Loading...
Resolution Number 17-12-05-01RESOLUTION NO. 17-12-05-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATIER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE (ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBERS 664-251-31) (CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LADER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE) Whereas, Gary Miller, Miller Architecture, 1177 Idaho Street, Suite 200, Redlands, CA 92374 (the "Applicant"}, has requested approval of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Meetinghouse. The request has been submitted in the form of a Code Amendment (CA) 14-006, Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 14-018, Architectural Control (AC) 14-033, and Grading Plan Modification (GPM) 16-008. Together, these entitlements would allow for the development of a new church 16,558 square foot Meetinghouse/Cultural Hall building and chapel with 292 fixed seats and pews on the 4.54-acre site located at 29273 Stallion Ridge; and specifically located the north side of Stallion Ridge (formerly Vista Montana), northwest of the Avenida La Pata and Stallion Ridge intersection; and, Whereas, Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church, 18101 Von Karman Ave., Suite 1000, Irvine, CA 92612, are the owners of real property located at Assessor's Parcel Numbers 664-251-31; and, Whereas, the Project has been processed pursuant to Section 9-2.309, Code Amendment 14-006, Section 9-2.317, Conditional Use Permit, and Section 9-2.313, Architectural Control, and Section 9-2.323, Grading Plan Modification (GPM) of Title 9, Land Use Code of the City of San Juan Capistrano; and, Whereas, the Environmental Administrator has reviewed the initial study prepared pursuant to Section 15063 and 15064 of the CEQA Guidelines, has issued a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) pursuant to Section 15070 of those guidelines; has caused a Notice of Mitigated Negative Declaration to be posted pursuant to Section 15072 of those guidelines, and has otherwise complied with all applicable provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (1970); and all mitigation measures have been included herein; and, Whereas, the City Council has considered the Environmental Administrator's determination pursuant to Section 1507 4 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and, Whereas, the Planning Commission conducted a duly-noticed public hearing on October 24, 2017 pursuant to Title 9, Land Use Code, Section 9-2.302 and City Council Policy 5 to consider public testimony on the proposed project and considered all relevant public comments and recommended City Council approval; and, 1 12/5/2017 Whereas, the City Council conducted a duly-noticed public hearing on December 5, 2017 pursuant to Title 9, Land Use Code, Section 9-2.302 and City Council Policy 5 to consider public testimony on the proposed project and considered all relevant public comments; and, Whereas, the Mitigated Negative Declaration adequately addressed and mitigated, to the extent feasible, the potential environmental impacts associated with the Project, which includes a new church and associated improvements; and, Whereas, the City is the lead agency for purposes of the Project pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21 067; and, Whereas, the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been provided to and has been reviewed by the City Council, which is available for inspection at City Hall and on the City's website, and are incorporated herein by reference; and, Whereas, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, as follows: SECTION 1. The above recitations are true and correct and adopted as the findings of the City Council. SECTION 2. Compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. As the decision-making body for the Project, the City Council has reviewed and considered the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project. The City Council finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration contains a complete and accurate reporting of the environmental impacts associated with the Project. The City Council further finds that Mitigated Negative Declaration and the administrative record have been completed in compliance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's Local CEQA Guidelines. The City Council further finds and determines that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the City's independent judgment. SECTION 3. Fi ndings Regarding Environmental Impacts. Based on the substantial evidence set forth in the record, including but not limited to the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the City Council finds that the an Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate document for the Project. The City Council does hereby make the following findings as established by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): a) The City Council finds on the basis of the evidence presented and the whole record before it, including the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Exhibit "A" (SCH# 2017081070), and comments received, that there is no substantial evidence that the Project, as mitigated, will have a significant effect on the environment; and, 2 12/5/2017 b) The Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "8" and incorporated herein, will assure compliance with the mitigation measures during Project implementation; and, c) The City Council's adoption of the MND reflects the City Council's independent judgment and analysis; and, d) The record of proceedings on which the City Council's adoption is based is located at City Hall for the City of San Juan Capistrano, located at 32400 Paseo Adelanto, San Juan Capistrano, California and the custodian of record of proceedings is the Development Services Department Administrative Coordinator; and, SECTION 4. Notice of Determination . The City Council directs City staff to prepare, execute, and file a Notice of Determination with the Orange County Clerk within five (5) working days of the approval of the Modified Project. SECTION 5. Custodian of Records and Location of Documents. The Mitigated Negative Declaration, the Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and all other documents constituting the administrative record for the Modified Project are on file and available for public review at City Hall, located at 32400 Paseo Adelanto, San Juan Capistrano, California. The custodian of the record of proceedings is the Development Services Department Administrative Coordinator. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of San Juan Capistrano hereby adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Meetinghouse. PROTEST OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS: Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020, the applicant may protest the imposition of fees, dedications, reservations or other exactions imposed on this development project by taking the necessary steps and following the procedures established by Sections 66020 through 66022 of the California Government Code. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of December 2017 . \_ ATTE ST : ,d ~ ~--- S ~RGIO FARIAS, MAYOR 3 12/5/2017 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss . CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO ) I, MARIA MORRIS, appointed City Clerk of the City of San Juan Capistrano, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolu t ion No . 17-12-05-01 was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of San Juan Capist ra no at the Regular meeting thereof, held the 5th day of December 2017, by the following vote: MA COUNCIL MEMBERS: Reeve, Maryott and Mayor Farias fl COUNCIL MEMBERS: None {/ COUNCIL MEMBERS: Patterson : COLJNCIL MEMBERS: Ferguson 4 12/5/2017 Subject: EXHIBIT A POSTED '•. AUG 3 1 2017 HUGH NGUYEN, CLERK·RfPRDER BY: c~ DEPUTY NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION From: Development Services Department 32400 Paseo Adelanto San Juan Capistrano, California 92675 Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Meetinghouse Project; an application to develop a 16,558-square-foot meetinghouse/cultural hall building and chapel located on the north side of Stallion Ridge (formerly Vista Montana), northwest of the Avenida La Pata and Stallion Ridge intersection in San Juan Capistrano, California (Assessor's Parcel Number 664-251-31). NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of San Juan Capistrano has prepared and intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) in connection with the Proposed Project. The MND identifies potential effects with respect to environmental resources . The MND also includes proposed mitigation measures that will ensure that the Proposed Project would not result in any significant, adverse effects on the environment. The City's decision to prepare a MND should not be construed as a recommendation of either approval or denial of this Proposed Project. The Initial Study which serves as the substantial evidence and as a basis for the MND, is available for public review and can be found on the City's website at: http://sanjuancaptstrano.org/DepartmentstDevelopmentServices/P ianninqZoning/Environmental -Documents and is available in the Development Services Department at City Hall located at 32400 Paseo Adelanto, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 . PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Proposed Project site consists of an approximately 4.54-acre property that is generally located on the north side of Stallion Ridge (formerly Vista Montana), northwest of the Avenida La Pata and Stallion Ridge intersection in the City. The Proposed Project entails development of a 16,558-square-foot Meetinghouse/Cultural Hall building and chapel with 292 fixed seats and pews on the 4.54-acre site. The maximum occupancy of the proposed Meetinghouse/Cultural Hall building and chapel is estimated to be 1,151 persons. The building includes a multi-purpose room which is intended to be used for basketball, volleyball, and dining purposes. The remainder of the proposed Meetinghouse/Cultural Hall building consists of offices, classrooms, and support uses. The Project also includes a storage shed, an outdoor 1 ,990-square-foot pavilion, and a trash enclosure. The proposed parking area would include 229 parking spaces and access to the Project site would be provided from Stallion Ridge (formerly Vista Montana) and from the San Juan Hills High School private access road. Because the Whispering Hills Estates Planned Community Comprehensive Development Plan (COP 04-01) envisioned single family residential uses on the Project site, an amendment to CDP 04-01 would be required for the Proposed Project. PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD: The public review period is from Friday. September 1. 2017 to Monday, October 2. 2017. PROJECT MANAGER: Mr. David Contreras, Senior Planner; phone: (949) 443-6320; e-mail: dcontrer's@sanj t~ancaplstrcu o .qtg ; fax: (949) 661 -5451 ; mailing address: Development Services Department. 32400 Paseo Adelanto , San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the City invites members of the general public to review and comment on the MND. Written comments may be mailed, emailed, or faxed to the Project Manager. Copies of the MND and supporting documents are available for public review at the Development Services Department located in City Hall at 32400 Paseo Adelanto, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675. The City's Planning Commission and City Council will conduct public hearings at future dates to be determined. You will receive a separate public notice for those he~rings. If you challenge this Proposed Project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised during the public review period on the Mitigated NeQ_atlve Declaration (MND) or at the future public hearings. By orcfe of Sergio Klotz Environmental Administrator P OS TED I AUG 3 1 201l HUGH NGUYEmCOHOEP. BY: .• _P.f:.PIIT\ PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND INITIAL STUDY FOR THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT SEPTEMBER 2017 Prep a red for: City of San Juan Capistrano Development Services Department 32400 Paseo Adelanto San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Prepared by: De Novo Planning Group 1020 Suncast Lane, Suite 106 ElDorado Hills, CA 95762 (916) 580-9818 De Novo Planning Group A Land Use Planning, Design, and Environmental Firm PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND INITIAL STUDY FOR THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT SEPTEMBER 2 017 Prepared for: City of San Juan Capistrano Development Services Department 32400 Paseo Adelanto San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Prepared by: De Novo Planning Group 1020 Suncast Lane, Suite 106 ElDorado Hills, CA 95762 (916) 580-9818 Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Meetinghouse Project Lead Agency: City of San Juan Capistrano Development Services Department 32400 Paseo Adelanto San Juan Capistrano, CA 926 75 Project Title: Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Meetinghouse Project Location: The project site is located on the north side of Stallion Ridge (formerly Vista Montana), northwest of the Avenida La Pata and Stallion Ridge intersection in San Juan Capistrano, California. The project site totals approximately 4.54 acres and is currently undeveloped. While the project site is undeveloped, the site has been mass graded in conjunction with the overall grading associated with the adjacent high school and the Whispering Hills Estate subdivision. The Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) for the project site is 664-251-31. Project Description: The project includes development of a 16,558-square-foot Meetinghouse/Cultural Hall building and chapel with 292 fixed seats and pews on the 4.54-acre site. The maximum occupancy of the proposed Meetinghouse/Cultural Hall building and chapel is estimated to be 1,151 persons. The building includes a multi- purpose room which is intended to be used for basketball, volleyball, and dining purposes. The remainder of the proposed Meetinghouse/Cultural Hall building consists of offices, classrooms, and support uses. The project also includes a storage shed, an outdoor 1,990-square-foot pavilion, and a trash enclosure. The proposed parking area would include 229 parking spaces. Access to the project site would be provided from Stallion Ridge (formerly Vista Montana) and from the San Juan Hills High School private access road. The proposed church building has a "Tuscan Revival" architectural style. This architectural style is one of the recommended styles in the City of San Juan Capistrano's Architectural Design Guidelines. The church building has a roof height of 3 7-feet, 8-inches. The church building and the pavilion will include concrete Mission roof tile and will be painted with earth-tone colors; and include cultured stone. Landscaping is proposed throughout the site and along the perimeter of the church building and the pavilion. Because the Whispering Hills Estates Planned Community Comprehensive Development Plan (COP 04-01) envisioned single family residential uses on the project site, an amendment to COP 04-01 would be required for the proposed project. This code amendment would allow the proposed church use with a Conditional Use Permit. The church use would then be reviewed based on the amended COP 04-01. The proposed project would connect to existing City infrastructure to provide water, sewer, and storm drainage utilities. A water quality basin would be located in the northern portion of the project site. Police protection service would be provided by the Orange County Sheriff's Department (OCSD). The Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) would provide fire protection service. School services would be provided by the Capistrano Unified School District (CUSD). Electricity will be provided by San Diego Gas & Electric and natural gas will be provided by The Gas Company. Findings: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the City of San Juan Capistrano has prepared an Initial Study to determine whether the proposed project may have a significant adverse effect on the environment. The Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration reflect the independent judgment of City of San Juan Capistrano staff. On the basis of the Initial Study, the City of San Juan Capistrano hereby finds: Although the proposed project could have a significant adverse effect on the environment, there will not be a significant adverse effect in this case because the project has incorporated specific provisions to reduce impacts to a less than significant level and/or the mitigation measures described herein have been added to the project. A Mitigated Negative Declaration has thus been prepared. The Initial Study, which provides the basis and reasons for this determination, is attached and/or referenced herein and is hereby made a part of this document. Signature Date Proposed Mitigation Measures: The following Mitigation Measures are extracted from the Initial Study. These measures are designed to avoid or minimize potentially significant impacts, and thereby reduce them to an insignificant level. A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) is an integral part of project implementation to ensure that mitigation is properly implemented by the City of San Juan Capistrano and the implementing agencies. The MMRP will describe actions required to implement the appropriate mitigation for each CEQA category including identifying the responsible agency, program timing, and program monitoring requirements. Based on the analysis and conclusions of the Initial Study, the impacts of proposed project would be mitigated to less-than-significant levels with the implementation of the mitigation measures presented below. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Mitigation Measure Bio-1: Prior to any permit issuance for grubbing, grading, tree trimming/removal or prior to engaging in such activities that would occur between the breeding season for native birds [February 15 through july 31 ), the project applicant shall retain the services of a qualified ornithologist to conduct an ornithological survey of the construction zone. The City will require the developer to submit a copy of the executed contract for such services prior to the issuance of any grading permits. The ornithological survey shall occur not more than seven days prior to the initiation of those grading/construction activities. If the ornithologist detects any occupied nests of native birds within the construction zone or in close proximity to, they shall be mapped on construction plans and the project applicant will fence off the area[s) supporting bird nests with temporary construction fencing, providing a minimum buffer of 200 feet between the nest and limits of construction. {This buffer zone shall be at least 500 feet for rap tors until the young have fledged, are no longer being fed by the parents, have left the nest, and will no longer be impacted by the project) The construction crew will be instructed to avoid any activities in the zone until the bird nest(s) isjare no longer occupied, per a subsequent survey by the qualified ornithologist Alternatively, the project applicant will consult as appropriate with the USFWS to discuss the potentia/loss of nests of native birds covered by the MBTA to obtain the appropriate permit from the USFWS. CULTURAL RESOURCES Mitigation Measure Cul-1: A qualified archaeologist [defined as an archaeologist on the List of Certified Archaeologists for Orange County) shall be retained by the project applicant and shall be present at pre-construction meetings to advise construction contractors about the sensitive nature of cultural resources located on andjor in the vicinity of the project site, as well as monitoring requirements. A qualified monitor (defined as an individual with a bachelors degree in anthropology with archaeological monitoring experience), supervised by the qualified archaeologist, shall observe on-and off-site construction activities that result in grading, andjor excavating on or below the original ground surface (including during project-related off-site utility [natural gas, electricity, sewer, water, drainage, communications, etc.] and roadway improvements). Should nonhuman cultural resources be discovered, the monitor shall have the power to temporarily halt or divert construction activities until the qualified archaeologist can determine if the resources are significant and, if significant, until recovered by the archaeologist. In the event that human remains are discovered, construction activities shall be halted or diverted until the provisions of §7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code and §5097.98 of the Public Resources Code have been implemented. Mitigation Measure Cul-2: During construction/grading activities, a Native American monitor shall observe construction/grading activities that result in grading, excavating, andjor trenching on or below the original ground surface (including during project-related offsite utility [e.g., natural gas, electricity, sewer, water, drainage, communications, etc.] and roadway improvements). The Native American monitor shall consult with the archaeological monitor regarding objects and remains encountered during grading that may be considered sacred or important. In the event that evidence of human remains is discovered, the Native American monitor shall verifY that the archaeologist has notified the Coroner. Mitigation Measure Cul-3: If a significant Tribal Cultural Resource andjor unique archaeological resource is inadvertently discovered during ground disturbing activities for this the project, the juanefio Band of Mission Indians Acjachemen Nation UBMIAN) respectfully request Pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 21083.2 [b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological, historical, paleontological and Tribal Cultural Resources., If however, it is demonstrated that avoidance of a significant andjor unique cultural resource is infeasible, a data recovery plan shall be prepared and submitted to the City ofSanjuan Capistrano and the ]BMIAN. Mitigation Measure Cul-4: If any prehistoric or historic artifacts, human remains or other indications of archaeological or paleontological resources are found during grading and construction activities, an archaeologist meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards in prehistoric or historical archaeology, as appropriate, shall be consulted to evaluate the finds and recommend appropriate mitigation measures. • If cultural resources are identified, every effort shall be made to avoid the resources, with preservation an important goal. If significant sites cannot feasibly be avoided, appropriate measures, such as data recovery excavations or photographic documentation of buildings, shall be undertaken consistent with applicable state and federal regulations. If the find is determined to be be a tribal cultural resource and the discovered archaeological resource cannot be avoided, then applicable mitigation measures for the resource shall be discussed with the geographically affiliated tribe. Applicable mitigation measures that also take into account the cultural values and meaning of the discovered tribal cultural resource, including confidentiality if requested by the tribe, shall be completed {e.g., preservation in place, data recovery program pursuant to PRC §21083.2[i]). During evaluation or mitigative treatment, ground disturbance and construction work could continue on other parts of the project site. • If human remains are discovered, all work shall be halted immediately within 50 meters {165 feet) of the discovery, the County Coroner must be notified, according to Section 5097.98 of the State Public Resources Code and Section 7050.5 of California's Health and Safety Code. If the remains are determined to be Native American, the coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission, and the procedures outlined in CEQA Section 15064.5{d) and {e) shall be followed. • If any fossils are encountered, there shall be no further disturbance of the area surrounding this find until the materials have been evaluated by a qualified paleontologist, and appropriate treatment measures have been identified. GEOLOGY AND SOILS Mitigation Measure Geo-1: Prior to earthmoving activities for the project, a certified geotechnical engineer, or equivalent, shall be retained to perform a final geotechnical evaluation of the soils at a design -level as required by the requirements of the California Building Code Title 24, Part 2, Chapter 18, Section 1803.1.1.2 related to expansive soils and other soil conditions. The evaluation shall be prepared in accordance with the standards and requirements outlined in California Building Code, Title 24, Part 2, Chapter 16, Chapter 17, and Chapter 18, which addresses structural design, tests and inspections, and soils and foundation standards. The final geotechnical evaluation shall include design recommendations to ensure that soil conditions do not pose a threat to the health and safety of people or structures, including threats from landslides, unstable soils, expansive soils, or post-construction settlement. The grading and improvement plans shall be designed in accordance with the recommendations provided in the final geotechnical evaluation. Mitigation Measure Geo-2: The project applicant shall submit a Notice of Intent {NO/) and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan {SWPPP) to the RWQCB in accordance with the NPDES General Construction Permit requirements. The SWPPP shall be designed to control pollutant discharges utilizing Best Management Practices {BMPs) and technology to reduce erosion and sediments. BMPs may consist of a wide variety of measures taken to reduce pollutants in stormwater runoff from the project site. Measures shall include temporary erosion control measures {such as silt fences, staked straw bales/wattles, silt/sediment basins and traps, check dams, geofabric, sandbag dikes, and temporary revegetation or other ground cover) that will be employed to control erosion from disturbed areas. Final selection of BMPs will be subject to approval by the City of San juan Capistrano and the RWQCB. The SWPPP will be kept on site during construction activity and will be made available upon request to representatives of the RWQCB and City. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Mitigation Measure Hydro-1: The storm drainage plan shall be designed and engineered to ensure that post-project runoff is equal to or less than pre-project runoff The applicant shall provide the City Engineer with all storm water runoff calculations with the improvement plan submittal. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES Implement Mitigation Measures Cul-1, -2, -3, and -4. This page left intentionally blank. CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT INITIAL STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS Initial Study Checklist .................................................................................................................................. 3 Project Title ................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Lead Agency Name and Address .......................................................................................................................... 3 Contact Person and Phone Number .................................................................................................................... 3 Project Sponsor's Name and Address ................................................................................................................. 3 Project Location and Setting .................................................................................................................................. 3 General Plan and Zoning .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Project Description .................................................................................................................................................... 4 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected .................................................................................... 19 Determination .............................................................................................................................................. 19 Evaluation Instructions ............................................................................................................................ 20 Environmental Checklist .......................................................................................................................... 22 I. AESTHETICS ....................................................................................................................................................... 22 II. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES ........................................................................................... 33 Ill. AIR QUALITY ....................................................................................................................................................... 37 IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ............................................................................................................... , ............. 43 V. CULTURAL RESOURCES ................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS ...................................................................................................................................... 52 XII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS .................................................................................................................. 63 VIII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ............................................................................................ 68 IX HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY ....................................................................................................... 71 X. LAND USE AND PLANNING ......................................................................................................................... 79 XI. MINERAL RESOURCES ................................................................................................................................... 80 XII. NOJSE ..................................................................................................................................................................... 81 XIII. POPULATION AND HOUSING ...................................................................................................................... 95 XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES ............................................................................................................................................. 96 XV. RECREATION ................................................................................................................................................... 100 XVI. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ........................................................................................................ 101 XVII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES ............................................................................................................ 117 XVIII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS ...................................................................................................... 119 XV/X MANDATORY FINDINGS OF S/GNTFICANCE ..................................................................................... 124 References ................................................................................................................................................... 126 PAGEl JNmALS'Fu.DY CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT This page left intentionally blank. L PAGBII CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT lNJTW.S'nJDY INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST PROJECT TITLE Church of Jesus Christ ofLatter Day Saints Meetinghouse Project LEAD AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS City of San Juan Capistrano Development Services Department 32400 Paseo Adelanto San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 CONTACT PERSON AND PHONE NUMBER David Contreras, Senior Planner City of San Juan Capistrano Development Services Department 32400 Paseo Adelanto San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 dcontreras@sanjuancapistrano.org (949) 443-6320 PROJECT SPONSOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church Scott C. Smith 18101 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 1000 Irvine, CA 92612 PROJECT LOCATION AND SETTING The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Meetinghouse Project site (project site) is located on the north side of Stallion Ridge (formerly Vista Montana), northwest of the Avenida La Pata and Stallion Ridge intersection in San Juan Capistrano, California (Figure 1 and 2). The project site totals approximately 4.54 acres and is currently undeveloped. While the project site is undeveloped, the site has been mass graded in conjunction with the overall grading associated with the adjacent high school and the Whispering Hills Estate subdivision. The Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) for the project site is 664-251-31. The site is located at an elevation of approximately 414 to 428 feet above mean sea level (MSL), with slopes increasing from north to south. The site is accessed via Stallion Ridge and via an existing private driveway located between the site and San Juan Hills High School (Figure 3). The property abuts public- owned and dedicated open space to the north. GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING The project site has a Planned Community (PC) General Plan Land Use Designation (Figure 4) and Planned Community (PC-COP 04-01) Zoning Designation (Figure 5). CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project includes development of a 16,558-square-foot Meetinghouse/Cultural Hall building and chapel with 292 fixed seats and pews on the 4.54-acre site. The maximum occupancy of the proposed Meetinghouse/Cultural Hall building and chapel is estimated to be 1,151 persons. The building includes a multi-purpose room which is intended t o b e use d fo r basketball, volleyball, and dining purposes. The remainder of the proposed Meetinghouse/Cultural Hall building consists of offices, classrooms, and support uses. The project also includes a storage shed, an outdoor 1,990-square-foot pavilion, and a trash enclosure. The proposed pavilion would be used for congregational picnics with under 75 adults and children, and smaller youth gatherings such as Cub Scout Troop activities, or other similar teen discussions. The aforementioned congregational picnics and other youth activities would occur on a few occasions during the year, usually on Tuesday or Wednesday evenings. Events for elementary school aged children would occur between 4:00 PM and 6:30 PM, and events for youth and/or adults would occur between 7:00 PM and 8:30 PM. The outdoor pavilion area is not anticipated to host concerts or other similar events which would attract large crowds or would require amplified music. The congregation activities with 75 or fewer attendees would occur once or twice a year on a Saturday afternoon. The proposed parking area would include 229 parking spaces. Access to the project site would be provided from Stallion Ridge (formerly Vista Montana) and from the San Juan Hills High School private access road. The proposed church building has a "Tuscan Revival" architectural style. This architectural style is one of the recommended styles in the City of San Juan Capistrano's Architectural Design Guidelines. The church building has a roof height of 37 -feet, 8-inches. The church building and the pavilion will include concrete Mission roof tile and will be painted with earth-tone colors; and include cultured stone. Landscaping is proposed throughout the site and along the perimeter of the church building and the pavilion. Because the Whispering Hills Estates Planned Community Comprehensive Development Plan (COP 04-01) envisioned single family residential uses on the project site, an amendment to COP 04-01 would be required for the proposed project. This code amendment would allow the proposed church use with a Conditional Use Permit. The church use would then be reviewed based on the amended COP 04-01. The proposed project would connect to existing City infrastructure to provide water, sewer, and storm drainage utilities. A water quality basin would be located in the northern portion of the project site. Police protection service would be provided by the Orange County Sheriffs Department (OCSD). The Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) would provide fire protection service. School services would be provided by the Capistrano Unified School District (CUSD). Electricity will be provided by San Diego Gas & Electric and natural gas will be provided by The Gas Company. The project plans, including architectural renderings, occupancy plan, site plan, main floor plan, elevations, architectural details, conceptual grading plan, storm drain plan, conceptual utility plan, preliminary planting plan, and preliminary irrigation plan, are included in Appendix A. REQUESTED ENTITLEMENTS AND OTHER APPROVALS The City of San Juan Capistrano is the Lead Agency for the proposed project, pursuant to the State Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA, Section 15050. L PAGE4 CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT INlTI~L_STimY This document will be used by the City of San Juan Capistrano to take the following actions: • Code Amendment (CA): The amendment to the regulating Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP 04-01) to allow the church use with a Conditional Use Permit (CUP); • Architectural Control (AC): The review of the site plan, architectural design of the structures, lighting, site amenities and landscape; • Conditional Use Permit (CUP): The review of the church use within the regulating Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP 04-01); and • Grading Plan Modification (GPM): The review of proposed onsite grading and elevations to create a building pad and parking Jot. The following agencies may be required to issue permits or approve certain aspects of the proposed project: • Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) -Construction activities would be required to be covered under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES); • RWQCB -Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) approval would be required prior to construction activities pursuant to the Clean Water Act. PAGE'S ] CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LA TIER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT This page left intentionally blank. L PAGE6 C' 0 N l_.o,,'A lliJf!lt-. [";:~;:;::;;;:~~~-·,.. t 0 I \. i"" /)fkO Miles 1:1,000.000 10 ® ( 79 RIVERSIDE e OUti .