Loading...
18-1002_MISSION COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES, INC._E9_Supplementary Agenda Report101212018 E9 City of San Juan Capistrano Supplementary Agenda Report TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council â(FROM: /Venjamin Siegel, City Manager SUBMITTED BY: Jeffrey Ballinger, City Attorney DATE: October 2,2018 SUBJECT Joint Defense Agreement with Mission Commercial Properties, lnc., Regarding Confidential Communications and Joint Representation in Connection with the City's Approval of Final Construction Plans for the Plaza Banderas Hotel, for Propedy Located at26871and 26891 Ortega Highway RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the City Manager and City Attorney to execute the Joint Defense Agreement with Mission Commercial Properties, lnc., in substantially the form attached hereto, in connection with the City's approval of the final construction plans for a Hotel and related uses, for property located at26871 and 26891 Ortega Highway (APN Nos. 124-170-12, - 14, -15, and -16) (Plaza Banderas Hotel). SITUATION: After posting of the agenda, the additional language below was added under Section 14.8 of the Joint Defense Agreement under Section 14.8: SECTION 14. lndemnification. B. Counsel for the City shall include Jeffrey S. Ballinger and Alisha M. Wintersvuyk, as well as other attorneys and paralegals of Best Best & Krieger LLP (the "City Attorney"). The City's reasonable attorneys' fees and costs in defending the Litigation shall be reimbursed by Real Party as follows: (i) a separate billing file for litigation shall be opened by the City Attorney; (ii) the time shall be billed in 0.1 hour increments; (iii) City's attorneys' fees and costs shall be invoiced monthly with a statement to Real Party redacted to preserve confidential information; and (iv) no cost in excess of $500 shall be incurred without Real Party's prior written approval. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Real Party's reimbursement shall be conditioned upon the City's cooperation with Real Party in the Litigation and joint defense of the Project. Additionally. Real Party has raised a potential City Council Agenda Report October 2,2018 Page 2 of 2 conflict of interest on the part of the Citv Attorney that Real Party believes could require the Citv to have different counsel than the Attornev represent the Citv in the Litiqation. Nothing about this Aqreement is meant to waive that issue nor to waive any riqhts or remedies of Real Pa¡fv related to that conflict rssue ATTACHMENT Attachment 1 - Revised Joint Defense Agreement JOTNT NONDISCLOSI'RE, INDEMMTY, AND LITIGATION DEÍENSE AGREEMANT BY AND BETWEEN TIIE CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFOR¡{IA, AND MISSION COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES,INC. This Joint Nondisc tosurç, þdemnity, an/¡lit$?Iion Ðefense Agreement ( "Agreement") is made and entered into ttris - i -"' day of€effiË61?018, by and between the City of San Juan Capistrano, California (the "City') and Mission Commercial Properties, Inc. ("Real Party"). The City and Real Party are sometimes rcfened to herein individually as a "Party''and collectively as the "Parties." Recitals A. The City is a municipal corporation situated in the County of Orange in the State of California. B. Real Pany is a California corporation and acts on behalf of the owner of the property located at 2687 I and 2689 I Ortega Highway, San Juan Capistrano, California ('?laza Banderas"). C. On October 19, 2010, the City Council certif¡ed the Final Environrnental Impact Report for the Plaza Banderas Hotel Project ("Original Froject") and the entitlements for the Original Project including a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation (6PA t$.00l), the Plaza Banderas Hote! Comprehensive Developrnent Plan (CDP l&01) and a Rezone to the City's Zoning Map (RZ 10-001). D. The City Council's approval included a Condition of Approval (No. 59) requiring the Planning Commission to review and approve the project's Conceptual Design Plans, On March 8, 201l, the Planning Commission reviewed and approved the pmject's Conceptual Design Plans, satisfying Condition No.59. E. The 2010 City Council approval also included a Condition of Approval (No. 60) requiring the project's Final Construction Plans to be reviewed ¿nd approved by the Design Review Committee (DRC) to ensure consistency with the City-approved Conceptual Design Plans. F. On July 13,2017, January I1,2018, and February 8,2018, DRC reviewed and voted unanimously to approve the project's Final Construction Flans, finding that the architectural design of the Final Construction Plans for the three buildings was consistent with the 201I Planning Commission approved Conceptual Design Plans. G. On January 25,2018, the City recsived an appeal of the DRC's determination made on January I1,2018 (the "First Appeal"). The First Appeal was filed by Steve Behmerwohld, asserting he wâs a resident and representative of Save Our Mission - San Juan Capistrano, c/o Charles S. Krolikowski, Newmeyer & Dillion, LLP. 6 t l 47.