bid Meeting November 2, 1998 Bid December 1, 1998 City Council award of contract January 4, 1999 Construction to begin (45 days) February 18, 1999 Construction complete. In pursuing this option, there is a very real possibility of rain delays to construction. 8. Construction Hours - City Council Policy No. 505 requires that construction work for downtown Capital Improvement projects occur during the evening hours in order to avoid possible impacts to the merchants. The specifications call for work to be carried out as follows: Monday to Friday, 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. (night work). Weekends and holidays (work is not permitted). The restrictions on working hours applies to any and all activity related to the construction operation, including, but not limited to, equipment repair and maintenance, warming up of engines, transport of equipment and material, deliveries, and establishing traffic control. 9. First Phase Installation - The first phase is planned to include the 17 poles and locations as follows: First Phase - Light Pole No's to be installed and their location: No. 5: Near the Camino Capistrano entrance to Mercado Village No. 6: North end of El Adobe Plaza facing Camino Capistrano No. 7: Near the Egan House driveway No. 8: El Adobe Restaurant No. 10: Oyharzabal Property No. 11: No easement obtained (Esslinger Bldg.) No. 12: Mini-Park No. 13: Mini-Park No. 14: Avila Adobe No. 15,17,19: Antique Barn Area No. 18: Franciscan Plaza No. 20: Franciscan Plaza No. 21: We 'R Nuts No. 59: Between Franciscan Promenade and Oyharzabal properties No. 63: Mini-Park. AGENDA ITEM August 18, 1998 Page 5 COMMISSIONBOARD REVIEW, RECOMMENDATIONS The project was reviewed by the City's Environmental Administrator and determined to be categorically exempt, Class I, Existing Facilities (Section 15301). FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS Funds including downtown lighting equipment purchase and installation are budgeted in Account No. 118 in FY 1998-1999 in the amount of$180,000. Purchase of 17 light fixtures, including shipping costs and sales tax, is $10,928. Purchase of light poles including shipping and sales tax is $12,748.98. Total equipment costs will be $23,676.98. Engineer's estimate for construction as shown on plans and in the specifications is $150,000, for a total expenditure of$175,000. NOTIFICATION High Light Electric ALTERNATE ACTIONS 1. Reject the bid from High Light Electric in the amount of$268,507 for Downtown Lighting Program, Phase I. Authorize Staff to rebid the project. 2. Authorize Staff to re-advertise for formal bids. 3. Request additional information from Staff. RECOMMENDATION By motion, reject the bid from High Light Electric, and authorize Staff to rebid the Downtown Lighting Program, Phase I. Respectful) S bmitted, repared by e? ill° illiam M. Huber, P.E. Brian Perry, P.E. Director, Engineering & Building Project Manager WMH/BP:s!g 8-18dntn.bp