~ .... , (1(7" !"tlllft!til..-&.·.-. I 67 RaJtjtn•a I CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT IS/MND Figure 1: Regional Location Map ••• JNl1!1ALSTUDY CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT This page left intentionally blank. L PA_GB_B _ ____. Legend c:J Project Boundary ~-=-~--J San Juan Capistrano C~J San Clemente ~-=-~~J Unincorporated Orange County Sour( u (}JI!ii_>'-i' ((,lull.\ II 01 fr /n,'0'2Pi~' 1/(i;J )n-, It r N i 500 1 000 I I Feel 1:2-4 000 SanJuan Capistrano Collection Center CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT IS/MND Figure 2 . Project Vicinity Map ••• JNITIAil 'SrtJby CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LA TIER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT This page left intentionally blank. L PAGE10 Legend Project Boundary .Wu•'rf'J Oltllt~· ((l~r rJf• lfrLI!! (l"'lrnt Uo1Jif I«~H f';l •i•''P V..lftC' ,\fn,,dmr, ~/uL 1\ :ru"' N t 0 100 200 Feel 1 6,000 CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT IS/MND Figure 3. Aerial View of Project Site ... rl•~•••r ....... 1, •••• CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT This page left intentionally blank. L PAGB 12 ~ z 0 )> Project Boundary City of San Juan Capistrano General Plan Designations Very Low Density Low Density Medium Low Density Planned Community Community Park General Open Space Open Space Recreation Regional Park -Natural Open Space Orange County General Plan Designations Landfill Site Open Space -1 oo eoo Feet 1 16,000 CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT IS/MND Figure 4. Existing General Plan Land Use Map 11 r loa..,.,. • ••• 1NmAL5'MJI)Y CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT This page left intentionally blank. L PAGB14 CJ Project Boundary San Juan Capistrano Zoning Designations RA OS R CP RS-7,00 0 RS-10,000 RSE-20,000 RSE-40,000 GOS NOS SWF PC A 1-G en eral Ag ric ul tu re "Vh PC-Piann ed Co mmu nity ~tlll'n Om11~ <mmt• Sof'llitro C.qJt)'lhlN .OIIIJr'PfJ\1~~ , • ..,,.t"" ~tr ,/5 ()1l/l1'"" llorhf {111 1'•'' \/11~ ...... rt.:f t/~1· t/cllr l/u• r~ .,,,; 400 800 Feel 1 16 000 CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT ISIMND Figure 5. Existing Zoning Map •t 1 •• Uf• •••• fNI11ALSTUDY CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT This page left intentionally blank. L PAGB16 "'!"'f"C'~ --- 0 "---........_ ..,. . .,....,.. ....... ~ -~. -.. ~ •, ·, "" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'fl """""'-. .,.. .,.. ,I ---· ____ 9_ _______ l / __________________________ L_~":=::~=-~~--------------------1 1 .;; I I -_.,., I ~ •• I 9 I ~ CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTERDAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT IS/MND Figure 6 . Site Plan 1 ~ ,. ' '' ~ .. I' 1 -l •• II j ll ~ '·I 4<o \1 J• ••• '·'"'''''" i'l '"'"''!'l''":'"·······'"''"'""''"''''"'" INITIALSTtroY CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT This page left intentionally blank. c=6GE1c8 CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT (NJTIALSTlJDY ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED None of the environmental factors listed below would be potentially affected by this project, as described on the following pages. Aesthetics Agriculture and Forest Air Quality Resources Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology and Soils Greenhouse Gasses Hazards and Hazardous Hydrology and Water Materials Quality Land Use and Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population and Housing Public Services Recreation Transportation and Tribal Cultural Utilities and Service Traffic Resources Systems Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed proj e ct could have a significant effect on the environment, there X will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agre ed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that th e proposed project MAY have a significant effect on th e environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY h a ve a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has bee n adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Signature Date PAGB19 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT EVALUATION INSTRUCTIONS 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answ e r s that a r e adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). L PAGH20 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significant. EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In each area of potential impact listed in this section, there are one or more questions which assess the degree of potential environmental effect. A response is provided to each question using one of the four impact evaluation criteria described below. A discussion of the response is also included. • Potentially Significant Impact. This response is appropriate when there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries, upon completion of the Initial Study, an EIR is required. • Less than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. This response applies when the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact". The Lead Agency must describe the mitigation measures and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. • Less than Significant Impact. A less than significant impact is one which is deemed to have little or no adverse effect on the environment. Mitigation measures are, therefore, not necessary, although they may be recommended to further reduce a minor impact. • No Impact. These issues were either identified as having no impact on the environment, or they are not relevant to the Project. [ PAijE21 INITIAL STUDY CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST This section of the Initial Study incorporates the most current Appendix "G" Environmental Checklist Form, contained in the CEQA Guidelines. Impact questions and responses are included in both tabular and narrative formats for each of the 19 environmental topic areas. I. AESTHETICS Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant with Would the project: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporation Impact a) Have a substant ial ad vers e effec t on a sc eni c X vist a? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock X outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its X surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or X nighttime views in the area? Responses to Checklist Questions Responses a), c): The City of San Juan Capistrano adopted Architectural Design Guidelines in 1991. The design guidelines are intended to implement the General Plan goals and policies in order to promote high quality development for the preservation and enhancement of the character of the City. The City uses the Design Guidelines during the development review process to ensure that the " ... highest level of design quality and creativity" are achieved in each project proposed in San Juan Capistrano . The Design Guidelines supplement the San Juan Capistrano Municipal Code (Zoning) to ensure that the City's urban design goals are achieved. A scenic vista is generally considered to be a location from which the public can experience unique and exemplary high-quality views-often from elevated vantage points that offer panoramic views of great breadth and depth. Examples would be views from mountain ranges, valleys, ridgelin e s, or water bodies, although other viewpoints with exceptionally high visual quality may be defined as a scenic vista. The City has not designated any area within the city limits as a scenic vista, however, the City's Community Design Element of the General Plan identifies major travelways, including both vehicular and rail, as " ... providing the public with a visual image of the quality of life envisioned by the community." As indicated in the Community Design Element, scenic corridors include designated arterials contained in the Circulation Element and the railroad corridor that passes through the City. In the vicinity of the project site, only La Pata Avenue is designated as a scenic corridor. Three visual simulations were prepared from public vantage points to evaluate the potential visual and aesthetic impacts anticipated to result from the implementation of the proposed project. The vantage points were selected because they represent locations from which important public views to the site exist, including view corridors along arterial roadways and PAGE22 CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT INITIAL STUDY locations having public access. Vantage points are selected to be representative of a general area/location, but it is not intended to represent every conceivable visual vantage point of the project. The selected view simulations, taken in their entirety, provide a representative overview of the potential view impacts that can be anticipated by the project. Table 1 identifies and describes the locations from which the photographs were taken and visual simulations created. Each of the three view locations and the respective view orientation are illustrated in Figures 7, 8, and 9. Table 1: Key View Points for Visual Simulations View# (Figure) View Location View Orientation 1 (Figure 7) Stallion Ridge (Vista Montana) Northeast 2 (Figure 8) Via Granada I Stallion Ridge (Vista Montana) intersection Northwest 3 [Figure 9) Stallion Ridge (Vista Montana) Northwest SOURCE: MAXEY GROUP -INTERNATIONAL URBAN DESIGN CONSULTANCY. For analysis purposes, a scenic vista can be discussed in terms of a foreground, middle ground, and background viewshed. The middle ground and background viewshed is often referred to as the broad viewshed. Scenic vistas include a focal point of the forefront of the broad viewshed, such as visually important trees, rocks, or historic buildings. An impact would generally occur if a project would change the view to the middle ground or background elements of the broad viewshed, or remove the visually important trees, rocks, or historic buildings in the foreground. Figure 7 shows views of the project site from the south of the project site, looking northeast down Stallion Ridge into the project site. The two images shown in Figure 7 depict the existing site conditions, as well as a photo simulation of post-development site conditions. Figure 8 shows views of the project site from the intersection of Via Granada and Stallion Ridge, looking northwest down Stallion Ridge into the project site. The two images shown in Figure 8 depict the existing site conditions, as well as a photo simulation of post-development site conditions. Figure 9 shows views of the project site from the south of the project site, looking northwest down Stallion Ridge into the project site. The two images shown in Figure 9 depict the existing site conditions, as well as a photo simulation of post-development site conditions. As illustrated in the visual simulations, development of the project site would introduce a public church structure onto a site that is currently undeveloped and visually perceived as open space. Although surrounded by existing urban development, such as roads, a school, and residential uses, development of the proposed project would convert a currently vacant parcel into developed uses. As shown in the visual simulations, the proposed project will not significantly disrupt middle ground or background views from public viewpoints. The proposed project would result in changes to the foreground views from the public viewpoint by adding a church structure to a site that is undeveloped. Although the visual character of the project site would be significantly altered as a result of project implementation, the guidelines and standards within the Whispering Hills Estate Planned Community would ensure consistent development that is in line with the City's vision for the area. The design features of the proposed project are meant to be consistent with, and complimentary to, the surrounding existing development. Views of the project site would be visually filtered from the roadway with proposed landscaping. The intent of the landscaping is to help subordinate the urbanized image of development through screening, which would lessen the scale and presence of the development to the extent feasible. PAG623 CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT Given the topography of the project site and the elevated roadway to the east, views of the project site are limited from surrounding lands. Views are most prominent from the adjacent Stallion Ridge roadway. Figures 7 through 9 shows that while development of the site would be highly visible to motorists travelling on adjacent roadways, the visual character of the project site would be consistent with the goals established by the General Plan and City Development Code, and would be compatible and complimentary to existing development in the vicinity of the site. Conclusion Upon build-out, the project would be of similar visual character to adjacent existing and future developments. For motorists travelling along nearby roadways, such as Stallion Ridge or La Pata Avenue, the project would appear to be a continuation of adjacent land uses and would not present unexpected or otherwise unpleasant aesthetic values within the general project vicinity. The greatest visual change would apply to neighbors that abut the project site with a direct view of the area. Generally, views of the project site are not visible from many nearby residences du e to th e existing buildings, fencing/walls, mature trees, and vegetation that obscure views. Most neighbors would see the visual change while traveling along the public roadways that front the project site. The change in character of the project site, once developed, is anticipated by the General Plan and would be visually compatible with surrounding existing residential neighborhoods to the north, south, east, and west. Implementation of the design guidelines and standards in the Comprehensive Development Plan would ensure that impacts to visual resources would be minimized to the extent feasible. The project would not substantially degrade a scenic vista, or the existing visual character/quality of the site and its surroundings, and this impact would be less than significant. Response b): The project site is not located within view of a state scenic highway. The nearest highway subject to this program is State Route (SR) 74, an Eligible Designated State Scenic Highways, located approximately 1.2 miles north of the project site. Trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings are not located on the project site. The proposed project would not substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway. Implementation of the proposed project would have no impact relative to this topic. Response d): Existing development and streets to the north, south, east, and west currently produce a moderate amount of nighttime lighting from street lighting, residential interiors, and exterior building lighting. The school facility also provides facility lighting for parking, buildings, and stadium lighting. The project site is currently undeveloped and does not contain existing lighting or glare. Light sources from the proposed project would be consistent with the type and intensity of existing parking and building lighting sources at the adjacent school facility. When viewed from more distant areas, the lighting associated with the proposed development would slightly increase because the existing project site is currently dark. The use of specific building materials approved through the design review process would ensure that there are not extensive reflective building materials that would cause glare. The General Plan Community Design Element addresses exterior lighting. As suggested in that element, exterior lighting levels should be the minimum necessary to protect the public safety. Specifically, lighting in the community must be designed to achieve the following criteria: L PAGE24 CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT JNmALSnJDY • Within residential neighborhoods in hillside areas, street lights should be minimized and located at street intersections, curves in streets and at the end of cui-de-sacs. • Within non-residential areas, both pedestrian and parking lot lighting should be set at minimum levels recommended by the illuminating Engineering Society for public safety. • Recreation lighting should require special studies and analysis to minimize light intrusion into adjacent neighborhoods. The Whispering Hills Estates CDP does not include lighting standards; however, the proposed project will be required to comply with the City's existing regulations and conditions to ensure that potential light and glare is minimized within the area. These include: compliance with the City's Architectural Design Guidelines and the Whispering Hills Estates CDP through the City's design review process; compliance with Section 9-3.529 of the Municipal Code, which pertains to street, signage, landscape, and parking lot lighting sources; and compliance with Section 9.3- 529 of the Municipal Code, which pertains to lighting and photometric plan(s). The lighting proposed for the project should complement the architectural style of the buildings and retain a pedestrian scale while providing illumination of the building facade and entrances and to enhance the desired atmosphere of the Whispering Hills Estates Planned Community. To achieve those goals, the project would be required to include the following : • Parking areas shall have lighting capable of providing adequate illumination for security and safety. Lighting standards shall be energy-efficient and in scale with the height and use of the on-site structures. • All illumination, including security lighting, shall be directed downward, away from adjacent properties and public rights-of-way preventing spillover onto adjoining properties, streets, or skyward. • Lighting systems should be designed for normal levels during operating hours and reduced intensity levels throughout late, non-operational hours (for security purposes. • Any new street lighting shall match the existing fixtures within the Whispering Hills Planned Community. Although lighting for the exterior parking and related exterior lighting will provide for maximum permitted illumination within the project site for parking areas and walkways, buildings, signage, etc., the proposed lighting must comply with Section 9.3-529 of the City's Municipal Code. Lighting for the project must also be designed to meet the objectives in the Community Design Element, including the preparation of a photometric plan, which will be prepared and submitted to the City that demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director or a designee that illumination does not create off-site light and glare. As a result, the introduction of exterior lighting would comply with the City's lighting requirements and would not result in potentially significant adverse impacts. Therefore, impacts associated with the creation of light or glare, such that it adversely affects daytime or nighttime views in the area, would be less than significant. PAGE25 INITIAL STUDY CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT This page left intentionally blank. PAGE26 j lJit&fYlU • • • • l "-, i 3: 0 - cu u ~ > "' t < c::: ~ 0 ~ c ·.;:: ~ g ~ 0 "' fi ~ 3 E " f Vi > ~ ~ ~ 0 > ~ z ' ~ "' '0 ~ .:.\ => ~ ::> "" , , 0 "" > ~~ u:: "' ]NI'riALS'nJDY CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT This page left intentionally blank. [ PAGB28 i i Ol~'o't ll • • • • ....... 3: (1.) > c ._§ ~ r:£ "' ~ g :::::J ~ ::~ E \0 ·o:: .. ~ ~ .. "' ~ g- ~~ > ' 0 z " "' > ~ "' :::::J 'E => "" = "' > "' " ~ ;:;::: u:: 0 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT This page left intentionally blank. L PAGB30 """ 3:: <1J > c::: 0 ..... "" ::; E v:; "" "' ::I ~ "' "' > u: ~ c f! g ~2 ;~ ~"' ~-;;; 1 '0 ., -;;; a u: • • • • CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT This page left intentionally blank. CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT INITIAL STuDY II. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant with No Would the project: Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Impact Incorooration Impact a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps pre pared pursuant to the X Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of th e California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with ex isting zoning for agricultural us e, X or a Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with ex isting zoning for, or cause rezoning of, fore st land (as defined in Public X Resources Code section 1222(g)) or timberland (as defined in Publi c Resources Code section 4526)? d) Result in the loss of for est land or conversion of X forest land to non-forest use? e) Involve oth er changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-X agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non- forest use? Responses to Checklist Questions Response a): As shown in Figure 10, the project site does not contain prime farmland, unique farmland, or farmland of statewide importance as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency. The proposed project would not result in the conversion of undeveloped land to non-agricultural use. Implementation of the proposed project would have no impact relative to this issue. Response b): The project site is not zoned for agricultural use nor is it under a Williamson Act contract. The proposed project would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract. Implementation of the proposed project would have no impact relative to this issue. Response c): The Project site is not forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 1222(g)) or timberland (as defined in Public Resources Code section 4526). The proposed project would not conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land or timberland. Implementation of the proposed project would have no impact relative to this issue. Response d): The project site is not forest land. The proposed project would not result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Implementation of the proposed project would have no impact relative to this issue. Response e): The project site does not contain agricultural land or forest land. The proposed project does not involve changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non -agricultural use, or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Implementation of the proposed project would have no impact relative to this issue. PAGH33 J INITIALSTUDY CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT This page left intentionally blank. [ PAG_H_34 _ __,~ Legend c:J Project Boundary Grazing Land Other Land Urban and Built-Up Land ·''!..WI ,.tl ~~ /J.. • paseo Palmar N 250 50 0 I I I Feel 1 12,000 CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT IS/MND Figure 10. Important Farmlands Map CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT This page left intentionally blank. ~G~36 CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT INITIAL STUDY III. AIR QUALITY Potenttall.v IJess Tiran Less Than Would t he project: Slgn(JJcont Significant with Slgni/(110,11L No Impact Mitigation Impact lm/IOCt IIICO/;JJOI"OtlOtl a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the X applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality X violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality X standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial X pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial X number of people? Existing Setting The project site is located within the boundaries of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). This agency is responsible for monitoring air pollution levels and ensuring compliance with federal and state air quality regulations within the South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB) and has jurisdiction over most air quality matters within its borders. Responses to Checklist Questions Responses a-c): Air quality emissions would be generated during construction of the proposed project and during operation of the proposed project. Construction-related air quality impacts and operational air quality impacts are addressed separately below. Construction-Related Emissions Cons t ru ction Activit ie s /Sche dule : Construction activities will consist of multiple activities over several months. These construction activities can be described as site improvements (grading, underground infrastructure, and topside improvements) and vertical construction (building construction and architectural coatings). For purposes of this analysis, it is assumed that the entire project is built-out from October 2017 to November 2018. The assumptions made for the air quality and greenhouse gas emissions analysis are included as Appendix B. Site Improvements : For purposes of this analysis it is assumed that site improvements are installed in one phase. The site improvement phase of construction will begin with site preparation. Site preparation will include the use of scrapers and loaders to strip (clear and grub) all organic materials and the upper half-inch to inch of soil from the project site. This task will generally take approximately five days to complete and will include vehicle trips from construction workers. [ PAGE37 ] INITIAllSruDY CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROjECT After the site is stripped of organic materials grading will begin. This activity will involve the use of excavators, graders, dozers, loaders, and backhoes to move soil around the project site to create specific engineered grade elevations and soil compaction levels. After grading and compaction all underground infrastructure would be installed. This includes the excavation of trenches to install storm water, wastewater, potable water, and dry utilities, and then backfilling and compacting the soil over the infrastructure. Grading and infrastructure for the project site would take approximately 14 days and will include vehicle trips from construction workers. (Note: It would be possible to grade the site under a more compacted schedule with extra equipment operating or under a longer time frame with less equipment.). The last task is to install the topside improvements, which includes pouring concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and access aprons and then paving of all streets and parking lots. This task will involve the use of pavers, paving equipment, and rollers and will take approximately three days and will include vehicle trips from construction workers. (Note: It would be possible to install the topside improvements under a more compacted schedule with extra equipment operating or under a longer timeframe with less equipment). Building Construction/Architectural Coatings: Building construction involves the vertical construction of structures and landscaping around the structures. This task will involve the use of cranes, forklifts, generator sets, cement and mortar mixers, and small tractors/loaders/backhoes. For purposes of this analysis it is assumed that the entire project is constructed in approximately 270 days (12.5 months). Architectural coatings involve the interior and exterior painting associated with the structures. This task will generally be completed within five days once the two proposed structures are completed. Construction Emission s: A quantification of the emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), coarse particulate matter (PM1o), and fine particulate matter (PMz .s ) that will be emitted by project construction has been performed. CalEEMod™ (v. 2016.3.1) was used to estimate construction emissions for the proposed project. Below is a list of model assumptions used in the construction screens of CalEEMod. Table 2 presents the estimated construction phase schedule, which shows the duration of each construction phase. Table 3 shows the off- road construction equipment used during construction for each phase. Following these tables are a list of default factors that were used in the model. Model Assumptions (Construction) Table 2· Construction Phase Phase# Phase Name 1 Site Preparation 2 Grading 3 Building Construction 4 Paving 5 Architectural Coating SOURCE: CALEEMOD (V.2016.3.1} L PMJ538 J Start Date End Date #Days/Week #Days 10/2/17 10/6/17 5 5 10/6/17 10/25/17 5 14 10/25/17 11/6/18 5 270 11/5/18 11/7/18 5 3 11/6/18 11/12/18 5 5 CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT )NlTIALSnJDY Table 3: Off-Road Equipment Equipment Type Unit Amount Hours/Day Horsepower Load Factor SITE PREPARATION Scrapers 1 6.00 367 0.48 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 GRADING Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38 Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 BUILDING CONSTRUCTION Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29 Forklifts 1 8.00 89 0.20 Generator Sets 2 8.00 84 0.74 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Cement and Mortar Mixer 1 7.00 9 0.56 PAVING Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42 Paving Equipment 1 6.00 132 0.36 Rollers 1 6.00 80 0.38 ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 SOURCE: CALEEMOD (v.2016.3.1} Table 4 shows the construction emissions for the construction years 2017 and 2018. Table 4: Construction Emissions (Unmiti 1ated) Thresholds NOx s 100 lbsjday 2017 82.7591 2018 33.2005 Maximum 82.7591 Threshold Exceeded No in any Year? NOTES: LBS/DAY =POUNDS PER DAY. SOURCE: CALEEMOD (v.2016.3.1} co s 550 lbsjday 36.6616 27.3143 36.6616 No PMz.s PM1o s 55lbsjday s 150 lbsjday 17.0673 29.5629 2.1205 1.9633 17.0673 29.5629 No No The SCAQMD has established construction related emiSSions thresholds of significance as follows: 100 pounds per day (lbsjday) of NO x, 550 lbsjday of CO, 55 lbs/day of PMz.s, and 150 lbsjday of PMto· If the proposed project's emissions will exceed the SCAQMD's threshold of significance for construction-generated emissions, the proposed project will have a significant impact on air quality and all feasible mitigation are required to be implemented to reduce emissions. As shown in Table 4 above, annual construction emissions of NOx, CO, PM2.s, and PM to will not exceed the SCAQMD thresholds of significance in any given year. The project will be subject to SCAQMD Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust) during construction. SCAQMD Rule 403 does not require a permit for construction activities, but rather, sets forth general and specific requirements for all construction sites (as well as other fugitive dust sources) in the SoCAB. The general requirement prohibits a person from causing or allowing emissions of fugitive dust from construction (or other fugitive dust source) such that the presence of such PAGR39 INITIAL STuDY CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT dust remains visible in the atmosphere beyond the property line of the emissions source. SCAQMD Rule 403 also prohibits a construction site from causing an incremental PMto concentration impact at the property line of more than SO micrograms per cubic meter as determined through PMto high-volume sampling, but the concentration standard and associated PM10 sampling do not apply if specific measures identified in the rule are implemented and appropriately documented. In accordance with Rule 403, the SCAQMD requires that contractors implement Best Available Control Technology (BACT) for construction activities. Rule 403 identifies two sets of specific measures, one for all projects and another set of conditions for projects that exceed SO acres. The proposed project will be required to implement Rule 403 during construction activities to ensure particulates are minimized. Because construction of the proposed project would not exceed SCAQMD's air quality significance thresholds for construction emissions, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact related to construction emissions. Operational Emissions The SCAQMD is tasked with implementing programs and regulations r equir ed by the Feder al Clean Air Act and the California Clean Air Act. In that capacity, the SCAQMD has prepared plans to attain Federal and State ambient air quality standards. To achieve attainment with the standards, the SCAQMD has established thresholds of significance for criteria pollutant e m ission s in their SCAQMD Air Qu ality Sign ifica nce Th res hol ds (20 1 5) doc umen t. Pro jects wi th emissions below the thresholds of significance for criteria pollutants would be determine d to "Not conflict or obstruct implementation of the District's air quality plan". The proposed project would be a direct and indirect source of air pollution, in that it would generate and attract vehicle trips in the region (mobile source emissions) and it would increase area source emissions and energy consumption. The mobile source emissions would be entirely from vehicles, while the area source emissions would be primarily from the use of natural gas fuel combustion, landscape fuel combustion, consumer products, and architectural coatings. CalEEMod™ (v .2016.3.1) was used to estimate emissions for buildout of the proposed project. Table S shows the emissions, which include mobile, area source, and energy emissions of criteria pollutants that would result from operations of the proposed project. Table 5: Operational Buildout Generated Emissions (Unmit(qa t ed) NOx Thresholds Category 55/bsjday Area 2.0000e-OOS Energy 0.0933 Mobile 5.5002 Total 5.5935 Threshold No Exceeded? NOTES : UM =UNMITIGATED, M =MITIGATED. SOURCE : CALEEMOD (V.2016.3.1). co PMz .s 5501bsjday 551bsjday 1. 