&xxnÂ309n6524.6 Attachment L H. On February 22,2018, the City received an appealof the DRC's determination made on February 8, 2018 (the "Second Appeal"). The Second Appeal was filed by Steve Behmerwohld, asserting he was a resident and representative of Save Our Mission - San Juan Capistrano, c/o Charles S, Krolikowski, Newmeyer & Dillion, LLP. The First Appeal and Second Appeal together refened to hereinafter as the Appeals. L On March 24,2418, the City Council conducted a duly-noticed appeal hearing on the Appeals pursuant to San Juan Capistrano Municipal Code Section 9-2,31l; based upon the oral and written evidence presented, as well as the ent¡rety of the administrative record, the City Council rejected the Appeals and upheld the DRC's January I l, 2018 and February 8, 2018 determinations. J. On April 13, 2018, the Save Our Mission - San Juan Capistrano, a purported unincorporated association of concerned residents ("Petitioner"), filed a lawsuit in the County of Orange Superior Court, Save Our Míssion- San Juan Capistrano v. City of San luan Capistrano et ul.,Case No. 30-2018-00986220-CU-WM-CXC (the "Litigation"), which challenges the City's approval, alleging inter alía that the City failed to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). K. City Council Resolution No. l0-10-05-05, Condition No.4, provides that the applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees and agents from and against any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void or annul any approval or condition of approval concerning this project, including but not limited to any approval or condition of approval of the City Council, Planning Commission, Design Review Committee, or Development Services Director. L. Based upon information currently available, without admitting any individual or shared liability, and expressty denying same, the Parties believe they have similar and common legal interests in the prosecution of the Litigation and the claims that will likely be contained therein, and any matters relating thereto. The Parties further believe it is to their individual and mutual benefit to cooperate and share information, strategy and documents conceming issues arising out of or relating to those claims, including, but not limited to, information and documents that may be subject to the attorney-client privilege, attorney work-product doctrine, andlor any other applicable privilege or immunity existing under state or federal law, effective as of the commencement of this Agreement or ther€after. M. The Parties intend to vigorously defend against Petitioner's claims. Accordingly, the Parties have a common interest in the defense of future claims raised against them in the Litigation. Each of the Parties intends to appear in the Litigation, oppose the Litigation, and may represent its own separate interests, some of which may be unique. Such representation of separate or unique interests is not inconsisten¡ with the common interests of the Parties. N. Nothing in this Agreement is meant or should be construed to abrogate the City's legal obligation to exercise independent judgment as required by the CEQA concerning the project, or consideration of project approvals. 2 6l l4?,80(mBo9965?4.6 O. In defending against the Litigation and similar challenges to the project from other third parties in the future, the Parties have interests in common and will litigate common claims and have legal theories in common, and will benefit if they can communicate openly with each other about all matters relating to the evaluation of and possible legal challenges to the City's actions on the project. P. [n order to promote full and effective communication between the Parties, and to avoid duplicative efforts by them and to minimize the costs of litigation, the Pa¡ties desire to share attorney-client andlor work-product privileged information and other privileged information conceming the Litigation noted in the above recitals, but the parties wish to ensurc that any such sharing of information will not diminish in any way the confidentiality of such information and will not constitute a waiver of any applicable privileges. a. This Agreement also confirms that, to the extent the Parties and/or their attorneys have already been in communication with each other since any privileges became operative under any applicable law, their communications and work product rvere then, and remain now, subject to the joint defense privilege and now are subject to this Agreement. Agreement Now, therefore, the Parties, in consideration of their mutual promises and the foregoing recitals that are incorporated herein, agree as follows: l. Agreement. In order to pursue a joint legal effort effectively, the Parties agree that their mutual interests in conducting coordinated litigation efforts andlor investigating, taking measures to prevent or other activities in respect of claims, potential claims or regulatory proceedings may be best served by exchanging or disclosing among themselves and their counsel Privileged lnformation, as that term is defined below, provided, however, that nothing herein shall compel the Parties to coordinate defense efforts or to sha¡e any such Privileged Information. The coordination of defense efforts and the sharing of Privileged Information shall be entirely voluntary. l.l Definition of Joint Defense. All work performed by the attorneys for the Parties pursuant to this Agreement and communications among the attorneys for the Parties in connect¡on with such representation of their respective clients shall be conducted and protected pursuant to the joint defense doctrine recognized in such federal court cases as United States v. McPartlin,sgs F.3d 1321, 1336-37 (TthCir;),cert. denied,444 U.S.833 (1979); Hunydee v. United States, 355 F.2d 183 (9th Cir. 1965); and Continental Oil Co. v. Uníted States,33o F.2d 347 (9th Cir. 1964); and as contemplated in the California cases of Calífornìa Oak Foundation v. County of Telønm, 174 C,rl. App. 4th 1217,1222-23 (2009); Oxy Resources California LLC v. Superior Court, I 15 Cal. App. 4th 874 Q0A$; and Raytheon Co. v. Superíor Court,208 Cal. App. 3d 683 (1989); and in California Evidence Code section 952 and/or recognized under state and federal law, including such rights that exist independent of rights described in this Agreement. 