71 OOe-003 l.OOOOe-005 0.0783 7.0900e-003 13.0595 0.7789 13.1395 0.7860 No No PM1o 150/bsjday l.OOOOe-005 7.0999e-003 2.7964 2.8035 No The long-term operational emissions estimate for buildout of the proposed project, incorporates the potential area source and vehicle emissions, and emissions associated with utility and water usage, and wastewater and solid waste generation. L PAC _E 4_0 _ _, CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT (NITIALS'roDY The SCAQMD has established their thresholds of significance by which the project emissions are compared against to determine the level of significance. The SCAQMD has established operations related emissions thresholds of significance as follows: 55 lbs/day of NOx, 550 lbsjday of CO, 55 lbsjday of PMz.s, and 150 lbs/day of PM1o. If the proposed project's emissions will exceed the SCAQMD's threshold of significance for operational-generated emissions, the proposed project will have a significant impact on air quality and all feasible mitigation are required to be implemented to reduce emissions to the extent feasible. As shown in Table 5 above, annual emissions of NOx, CO, PMz.s, and PM10 would not exceed the SCAQMD thresholds of significance. Because the annual emissions of NOx, CO, PMz .s, and PM1o would not exceed the SCAQMD thresholds of significance, operation of the proposed project would have a less than significant impact relative to operational air emissions. Response d): Sensitive receptors are those parts of the population that can be severely impacted by air pollution. Sensitive receptors include children, the elderly, and the infirm. The residents located to the south of the project site are considered sensitive receptors. As described below, the operations of the proposed project would not contribute substantial concentrations of pollutants to sensitive receptors. The construction phase of the proposed project has the potential to increase pollution concentrations that would impact sensitive receptors. Construction-Related Impacts on Sensitive Receptors: The construction phase of the project would be temporary and short-term, and compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 would greatly reduce pollution concentrations generated during construction activities. Operation of the proposed project would result in emissions primarily from vehicle trips, area sources, and energy sources. As described under Response a) -c) above, the proposed project would not generate significant concentrations of air emissions. Impacts to sensitive receptors during construction would be negligible and this is a less than significant impact. Toxic Air Contaminant Impacts on Sensitive Receptors: A toxic air contaminant (TAC) is defined as an air pollutant that may cause or contribute to an increase in mortality or in serious illness, or that may pose a hazard to human health. T ACs are usually present in minute quantities in the ambient air. However, their high toxicity or health risk may pose a threat to public health even at very low concentrations. In general, for those TACs that may cause cancer, there is no concentration that does not present some risk. This contrasts with the criteria pollutants for which acceptable levels of exposure can be determined and for which the state and federal governments have set ambient air quality standards. The California Air Resources Board (CARB) published the Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective (2007) to provide information to local planners and decision- makers about land use compatibility issues associated with emissions from industrial, commercial and mobile sources of air pollution. The CARB Handbook indicates that mobile sources continue to be the largest overall contributors to the State's air pollution problems, representing the greatest air pollution health risk to most Californians. The most serious pollutants on a statewide basis include diesel exhaust particulate matter (diesel PM), benzene, and 1,3-butadiene, all of which are emitted by motor vehicles. These mobile source air taxies are largely associated with freeways and high traffic roads. Non-mobile source air taxies are largely associated with industrial and commercial uses. Table 6 provides the CARB minimum separation recommendations on siting sensitive land uses. PAGI!41 ] INITIALS'fUDY CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROjECT 'l bl 6 CA M" . a e : RB 1mmum s eparation R ecommen d . atwnson s· · s 1ting enszt1ve L dU an ses Source Category Advisory Recommendations Freeways and • Avoid siting new sensitive land uses within 500 feet of a fre eway, urban roads with High-Traffic Roads 100,000 vehicles/day, or rural roads with 50,000 vehicles/day.1 • Avoid siting new sensitive land uses within 1,000 feet of a distribution center (that accommodates more than 100 trucks per day, more than 40 trucks with operating Distribution transport refrigeration units (TRUs) per day, or where TRU unit operations exceed 3 00 Centers hours per week). • Take into account the configuration of existing distribution centers and avoid locating residences and other new sensitive land uses near entry and exit points. • Avoid siting new sensitive land uses within 1,000 feet of a major service and Rail Yards maintenance rail yard. • Within one mile of a rail yard, consider possible siting limitations and mitigation approaches. • Avoid siting of new sensitive land uses immediately downwind of ports in th e most Ports heavily impacted zones. Consult local air districts or the CARBon the status of pending analyses of health risks. • Avoid siting new sensitive land uses immediately downwind of petr oleum refiner ies. Refineries Consult with local air districts and other local agencies to dete rmine an appropriate separation. Chrome Platers • Avoid siting new sensitive land uses within 1,000 feet of a chrome plater. • Avoid siting new sensitive land uses within 3 00 feet of any dry-cleaning operation. For Dry Cleaners Using operations with two or more machines, provide 500 feet. For operations with 3 or more Perchloro-machines, consult with the local air district. ethylene • Do not site new sensitive land uses in the same building with perc dry cleaning operations. Gasoline • Avoid siting new sensitive land uses within 300 feet of a large gas station (defined as a Dispensing facility with a throughput of 3.6 million gallons per year or greater). A 50-foot Facilities separation is recommended for typical gas dispensing facilities. SOURCE: AIR QUALITY AND LAND USE HANDBOOK: A COMMUNITY HEALTH PERSPEa/VE" (CARB 2 005}. The proposed project does not include any source categories. Additionally, there are no source categories listed above that are within screening distances or minimum separation distances suggested for sensitive uses. SR 7 4 is the closest freeway and is located approximately 1.2 miles (6,332 feet) from the project site. The project is consistent with the CARE Minimum Separation Recommendations on Siting Sensitive Land Uses (2005). A health risk assessment is not warranted for any further assessment. Implementation of the proposed project would not result in an increased exposure of sensitive receptors to localized concentrations ofT ACs. This project would have a less than significant impact relative to this topic. Response e): The proposed project would not generate objectionable odors. People in the immediate vicinity of construction activities may be subject to temporary odors typically associated with construction activities (diesel exhaust, hot asphalt, etc.). However, any odors generated by construction activities would be minor and would be short and temporary in duration. Implementation of the proposed project would have a less than significant impact relative to this topic. 12GB42 CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT INITJAI.S'JIUDY IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Woulit tb ~ pr.o]ept; a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Responses to Checklist Questions Response a): Special Status Plants local, Potentially Less-1'han Less'l'l1un Significant with No Significant Mltigatron Slgnlfiaant lmpgc t lmpatft Jm;o pporatlon Impact X X X X X X A records search reveals that there are 56 special status plant species (federal/state listed, and/or CNPS List 1B or 2) documented within the 9-quadrangle region search of the project site. The records search was generated from the CNDDB, USFWS IPAC report, and CNPS inventory (2 0 17). The full records are contained in Appendix C. Field surveys were performed on March 30th and July 1Qth, 2017, which was intended to capture the flowering season for special status plants documented within the region. At the time of the surveys, the project site supported annual grassland and limited coyote brush. The annual grasslands dominated the study area and consisted of non-native weedy grass species and invasive annual species. The annual grassland area was degraded, and in several areas the land was barren because of the site being used for parking. The coyote brush occurred on the site in patches. CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT A historical analysis of the site showed that the site has been substantially altered as a result of grading necessary to accommodate the existing San Juan Hills High School located immediate to the west of the project site. Prior to the grading activities, annual grassland and coyote brush communities occupied the site. There is a restoration area established as part of the Whispering Hills Estates development project, which is located east of the project site (east of the SDG&E easement). The project site is not located within the restoration areas. The project site was devoid of sensitive habitat and does not contain any special status plants that are documented in the region. Therefore, the proposed project would have a less than significant impacts on special-status plants. Special Status Animals A records search reveals that there are 12 special status animals species (federal/state listed) within the 9-quadrangle region search of the project site. The records search came from the CNDDB, and USFWS IPAC report (2017). The full records are contained in Appendix C. Reconnaissance-level field surveys were performed on March 30th and July 1Qth , 2017. Wildlife observations were very limited during these field surveys, which is anticipated to be a result of the grading disturbance and the current use of the site for parking. There was some evidence of ground dwelling mammals during these surveys in the areas that were not heavily used for parking. The project site was also surveyed in prior years, before the grading disturbance that occurred with the San Juan Hills High School. It is noted in those surveys that there was a variety of wildlife, including birds, amphibians, reptiles, and mammals that were observed or expected to occur on the project site. This includes: mice, rats, gophers, squirrels, rabbits, coyote, fox, skunk, raccoon, bobcat and deer. While none of these were observed during the 2017 surveys, there was evidence of burrows created by, or used by, mice, rats, gophers, and squirrels. Presence of these species would also draw predators such as coyote, fox, skunk, raccoon, and possibly bobcat. There is very limited habitat for deer under the current conditions of the project site. The field surveys, both past and present, did not identify presence of appropriate habitat for any of the special status animals that are documented in the region. The project site did not contain any trees, and no tree nesting birds were observed within proximity to the project site. The project site also did not contain any ground nesting birds, and there was no evidence of present or past ground nesting. While no nesting was observed, each nesting cycle (year) brings new potential for nesting. Any delay in construction into a future year would present a new potential for impacts to nesting birds. Implementation of the following mitigation measure would ensure that the project site is evaluated prior to the commencement of construction if it were to occur during the nesting season. Additionally, the following measure provides certain protections for nesting birds if they were found during the preconstruction survey. Given the absence of observations of, or appropriate habitat for, special status animals, and with implementation of the following measure, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact on special-status animals. Mitigation Measure Bio·l: Prior to any permit is suance for grubbing, grading, tree trimming/removal or prior to engaging in such activities that would occur between the breeding season for native birds (February 15 through july 31), the project applicant shall retain the services of a qualified ornithologist to conduct an ornithological survey of the construction zone. The City will require the developer to submit a copy of the executed contract for such services prior to the issuance of any grading permits. The ornithological survey shall occur not more than seven days prior to the initiation of those grading/construction activities. If the ornithologist detects any occup ied nests of native birds within the construction zone or in close proximity to, they shall be mapped on construction plans and the project applicant will fence of! the area(s) supporting bird nests with temporary construction fencing, providing L PAGE44 J CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT a minimum buffer of 200 feet between the nest and limits of construction. {This buffer zone shall be at least 500 feet for rap tors until the young have fledged, are no longer being fed by the parents, have left the nest, and will no longer be impacted by the project.) The construction crew will be instructed to avoid any activities in the zone until the bird nest(s) is/are no longer occupied, per a subsequent survey by the qualified ornithologist. Alternatively, the project applicant will consult as appropriate with the USFWS to discuss the potential loss of nests of native birds covered by the MBTA to obtain the appropriate permit from the USFWS. Indirect Effects on Special Status Species Construction activities have a potential to result in indirect effects either to habitat or species occupying areas outside the project site, including the Whispering Hills Estates revegetation area to the west. Indirect effects involve the potentially harmful effects associated with noise generated by construction equipment and dust created by the grading and site alteration activities. Given the distance from the project site to the revegetation area, noise and dust generated by construction activities would not result in any significant indirect effects on special status species located in the revegetation area. Construction activities would be subject to measures that are intended to minimize noise and dust impacts (i.e. construction equipment fitted with mufflers, dust control measures such as regular watering during grading). As a result, no significant indirect impacts to special status species will occur. A SWPPP will be implemented during construction to ensure that there are no indirect impacts to water bodies from storm water runoff. This would, in effect, minimize any potential indirect effect on aquatic special status species located off-site. Therefore, the proposed project would have a less than significant impacts on special-status species. Responses b-e): Riparian habitat is found in the interface between land and a river or stream. This habitat is significant in ecology, environmental management, and civil engineering because of their role in soil conservation, their habitat biodiversity, and the influence they have on fauna and aquatic ecosystems, including grassland, woodland, wetland or even non-vegetative. Sensitive natural communities are those that are considered rare in the region, support special- status plant or wildlife species, or receive regulatory protection (i.e., §404 and 401 of the Clean Water Act, the CDFG §1600 et seq. of the California Fish and Game Code, and/or the Porter- Cologne Act). In addition, the California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB) has designated a number of communities as rare; these communities are given the highest inventory priority (Holland 1986, CDFG 2003e). There were 10 communities documented within the CNDDB within a nine quad search. These included: Canyon Live Oak Ravine Forest, Southern Coast Live Oak Riparian Forest, Southern Coastal Salt Marsh, Southern Cottonwood Willow Riparian Forest, Southern Dune Scrub, Southern Foredunes, Southern Mixed Riparian Forest, Southern Riparian Scrub, Southern Sycamore Alder Riparian Woodland, and Valley Needlegrass Grassland. None of these habitat types are located within the project site. The project site does not support any riparian habitat or sensitive natural communities. Sensitive natural communities are not located on the project site. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would have a no impact relative to this issue. Response d): The project site is currently undeveloped and does not serve as a wildlife corridor, or nursery site. Although open space areas are located to the north and east of the project site, movement of wildlife through the project site is currently limited by existing development and roadways. For example, an existing school is located to the west of the project site, and residential subdivision is located to the south of the project site. The proposed project PAGE4Q INt'11ALS'llUDY CHURCH OF }ESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT would not interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. Implementation of the proposed project would result in a less than significant impact relative to this topic. Response e): The removal of native oak trees is regulated via the City's Tree Removal Permit Ordinance. Section 9-2.349 of the City's Municipal Code defines heritage tree provisions and outlines the procedures necessary to receive a tree removal permit. The project site, however, does not contain any native oak trees. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would have no impact relative to this issue. Response f): The project site is not located within an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. In July of 1996, the Orange County Central-Coastal Natural Communities Conservation Plan (NCCP) Subregional Plan was adopted. However, the City of San Juan Capistrano is not a signatory in the NCCP and the project site is not within the jurisdiction of the NCCP or any other adopted Habitat Cons ervation Plan or Natural Community Conservation Plan. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would have no impact relative to this issue. ( P:AGE46 ~ Plant (specific) ~ Plant (non-specific) D Plant (circular) -Animal (BOrn) ~ Animal (specific) ~ Animal (non-specific) D Animal (circular) ~ Terrestrial Comm. (specific) -Multiple (BOrn) rn Sensitive EO's (Commercial only) ~~~~: ;:,~~~ 1:;: 1:1 ;:::r:1~1.1~ ::;~~~~ -d,~;:~· ;:;·,j,·~:~·:: 1 ::·,~,,'11 1~/:~,1.~'//, • ' 'hr~:.::~ :::;,;~;; ,;:1 : 1 ;,, 1 1:· 1 :1 1 1 •:·:' ::: :::~·rl~;;~;;;,;·,',r;~,:: ':.~·:: : .. :;~,;::' fhl\ IIIL'tl "lilt II lifo \t /]IJI 1'1 < 11 \Ill '•• ~(',/ 11111/I!)J 1/1(/flf't (/ o;(/I.{(Jinl(l//(111 /JI 1/11 ( \'/)/)/l,lhll/1,' 1{ \flo~ I('• f•l . , . I<' I ht '''''" tl\ fl'"';f lfwr lit· 'I''' ro/ \101/!r' l[ll't I<'' •!((Ill II• <Ill 11rt rl !fa,,:mtJ! 1),-, (;/,~ ()u/1•1• JhNid /!tu:::il\ \fap \e,ttt< \fopolo1, ,(,11 • 2'1/- CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT IS/MND Figure 11. California Natural Diversity Database 1-mile Radius Search N 0 300 600 !~ l 1:20,000 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LA TIER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT This page left intentionally blank. CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT INITIAL STIJDY V. CULTURAL RESOURCES Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant with No Would the project: Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Impact Incorporation Impact a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in X '15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant X to '15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic X feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those X interred outside offm·mal cemeteries? Responses to Checklist Questions Responses a-d): No structures are located on the project site, and none of the features found on the site are historic in nature. As indicated in the Whispering Hills Estates Planned Community Final EIR, two archaeological sites were also identified during the field surveys conducted on the 470-acre Whispering Hills property. CA-ORA-25 was recorded in 1949 and described as a Native American campsite that was said to lie close to the south bank of San Juan Creek. The exact location of this site is unknown because it has not been observed since 1935. No vestiges of CA-ORA-25 mapped within the Whispering Hills property could be found during the field survey. A second site, CA-ORA-243 was recorded within the Lacouague Ranch, approximately 4,200 feet (0.8 mile) north of the Whispering Hills Estates Planned Community property, in 1967. Three areas were defined in this archaeological site; however, in 1985, only one of the areas was found. Areas 2 and 3 could not be located despite a thorough search of the Lacouague property. The 1985 survey concluded that CA-ORA-243 was the remnant of an occupation site, which was found to comprise a light to moderate scatter of prehistoric material covering an area of 15 acres. A thorough examination of the mapped location failed to yield any evidence that would support the claim that a portion of the archaeological site CA-ORA-243 was located on the Whispering Hills property. Furthermore, no additional isolated finds were discovered, despite a comprehensive search of the area. In summary, no archaeological resource of any kind were observed anywhere within the boundaries of the 470-acre Whispering Hills property. The City of San Juan Capistrano General Plan does not identify the project site as having historic buildings or structures, or prehistoric or historic archaeological resources. Additionally, there are no known unique cultural, historical, paleontological or archeological resources known to occur on, or within the immediate vicinity of the Project site. Furthermore, the site is not designated as a historical resource as defined by Public Resources Code§ 21084.1, or listed in, or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources. The project site is currently vacant and has been previously graded to accommodate development within the Whispering Hills Estates residential development and development of San Juan Hills High School. No instances of cultural resources or human remains have been unearthed on the project site during previous grading activities, and site visits have not identified any historical, cultural, paleontological, or archeological resources present on site. It is not anticipated that site grading and preparation activities would result in impacts to cultural, PAGE 49 INJ.'J!IAI.SrtiDY CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT historical, archaeological or paleontological resources. However, as with most projects in California that involve ground-disturbing activities, there is the potential for discovery of a previously-unknown cultural or historical resource or human remains. The implementation of the following mitigation measures would require appropriate steps to pres erve andjor document any previously undiscovered resources t hat may be encoun t ered during construction activities, including human remains. Implementation of this measure would reduce any potential impact to a less than significant level. Mitigation Measure Cul-1: A qualified archaeologist (defined as an archaeologist on the List of Certified Archaeologists for Orange County) shall be retained by the project applicant and shall be present at pre-construction meetings to advise construction contractors about the sensitive nature of cultural resources located on andjor in the vicinity of the project site, as well as monitoring requirements. A qualified monitor (defined as an individual with a bachelors degree in anthropology with archaeological monitoring experience), supervised by the qualified archaeologist, shall observe on- and off-site construction activities that result in grading, and/or excavating on or below the original ground surface (including during project-related off-site utility [natural gas, electricity, sewer, water, drainage, communications, etc.) and roadway improvements). Should nonhuman cultural resources be discovered, the monitor shall have the power to temporarily halt or divert construction activities until the qualified archaeologist can determine if the resources are significant and, if significant, until recovered by the archaeologist. In the event that human remains are discovered, construction activities shall be halted or diverted until the provisions of§7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code and §5097.98 of the Public Resources Code have been implemented. Mitigation Measure Cul-2: During construction/grading activities, a Native American monitor shall observe construction/grading activities that result in grading, excavating, and/or trenching on or below the original ground surface (including during project-related off-site utility [e.g., natural gas, electricity, sewer, water, drainage, communications, etc.] and roadway improvements). The Native American monitor shall consult with the archaeological monitor regarding objects and remains encountered during grading that may be considered sacred or important. In the event that evidence of human remains is discovered, the Native American monitor shall verifY that the archaeologist has notified the Coroner. Mitigation Measure Cul-3: If a significant Tribal Cultural Resource and/or unique archaeological resource is inadvertently discovered during ground disturbing activities for this the project, the ]uanefio Band of Mission Indians Acjachemen Nation OBMIAN) respectfully request avoidance as the preferred method of preservation for archaeological, historical, paleontological and Tribal Cultural Resources pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 21083.2 (b). If however, it is demonstrated that avoidance of a significant and/or unique cultural resource is infeasible, a data recovery plan shall be prepared and submitted to the City of San juan Capistrano and the ]BMIAN. Mitigation Measure Cul-4: If any prehistoric or historic artifacts, human remains or other indications of archaeological or paleontological resources are found during grading and construction activities, an archaeologist meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards in prehistoric or historical archaeology, as appropriate, shall be consulted to evaluate the finds and recommend appropriate mitigation measures. • If cultural resources are identified, every effort shall be made to avoid the resources, with preservation an important goal. If significant sites cannot feasibly be avoided, appropriate measures, such as data recovery excavations or photographic documentation of buildings, shall be undertaken consistent with applicable state and federal regulations. If the find is determined to be be a tribal cultural resource and the discovered archaeological resource cannot be avoided, then applicable mitigation measures for the resource shall be discussed with the geographically affiliated tribe. Applicable mitigation measures that also take into account the cultural values and meaning of the discovered tribal cultural resource, including confidentiality if requested by the CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT INITIALSWDY tribe, shall be completed (e.g., preservation in place, data recovery program pursuant to PRC §21083.2[i]). During evaluation or mitigative treatment, ground disturbance and construction work could continue on other parts of the project site. • If human remains are discovered, all work shall be halted immediately within SO meters (165 feet) of the discovery, the County Coroner must be notified, according to Section 5097.98 of the State Public Resources Code and Section 7050.5 of California's Health and Safety Code. If the remains are determined to be Native American, the coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission, and the procedures outlined in CEQA Section 15064.S(d) and (e) shall be followed. • If any fossils are encountered, there shall be no further disturbance of the area surrounding this find until the materials have been evaluated by a qualified paleontologist, and appropriate treatment measures have been identified. L PAGE51 fNITIALSTUDV CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS Potentially Less Than Less Than No Would the project: Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact a) Expose p e ople or structures to potential substantial advers e effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or de ath involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geolog ist for the area or based on other X substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Sp e cial Publication 42. ii) Strong s eismic ground sha king ? X iii) Seismic-r elated ground failure, including X liquefaction? iv) Landslides? X b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of X topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become un stable as a result of the project, and potentially r esult in on-or off-X s ite landslide, lateral spread ing, subsid enc e, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), X creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting th e use of septic t anks or alternative waste water X disposal systems where sewers are not available for th e disposal of waste water? Background A Geotechnical Review (Leighton and Associates, Inc., 2006) was prepared for the project site in association with a previously proposed development. Additionally, an As-Graded Report of Mass Grading (Leighton and Associates, Inc., 2007) was also prepared for the site. Further, a Third Party Geotechnical Review Qohn R. Byerly, Inc., 2016) was prepared for the project. De Novo Planning Group peer reviewed these reports for use in the Initial Study. Responses to Checklist Questions Responses a.i), a.ii), aiii): The project site is within the City of San Juan Capistrano, Orange County, near the southeastern tip of the Santa Ana Mountains and south of the San Joaquin Hills. As shown in Figure 12, the City is not located within and does not cross a delineated Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. Additionally, mapped earthquake faults do not exist within the City or the project site. All of Southern California, including the project site, is considered to be a seismically active region. Seismic hazards that may affect the site include ground shaking, PAGB52 J CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LA TIER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT INITIAL STUDY liquefaction, and dynamic settlement. Due to lack of faults in the immediate vicinity of the project site, other hazards such as ground rupture along a pre-existing fault of grounds lurching are considered unlikely. Liquefaction normally occurs when sites underlain by saturated, loose to medium dense, granular soils are subjected to relatively high ground shaking. During an earthquake, ground shaking may cause certain types of soil deposits to lose shear strength, resulting in ground settlement, oscillation, loss of bearing capacity, landsliding, and the buoyant rise of buried structures. The majority of liquefaction hazards are associated with sandy soils, silty soils oflow plasticity, and some gravelly soils. Cohesive soils are generally not considered to be susceptible to liquefaction. In general, liquefaction hazards are most severe within the upper 50 feet of the surface, except where slope faces or deep foundations are present. Significant liquefaction impacts are not anticipated, and mitigation would not be required. In order to minimize potential damage to the buildings and site improvements, all construction in California is required to be designed in accordance with the latest seismic design standards of the California Building Code. The California Building Code, Title 24, Part 2, Chapter 16 addresses structural design and Chapter 18 addresses soils and foundations. Collectively, these state requirements, which have been adopted by the City of San Juan Capistrano, include design standards and requirements that are intended to minimize impacts to structures in seismically active areas of California. Section 1613 specifically provides structural design standards for earthquake loads. Section 1803.5.11 and 1803.5.12 provide requirements for geotechnical investigations for structures assigned varying Seismic Design Categories in accordance with Section 1613. Design in accordance with these standards and policies would reduce any potential impact to the extent feasible. Absent any known faults, and because development of the proposed project must be designed in conformance with state and local standards and policies that limit risk from seismic shaking, any potential impact would be less than significant. Responses c), d): Expansive soils are those that undergo volume changes as moisture content fluctuates; swelling substantially when wet or shrinking when dry. Soil expansion can damage structures by cracking foundations, causing settlement and distorting structural elements. Expansion is a typical characteristic of clay-type soils. Expansive soils shrink and swell in volume during changes in moisture content, such as a result of seasonal rain events, and can cause damage to foundations, concrete slabs, roadway improvements, and pavement sections. Soil expansion is dependent on many factors. The more clayey, critically expansive surface soil and fill materials will be subjected to volume changes during seasonal fluctuations in moisture content. Figure 13 shows the soils within the Project site. The soils encountered at the site consist of mainly Calleguas clay loam and Alo clay (9 to 15 percent slopes), with some Alo clay (15 to 30 percent slopes) in the northern corner and some Cieneba sandy loam along the eastern boundary. On-site areas where loose, sandy soils exist below the water table may be subject to liquefaction in the event of a major earthquake. However, prior soil removal, recompaction and the installation of canyon drains prior to fill placement as part of the adjacent San Juan Hills High School and Whispering HUls project has significantly reduced the potential for liquefaction impacts. The bedrock areas of the site are not susceptible to liquefaction because of their high-density characteristics and lack of a shallow ground water table. According to the As-Graded Report of Mass Grading (Leighton and Associates, Inc., 2007) the expansion potential of the near-surface soils on the project site have a low to high expansion potential. Additionally, results of laboratory corrosivity tests conducted by Leighton and L PJ\GB53 J JNlTIAbSTUDY CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT Associates indicate that concrete in contact with the existing on-site earth material is expected to be subject to severe sulfate exposure. Ferrous metal components in contact with these soils are expected to be subjected to a corrosive environment. The As-Graded Report of Mass Grading contains measures to mitigate the potentially corrosive environment, including review of corrosion test results by a corrosion specialist, individual testing for soluble sulfates, and additional soil corrosion testing during future development of the site. Based on the geotechnical conclusions, the proposed project would require proper geotechnical design requirements to be incorporated into the building and improvement plans, and additional soil testing to further define the geotechnical engineering requirements for the individual structures. With implementation of the following mitigation measure, this potential impact would be reduced to a less than significant level. Mitigation Measure Geo-1 : Prior to earthmoving activities for the project, a certified geotechnical engineer, or equivalent, shall be retained to perform a final geotechnical evaluation of the soils at a design-level as required by the requirements of the California Building Code Title 24, Part 2, Chapter 18, Section 1803.1.1.2 related to expansive soils and other soil conditions. The evaluation shall be prepared in accordance with the standards and requirements outlined in California Building Code, Title 24, Part 2, Chapter 16, Chapter 17, and Chapter 18, which addresses structural design, tests and inspections, and soils and foundation standards. The final geotechnical evaluation shall include design recommendations to ensure that soil conditions do not pose a threat to the health and safety of people or structures, including threats from landslides, unstable soils, expansive soils, or post-construction settlement. The grading and improvement plans shall be designed in accordance with the recommendations provided in the final geotechnical evaluation. Response a.iv): There are several categories of landslides including: rockfalls, deep slope failure, and shallow slope failure. Factors such as the geological conditions, drainage, slope, vegetation, and others directly affect the potential for landslides. One of the most common causes of landslides is construction activity that is associated with road building (i.e. cut and fill). Figure 14 shows the landslide potential for the project site. As shown in the figure, the project southern portion of the site is located within a landslide hazard zone. The project site is in an area that was, prior to site grading, underlain by potentially compressible soils, ancient landslide deposits, and Tertiary-aged Capistrano Formation. The report notes the potential for reactivation of the offsite landslides is relatively low under current site conditions. In the event the offsite landslide was reactivated, the failure would occur at the location of its lowest factor of safety east of the project site and within the setback zone. A failure of this type would typically manifest itself in the form of some bulging in the toe area of the landslide at its weakest point and the setbacks recommended in the report (200 feet) provide a conservative setback distance and to avoid potential impacts associated with unstable slopes. The proposed project would be required to comply with all applicable development requirements included in the Uniform Building Code. Additionally, Mitigation Measure Geo-1 requires submittal of a final geotechnical evaluation of the project before it is built. This geotechnical evaluation would further refine the structural design, and would include design recommendations for the proposed structures. This is a less than significant impact and no mitigation is required. Response b): The project site is currently undeveloped and is not at significant risk of erosion under the existing conditions. Construction activities including grading could temporarily increase soil erosion during and shortly after project construction if not properly managed. Construction-related erosion could result in the loss of a substantial amount of nonrenewable topsoil and could adversely affect water quality in nearby surface waters. L PAGES4 CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT (NJnAL STIJDY The RWQCB requires a project specific Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to be prepared for each project that disturbs an area one acre or larger. The SWPPP includes project specific best management measures that are designed to control drainage and erosion. The proposed project includes detailed project specific drainage plan that control storm water runoff and erosion, both during and after construction. This plan is subject to the review and approval of the City through the improvement plan process. A Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) was prepared for the project (Commercial Development Resources, May 2017). The WQMP outlines the BMPs that will be incorporated into the project, as well as mechanisms through which the BMPs will be maintained. The SWPPP, the WQMP, and the project specific drainage plan will manage storm water and reduce the potential for erosion. Implementation of the following mitigation measure would ensure that the proposed project would result in a less-than-significant impact relative to this topic. Mitigation Measure Geo-2: The project applicant shall submit a Notice of Intent (NO/) and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP} to the RWQCB in accordance with the NPDES General Construction Permit requirements. The SWPPP shall be designed to control pollutant discharges utilizing Best Management Practices (BMPs) and technology to reduce erosion and sediments. BMPs may consist of a wide variety of measures taken to reduce pollutants in storm water runoff from the project site. Measures shall include temporary erosion control measures (such as silt fences, staked straw bales/wattles, silt/sediment basins and traps, check dams, geofabric, sandbag dikes, and temporary revegetation or other ground cover) that will be employed to control erosion from disturbed areas. Final selection of BMPs will be subject to approval by the City of San juan Capistrano and the RWQCB. The SWPPP will be kept on site during construction activity and will be made available upon request to representatives of the RWQCB and City. Response e): The proposed project would not require the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems for the disposal of waste water. Implementation of the proposed project would result in no impact relative to this topic. PAGE 55 INITIAL STUDY CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LA ITER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT This page left intentionally blank. PAGH56 J _, ;W HPttlmu I " . Analretm ( ' / ® ® @ Midway City Santa Ana @ Legend Quaternary Faults Well-constrained Moderately-constrained Inferred Alquist-Priolo Fault Zones " • 6 @ Lngrtna WOod."f \ \ t \ Norco J<-:4 Rund 0 ran g .e N ! Miles 1:500,000 ® .1/archAFB 1/(Jme Gardpns_,_ ·' H'oodcre:'lt R iN e r s i d e C o u n t y , I Perris Botmdl ® '· CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT IS/MND Figure 12. Earthquake Fault Map ••• INITIAL STUDY CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT This page left intentionally blank. PAGB58 Alo day, 9-15% slopes (2 .06 ac) Alo day, 15-30% slopes (0.22 ac) Calleguas day loam , 50-75 % slopes (2 .02 ac) Cieneba sandy loam, 30-75% slopes (0.06 ac) .~o !,n (s },'CY/:d,Sm'SI".IC' (),'a'r,Qc Cowl!' i:,C /' OdJ(if ',Jr•1, .\rJ•I(r \icl/'dCI I!' ·,·.'(1: ~ N 50 Feet 1:2 ,0 00 100 CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT IS/MND Figure 13 . Project Site Soils ••• INITIAL STuDY CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT This page left intentionally blank. L PAGB60 Legend D Project Location Landslide Hazard Zones 400 BOO Feet 1 16.000 CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT IS/MND Figure 14. Landslide Potential CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT This page left intentionally blank. PAGE62 CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT IN mALSTUDY XII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emiSSIOnS , either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on th e environment? b) Conflict with an applicabl e plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpos e of reducing the emissions of gre enhouse gasses? EXISTING SETTING Background • Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant with No Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Impact Incorooratlon Impact X X Various ga s es in the Earth's atmosphere, classified as atmospheric greenhouse gases (GHGs), play a critical role in determining the Earth's surface temperature. Solar radiation enters Earth's atmosphere from space, and a portion of the radiation is absorbed by the Earth's surface. The Earth emits this radiation back toward space, but the properties of the radiation change from high-frequency solar radiation to lower-frequency infrared radiation. Naturally occurring greenhouse gases include water vapor (H zO), carbon dioxide (CO z), methane (CH 4), nitrous oxide (NzO), and ozone (03). Several classes of halogenated substances that contain fluorine, chlorine, or bromine are also greenhouse gases, but they are, for the most part, solely a product of industrial activities. Although the direct greenhouse gases COz, CH 4, and NzO occur naturally in the atmosphere, human activities have changed their atmospheric concentrations. From the pre-industrial era (i.e., ending about 1750) to 2011, concentrations of these three greenhouse gases have increased globally by 40, 150, and 20 percent, respectively (IPCC, 2013). Greenhouse gases, which are transparent to solar radiation, are effective in absorbing infrared radiation. As a result, this radiation that otherwise would have escaped back into space is now retained, resulting in a warming of the atmosphere. This phenomenon is known as the greenhouse effect. Among the prominent GHGs contributing to the greenhouse effect are carbon dioxide (CO z), methane (CH1), ozone (03), water vapor, nitrous oxide (NzO), and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs ). The emissions from a single project will not cause global climate change, however, GHG emissions from multiple projects throughout the world could result in a cumulative impact with respect to global climate change. Therefore, the analysis of GHGs and climate change presented in this section is presented in terms of the proposed project's contribution to cumulative impacts and potential to result in cumulatively considerable impacts related to GHGs and climate change. Cumulative impacts are the collective impacts of one or more past, present, and future projects that, when combined, result in adverse changes to the environment. In determining the significance of a proposed project's contribution to anticipated adverse future conditions, a lead agency should generally undertake a two-step analysis. The first question is whether the combined effects from both the proposed project and other projects would be cumulatively significant. If the agency answers this inquiry in the affirmative, the second question is whether "the proposed project's incremental effects are cumulatively considerable" and thus significant in and of themselves. The cumulative project list for this issue (climate change) comprises PAGE63 INJTIALSTlJDV CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT anthropogenic (i.e., human-made) GHG emissions sources across the globe and no project alone would reasonably be expected to contribute to a noticeable incremental change to the global climate. However, legislation and executive orders on the subject of climate change in California have established a statewide context and process for developing an enforceable statewide cap on GHG emissions. Given the nature of environmental consequences from GHGs and global climate change, CEQA requires that lead agencies consider evaluating the cumulative impacts of GHGs. Small contributions to this cumulative impact (from which significant effects are occurring and are expected to worsen over time) may be potentially considerable and, therefore, significant. Significance Thresholds In 2008, the SCAQMD provided guidance to lead agencies on the determination of significance of GHG project emissions. As part of the process, the SCAQMD assembled a GHG Significance Threshold Working Group with the goal to develop and reach a consensus on acceptable significance thresholds to be used in CEQA analyses for GHG emissions on an interim basis until CARB (or another state agency) develops statewide guidance on assessing the significance of GHG emissions under CEQA. Initially, SCAQMD staff presented the GHG Significance Threshold Working Group with a significance threshold that could be applied to various types of projects (residential, non- residential, industrial, etc.). However, the threshold is still under development. In De cember 2008, staff presente d th e SCAQMD Governing Board with a significance threshold for stationary source projects for which SCAQMD is the lead agency. This threshold uses a tiered approach to determine a project's significance, with 10,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MTCOze) as a screening numerical threshold for stationary sources. It should be noted that when setting the 10,000 MTCOze threshold, the SCAQMD did not consider mobile sources (vehicular travel), but rather stationary source generators such as boilers, refineries, power plants, etc. Therefore, it would be misleading to apply a threshold that was developed without consideration for mobile sources to a project where the majority of emissions are related to mobile sources. Thus, there is no SCAQMD threshold that can be applied to the proposed project. In September 2010, the Working Group released additional revisions that consist of the following recommended tiered approach in determining the significance of residential and commercial projects as indicated in draft guidance issued by the SCAQMD, which includes: • Tier 1: If the project is exempt under existing statutory or categorical exemptions there is a presumption of "less-than-significant" impacts with respect to climate change. • Tier 2: If the project's GHG emissions are within the GHG budgets in an approved regional plan (plans consistent with CEQA sections 15064(h)(3), 15125(d), or 15152(s)), there is a presumption of "less-than-significant" impacts with respect to climate change. • Tier 3: Consists of screening values at the discretion of the lead agency; however, they should be consistent for all projects within its jurisdiction. Project-related construction emissions should be amortized over 30 years and should be added back the project's operational emissions. The following thresholds are proposed for consideration: o 3,000 MTCOze per year for all land use types; or o 3,500 MTCOze per year for residential; 1,400 MTCOze per year for commercial; or 3,000 MTC02e per year for mixed-use projects. L PAGE64 ] CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT INITIAL STUDY • Tier 4: Does the project meet one of the following performance standards? If yes, there is a presumption of"less-than-significant" impacts with respect to climate change. o Option 1: Reduce emissions from business as usual by a certain percentage (currently undefined); o Option 2: Early implementation of applicable AB 32 Scoping Plan measures; or o Option 3: A project-level efficiency target of 4.8 MTC02e per service population as a 2020 target and 3.0 MTCOze per service population as a 2035 target. The recommended plan-level target for 2020 is 6.6 MTCO ze and the plan level target for 2035 is 4.1 MTCOze. • Tier 5: Involves mitigation offsets to achieve target significance thresholds (SCAQMD, 2010). The SCAQMD has also adopted Rules 2700, 2701, and 2702 that address GHG reductions. However, these rules address boilers and process heater, forestry, and manure management projects, none ofwhich are required by the proposed project. The City of San Juan Capistrano has not adopted its own numeric threshold of significance for determining impacts with respect to GHG emissions, and relies upon the SCAQMD draft screening level threshold. Therefore, for the proposed project, the 3,000 MT COze per year non- industrial screening threshold is used for the significance threshold, in addition to the qualitative thresholds of significance set forth below from Section VII of Appendix G to the CEQA Guidelines. RESPONSES TO CHECKLIST QUESTIONS Responses a), b): The proposed project's short-term construction-related and long-term operational GHG emissions for buildout of the proposed project, were estimated using the California Emission Estimator Model (CalEEMod)™ (v.2016.3.1). CalEEMod is a statewide model designed to provide a uniform platform for government agencies, land use planners, and environmental professionals to quantify GHG emissions from land use projects. The model quantifies direct GHG emissions from construction and operation (including vehicle use), as well as indirect GHG emissions, such as GHG emissions from energy use, solid waste disposal, vegetation planting and/or removal, and water use. Emissions are expressed in annual metric tons of C02 equivalent units of measure (i.e., MTCOze ), based on the global warming potential of the individual pollutants. Short-Term Construction GHG Emissions Estimated increases in GHG emissions associated with construction of the proposed project are summarized in Table 7. Table 7: Construction GHG Emissions (Unmitigated) Year MTCOze 2017 82.6496 2018 265.4873 Maximum Per Year 265.4873 Overall Total 348.1369 30· Year Annual Amortized Rate 11.6046 SOURCE: CALEEMDD (V.2016.3 .1}. [ PAGB65 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT As presented in the table, construction activities would generate 348.1369 MT CO ze total, which is equivalent to 11.60 MT COze per year over a 30-year amortization period. Construction GHG emissions would cease upon completion of the construction phase of the project and would therefore be a small fraction of total project-related emissions when considering the longevity of operation emissions associated with the project. Additionally, GHG emissions gen e r at ed by construction activities can be reduced by reducing the amount of construction and demolition waste generated by the project. To encourage recycling and salvaging of construction and demolition debris, the City of San Juan Capistrano requires that a minimum of SO percent (as measured by tonnage) of all construction demolition debris containing concrete and asphalt, and 15 percent of all construction and demolition debris not containing concrete and asphalt be diverted from landfills (City of San Juan Capistrano Municipal Code Section 6-3.08.01). These construction GHG emissions are a one-time release and are comparatively much lower than overall emissions associated with operational phases of a project. Construction GHG emissions from the proposed project do not impede local GHG reduction efforts, or violate GHG reduction goals set by AB 32, as required by the Public Resources Code, Section 21082.2. Therefore, cumulatively these construction emissions would not generate a significant contribution to global climate change. Long-Term Operational GHG Emissions The long-term operational GHG emissions estimate for buildout of the proposed project incorporates the potential area source and vehicle emissions, and emissions associated with utility and water usage, and wastewater and solid waste generation. GHG emissions generated during the operational phase of the proposed project would include emissions from transportation, energy, waste disposal, water consumption, and area sources. GHG emissions from project-related operational activities are included in Table 8. For the operational phase, the proposed project's GHG emissions are separated into emission sources for the applicable GHG emissions sectors established by CARB. Mobile sector emissions are emissions produced from vehicular travel to and from the project site. Energy sector emissions include indirect sources of energy (electricity and natural gas). Area emissions include emissions from landscaping activities. Solid waste emissions are generated by the decomposition over time of trash sent to landfill. Water sector emissions are produced from the transport of water to and from the project site. In general, transportation sector emissions make up the largest proportion of emissions associated with a project. The second largest source of emissions is from area sources. Table 8: Operational GHG Emissions (Unmiti,qated Emissions Cate,qory MT COze I Year Area 4.4000e-004 Energy 65.4473 Mobile 222 .8774 Solid Waste 47.4689 Water 5.8707 Total Operational GHG Emissions 341.6646 SOURCE: CALEEMOD (v.2016.3.1}. L PAGlt66 ] CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT Overall GHG Emissions As shown in Table 8, proposed project operations would generate approximately 341.6646 MT C02e per year. In addition, as shown in Table 7, construction emissions (amortized over 30 years) would generate 11.6046 MT C02e per year. This results in a total of 353.2692 MT C02e per year. The 3,000 MT C02e per year threshold established by the SCAQMD draft screening level threshold would not be exceeded in either the mitigated or unmitigated scenarios. Conclusion As described above, the proposed project would not generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that would have a significant impact on the environment. In addition, the proposed project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gasses. Therefore, there is a less than significant impact relative to this topic. PAGB67 INmALSTUDY CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT VIII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Potentially Less '17/lall Less ThOll Woultl the pro}.e ot: Slgn!ftcJm t Sl.9niflcant with Significant No Mitigation /mpo at Impact lneorPQration Impact a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or X disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset X and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or X waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materi als sites compil ed pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, X would it create a s ignificant hazard to the public or th e environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use X airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? t) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard X for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or X emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to X urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Responses to Checklist Questions Responses a), b): The proposed church would not routinely transport, use, or dispose of hazardous materials, or present a reasonably foreseeable release of hazardous materials, with the exception of common hazardous materials such as household cleaners, paint, etc. The operational phase of the proposed project does not pose a significant hazard to the public or the environment. Onsite reconnaissance and historical records indicate that there are no known underground storage tanks or pipelines located on the project site that contain hazardous materials. Therefore, the disturbance of such items during construction activities is unlikely. Construction equipment and materials would likely require the use of petroleum based products (oil, L PAGE68 CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT INITJALSTUDY gasoline, diesel fuel), and a variety of common chemicals including paints, cleaners, and solvents. Transportation, storage, use, and disposal of hazardous materials during construction activities would be required to comply with applicable federal, state, and local statutes and regulations. Compliance would ensure that human health and the environment are not exposed to hazardous materials. Therefore, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact relative to this issue. Response c): The project site is within the % mile radius of the nearest school. The closest school is San Juan Hills High School located opposite the private driveway, approximately SO feet to the west of the project site. The operations of a church facility would not emit hazardous emissions or result in the storage or handling of hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances or waste other than common hazardous materials such as household cleaners, paint, etc. Implementation of the proposed project would result in a less than significant impact relative to this topic. Response d): According the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) there are no Federal Superfund Sites, State Response Sites, or Voluntary Cleanup Sites on, or in the vicinity of the project site. The project site is not included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code§ 65962.5. The nearest investigation site includes: • Solag Disposal Site (site # 30990002): This site, located at 31731 Paseo Adelanto (approximately 2.7 miles west of the project site), is a Voluntary Cleanup Site which has a status of No Further Action. The site was investigated for lead contamination because of the previous uses of the site, which include truck storage and maintenance and transfer of household recycled waste. No potential hazards have been identified with this site. Implementation of the proposed project would result in a less than significant impact relative to this environmental topic. Responses e), f): The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) establishes distances of ground clearance for take-off and landing safety based on such items as the type of aircraft using the airport. The project site is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip. The closest airstrip is the John Wayne Airport approximately 18.5 miles northwest of the project site. According to the Orange County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport, the project site is not located within any of the safety zones. The project site is not located within one mile of the airport, nor along the extended runway centerline. The proposed project consists of one church building structure and one pavilion structure, and does not propose any structures of substantial height that would protrude into active airspace. Building height would be consistent with surrounding uses. Therefore, safety hazards related to the project's proximity to airports are less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Response g): The City of San Juan Capistrano has prepared an Emergency Preparedness Plan that designates procedures to be followed in case of a major emergency. The plan identifies resources available for emergency response and establishes coordinated action plans for specific emergency situations and disasters, including earthquakes, fires, major rail and roadway accidents, flooding, hazardous materials incidents, civil disturbance, and nuclear disasters and attack. The project site is not designated for emergency use within the Emergency Preparedness Plan . PACE 69 JNI'J!IALS1'1JDY CHURCH OF }ESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT The primary concern in the Public Safety Element is risks to persons and personal property. Development of the project site as proposed will not adversely affect either the evacuation routes or the adopted emergency preparedness planning program(s) being implemented by the City of San Juan Capistrano. The proposed project does not include any actions that would impair or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. Implementation of the proposed project would result in no impact on this environmental topic. Response h): The risk of wildfire is related to a variety of parameters, including fuel loading (vegetation), fire weather (winds, temperatures, humidity levels and fuel moisture contents), and topography (degree of slope). Steep slopes contribute to fire hazard by intensifying the effects of wind and making fire suppression difficult. Fuels such as grass are highly flammable because they have a high surface area to mass ratio and require less heat to reach the ignition point, while fuels such as trees have a lower surface area to mass ratio and require more heat to reach the ignition point. The California Department of Forestry has designated the eastern edge of the City, south of Ortega Highway, as a Local Responsibility Area (LRA), which is within the very high fire hazard severity zone; however, this rating does not extend to the project site. Additionally, the proposed project would not include any habitable structures that would expose people to significant ri sk of loss , injury, or death involving wildland fires. Because the project site is not located within a designated wildfire hazard area, this is a less than significant impact and no mitigation is required. [ PAGB70 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT INITIAL STUDY IX HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Pot~ntlally ussTir,tm tess Than Significant with No Wou ld the project: Significant Mitigation Slgnlflc an~ lmpaot Impact fn corp_oratlon Impact a) Violate any water quality standards or waste X discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table X level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner X which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially X increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on-or off- site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned X stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard X Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 1 00-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood X flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including X flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X Responses to Checklist Questions Response a): Implementation of proposed project would not violate any water quality or waste discharge requirements. Construction activities including grading could temporarily increase soil erosion rates during and shortly after project construction. Construction-related erosion could result in the loss of soil and could adversely affect water quality in nearby surface waters. The RWQCB requires a project specific SWPPP to be prepared for each project that disturbs an area one acre or larger. The SWPPP is required to include project specific best management PAGB71 ] INITIAl. STUDY CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT measures that are designed to control drainage and erosion. A SWPPP has been prepared for the project, and the SWPPP would be implemented throughout the construction phase of the project. The SWPPP is designed to reduce the potential for the proposed project to violate water quality standards during construction. The RWQCB requires regular monitoring and reporting to ensure that the SWPPP is effectively controlling stormwater pollution. This is a regulatory requirement that is required of all projects, and would mitigate the potential for an impact to occur. Implementation of the proposed project would result in a less-than-significant impact relative to this topic. Response b): The proposed project would connect to the City of San Juan Capistrano water system. The City of San Juan Capistrano Utilities Department provides water and wastewater services to the project site. The Utilities Department derives its domestic water from three sources: (1) 45 percent is purchased from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) and consists of water from the Colorado River via the Colorado River Aqueduct and Northern California water via the State Water Project; (2) approximately 44 percent of the City's water supply is produced by its Groundwater Recover Plant; and (3) the remaining 11 percent is obtained from local groundwater wells located within the City. The proposed project would not substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer vol u me or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted). The project site is not a recharge site. Project construction would add additional impervious surfaces to the project site; however, the northern portion of the site would remain largely pervious, which would allow infiltration to underlying groundwater. The water quality basin would continue to contribute to groundwater recharge following construction of the project. In addition, the project is not anticipated to significantly affect groundwater quality because sufficient stormwater infrastructure would be constructed as part of project to detain and filter stormwater runoff and prevent long-term water quality degradation. Therefore, project construction and operation would not substantially deplete or interfere with groundwater supply or quality. This impact would be less than significant. Responses c-e): When land is in a natural or undeveloped condition, precipitation will infiltrate/percolate the soils. Much of the rainwater that falls on natural or undeveloped land slowly infiltrates the soil and is stored either temporarily or permanently in underground layers of soil. When the soil becomes completely soaked or saturated with water or the rate of rainfall exceeds the infiltration capacity of the soil, the rainwater begins to flow on the surface of land to low lying areas, ditches, channels, streams, and rivers. Rainwater that flows off of a site is defined as storm water runoff. When a site is in a natural condition or is undeveloped, a larger percentage of rainwater infiltrates into the soil and a smaller percentage flows off the site as storm water runoff. The infiltration and runoff process is altered when a site is developed with urban uses. Houses, buildings, roads, and parking lots introduce asphalt, concrete, and roofing materials to the landscape. These materials are relatively impervious, which means that they absorb less rainwater. As impervious surfaces are added to the ground conditions, the natural infiltration process is reduced. As a result, the volume and rate of storm water runoff increases. The increased volumes and rates of storm water runoff can result in flooding in some areas if adequate storm drainage facilities are not provided. CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT JNITJALSTlJDY There are no rivers, streams, or water courses located on or immediately adjacent to the project site. As such, there is no potential for the project to alter a water course, which could lead to on or offsite flooding. Drainage improvements associated with the project site would be located on the project site, and the project would not alter or adversely impact offsite drainage facilities. The proposed project would increase impervious surfaces throughout the project site. The proposed project would require the installation of storm drainage infrastructure to ensure that storm waters properly drain from the project site. The proposed storm drainage plan includes an engineered network of storm drain lines, manholes, inlets, and a water quality basin. The storm drainage plan was designed and engineered to ensure proper construction of storm drainage infrastructure to control runoff and prevent flooding, erosion, and sedimentation. The City Engineer reviews all storm drainage plans as part of the improvement plan submittal to ensure that all facilities are designed to the City's standards and specifications. The City Engineer also reviews all storm drainage plans to ensure that post-project runoff does not exceed pre-project runoff. The City Engineer's review of pre-and post-project runoff is intended to ensure that the capacity of the existing storm drainage system is not exceeded. This determination is ultimately made by the City Engineer during the improvement plan review and approval. Mitigation Measure Hydro-1 will require the post-project runoff to be equal to or less than pre-project runoff, which would ensure that the proposed project would not substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on-or off-site. The storm drainage plan will require the construction of new storm water drainage facilities on the project site; however, the construction of these facilities would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the area, or alter the course of a stream or river. Implementation of the proposed project with the following mitigation measure would have a less-than-significant impact relative to this environmental topic. Mitigation Measure Hydro-1: The storm drainage plan shall be designed and engineered to ensure that post-project runoff is equal to or less than pre-project runoff The applicant shall provide the City Engineer with all storm water runoff calculations with the improvement plan submittal. Response f): Construction activities including grading could temporarily increase soil erosion rates during and shortly after project construction. Construction-related erosion could result in the loss of soil and could adversely affect water quality in nearby surface waters. The RWQCB requires a project specific SWPPP to be prepared for each project that disturbs an area one acre or larger. The SWPPP is required to include project specific best management measures that are designed to control drainage and erosion. A SWPPP has been prepared for the proposed project and will be implemented throughout the construction phase of the project. Furthermore, the proposed project includes a storm drainage plan that controls storm water runoff and erosion after construction. The SWPPP and the storm drainage plan would reduce the potential for polluted runoff and/or degradation of water quality. Implementation of the proposed project would result in a less-than-significant impact relative to this topic. Responses g-h): As shown in Figure 15, the project site is located within Flood Zone X, which is not within the 100-year flood zone as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). The closest 100-year flood zone is located to the north near San Juan Creek Road, outside of the project site. Implementation of the proposed project would have no impact relative to this environmental topic. Response i): The project site is not located within an area with a control levee or dam. As shown in Figure 16, the project site is not located within a dam inundation area. The proposed project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death PAGB73 CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT involving flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam. Implementation of the proposed project would have no impact relative to this environmental topic. Response j): The project site is not anticipated to be inundated by a tsunami because it is located at an elevation of 414 to 428 feet above sea level and is approximately 4.15 miles away from the Pacific Ocean which is the closest ocean waterbody. Implementation of the proposed project would have no impact relative to this environmental topic. The project site is not anticipated to be inundated by a seiche because it is not located in close proximity to a water body capable of creating a seiche. Implementation of the proposed project would have no impact relative to this environmental topic. A mudflow is a category of landslide that is associated with heavy saturation of soils and sometimes is associated with seismicity. Factors such as the geological conditions, drainage, slope, vegetation, and others directly affect the potential for mudflow. The City's General Plan EIR does not identify mudslides as a topic of concern. Additionally, the project site is essentially flat and would be graded as part of the project. No steep areas that would have the potential to generate mudflows during operations would be created. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would have no impact relative to this environmental topic. L PAGB74 -· - ( Unincorporated Orange County '\ \ -\ ., \ .. } o'.f ( ~,~ \ ,. ..... - - ..... _-..... ,._. \ r ~- ... ,~ ~ I ' I ...,_ .. ~ I CJty of San Juan Capistrano -f , Legend 0 Project Location L.