3 ót t47 8m08\30996s?4,6 1.2 Definition of Privileged Information. Privileged Information, as used herein, shall include all writings as defined in California Evidence Code section 250, including all oral, electronic or written communications including, but no[ Iimited to, meeting agendas, memoranda prepared by in-house and outside counsel, analyses, drafts of pleadings or comments to regulatory authorities, or other materia.ls or information, furnished by any Pafty to another Party or Parties involving matters related to the Litigation, or any other summary, analysis, report or other document containing information extracted, obtained or derived from such communications, but excluding such materials or discussions which have been made public or disclosed to third parties without restriction as to use or disclosure. Privileged Information shall only be used by the Parties in connection with their rights to be informed about matters related to the Litigation. 1.3 Umited Disclosure. No Party shall disclose the Privileged Information received under this Agreement to any person other than its directors, officers, employees, legal counsel, accountants, agents and subcontractors (collectively, the "Qualified Persons") who require knowledge of the Privileged Information for the purpose of evalu¿ting or conducting the Litigation, and in no even[ shall such disclosure cause the Privileged Information to become a record subject to disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act. Each attorney for a Party shall inform such Party's Qualifred Persons of the privileged nature of the Privileged Information. Each such Qualified Person shall be bound by the terms of this Agreement prior to any disclosure. If any Party violates the tenns of this paragraph, such disclosure(s) shall not have been authorizcd and, therefore, shall not constitute a waiver of any applicable privilege. Each Party shall be responsible for any breach of this Agreement by its Qualified Persons- 2. Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement is to ensure that such exchange or disclosure of Privileged Information in furtherance of the Pa¡ties' joint legal efforts does not diminish in any way the confidentiality of the Privileged Information or constitute a waiver of any privilege or protection accorded to the Privileged Information, and the Parties hereby declare their intent that no sharing of information as s€t forth above shall waive the applicable attorney work-product privilege, attorney-client privilege, trade secret privilege, the joint defense privilege, or any other applicable privilege, protection or doctrine. To the maximurn extent permitted by law, the sharing of Privileged Information shall be undertaken in a manner that protects Privileged Information from public disclosure under the Ralph M. Brown Act, the Calífornia Public Records Act or other applicable law. 3. Marking Wrinen Materials. All wrinen Privileged Information exchanged will be clearly ma¡ked 'CONFIDENTIAL: SUBJECT TO JOINT LffICATION PRIVILEGE," or*SHARED UNDER THE JOINT NONDISCLOSURE AND LITTGATTON ACREEMENT AMONC PARTIES," oT "SUBJECT TO JOINT LITIGATION PRIVILECE." The Parties will use their best efforts to so mark all such written materials, and will instruct their attorneys, paralegals, and clerical and other personnel as to this requirement, provided, however, that failure to mark such exchanged written materials shall not be treated as waiving the joint litigation privilege as to any materials not so marked. This requirement for rnarking of materials is prospective in nature and does not apply to materials previously exchanged pursuant to oral or wrinen joint defense agreements not containing a requirement for such marking. 4 6 r 14? 80008\30996524 ó 4. Exceptions. The restrictions of this Agreement on use and disclosure of Privileged Information shall not apply to information that: a) is in the possession or control of a Party at the time of its disclosure hereunder free of any obligation of Party to keep such Privileged Information confidential; b) is or becomes publicly known or available, by actions not in violation of this Agreement; c) is received by a Party from a third party free to disclose it without obligation to any other P*yt d) is disclosed to third parties without restriction as to its use or disclosure by the Party who alone has prepared or obtained the information disclosed, and which information cont¿ins no privileged or protected information obtained directly or indirectly from another Party; e) is approved for re lease by written authorization of the Pa¡ties; or f) is required to be disclosed pursuant to any applicable statute, law, rule or order of any governmental authority or pursuant to any order of any court of competent jurisdiction. 