-:-.·J City Boundary 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard (100-yr Flood Zone) 0 Regulatory Floodway - 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard (500-yr Flood Zone) ~('111ft' f'/.\1./l:l.,,.d//(l=llldlr.-\'t'l 11flp.\PtH, ()l,u,;.:r l'oum• 11r(i!.~ {joiiU'• 11vr,'d,,r •• r: 'vfur ~,.,:,(, lfoifirlr<l• Hr11 'J 2•11~ \ -\ , ... ~ . ' ' __. _.,..-·-....-·-·-r· ·--·-• ..,._.~;.• I ...., ... .., .. .. . , A: ._ • -.. c,amlno del R.o I City of San Clemente 750 1 SOD I I I Feet 1:36,000 CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT IS/MND Figure 15. FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map ••• INITIAL S'l1tJDY CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LA TIER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT This page left intentionally blank. L PAGB76 ,, • -- :,.'? ;, ,. il J ex: 0 Unincorporated Orange G~ounty "' ~ • • Jt/'f .-"""' .. ,,! ... ... I .~ .. . r \ \ ~ \ f {. 0' \ ..... .. Pt ,/j ~ ,;: " 'II -""' .~y , •• \ --\ \ ' • "'' Cj <JJ' San Juan Capistrano }- r- J • I Legend c:J Project Boundary .--··, l ___ _! City Boundary -Trampas Canyon Dam Inundation Area \,/oi tl' ( or!i(,; 11(1 ()1/tl' rf /1;1 'J!I II< \ \tr•lr•·' ~!o lio \~ ((/, /)(ill• },,,,,,Jt: //11/' ~~ 1 : 1 ( ), oll'o!l (',uul/; ,jo,(i/~-Un/;;" JJ'u;l ti \1:•r· 'H ''• I ': Ho,r \{:: ') ~f!/ • . .. .. :..\ " -· ' l ( ...... • ~ ... I ' ... ~ .. ' r'\tO ..<' ~,. G. ~~ n ~ c:~ G")''"' c'> (,31~:~ City of San Clemente • N ! 750 1,500 I I Feet 1 36 000 CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT IS/MND Figure 16. Dam Inundation Areas ... ~ '·· "'t •••• JNI'I'JALSTUDV CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT This page left intentionally blank. PA'GB 72 CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT INJTIALS'MJDY X. LAND USE AND PLANNING Potentially Le1~sThan Less ·Than Would the project: Slgn[/loant Significant wltlr Slgnlflaant No Mitigation lmp"Qct Impact lnaoroorauon Impact a) Physically divide an established community? X b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general X plan, specific plan , local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation X plan or natural community conservation plan? Responses to Checklist Questions Response a): The proposed project includes development of church uses on an undeveloped site that is surrounded by residential uses, a public school, and open space. The proposed public church is consistent with the surrounding uses and would not physically divide an established community. Implementation of the proposed project would have a less than significant impact relative to this topic. Response b): The key planning documents that are directly related to, or that establish a framework within which the proposed project must be consistent, include: • City of San Juan Capistrano General Plan • City of San Juan Capistrano Zoning Ordinance The project site currently has a Planned Community (PC) General Plan Land Use Designation and PC Zoning Designation. The PC designation denotes large areas of land under single or common ownership for detailed planning and development for residential, commercial, industrial, public/institutional, recreation, and open space uses. The Whispering Hills Estates PC zone, however, envisioned single family residential uses on the project site. The applicant has proposed to amend CDP 04-01 to allow the proposed church use with a Conditional Use Permit. The church use is being reviewed based on the CDP 04-01 proposed amendment. Approval of the code amendment and conditional use permit would create consistency between the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance for the project site. The proposed code amendment does not cause a significant physical environmental impact. The purpose of the code amendment and Conditional Use Permit is to ensure that the project does not conflict with applicable Zoning. The project, as proposed, would not conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of the City. Implementation of the proposed project would have a less than significant impact relative to this issue. Response c): The project site is not located within an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan . In July of 1996, the Orange County Central-Coastal NCCP Subregional Plan was adopted. However, the City of San Juan Capistrano is not a signatory in the NCCP and the project site is not within the jurisdiction of the NCCP or any other adopted Habitat Conservation Plan or Natural Community Conservation Plan. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would have no impact relative to this issue. L PAGS79 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT XI. MINERAL RESOURCES PorentJ'lifiJP 'Las"~ TI IJtn L ess 71han Slolifflarl!It wJCII No Would' rli'e Pfllf:Jt1.Qc: S}JJrl'f/iiCtl11t 'Aflti!Jail tm Slgnlffcant Impact i m paD t lncoroorotlon Impact a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource t hat would be of value to the X region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site X delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Responses to Checklist Questions Response a): The California Geological Survey (CGS) has mapped mineral and mineral aggregate resources in Orange County. The MRZ-1 designation covers the site and the surrounding area, a designation defined as "areas where adequate information indicates that no significant construction aggregate deposits are present, or where it is judged that little likelihood exists for their presence" (CDMG, 1995). No mineral extraction operations exist at the property. Additionally, there are no oil and gas extraction wells within or near the property. Implementation of the proposed project would have no impact relative to this issue. Response b): The project site does not contain a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan. The proposed project would not result in loss of a mineral resource. Implementation of the proposed project would have no impact relative to this issue. CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT XII. NOISE Pot entially Less Tllan tess Than Wq'llld tile project result In: Significant Significant with Significant No Mitigation Impa ct Impact Jnc.<mJomtlon Impact a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local X general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne X noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels X existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above X levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use X airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? t) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing X or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Background A Noise Impact Analysis (2017) was prepared by Giroux & Associates for the proposed project. The following is a summary of the report, which is contained in Appendix D. Regulatory Framework City o(San luan Capistrano Gen eral Plan Noise Elem ent: The City of San Juan Capistrano General Plan Noise Element establishes noise standards for land use categories based on the State of California Office of Noise Control land use compatibility recommendations. Table 9 shows the community noise exposure recommended as normally acceptable, conditionally acceptable, normally unacceptable, and clearly unacceptable for various classes of land use sensitivity. The City guidelines recommend an exterior noise exposure of less than 60 dB CNEL for churches. Church development with noise exposures of up to 65 dB CNEL are considered "conditionally acceptable" and may be permitted if noise mitigation is included in the design. Noise levels between 70 and 80 dB CNEL are considered to be "normally unacceptable". Compatibility standards have a dual purpose. For outdoor assembly areas, an exterior exposure of 65 dB CNEL allows for intelligible conversation without noticeable interruption. Structural noise attenuation in air-conditioned non-residential structures with fixed sash windows is typically 30 to 35 dB. When exterior levels are 65 dB CNEL or less, interior levels in such buildings are generally 30 to 35 dB CNEL. Levels of less than 45 dB CNEL are normally considered wholly unobtrusive into noise sensitive uses such as prayer, reading, contemplation, etc. An exterior L PAG£81 INili'IALSTUDY CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT ambient noise level of 65 dB CNEL or less is considered to not create a noise constraint for the proposed project. Table 9: City of San juan Capistrano Noise/Land Use Compatibility Matrix Community Noise Equivalent Level Land Use Categories (CNEL, dB) 55 60 65 70 75 80 Residential -Single Family, Multifamily, Duplex A A 8 8 c ------ Residential-Mobile Homes A A 8 c c ----- Transient Lodging-Motels, Hotels A A 8 8 c c --- Schools, Libraries, Churches, Hospitals, Nursing Homes A A 8 c c _.,.._ --- Auditoriums, Concert Halls, Amphitheaters, Meeting Halls 8 8 c c -------- Sports Arenas, Outdoor Spectator Sports, Amusement Parks A A A 8 8 ------ Playgrounds, Neighborhood Parks A A A 8 c ------ Golf Courses, Riding Stables, Cemeteries A A A A 8 c c Office and Professional Buildings A A A 8 B c --- Commercial Retail, Banks, Restaurants, Theaters A A A A B B c Industrial, Manufacturing, Utilities, Wholesale, Service Stations A A A A B B B Agriculture A A A A A A A INTERPRETATION: A: NORMALLY ACCEPTABLE SPECIFIED LAND USE IS SATISFACTORY, BASED UPON THE ASSUMPTION THAT ANY BUILDINGS INVOLVED ARE OF NORMAL CONVENTIONAL CONSTRUCTION, WITHOU T ANY SPECIAL NOISE INSUlATION REQUIREMENTS . 8 : CONDITIONALLY ACCEPTABLE NEW CONSTRUCTION OR DEVELOPMENT SHOULD BE UNDERTAKEN ONLY AFTER A DETAILED ANALYSIS OF C: NORMALLY UNACCEPTABLE THE NOISE REQUIREMENTS IS MADE AND NEEDED NOISE INSUlATION FEATURES INCLUDED IN THE DESIGN. CONVENTIONAL CONSTRUCTION, BUT WITH CLOSED WINDOWS AND FRESH AIR SUPPLY SYSTEMS OR AIR CONDITIONING WILL NORMALLY SUFFICE. NEW CONSTRUCTION OR DEVELOPMENT SHOULD GENERALLY BE DISCOURAGED. IF IT DOES PROCEED, A DETAILED ANALYSIS OF THE NOISE REDUCTION REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MADE AND NEEDED NOISE INSULATION FEATURES INCLUDED IN THE DESIGN. ---:CLEARLY UNACCEPTABLE NEW CONSTRUCTION OR DEVELOPMENT SHOULD GENERALLY NOT BE UNDERTAKEN. SOURCE: SANJUAN CAPISTRANO GENERAL PlAN FINAL PROGRAM EIR; DECEMBER 1999 Stationary noise standards are typically articulated in the jurisdictional Municipal Code. These standards recognize the varying noise sensitivity of both transmitting and receiving land uses. The property line noise performance standards are normally structured according to land use and time-of-day. They apply mainly to mechanical equipment or to nuisance sources such as amplified voice or music. Cit;y ofSan /uan Capistrano Municipal Code: The City Noise Ordinance (Section 9-3.531 of the City's Municipal Code) is designed to protect people from non-transportation (stationary) no is e. The Noise Ordinance for the City of San Juan Capistrano sets limits on the level and the duration of time a stationary noise source may impact an adjoining residential use as shown in Table 10 and summarized below. For a sensitive land use zone, the noise standards at the residential property line are as follows: • 7:00a.m. to 7:00p.m.: 65 dBA • 7:00p.m. to 10:00 p.m.: 55 dBA • 10:00 p.m. to 7:00a.m.: 45 dBA PAGE&2 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT INITIAL STUDY Table 10: San juan Capistrano Noise Ordinance Standards Land Use Time Period Maximum Permissible Noise Level (dBA) Lso Lzs Lo Lz Lmax 7:00a.m. to 7:00p.m. 65 70 75 80 85 Residential 7:00p.m. to 10 :00 p.m. 55 60 65 70 75 10:00 p.m. to 7:00a.m. 45 50 55 60 65 7:00a.m. to 7 :00p.m. 65 70 75 80 85 Public and Institutional 7:00p.m. to 10:00 p.m. 55 60 65 70 75 10:00 p.m. to 7:00a.m. 45 50 55 60 65 7:00a.m. to 7 :00p.m. 65 70 75 80 85 Commercial 7:00p.m. to 10:00 p.m. 65 70 75 80 85 10:00 p.m. to 7:00a.m. 65 70 75 80 85 SPECIAL PROVISIONS: THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES SHALL BE EXEMPTED FROM THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION: 1. SCHOOL BANDS, SCHOOL ATHLETIC, AND SCHOOL ENTERTAINMENT EVENTS; 2 . NOISE SOURCES ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION, REPAIRS, REMODELING, OR THE GRADING OF ANY REAL PROPERTY, EXCEPT THAT SUCH ACTIVITIES SHALL NOT BE EXEMPT FROM THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION IF CONDUCTED FROM 6 :00 P.M . TO 7:00A.M. ON MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY, OR FROM 4 :30P.M. TO 8 :30A.M. ON SATURDAY, OR AT ANY TIME ON SUNDAY OR A NATIONAL HOLIDAY. SOURCE: GIROUX & ASSOCIATES, 2017. The City's noise ordinance limits are stated in terms of a 30-minute limit with allowable deviations from this 50th percentile standard. The louder the level becomes, the shorter the time becomes that it is allowed to occur with a maximum of +20 dB for less than one minute per hour. Table 10 lists the noise level and the maximum cumulative period of time that the noise level may occur during a one-hour period. The standards in Table 10 apply at any residential property line. However, the ordinance identifies events which are exempt from the provisions of the noise restrictions. According to the code, school bands, school athletic and school entertainment events are exempt from the standards. The code also exempts construction noise from the ordinance standards as long as construction occurs from 7:00a.m to 6:00p.m. Monday through Friday or 8:30a.m. to 4:30p.m. on Saturday. Construction is not permitted on Sundays or federal holidays. The closest noise-sensitive daytime uses are the adjoining high school. Although the campus is not specifically protected from construction activity noise by the City' noise ordinance, where feasible, the grading contractor should coordinate with management of the school facilities to schedule the noisiest activities during periods of lesser sensitivity. The closest residence is located approximately 450 feet to the south of the project site, opposite Vista Montana. Baseline Noise Levels Noise measurements were made in order to document existing baseline levels in the area. The measurements help to serve as a basis to determine noise exposure from ambient noise activities upon the proposed project. In year 2013, for a previously proposed residential project, Giroux & Associates conducted long term (24-hour) noise measurements on Tuesday, January 15, to Wednesday, January 16, at four locations on the site, as shown in Figure 17. Because the measurements were several years old, short term noise measurements were made on Thursday, May 10, 2017, between the hours of 2 :00p.m. and 2:55p.m. atthe same locations to verify consistency. PAGE83 J CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT The short-term results are shown in Table 11 and the long-term monitoring results are shown in Table 12. Sites 2 and 4 were almost identical in 2013 and 2017. Site 1 was slightly louder in 2013, but had active nearby tennis practice in 2013 but not in 2017. Baseline noise levels have changed negligibly in the last five years. Table 11 · Baseline Noise Measurement Results Leq Lmax Lmin L1o Ln Lso L9o ST Meter 1 4·7 61 36 51 44 42 39 ST Meter 2 51 66 36 54 48 46 40 ST Meter 4 58 68 38 62 56 54 42 SOURCE: GIROUX & ASSOCIATES, 2017. Table 12: Noise Measurements-Existin_q Hourly Leq's (dB) Time Interval LeqsMeter 1 LeqsMeter 2 LeqsMeter3 LeqsMeter4 1 2 :00-13 :0 0 55 .4 45.4 59.2 59.2 13:00-14:00 68 .4 45.9 58.6 58.0 14:00-15 :00 55.8 52.3 59.2 58.8 15:00-16:00 56 .4 52.1 60.1 57.8 16:00-17:00 61 .5 56.2 61.0 57.0 17:00-18:00 58 .1 54.4 60.4 56.1 18:00-19:00 55.3 4 9.9 57.8 52.2 19:00-20:00 51.2 46.9 58.6 53.1 20:00-21:00 48.6 47.3 53.3 49.1 21:00-22:00 40.7 42.9 50.4 45.5 22:00-23:00 39.9 44.5 45 .5 42.0 2 3 :00-24:00 39.5 48.4 41.8 40.2 0:00-1 :00 41 .5 3 9.5 43.3 41.8 1:00-2 :00 3 9.4 34.1 41.5 41.4 2:00-3:00 40.0 33.6 41.6 37.9 3:00-4:00 42.1 37.0 45.9 40.8 4:00-5:00 41.8 36.2 43.0 39.6 5 :00 :6 :00 43 .9 40.7 45.8 44.2 6:00-7:00 52.7 50.2 61.0 57.1 7:00-8:00 54.0 52.3 65.2 61.8 8:00-9:00 55.1 51.0 59.8 59.0 9:00-10:00 50.2 45.6 56.5 54.8 10 :00-11:00 50 .1 47.7 54.1 51.4 11:00-12:00 44.2 41.3 55.2 55.2 Resultant CNEL (dB) Measurement Meter 1 Meter2 Meter3 Meter4 Parameter 24-Hour CNEL 57.9 52.6 60.9 57.7 SOURCE : GIROUX & A SSOCIATES, 2017. In both 2013 and 2017, audible daytime noise sources included student athletic activity on the tennis courts, occasional traffic on Stallion Ridge, formerly Vista Montana, distant trash trucks rumbling on La Pata Avenue, and a low frequency hum and rumble from the tub grinder at the greenwaste recyclingjcomposting facility on La Pata Avenue. Humidity was too low to generate any hissing noise from the power line conductors. Monitoring experience shows that 24-hour weighted CNEL's are approximately equal to mid- day Leq plus 2 to 3 dB (Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement, 2009). At Meter 1, located at the northwest corner of the project site directly across from the high school tennis courts, observed PAGI! 84 CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT JNITJALSJ'UDY noise levels were almost 58 dB CNEL in 2013. The short-term noise measurement in 2017 of 47 dB Leq would translate to a CNEL of about 50 dB. Further south, across from the baseball field, noise levels at Meter 2 were less than 53 dB CNEL in 2013 and adjusting the 2017 short-term measurement to a CNEL would yield almost the same results. Along Vista Montana closer to La Pata Avenue, noise levels at Meter 4 were approximately 57 dB CNEL. Nevertheless, all these readings demonstrate that existing noise levels are well within the City's compatibility thresholds for religious facility noise/land use, even closest to travel routes (School Access Road and Stallion Ridge). The combined effects of existing traffic noise as well as student activity are well within "conditionally acceptable" compatibility criteria and likely within the "normally acceptable" range and do not pose a noise constraint for the proposed use. Standards of Significance Noise impacts are considered significant if they expose persons to levels in excess of standards established in local general plans or noise ordinances. The exterior noise standard for the City of San Juan Capistrano for sensitive uses is 65 dBA CNEL in usable outdoor space. If required, attenuation through setback and project perimeter barriers is anticipated to be used to reduce traffic noise to the 65 dBA CNEL goal. However, an inability to achieve this goal through the application of reasonably available mitigation measures would be considered a significant impact. Impacts may also be significant if they create either a substantial permanent or temporary increase. The term "substantial" is not quantified in CEQA guidelines. In most environmental analyses, "substantial" is taken to mean a level that is clearly perceptible to humans. In practice, this is at least a 3 dB increase. Some agencies, such as Cal trans, require substantial increases to be + 10 dB or more if noise standards are not exceeded by the increase. For purposes of this analysis, a 3 dB increase is considered a substantial increase. The following noise impacts due to project-related traffic would be considered significant: 1. If construction activities were to audibly intrude into adjacent uses south of the site or educational activities west of the site during periods of heightened noise sensitivity. 2. If project traffic noise were to cause an increase by a perceptible amount ( +3 dB CNEL) or expose receivers to levels exceeding City of San Juan Capistrano compatibility noise standards. 3. If future cumulative build-out noise levels were to expose sensitive receivers to levels exceeding City of San Juan Capistrano compatibility standards of 65 dB CNEL exterior at any outdoor uses or 45 dB CNEL interior noise levels in any habitable space. Vibration Standards Vibration is like noise in that it involves a source, a transmission path, and a receiver. While vibration is related to noise, it differs in that noise is generally considered to be pressure waves transmitted through air, whereas vibration usually consists of the excitation of a structure or surface. As with noise, vibration consists of an amplitude and frequency. A person's perception to the vibration will depend on their individual sensitivity to vibration, as well as the amplitude and frequency of the source and the response of the system which is vibrating. Vibration can be measured in terms of acceleration, velocity, or displacement. A common practice is to monitor vibration measures in terms of peak particle velocities in inches per second. Standards pertaining to perception as well as damage to structures have been L PAGB85 INITIAL STUDY CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT developed for vibration levels defined in terms of peak particle velocities. The City of San Juan Capistrano does not have specific policies pertaining to vibration levels. However, vibration levels associated with construction activities are addressed as potential noise impacts associated with project implementation. Human and structural response to differen t vibration levels is influenced by a number of factors, including ground type, distance between source and receptor, duration, and the number of perceived vibration events. The threshold for damage to structures ranges from 0.2 to 0.6 peak particle velocity in inches per second (in/sec p.p.v). The general threshold at which human annoyance could occur is notes as 0.1 in/sec p.p.v. Responses to Checklist Questions Responses a, c): Vehicular Noise Impacts Long-term noise concerns from the increased urbanization of the project area center primarily on mobile source emissions surrounding the project site. These concerns were addressed using the California specific vehicle noise curves (CALVENO) in the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) noise prediction model (FHWA-RD-77-108) in a computerized version of the model developed by Caltrans. The model calculates the LE Q noise level for a particular reference set of input conditions, a nd t h en makes a series of adjustments for s ite-specific traffic volumes, distances, speeds, or noise barriers. Tables 13 and 14 summarize the 24-hour CNEL level at SO feet from the roadway centerline along area roadway segments. Four traffic scenarios were evaluated: "Existing", "Existing Plus Project", "Opening Year (2017) No Project" and "Opening Year (2017) Plus Project". The noise analysis utilized data from the traffic analysis prepared for the proposed project by KOA Corporation in June 2016. Table l :t Weekday Traffic tyoise_j mpact Analysis (dB CNEL at 50 Feet From Centerline) Existing Existing 2017 2017 Segment No Plus No Plus Project Project Project Project Del Obispo-Avenida Los Cerritos 70.6 70.6 70.7 70.7 Ortega Hwy. Avenida Los Cerritos-Rancho Viejo Rd. 71.7 71.7 71.8 71.8 Rancho Viejo Rd-La Novia Ave. 72.4 72.4 72.5 72.5 La Novia-La Pata Ave . 73.3 73.3 73.3 73.3 La PataAve. Ortega Hwy.-School Access Rd. 70.2 70.3 70.3 70.4 School Access Rd. La Pata Ave.-Vista Montana 52.5 53.0 52.5 53.0 Vista Montana School Access Rd to La Pat a Av e . 65.4 65.6 65.5 65.6 West of School Access Rd. 64.5 64.5 64.6 64.6 SOURCE: GIROUX & ASSOCIATES, 2017. [ PA'GE86 CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT INITIAL STUDY Table 14: Weekday Project Only Impact (dB CNEL at 50 Feet From Centerline) Segment Del Obispo-Avenida Los Cerritos Ortega Hwy. Avenida Los Cerritos-Rancho Viejo Rd. Rancho Viejo Rd-La Novia Ave. La Novia-La Pata Ave. La PataAve. Orte_g_a Hwy.-School Access Rd. School Access Rd. La Pata Ave.-Vista Montana Vista Montana School Access Rd to La Pata Ave. West of School Access Rd. NOTE: *OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT' MINUS "EXISTING YEAR NO PROJECT" SOURCE: GIROUX & ASSOCIATES, 2017. Project Project Cumulative Only Only Impacts* Existing Existing 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Traffic attributed to the proposed project would only slightly increase the total traffic traveling along the major thoroughfares within the project vicinity because of the small amount of weekday trips generated by the project. The project would generate lS 1 new daily trips on weekdays and 607 new daily trips on weekends. Elevated non-project traffic levels on area roadways will substantially mask any small project noise contribution. As seen in Table 14, no "detectable" project-related noise increases will occur on any analyzed roadway segment. The largest weekday project impact is on School Access Road, but this increase is only +O.S dB which is below the threshold of perception. Cumulative impacts are defined as the difference between the "future with project and other area development" scenario and "existing" noise levels. The largest cumulative impact is +0.6 dB CNEL, which would also occur on School Access Road. This cumulative increase in noise levels would be below the threshold of perception. On weekends, the project will generate 607 new daily trips; however, the adjacent high school would typically be closed on weekends. The only uses that could be negatively impacted by the weekend trips are the homes south of Stallion Ridge offVia Zamora Road. The project report provides the following weekend hourly peak vehicle volumes which would create the indicated Sunday morning peak hour noise increase: 'f, bl 15 Cl . N . L I a e : 1angern 01se eves Segment No Project Peak Plus Project Peak Change Hour Volume Hour Volume in Noise Vista Montana I West of School Access Rd. 272 276 +0.1 dB Vista Montana I School Access Rd. to La Pata Ave. 278 458 +2.2 dB La Pata Ave./_ South of Vista Montana 144 144 +0 .0 dB La Pata Ave./North of Vista Montana 407 660 +2.1 dB SOURCE: GIROUX & ASSOCIATES, 2017. During the peak weekend hour, project traffic could create up to a +2.2 dB hourly increase at SO feet from the roadway centerline. The remaining weekend hours will have a much lesser impact. Regardless, all the homes located south of the project site are at least 100 feet from the Stallion Ridge centerline. This would attenuate noise levels by 4.S dB due to distance. Thus, the peak hour traffic noise level of 62.S dB at SO feet from centerline would be reduced to 58 dB at the closest property line south of Stallion Ridge. These increases [ PAG1!87 J JNJ'I'IALSTUDY CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT would most likely not be audible at the adjacent homes and are much less than the +3.0 dB significance threshold or the 65 dB CNEL compatibility recommendation. Because the noise/land use compatibility standards are based upon the weighted 24-hour CNEL metric, whereas peak traffic noise resulting from the proposed project would occur during single site access and departure hours, changes to CNEL levels seen in Tables 15 and 16 would be negligible. On-Site Noise Sources Operation of the proposed project is not considered a potentially significant noise generator. The closest residential sensitive receptor is approximately 450 feet south of the proposed church building. It is noted that the proposed parking lot is setback even farther from the nearest residence. Parking lot activities will be sporadic with a peak on Sundays. According to the project traffic report, the Sunday peak hour traffic volume would be 200 vehicles (100 inbound and 100 outbound). Th e r e ference noise level at SO feet for 200 vehicles with a 25 miles per hour (mph) travel speed is 53 dB Leq· At 400 feet, this noise level is attenuated to 39 dB Leq· This is less than the City daytime noise standard of 65 dB for 30 minutes. The outdoor pavilion would be used for congregational picnics with under 75 adults and children, and smaller youth gatherings such as Cub Scout Troop activities, or other similar teen discussions. The aforementioned congregational picnics and other youth activities would occur on a few occasions during the year, usually on Tuesday or Wednesday evenings. Events for elementary school aged children would occur between 4 :00 PM and 6:30 PM, and events for youth and/or adults would occur between 7:00PM and 8:30 PM. The outdoor pavilion area is not anticipated to host concerts or other similar events which would attract large crowds or would require amplified music. The congregation activities with 75 or fewer attendees would occur once or twice a year on a Saturday afternoon. Because the pavilion would be located north of the proposed church building, separation distance and the intervening church building would attenuate possible pavilion noise at the closest residential area south of the project site. The pavilion would be located near the proposed bio-retention basin, which is over 100 feet from the adjacent high school. Because of the distance to the nearest off-site sensitive receptor as well as probable low parking lot traffic speed, it is improbable that any potential noise nuisance would result. Additionally, none of the limited pavilion activities would result in significant noise generators. Noise associated with the proposed church operations would be sufficiently below the noise baseline. Because the majority of the church services would be conducted during day time hours and held indoors, no disturbance during noise sensitive sleeping hours would occur. It is not anticipated that adjacent sensitive uses will notice any change in the noise environment. Because the adjacent high school is closed on weekends, there would be no disruption to operations at the school. On-Site Noise Exposure The proposed project includes addition of devotional space. Exterior noise standards for church and school use are ideally less than 60 dB CNEL, though less than 65 dB is considered "conditionally acceptable". PAGR81l CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT INITIAL STUDY The major noise source potentially affecting the proposed church would be traffic from La Pata Avenue. The closest new sanctuary fa~;ade is 380 feet to the La Pata Avenue centerline. At this distance, the 70 dB CNEL noise level at 50 feet would be attenuated to 56 dB CNEL. Noise reductions of 25 to 30 dB is normally attainable with closed, dual-paned windows in newer construction or modular buildings. This would reduce any traffic-related CNEL to below 26 to 31 dB CNEL for interior use in any proposed rooms facing La Pata Avenue. Therefore, there are no existing or future noise constraints relative to City of San juan Capistrano noise standards for the proposed project. Conclusion Project-related traffic will have a less then significant impact on sensitive receptors. Project- related traffic or cumulative development will not cause noise standards to be exceeded, nor make any existing noise levels measurably worse. Maximum on-site traffic and parking activities during peak weekend traffic hour use will not exceed significance criteria at the nearest residential property line. Surrounding perimeter roadways do not pose a development constraint for project development as proposed. Consequently, the project would result in a less than significant impact relative to this topic. Response b): Typical background vibration levels in residential areas are usually 50 vibration decibels (VdB) or lower, below the threshold of human perception. Perceptible vibration levels inside residences are typically attributed to the operation of heating and air conditioning systems, door slams, or street traffic. Construction activities and street traffic are some of the most common external sources of vibration that can be perceptible inside vibration sensitive uses. Construction activities generate groundborne vibration when heavy equipment travels over unpaved surfaces or when it is engaged in soil movement. The effects of ground borne vibration include discernable movement of building floors, rattling of windows, shaking of items on shelves or hanging on walls, and rumbling sounds. Vibration related problems generally occur due to resonances in the structural components of a building because structures amplify ground borne vibration. Within the "soft" sedimentary surfaces of much of Southern California, ground vibration is quickly damped out. Groundborne vibration is almost never annoying to people who are outdoors in the region (FTA 2006). Groundborne vibrations from construction activities rarely reach levels that can damage structures. Because vibration is typically not an issue, very few jurisdictions have adopted vibration significance thresholds. Vibration is most commonly expressed in terms of the root mean square (RMS) velocity of a vibrating object. RMS velocities are expressed in units of vibration decibels. The range ofVdB is as follows: • 65 VdB: threshold of human perception • 72 VdB: annoyance due to frequent events • 80 VdB: annoyance due to infrequent events • 94-98 VdB: minor cosmetic damage BAGH89 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT To determine potential impacts of the project's construction activities, estimates of vibration levels induced by the construction equipment at various distances are presented below: Table 16: Vibration Levels for Vatying Construction Equipment Approximate Vibration Levels (VdB) Equipment 25 feet 50 feet 100 feet 200/eet 400feet Large Bulldozer 87 81 75 69 63 Loaded Truck 86 80 74 68 62 Jackhammer 79 73 67 61 55 Small Bulldozer 58 52 46 40 34 SOURCE: FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION, TRANSIT NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES, MAY 2006 The on-site construction equipment that will create the maximum potential vibration is a large bulldozer. The stated vibration source level in the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Handbook for such equipment is 81 VdB at SO feet from the source. With typical vibration energy spreading loss, the annoyance threshold of 80 VdB is met at 56 feet. High school recreational uses are closest to the project site, but, as noted above, groundborne vibration is almost never annoying to people who are outdoors. Any vibration perception such as rattling windows would only occur in classrooms. The closest classrooms at the school are more than 400 feet from any of the proposed major grading areas. At this distance, vibration levels decay to 63 VdB, which is less than the threshold of perception. Therefore, construction vibrations are not predicted to cause damage to existing buildings or cause annoyance to sensitive receptors. This impact would be considered less than significant. Response d): Temporary construction noise impacts will vary markedly because the noise strength of construction equipment ranges widely as a function of the equipment used and its activity level. Short-term construction noise impacts tend to occur in discrete phases dominated initially by demolition of existing structures and large earth-moving sources, then by foundation and parking lot construction, and finally for finish construction. The earth-moving sources are the noisiest, with equipment noise typically ranging from 75 to 90 dBA at 50 feet from the source. Table 17 shows the range of noise emissions for various pieces of construction equipment. Point sources of noise emissions are attenuated by a factor of 6 dB per doubling of distance through geometrical (spherical) spreading of sound waves. The quieter noise sources will drop to a 65 dBA exterior f 45 dB A interior noise level by about 200 feet from the source while the loudest may require over 1,000 feet from the source to reduce the 90+ dBA peak source strength to a generally acceptable 65 dBA exterior exposure level. This estimate assumes a clear line-of-sight from the source to the receiver. The sustained average noise level over any averaging period is usually considerably lower because of variable power levels and equipment mobility. The hourly average noise level is typically measured at 80 dBA near any semi- stationary heavy equipment. Variations in terrain elevation or existing structures will also act as noise barriers that may interrupt equipment noise propagation. Construction noise impacts are, therefore, somewhat less than that predicted under idealized input conditions According to the City of San Juan Capistrano Municipal Code, permissible hours of construction are 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. on weekdays and on 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on Saturdays. Construction is not permitted on any national holiday or on any Sunday. Although the noise ordinance does not specifically identity school uses as meriting construction noise protection, heavy equipment noise may be intrusive into indoor learning and outdoor recreational use. The construction activities may occur as close as 480 feet to the nearest classroom. Peak noise levels at 90 dB at PAGE"90 CHURCH OF )ESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT INITIAl. STUDY SO feet will be reduced to 70 dB at the nearest classroom fa~ade. Student outdoor assembly areas at the high school occur within a sheltered courtyard located even farther from planned construction. The outdoor assembly areas area also separated from the project site by the school building itself. Any possible construction activity noise constraint would be to the interior instructional environment. Because the classrooms are air conditioned, the structural attenuation of rooms with heavy duty plate windows is 30 dB or more. A typical indoor classroom hourly noise level is 55 dBl. Project construction activities would cause indoor classroom noise levels of 40 dB or less, which would not be considered intrusive. Table 17: Typical Construction Equipment Noise Generation Levels Construction Equipment NOISE LEVEL (dBA) AT 50 FEET (!~ 70 7? 80 85 90 '15 100 11,15 Compactors (Rollers) - Front Loaders Backhoes II f ·I Tracto rs &! i I Scrapers, Graders Pavers Trucks -(;.I 1 ! f Concrete Mixers !' i Concrete Pumps -1 Cranes (Movable) l I Cranes (Derrick) - Pumps • • ~ I Generators .I Compressors Pneumatic Wrenches ~ Jack Hammers and Rock Drills P ile Drivers (Peaks) M Vibrator Saws SOURCE: FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION, TRANSIT NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPAcr ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES, MAY 2006 1 Fitzroy & Reed, 1963: 53 dB 15-room high school, no specific activity; Yerges, 1976: 55 dB 5 primary classrooms, "normal" activity; Airey, 1995 57 dB 14 room primary, "pupils silent" PAGE91 JNITIALSiiJD¥ CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT The high school baseball field and tennis courts are located within a zone of possible construction noise impact. The tennis courts are as close as 120 feet from the edge of the project site. Third base at the baseball field is approximately 250 feet away from the site. The portion of the site closest to the tennis courts is a steep hill that has already been contour- graded. The closest point of site grading near the tennis courts is also around 250 feet from physical education or tennis practice activities. At 250 feet, the hourly average equipment noise level would be 66 dB under direct line of sight (80 dB at SO feet minus 14 dB distance spreading loss). An outdoor noise level of 70 dB is considered by the EPA to be excessive for active outdoor recreational uses. At 66 dB, the noise may be audible, but will not substantially interfere with activities where players, coaches, or spectators often raise their voices themselves at well above equipment noise levels. Therefore, construction noise levels are not predicted to cause annoyance to sensitive receptors. This impact would be considered less than significant. Response e, f): The project site is located within an airport land use plan and, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport. The closest airstrip is the John Wayne Ai r po r t, located approximately 18.5 miles northwest of the project site. According to the Orange County ALUC Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport, the project site is not located within any of the safety zones. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would result in no impact relative to this topic. L P.AGE92 J Project Boundary Noise Monitoring Locations• • 24-hour readings t /15-1/ltJ/2013 .~UHrU'5 Cumn ct Asw(lates Orange Cmmn: ·!Jr(iJS On/tn( ff(!1/dlnwge1:1 \·fOJ!SCI\Ur llapdcuf l{(!\ .:5 .?017 50 100 W-.l....L..J FeeT 1 3 000 CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT IS/MND Figure 17. Noise Monitoring Locations lNITIALSniDY CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LA TIER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT This page left intentionally blank. PAGB94 ......_ __ CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT (NJTIALS'11UDY XIII. POPULATION AND HOUSING 'Ph ttll.l ttuli!V Less 1'fl lln :liqJ ~ 71lu.m WtmlrJ 'the J!f!(ljtrot: Nlrfnifl~cmt '$fgJJl!)~I!Wit lll~f . !1/g r~lfle.ant /l/0 MJ I/g cttlttl1 tlm pliiC!t lmpatt.t ln_cor:voroUon 1/ittpo ot a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, X through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of X replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement X housing elsewhere? Responses to Checklist Questions Response a): According to the 2015 US Census population estimates, the population in San Juan Capistrano is 36,454 people. Additionally, the average persons per household is 3.02. The proposed project would not result in the construction of residential housing that would generate new population within the area. The users of the proposed development may come from San Juan Capistrano or surrounding communities. The proposed project would not include upsizing of offsite infrastructure or roadways. The installation and sizing of new infrastructure would be limited to the proposed uses. Implementation of the proposed project would not induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly or indirectly. Implementation of the proposed project would have a less than significant impact relative to this topic. Responses b), c): The project site currently undeveloped and does not contain housing. The proposed project would not displace housing or people. Implementation of the proposed project would have no impact relative to this topic. PAG£95 CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES Potentially L.essThan Less Than Significant with No S{gnijlcant Mitigation SI.!Jntncant Impact Impact lnco,ooratlon Impact a) Would t he pr ojec t r esult in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts , in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? Police protection? Schools? Parks? Other public facilities? Responses to Checklist Questions Response a): Fire Protection X X X X X Fire protection services and facilities in the City of San Juan Capistrano are provided and maintained through a contract with the OCFA. Fire protection service is essential to the safety of the residents in the City, especially with the threat of wildfires. Services provided by the OCFA include structural fire protection, emergency medical and rescue services, hazardous inspections and response, and public education activities. OCFA also participates in disaster planning as it relates to emergency operations, which includes high occupant areas and school sites; and the agency may participate in community disaster drills planned by others. Since fire protection is provided under contract, the City must be involved in close coordination with the OCFA to ensure that appropriate levels of service are provided to the community. Orange County Fire Station #56, which is located at 56 Sendero Way, is the nearest fire station to the project site (1.9 miles north). Additionally, Fire Station #7, which is located at 31865 Del Obispo, serves the City of San Juan Capistrano. This station is located approximately 2.3 miles west of the project site. At the present time, the OCFA Board of Directors has adopted a response time standard intended to maintain adequate levels of service. That standard requires that the first unit must be on-scene from receipt within seven minutes and 20 seconds 80 percent of the time. OCFA has assigned a 12-minute response for a full first alarm assignment (i.e., three engines, one truck, one medic, and one chief) 80 percent of the time; the first unit equates to a five-minute drive time. In 2015, the OCFA responded to 6,862 incidents in San Juan Capistrano. Additionally, the actual total response time for the City during 2012 at the 90th percentile was approximately eight minutes and 49 seconds. The OCFA's independent Insurance Services Office (ISO) rating (a rating which can be used to assess the effectiveness of fire protection services) varies by community. The OCFA is divided into six ISO regions and rating areas (OC Central, East, North, South, and West and Santa Ana). The project site is located in the South region. The South region has a Class 3 rating. The majority of the populated areas of OCFA have a Class 3 rating. A portion of the Eastern Region is a Class 4 rating. The canyon areas and Cleveland National Forest are rated a class 9. The City expands fire protection services as growth and development PAGE96 ] CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT occurs to meet the adopted fire response time as a general guideline. (General Plan Policies 2.1, and 2.2 [Public Services & Utilities Element], and Policy 1.1 [Growth Management Element]. Funding for fire operations and services is derived from a combination of development impact fees and the City's General Fund. Development impact fees are paid prior to construction and are typically used to fund new facilities and equipment, while the General Fund (revenues from property tax and sales tax) is typically used to fund ongoing fire operations. The proposed project would not result in a need to construct a new fire station or physically alter an existing fire station. As previously stated, the OCFA would receive development impact fees for capital improvements and infrastructure costs even though a new facility would not be created. The fair share funds are intended to pay for project financial impacts on fire protection service. The proposed project's environmental impact to fire service is considered less than significant. Police Protection The City of San Juan Capistrano has been contracting its primary law enforcement services from the OCSD since 1961. The OCSD, which maintains facilities in the existing Dance Hall building at 32400 Paseo Adelanto and at the Aliso Viejo substation, provides 24-hour contract law enforcement services to the City. At the present time, the OCSD maintains a ratio of 1 sworn office for each 1,100 residents in the City. A total of 28 OCSD personnel are assigned to the City of San Juan Capistrano, including one lieutenant, four sergeants, two investigators, 21 deputies, and two community service officers. The City's staffing level is based on response times and crime rates determined to be adequate for the City. Law enforcement in the City is provided by units that patrol San Juan Capistrano during designated shifts. In 2010, the OCSD emergency response time for Priority 1 calls in San Juan Capistrano was 3.47 minutes. The emergency response times for Priority 2 calls was 6.76 minutes. Service provided includes staffing for calls for service, preventive patrol, traffic enforcement, general and traffic investigation, and specialized enforcement, which includes a Red Light Camera system deputy, school resource office, motor deputies, and a regional directed enforcement deputy. Sheriffs regional and departmental services are also supplied to the City, which include homicide, sex, and economic crime investigations. Special weapons and tactics (SWAT), Hostage Negotiations, and Reserve supplement, and many other services are also available to the City from OCSD. The department maintains mutual aid agreements with surrounding contracted Sheriffs cities. On major planned or emergency events, outlying cities will supply manpower and resources to assist. Depending on the event, reimbursement may be necessitated to the contributing agency. City, County, and State mutual aid agreements exist for a variety of situations. The City expands police protection service consistent with community needs and provides an adequate level of service based on demand (General Plan Public Services & Utilities Goal 1, Policy 1.1, and Policy 1.2). The on-going operations of the OCSD is funded primarily from the City's General Fund, which receives revenue from property taxes, transit taxes, fees, and other sources. Typically, the City would use a part of this additional revenue to increase police staffing, as needed. In addition to the operational funding for police services, the City requires each development to pay development impact fees for police services prior to construction. These fees are used to fund the direct impact on increased demand for police facilities and equipment. The proposed project would not result in a need to construct a new policy station or physically alter an existing police station. As previously stated, the development impact fees for capital PAGB97 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LA TIER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT improvements and infrastructure costs would be collected even though a new facility would not be created. The fair share funds are intended to pay for project financial impacts on police protection service. The proposed project's environmental impact to police service is considered less than significant. Schools The provision of education and school facilities in the City is the responsibility of the Capistrano Unified School District (CUSD), which is the second largest school district in Orange County, encompassing 195 square miles. The CUSD includes all or part of the following cities and communities: Aliso Viejo, Dana Point, Laguna Niguel, Mission Viejo, Rancho Santa Margarita, San Clemente, San Juan Capistrano, Coto de Caza, Dove Canyon, Ladera Ranch, Las Flores, and Wagon Wheel. The CUSD currently (2017) operates 33 K-6 schools, two K-8 schools, 10 middle schools, seven high schools, two alternative education programs, and two exceptional needs facilities. Elementary schools located in the City of San Juan Capistrano, include Del Obispo, Harold Ambuehl , Kinoshita, and San Juan Elementary Schools. Secondary schools in the City include Marco Forster Middle School, J. Serra, California Preparatory Academy, and San Juan Hills High School. The CUSD is governed by a seven-member Board of Trustees. Since 1991, the CUSD's student population has grown by approximately 29,000 students; the CUSD has opened 31 new schools in the 17-year period since 1991. The most recent addition to the CUSD's facilities is San Juan Hills High School, which was complete d and op e n e d in September 2007. As of 2016-2017, the CUSD accommodated a total of 53,613 students, which accounted for approximately 11 percent of the total public school enrollment in the County. According to the CUSD, approximately 60 percent of the students attending schools in the CUSD are housed in permanent school facilities; the remaining 40 percent of the students are housed in interim facilities. The average cost of school facilities required to house students generated from new development is estimated to be $53,041.33 per student based on the 2010 School Facilities Needs Analysis prepared by the CUSD. The CUSD recently adopted a Facilities Master Plan that addresses long-term future needs at each of the District's 56 school campuses. That plan is currently under review by the District and is being updated in order to address current school facility's needs. While the CUSD is currently updating enrollment data, enrollment continues to exceed District capacity. Funding for new school construction is provided through State and local revenue sources. The CUSD does levy school fees on new development in accordance with SB 50. The District currently assesses a Level I developer school fees on new development. However, the developer of the Whispering Hills Estates CDP entered into a Mitigation Agreement at the time the CDP was approved in 2004. As a result, impacts to school facilities caused by development within the Whispering Hills Estates CDP are mitigated under the terms of that mitigation agreement in lieu of the State statutory developer school fees. The proposed project would not result in a need to construct a new school or physically alter an existing school. The proposed project would be subject to the mitigation agreement for the Whispering Hills Estates CDP, which would mitigate the financial impacts of the proposed project on school facilities. The proposed project's environmental impact to schools is considered less than significant. L Pl\GI98 J CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT INI'lUl,.STtJbY Parks Parks and recreation facilities are provided by the City of San Juan Capistrano. City park facilities are operated and maintained by the Community Services Department. The City's parks system consists of existing public and private parks. To ensure that adequate parks and recreational opportunities are available to the residents in San Juan Capistrano, the City has established a parkland standard of five acres for each 1,000 residents, consistent with the Quimby Act. The project would result in the construction of church facilities on the project site. The project would not result in direct population growth ea. The project does not propose to construct any park land within the project site. However, the project does include a multi-purpose room which is intended to be used for private recreational purposes (basketball, volleyball, and dining purposes). The proposed project would not result in a need to construct a new park or physically alter an existing park. The developer will be required to pay park dedication fees, which would serve as an adequate financial offset for park demand. The proposed project's environmental impact to parks is considered less than significant. Other Public Facilities The proposed project would not result in a need for other public facilities that are not addressed above, or in Section XVIII Utilities and Service Systems. Implementation of the proposed project would have no impact relative to this issue. L PAGB99 J INITWI STUDY CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LA ITER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT XV. RECREATION 1/itOfGII /11./il~ {.W$'1flllUJI 'T>e Wllun 'Gfglii/ltWJhtVIflll TV» ,SJgpljlfJllttl Nl'l'Qri(fll"tt lilj}rtf/ltltJIII 1mp1U!J 1inprr~t '/Jt@.r:JU(jf(f/.tli1JJJ turprmt a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical X deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of X recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Responses to Checklist Questions Responses a): The proposed project would not increase the use of existing parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated. Implementation of the proposed project would have no impact relative to this topic. Responses b): The proposed proj e ct does not include the construction of recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. Implementation of the proposed project would have no impact relative to this topic. CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT INmAL STUDY XVI. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC Potentially Less 'l'h,an t:essThan Significant wiUr /Ito 'Wou ld the p;·oject: Slgnlfleonl Mltl![allon Significant Impact. tmn.aot tncoriiorauon Impact a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial X increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county X congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a X change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous X intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? X t) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus X turnouts, bicycle racks)? Background A Traffic Impact Study (January 2017) was prepared by KOA Corporation for the proposed project. Additionally, an Updated Traffic Impacts Assessment (April 2017) was completed in order to update the results of the previous analysis as a result of lane configuration changes at the intersection of Stallion Ridge and La Plata Avenue. An additional through lane was added for southbound traffic. The Updated Traffic Impacts Assessment includes traffic analysis and queuing analysis of this intersection. The following is a summary of the reports, which are contained in Appendix E. Study intersections and roadway links were identified as those that may potentially be impacted by the proposed project. The intersection capacity analysis of potential project traffic impacts examined weekday conditions during the morning (AM -7:00AM to 9:00AM) and afternoon (PM -4:00 PM to 6:00 PM) peak hours and weekend conditions during the midday (MD-6:30AM to 5:00PM) peak hours for a total of nine intersections. The mid-block roadway link analysis includes a total of eight segments. The City of San Juan Capistrano General Plan Circulation Element has identified several "Hot Spot" locations where level of service (LOS) E is considered acceptable with a Hot Spot designation of "Limited Space", "Traffic Operations", or "School". The following 10 study intersections and eight roadway segments have been included in the analysis: [ PAGBtOiJ INmALS'nJDY CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT Project Study Intersections 1. I-5 Southbound (SB) Ramps at Ortega Highway (Traffic Operations Hot Spot) 2. 1-5 Northbound (NB) Ramps at Ortega Highway (Traffic Operations Hot Spot) 3. Rancho Viejo Road at Ortega Highway 4. La Novia Avenue at Ortega Highway 5. La Novia Avenue at Calle Arroyo (School Hot Spot) 6. La Novia Avenue at San Juan Creek Road 7. La Pata Avenue at Ortega Highway 8. La Pata Avenue at Stallion Ridge/Vista Montana o The intersection of Vista Montana at La Plata Avenue is planned to provide a free right-turn lane on the SB approach as part of the La Plata widening project that will be completed in late August 2016. The free right-turn lane was included in the analysis for all scenarios. 9. School Access Road at Vista Montana 10. La Plata Avenue at School Access Road (limited access; SB right-turn only) o Since this intersection currently does not provide left-in or left-out access , and is not planned for future improvements, no additional analysis is conducted for this intersection. Project Roadway Segments 1. Ortega Highway: 1-5 SB Ramps to 1-5 NB Ramps (Traffic Operations Hot Spot) 2. Ortega Highway: I-5 NB Ramps to Rancho Viejo Road 3. Ortega Highway: Rancho Viejo Road to La Novia Avenue 4. Ortega Highway: La Novia Avenue to La Plata Avenue 5. La Plata Avenue: Ortega Highway to Vista Montana 6. Vista Montana: La Plata Avenue to School Access Road 7. Vista Montana: School Access Road to Terminus 8. School Access Road: Vista Montana to La Plata Traffic Analysis Scenarios The study intersections were evaluated for the following four scenarios: • Scenario 1: Existing Conditions -LOS and daily traffic volumes based on existing peak hour volumes and existing intersection configurations. • Scenario 2: Existing Plus Project -Existing traffic volumes plus trips from the proposed project. • Scenario 3: Near-Term (2017) Conditions -This scenario includes cumulative volumes. • Scenario 4: Near-Term (201 7 ) Plus Project Conditions -This scenario includes cumulative volumes plus the trips from the proposed project. Existing Roadway Network The following is a detailed description of the roadways that could be affected by the project: • 1-5 Freeway is located approximately two miles west of the project site (four-mile driving distance). The 1-5 Ortega interchange has recently been reconfigured to include a realignment of the intersection of Del Obispo Street and Ortega Highway and reconfiguration of the 1-5 NB Ramps. • Ortega Highway is a primary arterial (four-lane divided roadway) that extends in the east-west direction, north of the project site. On-street parking is prohibited on both PAGB102 =:J CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT sides of this roadway within the study area, between the I-5 freeway and La Pata Avenue. The posted speed limit on Ortega Highway 12 35 miles per hour (mph) from I-5 to Rancho Viejo Road, 40 mph from Rancho Viejo Road to Avenida Victoria/Via Cuartel, and 45 mph from Avenida Victoria/Via Cuartel to La Plata Avenue. The study intersections of Ortega Highway at I-5 SB Ramps, I-5 NB Ramps, Rancho Viejo Road, La Novia Avenue, and La Plata Avenue are controlled by traffic signals. • Rancho Viejo Road is designated as a commuter collector south of Ortega Highway, and as a secondary arterial north of Ortega Highway. However, it is constructed as a primary arterial (four-lane, divided roadway) that extends in the north-south direction. Parking is not permitted on either side of this roadway. The posted speed limit on Rancho Viejo Road is 30 mph. • La Novia Avenue is a primary arterial (four-lane, divided roadway) between Ortega Highway and San Juan Creek Road. On-street parking is permitted along segments of the east side of La Novia Avenue, south of Ortega Highway. The posted speed limit on La Novia Avenue is 35 mph. • La Pata Avenue is designated as a primary arterial (four-lane, divided roadway) south of Ortega Highway, and as a major arterial north of Ortega Highway. Parking is not permitted on either side of this roadway. The posted speed limit on La Pata Avenue is 55 mph. • Vista Montana is designated as a commuter street. However, it is constructed as a secondary arterial (four-lane, divided roadway) that extends in the west direction from La Pata Avenue and terminates at San Juan Hills High School. Parking is not permitted on either side of this roadway. The posted speed limit on Vista Montana is 40 mph. the proposed project will provide a right-in and right-out only driveway along this roadway. • School Access Road is a two-lane roadway that extends from La Pata Avenue to Vista Montana, along the west side of the project site. It provides access to the project site and the San Juan Hills High School with a SB right-turn lane at La Pata Avenue. This roadway is stop-controlled at Vista Montana. The proposed project will provide two full access driveways along this roadway. There are no SB left-turn movements permitted from School Access Road onto Vista Montana during the morning and afternoon hour due to the high eastbound and westbound school traffic. Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Methodology for Intersections The Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology has been used for the analysis and evaluation of traffic capacity at signalized intersections. The ICU method estimates the volume- to-capacity (V /C) relationship to an intersection based on the individual V /C ratios for key conflicting traffic movements. The ICU numerical values represent the percent signal green time, and thus capacity, required by traffic. Using the ICU procedures, a determination can be made of the operating characteristics of an intersection in terms of LOS for different levels of traffic volumes and other variables, such as critical signal phases and the number and type of traffic lanes. The Traffix computer software has been used for the analysis. A lane capacity of 1,600 vehicles per lane (vpl) with a five percent yellow clearance per cycle was used in the analysis. The operational performance of the roadway network is commonly described with the term LOS. LOS is a qualitative description of operating conditions, ranging from LOS A (free-flow traffic conditions with little or no delay) to LOS F (oversaturated conditions where traffic flows exceed design capacity, resulting in long queues and delays). Table 18 summarizes the relationship between LOS and ICU V /C ratio for intersections. [ PAGE103 :J CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT According to the City of San Juan Capistrano criteria, LOS "D" is the mm1mum acceptable condition that should be maintained during the morning and evening peak hours. LOS "E" is the minimum acceptable conditions at locations identified with a "Hot Spot" designation. Table 18: LOS as a Function of JCU Values for Intersections LOS Description (for Signalized Intersections) RangeofiCU Values A Operations with very low delay occurring with favorable traffic signal 0.00-0.600 progression and/or short cycle lengths. B Operations with low delay occurring with good progression and/or short 0.601-0.700 cycle lengths. c Operations with average delays resulting from fair progression and/or longer 0. 701-0.800 cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures begin to appear. Operations with longer delays due to a combination of unfavorable D progression, long cycle lengths, or high V /C ratios. Many vehicles stop and 0.801-0.900 individual cycle failures are noticeable. Operations with high delay values indicating poor progression, and long cycle E lengths. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. This is considered 0.901-1.000 to be the limit of acceptable delay. F Operations with delays unacceptable to most drivers occurring due to over-1.001 and up saturation, poor progression, or very long cycle lengths. SOURCE: KOA CORPORATION, 2017. Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Methodology for Intersections In addition to the ICU method, all signalized and unsignalized intersections are required to be analyzed using the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) method. HCM is also the methodology Caltrans recommends using for the State Transportation Facilities. The analysis results include average vehicle delays for lanes/approaches and expected vehicle queue lengths. The LOS is based on the estimated vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle for the control turning movement or approach of an intersection. Total delay is defined as the time elapsed between when a vehicle stops at the end of a queue and when the vehicle departs from the stop line. Traffic software performs computerized transportation analyses that model (replicate) travel behavior for measured or projected traffic volumes. A lane capacity of 1,600 vpl with a lost time of four-second per signal phase was used in the analysis, which is consistent with current yellow-time standards. A description of the different LOS and their corresponding HCM average vehicul a r delays is shown in Table 19. P~GE 104 CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT (NI'I'IALSTUDY Table 19: LOS as a Function of Vehicle Delay {or Intersections LOS HCM Delay Values (seconds) Signalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection A 0.0-10.0 0.0-10.0 8 10.1-20.0 10.1-15.0 c 20.1-35.0 15.1-25.0 D 35.01-55.0 25.1-35.0 E 55.1-80.0 35.1-50.0 F 80.1 or more 50.1 or more SOURCE: KOA CORPORATION, 2017. Daily Volume-to-Capacity (V /C) Ratio Methodology for Roadway Links All mid-block roadway s egments are required to be evaluated us ing the daily V fC analysis method. The daily V fC relationship is used to estimate the LOW of the roadway segments with the volume based on the 24-hour traffic volume and the roadway classification. The roadway link capacity in vehicles per day (vpd) of each street classification according to the Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) is presented in Table 20 with corresponding LOS and V fC ratios. The Peak Hour Link Capacity is based on 10 percent of the daily link capacity in vehicles per hour (vph). According to the City of San Juan Capistrano criteria, LOS "D" is the m1mmum link LOS performance goal for primary, secondary, and limited secondary arterials. LOS "C" is the performance goal for local residential arterials. LOS "E" is the minimum acceptable conditions at locations identified with a "Hot Spot" designation. Table 20: LOS as a Function of Roadway Link Capadties Facility Number of LOS Roadway Capadty1 (vpd) Peak Hour Capadty2 Type Lanes A B c D E F (vph) Major 6-Lane 33,900 39,400 45,000 50,600 56,300 5,630 Divided - Primary 4-Lane 22 ,500 26,300 30,000 33 ,800 3 7,500 3,750 Divided - Secondary 4-Unane 15,000 17,500 20,000 22,500 25,000 2,500 Divided - Limited 2-Lane 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 20 ,000 2,000 Secondary Divided - Local 2-Lane 7,500 8,800 10,000 11,3000 12,500 1,250 Arterial Undivided - V/C Ratio ::>0 .600 0.601-0.701-0.801-0.901-~1.001 0.700 0.800 0.900 1.000 - NOTES: VPD =VEHICLES PER DAY; VPH =VEHICLES PER HOUR . 1 SoURCES: GUIDANCE FOR ADMINISTRATION OF THE ORANGE COUNTY MASTER PLAN OF ARTERIAL HIGHWAYs; CITY OF SAN JUA N CA PISTR ANO GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT. 2 PEAK HOUR CAPACITY BASED ON 10% OF DAILY LOS f CAPACITY. SOURCE: KOA CORPORATION, 2017. PAGE105 CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT Peak Hour Volume-to-Capacity (V /C) Ratio Methodology for Roadway Links In addition to the Daily V /C method of analysis, the roadway segments that are impacted utilizing the Daily V /C method are required to be analyzed using the Peak Hour V /C method to confirm the project's impact. The peak hour operating conditions for the key impacted roadway links have been evaluated according to the peak hour capacities of the roadway. If the daily roadway V /C ratio results in adverse service levels, a peak hour link analysis is conducted to determine if the roadway operates at satisfactory levels in the critical AM and PM peak hours. Intersection Performance Impact Criteria The City of San Juan Capistrano defines a significant traffic impact in the Administrative Policy 310 (City of San Juan Capistrano, April 4, 1998). According to City policy, a significant "project impact" is identified as an increase in the ICU value, due to project-related traffic, of 0.010 or more when the "Plus Project" conditions LOS is E or F. No significant project impacts are deemed to occur at LOS A, B, C, or D. For HCM analysis method, the City policy specifies a significant "project impact" as an increase in the HCM value, due to project-related traffic, of 1.0 second delay per vehicle or more when the "Plus Project" conditions LOS is F. No significant project impacts are deemed to occur at LOS A, 8, C, D, orE, as LOS E is acceptable at "Hot Spot" locations. For "Hot Spot" intersection locations, LOS E is acceptable. A significant "project impact" is identified as an increase in the ICU value, due to proj e ct-related traffic, of 0.010 or more when the "Plus Project" conditions LOS is F. No significant project impacts are deemed to occur at LOS A, 8, C, D, orE, as LOSE is acceptable at "Hot Spot" locations. For HCM analysis method at "Hot Spot" locations, a significant "project impact" as an increase in the HCM value, due to project-related traffic, of 1.0 second delay per vehicle or more when the "Plus Project" conditions LOS is F. No significant project impacts are deemed to occur at LOS A, 8, C, D, orE, as LOS E is acceptable at "Hot Spot" locations. Roadway Link Performance Impact Criteria According to City policy for primary and secondary arterials, a significant "project impact" is identified as an increase in the V /C ratio, due to project-related traffic, of 0.010 or more when the "Plus Project" conditions LOS is E or G. No significant project impacts are deemed to occur at LOS A, B, C, or D. For local residential arterials where LOS "C" is the performance goal, a significant "project impact" is identified as an increase in the V /C ratio, due to project-related traffic, of 0.010 or more when the "Plus Project" conditions LOS is D, E or F. No significant project imp ac ts are deemed to occur at LOS A, 8, or C. For "Hot Spot" roadway segment locations, LOS E is acceptable. A significant "project impact" is identified as an increase in the V fC ratio, due to project-related traffic, of 0.010 or more when the "Plus Project" conditions LOS is F. No significant project impacts are deemed to occur at LOS A, 8, C, D, orE, as LOS E is acceptable at "Hot Spot" locations. I PAGE 106 CHURCH OF )ESUS CHRIST OF LA ITER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT IN mAL S'MJDY Existing Conditions -Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis Tables 21 and 22 summarize the results of the ICU analysis for Existing (2016) conditions. As shown in Tables 21 and 22, all of the study intersections are currently operating at acceptable LOS. Table 21: ExistinjJ_ Conditions Intersection 0 rJerations Analysis Summary· Weekday ICU2 Method HCM3 Method # Intersection Hot LOS Spot1 Std. IV AM PM AM PM Vj£:3 LOS Vj£:3 LOS Delay4 LOS Delay LOS 1 1-5 SB Ramps at Ho E TS 0.679 B 0.724 c 12.1 B 14.2 B Ortega Highway 2 1-5 NB Ramps at Ho E T S 0.806 D 0.778 c 24.2 c 21.6 c Ortega Highway Rancho Viejo 3 Rd. at Ortega -D TS 0.732 c 0.776 c 14.2 B 15.5 B Highway 4 La Novia Ave. at D TS 0.657 B 0.816 D 9.1 A 14.3 B Ortega Highway - 5 La Novia Ave. at Hs E AWS 45.9 E 19.7 c Calle Arroyo . - - - La Novia Ave. at 6 San juan Creek . D TS 0.695 B 0.523 A 18.6 B 9.5 A Rd. 7 La Pata Ave. at D TS 0.812 D 0.670 B 22.4 c 11.3 B Orte ga Highway - La PataAve. at 8 Stallion Ridge I . D TS 0.400 A 0.200 A 4.1 A 3.3 A Vista Montana School Access 9 Road at Vista -D ows -. --45.2 E 14.1 B Montana NoTEs: 1 "HoT SPOT" CLASSIFICATION WITH MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE LOSE; H 0 =TRAFFIC OPERATIONS; H 5 =SCHOOL. 2 /C =INTERSECTION CONTROL; TS =TRAFFIC SIGNAL; AWS =ALL-WAY STOP; TWS =TWO-WAY STOP; OWS =ONE-WAY STOP (AT ONE APPROACH ONLY). 3 ICU V/C RATIO. 4 HCM DELAY IN SECONDS PER VEHICLE. SOURCE: KOA CORPORATION, 2017. [ PAGE107 CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT T bl 22 E . . C d'. I a e : ·xtstm,q on rtwns ntersectwn 0 1perations A I . S natysts ummary-"W k d ee en ICU2Method HCM3 Method # Intersection Hot LOS IV MD MD Spot1 Std. V/£'3 LOS Delay4 LOS 1 1-5 SB Ramps at Ortega Highway Ho E TS 0.623 B 9.7 A 2 1-5 NB Ramps at Ortega Highway Ho E TS 0.675 B 14.0 B 3 Rancho Viejo Rd. at Ortega Highway -D TS 0.518 A 7.4 A 4 La Novia Ave. at Ortega Highway -D TS 0.571 A 6.8 A 5 La Novia Ave. at Calle Arroyo Hs E AWS --12.5 B 6 La Novia Ave. at San Juan Creek Rd. -D TS 0.396 A 6.6 A 7 La Pata Ave. at Ortega Highway -D TS 0.361 A 5.3 A 8 La Pata Ave . at Stallion Ridge/ Vista Montana -D TS 0.128 A 3.7 A 9 School Access Road at Vista Montana -D ows --9.9 A NOTES : 1 "HoT SPar' ClASSIFICATION WITH MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE LOSE; Ho =TRAFFIC OPERATIONS; H s =SCHOOL. 