5. Protected Communications. The Privileged Information addressed herein represents communications subject to the joint attorney work-product privilege anüor the attorney-cl¡ent privilege and/or the joint defense doctrine and/or the trade secret privilege as defined by California law (collectively, 'Toint Defense Communications"). [f used by a Pûrty hereunder for purposes other than internal evaluation of legal issues related to the Litigation, such use would unfairly prejudice and irreparably harm the rights and interests of all the Parties. Each of the Parties and counsel agree that any Joint Defense Communications they receive from any other Party or its representatives shall be treated and maintained as privileged and confidential communications. Execution of this Agreement constitutes mutual âgreement that any consultations among the Parties and their respective counsel, and any sharing or pooling of work product or other confrdential docurnents, a¡e reasonably necessary for the accomplishment of the purpose for which the Parties' counsel have been consulted and retained. The Parties agree that any consultations among them or their counsel, and any sharing or pooling of work product or other confidential documents, are in reliance on the joint litigants' privilege. The Parties further agree that the joint lit¡gants' privilege as it relates to the consultations, information, data and other documents covered by this Agreement may not be waived except with the consent of the Parties. 6. Third-Part}¡ Claims of Waiver. Should any third party claim that an otherwise applicable privilege has been waived as a result of any exchange or disclosure of Privileged Information made pursuant to this Agreement, the Parties agree to join in defending such claim of privilege or protection. 5 6r r{7.8{X}08130996524.6 7. Disclosure Requirqments. If a Party or its Qualified Persons become subject to a bona fide requirement by law, regutation, deposition questions, interrogatories, Public Records Act request, Freedom of Information Act request, other type of request for information or documents, subpoena, civil investigative dernand or sirnilar process (collectively, a "Requirement") to disclose any Privileged Information, such Pany (i) will, prior to producing any Privileged Information, promptly notify all other Parties of the existence, terms and circumstances of such Requiremen(s) so that any other Party may seek an appropriate protective order, and (ii) will cause its Qualified Persons to cooperate fully with any other Party in seeking a protective order. If a Party subject to a Requirement, who has complied with the notification and cooperation obligations described in the preceding sentênce, is compelled, in the opinion of its legal counsel, to disclose Privileged Information or else stand liable for contempt or other substantial penalty, such Party will furnish only that portion of the Privileged lnformation which is legally required pursuant to the tems of such Requirement as modified by any protective order. 8. Disclosure to Clients. Counsel receiving Joint Defense Communications and materials may disclose those communications to their respective clients, but may not disclose such Joint Defense Communications to any other person without the consenÈ of the Party providing the privileged and confidential information. Any unauthorized disclosure of any Joint Defense Communications to any third party shall not constitute a waiver of any applicable privilege. 9. Çqveming Law. This Agreement and any dispute hereunder shall be govemed by and construed in accordance with the internal laws, other than the choice of laws, of the State of Califomia. 10. No rffarranty. No Party makes ony w¡uranty of any nature with respect to any Privileged Information, including the accuracy and completeness thereof, provided to any other Party pursuant to this Agreement. I l, No Waj:¡:r. This Agreement shall not create any agency or similar relationship between or among the Parties. No Party shall have authority to waive any applicable privilege, protection or doctrine on behalf of any other Party; nor shall any waiver of any applicable privilege, protection or doctrine by the conduct of any Party be construed to apply to any other Party. No failure or delay in exercising any right, power or privilege hereunder shall operate as a waiver thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise thereof preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any right, power or privilege hereunder. 12. No Panpçrshio or Joint Entity. This Agreement is not intended to and does not create a partnership or any other form of single or joint entity of any sort comprised of the Parties and/or their attorneys. 13. No Obligation to Share Information Not Shared or Exchaneed. Nothing herein shall obligaæ a Party to share or exchange Privileged Information that has not been shared or exchanged pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. 6 ó t I 47,80008\3099ó5!4,ó 14. Indemnification. A. Real Party shall indemnify and pay for the reasonable cost of defense (with counsel as provided herein) for the City, its officials (appointed or elected), ofFrcers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalit¡es thereof in the Litigation. B. Counsel for the City shall include Jeffrey S. Ballinger and Alisha M. Winterswyk, as well as other attorneys and paralegals of Best Best & Krieger LLP (the "City Attorney"). The City's reasonable attomeys' fees and costs in defending the Litigation shall be reimbursed by Real Party as follows: (i) a separate billing f¡le for litigation shall be opened by the City Attorney; (ii) the time shall be billed in 0.1 hour increments; (iii) City's attorneys' fees and costs shall be invoiced monthly with a statement to Real Party redacted to preserve conf,rdential information; and (iv) no cost in excess of $500 shall be incurred without Real Party's prior written approval. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Real Party's reimbursement shall be conditioned upon the City's cooperation with Real Party in the Litigation and joint defense of the Project. Additionally, Real Party has raised a potential conflict of interest on the part of the City Attorney that Real Party believes could require the City to have different counsel than the City Attorney represent the City in the Litigation. Nothing about this Agreement is meant to waive that issue nor to waive any rights or remedies of Real Party related to that conflict issue. C. Counsel for Real Party and the City Attomey for the City shall reasonably cooperate with each other in connection with their respective investigations and the Litigation. City and City Attorney shall provide Real Party, its consultants, investigators, experts, and counsel, access to the City's public frles and documents upon request during normal business hours. D. Each Party shall communicate promptly to the other Party any offers received for the settlement of the Litigation. City shall secure Real Party's consent to any settlement. Real Party shall secure the City's consent to any settlement. Such consent shall not be unreasonably withheld by either Party. 15. Acknowledement of Indegendent Representatign. Each Party understands and acknowledges that it is represented only by its own attorneys in the Litigation, and that nothing in this Agreement creates an attorney-client relationship between such Party and the attorney for any other Party. While attorneys representing a Party have a duty to preserve the confidentiality of Privileged Information disclosed to them pursuant to this Agreement, such attorneys will not be acting for anyone other than their respective client or clienrs in doing so. The attorneys representing a Party owe duties, including the duties of care and loyalty, only to their respective client or clients, and nothing in this Agreement creates any duties between a Party and counsel for any other Party. 16. Entire Aereement: Apendments. This Agreement represents the entire agreement of the Parties in connection with the subject matter hereof and rnay be modified only in writing agreed to by all Parties. 7 6t 14? 8{Ð08\30965246 17. Authority. The signatories hereto represent and wanant that they have been duly authorized fo enter into this Agreement by the Party on whose behalf it is indicated that the person is signing and, by such signature, to bind such Party to the Agreement. 18. Captionq. The captions of the various articles and paragraphs are for convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment or describe the scope, content or intent of this Agreement. 19. Effective Date: Terminatio!. This Agreement shall become effective as of the date first above written and shall exist in perpetuity unless it is terminated upon written notice by any Party or upon the resolution of the Litigation. Nevertheless, the Parties agr€e that privileged communications occurred before formalizing this Agreernent, including communications that occuned leading up to and following the approval on March 20, 2018, and those comrnunications are and continue to be protected under the common interest doctrine. The confidentiality obligations and use lirnitations of the Parties with respect to Privileged Information previously exchanged shall remain in full force and effect, without regard to whether this Agreement is terminated or whether any particula¡ aetion is terminated by final judgment or settlement. In the event any Party settles or is otherwise dismissed from the Litigation, or for any other reason ceases to participate in this Agreement, such Party shall be obligated to continue to preserve the confidentiality of Privileged Information and any and all privileges perta¡ning to Privileged Information as though the Party were still part of the joint prosecution/defense Íurang€ment. The Parties lgree that, in the event any Party determines that it no longer has, or no longer will have, mutuality of interest in a joint defense for any reason, including but not limited to a conflict of interest between the Parties, that Party will promptly notify the other Parties of its intent to withdraw from this Agreement, A written notice of termination shall constitute a termination of this Agleement, provided, however, that no such termination shall affect or irnpair the obligations of confidentiality and privilege with respect to Privileged lnformation previously furnished pursuant to this Agreement. Any party so withdrawing will im¡nediately return all copies of any written materials provided. 20. Beservation of Riehts and Cl&ims. Each of the Parties mutually reserves all rights and claims against the other Party arising out of the alleged conduct and actions alleged in the Litigation or arising out of a conflict of interest between the Parties, as well as all defenses that arÊ or may be available to each of the Parties. The Parties waive any right to seek disqualification of any other Party's attomey based on that attorney's receipt of confidential or Privileged Information subject to this Agreement which was received while this Agreement was in effect. The Parties agree that the existence of this Agreement shall not be disclosed or used offensively or defensively in any proceeding involving the Litigation (except that this Agreement may be disclosed or used by any Party hereto in any proceeding to maintain and protect, consistent with the intent of this Agreement, the confidentiality of all Privileged Information); nor will any Party claim that any counsel to a Party is disqualified from any proceeding by re¡tson of this Agreement or the sharing of Privileged Information under this Agreement. 