2 /C =INTERSECTION CONTROL; TS =TRAFFIC SIGNAL; AWS =A LL-WAY STOP; TWS =TWO-WAY STOP; OWS =ONE-WAY STOP (AT ONE APPROACH ONLY). 3 /CU V/C RATIO. 4 HCM DELAY IN SECONDS PER VEHICLE. SOURCE: KOA COR PORATION, 2017. Existing Conditions -Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Analysis Tables 21 and 22 summarize the results of the HCM analysis for Existing (2016) conditions. As shown in Tables 21 and 22, most of the study intersections are currently operating at LOS D or better, based on the HCM method, except for the following location: • Vista Montana at School Access Road -LOSE during AM peak hour. Existing Conditions -Roadway Link Daily Capacity Analysis Table 23 summarize the results of the roadway link capacity analysis for Existing (2016) conditions. As shown in Table 23, most of the roadway links are currently operating at acceptable services, based on the V /C ratio method, except for the following location: • Ortega Highway, La Novia Avenue to La Pata Avenue-LOS E. Transit Service Transit service in San Juan Capistrano consists of the "Orange County Line", the "Inland Empire- Orange County Line", and the "Amtrak Pacific Surfliner" Metrolink Routes, which are operated by Orange County Transportation Authority. All three of these Metrolink Routes arrive and depart from the San Juan Capistrano Station, located at 26701 Verdugo Street in downtown San Juan Capistrano. Additionally, Orange County Transportation Authority Local Route 99 provides local bus service generally following I-5 within the City. Although these routes serve the downtown area and other regions, the routes do not currently extend to the eastern portion of the City, in which the project site is located. PAGE 108 CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT Table 23: Roadway Link Daily Capacity Analysis Summaty # Name Link Street Roadway Existing (2016) Section Capadty1 ADT V/C LOS 1 Ortega Highway 1-5 SB Ramps to 1-5 NB Ramps 6D 56,300 35,240 2 Ortega Highway 1-5 NB Ramps to Rancho Viejo Rd. 6D 56,300 45,347 3 Ortega Highway Rancho Viejo Rd. to La No via Ave. 5D 46,900 38,228 4 Ortega Highway La Novia Ave. to La Pata Ave. 4D 3 7,500 35,141 5 La PataAve. Ortega Highway to Vista Montana 3U 28,300 10,320 6 Vista Montana La Pata Ave. to School Access Road 4D 37,500 7,667 7 Vis ta Montana School Access Road to west terminus 4D 37,500 6,205 8 School Access Road La Pata Av e. to Vista Montana 2U 22,000 1,0 3 9 Nons: 1 RoAD WAY CAPACITIES WERE TAKEN FROM THE OR ANGE COUNTY HIGHWAY DESIGN MANUAL, HIGHWAY CAPACITY VALUES. SOURCE: KOA CORPORATION, 2017. Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities 0.626 0.805 0.815 0.937 0.365 0.204 0 .165 0.047 Class II bike lanes exist along La Pata Avenue and Class I bike lanes exist along Vista Montana. The pedestrian network in the study area includes sidewalks along a majority of residential streets. Vista Montana also feature sidewalks on both sides of the street. Pedestrian facilities do not exist along La Pata Avenue. The Vista Montana I La Pata Avenue intersection has three crosswalks. Responses to Checklist Questions Responses a-b): Project Trip Generation Tables 24 and 25 show the estimated trips generated for the proposed church facility during weekday daily, AM peak hour, and PM peak hour conditions, and weekend MD peak hour conditions. As shown below, the project would generate 151 net daily trips with 9 AM peak hour trips and 9 PM peak hour trips during the weekday and 607 daily trips with 200 MD peak hour trips during the weekend. The trips generated by the church land use is based on trip rates from the Trip Generation Manual (9 th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers 2012). Table 24: Project Tra ffic Generation -Weekday AM Peak Hour Land Use (ITE Code) Unit Daily Trip I I In Out Weekday Trip Ratesz Church (560) TSfl 9.11 o.35 1 o.21 I Weekday Trip Generation Church 16,558 151 6 I 3 I NOTES: 1 TSF = THOUSAND SQUARE FEET. 2 /NSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS (/TE) TRIP GENERATION MANUAL, 9 TH EDITION, 2012. SOURCE: KOA CORPORATION, 2017. PM Peak Hour Total In I Out I Total 0.56 0.26 l 0.29 I 0 .55 9 4 I 5 I 9 B D D E A A A A PAGE 109 J INmALSTUDY CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT Table 25: Project Traffic Generation -Weekend Land Use {ITE Code) Unit Doily Trip Weekend Trip Ratesz Church (560) TSfl 36.63 Weekend Trip Generation Church 16,558 607 NoTEs: 1 TSf =THOUSAND SQUARE FEE T. 2 /NSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS (/TE) TRIP GENERATION MAN UAL, 9 m EDITION, 2012. SOURCE: KOA CORPORATION, 2017. Project Trip Distribution MD Peak Hour In I Out I 5.90 I 6.14 I 98 J 102 I Total 12.04 200 The estimation of geographic distribution for trips for the proposed project uses considered several factors. The primary factors affecting the trip distribution for the project are the nature of the uses; existing traffic patterns; the geographic location of the site and its proximity to freeways and major travel routes; and the relative distribution of the population from which prospective employees and visitors of the project would expect to be drawn. The overall project directional trip distribution was determined based on these factors. There are not SB left-turn movements permitted from School Access Road onto Vista Montana during the morning and afternoon hours due to the high eastbound and westbound school traffic. Therefore, project trips are assigned to make a SB right-turn from School Access Road to travel westbound on Vista Montana to make a left-turn at Via Pamplona to return to Vista Montana and travel towards La Plata Avenue. The trip distribution redirection only applies to the AM project trips and is reflected in the Existing Plus Project and Near-Term Plus Project conditions. Existing Plus Project-Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis Table 26 summarizes the intersection peak hour LOS results at the key study intersections based on the ICU method. The ICU values of Column (1) in Table 26 present a summary of existing AM, PM, and Weekend MD (WE) peak hour traffic conditions. Column (2) lists Existing Plus Project traffic conditions based on existing intersection geometry. Column (3) lists Near- Term (2017) Plus Project traffic conditions based on existing intersection geometry. Column ( 4) shows the change in ICU value due to the addition of project traffic and indicates whether the proposed project will result in a project impact based on the LOS standards and significant impact criteria defined in this section. Table 26 summarizes the results of the ICU analysis for the Existing Plus Project and Near-Term (2017) Plus Project conditions. As shown in Table 26, all of the study intersections are projected to operate at acceptable service levels for the Existing Plus Project condition. This table shows that the project is not expected to result in significant project impacts at any of the study intersections for the Existing Plus Project condition, based on the ICU analysis method. Near-Term (2017) Plus Project-Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis As shown in Table 26, all the study intersections are projected to operate at acceptable service levels for the Near-Term (2017) Plus Project condition. This table shows that the project is not expected to result in significant project impacts at any of the study intersections for the Near- Term (2017) Plus Project condition, based on the JCU analysis method. t PAGE 110 CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT INITIALS'MJDY Table 26: Intersection Analysis and Impact Summary or/CU Method-Weekday and Weekend (3) (2) (1) Existing Plus Near-Term # Intersection Hot LOS Peak Existing Project (2017)Plus Spot1 Std. Hour Project IcrP LOS ICU2 LOS ICU2 AM 0.679 B 0.679 B 0.686 1 I-5 SB Ramps at Ho E PM 0.724 c 0 .724 c 0.731 Ortega Highway WE 0.623 B 0.636 v 0.641 AM 0.806 D 0.807 D 0.814 2 I-5 NB Ramps at Ho E PM 0.778 c 0.779 c 0.786 Ortega Highway WE 0.675 B 0.696 v 0.702 Rancho Viejo AM 0.732 c 0.733 c 0.739 3 Rd. at Ortega . D PM 0.776 c 0.777 c 0.785 Highway WE 0.518 A 0.534 A 0.547 AM 0.657 B 0.659 B 0.665 4 La Novia Ave. at D PM 0.816 D 0.819 D 0 .826 Ortega Highway - WE 0.571 A 0.617 A 0.623 AM . . . - 5 La Novia Ave. at H, ll PM Calle Arroyo -. - WE - -- La Novia Ave. at AM 0 .6 95 B 0.695 B 0.701 6 San Juan Creek -D PM 0 .523 A 0 .523 A 0.528 Rd. WE 0.396 A 0.405 A 0.408 AM 0.812 D 0.814 D 0 .821 7 La Pata Ave. at D PM 0.670 B 0.670 B 0.677 Ortega Highway WE 0.361 A 0.415 A 0 .408 La Pata Ave . at AM 0.400 A 0.401 A 0.405 8 Stallion Ridge / -D PM 0.200 A 0.203 A 0.204 Vista Montana WE 0.128 A 0.162 A 0.163 School Access AM ---- - 9 Road at Vista -D PM . . . -- Montana WE - --. NOTES: AM AND PM SHOW PEAK HOURS DURING WEEKDAYS; WE SHOWS PEAK HOURS DURING WEEKEND . 1 "HoT SPoT" CLASSIFICATION WITH MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE LOSE; H 0 =TRAFFIC OPERATIONS; Hs =SCHOOL. 2 /CU V /C RA T/0. SOURCE: KOA CORPORATION, 2017. Existing Plus Project-Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Analysis LOS B c B D D c c c A B D B - . - c A A D B A A A A . - (4) Significant Impact ICU2 Impact? Change 0.000 No 0.000 No 0.013 No 0.001 No 0.001 No 0.021 No 0.001 No 0.001 No 0.016 No 0.002 No 0.003 No 0.046 No -- - -. 0.000 No 0.000 No 0.009 No 0.002 No 0 .000 No 0.044 No 0.002 No 0 .003 No 0.034 No -- . . . Table 27 summarizes the intersection peak hour LOS results at the key study intersections based on the HCM method. The HCM delay values of Column (1) in Table 27 presents a summary of existing AM, PM, and Weekend MD (WE) peak hour traffic conditions. Column (2) lists Existing Plus Project traffic conditions based on existing intersection geometry. Column (3) lists Near-Term (2017) Plus Project traffic conditions based on existing intersection geometry. Column (4) shows the change in HCM delay values due to the addition of project traffic and indicates whether the proposed project will result in a project impact based on the LOS standards and significant impact criteria defined in this section. PAGE111 J CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LA TIER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT Table 2 7: Intersection Analysis and Impact Summary for HCM Method-Weekdal'_ and Weekend (2) (3) (1) Near-Term Hot LOS Peak Existing Existing Plus (2017)Plus # Intersection Spot1 Std. Hour Project Project HCMZ LOS HCM2 LOS HCM2 LOS AM 12.1 B 12.1 B 12.3 B 1 I-5 SB Ramps a t H, E PM 14.2 B 14.3 B 14.7 B Ortega High w ay WE 9 .7 A 1.0 A 10.2 B AM 24.2 c 24.3 c 2 5.3 c 2 1-5 NB Ramps at H, E PM 21.3 c 21.7 c 22.5 c Ortega Highway WE 14.0 B 15.0 B 15.4 B Rancho Vi e jo AM 14.2 B 14.2 B 14.5 B 3 Rd. at Ortega -D PM 15.5 B 15.5 B 0 .8 c Highway WE 7.4 A 7.6 A 7.8 A AM 9.1 A 9.1 A 9.3 A 4 La Novia Ave . at D PM 14.3 B 14.5 B 15.0 B Ortega High w a y - WE 6 .8 A 8 .4 A 8.5 A AM 45.9 E 4 6.3 E 48.2 E 5 La Novia Ave. at H, E PM 19.7 c 19.8 c 20.4 c Calle Arroyo WE 12.5 B 13.1 B 113.2 B La No v ia Ave. at AM 18.6 B 18.6 B 19.1 B 6 San juan Cr eek -D PM 9.5 A 9 .5 A 9 .7 A Rd. WE 6.6 A 6 .8 A 6.9 A AM 22.4 c 22.5 c 23.2 c 7 La Pata Ave. a t D PM 11.3 B 11.4 B 11.6 B Or tega Highway . WE 5 .3 A 6 .1 A 6.2 A La Pata Ave. at AM 4 .1 A 4.1 A 4.1 A 8 Stallion Ridge / -D PM 3 .3 A 3 .3 A 3 .3 A Vista Montana WE 3.7 A 3 .7 A 3 .7 A Scho ol Ac cess AM 45.2 E 28.2 D 28.9 D 9 Road at Vista -D PM 14.1 B 14.3 B 14.4 8 Montana WE 9 .9 A 11.9 B 12.0 8 NOTES: AM AND PM SHOW PEAK HOURS DURING WEEKDAYS; WE SHOWS PEAK HOURS DURING WEEKEND. 1 "HOT SPOT' CLASSIFICATION WITH MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE LOSE; H 0 =TRAFFIC OPERATIONS; Hs =SCHOOL. 2 HCM DELAY IN SECONDS PER VEH ICLE. SOURCE : KOA CORPORATION, 2017. (4) Significant Impact HCM2 Impact? Change 0.0 No 0.1 No -8 .7 No 0.1 No 0.1 No 1.0 No 0.0 No 0.0 No 0.2 No 0.0 No 0.2 No 1 .6 No 0.4 No 0.1 No 0.6 No 0.0 No 0.0 No 0.2 No 0.1 No 0.1 No 0.8 No 0.0 No 0.0 No 0.0 No -17.0 No 0.2 No 2.0 No As shown in Table 27, all the study intersections are projected to operate at acceptable service levels for the Existing Plus Project condition. This table shows that the project is not expected to result in significant project impacts at any of the study intersections for the Existing Plus Project condition, based on the HCM analysis method. PAGE 112 j CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT INJTJALS'I'UDY Near-Term (2017) Plus Project-Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Analysis As shown in Table 27, all of the study intersections are projected to operate at acceptable service levels for the Near-Term (2017) Plus Project condition. This table shows that the project is not expected to result in significant project impacts at any of the study intersections for the Near-Term (2017) Plus Project condition, based on the HCM analysis method. Existing Plus Project -Roadway Daily Capacity Analysis Table 28 summarizes the analysis results at the key roadway links based on the daily V /C analysis method. The V /C values of Column (1) in Table 28 presents a summary of existing daily V fC traffic conditions. Column (2) lists Existing Plus Project traffic conditions based on current roadway conditions. Column (3) shows the change in V /C values due to the addition of project traffic and indicates whether the proposed project will result in a project impact based on the LOS standards and significant impact criteria defined in this section. As shown in Table 28, all of the roadway links are projected to operate at acceptable service levels for the Existing Plus Project condition. This table shows that the project is not expected to result in significant project impacts for the Existing Plus Project condition, based on the daily V fC method, and no additional peak hour capacity analysis will be needed. Table 28: Roadway Link Daily VJC Analysis and Impact Summary -Existin,q Plus Pro 'ect Condition (1) (2} (3) Existing Plus # Name Link Hot LOS Existing Project Significant Impact Spot1 Std. v;c LOS V/C 1 Orte ga 1-5 SB Ra mps to 1-5 Ho E 0 .626 B 0.627 Highw ay NB Ramps 2 Ortega 1-5 NB Ramps to Ho E 0.805 D 0 .807 Highway Rancho Viejo Rd. 3 Ortega Rancho Vi ejo Rd. to -D 0 .815 D 0 .81 7 Highw ay La Novia Ave. 4 Ortega La Novia Ave. to La D 0.937 E 0.941 Highway PataAve. - 5 La Pata Ave. Ortega Highway to -E 0 .365 A 0 .370 Vista Montana 6 Vista La Pata Ave. to D 0.204 A 0.210 Montana School Access Road - 7 Vista School Access Road D 0 .165 A 0 .165 Montana to west terminus - 8 School La Pata Ave. to Vista D 0.047 A 0.053 Access Road Montana - NOTES: 1 "HoT SPoT' CLASSIFICATION WITH MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE LOSE; Ho =TRAFFIC OPERATIONS; H s =SCHOOl. 2 "HoTSPOT' LOCATION: CoLUMN {2) MINUS CoLUMN {1) IS0.01 OR GREATER; AND LOS {2) IS F. OTHER LOCATION: L ocATION: COLUMN {2) MINUS COLUMN {1) IS 0.01 OR GREATER; AND LOS {2) IS E OR F. LOCAL RESIDENTIAL STREET: COLUMN {2) M INUS COLUMN (1) IS 0 .01 OR GREATER; AND LOS {2) IS D, £,OR F. LOS V/C Change B 0.001 D 0.002 D 0.002 E 0.004 A 0.005 A 0.006 A 0.000 A 0.006 3 "HoT SPoT' LOCATION: CoLUMN {2) MINUS CoLUMN {1} IS 0 .01 OR GREATER; LOS {2} IS A, B, C, D, ORE; AND LOS {3} IS F. OTHER LOCATION: LOCATION: CoLUMN {2) MINUS CoLUMN (1} IS 0.01 OR GREATER; LOS {2} IS A, B, C, OR D; AND LOS {3} IS E OR F. LOCAL RESIDENTIAL STREET: CoLUMN {2) MINUS CoLUMN (1} IS0.01 OR GREATER; LOS {2} IS A, B, OR C; AND LOS {3} IS D, E, OR F. SOURCE: KOA CORPORATION, 2017. Impact? No No No No No No No No )NITJALSTUDY CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT Near-Term (2017) Plus Project-Roadway Daily Capacity Analysis As shown in Table 29, all of the roadway links are projected to operate at acceptable service levels for the Near-Term (2017) Plus Project condition. This table shows that the project is not expected to result in significant project impacts for the Near-Term (2017) Plus Project condition, based on the daily V /C method, and no additional peak hour capacity analysis will be needed. Table 29: Roadway Link Daily VjC Analysis and Impact Summary-Near-Term (2017) Plus Project Condition (1) (2) Near-Term (3) Near-Term # Name Link Hot LOS (2017) (2017)Plus Significant Impact Spot1 Std. Project V/C LOS VjC 1 Ortega 1-5 58 Ramps to 1-5 Ho E 0.632 8 0 .633 Highway N8 Ramps 2 Or tega 1-5 NB Ramps to Ho E 0.814 D 0.815 Highway Rancho Viejo Rd. 3 Ortega Rancho Viejo Rd . to -D 0 .823 D 0 .826 Highway La Novia Ave . 4 Ortega La Novia Ave. to La D 0.946 E 0 .950 Highway Pa taAve. - 5 La PataAve. Ortega Highway to -E 0 .368 A 0 .374 Vista Montana 6 Vista La PataAve. to D 0.206 A 0 .212 Montana School Access Road - 7 Vista School Access Ro a d D 0.167 A 0.167 Montana to westterminus - 8 School La Pata Ave. to Vista D 0.048 A 0 .054 Access Road Montana - N oTES: 1 "HOT SPOT" CLASSIFICATION WITH MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE LOSE; H 0 =TRAFFIC OPERATIONS; H s =SCHOOL. 2 "HoTSPoT' LO CA TI ON: COLUMN (2) M INUS COLUMN (1} IS0.01 OR GREATER; AND LOS (2) IS F. OTHER LOCATION: LOCATION : CoLUMN (2} MINUS COLUMN (1) IS 0.01 OR GREATER; AND LOS (2} IS E OR F. LOCAL RESIDENTIAL STREET: COLUMN (2} MINUS COLUMN (1} IS 0.01 OR GREATER; AND LOS (2) IS 0 , f , OR F. LOS 8 D D E A A A A VjC Change 0.001 0.001 0 .003 0.004 0.006 0.006 0.000 0.006 3 "HOT SPOT' LOCATION: CoLUMN (2} MINUS COLUMN (1} IS 0 .01 OR GREATER; LOS (2) IS A, 8, C, 0, OR E; AND LOS (3) IS F. OTHER LocATION: LOCA TION : CoLUMN (2} M INUS CoLUMN (1} IS 0.01 OR GREA TER; LOS (2) IS A, 8, C, OR 0 ; AND LOS (3) IS fOR F. LOCAL RESIDENTIA L STREET: COLUM N (2) MINUS COLUMN (1} IS 0.01 OR GREATER; LOS (2} IS A, 8 , OR C; AND LOS (3} IS 0 , f, OR F. SOURCE: KOA CORPORATION, 2017. Queuing Analysis Impact? No No No No No No No No As part of the Updated Traffic Impacts Assessment, queuing analysis for all left turn movements at the La Pata Avenue at Stallion Ridge/Vista Montana intersection was conducted for the Existing and Existing Plus Project conditions. Table 30 below summarizes the 95th percentile queuing lengths for each of the left turn movements during the AM and PM peak hours. The eastbound left turn movement of this study intersection has two left turn lanes with the inside lane having a bay length of approximately 175 feet, and the outside lane having a length of approximately 380 feet. The eastbound left turn movement has a 223-foot calculated queue length, based on the analysis, which is shown to exceed the capacity. Although the queue length PAGB114 ~ CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT is calculated at 223 feet, the inside lane is approximately 235 feet in overall length, including the taper length. Therefore, the calculated left turn queue length of 223 feet will not have significant impacts to this intersection. Table 30: 951h Percentile Left Turn Queue Len,qtll Summary La Pata Avenue at NBL SBL EBL WBL Stallion Ridge/Vista Montana Existing AM 1991 33 2211 20 Existing AM Plus Project 1991 33 22 31 20 Existing PM 51 5 72 5 Existing PM Plus Project 51 5 75 5 NOTES: LENGTHS ARE SHOWN IN FEET. QUEUE LENGTH SHOWN IS THE MAXIMUM AFTER TWO CYCLES. NBL =NORTHBOUND LEFT; SBL =SOUTHBOUND LEFT; EBL =EASTBOUND LEFT; WBL =WESTBOUND LEFT. 1 95rH PERCENTILE VOLUME EXCEEDS CAPACITY, QUEUE MA Y BE LONGER (BASED ON 5YNCHRO ANALYSIS). SOURCE: KOA CORPORATION, 2017. Conclusion According to the January 2017 traffic study, all intersections and roadway links would operate at acceptable levels in the Existing Plus Project and Near-Term (2017) Plus Project conditions. Additionally, according to the Updated Traffic Impacts Assessment, the La Pata Avenue at Stallion Ridge/Vista Montana would continue to operate at acceptable levels in the Existing Plus Project and Near-Term (2017) Plus Project conditions. Therefore, impacts would be considered less than significant. Response c): The proposed project does not include airport or airstrip facilities and is not located adjacent to an airport or airstrip. The closest airstrip is the John Wayne Airport approximately 18.5 miles northwest of the project site. According to the Orange County ALUC Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport, the project site is not located within any of the safety zones. The proposed project would not result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks. Implementation of proposed project would have no impact relative to this topic. Responses d-e): No site circulation or access issues have been identified that would cause a traffic safety problem/hazard or any unusual traffic congestion or delay. Access to the project site would be provided by one stop-controlled right-in/right-out only access driveway on Vista Montana and two stop-controlled full access driveways on School Access Road. The proposed access driveway along Vista Montana is proposed to be aligned with Via Granada on the south side and located approximately 425 feet east of La Pata Avenue. Based on the project site plan, this driveway will provide sufficient drive isle clearance between Vista Montana and the parking lot to allow for any potential queuing of vehicles to occur on-site. The two stop- controlled access driveways along School Access Road will provide adequate access to the project site. Based on the site plan, the parking lot layout will provide 25-foot wide two-way drive isles throughout the parking lot for adequate access to parking spaces. Pedestrian access from the L PAGE115 INITIAL STUDY CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LA 'ITER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT parking lot is provided by a pedestrian walkway that leads to the building entrance. Pedestrian sidewalks are also provided surrounding the building and access from Vista Montana. The analysis indicates that all intersections and roadway links would operate at acceptable levels in the Existing Plus Project and Near-Term (2017) Plus Project conditions. Therefore, impacts associated with design features and emergency access would be considered less than significant. Response t): The Circulation Element of the City of San Juan Capistrano General Plan includes the following policies that are relevant to alternative transportation: • Policy 2.1: Encourage the increased use and expansion of public transportation opportunities. • Policy 2.2: Promote new employment-producing development in areas where public transit is convenient and desirable. • Policy 2.3: Encourage the provision of additional regional public transportation services and support facilities, such as park-and-ride lots. • Policy 3.1: Provide and maintain an extensive trails network that supports bicycles, pedestrians, and horses and is coordinated with those networks of adjacent jurisdictions. The proposed project does not conflict with any of the above listed policies from the General Plan Circulation Element. The proposed project would not generate a significant increase in traffic in the area compared to the existing and it would not decrease levels of service to unacceptable levels. In addition, the proposed project would not change the design of any existing pedestrian or bicycle facilities or create any new safety problems in the area. The proposed project will add a small amount of both pedestrians and bicyclists who will utilize both existing and planned facilities connecting the project site with the community at large. The proposed project would not interfere with any existing bus routes and would not remove or relocate any existing bus stops. The proposed project also would not conflict with any transit plans or goals of the City of San Juan Capistrano and, based on the size of the project, it would be expected to generate only limited transit ridership. The project would be expected to provide a minimal amount of additional ridership for the local bus company, the Orange County Transportation Authority. Implementation of the proposed project would have a less than significant impact relative to this topic. l PAGE 116 CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT XVII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant with No Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Impact Incorporation Impact Would the project cause a s ub s tantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural r esource, defined in Public Resourc es Code Section 21074 as e ith er a site, feature, place, cultu r al landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the siz e and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or obj e ct with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and th at is: a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local X register of hi s torical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020 .1(k)? b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and s upported by s ubstantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1? In applying th e criteria set forth in X subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resources to a California Native American trib e. Responses to Checklist Questions Responses a-b): The City has initiated tribal consultation in accordance with Assembly Bill (AB) 52. The City requested a list of tribes that may be interested in the proposed project from the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). On January 11, 2017, the NAHC provided a list of 22 tribes. In letters dated January 11, 2017, City of San Juan Capistrano sent tribal consultation letters to all 22 of the tribes. In the letters, the City provided the tribes with information regarding the proposed project. The City requested that the tribes supply any information they might have concerning prehistoric sites or traditional use areas within the project site. The only tribe that has responded to the tribal consultation letters to date is the }uanefio Band of Mission Indians Acjachemen Nation. In February 2017, the Juanefio Band of Mission Indians Acjachemen Nation responded to the City's consultation letter and requested that a mitigation measure be included in the document in order to ensure that the Juanefio Band of Mission Indians Acjachemen Nation is consulted during construction in the event of a discovery. This measure is included as Mitigation Measure Cul-3 . Based on previous cultural evaluations and consultations, and the mass grading activities that have occurred on the project site, there is a low potential for the discovery of prehistoric, ethnohistoric, or historic archaeological sites that may meet the definition of Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs). Although no TCRs have been documented on the project site, the project is in a region where significant cultural resources have been recorded and there remains a potential that undocumented archaeological resources that may meet the TCR definition could be unearthed or otherwise discovered during ground-disturbing and construction activities. Examples of significant archaeological discoveries that may meet the TCR definition would include villages and cemeteries. Due to the possible presence of undocumented TCRs within the project site, construction-related impacts on tribal cultural resources would be potentially significant. Implementation of the following mitigation measures would require appropriate steps to preserve and/or document any previously undiscovered resources that may be encountered during construction activities, including human remains. Implementation of these measures would reduce any potential impact to a less than significant level. PAGE 117 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LA TIER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT Implement Mitigation Measures Cul-1, -2, -3, and -4. L PAGB1l8 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT INITIAL STUDY XVIII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS PotontJally b_e_ss 'T'hon IJess T11on Significant with N"o Would the project: Significant Mitigation Slgnlflaant Tmpaat lmnaot ln corporaUon Impact a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control X Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of X which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of X existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and X resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the X projects projected demand in addition to the providers existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the projects solid waste X disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and X regulations related to solid waste? Responses to Checklist Questions Responses a), b) and e): The City of San Juan Capistrano Utilities Department currently provides water and wastewater services within the City. The City's Utilities Department operates and maintains a sanitary sewer collection and conveyance system that includes approximately 120 miles of sewers, which range in sizes up to 27 inches in diameter. In addition, the City also operates and maintains two lift stations. Existing sewer facilities in the vicinity of the project site include a sanitary sewer main in Vista Montana and La Pata Avenue. In January 2004, the San Juan Capistrano Public Works Department completed the Sanitary Sewer System Master Plan and Rehabilitation Program Report, which was adopted by the City Council on November 16, 2004. The Master Plan provided a rehabilitation program for the City's sanitary sewer system that dates back to the 1920s. This program was combined with the City's existing rehabilitation program and in conjunction with the City's ongoing sewer cleaning and videotaping, and helps to fulfill State and federal requirement to properly operate and maintain the collection system and ensure that hydraulic capacities are adequate to accommodate sewage generated within the system and to prevent system overflows. The PAGE 119 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT Master Plan also included the projected operational and capital costs associated with the treatment and outfall through the South Orange County Wastewater Authority (SOCWA). San Juan Capistrano is one of the member-agencies that owns capacity in the SOCWA. Wastewater collected in the City's collection system is conveyed to SOCWA's Jay B. Latham Regional Treat ment Plant (JBLRTP) located at 34156 Del Obispo Street in the City of Dana Point. SOCWA serves a 22-square mile area in south Orange County, including the Cities of Aliso Viejo, Laguna Beach, Lake Forest, Laguna Woods, San Juan Capistrano, Laguna Niguel, San Clemente, Santa Margarita, Mission Viejo, Dana Point and Laguna Hills, as well as unincorporated territories within the 22-square mile area. In addition, SOCWA also operates the San Juan Creek Ocean Outfall, which discharges secondary-treated wastewater from the plant into the Pacific Ocean. The City is one of four member agencies that own treatment capacity in the Treatment Plant. The other member agencies are Moulton Niguel Water District (MNWD), Santa Margarita Water District (SMWD), and the South Coast Water District (SCWD). SOCWA also operates the San Juan Creek Ocean Outfall , which discharges treated wastewater into the Pacific Ocean for disposal. The outfall is under the jurisdiction of the San Diego Regional Board. The Jay B. Latham Regional Treatment Plant (JBLRTP) is a conventional activated sludge wastewater treatment with secondary treatment design liquid treatment and solids handling capacities of 13.0 million gallons per day (mgd) and 18.5 mgd, respectively. The City of San Juan Capistrano owns 4.0 mgd of the liquids treatment capacity (30. 