21. Independent Prosecution or Defense. Nothing in this Agreement shall limit or interfere with the right and ability of a Party to conduct its own independent prosecution or defense of matters relating to the Litigation and the claims therein, including filing appropriate I 6 r r47.80008\10996524.ó motions, conducting separate and independent discovery, entering into individual settlements, or othenvise engaging in pretrial procedures for the benefit of the Party. 22. Confidentiality. The Parties and their attorneys each agree to keep confidential the existence of, and the terms of, this Agreement except to the extent required to enforce its provisions or as required by the Ralph M. Brown Act, the California Public Records Act, or any olher applicable law or stâtute. 23. Severabilily. In the event that any covenant, condition or other provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid, void or illegal by a court of competent jurisdictiçn, it shall be deemed severable from the remainder and shall in no way affect, impair or invalidate any other covenant, condition or provision of this Agreement. 24. Supplementa{v Activity. The Parties agree to cooperate fully and to execute any and all supplementary documents and to take all additional actions that may be necessary or appropriate to give full force to the basic terms and intent of this Agreement, and which Í¡re not inconsistent with its terms. 25. Remedies. Breach of this Agreernent by unauthorized disclosure will cause irreparable harm for which there is no legal remedy, thereby entitling the other Party to seek injunctive or equitable relief, including, without limitation, specific performance of this Agreement or an injunction against breach of this Agreement. 26. Attornevs' Fees: Venue: In the event that either Party shall commence any legal action or proceeding to enforce or interpret this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover its costs of suit, including reasonable attomeys' fees. The venue for any litigation shall be Orange County. In the event of any asserted ambiguity in, or dispute regarding, the interpretation of any matter herein, the interpretation of this Agreement shall not bd resolved by any rules of interpretation providing for interpretation against the party who causes the uncertainty to exist or against the drafting party. This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted under the laws of the State of California. 21. Successors and Assiggs. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the succ€ssors, successors-in-interesl, assigns or affiliates ofthe Parties. 28. Others Joinine Agrepment. Any person wanting to join this Agreement must be approved by unanimous agreement of the original Parties to this Agreement. 29. Consultants. This Agreement shall apply to any and all consultants retained by each ofthe Pa¡ties and to each Party's legal counsel. 30. Notices. All notices and demands of any kind which any Party may require or dèsire to serve on the other in connection with this Agreement must be served in writing either by personal service or by registered or certified mail, retum receipt requested, and shall be deposited in the United States mail, with postage thcreon fully prepaid, and addressed to the Party so to be served as follows: 9 6 I t47.8û008\309fró524.ó To The City: Benjamin Siegel, City Manager City of San Juan Capistrano 32400 Paseo Adelanto San Juan Capistrano, CA92675 \{ith a copy to: Jeffrey S. Ballinger, City Attorney Best Best & Krièger LLP 655 West Broadway, l5th Floor San Diego, CA 92101 To Real Party: Mission €ommercial Properties, Inc. Jake Griffith 3 1866 Camino Capistrano San Juan Capisuano, CA92675 lVith a copy to: K. Erik Friess Allen Matkins 1900 Main Street,5th Roor Irvine CA92614-7321 31. Countergrts and Facsimilg jsnatures. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, all of which, when taken together, shall coostitute the agreement of the Pa¡ties. Facsimile and email transmitted copies of signed counterparts of this Agreement shall be deemed as authentic and valid as an original of this Agreement. 32. No Admissions. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed to constitute an admission of any liability on the part of any Party with respect to the Litigation or any issues or claims related thereto, or other mattÊrs associated therewith. (Signatures on following page) 6l t4?.80m880y)65t4.6 t0 IN Ìü/ITNESS VfHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Joint Nondisclosurc, Indemnity and Litigation Defense Agreement on the daæ tirst set forth above. SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, a municipal MISSION COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES, corporation INC., a California By:IBenjamin Siegel, City Manager By: Date:Title: Date: ATTEST: By: K. Maria Morris, City Clerk Date: APPROYED AS TO FORM: By: Jeffrey S. Ballinger, City Attorney Date: 6 I I 47.8{Xt08\309965 24.6 ll