77 percent) and 5.55 mgd of th e solids handling capacity (30 percent) of the treatment plant. Sewer mains are located under existing streets within the vicinity of the project site. These sewer mains collect and convey raw sewage generated by the existing single-family residential development and by San Juan Hills High School to the JBLRTP. Sewage flows are conveyed in the City's collection system from this location to facilities in Camino Capistrano and along Trabuco and San Juan Creeks before entering the JBLRTP in Dana Point, where the raw sewage is treated and the effluent discharged from an ocean outfall into the Pacific Ocean. Article 5, Section 9-4.523 of Title 9 (Land Use) of the City's Municipal Code addresses sanitary sewers and includes sewage generation rates for a variety of land uses. Table 4-2 in Section 9-4.523 reflects average daily flow rates for uses other than residential. According to Table 4-2, assembly hall uses generate one gallon per day per seat. The project would include 292 fixed seats and pews. Based on the generation rate of 1 gallons per day per seat, the proposed 292-seat church development would generate an estimated 292 gallons of raw sewage each day. The raw sewage generated by the proposed project would be conveyed from the site via a series of four-to eight-inch sewer pipes, ultimately connecting to an existing city sewer main in Vista Montana. Private sewer clean outs would also be constructed, pursuant to City standards. The project applicant will be required to prepare and submit a sewer study that reflects the design standards prescribed by the City for both laterals and main line sewers, if determined necessary as a result of the sewer study. In addition, all laterals extended to the existing sewer main from the project site would be designed in accordance with the Uniform Plumbing Code. As a result, project implementation will not result in significant impacts; no mitigation measures are required. The City has established that there is adequate capacity at the WWTRF to serve build-out of anticipated residential land in the city, and the distribution system operates at acceptable levels [ PAGE 120 CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LA TIER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROjECT JNJTIALSrtJDY and has been designed to accommodate expansions and service extensions. The proposed project would place a church facility on a site that was originally planned for residential development. The wastewater generated would be less then what would be generated if the project were developed under residential uses. There is capacity at the WWTRF to serve the proposed project. The project applicant would be required to pay applicable connection fees to offset any financial impacts. There would not be a need to expand or build a new treatment facility. Implementation of the proposed project would have a less than significant impact. Response c): Development of the project site would place impervious surfaces on the approximately 4.54-acre project site. Development of the project site would potentially increase local runoff, and would introduce constituents into storm water that are typically associated with urban runoff. These constituents include heavy metals (such as lead, zinc, and copper) and petroleum hydrocarbons. BMPs will be applied to the proposed site development to limit the concentrations of these constituents in any site runoff that is discharged into downstream facilities to acceptable levels. The project would be designed and constructed with an on-site storm drainage bio-retention basin. The bio-retention basin would be located in the northern portion of the project site. The basin is designed to be five feet deep with two feet of sand, three inches of coarse sand, two feet of gravel, and one foot of free board. The basin area would account for a total surface area of 3,603 square feet. The basin is engineered to account for on-site storm drainage flows. The construction of the stormwater conveyance and detention system would ensure that the project is consistent with all applicable plans and regulations related to stormwater conveyance and detention as required by the city, and would ensure that offsite, or onsite flooding does not occur during storm events. All of the storm drainage facilities required for the proposed project would be located on the project site. As such, there is no potential for the project to result in environmental impacts associated with the construction of off-site drainage facilities. The environmental impacts associated with the construction of onsite drainage facilities fall within the project "footprint" and have been addressed throughout this environmental document. Implementation of the proposed project would have a less than significant impact. Response d): The City of San Juan Capistrano Utilities Department provides water services to the project site. The Utilities Department derives its domestic water from three sources: (1) 45 percent is purchased from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) and consists of water from the Colorado River via the Colorado River Aqueduct and Northern California water via the State Water Project; (2) approximately 44 percent of the City's water supply is produced by its Groundwater Recover Plant; and (3) the remaining 11 percent is obtained from local groundwater wells located within the City. Domestic water is provided within the City's system within six distinct zones defined by reservoirs, and 27 sub-zones served through pressure regulating stations and hydropneumatic systems. San Juan Capistrano itself does not have any surface water supplies. Indirectly the City gets surface water from the imported water system. All of the City's locally produced domestic water supply is from groundwater and, when needed, imported water from the State Water Project system (surface) and/or Colorado River (surface). Imported water is supplied to the City through connections from the Joint Regional Water Supply System's (formerly the Tri-Cities Municipal Water District) Eastern Transmission Main, and the South County Pipeline. The [ PAGR121 CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT remainder is from local groundwater. Supply through the Eastern Transmission Main is conveyed to the City at the Master Meter (CM-10), which provides the majority of the imported water supply to the City at a hydraulic grade elevation (HGE) varying from 450 to 475 feet above mean sea level (amsl). The City is allowed to take up to 15 cubic feet per second (cfs) at the Master Meter connection. Imported water from the South County Pipeline is conveyed through the SC-04 Turnout connection. The City's current capacity through the SC-04 connection is 4.9 cfs at the HGE of 800 feet amsl. The City has an option to obtain additional capacity, up to a total of 10.0 cfs in the future. The City of San Juan Capistrano adopted a Domestic Water Master Plan (DWMP) and Non-Domestic/Recycled Water Master Plan Updated to address water resources in the City. The Groundwater Recovery Plant (GWRP) extracts water that is high in minerals (e.g., iron, manganese, and total dissolved solids) and treats the water to make it suitable for potable water uses. The GWRP facilities consist of six wells located along the San Juan Creek as well as a treatment facility located in the City's municipal complex. The reverse osmosis treatment facility sequesters and removes the iron and manganese in addition to high concentrations of total dissol ved solids; chlorine and ammonia are added to the finished water, which supplements the potable water supply. This facility has an existing treatment capacity of 5.14 million gallons per day (mgd). The City provides domestic water service within a n area that encompasses approximately 14.4 square miles (i.e., 9,2 00 acres), mostly within its corporate boundaries. The existing population in the City's water service area is about 36,000. The current water use average day domestic water demand for the City of San Juan Capistrano service area is approximately 8.4 mgd, with a maximum day domestic demand of approximately 16.0 mgd. Ultimate domestic water demand for the City's service area at buildout (i.e., 2020) is estimated to be about 9.14 mgd for an average day and 17.3 6 mgd for the maximum day demand. The proposed project includes development of a 16,558-square-foot Meetinghouse/Cultural Hall building and chapel with 292 fixed seats and pews on the 4.54-acre site. The "Average Day Demands" established by the City of San Juan Capistrano's Standard Specifications for the Construction of Domestic Water and Recycled Water Facilities (2006) were used to calculate estimated water demand for the proposed project. A demand factor of 935 gallons per day (gpd) for Public/Institutional was used. Total daily demand is estimated to be 4,244.9 gpd. The additional water demand (4,244.9 gpd) would not exceed the City's available water supply. The City's water treatment and conveyance infrastructure is adequate to serve existing demand, in addition to the demand created by the proposed project. Implementation of the proposed project would have a less than significant impact. Responses f), g): The City of San Juan Capistrano contracts with CR&R, a private solid waste hauler, to collect and dispose of the solid waste/refuse generated in the City. Solid waste/refuse collected in the City by CR&R is transported to one of the Class III (i.e., acceptance of municipal solid waste) operated and maintained by the County of Orange OC Waste & Recycling (OCW &R), formerly called Integrated Waste Management Department (IWMD). The OCW&R is responsible for providing sanitary landfill capacity to the City of San Juan Capistrano and within the County of Orange. At the present time, the OCW&R maintains and operates three Class III sanitary landfills: Frank R. Bowerman Landfill, Olinda Alpha Landfill, and Prima Deshecha Landfill. Of the three landfills currently operated by the IWMD, the closest landfill to the site, and the one that would accept refuse generated at the site, is the Prima Deshecha Landfill, located at 32250 La Pata Avenue in the City of San Juan Capistrano. The landfill property encompasses 1,530 PAGE12-2 ] CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT acres, of which 699 acres are permitted for refuse disposal activities. The landfill was opened in 1976 and is scheduled to close in approximately 2067. The Prima Deshecha Landfill, which is permitted to accept up to 4,000 tons of municipal solid waste per day, currently receives an average of approximately 1,500 to 2,000 tons per day (i.e., 37.5 to 50 percent of its daily permitted capacity). The landfill has an estimated remaining disposal capacity of 135.09 million cubic yards. Project construction activities would generate solid waste, including excess construction materials and material removed during site clearing. However, the site is vacant, and construction would not require demolition of existing structures or removal of large quantities of waste. It is anticipated that compliance with the construction waste requirements in CALGreen would be sufficient to minimize solid waste generation. Additionally, as required by City Code Section 4.11.3-2, reuse, recycling and/or diversion of SO percent or more of the construction debris will reduce the amount of construction waste materials deposited in one of the County's sanitary landfills. As a result, construction impacts associated with the proposed project would be less than significant. During operation of the project, the church facility would produce solid waste that would be collected and transferred to the landfill system. Based on a waste generation rate of 0.007 pounds per square foot per day2 and the proposed 16,558-square-foot church, the project is expected to produce approximately 115.9 pounds per day (21.2 tons of solid waste annually). The landfill system has sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs in compliance with all applicable laws based on the calculated waste generation rate. Implementation of the proposed project would have a less than significant impact relative to this topic. 2 Ca!Recycle. Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates. 2017. Available at: <https:f fwww2.calrecycle.ca.gov /WasteCharacterization/General/Rates >. CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LA TIER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT XV/X MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant with No Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Impact lncor:ooratlon Impact a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal X community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable X when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on X human beings, either directly or indirectly? Responses to Checklist Questions Response a): This Initial Study includes an analysis of the project impacts associated with aesthetics, agricultural and forest resources, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, mineral resources, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, transportation and traffic, and utilities and service systems. The analysis covers a broad spectrum of topics relative to the potential for the proposed project to have environmental impacts. This includes the potential for the proposed project to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. It was found that the proposed project would have either no impact, a less than significant impact, or a less than significant impact with the implementation of mitigation measures. For the reasons presented throughout this Initial Study, the proposed project would not substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. With the implementation of mitigation measures presented in this Initial Study, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact relative to this topic. Response b): This Initial Study includes an analysis of the project impacts associated with aesthetics, agricultural and forest resources, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, mineral resources, noise, population and housing, public L!AGB124 ] CHURCH OF jESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT INITIAL STuDY services, recreation, transportation/traffic, and utilities and service systems. The analysis covers a broad spectrum of topics relative to the potential for the proposed project to have environmental impacts. It was found that the proposed project would have either no impact, a less than significant impact, or a less than significant impact with the implementation of mitigation measures. These mitigation measures would also function to reduce the project's contribution to cumulative impacts. The project would increase the population and use of public services and systems; however, it was found that there is adequate capacity to accommodate the project. There are no significant cumulative or cumulatively considerable effects that are identified associated with the proposed project after the implementation of all mitigation measures presented in this Initial Study. With the implementation of all mitigation measures presented in this Initial Study, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact relative to this topic. Response c): The construction phase could affect surrounding neighbors through increased air emissions, noise, and traffic; however, the construction effects are temporary and are not substantial. The operational phase could also affect surrounding neighbors through increased air emissions, noise, and traffic; however, mitigation measures have been incorporated into the proposed project that would reduce the impacts to a Jess than significant level. The proposed project would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings. Implementation of the proposed project would have a less than significant impact relative to this topic. [ PAGR12S JNITW,.SWDY CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT REFERENCES Army Corps of Engineers. 1987. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. Barbour and Major 1988. Terrestrial Vegetation of California. C Donald Ahrens. 2006. Meteorology Today: An Introduction to Weather, Climate, & the Environment. City of San Juan Capistrano. City of San Juan Capistrano Municipal Code. Current through Ordinance 1044 and theApril2017 code supplement. City of San Juan Capistrano. Draft Environmental Impact Report SCH No. 2012071092 -Rancho San Juan Apartments. April 2013. CALEEMOD. v2016.3.1. California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). Accessed August 2017. Available: http:/ jwww.caleemod.com/ California Air Pollution Control Officers Association. Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures. August 2010. California Air Resources Board. Risk Reduction Plan to Reduce Particulate Matter Emissions from Diesel-Fueled Engines and Vehicles. October 2000. Available: <https:/ jwww.arb.ca.gov f diesel/ documentsjrrpFinal.pdf>. California Air Resources Board. 2016. ARB Databases: Aerometric Data Analysis and Management System (ADAM). Available: <http:/ jwww.arb.ca.gov jhtmljdatabases.htm>. California Department of Conservation. 2016. California Important Farmland Finder. Available: <http: j jmaps.conservation.ca.gov /ciff f ciff.html>. California Department of Conservation. California Land Conservation Act 2014 Status Report, The Williamson Act. March 2015. California Energy Commission. 2005. Global Climate Change: In Support of the 2005 Integrated Energy Policy Report. (CEC-600-2005-007.) Available: <http:/ jwww.energy.ca.gov /2005publications/CEC-100-2005-007 /CEC-100-2005-00 7- CMF.PDF>. California Energy Commission. 2006. Inventory of California Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks 1990 to 2004. (CEC-600-2006-013-SF.) Available: <http:/ jwww.energy.ca.gov /2006publications/CEC-600-2006-0 13 /CEC-600-2006-013- SF.PDF>. California Herps. A Guide to Amphibians and Reptiles of California. Available at: <http:/ jwww.californiaherps.comj>. Commercial Development Resources. Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) - Project Name: LDS Church, Tract No. 16634, CUP 14-018, CA14-006, Ac 14-022, APN: 664- 251-21. Portions of 664-251-20 and 664-251-28, Vista Montana, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675. Revised May 8, 2017. L PAGB126 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT INITIALS'ITUDY Giroux & Associates. Noise Impact Analysis, San Juan Capistrano LDS Church, City of San Juan Capistrano, California. August 23, 2017. Hetherington Engineering, Inc. Third-Party Geotechnical Review (Third Review), LDS Church, Vista Montana, San Juan Capistrano, California AC14-033. July 11, 2017. Hickman, James C. 1993. Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2007. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, Summary for Policy Makers. Available: <http:/ /fire.pppl.gov /ipcc_summary_020207.pdf >. John R. Byerly, Inc. Response to Third Party Geotechnical Review -LDS San Juan Capistrano, Vista Montana, San Juan Capistrano, California, LDS Property no. 591-7308. May 8, 2016. KOA Corporation. Focused Traffic Impact Analysis for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Project in the City of San Juan Capistrano. June 24, 2016. KOA Corporation. Technical Memorandum -Subject: Updated Traffic Impacts Assessment for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints in the City of San Juan Capistrano. April 13, 2017. Leighton and Associates, Inc. As-Graded Report of Mass Grading, Southeast Lots 1-140 and Perimeter Slope Areas, Tract 16634, Whispering Hills Development, San Juan Capistrano, Orange County, California (Project No. 971155-008). April 5, 2007. Leighton and Associates, Inc. Proposed Expansion of Development Area, Proposed Multi-Family Housing Development, Whispering Hills, San Juan Capistrano, California (Project No. 971155-008). April 5, 2007. Leighton and Associates, Inc. Response to LDC's February 16, 2007 Third Party Geotechnical Review of Reports on 40-Scale Grading Plan Review, and on Expansion of Development Area to Include Multifamily Site, Whispering Hills, San Juan Capistrano (Project No. 971155-008). April 24, 2007. Sawyer, John and Todd Keeler-Wolf. 1995. A Manual of California Vegetation. Skinner, Mark W. and Bruce M. Pavlik, Eds. 2001. California Native Plant Society's Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California. South Coast Air Quality Management District. SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds. Revised March 2015. United States Census Bureau. 2015. Quickfacts-San Juan Capistrano city, California. Available: <https:/ /www.census.gov fquickfactsftable/PST045216/0668028>. PAGI1127 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE PROJECT This page left intentionally blank. PAGE 128 De Novo Planning Group ----------------------------------------·· •• A Land U se Planning, De si g n, and En v ir o nmen t a l Firm Responses to Comments and Errata for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Meetinghouse Project Introduction and List of Commenters The Initial Study J Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Meetinghouse Project was available for the statutory 30-day public review from September 1, 2017 to October 2, 2017. No new significant environmental impacts or issues, beyond those already covered in the IS/MND for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Meetinghouse Project, were raised during the comment period. The following table lists the comments on the IS/MND that were submitted to the City of San Juan Capistrano during the 30-day public review period for the IS/MND. The assigned comment letter, letter date, letter author, and affiliation, if presented in the comment letter or if representing a public agency, are also listed. Letters received are coded with letters (A, B, etc.). LIST OF COMMENTERS ON IS/MND RESPONSE INDIVIDUAL OR SIGNATORY AFFILIATION DATE LETTER A Richard Vuong Orange County Public Works 9-18-2017 B Dan Phu Orange County Transportation Authority 9-27-2017 Errata This document also includes minor edits to the IS/MND. These modifications resulted from a comment received during the public review period for the IS/MND, as well as City staff initiated edits to clarify language. These changes are provided in revision marks with und e rline for new text and strike o1:1t for deletes tex-t. Responses to Comment Letters Written comments on the IS/MND are reproduced on the following pages, along with responses to those comments. To assist in referencing comments and responses, the following coding system is used: • Those comments received are represented by a lettered response. • Each letter is lettered (i.e., Letter A) and each comment within each letter is numbered (i.e., comment A-1, comment A-2). DE NOVO PLANNING GROUP 1020 SUNCAST LANE, SUITE 106, ELDORADO HILLS, CA 95762 (916) 949-3231 Subject: Responses to Comments and Errata for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Meetinghouse Project MND Date: October 6, 2017 Public Works lnleflrlty, Accountability, Service, Trust Shane L Silsby, Director September 18, 2017 David Contreras, Senior Planner Development Services Department, City of San Juan Capistrano 32400 Paseo Adelanto San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 NCL-2017-054 Subject: Notice of Intent to Adopt a MND for the LDS Meetinghouse Project Dear Mr. Contreras: The County of Orange has reviewed the Notice of Intent to Adopt a MND for the LDS Meetinghouse Project and has no comments at this time. We would like to be advised of A-1 any further developments on the project. Please continue to keep us on the distribution list for future notifications related to the project. (}) ~~ ... ~m;,. OC Public Works Service Area/OC Development Services 300 North Flower Street Santa Ana, California 92702-4048 Richard.Vuong@ocpw.ocgov.com 300 N. Flower Street, Santa Ana, CA 92703 P .0. Box 4048, Santa Ana , CA 92702-4048 www.ocpubllcwori<s.com 714.667 ,8800 I lnfo@OCPW.oogov com 2 Subject: Responses to Comments and Errata for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Meetinghouse Project MND Date: October 6, 2017 Response to Letter A: Orange County Public Works Response A-1: This comment is noted. This comment notes that Orange County Public Works has no comments at this time. The commenter will be advised of any further developments for the proposed project. No further response is necessary. 3 Subj e ct: Responses to Comments a nd Errata for the Church of j e sus Christ of Latter Day Saint s Meetinghouse Project MND Da t e : Oc t ob e r 6, 2017 m OCTA A~~ILIATED AGENCIES Orangs County TrBnsil OJslricl Local Transporlalion Authority Service Authority for Freeway Emetr~encies Consolidilled Transporation sorncoAgoncy Conguslion ManagomRnl Agency Sorvice Autlwn·ly for AbandonBd Vshicles September 27, 2017 Mr. David Contreras Senior Planner, Development Services City of San Juan Capistrano 32400 Pas~o Adelanto San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Subject: Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Meetinghouse Project Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study Dear Mr. Mendoza · Thank you for providing the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) with the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study for the Church of Jesus B-1 Christ of Latter Day Saints Meetinghouse Project (Project). The following comments are provided for your consideration: • On Page 108, Section XVI ('Transportation and Traffic'), Subsection Transit Service': o Please revise text to reflect t the Orange County Line and the Inland Empire-Orange County Line are both serviced by Metrolink, while the Amtrak Pacific Surfliner is serviced by Amtrak. OCT A does not operate rail services. o Please correct the local route number to Route 91. OCTA also operates intracounty express Route 212 and Route 216, both of which terminate at the Junipero Serra Park and Ride in San Juan Capistrano. Throughout the development of this project, we encourage communication with OCTA on any matters discussed herein. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me at (714) 560-5907 or at dphu@octa.net. Since rely, , I ·' Dan Phu Manager, Environmental Programs Orang9 County Transportation Authority 550 South Main StreB II P.O. Box 14t84 I Orange I California 92863-1584 I ( 714) 560-0CTA (6282) B-2 B-3 4 Subject: Responses to Comments and Errata for the Church of jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Meetinghouse Project MND Date: October 6, 2017 Response to Letter B: Orange County Transportation Authority Response B-1: Response B-2: Response B-3: This comment is noted. This comment serves as an introduction to the letter and does not warrant a response. No further response is necessary. This comment is noted . Revisions to the Initial Study are identified below with revision marks (u n d erline for new text, stFil~e ol:lt for deleted text). None of the revisions identify new significant environmental impacts, nor do any of the revisions result in substantive changes to the Initial Study. The new information to the Initial Study is intended to merely correct and clarify the information . Page 108 of the IS/MND notes that Orange County Transportation Authority Local Route 99 provides local bus service generally following I-5 within the City. While this alone is correct, additional routes provide service in the project area. According to the comment, Routes 212 and 216 also operate within the City. Additionally, according to the comment, the service providers for the various transit service lines are incorrect. Page 108 of the IS/MND has been revised as follows: Transit service in San juan Capistrano consists of the "Orange County Line", the "Inland Empire-Orange County Line", and the "Amtrak Pacific Surfliner" ~ Hetr olinlt Roates, w hic h The O ra n ~e Coun ty Li n e an d t he In lan d Em pire-P ra n ce Co u gty Li ne are operated by Metro linls Orange Goanty Trans portation l.~:~ilierit)'. Th e Amtra k Pacific Su r flin er js o p erated by Amtrak. All three of these Metrelialt -Rroutes arrive and depart from the San juan Capistrano Station, located at 26701 Verdugo Street in downtown San juan Capistrano. Additionally, Orange County Transportation Authority Local Route 919 provides local bus service generally following I-5 within the City. Fu r t h er. Oramile Cou nty Tra ns po rtation Au thority o perates in traco un t;y express Ro utes 212 an d 2 16. bot h o f w h ich t erm inate at t he Ju n i pero Serra Park a nd Rid e jn Sa n Ju a n Cap istra no . Although these transit a nd b us routes serve the downtown area and other regions, the routes do not currently extend to the eastern portion of the City, in which the project site is located. This comment is noted. This comment serves as a conclusion to the letter and does not warrant a response. No further response is necessary. 5 Subject: Responses to Comments and Errata for the Church of jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Meetinghouse Project MND Date: October 6, 2017 This page left intentionally blank 6 EXHIBIT 8 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM This document is the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Meetinghouse Project (project). This MMRP has been prepared pursuant to Section 21081.6 of the California Public Resources Code, which requires public agencies to "adopt a reporting and monitoring program for the changes made to the project or conditions of project approval, adopted in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment." A MMRP is required for the proposed project because the Initial Study j Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) has identified significant adverse impacts, and measures have been identified to mitigate those impacts. The numbering of the individual mitigation measures follows the numbering sequence as found in the IS/MND. MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM The MMRP, as outlined in the following table, describes mitigation timing, monitoring responsibilities, and compliance verification responsibility for all mitigation measures identified in the IS/MND. The City of San Juan Capistrano will be the primary agency responsible for monitoring the mitigation measures. The MMRP is presented in tabular form on the following pages. The components of the MMRP are described briefly below: • Mitigation Measures: The mitigation measures are taken from the IS/MND in the same order that they appear in that document. • Mitigation Timing: Identifies at which stage of the project mitigation must be completed. • Monitoring Responsibility: Identifies the agency that is responsible for mitigation monitoring. • Compliance Verification: This is a space that is available for the monitor to date and initial when the monitoring or mitigation implementation took place. MMRP-Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Meetinghouse Project 1 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM TABLE l: MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING TIMING VERIFICATION RESPONSIBILITY (DATE/INITIALS) BIOLOGICAL REsouRcEs Mitigation Measure Bio·l: Prior to any permit issuance for grubbing, gradiny, tree City of San Juan Prior to any permit trimminyjremova/ or prior to engaginy in such activities that would occur between the breediny Capistrano issuance for season for native birds (February 15 throuyh july 31}, the project applicant shalf retain the Development grubbing, grading, services of a qualified ornitholoyist to conduct an ornitholoyica/ survey of the construction zone. Services tree The City will require the developer to submit a copy of the executed contract for such services Department trimming/removal or prior to the issuance of any yradiny permits. The arnithofoyica/ survey shalf occur not more than prior to engaging in seven days prior to the initiation of those gradinyjconstruction activities. If the ornitholoyist such activities that detects any occupied nests of native birds within the construction zone or in close proximity to, would occur between they shalf be mapped on construction plans and the project applicant will fence off the area(s) the breeding season supportiny bird nests with temporary construction fencing, providing a minimum buffer of 200 for native birds feet between the nest and limits of construction. (This buffer zone shalf be at feast 500 feet for (February 15 raptors until the youny have jledyed, are no fonyer being fed by the parents, have left the nest, through July 31) and will no longer be impacted by the project) The construction crew will be instructed to avoid any activities in the zone until the bird nest(s) isjare no fonyer occupied, per a subsequent survey by the qualified ornithologist Alternatively, the project applicant will consult as appropriate with the USFWS to discuss the potential foss of nests of native birds covered by the MBTA to obtain the appropriate permit from the USFWS. CULTURAL REsOURCES Mitigation Measure Cu/-1: A qualified archaeoloyist (defined as an archaeoloyist on the List of City of San Juan During the pre· Certified Archaeo/oyists for Oranye County) shall be retained by the project applicant and shall be Capistrano construction present at pre-construction meetings to advise construction contractors about the sensitive Development meetings and during nature of cultural resources located on and/or in the vicinity of the project site, as well as Services construction / monitoring requirements. A qualified monitor (defined as an individual with a bachelors degree Department grading activities in anthropology with archaeo/oyical monitoring experience), supervised by the qualified archaeo/oyist, shalf observe on· and off-site construction activities that result in gradiny, and/or excavatiny on or below the oriyinal yround surface (including during project-related off-site utility [natural gas, electricity, sewer, water, drainage, communications, etc.] and roadway improvements). Should nonhuman cultural resources be discovered, the monitor shall have the power to temporarily haft or divert construction activities until the qualified archaeologist can determine if the resources are siynificant and, ifsiynificant, until recovered by the archaeo/oyist In the event that human remains are discovered, construction activities shall be halted or diverted until the provisions of§7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code and §5097.98 of the Public Resources Code have been implemented. 2 MMRP · Church of jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Meetinghouse Project MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTIN G PRO GRAM MITIGATION MEASURE Mitigation Measure Cu/·2: During construction/grading activities, a Native American monitor shall observe construction/grading activities that result in grading, excavating, and/or trenching on or below the original ground surface (including during project-related offsite utility (e.g., natural gas, electricity, sewer, water, drainage, communications, etc.] and roadway improvements). The Native American monitor shall consult with the archaeological monitor regarding objects and remains encountered during grading that may be considered sacred or important In the event that evidence of human remains is discovered, the Native American monitor shall verify that the archaeologist has notified the Coroner. Mitigation Measure Cu/·3: If a significant Tribal Cultural Resource and/or unique archaeological resource is inadvertently discovered during ground disturbing activities for this the project, the juaneiio Band of Mis sion Indians Acjachemen Nation (JBMIAN} re spectfully request avoidance as the preferred method of preservation for archaeological, historical, paleontological and Tribal Cultural Resources pursuant to California Public Reso urces Code Section 21083.2 (b). If however, itis demonstrated that avoidance of a significant and/or unique cultural resource is infeasible, a data recovery plan shall be prepared and submitted to the City of San juan Capistrano and the ]BMIAN. Mitigation Measure Cu/-4: If any prehistoric or historic artifacts, human remains or other indications of archaeological or paleontological resources are found during grading and construction activities, an archaeologist meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards in prehistoric or historical archaeology, as appropriate, shall be consulted to evaluate the finds and recommend appropriate mitigation measures. If cultural resources are identified, every effort shall be made to avoid the resources, with preservation an important goal. If significant sites cannot feasibly be avoided, appropriate measures, such as data recovery excavations or photographic documentation of buildings, shall be undertaken consistent with applicable state and federal regulations. If the find is determined to be be a tribal cultural resource and the discovered archaeological resource cannot be avoided, then applicable mitigation measures for the resource shall be discussed with the geographically affiliated tribe. Applicable mitigation mea sures that also take into account the cultural values and meaning of the discovered tribal cultural resource, including confidentiality if requested by the tribe, shall be completed (e.g., preservation in place, data recovery program pursuant to PRC §21083.2[i]). During evaluation or mitigative treatment, ground disturbance and construction work could continue on other parts of the project site. If human remains are discovered, all work shall be halted immediately within 50 meters MONITORING RESPONSIBILITY Native American monitor City of San juan Capistrano Development Services Department juaneiio Band of Mission Indians Acjachemen Nation City of San Juan Capistrano Development Services Department Qualified archaeologist Native American Heritage Commission City of San juan Capistrano Development Services TIMIN G During construction I grading activities If a significant Tribal Cultural Resource and/or unique archaeological resource is inadvertently discovered during ground disturbing activities for this project If any prehistoric or historic artifacts, human remains or other indications of archaeological or paleontological resources are found during grading and conslTuction activities MMRP-Church ofJesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Meetinghouse Project VERIFICATION (DATE/INITIAL S) 3 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM MI TIGATION MEASURE MONITORING TIM ING VERIFICATION RESPONSIBILITY (DATE/INITIALS) (165 feet) of the discovery, the County Coroner must be notified, according to Section Department 5097.98 of the State Public Resources Code and Section 7050.5 of California's Health and Safety Code. If the remains are determined to be Native American, the coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission, and the procedures outlined in CEQA Section 15064.5( d J and (e J shall be followed. . If any fossils are encountered, there shall be no further disturbance of the area surrounding this find until the materials have been evaluated by a qualified pa/eontalagis~ and appropriate treatment measures have been identified. GEOLOGY AND SOILS Mitigation Measure Geo-1: Prior to earthmoving activities for the project, a certified City of San juan Prior to earthmoving geotechnical engineer, or equivalent, shall be retained to perform a final geotechnical evaluation Capistrano activities for the of the soils at a design-level as required by the requirements of the California Building Code Title Development project 24, Part 2, Chapter 18, Section 1803.1.1.2 related to expansive soils and other soil conditions. The Services evaluation shall be prepared in accordance with the standards and requirements outlined in Department California Building Code, Title 24, Part 2, Chapter 16, Chapter 17, and Chapter 18, which addresses structural design, tests and inspections, and soils and foundation standards. The final Certified geotechnical evaluation shall include design recommendations to ensure that soil conditions do geotechnical not pose a threat to the health and safety of people or structures, including threats from engineer landslides, unstable sails, expansive sails, or post·canstructian settlement The grading and improvement plans shall be designed in accordance with the recommendations provided in the final geotechnical evaluation. Mitigation Measure Geo-2: The project applicant shall submit a Notice of Intent (NO/) and City of San juan Prior to earthmoving Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to the RWQCB in accordance with the NPDES Capistrano activities General Construction Permit requirements. The SWPPP shall be designed to control pollutant Development discharges utilizing Best Management Practices (BMPs) and technology to reduce erosion and Services sediments. BMPs may consist of a wide variety of measures taken to reduce pollutants in Department stormwater runoff from the project site. Measures shall include temporary erosion control measures (such as silt fences, staked straw bales/wattles, silt/sediment basins and traps, check Regional Water dams, geofabric, sandbag dikes, and temporary revegetation or other ground cover] that will be Quality Control employed to control erosion from disturbed areas. Final selection of BMPs will be subject to Board approval by the City of San juan Capistrano and the RWQCB. The SWPPP will be kept on site during construction activity and will be made available upon request to representatives of the RWQCB and City. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY 4 MMRP-Church of jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Meetinghouse Project MITIGATI ON MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM MITICA 'riON M f.'ltSURii MONI'/'QRING TIM IN(; VER/f1CA7'/0N RHSPoNS/01/JTY (DATE/INITIAl.~) Mitigation Mcnsur" llydro-1: The st onn dmlnnge plan shall be designed and engineered to City or San Juan eiLWre that post·pro)Kt runoff Is equal to or less than pre-project runoff. The applicant shall Capistrano Engineer provide the City Engineer \vith aU sromnvoll!r runoff calculations \vlth the Improvement plan subnlittal MMRP-Church of)csus Christ ofLiltter Day Satnts Meetinghouse Project 5 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM This page left intentionally blank. MMRP-Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Meetinghouse Project 6